Because he was saying that he had unlocked every gun in the gam which is wrong because he was/is still missing 10 weapons. Thats what takes the most time. He wanted to state that he had everything after a week which is absolutely nonsense
True, unlocked every weapon in the game in the first week. Said it in a polite way? And no i was missing 3 not 10. (Each class has one special lvl 10 gun and i had the hellreigel and the martini henry)
klutz395 I actually hate COD... Battlefield is blessed... I don’t know what he means by role playing tho? I think there should be more recoil based attachments like a fore grip but it’s WW1 shouldn’t be laser sights or holo sights
aaron stelmach I'm talking to OP, but I get your point. Customization is cool and all, but I'd much rather have fun, authentic gameplay than play dress-up with guns. BC2 and BF2 didn't have extensive gun customization, and no one cared. Games only started to have gun customization after COD4 came out.
"Opinion", BF1 is still a child at the moment and BF4 has been and still in 3 years of support. Give BF1 a chance, if you didn't enjoy the game, it doesn't make the same more suck than BF4 and reverse.
Timotheus Kazlav BF4 was broken at launch and it's taken dice 3 years to sort things out and it's still has problems. At least BF1 wasn't a major POS at launch.
I had fun, till i unlocked everything, in about 150 hours. I have used and reused all the weapons numerous times. BF4 had more weapons/gadgets/vehicles which kept me interested and entertained. BF1 literally has fuck all content. The new battlepacks are cancer (like you) and simply having one weapon and making "different variants" is fucking pathetic. More weapons plz.
Forced to do this shite Hate u google Yes the battle packs are legit cancer. And yes, weapon variants are padding. But the sentiment behind it that you display is the sentiment of an entitled and expecting of superfluous crap, jackass. Players shouldn't need their games to have all this extra stuff for it to qualify in their eyes.
It's almost as if people want and enjoy different things from their games than you, and apparently anyone that doesn't think exactly as you do is an entitled dumbfuck. The past 3 games have had an abundance of this "superfluous crap", so obviously people are going to expect more than the small amount of content in this game and they definitely are entitled to it considering they're the ones paying for it.
That "superfluous crap" played a big part in keeping people interested/entertained in the game till the next BF is released and the next Battlefield is at least 2 years away, even if BF1 releases 4 new weapons with every new DLC it will still have less weapons than bf4 did on release.
***** A lack of content has nothing to do with entitlement. EA is one of the biggest gaming companies in the world, the fact they released a game with such a piss poor amount of content when the clearly have the ability and $$$ shows they either rushed the game or potentially want to string out content extremely slowly via DLC's meaning those who did not buy premium will have to if they more than the current pitiful offering. Then there was the free map DLC which was panned by numerous RUclipsrs as an after thought, something to keep people from complaining about how little content there actually is.
They intentionally left out some of the most common weapons of ww1 (mosin Nagant) just so they could save it for DLC. That's like buying a hamburger but the bun is extra. Wtf dice
@@enjoi9970 i just cant wait to see people saying that battlfield 5 was better than battlefield 2042 when it comes out. (battlfield 5 had many flaws but it was a really fun game, i wish how they would get things right so it would'nt die so early)
VancouverCanucksRock thats what im trying to figure out bruv..how do they go from the great reward system from bf4 with all those cool ribbons to this crap??
Your Friendly Neighborhood Athies No way, all the maps are the same dull boring themes. Lancang Dam, Siege, Rogue transmission (even more) are pretty memorable and unique in appearance.
jevillo p i dont know what you are talking about, but he complained that bf4 had too many weapons. bf1 takes levelcaps advice and levelcap complains about it.
You have to strike that magical balance in number of weapons because if you don't you either have a bunch of useless guns in the game that noone ever picks or you don't have enough to satisfy the fanbase.
It's funny how most people keep changing their minds about the franchise games. When Battlefield 3 was released in 2011 they complained that Battlefield was ruined and that it became like Call of duty in terms of gun play and map design and that it didn't feel like the previous Battlefield games like bad company 2, BF2 (etc.). When Battlefield 4 was released it was hated due to the fact that it had countless bugs and crashes, plus the maps compared to BF3 weren't very well designed according to most players. Now that battlefield 1 launched you find the same thing happening again, now it's BF4's turn to get the praise. Wait a few more years when the next Battlefield title gets released people will complain and make the statement that BF1 was so much better and that battlefield is ruined, and how they miss the days of BF1.
John Hackr yes I know right. Like I load a game and it says "Loading Game" for honestly 5 minutes. I'm on phone watching RUclips and it still doesn't load
Declan kot okay then I guess it's something that needs to be patched. But at least it is not sonic 06 loading bad lol. Also thankfully it has been a stable Lanch overall
again i agree myself and a few mates would squad up on a friday sat night and spend 5 - 6 hours sometimes even longer!!!!. now we are lucky to play 3 maps without yawning
i blame shitty sniper favor maps, like 70% of the maps are sniperfield, only amiens and argonF, sinaiD are fun to play, soon as next map is FAO or suez i auto quite that shite, dont want to play in team who has half snipers
Ooooh rank 1-3 you can unlock telescopic sight and lense variations of the same damn gun It's one of the most shitty if not the most shitty unlock system.
Ze M16 nah I'm in love with the theme so far and know the limitations on weapons it's just the unlock system I'm talking about. I like the classic rank up to unlock. All these games use currency nowadays it gets old real fast you know
I was always confused when people talked about the destruction being actually there in BF1. I remember their being the same amount of destruction in both games. Plus in BF4 there was levolution. Why isn't there levolution in BF1?
DynamicHunter yeah. And so does battlefield 1. There is no frostbite 4. Ironically I find battlefield 4 to have better looking purely because in battlefield 4 you had MSAA which actually fucking did cancel out aliasing while keeping the game looking sharp while In battlefield one you either choose between mass aliasing everywhere on every object or blurring the shit out of your game into oblivion.( fuck TXAA)
Battlefield 4 is just a more full and complete experience. Better server rental options with procon/arcon, more game modes, naval combat, you don't need to ever rely on matchmaking for any mode, more player freedom, stunts, progression and customization, platoons, you can actually hear when someone is sneaking up behind you, better weapon balance (with the exception of spammy gadgets like stingers). Battlefield 1 was no doubt a financial success, but its got a loooooong way to go before it holds longevity. PC player count dropped from 250k players to less than 80k in a few weeks after launch.
ROSENROT the two games felt like different developers made the two. BF4 felt like BF3 and earlier ones. BF1 felt like Battlefront. Something about BF1 was not right for me, I hate Bf1. Hopefully the next title will play more like the older Battlefields.
Meh the game fucks you over way more times than you ever get killed fairly, ruins any sense of fun i might have, at least in bf4 there was nearly always some option for you to come out on top in a situation, now you're just fucked cos DICE says so.
Not a huge fan of server rental because of badmins and idk what's wrong with matchmaking. It decreases the chance of baserape. I feel like i'm one of the few that likes the server system in bf1 better than older bf games. I do agree that bf4 had more content and in a lot of cases was more fun than bf4.
Adam Fields it's because bf1 its a run and gun, remember in bf4 where you couldn't just run up to someone and win the gun fight you actually had to be careful of situations, in bf1 its kind of a kill die repeat like cod where as in bf4 if you were good you could stay alive, in bf1 it's just not possible
Yousif Osama not really. Bf3 had a subtly that wasn't present in bf4; just compare Operation Firestorm in bf3 to its remaster in bf4; bf3 was a normal map, but in bf4 it had explosives all over the map in fire almost everywhere.
fragr33f no, the strategy it takes is just get in a hot spot, and wait for them to come to you. They're usually stupid enough to charge into the same spot to kill you.
BF3 will always be my favorite. I remember switching from MW3 and being amazed by the destruction and size of the maps. Oh and the AS VAL with 30 round mag.
Ahmed David you are wrong sir it is a beautiful name full of explosions and makes me feel like I'm in a movie that Michael Bay wrote directed and produced
the devils advocate Well, I didn't feel that way playing it.. I'm still playing BF4 and 3 and enjoy every single match while it took me a couple weeks only to get bored of BF1
I can feel your heart beating Cus its time to die the teamwork just because of the majority of players from Bf3 are veterans from the series so that's why, after Bf3 a lot of new people started jumping into Bf4
well to get camos in bf4 was through battlepacks which you are calling supply drops, but they were much more frequent and you could get ones for specific weapons
BF1 maps are not good in my opinion. I only like Amiens, Ballroom Blitz and St. Quentin Scar. The rest is meh. In BF4 I only dislike Paracel Storm and Golmud Railway. But hey, just my opinion
Well, for me, BF4 maps were too wide open. If you liked vehicle warfare, that was good for you but if not, that was not really a nice experience. The only infantry-sided map was Operation Locker, which was a meatgrinder like Metro in BF3 and eventually Flood Zone where choppers dominated still. If you look back at BF3, every map (except Metro, which didn't have vehicles) was balanced with infantry and vehicles. Even maps like Caspian Border and Operation Firestorm were playable with infantry easily. Oh, and in BF4, Rush was dead because of terrible game design and map design. Even after DICE LA had changed the location of almost every M-COM, it was not a game mode really enjoyable imo while it was my favorite game mode in BFBC2 and BF3.
I totally disagree.Bf1 has better maps than bf4.Also,bf4 has plenty of vehicles as it is modern combat.Bf1 vehicles are from 1918(ww1).Bf1 has a perfect atmosphere,a normal reward system(bf4's sucks) and it has much much better graphics and physics.
@@geotzz3815 I mean battlefield 1 came out on ps4 Xbox one only and not past gen unlike bf4 which the dude stated had 360 and ps3 limitations so that’s not even a good argument as to “bf1 has better graphics” if bf4 and 1 released the same year you’d be looking at possibly the best looking battlefield game to date in bf4 if it had the same graphical opportunity that bf1 had and battlefield 4 holds up well to this fucking day for a game that released in 2013 lmao
@@flightkidd123 Well, I couldn't agree more with you. Bf4 was actually a really developed game for 2013 but what I'm trying to say is that now in 2020 i prefer to play bf1 for all those reasons i have already stated.
second that!. Todays youth have the attention span of mosquitoes. They are used to an endless supply of distractions, and cant sit still long enough to appreciate a good game when they see it. Its really sad, if dice listen to them, the battlefield franchise will eventually end up like a facebook feed, endlessly distracting, totally devoid of content.
Battlefield 4 was far more varied. Battlefield 1 is a lot more fun albeit with less variety. If DICE add more options and variety AND fix the reward system it can become a legendary game and a new benchmark for the genre.
VancouverCanucksRock i know the bullet velocity on bf1 is insane i whiped out my sniper and was expecting tones of bullet drop but nope fuck all no skill is needed to snipe in bf1 just put your sight on some one and shoot then bam a kill but bf4 you had to spot a guy and line the shot up
It should have learned from the previous game there was no need to go this far backwards gameplay and progression wise. All the years refining bf4 seemed wasted when it comes to the launch if bf1
exactly, no bullshit pickups that gives you free kills, every battle pickup in battlefield 4 is only deadly when you know how to use it and how good you are at the game. even though battlefield 4 have bullshit gadgets but i think they way battlefield 4 played out was better than battlefield 1.
