Grace Kelly. Perfection. She raised the bar on "Elegant Bride". Pristine perfection. A rare jewel. Serene, full of poise, class, dignity. Her whole wedding ceremony was exquisitely elegant.
Those dresses are something else most of the long gowns are so elegant and l wonder did the Duchess of Cambridge look at this video because their are some similarities to her gown. The video is excellent by the way.
Grace Kelly all the way ... Meghan Markle needs to spend a few hours watching all she can on how an American actress married a royal and became such a wonderful Princess, much loved by the people of Monaco .. it might reduce all the nastiness going on about The Duchess of Sussex
Grace Kelly’s is stunning and so classic! I think that’s where Kate Middleton got her inspiration for her wedding gown when she married Prince William.
Back in the days of the seriously stylish bride, regardless of what type of wedding they had....Most like Grace Kelly but there were also other beautiful brides dressed to suit their body type, wedding type, their era etc. The fishtail style looked nit quite right on her... Tall big statuesque woman in a mermaid tail get up? Fine. Curvey woman, any size or height dressed in a fistail style, even if slim? No, I don't think so. This style is for the tall slim, type with few, if any curves. The style gives her curves she lacks. The Depression era ones looked drab, as expected. Some old brides from that era tell me white weddi g dress fabric was hard to get, very expensive. My owmotber said they opted for a dress that looked good, not white a d which could be used again for important social events after marriage for many years, as a "Best dress". Latin brides of that era added a white lace mantilla veil for a first marriage. Widows remarrying wore a black lace mantilla. The white lace one was for first time brides and single girls to wear to church. Once married, you rose in social status and were allowed to wear a black lace ma tilla veil and expected to do so, at relevant occasions calli g for women to cover hair eg church. The Anglo brides of that era sometimes wore fasci ator type hats with cineray netting. These were also used again later on eg go to the Melbourne Cup horse racing carnival that requires formaattire, even in pouri ng rain or summer sweltering heat. Whilst tbe big gowns look nice, tbey are a waste of mo ey, though some smart brides did alter ordye theetc, to wear to speciaballs etc. I saw some of tbese out in rural Australia. But, even back then, the rich and snobby would not attend such a ball in a co verted wedding dress or a bridesmaid dress, tbough many did. Tbe rich and hauggty would nit attend local cou try events where such fucould be had, even in converted weddin g dress eg to celebrate your weddi g anniv ersary, which required months of dieting, to prove you could still fit into it, despite babies etc. The rich went to borin g city social events tbey never talked about and nobody was interested in such urban parties etc they attended, anyways... But, si nce the afflyent Melbourne high society required an expensive new set of attire for every new social occasion, the rural rich attending these ended up donating their exclusive gowns worn only once, to Melbourne charirities. Cou try locals would then take a trip to buy tgese second hand, alter them and pass them off as "new stylish city clothes" as they tried to put on urban airs and vraves. But we all k ew tbey had to milk cows, shear sheep, grow beans, catchfish etc to live, like the rest of us. But it was fun because such dresses ended up bei g passed from woman to woman in the locality, to shine in socially, continually added to, remodelled etc. And e e tuallendi g up as dress up costumes in schools for kids to wear at school concerts. Nothing was wasted. No rubbish goi g to landfill or pollutioproblems. Because people had too little to produce pollutin g rubbish. They made do. Even tbe rich complained about having to have a new expe sive kutfit to attend some exclusive event tbeir ptesence was expected at. But, since they were boun d by a rigid code of what their socioeconomic class deemed to be "appropriate" ie very strict dress rules, manners, staionary use, language etc, they simply had to co form and buy yet another costly silk dtess, hat, kid gloves or whatever. It is now commo n for even affluent urban women to vintage shop for clothes in local country second hand charity stores wbere they vet a thrill over the old "treasures" they find eg old mangey moth eatecrud dati ng back to the war era etc that no local decent country woman wouldbe seen dead in.But,even as rece tly as the 70's no local woman shopped for second clothes in an opportunity or charity store. It was shamed, though it was perfectly OK to wear hand me downs from friendly neighbours etc, as many did eg school uniforms were typically passed from family to family as each batch of kids grew up. It saved families a fortune and kids were always in proper uniform, even if poor. The rules for uniform etc were very strict, even in rough go ernment schools and eing out of uniform was serious. There was no excuse. Not even for very poor kids, who were often in old faded uniforms, but always wearing it. To avoid so. E kids being considered inferior to others, based on their clothing parents could orckuldnot afford. A very good idea, to create mire equality, less bullying, thuggery, put downs etc that often revolve around kids' fashions, especially nowadays And technology, holidays etc.
