I want to point out that most people that can afford to get this for the "courtside" thing could probably just afford to sit courtside at a real game.😂
Most consumers do not want to walk around for hours every day with a brick strapped to their face, their is really no getting around that, so the price the $$ is not even the biggest problem.
@@raytherrien2851Went to the Apple Store and asked about the laptops they had, they said “we don’t sell laptops, we sell MacBooks” that was like 10 years ago and it still confuses me to this day
The problem is that I can bring my smartphone everywhere I go and do virtually anything with the tens of million of Apps available. But Vision Pro applications are very limited and the user experience on many Apps would definitely poorer than using your smartphone. I think Vison Pro may have a future, but such future could be another 10 years away until the headset can be reduced to the size of a pair of glasses where carrying it and wearing it will not be a burden.
$3500 is a LOT of money for a LOT of people, considering the rapidly rising costs of living, and in other countries it's going to be selling for more, expect in Canada a price near $5000. Yeah, right...
I actually bought the xreal air 2 pro glasses, and been using it for a couple of days, ill tell you right now, its not perfect, but playing games and watching movies on them is just surreal, 120 inch micro oled display (1080p unfortunately)inside a 75 gram sun glasses is amazing, and wearing them doesn't make you look like you are from space. and sure they are expensive as well at $450 but its nothing compared to the price of the vision pro. also there is xreal beam which is an external device that can do spatial computing to make it so that the screen stays in place and increase the size of it to 300 inch. I have not tried it yet, so i can't tell if its any good. still for my use case it feels like a better deal than the vision pro.
@@CrustyHead2465 It's a vr headset... damn cool one, don't get me wrong, but at $3500 the only thing they are introducing is a new patent portfolio. The average consumer isn't the target audience, but without the average consumer on board, they are going to be hard pressed to find developers willing to sink time and money into developing anything but standard desktop apps for it... in which case.. they are basically an Oculus, with a 1000% markup
the practical applications of it are essentially a less productive computer that you wear over your eyes for 8 hours to do your work, that you drag an external battery around with. @@CrustyHead2465
These jokers act like $3500 is a hindrance to purchasing this item. Early adopters are exactly the consumer base that will pay that price. Blah blah blah.
This is a joke of a video. Needlessly inflammatory and hyperbolic. Many people make more than enough money to justify this purchase as a fun toy - myself included. This product is packed with innovation. The fact is that if it were $1k you wouldn't be talking all of this shit. You're just doing what is popular, easy, and gets clicks. GREAT JOB GUYS!
the vision pro needs a big new application that we cant yet do with the Quest 3, but so far there isn't. with quest 3 we already have AR, 3D movies/shows, games, productivity apps and more, for 1/5 of the price, the only thing vision pro have rn is disney+ and face time...? it really doesnt make any sense to buy this RIGHT NOW, but maybe in the future there will be some apps that can only run in this, but i really think this will flop and only the next interation of this will be actually cool
Its not for gaming as everyone keeps screaming about. If it was Apple would need to make massive investments in securing first-party exclusives for it , because developers aren't going to want to develop exclusively for such a small market share.
Exactly. Watching reviewers drool because they can pinch and drag things around in their room is cringe worthy. Quest has been doing that for years now.
@@BiggNewtI don’t think it’s the existence of the features, but how refined those features are that makes reviewers drool. On paper, the Apple Vision Pro doesn’t do anything new but it combines a lot of niche things into an almost “super vr headset” that has a lot of capability.
I just watched a breakdown of the actual cost of the device, and believe it or not, the device is unpriced. The hate on this is outrageous. He says, "It doesn't even last more than two hours" Yeah, neither does the Quest 3. The Quest pro and Vive are also heavier. It's just a bunch of opinion and conjecture. People will bash, and people will overhype this. Time is the only thing that will tell us how this plays out.
Lmaooo you just compared 600usd devices to a 3500usd device you'd think that the vision pro would make battery improvements with that price tag, instead it's another glorified metal paper weight with a designer logo (Apple)
@@CyanLucifer The comparison is quite good because the power draw of the Vision Pro as a 3500 device is much higher. It is running two chips and dual 4k screens.
Agreed that the hate isn't useful, but there's no point in acting like anyone should get it either. It's a beta product for a test audience, not at all meant for general consumers yet.
if you have $3500 for a headset, you have an extra hundred for a battery bank to put in your pocket instead of wearing the extra weight on your face. @@CyanLucifer
I bought it and I’m not really a content creator, I do have 159k on IG but that’s for like jackass stunts type stuff so I won’t post about it on there. But I do plan on making a video for my channel with 30 subs mainly because that’s a channel I just post on for fun and don’t take it serious. But I bought one because I always wanted a really good AR device. I thought Microsoft holo lens was cool until I started to think more and more about how everything you see is see through. I personally like AR way more than VR because I’m not impressed with VR graphics, they break the immersion for me. But AR stuff has had me way more immersed. And plus all I do in life is watch tv shows and movies and I love 3d, I always was a huge believer in 3d. So for me this will be my new way to watch amazing 3d and normal movies along with tv shows.
