I personally think things have been going downhill some time ago, but I assume people are just trying to pin to that single event in order to explain stuff like this
NFT art isn't about the art. No reseller cares in the slightest how their NFT art looks. It's just another object of speculation. Bitcoin is literally a line of code. Yet people make tons of money with it.
@@marioo849but with nft you could pay 2000USD hoping for a profit but if the best they offer you is 2 dollars then that's it. It's literally how art works. But I would rather pay for a real mona lisa with required way more skill and talent than from an exploited bored monkey that the only difference from other boredapes are their colors or clothes.
It's more than lazy and terrible, it's almost viscerally offensive. It assaults the senses. It drips of privilege and entitlement. Art shouldn't evoke such a deep welling of hatred for it's creator.
my favorite part is how they take absolutely no criticism whatsoever. they disabled likes/dislikes on both the trailer and episode 1 after both were ratio'd super hard, and while episode 1 still has comments (but i think they might be deleting them), they disabled comments on the trailer
I honestly think this show is just a joke. I mean they didn't have anything they wanted to say, any story to tell or even at least trying to be funny, but they treat it like art, it just feels bizarre
The draw of NFT's is either trying to make money in a speculative market, trying to scam people, showing off your personal wealth or trying desperately to be in a rich people club of some sort. Not one of those draws is anything even remotely commendable. NFT's only hurt the art world, the environment, and smaller artists.
Fun fact: the model of each character is just the actual screenshot of the NFT itself. That's why there's a weird white outline on the ape's body. Truly a masterpiece
People managed to make a masterpiece of a movie with legos and they can't do something decent with these NFTs? Even with all the money they got? This just shows you that this is a scam from a to z. The show sucks, the NFTs themselves and ugly, it's faaaaaaaaar too expensive and even then, it's just stupid, you can literally screenshot them like why are you buying them????
yeah because big mouth had wonderful voice actors, realistic moments, an actual coherent storyline, three-dimensional characters going through awkward and difficult times, etc... and touches on many social issues and experiences of growing teenagers this.... this is just fucking ugly and incoherent. this sounds like a bunch of middle schoolers were forced to write a script for school, and a bunch of adults were told to voice act it out in the most awkward way possible. at least big mouth had a reason for a hideous artstyle (to prevent the sexualization of minors), but this is.. just vile, an excuse for money laundering and making a shitty cartoon to "own the libs". im pretty sure the awful netflix originals like that ugly police force show or that one about the queen have better content
No, High Guardian Spice is even better, that project maybe had incompetent people but they tried their best and had passion (except for certain writers whom I won't call by name). This The Ugly Ape Family project has no passion behind it.
This just solidified my hate for how these monkeys' mouths are designed. I can't explain why but I just found their mouths to be so unnatural even on the still image versions. Now it's animated and it's become more horrifying.
I have no idea why either, but the BAYC NFTs fill me with a visceral rage. I can't tell if I just strongly dislike the art or what it represents, or both.
All the artists are laughing at this NFT thing. They could just right-click and save it; then open an art program and just draw their own and sell it. Because technically it's 100% original since they drew this new look and it's not really a copy of someone elses if it's edited. But people wouldn't do that.... would they?
I could also buy so much art from art commissions, get full creative liberty over it, at much higher quality. NFTs are such a stupid concept when art commissions and all that have existed for so long
On twitter someone who worked on the show was replying to people making fun of the show to screenshot the cartoon and animate something better and one person asked why they would use a screenshot to animate something and the person who worked on the show replied "thats what we did"
Correction (I think) : Someone on twitter who worked on the NFT show were replying to people making fun of the show. Their response to these replies was something along the lines of “Screenshot a monkey nft and animate something better then.” When the people trashing the show read this, they were confused and said “Why would we need to screenshot the monkey NFT to animate it, let alone better then you?” The worker then said “Because that’s what we did,” implying that they screenshotted the monkey NFT and basically traced it over for every monkey character to animate the show.
That isn't even how NFTs work -- it's recorded inside the *blockchain.* You can't put that on a USB. The only thing you can put on a USB pertaining to an NFT is, ironically, a copy of the pixels themselves I.E a fucking *screenshot.*
Rewatched it after someone mentioned the white borders, I also noticed that sometimes the outline wasn't there at all. In that they cut into the characters border, and made it look like a 5 year old was just learning how to use scissors XD.
