how nft bros want society to work
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- hi if you dont know what an nft is its basically like digital art right and you can buy it for 500000 $$$ and its officially yours except since it's digital it LITERALLY CAN BE OWNED BY ANYONE AND SCREENSHOTTING IT CAN DECREASE THE VALUE SO WHATS THE POINT OF IT. WHAT'S THE POINT OF AN NFT. PLEASE EXPLAIN. SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT THE POINT OF AN NFT IS EXCEPT TO LIGHT AN ENTIRE AMAZONIAN RAINFOREST ON FIRE. WE'RE LIVING IN A NIGHTMARE. GET ME OUT OF HERE GET ME OUT OF HERE GET ME OUT OF HERE
voice actors:
/ ellbobxd
other stuff:
♢ TWITCH: / squizxy
♢ TWITTER: / squizxy
♢ INSTAGRAM: / squiz.xy
#animation #nft #squizzy
In 80 years, everyone's inheritance will be a worthless collection of Rick and Morty NFTs
At least they’ll have sentimental value to someone
That is If humanity survives for 80 more years
@@ashtasheran6970 it wont
@Holl ywood shut up bot.
we can tell you filled in the text in the beginning by the bold all-caps text of their name.
I mean- anything to complain about?
Seeing NFT people just hurts me mentally lmao.
like how do they manage...
Let’s see to it that they don’t manage…
@@ACE-si4ng based
They don’t even know themselves
Monkey
See
Monkey
Do
I buy NFTs, some of it is a fad, but some of it isn't.
my art teachers when they see digital art: "you should sell that as an nft"
the students: -_-
MY ART TEACHER DOES THAT LMFAO
Tell the principal to fire them immediately
My parents do this, I don’t have anything against NFT’S (cause I don’t understand them) but most of them are hella ugly, I’ve seen some good ones but whoever is selling them just copy-pastes that same image for all of their NFT’S. But it’s annoying having someone tell what to do every five seconds when I’m not concerned about anything money related or social media related; it’s like having someone hover over you and repeatedly tell you to do your chores even while your doing them.
@@buttonsbox2476 Don't ever turn your art into NFTs if you value it
You should make this video an NFT
you should make me your first reply
you should make this comment an NFT
@@s_0lace you should make your reply an nft
Genius
You genius
Someone should make a bot that automatically detects NFTs and spreads copies/screenshots of them literally everywhere on the internet lol
theres something similar on twitter
when you see an image you can write "i want this on a t-shirt" or something and a bot comments the link of the image on a tshirt to buy
someone do it
with pleaseure
I thought that was already a thing
Then we have to see the ugly ass art everywhere.
I hadn't really seen NFTs before, just heard of them, and when I saw those NFTs at the end of the video I was surprised by how incredibly lazy they are, it's like a character creator where you can select different options. Those monkeys have the exact same eyes, the exact same shape, the exact same pose, the exact same robot body, they're more worthless than I expected
I think there’s actually a creator for the NFT monkeys on piccrew, but the person who made it actually hates them, I don’t know if it was taken down or not
I don't know what NFT is either i been looking it up and shit and my brain just hurts lol
Technically it can be anything digital...
Just like half of them use it just for the same ugly picture.
i want to steal all of the assets used for nft's
so that i can literally just. make a simple character creator for it
Nft is like when you're a kid and you try to sell your crayon drawings to your uncle for 20 bucks.
Selling poorly made rainbow drawing with high quality crayons!!1!1!1! Only for 7989.90000 dolleris 🤗🤗🤗
Well at least it's better than burning resources that affects green house gases
This but the paper needed to have 1 million trees cut to be made and your uncle doesn't actually get the drawing he gets a little paper with "you own little Timmy's drawing congrats :)"
But even that's a better investment in NFTs
More than 20-
as an artist that thinks no art is bad/ugly majority of NFT's are ugly
Yeah some of them really put no effort. It look like draw by 1-2 minute at most.
good, better for this shit to die as fast as possible before it fucks copyright in worst sense possible to oblivion and no fucking art will be allowed to be created
Because they are NOT art
It's usually random images cobbled together as far as I've noticed. Like a character creation tool but for profit
It's the lowest of the low quality effort. Not to mention they also steal/trace/impersonate from other artists
I remember a post of a artist saying that someone commissioned him a art for $1000, which is nice, but the client proceeded to turn it into a NFT and SOLD IT FOR MORE (idk I think it was $100000), SHITTIEST PART IS THAT THE ARTIST DIDN'T GET ANY OF IT, CLIENT DIDN'T EVEN TOLD HIM THAT IT WAS TURNED INTO A NFT
u snooze u lose
tbf if my art was like, $50 for line-art, or unshaded basic colors, then I wouldn't give a shit if someone paid me $1k for that and then made it an NFT.
