$500K house mistakenly built on woman's plot: 'Eyesore on my property' | NewsNation Prime

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 апр 2024
  • A woman who purchased a vacant lot in Hawaii was surprised to find out a $500,000 house was built on the property by mistake. On "NewsNation Prime," Annaleine Reynolds says she is now mired in legal wrangling over the mix-up.
    #realestate #hawaii #homeowners
    "NewsNation Prime" is America’s source for unbiased news offering a full range of perspectives from across the U.S. Weekends starting at 7p/6C. #Prime
    NewsNation is your source for fact-based, unbiased news for all America.
    More from NewsNation: www.newsnationnow.com/
    Get our app: trib.al/TBXgYpp
    Find us on cable: trib.al/YDOpGyG
    How to watch on TV or streaming: trib.al/Vu0Ikij

Комментарии • 54

  • @latymz
    @latymz Месяц назад +39

    This is why the justice system is a mess. The court needs to penalize the builders. She should be compensated for all this nonsense. Screw the developers. Due your due diligence.

  • @SavageListener
    @SavageListener Месяц назад +17

    She must win because this case sets precedence for land owners vs. builders getting away with usurping land for profit.

  • @Junitunes
    @Junitunes Месяц назад +24

    I don’t think in any situation she should lose in court. This is insane

    • @mc_sim
      @mc_sim Месяц назад +1

      remember this is america - anything can happen in court. OJ got out, Derek Chauvin got jail time for nothing & etc. she got the house? pay for it. 😀

    • @Junitunes
      @Junitunes Месяц назад

      @@mc_sim so wild to me in america people can just kill people cause they’re cops and it’s so normal it’s ok by lots of peoples standards.

  • @Christ810
    @Christ810 Месяц назад +9

    Should be no Legal battle whatsoever and any judge that doesn't right this wrong done to this woman is not sufficient to be a judge !

  • @jbrunch8082
    @jbrunch8082 Месяц назад +17

    How do you accidently build a house somewhere?

    • @hawaiiguy1
      @hawaiiguy1 Месяц назад +3

      because they did not have a survey done per the local Hawaii news... depended on the locations of the existing telephone poles in the area.

    • @Christ810
      @Christ810 Месяц назад +2

      Stupidity only 😂

  • @ricardoalmanza4855
    @ricardoalmanza4855 Месяц назад +14

    The whole coordinates and zodiac sign was a wild comment lol

    • @seti4967
      @seti4967 Месяц назад +1

      😂 🤣

    • @mickfitz76
      @mickfitz76 Месяц назад

      She wants spiritual damages. Hurt my cosmic alignment.

    • @SkinnyVinnie
      @SkinnyVinnie Месяц назад +1

      Her lawyer def knows how to make the damages compensation go up! 😂

  • @annegoodreau4925
    @annegoodreau4925 Месяц назад +13

    Somebody has not done a title search at all, or done it improperly. There's a lawyer's office, or the development company, that did not do due diligence. "She" has to resolve it? No way, they are trying to get her to think that so she won't sue and report the real culprits.

  • @traceysumner4781
    @traceysumner4781 Месяц назад +14

    So I guess she can start charging a land lease

  • @johnbrown4949
    @johnbrown4949 Месяц назад +6

    Plot twist, the developers are the squatters

  • @David53D
    @David53D Месяц назад +7

    Rent out the house to pay the increased taxes until it is resolved although I don't see what can be resolved except the builder sucks up his mistake or the land owner sues the builder. The builder suing the land owner doesn't seem like it will succeed.

  • @naomiby9556
    @naomiby9556 Месяц назад +2

    Sue the builders sue the contractors sue the surveyor sue the electrician sue hawaii sue the squatters

  • @gliderrider
    @gliderrider Месяц назад +5

    Stay on this!

  • @TiffanyBakerAwanderer
    @TiffanyBakerAwanderer Месяц назад +2

    Why interview someone and not give them time to speak? Wth

  • @caseynabors6235
    @caseynabors6235 Месяц назад +5

    Wait how can the builder charge the land owner where house was mistakenly built or perhaps they meant the builder is charging the land owner who was having the house built 🤷🏻 weird to say the least. Something is fishy here for sure 👍

    • @RealPackCat
      @RealPackCat Месяц назад +1

      Go to the blueprints. If the developer planned the house on her property, it is the developer who should be sued. If the Builder built on the wrong land not provided in the blueprints, then they should be 100% liable. The own has no part of the dispute between the developer and the builder. She should immediately put up a fence around her property with a no trespassing sign.