@@nicholasmorgan7609 I mean to me it was pretty obvious at first cuz the sound that was in scene conveyed that and since the animation is so bad i just figured thats what they were going for
2:24 Let me tell you exactly what's happening in that scene. The entire area is supposed to be shaking, because their spaceship just landed nearby and they've got to board it soon. But somewhere in the pipeline of the animation process, the animators either didn't know or they forgot that everything else should be shaking as well.
Yeah man. This Red Family album is a complete down grade from the previous ones. Man Gorillaz sure have fallen.. I'm not happy and I'm not feeling glad.
I’ve spent 84 hours screen shorting every single frame of this show. It goes so hard and I felt free. Edit: wow how tf did people actually believe I did that. I’ve never seen the show in my life prior to this video.
Someone in scriptwriting failed creative writing so bad, that they relied on Family Guy as a way to write the show's gags... but still didn't know what to do with the story Animation and voice acting. Yeah I'd expect the characters to be just as full of life and expressive as the Cryptobros
so lemme get this straight... this show costs like millions of dollars... but it is lower quality then the free animations that were made on newgrounds 10 years ago
the show costs millions of dollars because all of the characters in the show are screenshots of NFT's themselves. but its not a million dollars as in actual budget spent.
I insist that the Bored Ape artsyle looks like a character generator website that would’ve been popular around 2014 if you quit the thing that they are “worth millions of dollars” bullcrap.
And it is disturbingly similar to the lion ones too. There is definitely a couple of companies who have jumped in on this at just the right time to hype this shit and make out like bandits.
@@poofsplix2003 Nothing to say they can't be selling you the NFT AND a hotwheels car. Could just be another way to confuse and obfuscate the issue and potentially avoid legal issue.
Ok I might get attacked for this, but the Bored Ape art is ok at best, HOWEVER, I'll be damned to hell if I'm about pull out a $1,000 or whatever in digital currency for a singular, "unique" image. If I was going to go to lengths of paying a whole bunch of money for art, might as well go commission someone from Discord, Twitter, etc. Lots of good artists who charge for WAYYY less than... this mess. Also nice Kirb music btw!
Honestly I'd happily put $1000 towards an independent artist who needs to pay bills vs some already rich person who needs to use a base for the shit they're selling lmfao. Hell, even physical items like plushies usually only cost around $200 depending on the artist. I could get 5 whole plushies of my own design with that! Fursuits are a different story, though.... it's insane... those things are worth like 4k - 10k each... but tbh for all the work/money that goes into making one its pretty reasonable
We all know that the monke designs are damn ugly but oh my god the animation is just so... bad...... Animation is hella clunky. There're so many animation errors (weird clipping in body parts, rushed lineart on characters joints, lineart missing on characters joints etc) it hurts to look at. The mouth animation is literally powerpoint slides. The arm and leg animation is just them rotating it like a puppet. At least it's kinda poetic. It's expensive yet trash and lazily made, just like NFTs themself.
@@RosieAnims I mean idk, I guess they're not so confident in themselves if they're rushing this. I believe their Twitter account tried bragging that South Park would change their Post Covid ep because RAF was being released on the same day. I dont know, it's just dumb.
Oh my god I finally know what they're doing at the part where Zeep thought they were laughing, according to the sound, I think they were having trouble standing up as the building was shaking when their ride arrived, I HAVE UNLOCKED FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE!
Look, I get it's supposed to be the future and things are absurd, but the fact they can potray a NFT, essentially what amounts to a single piece of stock or a crappy cartoon being worth more than a city as well as a cultral landmark and not think that's dystopic as shit is baffling
What's absolute insane to me is that, they don't own the intellectual property, the artist could turn around and sell the thing again, and the buyer can't do anything
Fr. The people aren’t actually buying the image. They just own one specific link to it. It’s literally some kind of intangible asset that only exists through the proof of purchase
I think that's the point? that the artist retains ownership of the image, and you're paying, essentially, for the ability to view it and post it online.
@@rdogg114 An example being Innovation for the sake of innovation. We don't need to innovate the shape of wheels or the shape of doors anymore. Most of the time we are lucky enough that stupid ideas quickly die but there are a lot of companies making a lot of money putting minimal effort into pumping out lion pictures and monkey pictures and hyping the shit out of it that it won't die easily.