I’m similar but would never fork out four grand for a good media viewing device. The device needs more time in the oven and while it cooks, maybe in a year or two we get the non pro version for half the cost and can offer the same viewing experience. I agree it’ll be great but imo not going to shell out 4k for this device and will wait for a more mainstream release. Being an early adopter always comes with a bigger price tag. And look at something like the quest pro. It was the best vr device on the market for a bit until the quest 3 released a year or so later and does much of the same at half the cost. Way more people are buying the quest 3 than ever did the pro and it’s just the mainstream release. Same will happen here. Gotta get the right version of the thing you want but there isn’t much to do if it isn’t out yet.
@@LauroAbreu yeah I tried those on quest 3 and I wasn’t impressed with the quality. It’s really buggy a lot of times and the passthrough is super fuzzy which breaks the immersion
you must of had a bad set because I shouldn't of been blurry or buggy, mine runs like hot knife through warm butter. The Vision Pro Tech is impressive but its still a first run model and is so limited in its usability compared to the Quest 3. @@WhoKnowsZombie
Given the nature of the similarity of macos, ios, tvos, and the vision os, they must be doing something on purpose. Especially given the truth how ios apps used to be able to run smoothly on iPadOS, macos but developers suddenly decided not to let people use them. I don't know why, I don't understand why, but I have to be suspicious.
@@solanumtuberosa yes but also, no. If the vision pro isn't gonna have any apps or anything to make it differentiate itself from a macbook pro other than you wear it on your head and a different interface, may as well get a MBP where you have the apps to get stuff done. But that's just my opinion on the current outlook from this video.
@@JoshuaPackKinda agree. If you're thinking of multitasking or something as well you could get a MBP M3 or maybe M2 and splash out for a nice dock and monitors. Obviously it's not gonna be strapped to your face, but you definitely have a point here.
@@JoshuaPackthe difference is the way you “experience” the Apps. Zoom for example is a boring chat box on Mac but inside Vision Pro it’s like a total new thing complete with sharing 3d objects.
I bought it and I think it's dumb too maybe it's a start but that's about it I also own a full pcvr setup with full body tracking can do a lot more with my index and quest but who knows I still support it!
This had failure written all over it. 1. Obviously the price point. 2. It will not reach a large enough market share for developers to exclusively develop for it ( I mean in a larger way) It's going to have a much smaller percentage of the market compared to something like a quest 3. If you want to argue it's gaming and entertainment are side components of its use I think that's absolutely fine, however, its productivity component for professionals and tech bros also makes less sense (outside of niche applications) because the mouse and keyboard are far more efficient at actually doing these things related to work. It works the same way with high-end PCs and AAA gaming. Developers need to make their games more accessible to general hardware to generate a larger profit. 4. Apple has a minimal track record with gaming in general and would require a large investment to get exclusive games ( that matter or breakthrough) to truly show off the awesome capability of the computer's actual power. Apple's most famous gaming is losing Halo to Microsoft like 25 years ago, they have no relevant experience and gaming easily becomes a money pit. 5. If Apple was serious about the gaming side of things there would be a controller of sorts. It's incredibly limiting without it, probably sold separately though 5. If the Vision Pro is truly about work and productivity then these goggles are even more of a fad. Work is about work flow and wearing the goggles for 9 hours a day immediately sounds miserable to your average person. Not to mention with an external battery pack and cable.
Guys, you can't compare the iPhone launch to the vision pro. The iPhone came out at a completely different time when we didn't have all these apps/services that we have today. Back then, it was fine for a big tech luxury product to release with no software because none of that existed yet. The iPhone was also able to be considered not only a luxury product but a necessity cause it was still a phone. The vision pro coming out is 1000 percent a luxury purchase. I also wanna state that all the software that wasn't around then is now around today. The software just has to be Ported over. However, it also doesn't matter how cool or how expensive your gadget is, if it doesn't have software for it.
exactly, it was still A PHONE. It HAD a function already. App devs just added to it. The Vision is a solution w/o a problem. Literally no one asked for this and Apple cant even give you a solid use case. It simply cannot be justified at this time
Apple doesn't operate in millions, they operate in billions. Apple sold over 200 million iPhones in 2020 @ 800+ USD a piece. Which is $160,000,000,000 in the bank making a product people actually want. $25,500,000,000 was made from the iPhone's App Store that same year. How many billions did the headset make from re-sold software for it?
@@administrator4728 "The original iPhone, introduced in late June 2007 in the United States only, sold about 270,000 units in its first two days. Sales topped one million by early September" It's an apples to different kind of apples comparison. It's untested tech, at an insanely large price point. 180k sold before release and reviews and an affordable variant, I think, is pretty decent. We just have to wait until the end of the year to make any kind of judgment.
Project 400,000 by year end. Obviously that’s probably manufactured units, not units sold. But if they can sell those 400,000 units within a year or so, it is a good chunk of change.
God I love the community. (sarcasm) Mass hating on a product that hasn't launched yet won't do too much good. Time is the real answer, ladies and gentlemen.
