If you think any of this will change things think again. Marketing owns this game now, because C.R. only has eyes for SQ42, trying to relive his Wing Commander Heydays.
The hud is awful, it needs to be able to be read, too often you cannot see because the HUD colours are too close the the background. a mechanism to change the hud colours in a user defined way would be more useful.
some AI ships seem able to fly outside their envelope from time to time, it doesnt always happen, but when it does you will come across a reclaimer that can outrun and out turn you...
When they added master(bate) mode my world was shattered. I'm not even kidding, lol. I went through the stages of grief. Just flying around in SC was hands down the best experience in the history of gaming for me and now it's gone forever. (Also a 10-year long backer)
This is just a ply by the developers to save face for all the issues. They dont need any surveys. There is enough comments on any online posters about the game.
I think MM will be good, in the long run, but I wish they had tuned it for the multi-role ships that everyone I know flies regularly instead of fucking most of the ships in favour of the light fighters (and the Hornets).
I noted that my subjective opinion is a throttled opinion based on their effort. And, that less marketing and more development is a much bigger priority.
Def good to do in the meantime, but so much of it will need fully revisiting once engineering and the desire to balance things so that everybody isn’t flying solo - ideally a mixed squad of people would be good. For now all ships riding solo is the meta.
3:45 what exactly does this even mean? is it why my cutter constantly loses its winglets when even just parked and i turn my back on it for 10 seconds?
pour moi c est le gros point noir , pour un jeu de vaisseaux spatials les combats sont horribles et ils ont tendance à oublier que la plupart des joueurs ne sont sont pas des pilotes de chasses ou des experts du pilotage ! c est sensé être un jeu fun pour le commun des mortels et c est l opposé ! vous êtes sensé prendre en chasse un enemi le mettre dans votre viseur et prendre votre pieds à le dégommer au lieu de ça on a des enemis qui virevoltent autour de nous comme des mouches c est juste horrible.. et je ne parle même pas du pvp des joeurs en arrow ou jouant en groupe !
This is a terrible idea, every single snowflake who hates MM to the core will be furiously answering this survey and sharing it around while most people like me who are content with MM and where they want to take it probably wont fill it out... This is a sign of weakness. A lack of confidence in their own vision and future plan for MM.
I doubt CIG even reads them anyways and a lot of people left over MM. Id rather play a living universe than a dead one🤷 it doesn't affect me either way but I don't think they are getting rid of MM
Yeah... sure. Someone doesn't agree with your opinion so better don't give them the opportunity to speak up. Getting cancelled for a different opinion is a massive problem nowadays. The real snowflakes are those who can't handle those different opinions. I don't like MM. It limits my abilities to handle critical situations when flying solo and being attacked. Before MM your actual skill was more important to win a fight than the stats of your ship. This doesn't mean that i attacked other players. But i had at least a good chance to survive when being attacked while flying C2 or 400i for example. It was more dependent on flight maneuvers and tactics. Speaking of the 400i, which is my favourite daily driver. As a runner it's not made for combat but rather to escape dangerous situations. So it highly depends on speed, shields and firepower to the back side. But someone at CIG seems to hate that ship. First they reduced the top speed by around 300m/s. Then MM was introduced. So now shields and turrets are deactivated while trying to get away. And now they remove 2/3 of power plants and coolers while adding more of them to the other ships in it's class. So there's not even redundancy left. This is extremely frustrating.
@@AlexanderDinebier they are just kicking a dead horse with the 400i lmao im glad I stopped supporting this game before I bought one I feel bad for every 400i owner though
Why you shouldn't do this together with people? Because you are a influencer, meaning you drive a narrative that will influence how people answer, and they don't have to think or experience something them self, and if they don't but feel like its their duty to be involved will answered either what you answered or the opposite, depending how much they like you. I don't blame you though, as its your jobb when doing videos. It invalidates the truthfulness of the survey though. witch CIG could claim if they don't like the answers they are getting. Of course depending on witch scale its done.
This is happening on both sides. Its quite entertaining watching SC videos and the next day going to spectrum and looking at all of the comments/topics just regurgitating (sometimes even verbatim) the talking points of content creators most recent video. Programmable npc's.
If you think any of this will change things think again. Marketing owns this game now, because C.R. only has eyes for SQ42, trying to relive his Wing Commander Heydays.
My FEEDBACK would be to sack the employer who tried to scam every single backer, we all know what i mean too.
The hud is awful, it needs to be able to be read, too often you cannot see because the HUD colours are too close the the background. a mechanism to change the hud colours in a user defined way would be more useful.