I'd rather just listen to a sound effect of a fart for 8 minutes straight. A literal white screen is a revolutionary artistic masterpiece comparing to this
I would like to clarify the point you made at the start; Buying an NFT doesn't mean you own the image, it means you own a piece of a blockchain that functions as a receipt for the image. It's like attempting to buy a movie prop and instead just getting the certificate of authenticity
and then people screenshot these things thinking it means something. do they also think the same thing about the mona lisa? if someone takes a photo that its worth money or it decreases the value of the painting?
@@hugh.g.rection5906 it means that you don't own the fucking thing. You own a receipt of it. But anyone else can take it. You can't compare it to the Mona Lisa you moron, it's not like everyone has a perfect physical copy of it. But screenshotting the nft does give you that. The art is just an excuse to sell certificates for money laundering.
@@hugh.g.rection5906 Nobody who takes a photo of the mona lisa is under the impression that they have anything even remotely equivalent to the original. But this isn't the same. We are talking about downloading a bit perfect digital copy of a digital asset. The equivalent with the mona lisa would be pressing a button and instantly getting an carbon copy, atom by atom replica of the mona lisa physically popping into existence in front of you that you can then carry around with you and is completely indistinguishable from the original in every single way. They are just not comparable no matter how many time it is used. An NFT isn't linked to copyright in any way. Right now, I could take a photo that I don't own the copyright of, like a picture of mickey mouse or homer simpson, both of which are completely owned by someone else. But even though I don't own the copyright, I can make an NFT from the image, because an NFT is simple a glorified hash that gets spat out from the algorithm when you feed in the raw data of the file. And then I can sell that NFT. But I am selling the NFT, the token, the series of bytes. Not the image which I do not own, nor the copyrights which I do not own. It would be like someone buying a movie ticket and thinking that not only do they own the physical copy of the movie being played in the cinema, but the copyright of the movie too. You do not. There is absolutely no link between NFT's and ownership of the underlying data.
Развлечения
the consequence of that one gorilla dying in that one zoo in 2016
I personally think things have been going downhill some time ago, but I assume people are just trying to pin to that single event in order to explain stuff like this
@@jalisco-kallisto6216 idk about that but its funny when you say that one meme in 2016 caused all the issues we have now
The chad Harmbe vs the virgin NFT Monkey's.
We must send a Terminator to save that Gorilla
Those NFTs are worse than Donkey Kong's family (I'm not sure if they're even a family)
I don’t want to believe that all of this is real.
Lain pfp?
You are so cultured
@@Custarddolphin Thanks thanks.
the worst reality
It’s unreleased content
It looks hideous it's worth not even a penny and it hurts the environment just watch Rocket Monkies instead you're get more enjoyment
The general idea of this show is to make money, not draw something to appreciate. True NFT mentality
NFT art isn't about the art. No reseller cares in the slightest how their NFT art looks. It's just another object of speculation. Bitcoin is literally a line of code. Yet people make tons of money with it.
@@marioo849 it's about telling others that you're rich and using the NFT to prove it.
@@marioo849but with nft you could pay 2000USD hoping for a profit but if the best they offer you is 2 dollars then that's it. It's literally how art works. But I would rather pay for a real mona lisa with required way more skill and talent than from an exploited bored monkey that the only difference from other boredapes are their colors or clothes.
It portrays NFTs perfectly
Chaotic uncanny mess that makes no sense
Would screenshot
I wouldn't screenshot, not worth my phone memory.
@@friendlyneighborhoodkelbea7258 fr
Nfts aremt worth my device memory because it's like cancer but removable
It's more than lazy and terrible, it's almost viscerally offensive. It assaults the senses. It drips of privilege and entitlement.
Art shouldn't evoke such a deep welling of hatred for it's creator.
Man you over here rivaling earl sweatshirt with that poetic speech
somebody here is afraid of red, blue, and yellow
somebody here is me and I fucking hate those colours
@@plasticballs So you also hate the flags of Andorra, Armenia, Colombia, Ecuador, Chad, Moldova, and Romania? Interesting.
@@theseeker3073 romania is not real
you have been fed anarchist lies
@@plasticballs Oh? So where am I living?
my favorite part is how they take absolutely no criticism whatsoever. they disabled likes/dislikes on both the trailer and episode 1 after both were ratio'd super hard, and while episode 1 still has comments (but i think they might be deleting them), they disabled comments on the trailer
I had no idea about this aspect of them lmao. That makes them even worse.