Newsflash: it's NOT FOR MOST PEOPLE TO BUY. 🤦🏾♂️ If you're not a dev, enthusiast, content creator, or just plain rich... This iteration is NOT for you. But sit tight... Your iteration, will be cheaper, lighter, and more powerful. I PROMISE. But don't hate like that dude. He went waaaaaaaaaaaaay overboard. 🤷🏾♂️
LOL. When being critical to sound smart is so funny. It’s a fun toy first, fashion 2nd, utility last and for $3,500 that’s about right. In a world where Nike Red October’s $15-30K used… Hermes Birkin Bags are $20-40K… both brands are aligned with Apple. Bernard Hinault, is the first / second $207B richest man on the planet. What does he sell? Fashion. Apple combines fashion and tech. But you guys are young unfashionable tech nerds trying to be smart while forgetting how the world works. And if the above doesn’t ring a bell: Fashion and clothing is the #1 online purchase for the last 14 years.
Vision Pro is not a failure. It is doing EXACTLY what Apple needed: Getting developers to build AR apps for their FUTURE AR glasses. Yes, Vision pro it is a goofy, clunky thing with no mass appeal, priced into the stratosphere. That's missing the point entirely.
Apple is at least 10-15 years out IMO from bring most AVP specs down to a small pair of glasses. My guess is the smaller pair of glasses with have limited functionality. They seem to want to have this as a computer strapped to your face. Realistically, their main objective seems to bring down the price and drop the weight and increase battery life significantly.
@@Crowski Google Glass was a great product. Apple would say use their watch. But obviously you have to look at your wrist…an in between version of Google Glass and Vision Pro would be slick.
Reviewers don’t seem to understand that the tech inside is worth the price and that places it outside the budget. It’s not like the tech is equal to the quest 3 and Apple just wants to price gauge
While I don’t disagree. At that price point, what role does this product really fill? No device they hope it replaces sells for half as much. It’s a product without a use case that’s already priced itself out of any chance to generate a market.
@@pcallycat9043it would replace the role of a MacBook/ipad for most people. While unfortunate, most consumers don’t care about file systems or control, they want fast, easy access to their apps and immersion.
It doesn't matter if the tech inside is worth or not. It's still 3500 dollars which is insane for something being marketed as a mass consumer product. For 95% of the population that's a staggering amount of money for something that has not demonstrated a single thing it does that can't be done cheaper elsewhere.
People said the same thing when OLED tvs came out. They said the same thing about the iPAD and Iwatch. Your argument is just misinformed and ignorant. @@devilmikey00
it's basically early-access hardware... future generations will undoubtedly get cheaper and better, this is really for those who want to be (and can afford to be) on the bleeding edge
I tried one of these at the Apple store. I found reading interesting. Also, watching baseball was great as well as the nature videos. I was going to get one. I told myself I would wait until September. But no matter how many times I say that, I come back to telling myself it isn't worth it. What are ten big things you can do with the device that you can only do on it. I had a brain injury in 03 and was left with about 8% of my vision. So I cannot imagine watching an entire movie would be good for my eyes. For anyones actually. I have a Meta 3 for games. Which I rarely use. So, I would not watch movies or shows. I have a gaming heat set. I have a 32 inch Cintiq pro monitor to use with my Mac Studio and a 32 inch 4K Samsung TV. What in the hell would I need this headset for. As one who has been following tech for about twenty years, I understand it is a new release. Everything cannot just appear for the thing. But this is Apple. I would imagine they have the money are resources to make a handful of things for it. Yet, there really is nothing. So as exciting as it would be to buy the thing, after thinking about it for days and days, it just seems like a useless $3,500 device.
He can just say the Austin Evans channel instead of calling it the main channel. To me This Is is the main channel followed by Denki then the orther channel with short dude.
The tech and software setup is pretty impressive if they would only consider a cheaper consumer friendly version with less expensive materials and some of the bells and whistles removed like the eye display infront
Quest 3 and AVP have the same battery. Also everyone that said it’s heavy is ppl who don’t use vr. All the vr media ppl who tried it. Says it feels like every other headset. So let’s not get advice from none vr ppl
The VR goggles form factor is garbage. It doesn't matter how much padding there is, and no top strap can ever be enough. Smooshing a screen into your face is never going to be comfortable, especially not for hours. They need to go with a "halo" strap, because it basically fits like a hat, and it takes the weight off of your face. Also, why are these companies putting the battery and the computer inside the front of the headset instead of either something separate you put in your pocket, or on the back of the device? It's like these companies don't want VR to succeed.
They already made 720 million dollars. Isheeps will buy anything they sell, they will be fine, however they should sell this for 12500$ to make more profits and not 3500$ as isheeps will anyways buy this at any price.
Don’t see why you guys are so salty. The only other headset (Varjo) that pack as much pixel cost 4k to 10k. I am actually glad Apple is pushing tech forward.
Yes, most people wont buy this. I'm certain modders will make everything work on this you are saying is being wasted. I'm not gonna buy one, but hopefully it pushes others to beat it cheaper.