Honestly I went back to BF4... BF1s gun selection is SOO dull and the game is not as challenging as 4 was... Even BF1s sniping is easier. It's just a fuller game besides the beautiful graphics and great mechanics... BF1 just can't hold me like a modern game shooter. Bring BACK MODERN DICE! Not like Hardline though... That game was the worst
Mike Seeds I agree... I guess that's why heavy competitive Battlefield fans aren't feeling BF1 as much. I mean it's a good game i just don't find myself playing match after match like I did in BF4
***** I don't think they did lol taking away certain customization elements alone shows they didn't make similarities to CoD regarding dumbing things down. The spread based model is far more skill based than CoD as well eventbeat.org/the-spread-model-is-amazing-and-skill-based-battlefield-1/
I think your memory may be hazy, oh wait that's probably the BF3 suppression that was like gobs of vaseline on your player's face. Also blue tint everything. Joking aside, BF4 was garbage at launch. Personally I think DICE LA brought it over the level of BF3 over time, though.
The only problem I have with BF1 is the weapons. Three variations of the same weapon is kind of pointless. Why not have more guns with customization options? For instance MP 18 Trench, MP 18 Experimental, MP 18 Optical. I don't get why they did it like that.
Because the trench has better hip fire for rapidly clearing trenches out.. The optical is more for midrange and the experimental.. Idk I haven't used too many experimental weps
I think bf4 is better because in tdm you could play to 400 and not 100 max the games are so short and I don't like big maps. There is not that many weapons and the media weapon is terrible. Bf1 on pc runs like shit I have a 1070 and I can't even play stable on low. I drop to 40 fps sometimes. On bf4 on ultra I get a minimum of 80 since I use the i5 4460 so it's bottlenecking. To make bf1 better it would need a lot more optimization and better performance.
I think bf4 is better because in tdm you could play to 400 and not 100 max the games are so short and I don't like big maps. There is not that many weapons and the media weapon is terrible. Bf1 on pc runs like shit I have a 1070 and I can't even play stable on low. I drop to 40 fps sometimes. On bf4 on ultra I get a minimum of 80 since I use the i5 4460 so it's bottlenecking. To make bf1 better it would need a lot more optimization and better performance.
Darrius Poitier WW2 had more mobile, fast paced combat. There were more countries involved, vehicles like tanks and aircraft were widespread and actually did most of the fighting, and ww2 had more variety with the weapons, you had smg's, lmg's bolt action rifles' early assault rifles, semi automatic rifles. And the geopolitics of the war were far more interesting. WW2 is just better for a battlefield game
Not a reskin, try play both games for one hour you'll see how much a bigger difference there is between them. You can't just call them a reskin, it's stupid.
how did it die? there are still loads of players on that game all the time. Always takes less than 5-10 seconds to find a game, regardless of game mode (apart from some really shit ones)
8 лет назад+16
Similarity is a norm, base on your logic I could say that BF4 is just a reskined version of BF3, but no it isn't. Its really depressed how gamers these day judge a game based on it visual similarities to another game. To be clear BF1 was developed by DICE LA and SWBF was developed by DICE Stockholm you nerd.
I loved BF4, sunk 300+ hours into on PS4, and maybe less than a day on PS3 (before I upgraded). It's just funny as hell that all these comments are praising the game now when they hated it back in 2013! Like are you fake or naw? Idk people are just funny, the typical cycle of new games vs old games.
Dom Anthony Jesus Couldn't agree more. It blows my mind that people feel the need to be "cool" and hate the brand new thing that everyone is enjoying and then say that the "old one was so much better."
A-Town 92501 it seems to happen with every Triple A title out there. But what gets me confused about the people raving BF4 is better with way more content is that the game has been out for 3 years. As LevelCap said in the beginning it still had more content on release, but may I remind people that all the snipers were pretty much just reskins? Stats were all pretty much the same and there was very little varying differences. Or how it's basically a clone of BF3. Again I love the game and have more than 15 days played on PS4 and I'm like level 110 so it's not like I'm some level 10 noob. It's just the game wasn't this shinning gem, to me Bf1 wins because it's something different. It really immerses you into the WW1 feel, play operations and goddamn
Dom Anthony Jesus Besides the total crap rewards and leveling system and the grand total of 5 guns in the game, BF1 is a vastly superior game to BF4. Although I do miss my helis very much...
A-Town 92501 I agree lack of weapons and nerfing of level 10 weapons really sucks. The reward systems are so stupid, never been a big fan of medals but it happened so naturally in BF4.
manav bhalla I honestly hated the Jets. dogfights were so boring because you would constantly be going in circles for minutes upon minutes trying to catch the other guy
True, now all you have to do it get an attack plane and not shoot near the enemy and they die where in Bf4 you get a little bird and you have to directly hit them
Bf1 is my savior for many reasons, so I'll list the main ones. 1. No more modern or futuristic bullshit. I got tired of modern games after bf3 and hardline wasn't a refresher. I hoped for ww2 but I love the ww1 setting just as much. I don't get why anyone would still want another modern shooter after 4 modern battlefields in a role. 2. The action. Oh the action. I'm a console player so having 32 players on each team is new for me. I never go more than 30 seconds without engaging in combat. The problem with previous battlefields I see now is that with 12 players max on each team, big conquest matches were almost all like stealthy games. Whenever I fought the enemy, it was almost always another single troop. But in bf1 I see huge battles going on with multiple players all fighting in the same areas all over the maps. Now I can't play other battlefields on consoles as much because they rarely have those epic battle moments. Bf1 feels like WAR. 3. Finally I love the fact that there isn't much customization because it makes me feel like a soldier, not a Rambo commander. Seeing people run around with crazy setups ruins the feeling of WAR for me. For example, yesterday I went back to playing my beloved bf3 after six months of not playing, but I didn't get that WAR feeling I got in bf1. It felt like I was in a call of duty free for all, and we all know that COD isn't a war game. Overall bf1 is a WAR game, not another cod ripoff with vehicles added in to make it look like battlefield.
Jake vxj Its because of their developer DICE and their new outlook on their franchise Battlefield ever since they rebooted Battlefront and Anita Sarrkesian (I know that's not how you spell her last name but it's close)
Main thing people prefer BF4 over BF1 cause BF4 had 3 years to develop it's only been three months with BF1, il just put my trust in DICE to improve the game, just like their did with BF4.
They're pretty bad beyond ten-twenty meters, and they turn into 6+ shot kills very quickly. If you're a medic, support, or recon, and you find assaults annoying, you're probably not playing your class properly.
BF4 is easily the better of the two, but BF1 is still great. Levolution was fun. I liked how it could vastly change how a flag was played. Shanghai was the only one that kinda sucked. And just like with BC2 the reason there is more destruction is because the buildings are dinky little 2 to 3 story houses. There's almost no building destruction with the city map, and others. BF1 needs more iron sights. It's really annoying finding a gun you like, but it's whopping 2 iron sight options are pure trash. Who decided it was good to lock optical's to specific guns? Was it to make there appear to be more guns in the game? And considering how many guns were in use during WWI the selection in BF 1 is pathetic. Being able to repair your vehicle while inside needs to never be in a BF again. Taking your class away if you get into an offensive ground vehicle is also retarded. I jump in a tank then escape before it's destroyed, so now i'm forced to use a shitty gun I'm not familiar with. I went into the tank with my gun, where'ed it go? This idea is great for air vehicles, though. Random weather is cool, but fog needs to go away. Fog looks great, but creates a terrible environment to play in. Some particle effects seem to be overdone too. There is enough smoke and shit created by players, we don't need the map creating more shit to obscure the view to a target. I feel giants shadow is the worst with this, and also one of the worst BF maps I've ever played.
BF1 in my opinion is kinda boring, healing vehicles like tanks from the inside is like a littlebird team the thing's almost unkillable without a direct team attacking it, class changes are horrible Assault is Engineer, Support is just ammo, Recons are pure anti-teamplay, and medic is just a generic assault without the grenade launcher. The maps in my opinion not at all good, feels like hardline too enclosed Map effects are bad/not needed, the point of the fog is to stop snipers it seem Guns are variations of others. Environment destruction is good Turrets are actually useful/useable Forcing you to use a crap weapon after going in a vehicle discourages me from going in vehicles, or I might as well go down with it because i'm not used to the weapon so i'm gonna die regardless in some circumstances. Only one tank busting class, discourages people from using other classes But on a positive note making people play medic more because it's a auto full heal, and 100 points was good But not adding hardline's ability to just take the ammo, or med kit off someone was not good
I agree for now but when you must think about it, Battlefield 4 only became a better game after a year and battlefield 1 is only 3 months in and it's kinda unfair right now. However the point of vehicle classes is to encourage players to be dedicated to the vehicle they are using. It's completely fair and reduces the amount of people who uses vehicles as taxis.
Warfan2001 They fixed BF4 and made it what it was supposed to be. BF1 is already what it is supposed to be. Nobody uses a tank or canon truck (whatever it's called) as taxis, and I said i'm fine with that feature for planes.
The main reason as to why BF4 is currently better than BF1 is the development teams. DICE Stockholm always destroys game balance and leaves the game in a bad state until DICE LA comes in and fixes it. That's what needs to happen with BF1. Stockholm can make the expansions and the maps but leave game balance and other quality of life patches to DICE LA. DICE LA turned BF4 into one of the best games in the entire franchise
Ninja4editS Constant grenade spam,support class sucks,m1903 variants are awful,every level 10 weapon needs a buff,spawn killing is worse than its ever been before,the assault class needs something better to deal with tanks. seriously, I should be able to strap dynamite to a bike and blow up a tank.
Grenade spam was a thing in real life WW1. No change needed here. Support class is great if you use it in the right way. Its not supposed to be a close-range class like most think. Its supposed to SUPPORT. Suppressing, giving ammo to teammates, blowing out walls etc. Use it in the right way and its just as good as all other classes :) Agree that lvl 10 weapons need some balancing, yeah. Hellriegel is fine, but the rest of them could use some tweaking. Not gamebreaking tho. The assault class should not be used to deal with tanks? What are you talking about? Classes are supposed to be used for different objectives. Taking down tanks is not something an Assault player should do. Most of the stuff you pointed out is only your own opinion. Nothing that most agree on other than the grenade spam which Dice is problaby not going to adress, and the lvl 10 weapons which pretty much everyone agrees on.
bf1 is so casual its not even funny, ive had it since the end of october and im still level 12 due to the fact that the game is boring af. I spend most of my game time in the loading screen, followed by either a game on the verge of finishing, or a black bugged screen. IT PISSES ME OFF SO FUCKING MUCH! the weapon balancing is awful, there are 2 main classes to go for, the medic and the sniper as they are IMO the most dominant classes with the best weapons, you can practically quick scope people on bf1 due to the fact that it is so easy to snipe on it, the medic weapons can just 3 tap at any range also. And wtf is with the "hold a to skip" option, its literally the dumbest thing in the game, medic runs toward someone to revive them to only be dissapointed that the player just fucking respawned. fuck this game BF3, BF4 were so much better than this waffle of a game.
