Stockfish 1 with Extra Knight vs Stockfish 14

[@Swysho]

Humans : spend 14 years improving an ai to play chess . Some random horse : allow me to introduce myself

[@DaGaJbmKojJe]

I like how the extra knight didn't move until move 39

[@VR36030]

So additional material is a much larger handicap than loss of material.

[@Γιώργος-ε6τ]

One knight extra destroys all the development of 14 years

[@kelemenaron2]

Stockfish 1 saw mate in 8 faster than Stockfish 14 at the end

[@Batman15830]

Не думал, что всего одна лёгкая фигура даёт такое преимущество.

[@turkiyett0928]

Thanks for accept my suggesion and thumbail is so good

[@larrycarter3765]

suggesion ?

[@juan9715]

Can you please make a video using the Zebra? Its like a knight with a longer movement I think :)

[@NeuralChess]

Yes, a video about "long knight" is coming soon, but I'm not sure about the name. That piece has many titles. :)

[@juan9715]

@@NeuralChess yaaaay. Its the zebra look here :D en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_(chess)

[@ahmadjauhar4562]

Wait, didn't you once upload a video of stockfish 14 with rook handicap vs stockfish 1 and the 14 is actually winning? Why it is losing now

[@NeuralChess]

Yes, very interesting indeed. I guess extra material is stronger than loss of material.

[@M4niacks2]

Maybe because the extra knight also comes already developed, even if not on a good position.

[@JOBAVALONDONONLY420]

@@NeuralChessas you activate rooks rather later in the game maybe Sf14 was able to equalise before white could play out the advantage

[@pargm9543]

After 14 year from now all engine play only draw

[@deleteeast8520]

I think pawn odds would actually be fair

[@klingenschmidt9261]

Woah. Can't believe stockfish won

[@HatterTobias]

Please do knight+king (centaur)

[@turkiyett0928]

Try this without e d c pawn it would be fair

[@kelemenaron2]

How is stockfish 1 stronger only with a knight when there's a 2500 elő gap? Or wasn't it stockfish 1?

[@VR36030]

It's a 800 Elo gap. Stockfish 1 of 2008 is different than the stockfish level one on lichess.

[@2thirds]

1 as in version from 2008, and not lvl 1 from lichess

[@-crimway6615]

Could you do two extra pawns?

[@paulhk2727]

Huh? I thought Stockfish 1 is the one that randomly blunders peaces? At least when you set Stockfish 1 on Lichess it's always an easy win

[@NeuralChess]

I think that is Stockfish Level 1. This is Stockfish version 1.0 from 2008 with full strength.

[@paulhk2727]

@@NeuralChess Ah ok lol thanks for clearing me up.

[@larrycarter3765]

peaces ?

[@wontcreep]

another demonstration that numbers beats technique

[@michaelrupf776]

Not every move seemed logic to me..

[@keymasta3260]

What is the point of this video? Side with extra Knight is winning, right? Question is how beautiful

[@antoniojoaquinruizalfonso4232]

Well, Stockfish 14 was missing a rook in this video and the result wasn't the same. ruclips.net/video/tyVZ9drznXg/видео.html

[@redstoneproff1581]

I think shuld have more search

[@larrycarter3765]

shuld ?

[@name19855]

Я гриб

[@redstoneproff1581]

the game is not very consistent

[@El_Girasol_Fachero]

First 😃🌟

[@sujatasharma8560]

Stockfish 1 with extra knight can't even win always against Stockfish level 2 and you are showing total rubbish!