@@anythingoriginal better tech but a lack of usability. Again, I’m not arguing the fact that it’s better in performance (understandably the price as well) but rather how people would use it. Also other companies doesn’t really need to beat it, more affordable and usable headsets are already available in the market. A product can only disrupt the market if it’s simply superior in every category and the Apple Vision Pro has the performance, but not functionality and pricing.
@@khangvinh4656 It wasn't created to disrupt our market. Its designed to go up against Varjo and other business VR headsets that corporations buy to show products to people on the other side of the globe.
The point of AVP isnt for regular people, its not for gamers, its for people who love apple, are rich, and will probably keep as a collectors item. This will sell out of the 80k they make, and they can lower manufacturing costs in future generations, and Im all for pushing vr forward, eventually it will improve, get lighter, and more for regular folks, this is just the start
Y’all are standing on grapes I guarantee there will be a “I was wrong about avp” in about 2 weeks. I don’t even frequent so y’all casuals tag me again if I’m right
I want to point out that most people that can afford to get this for the "courtside" thing could probably just afford to sit courtside at a real game.😂
Most consumers do not want to walk around for hours every day with a brick strapped to their face, their is really no getting around that, so the price the $$ is not even the biggest problem.
3500 USD for a vr headset that will have the controller bought separately
It's the cameras that make it expensive
I feel like apple is missing the point of vr
NOT VR it's SPACIAL COMPUTING, Blahahahaahahahha
@@raytherrien2851 lmao
@@raytherrien2851Went to the Apple Store and asked about the laptops they had, they said “we don’t sell laptops, we sell MacBooks” that was like 10 years ago and it still confuses me to this day
The problem is that I can bring my smartphone everywhere I go and do virtually anything with the tens of million of Apps available. But Vision Pro applications are very limited and the user experience on many Apps would definitely poorer than using your smartphone. I think Vison Pro may have a future, but such future could be another 10 years away until the headset can be reduced to the size of a pair of glasses where carrying it and wearing it will not be a burden.
$3500 is a LOT of money for a LOT of people, considering the rapidly rising costs of living, and in other countries it's going to be selling for more, expect in Canada a price near $5000. Yeah, right...
I just searched vision pro memes and I'm here lollll but really.... Not burning my money for this. I'll buy a car
Remember Apple wants you to ditch your PC and the Ipad was a replacement..lol. Apple reality vs. real reality.
Wait what. They never wanted you to do that.
That was never the marketing for the iPad brother.
I actually bought the xreal air 2 pro glasses, and been using it for a couple of days,
ill tell you right now, its not perfect,
but playing games and watching movies on them is just surreal,
120 inch micro oled display (1080p unfortunately)inside a 75 gram sun glasses is amazing, and wearing them doesn't make you look like you are from space.
and sure they are expensive as well at $450 but its nothing compared to the price of the vision pro.
also there is xreal beam which is an external device that can do spatial computing to make it so that the screen stays in place and increase the size of it to 300 inch.
I have not tried it yet, so i can't tell if its any good. still for my use case it feels like a better deal than the vision pro.
I just can’t see a use case this product fills at $3500…. not when anything it’s trying to replace can be had for 20% of that price.
It's not trying to replace anything. It's trying to introduce spatial computing
@@CrustyHead2465 It's a vr headset... damn cool one, don't get me wrong, but at $3500 the only thing they are introducing is a new patent portfolio. The average consumer isn't the target audience, but without the average consumer on board, they are going to be hard pressed to find developers willing to sink time and money into developing anything but standard desktop apps for it... in which case.. they are basically an Oculus, with a 1000% markup
the practical applications of it are essentially a less productive computer that you wear over your eyes for 8 hours to do your work, that you drag an external battery around with. @@CrustyHead2465
Can't wait for them to sell all the in box free stuff separately in the next version
These jokers act like $3500 is a hindrance to purchasing this item. Early adopters are exactly the consumer base that will pay that price. Blah blah blah.
This is a joke of a video. Needlessly inflammatory and hyperbolic. Many people make more than enough money to justify this purchase as a fun toy - myself included. This product is packed with innovation. The fact is that if it were $1k you wouldn't be talking all of this shit. You're just doing what is popular, easy, and gets clicks.
GREAT JOB GUYS!
the vision pro needs a big new application that we cant yet do with the Quest 3, but so far there isn't.
with quest 3 we already have AR, 3D movies/shows, games, productivity apps and more, for 1/5 of the price, the only thing vision pro have rn is disney+ and face time...?
it really doesnt make any sense to buy this RIGHT NOW, but maybe in the future there will be some apps that can only run in this, but i really think this will flop and only the next interation of this will be actually cool
Its not for gaming as everyone keeps screaming about. If it was Apple would need to make massive investments in securing first-party exclusives for it , because developers aren't going to want to develop exclusively for such a small market share.
bro really starting to act like Steve Balmer in '07
😂 comparing an iPad to the vision pro is wild. Y’all are hilarious
Judging by the price it should be serving more than just consuming contents.. and iPad does serve more than just consuming contents..
Yeah the iPad actually has software for it.