BF3 and BF4 was nothing but Vehicle domination. You were forced to use Engineer class every match because of how Overpowered they are. Also, the Assault Class was very good in BF1. I use it to take out Planes and tanks.
MrCatsEyes if you were on consoles PS3/PS4 like me ...... 🏆Battlefield 4 (My first 64 player experience) 👍Battlefield 3 👌🏾battlefield 1 🤔😒hardline was meh and it still is, never got the new maps but the game just doesn't fit the theme of battlefield.
Paddlez-is-king no you're right everyone was all "bf4 is the shittiest bf besides the one we don't speak of" and now they're saying "BF1 is the shittiest bf PERIOD"
Berry McCockinner i agree completely. Thats what I thought, too, but I think we are pretty alone with this opinion. Maybe because I just missed historical fps games. I just love the ww area from a historical point of view.
Or make a new one. Jk Dice is just a shell of it's former self drained of their creative capabilities by the corporate greed and blatant disregard for the customer that EA continously dislplays. They'd just fuck it up if they tried.
Personally i prefer the aesthetics of BF1 but the game play of BF4. even though BF1 started on a better foot I prefer the faster time to kill. also on a slightly separate note if dice/ea continue to do more vintage settings for their battlefield games I'd love to see one set in the Korean War, cuz I don't think a single game has ever done it before, same with WWI until now. or maybe even a Vietnam setting. I know they already did that in bad company 2 (?) with the update/dlc/thing but idk it'd be nice to see something more flushed out, maybe see like the grittier side of that war. but that's not gonna be for another like 3 years so you know
You had a stand alone called Battlefield Vietnam, it came out after BF1942 some time, so BC2 was not the first in that. I just wish they didnt make the game so noob friendly, but when the devs are casual/noobs, then what other to expect, back in the older days, games were harder to master, sadly those times are gone.
I Have Both, And In My Opinion BF4 Is Better. I Bought BF1 For No Reason. I Still Play BF4. They're Still Both Good Games. BF3 Is Also Another Good Game. I Have A Collection Of The Battlefield Franchise.
Funny how one man's trash is another man's treasure. I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players. Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested? What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
you are so right sir. BF1 is a step in the right direction. BF is FPS on a massive scale, with high end war equipment like tanks and airplanes. That should therefore be its main focus. Diluting it, and obstructing it with the "clusterfuck of unlocks" like in bf4 is just bad. People in it for the progress should rather pick up a RPG in stead, and let the big boys play the game, as it was meant to be played.
I like battlefield 1 but I like having variety in weapons having 4 guns with different attachments doesn't count as a new weapons and there were plenty of weapons for them to choose from to put in game and I prefer unlocking attachments by getting a certain amount of kills rather than just buying it
I liked how in BF4, we could look around while in steering some vehicles, while using the motion feature in the PS4 controller. It allowed for flexibility. I am disappointed that it isn't implemented in BF1. But Bf1 is dope for Sprinting and pressing the crouch button.
i like BF1 better because i am a history buff. The game will give you facts about World War I while you wait for a multilplayer matches which i find awesome. Not to mention this is the first WWI game to be made.
Battlefield 4 will forever keep it's place in my heart as the best Battlefield title. It has more variety in gameplay than any battlefield I have played in a while and honestly, after four or so years of playing it with friends and family, I still find new things to do and crazy fun to be had. While yes, I do have fun playing Battlefield 1 with my friends I just find it to be more tamed and realistic, self serious so to say. For example, just this weekend in BF4 me and my friend drove a car into an elevator and glitched it onto a roof, driving it around and massacring every enemy that came up the elevator; while in battlefield 1 I found me and my friends just driving planes into eachother or driving boats out of combat zone and killing everyone. While still fun and ultimately hilarious, Battlefield 4 just keeps that "Only in battlefield" quality that I have come to expect from a DICE game. Battlefield 4 will forever be my favorite video game and, for the sake of pure gameplay, the best Battlefield title since Bad Company 2.
You do realize that in ww1 they actually had a lot of weapons right? It's just that bf1 gets them completely wrong because other than machine guns, there were very few automatic weapons....they were mostly bolt action rifles
Lmao when you say primitive you make it sound like they were fighting with sticks and stones foh ww1 had a shit Ton of weapons and idgaf if most were bolt action they still were different guns from different factions fuck you
i consistently have more fun in bf1 than i ever did in bf4, way more epic moments. I found bf4 had many frustrating features like getting sniped from across the map with 40x scopes, automatic weapons everywhere, SUAV and attack chopper whores. Does it lack guns and a good progression system? yes. is that enough to make me go back to bf4? no. wait for a few patches, dlcs. things will get better.
BF1 pros and cons compared to BF4: Pros: Much better map design/level layouts More destruction, which is well balanced, helped by the better map design Better graphics(of course) Much better optimization and from launch at the same time. Better launch. IMO better campaign, but both meh Cons: Less weapons(variations don't count) OP Vehicles granade spam is back Recoil is none-existing Spread is huge and Dice have chosen bullet spread(randomness) over Recoil(skill), just sad Neutral: Even though it's theme is WW1 it plays out like BF4 without ARs and helicopters, but with much stronger vehicles and much better maps. All and all, both games are epic and I like then equally, but I think I slightly prefer BF1 over BF4.
Pablo Horteg indeed, but I played in servers that had them forbidden and most infantry servers were like that, they were NOT a big problem or at all in vehicle game modes.
I can put up with grenade spam but goddamn, the gas is horrible. People spam gas and shotgun/smg everywhere. Half the time, I'm wearing a gasmask. I'm not even sure how you can balance something like gas spamming.
I don't know why people are protecting this game unlike hardline hardline honestly was more fun than bf1 with its slow progression system sure bfh didn't have much content at launch but it was fun sometimes and it kinda had weapon variety? also bf1 kinda got rid of skill when you compare it to bf4 I mean don't get me wrong bf1 can be fun I think this battlefield has more devolution than any previous battlefield titles but its only fun for like 1 game after that you just get sick of it at least that's my experience
I love bf4: I Played it over 800h because of how you were able to customize your class. In bf1 everyone uses the sniper, in bf4 you needed a lot of skill to use recon and now someone as me that was good at it can't play bf1. Also, a lot of people use the Bar in support. It is very strong and you can die with few shots.
I have 100 hours in BF1 and it's boring as hell now. Same thing over and over. No teamwork, games always play the same way, it's just too repetitive for a BF game. There's not enough variety to keep things interesting. Been playing Overwatch again, and getting bored of that now too. Kinda the same thing. Lots of heroes, but everyone always picks the same most of the time, and there's really only a couple game modes lol. How many times can you do an escort the payload on rails? Might go back to playing Siege again. There's a ton of variety between matches in that game.
Vi7aLi7Y I got bored of Overwatch and Battlefield 1 for the exact same reasons you did. In BF1 I climbed all the way to the top on 3 out of the 4 Classes and let me tell you: It is underwhelming as hell. As Rank 10 Medic I get a shitty FIVE SHOT PIECE OF SHIT THAT ONLY GETS IRON SIGHTS?!?! As Scout Rank 10 I get a 1-SHOT SHITTY RIFLE WITH ONLY IRON SIGHTS?!!? As Rank 10 Assault I get the most broken gun I have ever seen in any Battlefield game. Great. Can't wait for everyone to hate me when I kill them (ultimate sarcasm). I see the Hellriegel as the Dark Side of the Assault Class. It's powerful, overwhelming and all around annoying. I got bored, stopped playing and ended up buying Battlefield 4 for the PS4 (with Premium). I had Battlefield 4 on the PS3 and was amazing at it. I advanced to Level 100+ easy and consistently got in the top 5 of my Team in any Mode. I can't wait to get back there again. And Overwatch is fun, but it REALLY needs more Content ASAP. A new Map (Oasis) is not nearly enough for me to want to come back. It needs a big DLC or massive new Content Drop. Something like 5+ new Characters , 3 new Game Modes and 4 new Maps. That would bringe back for sure. But seeing as that looks like it isn't going to happen, Overwatch is just as barren as a Desert for me. (see what I did with the Oasis-Desert thing? ;D)
vampireguy24 yeah, i feel you. I been gaming less and less really. Everything is stale. Rarely do I play a new game more than 3 hours and never touch it again, if that. I been back playing Siege. At least the rounds are different enough and not the exact same thing over and over. Plus they've added a lot and continue to add a lot to it.
I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players. Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested? What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
This maybe controversial, but now playing battlefield 4 compared to battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is just a superior game as it relates to the feel of immersion and the gunplay. Guns in battlefield 4 feel like BB guns compared to battlefield 1. When you kill someone in battlefield 1 it just feels a lot more satisfying.
I biggest thing I hate about BF1 is the lack of customization and weapons. For the assault class for example, you only get 5 guns. And they basally use different variety of guns (trench, optical) as fillers. There no attachments for guns and you get very little choices for customizing.
They certainly had a good selection of weapons, and seeing how DICE is taking creative liberties by using weapons such as the Hellriegel there SHOULD be more weapon variety.
EinoKeino xD The only thing we can customize are the visuals, scope, and scope magnification. That's it. Instead of adding the variety of weapons like experimental, optical, marksman, they should give us the freedom to customize the guns how we want.
Funny how one man's trash is another man's treasure. I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players. Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested? What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
BF1 is my first Battlefield as I was always a COD guy. All I can say is the learning curve is steep. TTK is insanely fast, but the game doesn't really become frustrating. Thus far I'm really happy with it.
Battlefield 1 is head and shoulders better than Battlefield 4 IMO, Battlefield 4 brought me into the franchise but battlefield 1 made me into a fan, it's so much better, more fun, games aren't dominated by experienced players, it's honestly the best fps I've ever played
CarreraGT theres nothing to do after level 20, in other shooter liked titanfall u can go for all camos, all titan upgrades etc, even in cod you have more reason to play after level 20, the game has such little content, in bf4 you had SOOOOOOOOOOOO Much more to do
CarreraGT so your only point is games aren't dominated by experienced players? that literally just comes down to who's playing. I really don't understand how you can try and voice your point without giving anything lol
CarreraGT Bro experienced players are supposed to be good it says it in the name this game kinda ruined it for me. After a week I got to lvl 23 and I got so bored I went back to BF4 trying to unlock the last guns because even though I've played the shit out of BF4 I still have stuff to unlock and actually a purpose to play it. Fuck battlefield 1
I love how nobody talks about Hardline😂
Rebel 42356 bf4 dlc
klaus os ikr
Everyone wants to forget Hardline.
Rebel 42356 hardline ia a sub game it is and will always be small and uncaredfore
Rebel 42356 you dont speak about that game.
Battlefield 1 please listen when I say this. The same gun 4 different times is not 4 guns.
exactly
Yes.