I honestly think this show is just a joke. I mean they didn't have anything they wanted to say, any story to tell or even at least trying to be funny, but they treat it like art, it just feels bizarre
and they privated every negative comment on episode 1
@@pietrobruno5734 really? I checked yesterday and I could still see them
@@majora6767 but for me i checked it today and i didnt see them
The draw of NFT's is either trying to make money in a speculative market, trying to scam people, showing off your personal wealth or trying desperately to be in a rich people club of some sort. Not one of those draws is anything even remotely commendable. NFT's only hurt the art world, the environment, and smaller artists.
I thought it was just a web toon, made by some weird redditors but someone apparently paid money to get this produced, I can't believe it.
Fun fact: the model of each character is just the actual screenshot of the NFT itself. That's why there's a weird white outline on the ape's body. Truly a masterpiece
NO WAY LMAO
Holy shit. That's hilarious 😂
The irony
*It's too much!*
ironic NFT sellers hate screenshots of their NFTS yet they also screenshot NFTS
no one is innocent anymore
I noticed this whilst watching it with friends and god it’s annoying. They didn’t even cut out the image properly so that’s just there and I hate it.
This isn’t your ordinary capitalism. This is, Super Capitalism.
Lmao
Thank you Vriska
Advanced Capitalism :o
@@arenwalesa definitely not advanced, it's going backwards rather
@@god0fmeth Reverse capitalism
People managed to make a masterpiece of a movie with legos and they can't do something decent with these NFTs? Even with all the money they got? This just shows you that this is a scam from a to z. The show sucks, the NFTs themselves and ugly, it's faaaaaaaaar too expensive and even then, it's just stupid, you can literally screenshot them like why are you buying them????
I love the ad for The Sandbox before the vid, what an amazing start
This Goes so hard, fell free to Record
NO NO NO
@@zeepsterd 📸->💻->📩
power button + volume down button = screenshot
*screen records it in 144p*
@@B0rgerX_ the only quality it's worth watching it in-
actually no, it ain't even worth it in the end to actually watch this diabolical piece of trash
After seeing this Red Ape NFT's, I think Big Mouth wasn't really a bad cartoon at all...
OUCH.
yeah because big mouth had wonderful voice actors, realistic moments, an actual coherent storyline, three-dimensional characters going through awkward and difficult times, etc... and touches on many social issues and experiences of growing teenagers
this.... this is just fucking ugly and incoherent. this sounds like a bunch of middle schoolers were forced to write a script for school, and a bunch of adults were told to voice act it out in the most awkward way possible. at least big mouth had a reason for a hideous artstyle (to prevent the sexualization of minors), but this is.. just vile, an excuse for money laundering and making a shitty cartoon to "own the libs". im pretty sure the awful netflix originals like that ugly police force show or that one about the queen have better content
honestly i think this is uglier than big mouth and that's saying something
this makes paradise PD look like season 5 simpsons
No, High Guardian Spice is even better, that project maybe had incompetent people but they tried their best and had passion (except for certain writers whom I won't call by name). This The Ugly Ape Family project has no passion behind it.
This just solidified my hate for how these monkeys' mouths are designed. I can't explain why but I just found their mouths to be so unnatural even on the still image versions. Now it's animated and it's become more horrifying.
I have no idea why either, but the BAYC NFTs fill me with a visceral rage. I can't tell if I just strongly dislike the art or what it represents, or both.
Funny how a single youtube animator can make better quality art than people with humoungous amounts of money.
People who own NFTs probably smell like the worst Axe deodorant.
They smell like sweaty expired rotten parmesan
@@Vexxel256 it is smell of hell
They don't use deodorant
i own a screenshotted nft
Nice pfp 😳
The general idea of an nft is to put no effort into making it so they were faithful to the concept
He's not wrong
Glad they something right
the animation makes the varying facial expresions in transformers energon that range from dull surprise to dull surprise look like a godsend
NFT's are like when every player in smash chooses the same character and the colour changes
All the artists are laughing at this NFT thing.
They could just right-click and save it; then open an art program and just draw their own and sell it. Because technically it's 100% original since they drew this new look and it's not really a copy of someone elses if it's edited.
But people wouldn't do that.... would they?
I could also buy so much art from art commissions, get full creative liberty over it, at much higher quality. NFTs are such a stupid concept when art commissions and all that have existed for so long
semi good artist here
yes, i fuckin would
I'm not even an artist, and I'd do that just to spite them. XD
I barely get any commissions, so it made my day when a guy dm'd me for one
Then he said it was for a NFT 💀
just to see their reaction I'd take their bored ape and turn it into a very excited ape.