Did you expect the Depression era dresses to look drab so they were to you? Ginger Rogers' dress was wonderfully decorated and floating and the hat added a new touch, Ingrid Bergman's was classic, Joan Fontaine's was soft and cuddly and feminine. None of them is drab at all. My mother got married in the Depression and her wedding wasn't drab, either. She had a pretty dress she made herself, which she could do well because she was a home economics teacher. I do have trouble with some Roaring Twenties dresses because they can look really clunky and contrived. As much as I liked the Queen Mother, her wedding dress (not in this video) didn't flatter her at all. It made her look like she was wearing a Queen of Hearts-type costume. I wish we had a better view of Norma Shearer's dress but huge bouquets were in vogue so we may never know what that looked like.
Rogers Ginger Joan Fontaine Rita Haywort - 1949 (2 dress) Elisabeth Taylor 1950 (1 dress) - > 3 place Audrey Hepburn Debbie Reynolds Grace Kelly - > 2 place Julie Andrews - > is my favorite 1 place
While big shoulders is one of my least favorite fashions, I choose for first place the stars who opted to wear a suit out of respect for the suffering and sacrifice during the war rather than acting as if this is the time to splash out with a big party. They were saying that the world isn't all about me, me, wonderful me. Refreshing. :)
Not all these brides are actually wearing bridal gowns. Some are in street clothes. I don't understand why they would wear street clothes. 😝😝 All those beautiful towns to choose from and they wear street clothes ? What's up with that ??? 😱😱 I like Liz Taylor's and Princess Grace's gowns. Some weren't even full view fotos so I can't comment on those . Brides should wear bridal gowns.
Antonina MacNeish And some did not. Such is life. It's hard to know what the dark side is of someone well-versed in assuming different characters. Of course Newman and Woodward stayed the course. The ones that make me sad are those separated from a loved one by early death. I hope they could cling to the memory of their time together rather than mourn forever over what they had lost.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
All the dresses reflected the personality of each bride at the time. All I thought were beautiful in their own way. I so enjoyed watching this video.
Grace Kelly. Perfection. She raised the bar on "Elegant Bride". Pristine perfection. A rare jewel. Serene, full of poise, class, dignity. Her whole wedding ceremony was exquisitely elegant.
One of her costume designers made that happen for her. It's gorgeous, isn't it?
Audrey Hepburn in her first wedding dress and Princess Grace both looked so beautiful and other worldly. Loved this video.
Nice collection of photos!
Love the short dresses and suits.
La Liz in her 1st dress. Perfection all around.
Grace Kelly....timeless elegance.
Elizabeth Taylor 1950 what a stunning dress
Thank you for these beautiful pictures !!!. I can't pick just one favorite. Love the silks.
Grace Kelly. She is the ultimate in elegance and beauty.
Grace Kelly, by far. Then Debbie Reynolds and Liz Taylor's first gown.
Hands down Grace Kelley! The picture of Royal elegance....
Grace Kelly & Elizabeth Taylor's first gown.
Grace Kelly
It's Ingrid Bergman, not Burgman. Love the dresses!
Grace Kelly for the best version of the classic bride, Audrey Hepburn for the best modern interpretation
Beautiful!
Grace of Monaco sublime
Those dresses are something else most of the long gowns are so elegant and l wonder did the Duchess of Cambridge look at this video because their are some similarities to her gown. The video is excellent by the way.
I love Audrey Hepburn's wedding dress.
I love grace Kelly's wedding gown too.
Beautiful.thanks
So much beauty and elegance it's hard to pick Grace Kelly
Most beautiful woman and gown. Would have to be Grace Kelly
I think she was very beautiful!! , Grace Kelly looked like a porcelain Doll!??
Grace Kelly all the way ... Meghan Markle needs to spend a few hours watching all she can on how an American actress married a royal and became such a wonderful Princess, much loved by the people of Monaco .. it might reduce all the nastiness going on about The Duchess of Sussex
Collette Landwer You don't recognize any difference between them that might bring down nastiness upon Meghan and not on Grace??