I mean tech space and Austin are very anti iPad despite how much students are actually using them.
its funny to see people using this outside i will make random gesture to troll them
Is like comparing rock = ipad to Spaceship = Vision Pro.
if there is no quest 3, then the vision would be cool. it's 7x the price of quest 3 but not even 2x better for sure.
Exactly. Watching reviewers drool because they can pinch and drag things around in their room is cringe worthy. Quest has been doing that for years now.
in what way it's better? yiu can do barely nothing with this crap, it's for dummy apple boys
@@BiggNewtI don’t think it’s the existence of the features, but how refined those features are that makes reviewers drool. On paper, the Apple Vision Pro doesn’t do anything new but it combines a lot of niche things into an almost “super vr headset” that has a lot of capability.
@@JustDestiny260 super vr headset 😂 it's a AR headset that's an average VR headset.
@@JustDestiny260 super vr headset that doesn’t even do vr but 2d screens. Can’t even game on it. Shitty fov. Major disappointment
I'm in search of the perfect gear for my upcoming winter skiing adventure. Any recommendations?
I just watched a breakdown of the actual cost of the device, and believe it or not, the device is unpriced. The hate on this is outrageous. He says, "It doesn't even last more than two hours" Yeah, neither does the Quest 3. The Quest pro and Vive are also heavier. It's just a bunch of opinion and conjecture. People will bash, and people will overhype this. Time is the only thing that will tell us how this plays out.
Lmaooo you just compared 600usd devices to a 3500usd device you'd think that the vision pro would make battery improvements with that price tag, instead it's another glorified metal paper weight with a designer logo (Apple)
@@CyanLucifer The comparison is quite good because the power draw of the Vision Pro as a 3500 device is much higher. It is running two chips and dual 4k screens.
Agreed that the hate isn't useful, but there's no point in acting like anyone should get it either. It's a beta product for a test audience, not at all meant for general consumers yet.
if you have $3500 for a headset, you have an extra hundred for a battery bank to put in your pocket instead of wearing the extra weight on your face. @@CyanLucifer
@@CyanLucifer You are exactly correct lmao. It's funny see people justify VP when it is just a glorified vr headset.
How can you say something is uncomfortable to wear when you have never worn it?
Is it that much to assume that if people are saying it's heavy and uncomfortable that it is, in fact, heavy and uncomfortable?
@@IceYetiWinswell I personally follow all major te h channels and its 50/50% opinion
It's uncomfortable.the standard strap will cut the upperside if your ear.
I bought it and I’m not really a content creator, I do have 159k on IG but that’s for like jackass stunts type stuff so I won’t post about it on there. But I do plan on making a video for my channel with 30 subs mainly because that’s a channel I just post on for fun and don’t take it serious. But I bought one because I always wanted a really good AR device. I thought Microsoft holo lens was cool until I started to think more and more about how everything you see is see through. I personally like AR way more than VR because I’m not impressed with VR graphics, they break the immersion for me. But AR stuff has had me way more immersed. And plus all I do in life is watch tv shows and movies and I love 3d, I always was a huge believer in 3d. So for me this will be my new way to watch amazing 3d and normal movies along with tv shows.
I’m similar but would never fork out four grand for a good media viewing device. The device needs more time in the oven and while it cooks, maybe in a year or two we get the non pro version for half the cost and can offer the same viewing experience. I agree it’ll be great but imo not going to shell out 4k for this device and will wait for a more mainstream release. Being an early adopter always comes with a bigger price tag. And look at something like the quest pro. It was the best vr device on the market for a bit until the quest 3 released a year or so later and does much of the same at half the cost. Way more people are buying the quest 3 than ever did the pro and it’s just the mainstream release. Same will happen here. Gotta get the right version of the thing you want but there isn’t much to do if it isn’t out yet.
for AR and watch 3D stuff you also have the Quest 3 for 1/5 of the price, that doesnt make any sense
@@LauroAbreu yeah I tried those on quest 3 and I wasn’t impressed with the quality. It’s really buggy a lot of times and the passthrough is super fuzzy which breaks the immersion
you must of had a bad set because I shouldn't of been blurry or buggy, mine runs like hot knife through warm butter. The Vision Pro Tech is impressive but its still a first run model and is so limited in its usability compared to the Quest 3. @@WhoKnowsZombie
bruh comparing a new computing method to legacy stuff is cringe
see you in 10 years when everyone have this thing on their head
He just compared Nreal 3Dof compared to vr. What a fool lol.
Given the nature of the similarity of macos, ios, tvos, and the vision os, they must be doing something on purpose. Especially given the truth how ios apps used to be able to run smoothly on iPadOS, macos but developers suddenly decided not to let people use them. I don't know why, I don't understand why, but I have to be suspicious.
I mean, for 3,500 bucks, and you want Apple, buy the new M3 MBP
Different use cases. Its like saying buy the steam deck instead of the valve index.
@@solanumtuberosa yes but also, no. If the vision pro isn't gonna have any apps or anything to make it differentiate itself from a macbook pro other than you wear it on your head and a different interface, may as well get a MBP where you have the apps to get stuff done. But that's just my opinion on the current outlook from this video.