@@someweeb3650 it wasnt a lineart, the art was really really good
@@HaiiroCh Yeah, I just said lineart since high quality from a known artist will charge that much
I mean, did the client buy the art's copyright? That's a lot of money for a commission that doesn't come with rights. If they did, then it's not really the artist's business how the client profited from it. If they didn't, then the artist should sue, that's lawsuit-tier money. Either way, maybe the artist should consider selling NFTs directly from now on, it sounds more profitable.
Theoretical question. Could you say, sell one monke NFT for $500,000, and then spend all that money on hiring people to screw up the blockchain somehow?
I have no clue how this stuff works but that sounds like it would be fun to watch, NFTs seriously gotta die off already-
I'm pretty sure that if you bribe 50% of the miners or something you can screw everything up
Okay but how would you screw up the block chain
Do you even know what that means
@@tubach1082 It has already been done on several smaller blockchains. All you need to do is hijack more than half the nodes and get them to replace the ledger with your own one and suddenly your word is truth to the blockchain.
You saying that 20 thousand dollars for a monkey pic isn't a good deal?!?!?!
How much NFT do I have to pay for u to frame the thumbnail and send it to me
foekoe i'll pay you 0.01$ to send me a screenshotted nft
Hey look it’s funny hollow knight man.
It certainly is! Who wants to get stuff for free? Yuck. bUy MoRE nFT'S :^)
You can’t put a price like that on real art
you can either
A: lift thousands of people out of extreme poverty
B: buy a jpeg that you can have for literally free
cool, rich people spend millions on regular art. a banksy painting sold for millions, got half shredded at auction, and then sold for like 4x the original price after being shredded. art is stupid, you can either be salty or try to profit off the digital art craze going on.
@@sirspookington just because Banksy did that shit to his mediocre rat graffiti doesn't mean it's good art or not a waste of money, he proved his point with shredding his art to show how dumb people are that will buy anything if it's "countercultural", which is funny since all his art is very generic "peas and loaves" shit
The funniest thing ive ever seen was an NFT bro trying to tell his NFT pals that someone "stole" his NFT by dowloading the image, and then being completely baffled when he found out he doesn't actually own the photo, he only owns the blockchain attached to the URL.
Thats kinda sounds like bitcoin?
@@MinhNguyen-zr8zq I mean, yeah it is. Its a wasteful form of crypto currency stapled onto a url for a picture.
Its bad for the environment because of how much more power it requires to maintain a picture's monetary value on a blockchain.
@@jackmcmorrow9397 so if it didn't require more power than let's say; normal internet usage. You would think it's OK?
That's actually very sad, the guy probably got scammed into this.
@@moskwitoe not really, nfts are just another way to launder money and deceive people who doesn't know any better. Not to mention the amount of stolen artwork in there, most nfts are those shitty character randomizer and stolen art. There are very little legit nfts that actually looks great and actually original.
That’s a cool looking NFT you have there.
Y’all mind if I… *_Right Click and Save As?_*
i cant wait for all the "its not the same thing" comments
*snorts* "ahem, its not the same thing"
"BuT CaN YoU SeLl iT?"
-NFT copelords, 2021
@@zappyyz6368 I mean one costs a lot less, is less harmful to the environment and is just as valid so….
"actually, thats not the same thing ☝️🤓"
Just get a commission!
They're much more cost-effective!
Seeing NFT traders show every bit of pure, unadulterated rage at the _screenshot_ feature of all things has become my new favorite pastime.
i can't believe how many people unironically believe this lol.
This comment finna goes hard, feel free to copy
It’s even funnier because, if what NFT guys think is actually true, than taking screenshots of their NFTs shouldn’t even matter, since they have the “original” copy.
It’s not like people can take pictures of the Mona Lisa, and they suddenly have a copy that’s equal in value. If the NFT is as valuable as they claim, than recreations or false copies shouldn’t have an impact on its inherent value.