I filled it in, gave my honest opinion and told them they're taking the piss.
Now lets see if CIG pays any attention to the feedback that disagrees with their development direction...
some AI ships seem able to fly outside their envelope from time to time, it doesnt always happen, but when it does you will come across a reclaimer that can outrun and out turn you...
did you see how the Mighty Zeus destroyed that caterpillar in ISC, with its 2 mighty S4 guns and 2 ultra mighty S2 turrets?? :P
When they added master(bate) mode my world was shattered. I'm not even kidding, lol. I went through the stages of grief. Just flying around in SC was hands down the best experience in the history of gaming for me and now it's gone forever.
(Also a 10-year long backer)
Currently the thread on Spectrum is roughly 80% negative on Master Modes. The mob has spoken, Yogi needs to stop gaslighting.
This is just a ply by the developers to save face for all the issues. They dont need any surveys. There is enough comments on any online posters about the game.
I think MM will be good, in the long run, but I wish they had tuned it for the multi-role ships that everyone I know flies regularly instead of fucking most of the ships in favour of the light fighters (and the Hornets).
I noted that my subjective opinion is a throttled opinion based on their effort. And, that less marketing and more development is a much bigger priority.
Def good to do in the meantime, but so much of it will need fully revisiting once engineering and the desire to balance things so that everybody isn’t flying solo - ideally a mixed squad of people would be good. For now all ships riding solo is the meta.
Thanks, submitted.
3:45
what exactly does this even mean?
is it why my cutter constantly loses its winglets when even just parked and i turn my back on it for 10 seconds?
pour moi c est le gros point noir , pour un jeu de vaisseaux spatials les combats sont horribles et ils ont tendance à oublier que la plupart des joueurs ne sont sont pas des pilotes de chasses ou des experts du pilotage ! c est sensé être un jeu fun pour le commun des mortels et c est l opposé ! vous êtes sensé prendre en chasse un enemi le mettre dans votre viseur et prendre votre pieds à le dégommer au lieu de ça on a des enemis qui virevoltent autour de nous comme des mouches c est juste horrible.. et je ne parle même pas du pvp des joeurs en arrow ou jouant en groupe !
This is a terrible idea, every single snowflake who hates MM to the core will be furiously answering this survey and sharing it around while most people like me who are content with MM and where they want to take it probably wont fill it out...
This is a sign of weakness. A lack of confidence in their own vision and future plan for MM.
I doubt CIG even reads them anyways and a lot of people left over MM. Id rather play a living universe than a dead one🤷 it doesn't affect me either way but I don't think they are getting rid of MM
Yeah... sure. Someone doesn't agree with your opinion so better don't give them the opportunity to speak up. Getting cancelled for a different opinion is a massive problem nowadays. The real snowflakes are those who can't handle those different opinions.
I don't like MM. It limits my abilities to handle critical situations when flying solo and being attacked. Before MM your actual skill was more important to win a fight than the stats of your ship. This doesn't mean that i attacked other players. But i had at least a good chance to survive when being attacked while flying C2 or 400i for example. It was more dependent on flight maneuvers and tactics.
Speaking of the 400i, which is my favourite daily driver. As a runner it's not made for combat but rather to escape dangerous situations. So it highly depends on speed, shields and firepower to the back side. But someone at CIG seems to hate that ship. First they reduced the top speed by around 300m/s. Then MM was introduced. So now shields and turrets are deactivated while trying to get away. And now they remove 2/3 of power plants and coolers while adding more of them to the other ships in it's class. So there's not even redundancy left. This is extremely frustrating.
@@AlexanderDinebier they are just kicking a dead horse with the 400i lmao im glad I stopped supporting this game before I bought one I feel bad for every 400i owner though
Why you shouldn't do this together with people? Because you are a influencer, meaning you drive a narrative that will influence how people answer, and they don't have to think or experience something them self, and if they don't but feel like its their duty to be involved will answered either what you answered or the opposite, depending how much they like you. I don't blame you though, as its your jobb when doing videos. It invalidates the truthfulness of the survey though. witch CIG could claim if they don't like the answers they are getting. Of course depending on witch scale its done.
This is happening on both sides.
Its quite entertaining watching SC videos and the next day going to spectrum and looking at all of the comments/topics just regurgitating (sometimes even verbatim) the talking points of content creators most recent video.
Programmable npc's.
LOL from my experience, I am influencing very few if not hardly any people. Don't worry about that :)