Sam, The Car Guy Mazda is kicking goals in crash tests but it's not by accident. The fact they have the strongest steel in the automotive industry is not advertised much.
@@TJBellamy99 yeah with their 2nd attempt at a mass recall for engine fire that they still can't fix? and skimping on engine immobilizers to save a buck now offering it as a $170 upgrade? yeah... not getting behind that kind of "reliable" and business practice.
You might be speaking this a bit too soon. IIHS hasn't tested the CX-50 in the new tougher side impact test yet. I wouldn't be celebrating victory until the CX-50 aces that test as well.
This makes a lot of sense given that airbags are SRS - supplementary restraint system. Airbags must *always* be used in conjunction with a primary restraint. Of course, in all cases these days the primary restraint system is the seatbelt. The seatbelt is designed to hold the torso back, and the head will ultimately fall forward. The airbags must deploy in an area (i.e. chest) where the seatbelt has performed its function and the airbag is performing a secondary function. The only example I know of that was published were an airbag was altered to be a primary restraint was when Holden (Australia's old GM arm), did research on the American market prior to exporting. They found that the US had one of the lowest seatbelt wearing percentages of any advanced economy (a bit bewildering to Holden, because Australia had the highest percentage of seatbelt wearing). In surveys there was an attitude of "I can't be told to wear it and I won't". So Holden decided to double the size of the airbag purely for the American market. That thing would smack you in the face and chest...... Of course truth is, the seatbelt saves more lives than any airbag would, which is why they'll continue to have SRS printed on them. We MUST use seatbelts.
Strange how a rather small company like Mazda scores so high in crash tests. Didn't Mazda also hold the crown for the world's safest car for a while around 2-3 years ago?
Interestingly, I bought a Mazda 6 V6 hatchback in 2004, and at the time the Mazda 6 was considered the overall safest sedan you could buy. Granted that window of fame was short due to rapid innovations in safety, but it was something else for a brand like Mazda to get that sort of mention for the time.
@@ec23472 Chill dude, I wasn't being scientific about it. I was simply making a statement about how safe the Mazda 6 was considered FOR A BRIEF PERIOD OF TIME vs other family cars. My Mazda 6 had the optional side and torso airbags, and the one in the test did not. No cars fare well in side impact tests with no side curtain airbags. The 2004 S40 did only "Acceptable" in the IIHS side impact test WITH the side airbags. Your mention of the "Good" rating for the Mazda 6 moderate overlap test with a neck injury risk, well you have a neck injury risk in just about any vehicle in a frontal collision. They're not always perfectly linear like in IIHS or NHTSA testing.
@@ec23472 In my initial comment, I wasn't trying to start an argument. You were looking to apparently. I was simply making a statement based on an article I had read at the time where the writer noted the Mazda 6 as "the safest sedan on the road" (in so many words). I don't remember what publication it was in or I'd quote it directly. But you can go ahead and continue to nitpick this while comparing a compact with a midsize.
@@ec23472 You should really step away from the computer, go outside and breath some fresh air. I was saying that you brought up the Volvo S40, and THAT is a compact car whereas the 6 is a midsize. But please, go ahead and continue to obsess over this nothing burger of an "argument".
@@ec23472 Dude you are so lost. Go back to the beginning of this mess, expand all the comments between us and read them in a row. If you're as smart as you want me to believe you are, you'll see where you messed up. You are the one who mentioned the Volvo S40. The S40 is a compact car. It's also available as a sedan and wagon - a compact sedan or wagon. You seem to be confusing the sedan designation with the size designation. See? The Mazda 6 tested in this discussion was also a sedan, even though it was also made available in 2004 as a hatchback and a wagon. The Mazda 6 is considered a Mid-size vehicle. I hope this clears things up for your ridiculous stream of confusion.
Does IIHS report to the Manufacturer's Headquarters when they're are negatives in the crash tests? Does the Manufacturer fix them? For instance, The Honda Ridgeline pass. crash test... The passenger's head hit the dash... was this addressed to Honda?