  • @greorbowlfinder7078
    @greorbowlfinder7078 Месяц назад +8

    The AG should charge the builder with grand larceny in the 1st degee and threaten him with a 30 year prison sentence unless he 'resolves it." He owes her at least 5 million dollars. And removing the house entirely and restoring all the vegitation. Or he can do 30 years in prison, liquidate his company and pay her everything from the liquidation.

  • @Kandiladi
    @Kandiladi Месяц назад +2

    That wasn't a mistake

  • @Loadrunner620
    @Loadrunner620 Месяц назад +2

    Legally they can not make her pay. She can sue them for not using a surveyor. sue for trespassing etc emotional damages.

  • @A3Kr0n
    @A3Kr0n Месяц назад +7

    WTF? Seriously. WTF? And I only watched the first 34 seconds.

  • @beelikemizu604
    @beelikemizu604 Месяц назад +9

    I'm betting the court is going to force her to switch plots with the developers as they're side-by-side & they're not going to let her walk away from this with a free 1/2 mil home. Not fair, but I bet the court does that & that's why the developer is suing her for their mistake.

    • @Nanno00
      @Nanno00 Месяц назад +16

      Interesting take. I think the court will make the developers tear down the house and return infant, native vegetation so it can grow back. I think the judge will say it’s their responsibility to clean up their own mistakes and that that’s the cost of being in business.

    • @rosekrause6572
      @rosekrause6572 Месяц назад

      ​@@Nanno00should be so!

    • @RealPackCat
      @RealPackCat Месяц назад +1

      Any decent attorney would have their suit dismissed as frivolous.

  • @richardwinser6161
    @richardwinser6161 Месяц назад

    It’s her property she shouldn’t be sued!! I hope she wins her case !!!

  • @Dawn-zo2ny
    @Dawn-zo2ny Месяц назад +1

    i wonder if the squatters had anything to do with it...Sounds like a new scam...

  • @clintboggess6728
    @clintboggess6728 Месяц назад +3

    If this is allowed to stand then contractors will just start building houses wherever they feel like. They will just start stealing peoples land!!

  • @RealPackCat
    @RealPackCat Месяц назад

    Counter-sue for the cost of demolition. The case will settle quickly.

  • @4fun256
    @4fun256 27 дней назад

    If the developer win this case in court, the people who own lands be prepare for what coming in your way.

  • @soteful9949
    @soteful9949 27 дней назад

    She lost me at this point. 3:50 That's just some crazy right there.

  • @InWhoseOpinion
    @InWhoseOpinion 25 дней назад

    The reporter asked the land owner what is wrong with a free house on her property. The builder and developers are not offering her the house for free. Even in a fantasy world where she was offered a free house, she didn't ask for the house, and it's not in line with her intentions for her property. The reporter made the property owner sound ungrateful and crazy.

  • @1summerflower
    @1summerflower Месяц назад +2

    😭💔🙏🏼

  • @BurningSmith
    @BurningSmith Месяц назад

    The "Squatters" are probably victims too. Swapping lands with some compensation or for a better land would be an fair option, if this was an honest mistake. But if she want's the land back, then the investor has to tear it down.

    • @RealPackCat
      @RealPackCat Месяц назад

      Hard to tear it down if she builds a fence around it and puts up a no trespassing sign.

  • @svetadarling
    @svetadarling Месяц назад

    I was all ready to feel bad for this lady until she opened her mouth

    • @Chapps1941
      @Chapps1941 Месяц назад +1

      That's her choice and yours. But it remains, at law, that the wrong thing has been done. It should be made right despite what you, her or I think.

  • @wileecoyote5749
    @wileecoyote5749 Месяц назад +1

    Hawaii a Blue State,enjoy

  • @alexandranitana295
    @alexandranitana295 Месяц назад

    You can’t make this $hit up.

  • @FlipMacz
    @FlipMacz Месяц назад

    😮😮

  • @mariadorosario8293
    @mariadorosario8293 Месяц назад

    🎉😇💙💙💙🙏🌏🇱🇷

  • @preshisify
    @preshisify Месяц назад

    😷 ☕

  • @DefNotAdog
    @DefNotAdog Месяц назад

    Well there is a law , if she KNEW it was being built. Even if its accidentally she is liable

  • @johnconnelly3066
    @johnconnelly3066 Месяц назад +3

    Sacred land? What a wack job