Dude I totally agree. We need more weapon variation.
It's world war 1 ....... uhhhhhhh
I wish they would scrap the variant system and give you the customization on par with bf4, making the guns more distinctive
BF4 launch: manys bugs and glitches
BF1 launch: basically no content
True, unlocked every weapon in the game game in the first week. (Except lvl 10 guns)
Stop talking shit. You were still missing 10 weapons then. 2 from each class and the vehicle class weapons.
Falquiboy How is he talking shit?There's not enough content in Battlefield 1,that's undeniable
Because he was saying that he had unlocked every gun in the gam which is wrong because he was/is still missing 10 weapons. Thats what takes the most time. He wanted to state that he had everything after a week which is absolutely nonsense
True, unlocked every weapon in the game in the first week. Said it in a polite way? And no i was missing 3 not 10. (Each class has one special lvl 10 gun and i had the hellreigel and the martini henry)
I like BF4 way better. Buts that's prone to happen due to more customization/options to make your soldier unique and role play more.
Dallasmed65 o m g
Who the fuck role plays in bf1 go play some roblox
It sounds like you're more of the COD type
klutz395 I actually hate COD... Battlefield is blessed... I don’t know what he means by role playing tho? I think there should be more recoil based attachments like a fore grip but it’s WW1 shouldn’t be laser sights or holo sights
aaron stelmach I'm talking to OP, but I get your point. Customization is cool and all, but I'd much rather have fun, authentic gameplay than play dress-up with guns. BC2 and BF2 didn't have extensive gun customization, and no one cared. Games only started to have gun customization after COD4 came out.
Give BF1 some more time it's still early AF
Dr. Kush yep
Dr. Kush NO
"Opinion", BF1 is still a child at the moment and BF4 has been and still in 3 years of support. Give BF1 a chance, if you didn't enjoy the game, it doesn't make the same more suck than BF4 and reverse.
Timotheus Kazlav BF4 was broken at launch and it's taken dice 3 years to sort things out and it's still has problems. At least BF1 wasn't a major POS at launch.
Dr. Kush they would have to redo the entire game and it's engine to get it anywhere near bf4
BF4 = 2,500 hrs and i still haven't unlocked EVERYTHING for the weapons.
BF1 = 150 hrs, unlocked everything...fucking bored...more content please.
I had fun, till i unlocked everything, in about 150 hours. I have used and reused all the weapons numerous times. BF4 had more weapons/gadgets/vehicles which kept me interested and entertained. BF1 literally has fuck all content. The new battlepacks are cancer (like you) and simply having one weapon and making "different variants" is fucking pathetic. More weapons plz.
Forced to do this shite Hate u google Yes the battle packs are legit cancer. And yes, weapon variants are padding. But the sentiment behind it that you display is the sentiment of an entitled and expecting of superfluous crap, jackass. Players shouldn't need their games to have all this extra stuff for it to qualify in their eyes.
It's almost as if people want and enjoy different things from their games than you, and apparently anyone that doesn't think exactly as you do is an entitled dumbfuck. The past 3 games have had an abundance of this "superfluous crap", so obviously people are going to expect more than the small amount of content in this game and they definitely are entitled to it considering they're the ones paying for it.
That "superfluous crap" played a big part in keeping people interested/entertained in the game till the next BF is released and the next Battlefield is at least 2 years away, even if BF1 releases 4 new weapons with every new DLC it will still have less weapons than bf4 did on release.
***** A lack of content has nothing to do with entitlement. EA is one of the biggest gaming companies in the world, the fact they released a game with such a piss poor amount of content when the clearly have the ability and $$$ shows they either rushed the game or potentially want to string out content extremely slowly via DLC's meaning those who did not buy premium will have to if they more than the current pitiful offering. Then there was the free map DLC which was panned by numerous RUclipsrs as an after thought, something to keep people from complaining about how little content there actually is.
They intentionally left out some of the most common weapons of ww1 (mosin Nagant) just so they could save it for DLC. That's like buying a hamburger but the bun is extra. Wtf dice
Brennan Bennett yeah I agree
Great *CONTENT*
wgaf!? Mosin-Nagant is trash compared to some of the already available rifles.
Alexandras Vulfgang Mosin Nagant could have been a very slow but rewarding weapon.
They had Australians in the campaign
Man, BF1 really didn't click at first with the Battlefield community, but now it's one of the most beloved games in the series.
That toxic People only loves previous games, wich is dumbass
@@queueshit5137 The BF community has become terrible they hate every new game until the next one comes out
@@enjoi9970 i just cant wait to see people saying that battlfield 5 was better than battlefield 2042 when it comes out.
(battlfield 5 had many flaws but it was a really fun game, i wish how they would get things right so it would'nt die so early)
@@quartermaster2809 Even if the game was actually perfect (which is not possible) people would still find a way to bash the new game.
@@enjoi9970 it’s sad but true 😭
i miss seeing all the medals i got after a round at metro
exactly theres no rewards in bf1
The Medal System is shite in BF1, only really cause I have to do the reirements in order. Fuckin stupid! Why?
VancouverCanucksRock thats what im trying to figure out bruv..how do they go from the great reward system from bf4 with all those cool ribbons to this crap??
***** Prob just to make it harder to Obtain the Medals, which is fine, but we should not have to do that shit in order. Damn goofs
VancouverCanucksRock i know they really "goofed" on this one
The two major flaws of Battlefield 1 (imo) :
- Lack of content/customization
- Crappy boring progression system
Abdelhakim Neozander sadly. this game will fix that eventually with DLC.
Abdelhakim Neozander Yeah those are the 2 major flaws I think as well
Abdelhakim Neozander 3.No Fun Guns to use. 4. No skill needed 5. sniping is way too easief
Paran01ac sorry for wanting to have fun, because getting rewarded with cool stuff IS fun :)
Abdelhakim Neozander don't forget to add grenade spam and sniping up there. Still love this game though
Remember c4 jeep, then you cant say that bf1 is funnier than bf4
lol, this comment reminded me of the time when they were teasing BF1 and everyone was excited about the possibility of dynamite horses. XD
A Vietnamese Gai Lol! The Battlefield community is great
clem72tro remember content? Then you can say bf4 isn't competitive like bf1 is. Bf1 is also extremely easy. Bf4 is actually challenging.
clem72tro remember BFFs oh good times
Noah W. New a gaming for life!!!!!!
BF4 felt so much more rewarding
daogenify true
U only have shit potato Pc
Your Friendly Neighborhood Athies No way, all the maps are the same dull boring themes. Lancang Dam, Siege, Rogue transmission (even more) are pretty memorable and unique in appearance.
W Ck
That has nothing to do with that lmao.
Before u start saying *uR pc iS shIt toO* i have a gtx 1080, i think its pretty decent
@Black Hole
Yes, watching "westie" now. When you land that sniper headshot and it says "ping" its so fucking rewarding lol.
levelcap
*complains about too many weapons in bf4*
*complains bf1 has less weapons than bf4*
ME-
"make up your mind"
Agerix Official yeah you can compare when the lunch btf 4 because we just got a new gen change... btf 1 learn from thoses mistake...
jevillo p i dont know what you are talking about, but he complained that bf4 had too many weapons. bf1 takes levelcaps advice and levelcap complains about it.
You have to strike that magical balance in number of weapons because if you don't you either have a bunch of useless guns in the game that noone ever picks or you don't have enough to satisfy the fanbase.
Roland Deschain again. he said bf4 had too many weapons and now he complains that bf1 does not have as many weapons as bf4.
Agerix Official it can never be too much weapons in a game
It's funny how most people keep changing their minds about the franchise games. When Battlefield 3 was released in 2011 they complained that Battlefield was ruined and that it became like Call of duty in terms of gun play and map design and that it didn't feel like the previous Battlefield games like bad company 2, BF2 (etc.). When Battlefield 4 was released it was hated due to the fact that it had countless bugs and crashes, plus the maps compared to BF3 weren't very well designed according to most players. Now that battlefield 1 launched you find the same thing happening again, now it's BF4's turn to get the praise. Wait a few more years when the next Battlefield title gets released people will complain and make the statement that BF1 was so much better and that battlefield is ruined, and how they miss the days of BF1.
exactly I've noticed that too
But I still remember the glory of BF2/2142, those moments can never be recreated in these codkiddiefields.
bob mama because Battlefield keeps getting worse lol
YouStubid Your nostalgia holds all of us back
Bad company 2 is still my favorite, even if it's pretty damn clunky. I still like 3 and 4 a lot.
when you have to ramble on and on to get that vid just over 10 minutes lol
FeelTheBirdie ok
FeelTheBirdie jokes on levelcap, I have Adblock
FeelTheBirdie Yeah that money still has to roll right.
FeelTheBirdie thought I was the only one who noticed
But he didn't put an extra ad in the video so it literally makes no difference if the video is under or over 10 minutes
My 2 problems with the game are the long loading times and HUD.
John Hackr yes I know right. Like I load a game and it says "Loading Game" for honestly 5 minutes. I'm on phone watching RUclips and it still doesn't load
Ian Morales okay I thought was the only one lol
Put it on a SSD, it loads in less than 30 seconds.
i have bf1 on my ssd and it does nothing for loading times
Declan kot okay then I guess it's something that needs to be patched. But at least it is not sonic 06 loading bad lol. Also thankfully it has been a stable Lanch overall
I don't know why but Battlefield was so fun to me I could play for hours but with Battlefield 1 I get bored after 3 or 4 games
I agree, but it will probably be a lot more fun once most of the DLC is out.
Yeah that should give me the boost to play
Because they made the game more casual and easier to play. Nobody wants that.
again i agree myself and a few mates would squad up on a friday sat night and spend 5 - 6 hours sometimes even longer!!!!. now we are lucky to play 3 maps without yawning
i blame shitty sniper favor maps, like 70% of the maps are sniperfield, only amiens and argonF, sinaiD are fun to play, soon as next map is FAO or suez i auto quite that shite, dont want to play in team who has half snipers
Battlefield 4: shitty launch but a great game
Battlefield 1: great launch but a boring game
"Opinion", because out there there are people who actually enjoy both game, like me.
4K Reconic
opinion>fact
Alek Wester lol
your opinion yeah.. im still enjoying battlefield 1 since the open-beta
Alek Wester true!!
bf4 you could actually UNLOCK shit not just BUY it right away
blacky_chan_77 yes you can
Ooooh rank 1-3 you can unlock telescopic sight and lense variations of the same damn gun It's one of the most shitty if not the most shitty unlock system.
Ze M16 nah I'm in love with the theme so far and know the limitations on weapons it's just the unlock system I'm talking about. I like the classic rank up to unlock. All these games use currency nowadays it gets old real fast you know
And I thought about getting titanfall just haven't got to iT yet I'm determined on getting gears of War 4 first lol
blacky_chan_77 weapons are all one sided as well
there's going to be that one person like "im more of a call of duty guy"
lmao💀
Battlefield 4 was hella fun tbh.
still the best
Uncle Paulie No, Bad Company 2.
bad company 2 is the best....
