3:41 honestly all the excuses they give for his scar don’t add up AT ALL. Being struck by a buffalo would mean his whole face and body would be broken. A snake bite would have two puncture marks. Nah, Scar got his scar from his “father” (his bio daddy was the guy/Lion his mother was messing w on the side)
Fun fact: a lot of African tribes have a tradition of naming weak/sick babies names with less-than-pleasant meanings to keep the spirits from taking them. Ergo, Ahadi and Uru naming Scar "Taka" was their way of keeping him from dying as a cub.
As far as I know... For a while, King Ahadi loved both his sons equally, but that changed over time. Taka began to make friends with the hyenas living on the border of Ndnona's lion pride territory, which was, of course, forbidden to a lion. From then on, Ahadi turned away from his second son, only caring for 'the golden boy' Mufasa. Muafasa's character also changed, he became pompous with his brother and spent less and less time with him. As a result, Taka became estranged from his father and brother, and from all the other members of the lion pride except his mother, Queen Uru. Taka may have received the scar, which later became his trademark, from his father as a child or as a young adult, or it may have been given to him by his brother Mufasa when Taka challenged him for leadership of the pride. From then on, Taka died and Scar was born. King Ahadi grew old and named his eldest son Mufasa as king of the Ndona Pride. From then on, Taka spent all his time with his mother. Uru sensed that he would soon be taking after his mate, so he asked "his little prince" that if he could not forget the hurtful words and rough play of his father and brother, he should at least forgive them. The next morning only Scar woke up, Uru was dead. The "eternal second" prince was left alone for a long time after that.
Yes but a tale of two brothers is FAN MADE!! The only real, cannon answer to the question of how he got his scar is the snake. Not ahadi or the buffalos or mufasa.
@@Robin-Is-A-Birdplus the guy wouldn’t have met the hyenas if he became evil when he got the scar by the snake at the age of an adult. That’s not even in the lion king time line, he interacted with them as a kid while ahadi was busy with mufassa
In the newest movie Scar was a coward and watched his mom get attacked by 2 male lions, he also betrayed Mufasa because the female lion that was with them found out he was a coward as well.
@@nina-raedelong158 although it also means "waste, trash or to waste." Which does fit because he wasted his whole life. If he wanted to be a king he could have left and started his own pride.
When someone is made to feel unvalued, their bitterness can cause them to do some horrible things later on in life. They'll often take it out on people who didn't hurt them at all. Hurting people hurt people.
I relate, but it's feminism in my family for me, my mom treated both my sisters better than me, my dad allowed it. Neglected, abused, now they wonder why I don't want any women like them
The name "Taka" isn't actually canon, the A tale of true brothers book isn't canon the canon backstory was from the Lion Guard his name was confirmed to be Askari named after the first leader of the Lion Guard which... IS CANON. Mufasa means "King" in swahili, Askari on the other hand actually means soldier, he was named to protect his big brother ar the leader of the guard.
Then who was the cub at the very end of the original movie Rafiki walked up and presented to all of the Pridelands that had black ears whereas in the sequel, Kiara as a baby had no black on her ears when Nala carried her in her mouth?
@@RedPandaGirl002 The baby at the end of the first Lion King was called Fluffy as a place holder, when Lion King first came out Disney didn't actually think the movie would be successful neither did anyone think it would be worthy of sequel. However, when they did make the sequel the cub was later named and confirmed to be Kiara.
Well the book isn't canon anymore but it used to be before the lion guard came along, but saying it was a snake is just weird cause it doesn't really fit to how it looks. A snake bite wouldn't look like that right? Plus he'd be blind if that was the case since snakes are poisonous, or some are.
Technically Scar should have been king since black maned lions are stronger then golden mane lions and lions can have a Coalition of two or three brothers who can rule the land even tho one would be alpha to have rights to mate.