Oh if NFT's worth SO much, why does it look like shit? It's almost as if they didn't pay the animators or something.
EXACTLY.
They say they are supposed to look like shit because it's "innovative for art". Mediocrity and bs is what this is.
It's not for the art, It's for money laundering
How tf is this art 😂
Its kinda remind me of how bad modern arts industry work, literally A BLANK WHITE CANVAS worth a fking thousand of dollars just wow..
I feel like the second the IRS finds a way to Tax NFTs, this shit is just gonna implode into a black hole.
Gonna implode harder than the soviet union and the HRE and the roman empire put together
"trading these things like pokemon cards"
best nft art
vs
worst pokemon card art
It's not even a battle. Pokémon cards absolutely STOMP NFTs.
On twitter someone who worked on the show was replying to people making fun of the show to screenshot the cartoon and animate something better and one person asked why they would use a screenshot to animate something and the person who worked on the show replied "thats what we did"
Godzilla had a stroke trying to read this and fucking died
This was one sentence
This would make my 3rd grade Language arts teacher die
A fetus could write better then thiss
Correction (I think) : Someone on twitter who worked on the NFT show were replying to people making fun of the show. Their response to these replies was something along the lines of “Screenshot a monkey nft and animate something better then.” When the people trashing the show read this, they were confused and said “Why would we need to screenshot the monkey NFT to animate it, let alone better then you?” The worker then said “Because that’s what we did,” implying that they screenshotted the monkey NFT and basically traced it over for every monkey character to animate the show.
I like how they say "Non Fungible Token"
Yet the 'Most Valuable' is contained in a singular USB stick.
Sounds like it's pretty funged to me.
Non fungible toucan
That isn't even how NFTs work -- it's recorded inside the *blockchain.* You can't put that on a USB. The only thing you can put on a USB pertaining to an NFT is, ironically, a copy of the pixels themselves I.E a fucking *screenshot.*
@@amanofnoreputation2164 So are you telling me that the NFT mother fuckers who made this DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW AN NFT WORKS THEMSELVES!?
@@amanofnoreputation2164 NFTs are simply trash.
End of discussion.
@@DiggerDeeper01 Obviously, else they wouldn’t be spending $20 million on them.
Rewatched it after someone mentioned the white borders, I also noticed that sometimes the outline wasn't there at all. In that they cut into the characters border, and made it look like a 5 year old was just learning how to use scissors XD.
"before i force you to watch episode 2" IT'S NOT A ONE SHOT!?!!? IT'S A SERIES!?!?!!?!?
I'm led to believe this is the beginning of the end for humanity as we know it.
"Beginning of the end for humanity"
Yeah, its been going on for milleniums now
true
It's just George C. Parker's selling bridges scheme in the 21st century
Another day of thanking God for not making me a NFT "artist"
WTF I watch one video about OneShot *NOT EVEN A DAY AGO* and then I find this profile picture in the comment section
They werent laughing, they were shaking because their plane or whatever was starting up but I dont blame anyone who was confused because its awful
Okay but how did you figure that out?
Came here to say this
my assumption as well
@@nicholasmorgan7609 I mean to me it was pretty obvious at first cuz the sound that was in scene conveyed that and since the animation is so bad i just figured thats what they were going for
@@Zwill1208 okay, fair enough
This makes High Guardian Spice look like a masterpiece
3:04
damn bro you got the whole squad laughing
i love how this “show” is just a promo for you to buy even MORE NFT’s
I mean to be fair that's what like 75% shows are for
@@Mall13vm not to this extent at all
Reminds me of those cartoons made for children that has the intention of promoting their toys LOL
@@serpent7553 mate ninjago was good
@@w0omylord764 yeah ninjago had lore, this is just dogshit
2:24 Let me tell you exactly what's happening in that scene. The entire area is supposed to be shaking, because their spaceship just landed nearby and they've got to board it soon. But somewhere in the pipeline of the animation process, the animators either didn't know or they forgot that everything else should be shaking as well.
THANK YOU.
cough cough the crystal to the left lookin kinda sus tho 0_0
Omfg
LMAOOO NO FUCKING WAY
This asks more questions then it answers
this video was less than 5 minutes long but i felt like ive been here an eternity
4:24 NOT THE SQUID GAME REFERENCE 😭😭😭
I may be self-conscious as hell about my own art, but there's no way I can make anything as awful as this. Not even on purpose.
That's because you care about your work!