@@snowballeffect7812 honestly though. People actually believing in NFTs is just depressing.
@@gregjayonnaise8314 they dont own it. They own the receipt. Its embarrassing
0:13 Now thanks to this video, I, an Italian, have discovered that the joke "Go to work in the mine, good-for-nothing youngster!" it is not only Italian but planetary. Thank you so much Squizzy. Thank you with all my heart. :)
NFTs are literally "What if picrew was bad and a pump and dump scheme?"
no, it's more like the physical art market democratized and made open to the plebs, thus leading to a speculation and feeding frenzy. same thing happens with paintings, but no one cares how billionaires evade taxes. A 20x20 pixel bitmap sold for 10,000 USD, though? We gotta tell people as much misinformation about the tech behind that as possible!
Money laundering moment
@@snowballeffect7812 Uh oh, guys? I think we found one.
@@Vesperad0 i don't own nft's. i just understand how they work and don't feel the need to lie about it like some sort of anti-vaxxer
@@snowballeffect7812 yo we got a wise one
The people buying the artwork of the same characters with slight changes to them is almost cult-like. As soon as they buy it, they have to make a post on Twitter about it (which it will be shit on by other people who will right click and save it, or screenshot it which is 100% deserved) and make it their profile picture. And they all look like some generic Playstation/Nintendo/Xbox online profile image that everyone chooses when making an account. Like I'd rather buy the rights to owning a piece of art so I would have full control over it with legal backing behind it saying that I own it. NFTs have no legal backing behind it currently. And I strongly hope it stays that way for the profile picture ones. All the ones that are original and individual drawings are kind of fine by me.
It's almost cult like how much money it makes too.
This is the #1 response from people who either got in the game too late, or refuse to get in the game.
If you can't beat em join em. These NFTs are making more money for us than the top creators on Onlyfans make so theres that.
buyers remorse, like how people that got into Earth 2 just keeps digging down. If they inflate their ego enough, they'll forget they wasted a grand or two on funny pictures,
@PlokTheMasterGamer but are you selling them or just keeping it to have it? I feel buying some intellectual property and licensing it out to people for money is worth it more because people will have a stronger liking to it and have legal backing to it than how NFTs are now. You own a hash that has an asset tied to it, but you don't own the asset itself in legal terms. It isn't being late to the game that is the problem, it is the people who want to force it around as much as they can to try and get others to chase down the same rabbit hole only to break their necks on the bottom before they even got a chance to start digging down as well.
But all in all, my take is that if you want to spend your money on art, at least figure out if it can be monetized properly without any strings attached that you forgot to cut before buying it. Intellectual Property rights > a single NFT.
Why spend $100,000 on "ownership" of a bland AI-generated drawing that somehow uses up as much energy as a house, when you can spend .1% of that on an actual artist drawing something for you! It can be actually suited to your tastes, and there's no excessive energy consumption!
The illusion of status through exclusivity.
Because if NFTs werent so goddamn expensive for whatever fuckin reason these morons would think "cheap = crappy, and bland hurr durr"
I love people in the comments who dont understand crypto and investing, complaining about what other people spend their money on. You dont HAVE to spend your money on nfts, so why complain about what other people do. And btw, look up investing. Its a thing where you buy something for one price and sell it for a higher price. Its actually a genius way of making money.
@@fisk33a Reddit moment
@@fisk33a "You don't HAVE to spend money on NFTs" defeats the entire purpose of NFTs. They're money-laundering energy-consuming schemes, and the only reason people buy them is the promise that you can re-sell it and profit. It's a stupid loophole in reality, I don't _care_ if anybody thinks they can profit on it. It's making the stupidly rich even richer while simultaneously burning forests. This reality is a fucking nightmare.
fucking lost it at the screaming at the end god help my sense of humor
same bro 💀
it has no right to be that funny yet it is
Unexpected anger funny :|
Like he just couldn't even anymore like he just fucking went IN on their asses and fuck me it was amazing lmao.
That scream really represent my distaste for NFT. These are just a tasteless arts with ridiculous price.
haha wow! This animation is so funny! I sure do hope this woman is not an abuser who has a history of abusing their past 3 lovers, and holding the most recent one at knifepoint! Along with guiltripping, saying shes gonna kill herself and her lover leaves her for being abusive. Along with bouncing some heads off of a wall. Not to mention the mental abuse. Wow! Sure hope that never happens!!!
ikr
That would be incredibly unfortunate
Can someone inform me on why there are so much of these comments on every video? I seriously don’t know if I missed something or not
@@flashtmdvenom yes
To what?