Grace Kelley then Elizabeth Taylor
Liz Taylor first wedding to Nikki Hilton. Next Grace Kelly
Grace simply perfect
Grace Kelley. Stunning.
Grace Kelly’s is stunning and so classic! I think that’s where Kate Middleton got her inspiration for her wedding gown when she married Prince William.
Elizabeth Taylor's 1950,Grace Kelly, Debbie Reynolds, Julie Andrews.
Grace. Love
My all time Favorite will always be Norma Shearer!
Liz Taylor for Nicki Hilton, grace kelly and Marilyn Monroe
All bow to Grace Kelly! So beautiful
Todas lembranças são lindas.
All memories are gorgeous
Anyone knows which song is the one in piano?
Lena horne and dorothy d.
Oh wait...they didn't make the list.
Grace Kelly: a timeless elegance
Liz Taylor first dress.
Back in the days of the seriously stylish bride, regardless of what type of wedding they had....Most like Grace Kelly but there were also other beautiful brides dressed to suit their body type, wedding type, their era etc. The fishtail style looked nit quite right on her... Tall big statuesque woman in a mermaid tail get up? Fine. Curvey woman, any size or height dressed in a fistail style, even if slim? No, I don't think so. This style is for the tall slim, type with few, if any curves. The style gives her curves she lacks. The Depression era ones looked drab, as expected. Some old brides from that era tell me white weddi g dress fabric was hard to get, very expensive. My owmotber said they opted for a dress that looked good, not white a d which could be used again for important social events after marriage for many years, as a "Best dress". Latin brides of that era added a white lace mantilla veil for a first marriage. Widows remarrying wore a black lace mantilla. The white lace one was for first time brides and single girls to wear to church. Once married, you rose in social status and were allowed to wear a black lace ma tilla veil and expected to do so, at relevant occasions calli g for women to cover hair eg church. The Anglo brides of that era sometimes wore fasci ator type hats with cineray netting. These were also used again later on eg go to the Melbourne Cup horse racing carnival that requires formaattire, even in pouri ng rain or summer sweltering heat. Whilst tbe big gowns look nice, tbey are a waste of mo ey, though some smart brides did alter ordye theetc, to wear to speciaballs etc. I saw some of tbese out in rural Australia. But, even back then, the rich and snobby would not attend such a ball in a co verted wedding dress or a bridesmaid dress, tbough many did. Tbe rich and hauggty would nit attend local cou try events where such fucould be had, even in converted weddin g dress eg to celebrate your weddi g anniv ersary, which required months of dieting, to prove you could still fit into it, despite babies etc. The rich went to borin g city social events tbey never talked about and nobody was interested in such urban parties etc they attended, anyways... But, si nce the afflyent Melbourne high society required an expensive new set of attire for every new social occasion, the rural rich attending these ended up donating their exclusive gowns worn only once, to Melbourne charirities. Cou try locals would then take a trip to buy tgese second hand, alter them and pass them off as "new stylish city clothes" as they tried to put on urban airs and vraves. But we all k ew tbey had to milk cows, shear sheep, grow beans, catchfish etc to live, like the rest of us. But it was fun because such dresses ended up bei g passed from woman to woman in the locality, to shine in socially, continually added to, remodelled etc. And e e tuallendi g up as dress up costumes in schools for kids to wear at school concerts. Nothing was wasted. No rubbish goi g to landfill or pollutioproblems. Because people had too little to produce pollutin g rubbish. They made do. Even tbe rich complained about having to have a new expe sive kutfit to attend some exclusive event tbeir ptesence was expected at. But, since they were boun d by a rigid code of what their socioeconomic class deemed to be "appropriate" ie very strict dress rules, manners, staionary use, language etc, they simply had to co form and buy yet another costly silk dtess, hat, kid gloves or whatever. It is now commo n for even affluent urban women to vintage shop for clothes in local country second hand charity stores wbere they vet a thrill over the old "treasures" they find eg old mangey moth eatecrud dati ng back to the war era etc that no local decent country woman wouldbe seen dead in.But,even as rece tly as the 70's no local woman shopped for second clothes in an opportunity or charity store. It was shamed, though it was perfectly OK to wear hand me downs from friendly neighbours etc, as many did eg school uniforms were typically passed from family to family as each batch of kids grew up. It saved families a fortune and kids were always in proper uniform, even if poor. The rules for uniform etc were very strict, even in rough go ernment schools and eing out of uniform was serious. There was no excuse. Not even for very poor kids, who were often in old faded uniforms, but always wearing it. To avoid so. E kids being considered inferior to others, based on their clothing parents could orckuldnot afford. A very good idea, to create mire equality, less bullying, thuggery, put downs etc that often revolve around kids' fashions, especially nowadays And technology, holidays etc.