@@FantasticFawnleap lions irl favor ones with black manes. The dark coloration comes from testosterone and the more successful and confident a lion is, the more testosterone it has and therefore the darker its mane is, and other lions know this. So the other lions favor lions with darker manes
@@FantasticFawnleap and? I’m not saying that Scar should have been king, I’m just agreeing with the other person that in real life, in nature, the dark maned lions are usually the ones that females go for
Also in the lion guard there is a. Different backstory for how he got his scar but when I get the chance I am gonna take a look at a tale if two brothers because that seems really important
Fun fact, the darker haired lion would be considered the more masculine out of the two lions. All the females would have wanted scar and not mufsa in real life lol.
What do I think...it is taking an obviously established evil fictional character who initially had no real back story then creating a endless stream of what if's to try to paint him as possibly a victim. Yet you see in the main movie that he murders the king and then instead of justly ruling he is a tyrant. The only way any prior speculative stories can be made to set him as possibly just a abused victim who went for revenge is if the initial part of the story were completly altered. He would have at least tried to make the kingdom function to some degree otherwise but it plainly states he stripped the land dry purposly.
Many people not so well mentally were victims of some sort at some point in their lives. Booth can be true at the same time. Even in the first movie we see how Mufassa treats him, constsntly putting his physical advantage over him. Dominating and in a sense even unessrsarily "demasculating" Scar. His Name is also changed after his injury he carries in his face, and even then kinda gives us a reason for all the resentment and why he became this ruthless and evil. His downfall booth tied to the Hyenas and the lack of love he inspired in his subjects. So adding some more background isn't the problem. You just gotta learn that you can acknowledge evil and the origin why. No one is born evil. But they still get judged for it all the same.
@@TrafalgarWaterDLaw-dl5cm I do not dissagree with your reasoning but choosing to become a monster because of the abusers around oneself is not the answer. While a child has no way of removing themselves from their abusers on their own they can still choose not to give into the liars whispers. Eventually all individuals must accept that they can not co-exists around those that refuse to accept them. That they must remove themselves stop wasting their love on those monsters and foster relations with more ginuine individuals. Yes there will be slander and other means used to turn the abused into monsters but that is what the abusers want. It gives them an excuse to destroy the abused person or to make anything they speak about seem a lie. It is simply a game psycologicly that they use to try to destroy the witness. In the end one must choose to become spiritually awaked or to give in to the hate. Most give in to hate and seek revenge. Not knowing they only reienforce the abusive monsters labling of them to all those around. What they can not see is that there is a whole world outside of their tiny existance and that eventually they will meet others who are not wolves in sheeps clothes. My comment is about how the original character must have alterations made to his disposition in order for origin stories like these to fit in. But you cannot go about changing the narative to suit ones own agenda. Truth is truth and lies are lies. Half truthes are just manipulations of reality. If they truely wish to make these new origin stories make sense they must go back to the original material and make a alternative version from scars perspective and use his offscreen time to show another side of him. Until then all these what ifs are meaningless what ifs.
If you believe the new movie that's about to come out which is more Canon than the books because it's on screen, it seems like you're correct that the scar was not his original name but also that they are technically not blood there at all, no blood relation. In fact Mufasa isn't even a royal blood and it actually explains why scar can't stand him so much because he basically usurped the throne.
Sadly novel and lion guard are not canon, well maybe in their universe. In live action one it was said that mufasa was an orphan and taka being next in line
Scar getting a redemption arc would be rather cool to see I can imagine Simba Kovu and Kiara Shenzi Banzai Ed and the Hyenas discovering the truth about Simba's grandfather and I can imagine Simba now hating his grandfather more than Scar especially Shenzi Banzai and Ed becoming allies and friends to Simba would be awesome too I like Hyenas. I especially like The Hyena Trio.
Poor Scar; living in the shadow of his brother, to be abused by his father. MAAAAN no wonder my bro fell to the wayside. Favoritism never ends well and adding abuse only makes it 100 times worse.
@@xxxnarurto5747 If The Lion King gotten another movie I can see Simba Shenzi Banzai Ed and the Hyenas becoming allies especially with Shenzi telling Simba about his grandfather and how bad and evil his grandfather was to his uncle I'm imagining Simba hating his grandfather more than his Uncle Scar especially after finding out the truth and Shenzi telling him his grandfather is the reason why she and her family are forced to live in The Elephant Graveyard.