@@JoshuaPackKinda agree. If you're thinking of multitasking or something as well you could get a MBP M3 or maybe M2 and splash out for a nice dock and monitors. Obviously it's not gonna be strapped to your face, but you definitely have a point here.
@@JoshuaPackthe people like me who bought Vision Pro ALREADY have Apple silicon MBPs.
@@JoshuaPackthe difference is the way you “experience” the Apps. Zoom for example is a boring chat box on Mac but inside Vision Pro it’s like a total new thing complete with sharing 3d objects.
Big guy remains me when the first iphone came out. “Who needs a phone without a real keyboard”
I bought it and I think it's dumb too maybe it's a start but that's about it I also own a full pcvr setup with full body tracking can do a lot more with my index and quest but who knows I still support it!
Yeah its just making you more productive and active live styles.. inside your house..
"You need people to be like yo this is amazing" is something apple really hasn't considered. Please apply for a job at their marketing department.
This had failure written all over it.
1. Obviously the price point.
2. It will not reach a large enough market share for developers to exclusively develop for it ( I mean in a larger way) It's going to have a much smaller percentage of the market compared to something like a quest
3. If you want to argue it's gaming and entertainment are side components of its use I think that's absolutely fine, however, its productivity component for professionals and tech bros also makes less sense (outside of niche applications) because the mouse and keyboard are far more efficient at actually doing these things related to work. It works the same way with high-end PCs and AAA gaming. Developers need to make their games more accessible to general hardware to generate a larger profit.
4. Apple has a minimal track record with gaming in general and would require a large investment to get exclusive games ( that matter or breakthrough) to truly show off the awesome capability of the computer's actual power. Apple's most famous gaming is losing Halo to Microsoft like 25 years ago, they have no relevant experience and gaming easily becomes a money pit.
5. If Apple was serious about the gaming side of things there would be a controller of sorts. It's incredibly limiting without it, probably sold separately though
5. If the Vision Pro is truly about work and productivity then these goggles are even more of a fad. Work is about work flow and wearing the goggles for 9 hours a day immediately sounds miserable to your average person. Not to mention with an external battery pack and cable.
I recently watched a well-made review describing how the goggles were actually designed to fail, and it was designed to flop like Lisa.
Guys, you can't compare the iPhone launch to the vision pro. The iPhone came out at a completely different time when we didn't have all these apps/services that we have today. Back then, it was fine for a big tech luxury product to release with no software because none of that existed yet. The iPhone was also able to be considered not only a luxury product but a necessity cause it was still a phone. The vision pro coming out is 1000 percent a luxury purchase. I also wanna state that all the software that wasn't around then is now around today. The software just has to be Ported over. However, it also doesn't matter how cool or how expensive your gadget is, if it doesn't have software for it.
As soon as they compared the iPad to the vision pro, at that point I stopped listening
Yeah, i'm sure they just "ported over" the OS for the Vision Pro. That's all 😂
@@KJ-ql4nm kinda insane honestly.
exactly, it was still A PHONE. It HAD a function already. App devs just added to it. The Vision is a solution w/o a problem. Literally no one asked for this and Apple cant even give you a solid use case. It simply cannot be justified at this time
@@mely598 the iPhone was definitely in that sweet spot of being a luxury item but also needed. The vision pro is completely just a luxury item.
Video: no Apps in Vision Pro
Developers who already submitted their App: excuse me? We don’t exist?
Ikr. There will be over 200 native apps and over 1 million iPad apps available at launch. These guys are lost.
@@tiagomaqzwhy run an iPad app on a headset? The resolution of the virtual display will be less than you get on the iPad.
@@robertp457 Why watch a movie on a bigscreen or in a movie theatre? Do you realize how obvious the answer is?
@@robertp457 On paper, maybe, but how often will you notice during actual use?
How long until OLED burn in on vision pro?
i think they gon use vision pro technology for future products. this is only for early adopters
ya think
Get better jobs, afford better things.
Is failled already?
It failed when they announced the price.
@@robertbowling3679 you're all so stupid
English is scary
Matt is NOT missing out without Netflix, I'm tired of people praising such a disaster of a company.
Austin is right because the apple watch wasn't a good product either but was kind of forced into existence through marketing alone
180,000 units sold at $3,500 a pop, so $630,000,000 in the bank so far
Apple doesn't operate in millions, they operate in billions. Apple sold over 200 million iPhones in 2020 @ 800+ USD a piece. Which is $160,000,000,000 in the bank making a product people actually want. $25,500,000,000 was made from the iPhone's App Store that same year.
How many billions did the headset make from re-sold software for it?
@@administrator4728
"The original iPhone, introduced in late June 2007 in the United States only, sold about 270,000 units in its first two days. Sales topped one million by early September"
It's an apples to different kind of apples comparison. It's untested tech, at an insanely large price point. 180k sold before release and reviews and an affordable variant, I think, is pretty decent.
We just have to wait until the end of the year to make any kind of judgment.
Project 400,000 by year end. Obviously that’s probably manufactured units, not units sold. But if they can sell those 400,000 units within a year or so, it is a good chunk of change.