Uncle Paulie mines was 1942
zLoRd CrUeL 47 ™ BFBC2 is the best.
Wait environmental destruction is new? Dafuq I remember digging holes with C4 in Bf4 to hide in all the time.
Francis S. Stfu. Would rather have more than 4 weapons and not get bored after an hour than have some ok "environmental destruction"
***** You can do literally every single one of those things BF4, both games use Frostbite 3.
I was always confused when people talked about the destruction being actually there in BF1. I remember their being the same amount of destruction in both games. Plus in BF4 there was levolution. Why isn't there levolution in BF1?
No, battlefield 4 used frostbite 3
DynamicHunter yeah. And so does battlefield 1. There is no frostbite 4. Ironically I find battlefield 4 to have better looking purely because in battlefield 4 you had MSAA which actually fucking did cancel out aliasing while keeping the game looking sharp while In battlefield one you either choose between mass aliasing everywhere on every object or blurring the shit out of your game into oblivion.( fuck TXAA)
Battlefield 4 is just a more full and complete experience. Better server rental options with procon/arcon, more game modes, naval combat, you don't need to ever rely on matchmaking for any mode, more player freedom, stunts, progression and customization, platoons, you can actually hear when someone is sneaking up behind you, better weapon balance (with the exception of spammy gadgets like stingers).
Battlefield 1 was no doubt a financial success, but its got a loooooong way to go before it holds longevity.
PC player count dropped from 250k players to less than 80k in a few weeks after launch.
ROSENROT obviously the 3 years old game is more complete than the 3 month old game
ROSENROT the two games felt like different developers made the two. BF4 felt like BF3 and earlier ones. BF1 felt like Battlefront. Something about BF1 was not right for me, I hate Bf1. Hopefully the next title will play more like the older Battlefields.
Meh the game fucks you over way more times than you ever get killed fairly, ruins any sense of fun i might have, at least in bf4 there was nearly always some option for you to come out on top in a situation, now you're just fucked cos DICE says so.
Not a huge fan of server rental because of badmins and idk what's wrong with matchmaking. It decreases the chance of baserape. I feel like i'm one of the few that likes the server system in bf1 better than older bf games. I do agree that bf4 had more content and in a lot of cases was more fun than bf4.
ROSENROT big fan of bf3 but I absolutely love bf1. Great game. Bf4 feels cluttered and overwhelming for choices.
All the battlefield fans are hating battlefield 1. All the Cod fans are praising battlefield 1.
Adam Fields it's because bf1 its a run and gun, remember in bf4 where you couldn't just run up to someone and win the gun fight you actually had to be careful of situations, in bf1 its kind of a kill die repeat like cod where as in bf4 if you were good you could stay alive, in bf1 it's just not possible
Meh. I'd wager that CS:GO is better on that aspect.
battlefield 4 is no different, in fact I'd argue its gameplay is more run and gun than bf1.
all the the adams are at the fields.
Arctic Drone bullshit I got my bar and survived like 10 people after me your just not good in bf
Bf3 remaster please.
One Piece for Life Isn't that what BF4 is?
thank you but no thank you!
No, BF4 is a piece of shit compared to Battlefield 3
Yousif Osama No, far from it.
Yousif Osama not really. Bf3 had a subtly that wasn't present in bf4; just compare Operation Firestorm in bf3 to its remaster in bf4; bf3 was a normal map, but in bf4 it had explosives all over the map in fire almost everywhere.
I miss battlefield 3
Majestic whale same... most fun game although I did suck at it though.
Me too, i wish they would remaster it or something because id literally drop BF1 and BF4 and only play BF3!
I miss playing BF3 with my squad
bf3 is still up and running played it today.
what? sadly not on console 😢😢😭
Bring back Bad company and the more methodical gameplay. Battlefield has just become a run and gun haven.
fragr33f bad company was cod
fragr33f no, the strategy it takes is just get in a hot spot, and wait for them to come to you. They're usually stupid enough to charge into the same spot to kill you.
fragr33f I'm waiting on a Bad company 3
+sparda hellkin your stupid
2018 by DICE L.A. hopefully.
BF3 will always be my favorite. I remember switching from MW3 and being amazed by the destruction and size of the maps. Oh and the AS VAL with 30 round mag.
I love how everyone just completely ignores hardline 😂
Leafy_ its the ugly sister of the bf family
Leafy_ i think you mean forget instead of ignore
Ahmed David you are wrong sir it is a beautiful name full of explosions and makes me feel like I'm in a movie that Michael Bay wrote directed and produced
the devils advocate Well, I didn't feel that way playing it.. I'm still playing BF4 and 3 and enjoy every single match while it took me a couple weeks only to get bored of BF1
Are you a satanist?
Battlefield 4 for life,and Bad Company 2 ;)
Sgt. Manolo Battlefield 3 > Battlefield 4.
I can feel your heart beating Cus its time to die i know but in this case we are comparing Bf4 vs Bf1
I can feel your heart beating Cus its time to die Bf4 is basically Bf3 on steroids
Sgt. Manolo Map design is better in bf3, less Grenade spam, and overall better cooperative team work.
I can feel your heart beating Cus its time to die the teamwork just because of the majority of players from Bf3 are veterans from the series so that's why, after Bf3 a lot of new people started jumping into Bf4
BF4 > BF1. Better maps, better unlock system, assignments, more weapons, no supply drops to get camos, more balanced, no annoying behemoths
well to get camos in bf4 was through battlepacks which you are calling supply drops, but they were much more frequent and you could get ones for specific weapons
Oh yeah, got confused there in that point
Better maps ? What the fuck ? Yeah, the DLCs maps were good but the 10 first maps that came out at launch were bad IMO.
BF1 maps are not good in my opinion. I only like Amiens, Ballroom Blitz and St. Quentin Scar. The rest is meh. In BF4 I only dislike Paracel Storm and Golmud Railway. But hey, just my opinion
Well, for me, BF4 maps were too wide open. If you liked vehicle warfare, that was good for you but if not, that was not really a nice experience. The only infantry-sided map was Operation Locker, which was a meatgrinder like Metro in BF3 and eventually Flood Zone where choppers dominated still. If you look back at BF3, every map (except Metro, which didn't have vehicles) was balanced with infantry and vehicles. Even maps like Caspian Border and Operation Firestorm were playable with infantry easily. Oh, and in BF4, Rush was dead because of terrible game design and map design. Even after DICE LA had changed the location of almost every M-COM, it was not a game mode really enjoyable imo while it was my favorite game mode in BFBC2 and BF3.
Game for Game BF4 is a complete package.
Many different layouts, plenty of vehicles.
A better reward system.
BF1 is the Battlefront of Battlefield.
I totally disagree.Bf1 has better maps than bf4.Also,bf4 has plenty of vehicles as it is modern combat.Bf1 vehicles are from 1918(ww1).Bf1 has a perfect atmosphere,a normal reward system(bf4's sucks) and it has much much better graphics and physics.
@RayxzI think you haven't seen bf1 maps.I have exactly the opposite opinion!
I feel like the bf4 reward system is too grindy and the fact that you start with pretty bad guns is unmotivating.
@@geotzz3815 I mean battlefield 1 came out on ps4 Xbox one only and not past gen unlike bf4 which the dude stated had 360 and ps3 limitations so that’s not even a good argument as to “bf1 has better graphics” if bf4 and 1 released the same year you’d be looking at possibly the best looking battlefield game to date in bf4 if it had the same graphical opportunity that bf1 had and battlefield 4 holds up well to this fucking day for a game that released in 2013 lmao
@@flightkidd123 Well, I couldn't agree more with you. Bf4 was actually a really developed game for 2013 but what I'm trying to say is that now in 2020 i prefer to play bf1 for all those reasons i have already stated.
BF1 will be comparable once it gets all the DLC
EpicGaming exactly my thoughts
And all the free maps too ,since it will have about 4 (i hope)
EpicGaming How come? BF4 base game probably would have more than BF1+ All DLC lmao
The core game is still less, like there is 0 to go for in bf1. It sucks.
oG-DaLLaS How about you go and compare the game yourself and see. Kids these days...
Battlefield 1 brings immersion back to games, something I haven't experienced for a long time!
DanTheMan the guns are horrible though. way go 100 years backward??
Jeremy Warrick because it's really cool to see the weapons, vehicle's, and equipment used in WWI
Because they existed, why go 100 years into the future to use an AK that shoots lasers?
second that!. Todays youth have the attention span of mosquitoes. They are used to an endless supply of distractions, and cant sit still long enough to appreciate a good game when they see it. Its really sad, if dice listen to them, the battlefield franchise will eventually end up like a facebook feed, endlessly distracting, totally devoid of content.
T REX excellent points
Battlefield 4 was far more varied. Battlefield 1 is a lot more fun albeit with less variety. If DICE add more options and variety AND fix the reward system it can become a legendary game and a new benchmark for the genre.
I think we can all agree on one thing
Battlefield 1 - Pure Immersion
Battlefield 4 - Pure fun
*planes crashes into horse* P U R E immersion
@@ceoofbruh1633 Fuck you asshole
I prefer bf1 because it is immersive and fun bf4 is second best
@@gamingmoment1061 I agree bf1 has better gameplay and bf4 has better customization
@@anteplii2770 bad day?
Bf4 sniping was so satisfying but Bf1 sniping is easy as fuck
i agree if u were a beast at bf4 sniping ur a god in bf1 lmao
Cause there is little, to no bullet drop, it is a load of shite. Can't even play Hardcore where half the team isn't Snipers
VancouverCanucksRock i know the bullet velocity on bf1 is insane i whiped out my sniper and was expecting tones of bullet drop but nope fuck all no skill is needed to snipe in bf1 just put your sight on some one and shoot then bam a kill but bf4 you had to spot a guy and line the shot up
Loose Yup, it's bullshit. Look at this guys vids, esp the "I'm Done" one
Jin Ruidmongm that's because you're a nob
Give it more time guys, like you did with bf4! Love Both games btw
bruno silva same!
But I never got so bored so quickly from a battlefield game before
I'm with you, people is to fast to shit on a game
It should have learned from the previous game there was no need to go this far backwards gameplay and progression wise. All the years refining bf4 seemed wasted when it comes to the launch if bf1
bruno silva Battlefield 1 is a stupid premise why would you go 100 years backward in Warfare?
Bf4 is better just had a shitty launch
exactly, no bullshit pickups that gives you free kills, every battle pickup in battlefield 4 is only deadly when you know how to use it and how good you are at the game. even though battlefield 4 have bullshit gadgets but i think they way battlefield 4 played out was better than battlefield 1.
Uneven Melons Oo didn't enjoy BF4, didn't feel like I was actually there. BF3 and BF1 make me feel like I'm actually in the war itself.
Uneven Melons Oo agreed
By the time they fixed everything (like a YEAR LATER) I was already bored of the game unfortunately
Uneven Melons Oo agreed
this is ww1 not present day of course there wouldn't be as many weapons and vehicles
Most of them weren't in ww1,ww1 had even less weapons than that.