This is the reason why i love anime such as Dragonball z in the show there are a few villains with a back story but there are also villains who are evil because they are evil like frieza and it works
As a kid, I was the youngest brother out of two, AND WITH AUTISM, so it was sad my parents had more favoritism for my older brother than they did for me, that is if anyone's familiar with autism, and well enough to understand it decently.
But in that movie they are not actually brothers. Mufasa is adopted and earns the right to rule so there is a reason for Scar to hate Mufasa. Scar (named Taka in the trailer) rescued him and lost his future crown for it.
When I look at this story I think of Gods of Egypt when the Sun God RA declared Unitis his first son King of Egypt while his second son Seth ruled the deserts leaving him nothing and was denied a son while Seth was married to Goddess Memphis
I like how the mufasa movie kind of used inspiration from the book for how scar got the scar. Yes, i know it’s not directly a buffalo stampede or anything but the scar was given to taka due to his actions caused by jealousy. i like to think the tale of two brothers is canon to the animated series and the live action remake has their own origin. they’re both basically the same thing tho although i do like the live action one more.
you can consider this story canon to the animated series, the live action remakes are set in a different universe so a different origin for the characters isn’t impossible
Guys Mufasa was a great father right? What if he had two sons, would he act like his father by praising one of them and break down the other or would he treat them both equally.
Simba in the Lion Guard certainly showed favortism towards his cubs. (Although I take Simba's personality in that series with a grain of salt since his movie version had a totally different personality).
@@CynderSpirit You are right, his personality does change, but maybe he matured from a young ruler to becoming a father of two and king of the Pride lands. There was a large time skip.
Nice video. If they do address the relationship in the upcoming special, I think it would actually work if this is how they approach the issue. To coin a phrase from a friend of mine "the best kind of villainy is the kind when the villain is perfectly within their rights to be upset, but go about it in all the wrong ways." Hades and Maleficent(both incarnations) are prime examples, however 2014 Maleficent realizes her mistake, and does everything she can to rectify it. This can also be seen in other media like X-Men with Magneto, or Batman: the animated series with Mr. Freeze. Then there's alsoThor from 2011, which runs a bit similar yet differently. I think it would be interesting to have this be the reason why Scar was evil, and the icing on the cake...Ahadi created his own Frankenstein.
Weird tho, because the lion guard said scar was scarred by a snake with a venom that turned him evil. That in a series that explained why kion was not in lion king 2
King Ahadi sounds like a two faced father he loved muffusa more than he did scar muffusa was his father favorite child scar should have been treated no different for crying out loud that's your son and saying scar isn't fit to be king also being jealous of his brother that's what sets him to be evil 😈 in the future lion King
Man, I wish this was story for the new Mufasa movie and instead they decided to not use this. The trailer shows they are completely ignoring that this novel exists.
Taka doesn’t immediately mean trash in Swahili, taka means want, that is the first thing one will think of when you mention taka, takataka is the Swahili word trash, taka is like slang only used in some very specific regions. Swahili has such many words where when you join two of the same words the meaning completely changes like “Bara” which means Ocean but when you add another “bara” to the word for it to become “barabara” it then means road.
In the "A Tale of Two Brothers" origin story, You're right that Ahadi could have reassured Taka that the three of them would go on a hunt as soon as possible. Still, as for the rest of the story, it seems that the only reason Ahadi's favoring Mufasa and diminishing Taka is that Mufasa really does understand kingly duties and Taka's a spoiled brat.
In the new mufasa movie trailer it looks like disney changed the story to where mufasa was not scars "blood brother" and ahadi seems like a good father in the trailer so i guess we just have to wait
Even so scar committed the sin of killing his brother for the actions of his dad did and that is where he went wrong but I digress that muffasa could have done more as well but did not
funny thing is lions with a darker mane are generally more dominate then lions with the lighter manes, so in succession i feel Scar would have been the more desirable choice over Mufasa but the malnourishment and the fact that animals usually abandon the sicker or less healthy of the litter, and that Mufasa was the first born, would end up making him less of a choice. knowing he was the lesser in his fathers eyes would have lead to Scar being the Lion we know him to be.