Ah yes spend $50K on a JPG of a monkey rather than spend $40 for actual decent art that's custom-made
Small brain: buying an expensive JPEG
Big brain: buying a cheap JPEG
Galaxy brain: buying a cheap JPEG and having it physically printed and hanging it up on your wall
@@fenn_fren the best appreciation for any art piece imo
@@fenn_fren it's just basic art collector shit. same thing people said about the first moron who bought a Picasso.
Actually they dont buy the JPG the creator still owns it. An NFT is a receipt. Thats it.
They aren’t buying it because it looks nice
Cryptonerds be like: Hey guys, look the exclusive one of kind restraining order I just got
@Holl ywood h
OOooO
@Holl ywood no shut
@Holl ywood bot
Thank you, Zote The Mighty
I am genuinly concerned for humanity's inteligence after finding out about NFTs.
It is literally the absolute stupidest fucking concept any living being in any part of the world (including Britain) has come up with.
"I don't know what to use for sound here so I just recorded myself eating"
So...squizzy eats...jars and bottles?
yes
You don't?
@Holl ywood silence bot
@Holl ywood this is the worst bot ive ever seen
@@roachdoggjr419 seen worse, this one's the biggest beggar I've seen tho
the etherium bitcoin network consumes about as much power annually as 23 coal-fired power plants output, so you might need to spend more than 40 years if you're riding solo
(that's 80 terrawatt-hours, reported back in June before NFTs became this big)
(that's roughly the amount that the nation of Finland uses each year)
Yeah, sure, lol
@@sptflcrw8583 thank you for confirming what he said.
@@Tweedle-Stupid because it’s bullshit
also nobody seems to be talking about the 37 kilotons of e-waste generated per year by bitcoin (ASICs only used for mining). It's at 2 iphones worth of e-waste PER TRANSACTION
Fun fact: Buying magical snake oil is better than buying NFTs
what has happened recently that everyone's all up on NFTs shit again? the amount of garbage that people still believe in this shit is ridiculous.
@@snowballeffect7812 because of that one conv screenshot when an nft bro got all pissy about a screen shot.
And also because of the "This pic goes so hard. Feel free to screenshot" meme.
And it costs a lot less
Buying literal snakes is better
This nft goes hard, feel free to screenshot
@Holl ywood no
@@deviImycry I've watched and it's kinda good
@@bilbloblep6769 no thanks im good 💪
Bloody hell, this makes my friend's commission art for 4$ look like Mona Lisa
The way people talk about how it's actually good to completely artificially restrict access to art is disgusting.
You have access to the art still, it never gets taken down as something you can view trade for even after its bought, you just don't get any of the perks that come with owning a stake in an NFT art project
@@graphikally And what are those 'perks'? Sure, currently it's basically nothing aside from bragging rights, but some assholes are already trying to implement the removal of ability to simply copy/paste NFTed images and similar stuff. I.e. they are trying to artificially take away access to art.
That's not even touching upon the environmental stuff.
@@graphikally The only perk is that you might be able to sell it to an even bigger sucker.
That's not what NFT's are though.
@@phxcppdvlazi Right now they aren't, thankfully. However, some people are very much trying to make them be of this significance. Until then they will just be a massive waste of resources in exchange for useless metadata.
I've recently developed a hobby of screenshoting every NFT I come across and my gallery is mainly ugly monkeys
The fact that some people would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on bland, shitty art like that is baffling.
if you're being serious, you're being trolled, it doesn't make anyone mad NFT owners are just performing anger in order to make you do something stupid and repetitive that displays an absolute unawareness of how something new to you even works. Stop wasting your time lol
@@graphikally Lol you sound pretty mad 🤭
@@graphikally ok? I’m still calling you a furry and making fun of you for buying ugly picrew monkeys 🤨. If y’all weren’t mad y’all wouldn’t be saying anything lmao
Did an nft owner demand you delete the screenshot
Frankly you deserve your cartoons to be turned into nfts
Once when I was a kid, I tried selling little rocks and crystals I found on the ground for $30. Still a better deal than NFTs.
I mean, at least they look nice and they actually own something.