That’s revenue not profit
@@administrator4728200 million is global , they only released this in usa
The Apple Vision Pro is yet another "product" trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
Stop cutting Austin off. He lets you speak in peace... Have respect
You’re right. AVP will never get a Netflix app…come on guys
God I love the community. (sarcasm)
Mass hating on a product that hasn't launched yet won't do too much good. Time is the real answer, ladies and gentlemen.
Sounds like some guys couldn't fork over the dough
Newsflash: it's NOT FOR MOST PEOPLE TO BUY. 🤦🏾♂️
If you're not a dev, enthusiast, content creator, or just plain rich... This iteration is NOT for you. But sit tight... Your iteration, will be cheaper, lighter, and more powerful. I PROMISE. But don't hate like that dude. He went waaaaaaaaaaaaay overboard. 🤷🏾♂️
If you loose you charge cable you fxxed because it’s specific for the vision pro
Cable sold separately for 999 usd
Matt always being wrong. Is a good sign for Apple Vision Pro lol
I wouldn’t call Apple people “dumb” while making inaccurate statements about it. Loud and wrong.
There’s not going to be ANY apps! 😂 talk about exaggeration just for engagement. These hot takes will not age well 😂
I hate that Austin keeps interrupting his companion, completely unprofessional.
LOL. When being critical to sound smart is so funny. It’s a fun toy first, fashion 2nd, utility last and for $3,500 that’s about right. In a world where Nike Red October’s $15-30K used… Hermes Birkin Bags are $20-40K… both brands are aligned with Apple.
Bernard Hinault, is the first / second $207B richest man on the planet. What does he sell? Fashion. Apple combines fashion and tech. But you guys are young unfashionable tech nerds trying to be smart while forgetting how the world works.
And if the above doesn’t ring a bell: Fashion and clothing is the #1 online purchase for the last 14 years.
Vision Pro is not a failure. It is doing EXACTLY what Apple needed: Getting developers to build AR apps for their FUTURE AR glasses.
Yes, Vision pro it is a goofy, clunky thing with no mass appeal, priced into the stratosphere. That's missing the point entirely.
So it's a beta product that's overpriced?
*The Vision Pro will go the way of Google Glass. Paying $3500 for something that isn't ready yet is foolish.*
This is why I wanted the google glasses 🤓
Dude ... go to GoodWill and make yourself an 80s room 💀
The new pippin.
You both will eat your words like allllllllll the others who said the iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch were going to fail
look at these losers...
They need to make apple glasses….something everyday people would actually use.
Apple is at least 10-15 years out IMO from bring most AVP specs down to a small pair of glasses. My guess is the smaller pair of glasses with have limited functionality. They seem to want to have this as a computer strapped to your face. Realistically, their main objective seems to bring down the price and drop the weight and increase battery life significantly.
@@doompod eh I just want a visual hub for notifications and gps on the go where I don’t have to pull out my phone or even bring it with me.
@@Crowski Google Glass was a great product. Apple would say use their watch. But obviously you have to look at your wrist…an in between version of Google Glass and Vision Pro would be slick.
Watching this video on my quest 3 😂
So 3500 dollars at 180k people just banked them 630 million dollars?
Finally somebody same minded.. Im waiting for Sony Vr aimed for creators
The guy on the left thinks people are buying VR just to watch RUclips.
Most people who buy vr use it for gaming. Apple is not advertising it for gaming. So it is not far fetch to say they are really selling water to fish.
That’s basically all you can do with the vision pro. Watching videos
Reviewers don’t seem to understand that the tech inside is worth the price and that places it outside the budget. It’s not like the tech is equal to the quest 3 and Apple just wants to price gauge
While I don’t disagree. At that price point, what role does this product really fill? No device they hope it replaces sells for half as much. It’s a product without a use case that’s already priced itself out of any chance to generate a market.
@@pcallycat9043it would replace the role of a MacBook/ipad for most people. While unfortunate, most consumers don’t care about file systems or control, they want fast, easy access to their apps and immersion.
It doesn't matter if the tech inside is worth or not. It's still 3500 dollars which is insane for something being marketed as a mass consumer product. For 95% of the population that's a staggering amount of money for something that has not demonstrated a single thing it does that can't be done cheaper elsewhere.
People said the same thing when OLED tvs came out. They said the same thing about the iPAD and Iwatch. Your argument is just misinformed and ignorant. @@devilmikey00
it's basically early-access hardware... future generations will undoubtedly get cheaper and better, this is really for those who want to be (and can afford to be) on the bleeding edge
Just like that oculous shhht...will come and go...steamdeck' is the ONLY way 💯🤘😎
I tried one of these at the Apple store. I found reading interesting. Also, watching baseball was great as well as the nature videos. I was going to get one. I told myself I would wait until September. But no matter how many times I say that, I come back to telling myself it isn't worth it. What are ten big things you can do with the device that you can only do on it. I had a brain injury in 03 and was left with about 8% of my vision. So I cannot imagine watching an entire movie would be good for my eyes. For anyones actually. I have a Meta 3 for games. Which I rarely use. So, I would not watch movies or shows. I have a gaming heat set. I have a 32 inch Cintiq pro monitor to use with my Mac Studio and a 32 inch 4K Samsung TV. What in the hell would I need this headset for.