Did you expect the Depression era dresses to look drab so they were to you? Ginger Rogers' dress was wonderfully decorated and floating and the hat added a new touch, Ingrid Bergman's was classic, Joan Fontaine's was soft and cuddly and feminine. None of them is drab at all. My mother got married in the Depression and her wedding wasn't drab, either. She had a pretty dress she made herself, which she could do well because she was a home economics teacher. I do have trouble with some Roaring Twenties dresses because they can look really clunky and contrived. As much as I liked the Queen Mother, her wedding dress (not in this video) didn't flatter her at all. It made her look like she was wearing a Queen of Hearts-type costume. I wish we had a better view of Norma Shearer's dress but huge bouquets were in vogue so we may never know what that looked like.
Grace Kelly, hands down. Second Brigitte Bardot.
Audrey Hepburn's dress without a doubt!! She weard second most beautiful wedding gown ever! The first one was mine 😍😍😍😁😁😁😁
I love the first Elizabeth Taylor dress
Grace Kelly. 😃
Rogers Ginger
Joan Fontaine
Rita Haywort - 1949 (2 dress)
Elisabeth Taylor 1950 (1 dress) - > 3 place
Audrey Hepburn
Debbie Reynolds
Grace Kelly - > 2 place
Julie Andrews - > is my favorite 1 place
Grace Kelly and Elizabeth Taylor first wedding
Audrey Hepburn and Debbie Reynolds I like the most.
Audrey is my definite favorite!!💗✝️⚜️
Debbie Reynolds is the cutest!
Elizabeth Taylor's first dress, and Grace Kelly's
Grace Kelly...simple elegance
While big shoulders is one of my least favorite fashions, I choose for first place the stars who opted to wear a suit out of respect for the suffering and sacrifice during the war rather than acting as if this is the time to splash out with a big party. They were saying that the world isn't all about me, me, wonderful me. Refreshing. :)
Liz Taylor
Grace Kelly 😍 with style...hallo from bosna and Hercegovine
Ingrid Bergman! Escriban bien!
Princess Grace hands down
Look at other pictures of Ingrid Bergmanns Wedding dress and see who inspired Caroline Besset
Ginger Rogers is favorite
Es Ingrid Bergman, no Burgman
Grace Kelly for sure
Elizabeth Taylor and Grace Kelly and Audrey Hepburn
Grace Kelly was so clasic.
Lindos!
Not all these brides are actually wearing bridal gowns. Some are in street clothes. I don't understand why they would wear street clothes. 😝😝 All those beautiful towns to choose from and they wear street clothes ? What's up with that ??? 😱😱 I like Liz Taylor's and Princess Grace's gowns. Some weren't even full view fotos so I can't comment on those . Brides should wear bridal gowns.
Elizabeth Taylor first an second and Ginger Rogers
Senz.altro la numero 1 Haudry Epburn per grazia e particolari
Rita Hayworth. ..disappointing
Grace Kelly
Almost all those marriages ended up badly.
Antonina MacNeish And some did not. Such is life. It's hard to know what the dark side is of someone well-versed in assuming different characters. Of course Newman and Woodward stayed the course. The ones that make me sad are those separated from a loved one by early death. I hope they could cling to the memory of their time together rather than mourn forever over what they had lost.
Ingrid Bergman.....
Ingrid Bergman and not Burgman.
Elizabeth y bardot
Poor Doris Day was abused by one of her husbands...idk if it was this one or not, there were 3 I think.
#1 Grace Kelly - no question.
#2 Liz Taylor 1950.
But now Jayne Mansfield was just an awful mess!!! 🤭🤫😒👎
Ninguno como el de grave Kelly
Ingrid BERGMAN..shame on you!!
Grace Kelly
Grace Kelly
Grace Kelly
Grace Kelly