Your work definitely looks lovely! Don't be so hard on yaself :>
I feel this comment on my core
never seen your art but i'm 100% sure you're not exaggerating at all
So this is that Gorillaz band everyone’s been talking about…
NOOOOOOOO LMAO
It's Monkez
Yeah man. This Red Family album is a complete down grade from the previous ones. Man Gorillaz sure have fallen..
I'm not happy and I'm not feeling glad.
Of course, mohawk monkey is named Murdoc, female red monkey is named Noodle, idiot at the counter is named 2-D, and mini trump guy is named Russ
DON'T DO GORILLAZ LIKE THAT 😭😭
“Hewasupawewa WASSAAAAAAAAA”
-red ape family, 2020
Got an NFT ad before the start of the video 😂
It knows.
I’ve spent 84 hours screen shorting every single frame of this show. It goes so hard and I felt free.
Edit: wow how tf did people actually believe I did that. I’ve never seen the show in my life prior to this video.
Lmao
The pfp makes the comment so much better
This man is a true hero
Why would you want that much crappy art on your device
Make a Google drive
Someone in scriptwriting failed creative writing so bad, that they relied on Family Guy as a way to write the show's gags... but still didn't know what to do with the story
Animation and voice acting. Yeah I'd expect the characters to be just as full of life and expressive as the Cryptobros
Imagine relying on Family Guy as your source of humor.
how imagine future celebrity cameos really are
a bunch of amateurs just practically speaking to the mic and not acting
@@zeepsterd Yeah! That's almost as bad as the time Harambe died. * shows Harambe being shot *
"don't screenshot my NFT😡😡😡" "you will be hearing from my lawyer"
this is one of the shows ever really investedin the charactersjust a masterpiece period.
I'm just surprised that the nft Market hasn't imploded yet
As soon as it gets taxed it’ll burst
Its money laundering
It's not a real market.
@@Doflaminguard Monkey laundering lol
I'm surprised crypto as a whole hasn't imploded
so lemme get this straight...
this show costs like millions of dollars...
but it is lower quality then the free animations that were made on newgrounds 10 years ago
This says a lot about society
It can’t be cost million dollars it can’t lol
the show costs millions of dollars because all of the characters in the show are screenshots of NFT's themselves. but its not a million dollars as in actual budget spent.
@@zeepsterd The Industrial Society and its Future
@@ConfirmedZer0 its*
2:15 I like how that’s not even how NFTs work. They didn’t even bother to learn the thing they’re defending.
I saw the NFT icon on picrew and I was like “weird” I DIDNT KNOW THIS WAS A WHOLE THING-
I insist that the Bored Ape artsyle looks like a character generator website that would’ve been popular around 2014 if you quit the thing that they are “worth millions of dollars” bullcrap.
Id be surprised if you told me it wasnt exactly that
And it is disturbingly similar to the lion ones too. There is definitely a couple of companies who have jumped in on this at just the right time to hype this shit and make out like bandits.
only good NFTS are the hot wheels one since theyll start shipping you the actual car you have in your nft
(DISCLAIMER: DO NOT BUY HOT WHEELS NFTS)
@@TACTIK00L that shit ain't an nft if you actually get something out of it
@@poofsplix2003
Nothing to say they can't be selling you the NFT AND a hotwheels car. Could just be another way to confuse and obfuscate the issue and potentially avoid legal issue.
"you will live to see man-made horrors beyond your comprehension"
"Ah sweet, man made horrors beyond my comprehension." - Peter Family Man
Does this show have subtitles cause I can't understand a word
We were warned about the random chimp event, but we didn't listen...
this hurts
i have no other way to describe it
it just hurts man
What the fuck two Homestuck accounts in one comment section
@@CanceltheEat that's exactly what i thought
@@CanceltheEat LOL
I felt physical pain when the monkey said "NFT"
@@CanceltheEat Andrew Hussie cult is back baby
Ok I might get attacked for this, but the Bored Ape art is ok at best, HOWEVER, I'll be damned to hell if I'm about pull out a $1,000 or whatever in digital currency for a singular, "unique" image. If I was going to go to lengths of paying a whole bunch of money for art, might as well go commission someone from Discord, Twitter, etc. Lots of good artists who charge for WAYYY less than... this mess.
Also nice Kirb music btw!