I'd rather waste my money on a few pebbles than a url
AT least you can kill somebody if you throw a rock with enough force
Glad his mom is still doing ok after 40 years
NFT people be like: "yall wanna see my pog collection?"
the best thing is when they post it on twitter, you just say "I want this on a t-shirt" and the tshirt bots rip the image, making the NFT holder mad. It's beautiful
whats funny is if they just went to t spring it wouldnt even happen to them
Please put my NFT on a tshirt it's free advertising we're all laughing at you.
Nfts just remind me of that one scene in diary of a wimpy kid where greg pays a dinner with a drawing he made
“I think this should cover it”
i remember that, but i literally cannot find it. Neither online nor in the books i have on my shelves
@Dizzy 💀
LMAO SAME
Isn't buying NFTs just money laundering at this point.
People who are into NFTs are literally just trying to make money because they missed the boat on cryptocurrencies
It's gambling all the way down.
NFT is basically crypto, only with a picture attached to make it easier for dumdums to conceptualize it's "value" by making it look like a more traditional investing. So if someone looked at bitcoin and sai "why spend money on internet coin, it have no value" and didn't get suckered in, now they can look at NFT and go "picture cost 40$, me buy picture and sell it for 100$ later".
@@MrFuckingKololo basically crypto? Bruh these weird nft guys gotta stfu 💀. Lets eat them alive Nomad
iTs aN inVeSTMent lmao lol
They haven't really even missed the boat on crypto, tbh. They didn't get in on the ground level where the crazy money is, but there's still time.
Here's what you pay for when you buy an NTF:
proof that you paid money to have an encoded link to the image stored on the blockchain with your name next to it.
That's it. That's what you're paying for. Not the image, not the rights to the image, just to have a _link_ to the image stored on the blockchain with your name next to it. Why anyone would spend money on this is beyond me.
Because there is this very popular thing called "investing", its basically buying something for one price and selling for a higher price and therefore gaining profit of sorts, since you end up with more money than you started. You should look it up, its a genius way of making money.
@@fisk33a I get the bitcoin shit and I still don't like it but nfts, sound really dangerous as a source of investment. It's essentially playing hot potato with it trying to drive up the price of it and praying someone will buy it.
@@fisk33a You sound like the kind of person who would easily fall for Pyramid schemes.
@@fisk33a You love to assume that people opposed to nfts don't understand finance at all huh?
It doesn't matter about the "potential value and profits" you could get out of it. It's still a fucking stupid idea , like who even made this and how did they convince people it's actually worth 100k dollars. LITERAL MASTERPIECES are made less than this sh!t, as an artist myself these horrible monkey of the image itself is about 8-10 dollars at most, but hey lets stick a price on it saying its 100k. wow
Reject NFTs, return to funni monke's.
The NFT art style awfully looks like the gorillaz' one and that's such an insult to the Gorillaz themselves
Damon isn't doing himself any favors by hocking official Gorillaz NFTs, either.
LMAO
@@John_Bud Uh.... You know the NFT don't do their jobs right? They just steal images or trick artist to draw for them.
@@judgebearist WAIT IS HE REALLY
@@judgebearist god am i dissapointed
the genuine anger at the end shook me
People who buy NFT's instead of just printing it are the same people who buy winrar license instead of just closing the message and use winrar for free
i cant believe what im reading… people pay to use winrar???
No, no, they're not. People who pay for winrar are doing it out of generosity, they know they don't need to pay but still do so and through them WinRAR can continue to be Free in the first place, they're like the people that donate to wikipedia. People who buy NFTs aren't nearly as good
Not really, people who pay for winrar are good people, people who buy nft's are just idiots
If you buy the winrar license, you actually support the developers of winrar. If you buy an NFT after the initial auction, the original artist (or "artist") will get nothing.
@@noergelstein Basically nothing*
Which is basically leftovers near zero
I don't understand why people buy NFTs like the only charm I find is that they are really expensive but isn't buying something only because is expensive kind of getting scammed?
I guess it’s the mentality of rich people buying super expensive stuff just because they can and prove they have the money for it.
Many business models thrive by offering a mediocre service, or easily accessible good, simply by producing propaganda that suggests that you would be an elite of society if you were to participate in this good or service. By deluding an audience to conflate your product with status, you remove the need to provide a good service, just one that's good enough. For some examples of this, look for Diamond market inflation, Lobster price inflation, or pretty much any of Apple's current business practices.