In 2025 Ahadi is not his father and Uru is not his mother and he loved taka more then mufasa mufasa was adopted pride rock did not exist and scar did not get scratched by his father.
I think that made him succeptable to villiany. There could have been other influence like the hyenas who lived seperate from the kingdom or the outlanders remember until Simba told Kovu he never understood what happened with scar as told by simba. They have different perspectives, really all I know is it's not natural for lions to eat mice for lunch. I don't think Simba was any help at all. Ultimately it wasn't good for Mufasa neither as it gave him a hidden enemy and someone who was determined to take his life in the end. Ahadis favoritism toward Mufasa, him embracing it was a lot driving the uumph of his decline. Sometimes it is important we don't neglect one for because that breeds animosity it is bad parenting. The trouble is I am willing to bet that Mufasa was entirely blindsided by the whole thing but I think too that maybe it could have been different if they banned together because well they were the next generation. Scar was probably thinking "He could have sticked up for me to daddy but he chose not to, why did he have to choose not to and this made him look for other things Ahadi did wrong so he could find fault in his rule. He seeked and found from the hyenas to Zira and everything in between. That angered him and made him think that his uncle was right in what he was talking about with the royal family.
But the live action says mufasa was adopted after scar saved his life,if so than that was messed up how the king favored his adopted son more than his own son
That’s part of the reason the movie failed. The original books Taka was abused and a rejection to his family except Mufasa whom for some reason never tried to cheer him up
3:41 honestly all the excuses they give for his scar don’t add up AT ALL.
Being struck by a buffalo would mean his whole face and body would be broken. A snake bite would have two puncture marks.
Nah, Scar got his scar from his “father” (his bio daddy was the guy/Lion his mother was messing w on the side)
😢
Ya it actually makes more sense.
look at the lion guard episode Scar gets his scar from a snake that venom makes him bad
The snake later gave kion the same scar tho so it could have been that he moved or kinda blocked the other fang
That is literally what I was thinking the entire video! The Dad probably didn't believe Scar was his
Fun fact: a lot of African tribes have a tradition of naming weak/sick babies names with less-than-pleasant meanings to keep the spirits from taking them. Ergo, Ahadi and Uru naming Scar "Taka" was their way of keeping him from dying as a cub.
I love this
True awesome
What African tribes ?
Truly wholesome
@@goldiesworld2095exactly. He still didn’t responded back.
Looks like king Ahadi lost the father of the year award
🙅🏼♀️ King Ahadi SHOULDN'T have been named and/or labeled as the "King" of the Pride land to begin within the very 1st place either….!! 💯👎🏼💔🙄🤦🏼♀️😒😑
Scar actually might’ve turned out better if Ahadi and Mufasa had not treated him rather poorly.
@@ianjohnson7761 😉 True, but still….💯👎🏼💔😏
😢 really
Lost implies he had a chance
Evil isn't born. It is made.
The animals that sang "Not One of Us" were *wrong* to say about _that_ of and to Kovu right?
He probably didnt want him
@@EddyTheLion Who are Scar's REAL parents??
@Elysia63 lion king 1 producers say he was adopted . So might be anyone.
@Elysia63 yes sorry about that.
As far as I know...
For a while, King Ahadi loved both his sons equally, but that changed over time. Taka began to make friends with the hyenas living on the border of Ndnona's lion pride territory, which was, of course, forbidden to a lion.
From then on, Ahadi turned away from his second son, only caring for 'the golden boy' Mufasa. Muafasa's character also changed, he became pompous with his brother and spent less and less time with him.
As a result, Taka became estranged from his father and brother, and from all the other members of the lion pride except his mother, Queen Uru.