I'm sorry but I wouldn't pay 1000 for any art
Plus you don’t even own the art, you just get a link to it, you don’t even own copyright to it! Not to mention it destroys the ecosystem
Honestly I'd happily put $1000 towards an independent artist who needs to pay bills vs some already rich person who needs to use a base for the shit they're selling lmfao.
Hell, even physical items like plushies usually only cost around $200 depending on the artist. I could get 5 whole plushies of my own design with that!
Fursuits are a different story, though.... it's insane... those things are worth like 4k - 10k each... but tbh for all the work/money that goes into making one its pretty reasonable
It's not for the art, That's a big misconception. It's for money laundering and carbon footprint awards
If you want your fursona pfp so badly why won't you ask a furry artist to draw it 100 times less then a nft
The voice actors being Australian is the best thing ever
Meanwhile me screenshooting everyone in the cartoon
NFT owners makes Discord mods and redditors look like they're chaotic lawful
And that certainly says something..
this loses a bit of the meaning coming from youtube's comment section
How did you become chaotic and lawful...? Isn't that mean you're neutral...
Has anything come out of Dubai that isn't just garbage made to appeal to rich people? Fuuuuck this is sad.
Garfield eats. That's garbage not made to appeal to anybody
That part where you think they are laughing,it's a breading ritual that these creatures do before breading
This show reminded me that I haven't checked on my Poptropica in years.
We all know that the monke designs are damn ugly but oh my god the animation is just so... bad......
Animation is hella clunky. There're so many animation errors (weird clipping in body parts, rushed lineart on characters joints, lineart missing on characters joints etc) it hurts to look at. The mouth animation is literally powerpoint slides. The arm and leg animation is just them rotating it like a puppet.
At least it's kinda poetic. It's expensive yet trash and lazily made, just like NFTs themself.
>NFT show
Sometimes I wonder how humanity has even been able to live up to 2021.
its 2020 won and this came but next year will be worse next year is 2020 too
Because most of us are normal people. Seriously who asked this besides the one percent circlejerk.
I'm rooting for Covid now to wipe out humanity.
The cartoon looks like something you’d see on tv in gta
That moment when you realize that each frame of the show is an nft that can be right-clicked. Yummy
“You wouldn’t steal a car” yes I would, in fact I have stolen 3
Based.
GTA Players: *Pathetic.*
@@tathnousoxide9707 My dad: Pathetic.
Least based car thief
What I find funny is how these rich NFT owners can't afford better animation.
It's not that they can't afford it, it's just that any competent artist worth their salt would never touch nft's with a 10 foot pole
I think it’s more this was super rushed so they could release it before the NFT craze collapses on itself
@@npc6817 I just hope the artists/animators(assuming they're not invested in NFTs) got paid well.
@@RosieAnims I mean idk, I guess they're not so confident in themselves if they're rushing this. I believe their Twitter account tried bragging that South Park would change their Post Covid ep because RAF was being released on the same day. I dont know, it's just dumb.
@@The_Quencherrr they bought all the nft's they used since u know, screenshot is theft. So yeah I hope they crash and burn
screenshotting every pixel of nft in this video
Oh my god I finally know what they're doing at the part where Zeep thought they were laughing, according to the sound, I think they were having trouble standing up as the building was shaking when their ride arrived, I HAVE UNLOCKED FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE!
"This NFT Show Sucks..."
Every 60 seconds, a minute in africa passes.
Ape 1: Including the Eiffel tower?
Ape 2: Yes, including the Eiffel tower
*Both start vibrating menacingly*
The mouth moviments seems like Aliens trying to imitate human talk
The voice actors sound like they don't wanna wake up their neighbors
Spent all their money buying NFTs, couldn't afford a full animation and writing staff
They've spent way too much that they don't have any money to afford a good animation
I dare someone to screenshot every frame of the show and combine it to make 1 video of the episode
What a coincidence i got an nft ad on this video
that intro of the show is funny lmao
Would it have killed them to animate some emotion in the eyes? They're just so lifeless no matter what every character is trying to express.
“I’m stealing your stupid plastic beach gorilla”
Ah yes I remember the gorillaz nfts… OF PLASTIC BEACH
does anyone know where the outro tune came form?
This makes the CTRL+ALT+DELETE cartoon look like Studio Ghibli.