As one who has been following tech for about twenty years, I understand it is a new release. Everything cannot just appear for the thing. But this is Apple. I would imagine they have the money are resources to make a handful of things for it. Yet, there really is nothing. So as exciting as it would be to buy the thing, after thinking about it for days and days, it just seems like a useless $3,500 device.
Why couldn't they just make a phone that turns into a tablet and laptop
The best computer without software is just a brick.Apple is nuts
Love the creepy ASMR ending lol... 😂😂
Keeps saying there are cheaper options but none of those options have that crazy resolution, ux. ui, and eco system.
cheapest vr headset in universe
It might be a great headset but that price will be the reason it failed not the device.
He can just say the Austin Evans channel instead of calling it the main channel. To me This Is is the main channel followed by Denki then the orther channel with short dude.
If your into vr. You’re buying this headset. Like I did
The tech and software setup is pretty impressive if they would only consider a cheaper consumer friendly version with less expensive materials and some of the bells and whistles removed like the eye display infront
And voilla you have quest pro with games, alll the Apps you ever wanted.
You get a like for Matt's Rochester shirt.
Oh boy, it's you who have already failed.
9:43 min..........................FOR ALMOST 2 HOURS
........ BEWERE ❤😂😂😂
Quest 3 and AVP have the same battery. Also everyone that said it’s heavy is ppl who don’t use vr. All the vr media ppl who tried it. Says it feels like every other headset. So let’s not get advice from none vr ppl
Never heard more consecutive worse takes in a 10 minute youtube video ever... Comparing Vision Pro to an iPad?? Off on this one
closest the TI-86 will ever come to running TikTok is playing back
It will be another Apple tv product, not for everyone
finally an honest conversation about the apple vision pro.
is this apple's version of the holo-lens?
Max and Paramount+ are also all in on this with their own optimised VR apps including unique environments based on WB and Paramount IP.
Apple is basically testing us IF WE ARE DUMB enough to buy a screen that kisses your face
"Does anyone use apps on watch"
Idk, but if not and only use fitness everyone should buy Garmin/Suunto etc. instead with 5-20x the battery life.
You can get the same transportation with a Camaro that you can get with a Ferrari, what' your point lol
The VR goggles form factor is garbage. It doesn't matter how much padding there is, and no top strap can ever be enough. Smooshing a screen into your face is never going to be comfortable, especially not for hours. They need to go with a "halo" strap, because it basically fits like a hat, and it takes the weight off of your face. Also, why are these companies putting the battery and the computer inside the front of the headset instead of either something separate you put in your pocket, or on the back of the device? It's like these companies don't want VR to succeed.
They already made 720 million dollars. Isheeps will buy anything they sell, they will be fine, however they should sell this for 12500$ to make more profits and not 3500$ as isheeps will anyways buy this at any price.
Don’t see why you guys are so salty. The only other headset (Varjo) that pack as much pixel cost 4k to 10k. I am actually glad Apple is pushing tech forward.
Ready Player Zero
This is me regretting have ever met you
I pre-ordered and I’m not a content creator
I used my xreal for spatial computing and watched videos on a large screen for $400
Who wants to wear a computer on their head?
Yes, most people wont buy this. I'm certain modders will make everything work on this you are saying is being wasted. I'm not gonna buy one, but hopefully it pushes others to beat it cheaper.
It’s a glorified VR headset with AR functionality. Apple can’t even compete with past product at this price point.
@@khangvinh4656 It's almost like better technology costs more.
@@anythingoriginal better tech but a lack of usability. Again, I’m not arguing the fact that it’s better in performance (understandably the price as well) but rather how people would use it. Also other companies doesn’t really need to beat it, more affordable and usable headsets are already available in the market. A product can only disrupt the market if it’s simply superior in every category and the Apple Vision Pro has the performance, but not functionality and pricing.
@@khangvinh4656 It wasn't created to disrupt our market. Its designed to go up against Varjo and other business VR headsets that corporations buy to show products to people on the other side of the globe.
Quest 3 is far superior to the apple vision pro CHANGE MY MIND!
The point of AVP isnt for regular people, its not for gamers, its for people who love apple, are rich, and will probably keep as a collectors item. This will sell out of the 80k they make, and they can lower manufacturing costs in future generations, and Im all for pushing vr forward, eventually it will improve, get lighter, and more for regular folks, this is just the start
Y’all are standing on grapes I guarantee there will be a “I was wrong about avp” in about 2 weeks. I don’t even frequent so y’all casuals tag me again if I’m right
I dont use apple products but I want this to succeed so vr really truly hits mainstream and we get good games.
Let’s be honest it’s not. It’s $3,499.00 no one will pay THAT MUCH. For a vr headset.
@@lewisgrant7622 Already sold 200k units in pre-orders.
@@lewisgrant7622200k units already sold so….
@@lewisgrant7622I did.
We already have good games. Asgard's Wrath 2 is the best game on any platform in 2023
Did you fill spec it out?