Taka may have received the scar, which later became his trademark, from his father as a child or as a young adult, or it may have been given to him by his brother Mufasa when Taka challenged him for leadership of the pride. From then on, Taka died and Scar was born.
King Ahadi grew old and named his eldest son Mufasa as king of the Ndona Pride.
From then on, Taka spent all his time with his mother. Uru sensed that he would soon be taking after his mate, so he asked "his little prince" that if he could not forget the hurtful words and rough play of his father and brother, he should at least forgive them.
The next morning only Scar woke up, Uru was dead. The "eternal second" prince was left alone for a long time after that.
finally someone got it right👍
@@Shad-qz5mr thank so much!
@@balasabence4553 yo u were waiting for a whole month for a reply. sad times😇
By the way, the Show "The Lion Guard" reveals how Scar got his scar. He was bitten by a snake.
Man you are right on correct. I also am a black sheep my names enos ivbaze from nigeria I can relate.
I definitely believe that scar would not have been a villain if his father showed that he loved him and expected alot from him.
Yea true
Yes but a tale of two brothers is FAN MADE!! The only real, cannon answer to the question of how he got his scar is the snake. Not ahadi or the buffalos or mufasa.
@@Robin-Is-A-Birdlooks like they going to use some of that "fan made" information for the new movie
@@Robin-Is-A-Birdplus the guy wouldn’t have met the hyenas if he became evil when he got the scar by the snake at the age of an adult. That’s not even in the lion king time line, he interacted with them as a kid while ahadi was busy with mufassa
In the newest movie Scar was a coward and watched his mom get attacked by 2 male lions, he also betrayed Mufasa because the female lion that was with them found out he was a coward as well.
This is Thor and Loki now 😂😂😂
This aged like gold. You predicted the future
@@klaushoxha3245except mufasa would technically be Loki now
More like Osiris and set
Taka also means "To Want"
As in "wanting to be king". I like that translation a little bit better.
@@nina-raedelong158 although it also means "waste, trash or to waste."
Which does fit because he wasted his whole life.
If he wanted to be a king he could have left and started his own pride.
@@ironvlogger9712 Yeah, but he did say he waas much waeker then his brother, so trying to start his own pride could have killed him.
Taka is the currency of my country 💀
😂😂@@Lester_da_Molester
It could be because Scar reminded Ahadi of himself and his own weaknesses.
This gives me Odin, Thor and Loki vibes from Marvel
When someone is made to feel unvalued, their bitterness can cause them to do some horrible things later on in life. They'll often take it out on people who didn't hurt them at all. Hurting people hurt people.
Correct, i really dont blame them
I feel like it was partially Ahadi’s fault that scar became evil
Because Mufasa is the *firstborn* son and Ahadi's favorite?
Scar wasnt his kid 😂
@@EddyTheLion Then who does Scar REALLY belonged to??
@@EddyTheLionDoesn't mean you make him feel like a reject and lesser.
.
🎯💯💯
It is the father's fault, for not loving them equally
Correct
i understand the feeling of neglection like scare i to was neglected a lot and that grew my resentment for a lot of people i don't want to trust
Je comprend ce que tu ressent,moi je ne fais même pas confiance en ma famille
I am like scar my dad treated me the same way im enos ivbaze
I relate, but it's feminism in my family for me, my mom treated both my sisters better than me, my dad allowed it. Neglected, abused, now they wonder why I don't want any women like them
The name "Taka" isn't actually canon, the A tale of true brothers book isn't canon the canon backstory was from the Lion Guard his name was confirmed to be Askari named after the first leader of the Lion Guard which... IS CANON. Mufasa means "King" in swahili, Askari on the other hand actually means soldier, he was named to protect his big brother ar the leader of the guard.
Then who was the cub at the very end of the original movie Rafiki walked up and presented to all of the Pridelands that had black ears whereas in the sequel, Kiara as a baby had no black on her ears when Nala carried her in her mouth?