Automakers are well aware of their crash test results. Typically representatives from an automaker are onsite during the test as well. Whether an automaker fixes something is up to them, but typically we do see them respond to bad results and make adjustments. Sometimes it will take some time and improvements will come with a redesign. Sometimes automakers will make running productions changes mid-year to address some issue. In the case of the Ridgeline's passenger-side small overlap result, we haven't yet seen them make changes, but it may come if/when they redesign that vehicle.
@@Safecaryt it would do good as the new tundra got TSP+ and it kinda shares the chassis plus its huge and heavy it would DESTROY a average car in a crash
are wheels desighned to fall off on most modern cars in accidents? been watching a lot of crash videos on youtube and many later model vehicles seem to lose their wheels in even a slight side impact
I feel the CX-50's driver airbag is smaller than usual. But that doesn't seem to have much impact on safety, the HIC is only 175. That means you can walk away after the crash. September 27, 2022 9:33PM
I agree with you and I also noticed that it looked like the driver's head favored the left side of the bag and possibly struck the rim of the steering wheel.
@@InexplicableBill the dummy was slowed down and directed into the left side of the airbag by the curtain so if the dummy hits the rim it would be a minor hit
Mazda I think did okay here. Not the best I've seen by them, though A-pillar structure and door access seem well-preserved. However, that front driver airbag seems extremely ineffective. Just a couple of centimeters more and no doubt the driver would've been face-to-face with the dash. I hope to see improvement for this model in the future. Slightly disappointed in a company that's maintained such high safety standards.
@@roostersideburns3440 Yes, overall the vehicle performed well. However, had this been at a higher speed, the driver's face no doubt would've met the steering wheel at a dangerous speed and force. I would hope that future models provide more cushioning for driver-side airbags.
it made pretty good but i think the only issue is that the airbag is a little bit small like i guess its good for not so tall people but this car was ment to be an offroader not a city car like the cx5 and maybe tall people will likely had some issues but everything else mazda did great work
Why do people think airbags are "pillows" for the head? They're extremely violent things and only intended to soften the blow. Airbags (SRS - Secondary Restraint) are meant to be this small because they're intended to cover the chest primarily (not the head) after a seatbelt (the PRS - Primary restraint). As long as the torso and head don't strike the dash and steering wheel, I suppose the seatbelt and airbag have done their job.
I'm 6' tall, so about 3 inches taller than the dummy, yet I sit with my seat in about the same position (short legs). So I'd be worried that my head would go over the airbag and hit the steering wheel rim. It looks barely tall enough here, one of the shortest airbags I've seen. I've been impressed with Mazda lately, this is a great structural design but the airbag does need some work. September 27, 2022 10:01 pm
Changing the angle of the steering wheel to allow you visibility of the dash would take care of that. This also appropriately changes the angle of the bag deployment
@@orlandohouse7214 Yeah but I’d prefer a car that can protect me regardless of steering wheel angle. I don’t need an airbag that goes all the way to the windshield, something like my 2011 Honda Accord would work. September 29, 2022 12:56 pm
The ratings are good for an SUV, but in general it's not that great. Head protection is on par with a 2007 Camry and feet Gs are in the 40s, which is high.
@@legioner9 I don't think it's ugly, but nor do I feel the urge of rushing to the nearest Mazda dealer to buy one. Besides, it's just a rebadged Toyota Corolla Cross, no?
Are there any tests with the female dummy? Particularly on the driver seat? This one is clearly a male. I am short, so I seat closer to the steering wheel, I also have breast, more sensitive neck and and different bone density.
@@MiroBG359 literally look it up, they do not share a frame, and even if they did the weight isn’t the same and the body structure isn’t the same, it would be different anyways.
In most of these small overlap crash tests the wheels either get ripped off or the rim itself shatters. It's pretty crazy. There are also a lot of car crash videos here on the 'Tube that show suspension components all over the place after crashes.
Nothing is more pleasing than seeing your personal vehicle do well in a crash test. Have had mine since April. Glad to see it’s a top performer
Sam, The Car Guy Mazda is kicking goals in crash tests but it's not by accident.
The fact they have the strongest steel in the automotive industry is not advertised much.
@@inodesnet I know if I had it, I’d market it as a selling point 😂
I always wondered, how does it feel to like to see your own car get demolished?