Honestly I went back to BF4... BF1s gun selection is SOO dull and the game is not as challenging as 4 was... Even BF1s sniping is easier. It's just a fuller game besides the beautiful graphics and great mechanics... BF1 just can't hold me like a modern game shooter. Bring BACK MODERN DICE! Not like Hardline though... That game was the worst
SirDancealot29 its the gun mechanics. no skill needed in BF1.
Mike Seeds I agree... I guess that's why heavy competitive Battlefield fans aren't feeling BF1 as much. I mean it's a good game i just don't find myself playing match after match like I did in BF4
Mike Seeds Not true at all lol bf1's spread based model is more skill based than bf4
Cole Warden i just feel BF1 is not as competitive as BF4... it feels like they dumbed down some things for the COD crowd
***** I don't think they did lol taking away certain customization elements alone shows they didn't make similarities to CoD regarding dumbing things down. The spread based model is far more skill based than CoD as well eventbeat.org/the-spread-model-is-amazing-and-skill-based-battlefield-1/
BF3 was still better then both of those games.
Володимир Когут That's probably the nostalgia talking, but is it just me or did that game look better visually than both?
Ryan Dixon I really enjoyed the visuals of that game. Especially at the time
+Ryan Dixon No it`s not better looking IMO, but the game is definitely better.
Володимир Когут lol
I think your memory may be hazy, oh wait that's probably the BF3 suppression that was like gobs of vaseline on your player's face.
Also blue tint everything.
Joking aside, BF4 was garbage at launch. Personally I think DICE LA brought it over the level of BF3 over time, though.
Does bf4 still have a strong player base?
Kaleb Cat it does
Kaleb Cat got full servers every time I play
Kaleb Cat no because its boring
The player base lost more than half of its players. I came back to Siege after a week
yup on every platform here`s the player count on every platform bf4stats.com/
The only problem I have with BF1 is the weapons. Three variations of the same weapon is kind of pointless. Why not have more guns with customization options? For instance MP 18 Trench, MP 18 Experimental, MP 18 Optical. I don't get why they did it like that.
Aicha Rezzouguy and its lame af just make modenr game whit 1000 guns and 99999999 modifications
@@ryhanen7819 the soldiers had no options to modify their guns in WW1... Bruhhh
Because the trench has better hip fire for rapidly clearing trenches out.. The optical is more for midrange and the experimental.. Idk I haven't used too many experimental weps
To be honest I like battlefield 4 10x more than battlefield 1. Sadly I bought and can't get a refund because I played it 10 hours...
I think bf4 is better because in tdm you could play to 400 and not 100 max the games are so short and I don't like big maps. There is not that many weapons and the media weapon is terrible. Bf1 on pc runs like shit I have a 1070 and I can't even play stable on low. I drop to 40 fps sometimes. On bf4 on ultra I get a minimum of 80 since I use the i5 4460 so it's bottlenecking.
To make bf1 better it would need a lot more optimization and better performance.
I think bf4 is better because in tdm you could play to 400 and not 100 max the games are so short and I don't like big maps. There is not that many weapons and the media weapon is terrible. Bf1 on pc runs like shit I have a 1070 and I can't even play stable on low. I drop to 40 fps sometimes. On bf4 on ultra I get a minimum of 80 since I use the i5 4460 so it's bottlenecking.
To make bf1 better it would need a lot more optimization and better performance.
Sebastian Donvild agreed... in my case, the beta was enough to not buy it.
jevillo p I couldn't play it at that time since we didn't have Internet...
I got the copy for free from a friend even though I only play it sometimes because he won it and gave it to me but BF4 I play much more
I love both, but BF4 will ALWAYS be my favorite FPS!
Reasons Why I Love BF4:
Operation Locker
More Operation Locker
Even More Operation Locker
Gaming UltraViolet dat c flag slaughter though
Fernando Salcedo yeah so true I got 180,000 points by just putting down medkits and ammo boxes and had 5 kills and I was on the winning team
reason why i love BF4:
Operation Metro
More Operation Metro
Even More Operation metro
Maybe with the new dlc they will add a map like that
Gaming UltraViolet Same
Battlefield 1 is best it's mostly because im into old school weapons.
Sams here
It should be WW2
William Garcia maybe the next battlefield will be Battlefield 1944
no ww1 was more interesting than ww2(my opinion)
+Darrius Poitier Oh hey... we took another trench...
Darrius Poitier WW2 had more mobile, fast paced combat. There were more countries involved, vehicles like tanks and aircraft were widespread and actually did most of the fighting, and ww2 had more variety with the weapons, you had smg's, lmg's bolt action rifles' early assault rifles, semi automatic rifles. And the geopolitics of the war were far more interesting. WW2 is just better for a battlefield game
BasePuma4007 I agree
Bf4 is soooooo much better than bf1. Bf1 should be compared to hardline
La Esco Blanca Lol even Hardline has more weapon variety than BF1. They're not even comparable.😂
yeah cus weapon variety is all that matters in a large scale battle with multiple vehicles and destructible environments and still having a skill gap
Stealthygunner X BFF is based. on ww1 their want as many guns back then as their is now
La Esco Blanca don't forget Bf1 hasn't even released its first dlc yet.
La Esco Blanca bf1 was only out for 3 months while bf4 was out for 3 years. bf1 needs more time to develop.
Bf1 is a reskinned Battlefront. Look how quickly that game died. I really hope this isn't EA's new model.
Not a reskin, try play both games for one hour you'll see how much a bigger difference there is between them. You can't just call them a reskin, it's stupid.
how did it die? there are still loads of players on that game all the time. Always takes less than 5-10 seconds to find a game, regardless of game mode (apart from some really shit ones)
Similarity is a norm, base on your logic I could say that BF4 is just a reskined version of BF3, but no it isn't. Its really depressed how gamers these day judge a game based on it visual similarities to another game. To be clear BF1 was developed by DICE LA and SWBF was developed by DICE Stockholm you nerd.
uh no.
Steve Ozone dont think you know what reskin means
*Guy in the back: "What about Hardline?!"
*Everyone: "WE DON'T TALK ABOUT HARDLINE!"
I loved BF4, sunk 300+ hours into on PS4, and maybe less than a day on PS3 (before I upgraded). It's just funny as hell that all these comments are praising the game now when they hated it back in 2013! Like are you fake or naw? Idk people are just funny, the typical cycle of new games vs old games.
Dom Anthony Jesus Couldn't agree more. It blows my mind that people feel the need to be "cool" and hate the brand new thing that everyone is enjoying and then say that the "old one was so much better."
A-Town 92501 it seems to happen with every Triple A title out there. But what gets me confused about the people raving BF4 is better with way more content is that the game has been out for 3 years. As LevelCap said in the beginning it still had more content on release, but may I remind people that all the snipers were pretty much just reskins? Stats were all pretty much the same and there was very little varying differences. Or how it's basically a clone of BF3. Again I love the game and have more than 15 days played on PS4 and I'm like level 110 so it's not like I'm some level 10 noob. It's just the game wasn't this shinning gem, to me Bf1 wins because it's something different. It really immerses you into the WW1 feel, play operations and goddamn
Dom Anthony Jesus Besides the total crap rewards and leveling system and the grand total of 5 guns in the game, BF1 is a vastly superior game to BF4. Although I do miss my helis very much...
A-Town 92501 I agree lack of weapons and nerfing of level 10 weapons really sucks. The reward systems are so stupid, never been a big fan of medals but it happened so naturally in BF4.
Dom Anthony Jesus The reason why people hated BF4 back in 2013 was because they barely could play it. However with bf1 now, it's terrible and broken.
BF4's vehicle gameplay was way better. Tanking and Jets actually requires more skill and were more sayisfying.
manav bhalla I honestly hated the Jets. dogfights were so boring because you would constantly be going in circles for minutes upon minutes trying to catch the other guy
True, now all you have to do it get an attack plane and not shoot near the enemy and they die where in Bf4 you get a little bird and you have to directly hit them
VancouverCanucksRock lock-ons were annoying as shit, they took no skill.
+Eric Diego With a tank you need even less skill
+VancouverCanucksRock Lock on weapons? I had 20 kills with a stinger and igla. Also don't bring assumption to debates, makes you look like an idiot.
Bf1 is my savior for many reasons, so I'll list the main ones.
1. No more modern or futuristic bullshit. I got tired of modern games after bf3 and hardline wasn't a refresher. I hoped for ww2 but I love the ww1 setting just as much. I don't get why anyone would still want another modern shooter after 4 modern battlefields in a role.
2. The action. Oh the action. I'm a console player so having 32 players on each team is new for me. I never go more than 30 seconds without engaging in combat. The problem with previous battlefields I see now is that with 12 players max on each team, big conquest matches were almost all like stealthy games. Whenever I fought the enemy, it was almost always another single troop. But in bf1 I see huge battles going on with multiple players all fighting in the same areas all over the maps. Now I can't play other battlefields on consoles as much because they rarely have those epic battle moments. Bf1 feels like WAR.
3. Finally I love the fact that there isn't much customization because it makes me feel like a soldier, not a Rambo commander. Seeing people run around with crazy setups ruins the feeling of WAR for me. For example, yesterday I went back to playing my beloved bf3 after six months of not playing, but I didn't get that WAR feeling I got in bf1. It felt like I was in a call of duty free for all, and we all know that COD isn't a war game.
Overall bf1 is a WAR game, not another cod ripoff with vehicles added in to make it look like battlefield.
I feel like battlefield has gotten dumbed down
***** They've made it simpler, less complex. Easier for people new to the series.
Lol because they expect more people will buy their game more often *Cod fans* and make them hate their previous beloved game
Jake vxj Its because of their developer DICE and their new outlook on their franchise Battlefield ever since they rebooted Battlefront and Anita Sarrkesian (I know that's not how you spell her last name but it's close)
The triple A way, my friend ):
@@simonrodgers2375 This game is hard as fuck to level compared to older Battlefields
I am the only one one who likes bf1
carrim amod Nope I like it too
carrim amod I absolutely love it
+carrim amod nope, I love it
carrim amod Just you wait, when the next bf is released bf1 will be "the greatest of all the battlefields"
Main thing people prefer BF4 over BF1 cause BF4 had 3 years to develop it's only been three months with BF1, il just put my trust in DICE to improve the game, just like their did with BF4.
"Removal of assault rifles"
I would like to disagree with you there my man. Have you played BF1?
BigFry9591 there arent any assault rifles in the game, ye dumb?
Garrett Howard you have all those prototype assault rifles for the assault class that are irritating as fuck
Garrett Howard Yes, the prototype rifles. What Jon said.
They're pretty bad beyond ten-twenty meters, and they turn into 6+ shot kills very quickly. If you're a medic, support, or recon, and you find assaults annoying, you're probably not playing your class properly.
BigFry9591 arent " assault rifles " they, just why do i bother
BF4 is easily the better of the two, but BF1 is still great.
Levolution was fun. I liked how it could vastly change how a flag was played. Shanghai was the only one that kinda sucked. And just like with BC2 the reason there is more destruction is because the buildings are dinky little 2 to 3 story houses. There's almost no building destruction with the city map, and others.