It would be funny if the screenshot button was the villan and the copy button was his sidecick
that would be too clever and self aware for this "show"
The right click cursor should be the sidekick
the fact that they used cutouts of the NFTS instead of actually animating them just makes it that much worse
im going to take a picture of every godamn frame on this godforsaken nft cartoon
Okay "Nonfuckable Toucan" made me laugh lmao
Look, I get it's supposed to be the future and things are absurd, but the fact they can potray a NFT, essentially what amounts to a single piece of stock or a crappy cartoon being worth more than a city as well as a cultral landmark and not think that's dystopic as shit is baffling
What's absolute insane to me is that, they don't own the intellectual property, the artist could turn around and sell the thing again, and the buyer can't do anything
Fr. The people aren’t actually buying the image. They just own one specific link to it. It’s literally some kind of intangible asset that only exists through the proof of purchase
I think that's the point? that the artist retains ownership of the image, and you're paying, essentially, for the ability to view it and post it online.
@@onelovelylilidiot4959 So it's like a used bus ticket?
I’m gonna screenshot the entire cartoon
“Watch me screenshot every frame of this video”
Ah so this is the “Gorillaz” everyone was talking about
Glad to see a video on this already, found it yesterday
Glad you watched! Have a nice day!
they look like they're yelling but they're practically whispering
bro how did you screenshot this video?
To those who say capitalism breeds innovation, I need them to explain the existence of this vs. everything that was on Newgrounds
maybe communism isn't that bad of an idea
@@jack6478 these are the RED apes tho
Well innovation is not always a good thing.
@@rdogg114
An example being Innovation for the sake of innovation. We don't need to innovate the shape of wheels or the shape of doors anymore. Most of the time we are lucky enough that stupid ideas quickly die but there are a lot of companies making a lot of money putting minimal effort into pumping out lion pictures and monkey pictures and hyping the shit out of it that it won't die easily.
Art has always had braindead rich people buying into overvalued junk. This isn't new, it's just a trending version appropriate for the times lol.
Nutshack is a masterpiece compared to this
I'd rather just listen to a sound effect of a fart for 8 minutes straight. A literal white screen is a revolutionary artistic masterpiece comparing to this
@@majora6767 true shit
Angelina Anaconda is a Tower of Babel.
So its like when companies made cartoons that were actually ads but now they aint even tryna hide it
DAMN they actually referenced the banana and the duct tape from Cat Graffam's NFT video
YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A CAR
YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A HANDBAG
YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A NFT
SCREENSHOTTING IS STEALING
I would actually do all 3, point disproven
*Screenshots*
i screenshotted your wife, she is mine now
Then why do phones have screenshotting features?
Print screen gooo
I would like to clarify the point you made at the start;
Buying an NFT doesn't mean you own the image, it means you own a piece of a blockchain that functions as a receipt for the image.
It's like attempting to buy a movie prop and instead just getting the certificate of authenticity
i'm gonna right-click your nft and you can't do a damn thing about it
and then people screenshot these things thinking it means something. do they also think the same thing about the mona lisa? if someone takes a photo that its worth money or it decreases the value of the painting?
@@hugh.g.rection5906 it means that you don't own the fucking thing. You own a receipt of it. But anyone else can take it. You can't compare it to the Mona Lisa you moron, it's not like everyone has a perfect physical copy of it. But screenshotting the nft does give you that. The art is just an excuse to sell certificates for money laundering.
@@hugh.g.rection5906
Nobody who takes a photo of the mona lisa is under the impression that they have anything even remotely equivalent to the original. But this isn't the same. We are talking about downloading a bit perfect digital copy of a digital asset.
The equivalent with the mona lisa would be pressing a button and instantly getting an carbon copy, atom by atom replica of the mona lisa physically popping into existence in front of you that you can then carry around with you and is completely indistinguishable from the original in every single way. They are just not comparable no matter how many time it is used.
An NFT isn't linked to copyright in any way. Right now, I could take a photo that I don't own the copyright of, like a picture of mickey mouse or homer simpson, both of which are completely owned by someone else. But even though I don't own the copyright, I can make an NFT from the image, because an NFT is simple a glorified hash that gets spat out from the algorithm when you feed in the raw data of the file. And then I can sell that NFT. But I am selling the NFT, the token, the series of bytes. Not the image which I do not own, nor the copyrights which I do not own. It would be like someone buying a movie ticket and thinking that not only do they own the physical copy of the movie being played in the cinema, but the copyright of the movie too. You do not. There is absolutely no link between NFT's and ownership of the underlying data.
@@Subjagator people who screenshot do actually think they have a nft though lol
this
this is the random chimp event we were warned of
I got an ad for a guy selling nfts before this video