It doesn't matter what you sell, if you can trick people into associating it with self-importance.
I hate everything.
It's essentially the promise of being able to re-sell this "receipt" (NFT) for even more money. Either that or, like others mentioned, the aspect of rich people spending money because they're rich and want to buy overblown bullshit. It's like buying a Supreme brick.
@@djfebrezee false, you'll actually own the brick, unlike an nft
@@weebadoo9163 You're right haha
"STOP BUYING THIS FUCKING UGLY SHIT" best speech I ever hear xD
nft andy’s actually baffle me
This is the crypto future were gonna get
I'm pretty sure it's just NFTs that baffle most people. People just see garbage art selling for thousands of dollars and are too lazy to look up how any of it works. NFTs are just proof of providence; a permanent certificate of authenticity that cant' be destroyed or lost. the only slightly true thing that people say about NFTs is the environmental cost, but even that's wrong because whether the NFT existed or not, miners were going to continue to mine at the same rate.
Nobody’s buying. This is just a new way to launder money.
Also the Ape NFT’s all look atrocious
how are you laundering money on a public immutable ledger where every token is tracked and the purpose of the token itself is to prove providence? lol
At least the misinformation about the environmental impact and the right click strawman kind of makes sense, but this argument is literally the opposite of what is actually happening. It's just tax evasion via art, something that's been happening for hundreds of years.
The ape NFTs do look like garbage, which is why it's a good clickbait
@@snowballeffect7812 blockchain consuming absurd energy isn't misinfo, fight me, and the token "proving providence" doesn't mean jack shit legally. As for how you money launder through sales of literally anything, you just take something worthless, find a gimmick to make it look like it could be worth more to any auditors looking in, and then "buy the investment/art/whatever" as a form of payment for an illicit product, the exchange of which can be entirely behind closed doors. This is simple stuff my man.
@@curvingfyre6810 it is misinfo, ur right about everything else tho
@@sptflcrw8583 explain how, please, someone, back up their claims
Some of what's going on is money laundering, some of it is idiot investors who don't understand it's money laundering and think an NFT is actually worth something, and some of it is smart investors taking advantage of the idiots.
Don’t forget Squizzy’s relationship with HER mom
Was this the society Joker warned us about?
That depends on which incarnation of Joker you're referring to.
Yes. Undoubtedly yes.
people going around screenshotting pictures and videos because they don't understand what proof of providence is? probably. it's pretty close to the definition of insanity.
To screw over buyers even more, just remember the magic words kids,
"I want this on a tshirt!"
"Mom?"
"Yes honey?"
"Why do rich people have such shit taste?"
"Well honey, it's because of a thing called N-"
Pay 50000 dollars to access the entire 10 second video
yo this pic goes hard, im gonna screenshot
do
@@yoshizakikokoa Don't mind if i doooo~
Is no one gonna talk about the *hilarious gorgeous* sounds of squizzy's eating?
Or the gorgeous sounds of her abusing her partner‼️
Ikr? She must have been inspired to use that audio from also being abusive to her ex Bf
Do most nft collectors actually make money reselling? The value of an nft is purely in the demand for one, and most of them don't seem to really have any value, like why would I buy a shitty randomly generated anthro lion when I could commission a furry artist to make me a quality custom anthro lion.
It's called money laundering and pyramid schemes respectively. You just convince a bunch of people it's worth shit, they buy it, once the idiots have been milked dry you run off with the money.
@@RAHelllord aka the tried and true "pump and dump" strategy
@@RAHelllord As an eco major, money has no intrinsic form or value. Technically anything can be money. And NFTs have nothing to do with pyramid schemes you buzzword-shouting raidboss crackhead.
@@crabbington7736 "as an eco major"
You are most definitely not an eco major if you spend time calling people "buzzword-shouting raidboss crackhead" over calling furry art pyramid schemes
@@crabbington7736 hey I just took a nice fresh steamy shit. Wanna pay 10000 dollars for it?
If you think the screenshot feature is hilarious, wait until you tell them that Twitter saves the image on their servers whenever you post it on their site.
Twitter officially owns all their NFTs.
I wonder if someone posted this bit of info on Twitter for all of the Twitter users to see.
NFTs have extreme 90s Beanie Baby energy. Except if everyone could just get a free copy of your Beanie Baby after you buy it if they want.