@@walter_248in this instance, it feels reassuring know it did good. Makes me feel a little more safe in my purchase decision
@@samthecarguy1143 Nice
It's really nice to see that Mazda keeps making very safe cars!
fr i keep recommending my teachers to get a newer one instead of a shitbox hyundai
@@J7Haip People who buy hyundai don't care, they're lured in by all the gimmicks and features with a low price.
@@J7Haip same
@@gwot Hyundais are some if the most safest and reliable cars these days.
@@TJBellamy99 yeah with their 2nd attempt at a mass recall for engine fire that they still can't fix? and skimping on engine immobilizers to save a buck now offering it as a $170 upgrade? yeah... not getting behind that kind of "reliable" and business practice.
Not surprised how Mazda got a good in this round. They're always well known for their safety and top notch build quality.
yep im telling everyone i can to get a new mazda
You might be speaking this a bit too soon. IIHS hasn't tested the CX-50 in the new tougher side impact test yet. I wouldn't be celebrating victory until the CX-50 aces that test as well.
@@CynicalBastard511 it's chassis is the same as the cx5 and it's a bit taller
@@CynicalBastard511 you are right but for currently even the 2017 CX5 has won over Volvo. I dont think there is any other suv safer than that already.
@@strike5677 mazda is tied for the safest car brand
That driver airbag seems a bit small in diameter.
you’re right, it seems tiny. very concerning
Y’all gotta remember that this car isn’t 100% made. It’s a 2023 car and it’s 2022
@@raybonnici5287 thats a 2023 model year but its a production model
@@raybonnici5287 it’s fully made and on sale
@@raybonnici5287
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
So true - let it mushroom into 2023 and test it again 👍
Thanks for THAT laugh!
Interesting how the steering wheel airbag deploys so low. Practically in your chest instead of your face, which impacts the _top_ of the airbag.
This makes a lot of sense given that airbags are SRS - supplementary restraint system.
Airbags must *always* be used in conjunction with a primary restraint. Of course, in all cases these days the primary restraint system is the seatbelt.
The seatbelt is designed to hold the torso back, and the head will ultimately fall forward. The airbags must deploy in an area (i.e. chest) where the seatbelt has performed its function and the airbag is performing a secondary function.
The only example I know of that was published were an airbag was altered to be a primary restraint was when Holden (Australia's old GM arm), did research on the American market prior to exporting.
They found that the US had one of the lowest seatbelt wearing percentages of any advanced economy (a bit bewildering to Holden, because Australia had the highest percentage of seatbelt wearing). In surveys there was an attitude of "I can't be told to wear it and I won't". So Holden decided to double the size of the airbag purely for the American market. That thing would smack you in the face and chest......
Of course truth is, the seatbelt saves more lives than any airbag would, which is why they'll continue to have SRS printed on them.
We MUST use seatbelts.
Strange how a rather small company like Mazda scores so high in crash tests.
Didn't Mazda also hold the crown for the world's safest car for a while around 2-3 years ago?
Interestingly, I bought a Mazda 6 V6 hatchback in 2004, and at the time the Mazda 6 was considered the overall safest sedan you could buy. Granted that window of fame was short due to rapid innovations in safety, but it was something else for a brand like Mazda to get that sort of mention for the time.
@@ec23472 Chill dude, I wasn't being scientific about it. I was simply making a statement about how safe the Mazda 6 was considered FOR A BRIEF PERIOD OF TIME vs other family cars. My Mazda 6 had the optional side and torso airbags, and the one in the test did not. No cars fare well in side impact tests with no side curtain airbags. The 2004 S40 did only "Acceptable" in the IIHS side impact test WITH the side airbags. Your mention of the "Good" rating for the Mazda 6 moderate overlap test with a neck injury risk, well you have a neck injury risk in just about any vehicle in a frontal collision. They're not always perfectly linear like in IIHS or NHTSA testing.
@@ec23472 In my initial comment, I wasn't trying to start an argument. You were looking to apparently. I was simply making a statement based on an article I had read at the time where the writer noted the Mazda 6 as "the safest sedan on the road" (in so many words). I don't remember what publication it was in or I'd quote it directly. But you can go ahead and continue to nitpick this while comparing a compact with a midsize.