BF1 needs more iron sights. It's really annoying finding a gun you like, but it's whopping 2 iron sight options are pure trash. Who decided it was good to lock optical's to specific guns? Was it to make there appear to be more guns in the game? And considering how many guns were in use during WWI the selection in BF 1 is pathetic.
Being able to repair your vehicle while inside needs to never be in a BF again. Taking your class away if you get into an offensive ground vehicle is also retarded. I jump in a tank then escape before it's destroyed, so now i'm forced to use a shitty gun I'm not familiar with. I went into the tank with my gun, where'ed it go? This idea is great for air vehicles, though.
Random weather is cool, but fog needs to go away. Fog looks great, but creates a terrible environment to play in. Some particle effects seem to be overdone too. There is enough smoke and shit created by players, we don't need the map creating more shit to obscure the view to a target. I feel giants shadow is the worst with this, and also one of the worst BF maps I've ever played.
BF1 in my opinion is kinda boring, healing vehicles like tanks from the inside is like a littlebird team the thing's almost unkillable without a direct team attacking it, class changes are horrible Assault is Engineer, Support is just ammo, Recons are pure anti-teamplay, and medic is just a generic assault without the grenade launcher.
The maps in my opinion not at all good, feels like hardline too enclosed
Map effects are bad/not needed, the point of the fog is to stop snipers it seem
Guns are variations of others.
Environment destruction is good
Turrets are actually useful/useable
Forcing you to use a crap weapon after going in a vehicle discourages me from going in vehicles, or I might as well go down with it because i'm not used to the weapon so i'm gonna die regardless in some circumstances.
Only one tank busting class, discourages people from using other classes
But on a positive note making people play medic more because it's a auto full heal, and 100 points was good
But not adding hardline's ability to just take the ammo, or med kit off someone was not good
***** Yes.
I agree for now but when you must think about it, Battlefield 4 only became a better game after a year and battlefield 1 is only 3 months in and it's kinda unfair right now.
However the point of vehicle classes is to encourage players to be dedicated to the vehicle they are using. It's completely fair and reduces the amount of people who uses vehicles as taxis.
Warfan2001 They fixed BF4 and made it what it was supposed to be. BF1 is already what it is supposed to be.
Nobody uses a tank or canon truck (whatever it's called) as taxis, and I said i'm fine with that feature for planes.
Inept Jedi , Shanghai is THE MOST gameplay changing leveloution event ;)
if you miss anything from bf4 just play bf4
Ben true but there aren't very many servers running especially for dlc maps :( I want to play more final stand
this is such a dumb statement. EA is giving zero fucks about 4. Small playerbase, few servers. We need Bf6 to have a modern setting.
Bf4 64 not including sidearms bf1 has 24 including pistols
Also gadgets
The gadgets in bf1 are a joke 99% are useless
Ty Brenninger sniper decoy like seriously what in the actual fuck.
Wait.. so you don't think 99% of the gadgets in BF4 are troll/useless? lol
Ty Brenninger how many of those 64 weapons you use in bf4 lol?
If we had bf1 with bf4's progression and unlocks i would be so happy.
The main reason as to why BF4 is currently better than BF1 is the development teams. DICE Stockholm always destroys game balance and leaves the game in a bad state until DICE LA comes in and fixes it. That's what needs to happen with BF1. Stockholm can make the expansions and the maps but leave game balance and other quality of life patches to DICE LA. DICE LA turned BF4 into one of the best games in the entire franchise
Sagman Twelve But the balance is great ATM tho?? Sure, there are some flaws, but its still very good overall.
Sagman Twelve dice la can't fix this game. The balance isn't what's wrong, sure the balance sucks but the game is never going to be that fun
Ninja4editS Constant grenade spam,support class sucks,m1903 variants are awful,every level 10 weapon needs a buff,spawn killing is worse than its ever been before,the assault class needs something better to deal with tanks. seriously, I should be able to strap dynamite to a bike and blow up a tank.
I agreein the dynamite part. If C4 sticks on a modern tank right away then dynamite should stick on the A7V
Grenade spam was a thing in real life WW1. No change needed here.
Support class is great if you use it in the right way. Its not supposed to be a close-range class like most think. Its supposed to SUPPORT. Suppressing, giving ammo to teammates, blowing out walls etc. Use it in the right way and its just as good as all other classes :)
Agree that lvl 10 weapons need some balancing, yeah. Hellriegel is fine, but the rest of them could use some tweaking. Not gamebreaking tho.
The assault class should not be used to deal with tanks? What are you talking about? Classes are supposed to be used for different objectives. Taking down tanks is not something an Assault player should do.
Most of the stuff you pointed out is only your own opinion. Nothing that most agree on other than the grenade spam which Dice is problaby not going to adress, and the lvl 10 weapons which pretty much everyone agrees on.
bf1 is so casual its not even funny, ive had it since the end of october and im still level 12 due to the fact that the game is boring af. I spend most of my game time in the loading screen, followed by either a game on the verge of finishing, or a black bugged screen. IT PISSES ME OFF SO FUCKING MUCH! the weapon balancing is awful, there are 2 main classes to go for, the medic and the sniper as they are IMO the most dominant classes with the best weapons, you can practically quick scope people on bf1 due to the fact that it is so easy to snipe on it, the medic weapons can just 3 tap at any range also. And wtf is with the "hold a to skip" option, its literally the dumbest thing in the game, medic runs toward someone to revive them to only be dissapointed that the player just fucking respawned. fuck this game BF3, BF4 were so much better than this waffle of a game.
Rick Sanchez
Ita not boringand loading takes less than 2 mins in ps4
BF3 and BF4 was nothing but Vehicle domination. You were forced to use Engineer class every match because of how Overpowered they are. Also, the Assault Class was very good in BF1. I use it to take out Planes and tanks.
only if you're still active to see battlefield V now...
Battlefield 3 and bad company 2 are the best battlefield ever made. Hands down.
jonathan smith battlefield 2 tho
🏆bad company 2
👍battlefield 3
👌battlefield 4
😂hardline
😴battlefield 1
😒🔫
MrCatsEyes if you were on consoles PS3/PS4 like me ......
🏆Battlefield 4
(My first 64 player experience)
👍Battlefield 3
👌🏾battlefield 1
🤔😒hardline was meh and it still is, never got the new maps but the game just doesn't fit the theme of battlefield.
MrCatsEyes BC2 was the best
KinG x STuDx I know bc2 was the best bro
snipercanez imo bf3 was better than bf4 but yeh kool , were all different
nah
👑BF3
Wasn't bf4 the worst bf like a month ago?
Paddlez-is-king I think you're mistaking bf4 with hardline ^^
Paddlez-is-king no you're right everyone was all "bf4 is the shittiest bf besides the one we don't speak of" and now they're saying "BF1 is the shittiest bf PERIOD"
AKA_U-MAD when we're they saying this? Hardline was the most recent hate storm
Sol the Gamer it quite literally all over the comments on levelcaps vids at a certain point in time but i remember it was really annoying
AKA_U-MAD literally just like cod players. The new title sucks bandwagon
bf4 wins just dont even need a video.
Garrett Howard agreed
# CamPingWJoei Yeah no shit BF4 is way older than BF1
# CamPingWJoei no just no
Lmao graphics don’t mean nothing, there’s things you can do in BF4 that you can’t do in BF1
BF4 Looks fucking amazing on the pro bro you need to upgrade. Plays smoother as well.
bf1 is better imo. did not enjoy bf4 much. Bf3 was much better then bf4.
Berry McCockinner I agree
Berry McCockinner imo bf4 > bf1. bf4 has better progression system than fucking warbonds
Berry McCockinner i agree completely. Thats what I thought, too, but I think we are pretty alone with this opinion. Maybe because I just missed historical fps games. I just love the ww area from a historical point of view.
Shut up and remaster Bad Company 1&2 already
or just play them
ZAIN AKBAR ikr! If we don't get bc3, then at least we should get bc 2 multiplayer remastered in Battlefield 5 or something
Or make a new one. Jk Dice is just a shell of it's former self drained of their creative capabilities by the corporate greed and blatant disregard for the customer that EA continously dislplays. They'd just fuck it up if they tried.
I'd prefer new games instead of stuff I've already played for so long. I would only get bored quicker playing a remaster in my opinion.
ZAIN AKBAR preach!!!!!
Personally i prefer the aesthetics of BF1 but the game play of BF4. even though BF1 started on a better foot I prefer the faster time to kill. also on a slightly separate note if dice/ea continue to do more vintage settings for their battlefield games I'd love to see one set in the Korean War, cuz I don't think a single game has ever done it before, same with WWI until now. or maybe even a Vietnam setting. I know they already did that in bad company 2 (?) with the update/dlc/thing but idk it'd be nice to see something more flushed out, maybe see like the grittier side of that war. but that's not gonna be for another like 3 years so you know
Adam Fonseca yes and that's exactly what it is personal opinion good job proud of you
You had a stand alone called Battlefield Vietnam, it came out after BF1942 some time, so BC2 was not the first in that.
I just wish they didnt make the game so noob friendly, but when the devs are casual/noobs, then what other to expect, back in the older days, games were harder to master, sadly those times are gone.
I Have Both, And In My Opinion BF4 Is Better. I Bought BF1 For No Reason. I Still Play BF4. They're Still Both Good Games. BF3 Is Also Another Good Game. I Have A Collection Of The Battlefield Franchise.
next battlefield should be in present time...
PAIN - that's battlefield 4 man
RocketsGaming i know
PAIN - WWII would be fun
idk bf4 works for me
i would want a real Battlefield 5 next please.
Funny how one man's trash is another man's treasure. I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players.
Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested?
What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
you are so right sir. BF1 is a step in the right direction. BF is FPS on a massive scale, with high end war equipment like tanks and airplanes. That should therefore be its main focus. Diluting it, and obstructing it with the "clusterfuck of unlocks" like in bf4 is just bad. People in it for the progress should rather pick up a RPG in stead, and let the big boys play the game, as it was meant to be played.
Filip Piletic great comment, spot on!
Filip Piletic finaly a intelligent commet this deserves to be at the top of this video
Battlefield 3 was by far the most immersive Battlefield game I've played. It wasn't by any means perfect, though I had a lot of fun.
Battlefield 4 is better. Easily.
# CamPingWJoei Graphics dont fucking matter
Im sure you liked battlefield 4 when it came out now you hate it because people are saying they hate it
# CamPingWJoei You must be suck at it
If graphics matter bf2 would be shit
Guys calm down xD preferences can't be disputed
Go Cardinals facts
Battlefield 1 for sure , better cinematically , better immersion , better soundtrack .
new weapon! glowing 1000 degree knife! Make it happen DICE
I like battlefield 1 but I like having variety in weapons having 4 guns with different attachments doesn't count as a new weapons and there were plenty of weapons for them to choose from to put in game and I prefer unlocking attachments by getting a certain amount of kills rather than just buying it
I liked how in BF4, we could look around while in steering some vehicles, while using the motion feature in the PS4 controller. It allowed for flexibility. I am disappointed that it isn't implemented in BF1. But Bf1 is dope for Sprinting and pressing the crouch button.
i like BF1 better because i am a history buff. The game will give you facts about World War I while you wait for a multilplayer matches which i find awesome. Not to mention this is the first WWI game to be made.