After beanie babies fell out of style they were dirt cheap and my parents bought dozens of them for me and my sibling when we were little.
They be like "this the only one in the world are you jealous?" Until I hit em with that screenshot button.
I saw NFT collectibles at a target near a mall.
*I wish we all died in 2012.*
Hey, mind if I screen record this nft video?
This hits hard af.
let me screenshot every single frame real quick.
@@ToynimalandParktureReview fxcking legend
no you may not screenshot, see you in court haha
@@supertired6412 Food court for him being such a nice person
@Holl ywood reported for spam
None of the NFT art is anywhere near as good as the art I can commission my friends to do for $30 or less.
Or I can just look at everyone else's art for free because they don't hide it from everyone lmao
This is why artists have shit pay. Who the fuck does commission for 30!
Why do these nfts look like something I'll make in a character creator by clicking the "randomize" button.
i wasnt into nft until i seen that beautiful
collage of monkeys at the end
In my opinion, NFTs are the economic equivalent of fidget spinners…
they're actually the economic equivalent of physical paintings that the rich use to evade taxes. but maybe they also bought fidget spinners as art pieces to avoid taxes, too; idk.
@@snowballeffect7812 truuuuuuue
At least with fidget spinners I can physically hold it and play with it. This is just straight up garbage.
Do you understand the mathematics behind NFTs? No? Then shut up, you like everyone else in these comments has literal actual clue as to what they are talking about.
atleast fidget spinner are physical, i can play and interact with them
they have cool variation
i can own them
“Idk what to use for sound so I just recorded myself eating”
*Inserts audio of Godzilla gobbling up an orphanage like macaroni*
"An NFT might just be a few pixels on a screen, just like a painting is paint on a canvas, but the original has a certain, unique "identifier" that shows that it is the original, and based on that, it can only have ONE owner at a time. That's what makes NFT's valuable." - Pikachu
Im screenshotting it
Man i thought Charizard said that quote
And all that just for the price of our environment!
doesn't explain why anyone would actually want to """"own"""" a randomly generated picture of a monkey that makes me want to light my eyes on fire
🛌
Randomly generated nfts getting more worth than an actual commission makes me want to go commit sudoku
Another day of humanity marching closer to annihilation, another day of me farming potatoes in an underground Bunker waiting for the EMP, another day of smiling watching Squizzys content and be proud to have been here at one point.
Also do you guys think a 400x400 jpg of my potato collection would be a good NFT when the world's food supply runs out in like, 3254?
you'd legit have a case of genuine rarity, rendering it increased vlaue under real market forces, unlike any NFT that's been made in todays market, plus by then the damage to the climate will have eitehr been done, or been at least marginally averted, so ye
@@curvingfyre6810 *alright fuckboys call me technoblade cause I'm boutta quit my job to farm potatoes.*
Who sits down one day and goes
“Oh yeah I’m gonna own a picture on the internet”
Like what?
What a cool animator! Hopefully they didnt say the n word or abused anyone and suicide baited them! Cant wait to see whats next!
From sayn' the n world to abusing someone Is a plank of time
oh my god we get it stop saying this on every video man
@@fidbro237 what do you mean? i'm simply spreading the word of this great animator
I hope they do! 😍
@@lugxxxzzz1014 you’re spreading engagement and giving squiz money..
Nft? Oh you mean
No
Feelings of empathy
Towards Others
I’ve spent decades in the ETH mines to buy this fine money
if you spent decades mining ETH, you'd be at least a multi millionaire lol. I don't think Eth's even been around more than 15 years.
They really would pay thousands for some shitty picrew monkeys instead of getting an art commission with much higher quality for a fraction of the price.
that art commission wouldn't act as an entry ticket into private yacht clubs, but that owning that shitty piccrew monkey does lol
@@graphikally they still think its about the jpeg lol
@@jfkonlsd1364 they're so fucking dumb it's sad
“NOOOO! You can just screenshot the art I spent all of my money on. It defeats the point of my purchase.”
"Hahaha mouse go Copy-and-save as"
2020: Return to monke
2021: Wait no not like that
Both LIMC and Squizzy released anti NFT content in one day 😈 it’s all coming together
Can’t wait to see the market crash
lol do you think two random youtube videos perpetuating misinformation about NFTs is going to affect the NFT market? Like all these NFT kids are gonna suddenly be like "OH, the NFT is the art itself and not just proof of providence on a public immutable ledger? Guess I should dump my asset and walk away with the profits!"