@@ec23472 You should really step away from the computer, go outside and breath some fresh air. I was saying that you brought up the Volvo S40, and THAT is a compact car whereas the 6 is a midsize. But please, go ahead and continue to obsess over this nothing burger of an "argument".
@@ec23472 Dude you are so lost. Go back to the beginning of this mess, expand all the comments between us and read them in a row. If you're as smart as you want me to believe you are, you'll see where you messed up. You are the one who mentioned the Volvo S40. The S40 is a compact car. It's also available as a sedan and wagon - a compact sedan or wagon. You seem to be confusing the sedan designation with the size designation. See? The Mazda 6 tested in this discussion was also a sedan, even though it was also made available in 2004 as a hatchback and a wagon. The Mazda 6 is considered a Mid-size vehicle. I hope this clears things up for your ridiculous stream of confusion.
as always, mazda giving the best it has!
Does IIHS report to the Manufacturer's Headquarters when they're are negatives in the crash tests? Does the Manufacturer fix them?
For instance, The Honda Ridgeline pass. crash test...
The passenger's head hit the dash... was this addressed to Honda?
Automakers are well aware of their crash test results. Typically representatives from an automaker are onsite during the test as well. Whether an automaker fixes something is up to them, but typically we do see them respond to bad results and make adjustments. Sometimes it will take some time and improvements will come with a redesign. Sometimes automakers will make running productions changes mid-year to address some issue. In the case of the Ridgeline's passenger-side small overlap result, we haven't yet seen them make changes, but it may come if/when they redesign that vehicle.
@@iihs-hldi, Thank you for reponding and educating me!
I much appreciate this!
Why is front airbag so small?
Dang, this game's physics engine is lit!!
When did they started uploading in 2160p?
I'm really surprised that the Mazda CX-50 received the highest accolade.
Why does IIHS never test landcruisers or the new Lexus LX600? Iv’e never seen one if these full sized suvs doing the small overlap tests
Automakers aren’t going to pay for the testing on (high end, low volume) vehicles like those
Not enough sales. They're definitely not gonna waste money testing a $100k luxury car
Thanks, my mom has the car, but idk if its safe on a small overlap
@@Safecaryt it would do good as the new tundra got TSP+ and it kinda shares the chassis plus its huge and heavy it would DESTROY a average car in a crash
are wheels desighned to fall off on most modern cars in accidents? been watching a lot of crash videos on youtube and many later model vehicles seem to lose their wheels in even a slight side impact
Finally more crash tests
did they change the structure since 2022?
Will you be publishing the 2021-2022 Nissan Kicks? I'm curious if it has the same performance as the 2018 model
it does its only a minor facelift
Full ratings for the 2022 Nissan Kicks: www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/nissan/kicks-4-door-hatchback/2022
I feel the CX-50's driver airbag is smaller than usual. But that doesn't seem to have much impact on safety, the HIC is only 175. That means you can walk away after the crash.
September 27, 2022 9:33PM
I agree with you and I also noticed that it looked like the driver's head favored the left side of the bag and possibly struck the rim of the steering wheel.
September 27, 2020 9:33PM. Why?
@@InexplicableBill Sorry I mistyped :))
September 27, 2022 11:54PM
@@InexplicableBill the dummy was slowed down and directed into the left side of the airbag by the curtain so if the dummy hits the rim it would be a minor hit
@@lilmonix Ha I was wondering what sort of cryptic info line that was... lol I've never seen anyone date their comments before.
Wooow I didn’t know how safety Mazda is ,one more reason to buy what I’m looking for MAZDACX50 hybrid
Mazda I think did okay here. Not the best I've seen by them, though A-pillar structure and door access seem well-preserved. However, that front driver airbag seems extremely ineffective. Just a couple of centimeters more and no doubt the driver would've been face-to-face with the dash. I hope to see improvement for this model in the future. Slightly disappointed in a company that's maintained such high safety standards.
it did well not sure what youre on about
@@roostersideburns3440 Yes, overall the vehicle performed well. However, had this been at a higher speed, the driver's face no doubt would've met the steering wheel at a dangerous speed and force. I would hope that future models provide more cushioning for driver-side airbags.