Verdun, Necrovision, the several RTS games. But yeah, I love the risk they took.
Jack Clock i mean big ones
I'm more of a ww2 fan so i hope they make that era next. especially with the new operations mode
WW2 has been done to death.
so has modern combat..
Still playing battlefield 3. Way better than the rest.
bingo im still waiting on a true successor to bf3 . until then im playing bf3 everyday
The only thing I like better about 4 is the weapon customization. That's about it. Vehicles were nerfed, map design was poor, ect.
Marion Cobretti have you played the dragon valley map, or the night operations?
Dragon val is a franchise map that's over a decade old.
Dave L. Yeah but it's still fun in bf4
Battlefield 4 will forever keep it's place in my heart as the best Battlefield title. It has more variety in gameplay than any battlefield I have played in a while and honestly, after four or so years of playing it with friends and family, I still find new things to do and crazy fun to be had. While yes, I do have fun playing Battlefield 1 with my friends I just find it to be more tamed and realistic, self serious so to say. For example, just this weekend in BF4 me and my friend drove a car into an elevator and glitched it onto a roof, driving it around and massacring every enemy that came up the elevator; while in battlefield 1 I found me and my friends just driving planes into eachother or driving boats out of combat zone and killing everyone. While still fun and ultimately hilarious, Battlefield 4 just keeps that "Only in battlefield" quality that I have come to expect from a DICE game. Battlefield 4 will forever be my favorite video game and, for the sake of pure gameplay, the best Battlefield title since Bad Company 2.
"lack of weapons in BF1"
you do realize this takes place over 100 years ago when war was really primitive, right?
You do realize that in ww1 they actually had a lot of weapons right? It's just that bf1 gets them completely wrong because other than machine guns, there were very few automatic weapons....they were mostly bolt action rifles
James Lowe “war was primitive” haha, what?
It wasn't thaaaat primitive. Of course compared to bf4.... But for its time this was a huuuge leap.
Lmao when you say primitive you make it sound like they were fighting with sticks and stones foh ww1 had a shit Ton of weapons and idgaf if most were bolt action they still were different guns from different factions fuck you
i consistently have more fun in bf1 than i ever did in bf4, way more epic moments. I found bf4 had many frustrating features like getting sniped from across the map with 40x scopes, automatic weapons everywhere, SUAV and attack chopper whores. Does it lack guns and a good progression system? yes. is that enough to make me go back to bf4? no. wait for a few patches, dlcs. things will get better.
Jambi Jambs you just sound trash bud
BF1 pros and cons compared to BF4:
Pros:
Much better map design/level layouts
More destruction, which is well balanced, helped by the better map design
Better graphics(of course)
Much better optimization and from launch at the same time.
Better launch.
IMO better campaign, but both meh
Cons:
Less weapons(variations don't count)
OP Vehicles
granade spam is back
Recoil is none-existing
Spread is huge and Dice have chosen bullet spread(randomness) over Recoil(skill), just sad
Neutral:
Even though it's theme is WW1 it plays out like BF4 without ARs and helicopters, but with much stronger vehicles and much better maps.
All and all, both games are epic and I like then equally, but I think I slightly prefer BF1 over BF4.
Pablo Horteg indeed, but I played in servers that had them forbidden and most infantry servers were like that, they were NOT a big problem or at all in vehicle game modes.
I don't think you understand the meaning of the word "equally", my friend.
I can put up with grenade spam but goddamn, the gas is horrible. People spam gas and shotgun/smg everywhere. Half the time, I'm wearing a gasmask.
I'm not even sure how you can balance something like gas spamming.
E-1 91H easy, you reduce the time of the gas and you do NOT resupply it.
I don't know why people are protecting this game unlike hardline hardline honestly was more fun than bf1 with its slow progression system sure bfh didn't have much content at launch but it was fun sometimes and it kinda had weapon variety? also bf1 kinda got rid of skill when you compare it to bf4 I mean don't get me wrong bf1 can be fun I think this battlefield has more devolution than any previous battlefield titles but its only fun for like 1 game after that you just get sick of it at least that's my experience
also let me skip those goddamn cinematics for operations I get it, ww1 was tough but for fucks sake I don't give a flying fuck
drates Dragetes I'm pretty sure it's to cover up a loading screen. I'd rather have that than some pictures tbh.
drates Dragetes hardlines major flaw was TTK was really bad
sepoman How about all of the people who actually enjoy it? lol
Cole Warden Wow, people are still on that population joke about Hardlune, huh? *yawn*
I love bf4: I Played it over 800h because of how you were able to customize your class.
In bf1 everyone uses the sniper, in bf4 you needed a lot of skill to use recon and now someone as me that was good at it can't play bf1.
Also, a lot of people use the Bar in support.
It is very strong and you can die with few shots.
Compare BF4 to BF1, when BF1 gets all the DLC
It's still gonna be the same... It's not like bf1 will get more weapons even with DLC's than bf4 for example.
Even without dlc BF4 had a ton of guns.
BF3 > BF4 > BF1
Guilherme Tieppo id say bf4=bf3>>bf1
I feel like they kinda dumbed down bf1 for the casuals.
ZIPPER978 yeah, snipers are extremely easy, to pander to cod quickscopers
I have 100 hours in BF1 and it's boring as hell now. Same thing over and over. No teamwork, games always play the same way, it's just too repetitive for a BF game. There's not enough variety to keep things interesting.
Been playing Overwatch again, and getting bored of that now too. Kinda the same thing. Lots of heroes, but everyone always picks the same most of the time, and there's really only a couple game modes lol. How many times can you do an escort the payload on rails? Might go back to playing Siege again. There's a ton of variety between matches in that game.
Vi7aLi7Y I have played all three of those games and siege is by far my favourite
***** I'm going to get back to it after this month. They got the Diablo 3 OG diablo event going on right now.
Battlefield has turned intro CoD now
Vi7aLi7Y I got bored of Overwatch and Battlefield 1 for the exact same reasons you did. In BF1 I climbed all the way to the top on 3 out of the 4 Classes and let me tell you: It is underwhelming as hell. As Rank 10 Medic I get a shitty FIVE SHOT PIECE OF SHIT THAT ONLY GETS IRON SIGHTS?!?! As Scout Rank 10 I get a 1-SHOT SHITTY RIFLE WITH ONLY IRON SIGHTS?!!? As Rank 10 Assault I get the most broken gun I have ever seen in any Battlefield game. Great. Can't wait for everyone to hate me when I kill them (ultimate sarcasm). I see the Hellriegel as the Dark Side of the Assault Class. It's powerful, overwhelming and all around annoying. I got bored, stopped playing and ended up buying Battlefield 4 for the PS4 (with Premium). I had Battlefield 4 on the PS3 and was amazing at it. I advanced to Level 100+ easy and consistently got in the top 5 of my Team in any Mode. I can't wait to get back there again.
And Overwatch is fun, but it REALLY needs more Content ASAP. A new Map (Oasis) is not nearly enough for me to want to come back. It needs a big DLC or massive new Content Drop. Something like 5+ new Characters , 3 new Game Modes and 4 new Maps. That would bringe back for sure. But seeing as that looks like it isn't going to happen, Overwatch is just as barren as a Desert for me. (see what I did with the Oasis-Desert thing? ;D)
vampireguy24 yeah, i feel you. I been gaming less and less really. Everything is stale. Rarely do I play a new game more than 3 hours and never touch it again, if that. I been back playing Siege. At least the rounds are different enough and not the exact same thing over and over. Plus they've added a lot and continue to add a lot to it.
Bf4 honestly
BF1 is the most fun battlefield I've played by far
I sold bf1 after a week of play, bf4 100 times better
No content in bf1 there's like 16 weapons
Kyle Dixon I completely agree
***** I completely agree. Usually when a new game comes out it gets hyped up. Kind of like what happened with hardline
Mason Pac id still be on bf3 if I could or bad company 2 wish those would be remastered
I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players.
Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested?
What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
This maybe controversial, but now playing battlefield 4 compared to battlefield 1 and battlefield 1 is just a superior game as it relates to the feel of immersion and the gunplay. Guns in battlefield 4 feel like BB guns compared to battlefield 1. When you kill someone in battlefield 1 it just feels a lot more satisfying.
I biggest thing I hate about BF1 is the lack of customization and weapons. For the assault class for example, you only get 5 guns. And they basally use different variety of guns (trench, optical) as fillers. There no attachments for guns and you get very little choices for customizing.
They certainly had a good selection of weapons, and seeing how DICE is taking creative liberties by using weapons such as the Hellriegel there SHOULD be more weapon variety.
EinoKeino xD The only thing we can customize are the visuals, scope, and scope magnification. That's it. Instead of adding the variety of weapons like experimental, optical, marksman, they should give us the freedom to customize the guns how we want.
I hate how Assault only has 3 machine guns and the rest are shotguns.
Funny how one man's trash is another man's treasure. I LIKE the fact that there's is no clusterfuck of unlocks and meaningless medals and whatnot like in BF4. It was a mess that made the game harder to balance and less accessable to new players.
Are you really that ADHD that you need a flashy unlock after every 10 kills to keep you interested?
What happened with the time when we played Counter Strike and Call of Duty 2 and other games that had zero unlocks and the only progression was player's skill?
They need to bring back the BF4 customization system and introduce character customization.
BF1 is my first Battlefield as I was always a COD guy. All I can say is the learning curve is steep. TTK is insanely fast, but the game doesn't really become frustrating. Thus far I'm really happy with it.
I got it for Christmas, and I haven't opened it. Should I take it back or keep it???
Bernie Clock Keep it. It's extremely fun. Just a little shallow
Battlefield 1 is head and shoulders better than Battlefield 4 IMO, Battlefield 4 brought me into the franchise but battlefield 1 made me into a fan, it's so much better, more fun, games aren't dominated by experienced players, it's honestly the best fps I've ever played
CarreraGT im a bf fan too but bf1 is just getting boring. i have not had that with bf4 after 400 hours
CarreraGT theres nothing to do after level 20, in other shooter liked titanfall u can go for all camos, all titan upgrades etc, even in cod you have more reason to play after level 20, the game has such little content, in bf4 you had SOOOOOOOOOOOO Much more to do
CarreraGT so your only point is games aren't dominated by experienced players? that literally just comes down to who's playing.
I really don't understand how you can try and voice your point without giving anything lol
CarreraGT Bro experienced players are supposed to be good it says it in the name this game kinda ruined it for me. After a week I got to lvl 23 and I got so bored I went back to BF4 trying to unlock the last guns because even though I've played the shit out of BF4 I still have stuff to unlock and actually a purpose to play it. Fuck battlefield 1