@@snowballeffect7812
@@shiba_kiba it's clearly not a joke when people literally as spreading lies. It's the same thing as having an anti-vaxxer mentality. If you're going to criticize something, at least criticize it factually.
NFT artist: "You can't defeat me"
My wallet: "I know, but he can"
Screenshot
Ah yes, I *WOULD* like to buy your 6,000$ NFT of a poorly drawn monkey. Thank you.
200k+
I like how almost everyone realized we can just screenhot or right-click save the NFT
No offense but I would say 99% or more of the people who ever actually buy NFTs, are fully aware of this fact. Its just an ego thing. And also money laundering lol.
imagine a point when the memes cost money
My main problem with NFT’s aren’t that they don’t make sense, it’s that they are super bad for the environment.
They're not, though. Whether NFTs existed or not, the miners were gonna mine. There's no difference in cost whether the NFT is created or not. If you think there is, then by that logic, all we'd have to do is make trillions of NFTs and the environmental cost of each individual NFT would approach zero.
@@snowballeffect7812 Mucho texto 🤑
They are bad for artists too. These scammers take their images and try to sell them as NFTs.
@@crepooscul they're bad for the artists' reputation, since NFTs are perceived as bad, but unless the artist wanted to sell on the NFT market, too, they're not being hurt financially.
@@snowballeffect7812 yes but what if the artist WANTED to get in to NFTs but someone already stole their art and made NFTs of it? intellectual property law is meant to protect the right of the artist to expand into new markets using their existing IP. the issue is that because of the stolen art issue of NFTs artists are having this right taken from them.
Edit: I also want to say a lot of the NFT buying public doesn't understand NFT's. there is a lot of misinformation about them like how you own or don't own the image, or the environmental impact stuff. Ive seen legit NFT owners think they are buying actual art but they are only buying basically a URL.
just so yall know, its worse than you realize.
theyre not so much paying for the image, but paying for the Receipt. that says they bought that instance of the image as it is on the internet, at time of purchase.
for the love of god i hope all these people involved lose their money
they also say that they are "right click victims" when they post their stuff on twitter and people right click it and repost it
to be fair that monkey has laser eyes
i'd pay 5,000 dollars that's a cool monkey
Monke nfts are the only ones worth buying
It’s like a picrew for people who have no idea what to do with their money
Worse, because it's not even customizable
When NFT artists discovered commissions:
Also if i wanted to buy a "piece of art" I could commission a artist and use that for a pfp. Uses way less power, not part of a stupid block chain and it's not stealing any money from them. Seems like a win win since i own it and the original artist gets paid as well. With the original style still being owned to them
Spending 40 years in a cave totally sounds awesome.
Its enough time to watch nft markets crash and burn
If you ever feel bad just remember the guy that spent more than 500k dollars in a bunch of monkey sprites
Idea: have every youtuber launch NFT collection to flood the market and break the system
This NFT goes hard. Feel free to screenshot
the NFT is on the blockchain and just says "joe butt owns this picture". screenshotting art shouldn't bother NFT holders unless the screenshotter then goes on to profit off the art or claims it as their own.
Gonna commit the biggest "art" heist with only screenshots
you should also save ALOT of them, then post on a website of your preference with caption: "these pics go so hard, feel free to screenshot... like, all of them. dont care anymore" and watch the world go into *chaos.*
@@BobbinRobbin777 fuck it im gonna make an Instagram account called art theif and just spam nfts
@@whofuckingcares7490 godspeed king.
@@whofuckingcares7490 link me your instagram account. NFT owners are just trolling normies into thinking it makes them mad.
saddest part is that you don't even own the image, which makes me feel better about myself when thinking about those who waste money on NFTs
Tech bros want NFTs to be the next Pokemon cards. But really they are the next furbies
This animation is absolutely lovely, where can i buy the NFT for this?
The fact I got an ad about NFTs while watching this...
Such a relief to see another based artist pushing back against this. Thanks!
@@beckforgrave7646 it's good
A true chad would just buy commissions
So wait, is getting a commission art done considered NFT? Heck yeah I should totally sell my furry characters for $20,000 so I can pay for houses, my car, pay my wife to come back, life will be good
No?!? Have any of you people actually researched what an NFT is? What the fuck is with all these people talking out their ass about NFT's.