Man I did not expect this from Mazda CX-5
How fast was vehicle going?
40 mph
it made pretty good but i think the only issue is that the airbag is a little bit small like i guess its good for not so tall people but this car was ment to be an offroader not a city car like the cx5 and maybe tall people will likely had some issues but everything else mazda did great work
Why do people think airbags are "pillows" for the head? They're extremely violent things and only intended to soften the blow.
Airbags (SRS - Secondary Restraint) are meant to be this small because they're intended to cover the chest primarily (not the head) after a seatbelt (the PRS - Primary restraint).
As long as the torso and head don't strike the dash and steering wheel, I suppose the seatbelt and airbag have done their job.
So an airbag won't hurt the body for road safety?
I have seen 2-3 mazda accidents including t bone and they all walked away from the car just fine.
I'm 6' tall, so about 3 inches taller than the dummy, yet I sit with my seat in about the same position (short legs). So I'd be worried that my head would go over the airbag and hit the steering wheel rim. It looks barely tall enough here, one of the shortest airbags I've seen. I've been impressed with Mazda lately, this is a great structural design but the airbag does need some work.
September 27, 2022 10:01 pm
Changing the angle of the steering wheel to allow you visibility of the dash would take care of that. This also appropriately changes the angle of the bag deployment
@@orlandohouse7214 Yeah but I’d prefer a car that can protect me regardless of steering wheel angle. I don’t need an airbag that goes all the way to the windshield, something like my 2011 Honda Accord would work.
September 29, 2022 12:56 pm
True
The ratings are good for an SUV, but in general it's not that great. Head protection is on par with a 2007 Camry and feet Gs are in the 40s, which is high.
@@leonzhu1301 2007 Camry didn't go through this test. That was the moderate overlap, deformable barrier etc to reduce forces.
Arkada oturanların sırt ve bel durumları nasıl?
Omg... the front just disintegrates
such an elegant car.
It just isn't.
@@legioner9 I don't think it's ugly, but nor do I feel the urge of rushing to the nearest Mazda dealer to buy one. Besides, it's just a rebadged Toyota Corolla Cross, no?
@@CynicalBastard511 Tf, no it's not lol
@@matthewalexis Oh OK, then. Thanks for the info.
@@sv52308 You're right. It's just a Mazda 3 on high reels.
Why is the cx 5 not good and the cx 50 is good? What major differences do they have
the cx 5 did good for front passemgers
Front left wheel busted completely off...........I think structurally the Toyotas hold up much better
What speed is its and what do you use for the new side crash?
This is a 40 mph frontal test with a 25% overlap
Ok thanks
Are there any tests with the female dummy? Particularly on the driver seat? This one is clearly a male. I am short, so I seat closer to the steering wheel, I also have breast, more sensitive neck and and different bone density.
Is there plans to test any full-size SUVS like a Chevy Suburban or a Toyota Sequoia?
look at how the Silverado performs. Same car
@@MiroBG359 not really
@@evanthepleaseimsorry4663 yes really, it's the same car - frame and chassis as Silverado, minus the truck bed.
@@MiroBG359 literally look it up, they do not share a frame, and even if they did the weight isn’t the same and the body structure isn’t the same, it would be different anyways.
We don't have any immediate plans to evaluate the Suburban or Sequoia.
First time I've seen a tire get dislodged
In most of these small overlap crash tests the wheels either get ripped off or the rim itself shatters. It's pretty crazy. There are also a lot of car crash videos here on the 'Tube that show suspension components all over the place after crashes.
Isn’t this the same crash sound as the Ioniq 5?
i think it is
Sometimes the use a previous sound if the original sound didn’t record.
i think yes
The CX-50 is just a CX-5 with better styling.
The entire engine came out that doesn’t seem right
😊
Acceptable on updated side impact test. Outback is safer.
Lol subaru fanatics
@@rmduwk jealous trolls
First!😊
lyer
Pretty POOR crash test. KIA sportage does better
😂😂😂