@@RedPandaGirl002 The baby at the end of the first Lion King was called Fluffy as a place holder, when Lion King first came out Disney didn't actually think the movie would be successful neither did anyone think it would be worthy of sequel. However, when they did make the sequel the cub was later named and confirmed to be Kiara.
@@RedPandaGirl002 Kiaras older brother who died
@@lexussykes You mean, Kopa? Yes, I am aware of that. I was just asking the person and testing their knowledge of who the cub was at the end. (
Well the book isn't canon anymore but it used to be before the lion guard came along, but saying it was a snake is just weird cause it doesn't really fit to how it looks. A snake bite wouldn't look like that right? Plus he'd be blind if that was the case since snakes are poisonous, or some are.
Technically Scar should have been king since black maned lions are stronger then golden mane lions and lions can have a Coalition of two or three brothers who can rule the land even tho one would be alpha to have rights to mate.
Dude scar should not have been king no!
@@FantasticFawnleap lions irl favor ones with black manes. The dark coloration comes from testosterone and the more successful and confident a lion is, the more testosterone it has and therefore the darker its mane is, and other lions know this. So the other lions favor lions with darker manes
@@issnake1109 dude look at scar he can’t make strong offspring And he can’t defend the pride either so no he should NOT have been king!
@@FantasticFawnleap and? I’m not saying that Scar should have been king, I’m just agreeing with the other person that in real life, in nature, the dark maned lions are usually the ones that females go for
@@issnake1109 ..
Also in the lion guard there is a. Different backstory for how he got his scar but when I get the chance I am gonna take a look at a tale if two brothers because that seems really important
Just a quick note, Taka can also mean to want in Swahili. Still not great though.
You're right
Depends on the context given@@mecahhannah
Fun fact, the darker haired lion would be considered the more masculine out of the two lions. All the females would have wanted scar and not mufsa in real life lol.
lolll
True but mufasa is stronger right?
I think ahadi was jealous of scars dark dark hair and didn’t want him to get attention
0:17 KING AHADDIS FACE WHILE SLAPPING SCAR 😂
Fr, he looks so emotionless and frozen 💀
Scar being a dark mane lion was probably seen as a threat even by his own father.
i feel pity for scar
😭
The new movie says this is wrong in so many ways 😂
This is the original version
Yh new one has mufasa being a stray
someone on deviantart actually made a insanely good comic series of how scar and mufasa grew up. it makes so much sense as well.
My parents treat me horribly compared to my siblings. I can very much relate to Scar. And I feel so bad for him.
What do I think...it is taking an obviously established evil fictional character who initially had no real back story then creating a endless stream of what if's to try to paint him as possibly a victim. Yet you see in the main movie that he murders the king and then instead of justly ruling he is a tyrant.
The only way any prior speculative stories can be made to set him as possibly just a abused victim who went for revenge is if the initial part of the story were completly altered. He would have at least tried to make the kingdom function to some degree otherwise but it plainly states he stripped the land dry purposly.
Many people not so well mentally were victims of some sort at some point in their lives.
Booth can be true at the same time. Even in the first movie we see how Mufassa treats him, constsntly putting his physical advantage over him. Dominating and in a sense even unessrsarily "demasculating" Scar. His Name is also changed after his injury he carries in his face, and even then kinda gives us a reason for all the resentment and why he became this ruthless and evil.
His downfall booth tied to the Hyenas and the lack of love he inspired in his subjects. So adding some more background isn't the problem. You just gotta learn that you can acknowledge evil and the origin why. No one is born evil. But they still get judged for it all the same.
@@TrafalgarWaterDLaw-dl5cm I do not dissagree with your reasoning but choosing to become a monster because of the abusers around oneself is not the answer.
While a child has no way of removing themselves from their abusers on their own they can still choose not to give into the liars whispers. Eventually all individuals must accept that they can not co-exists around those that refuse to accept them. That they must remove themselves stop wasting their love on those monsters and foster relations with more ginuine individuals.
Yes there will be slander and other means used to turn the abused into monsters but that is what the abusers want. It gives them an excuse to destroy the abused person or to make anything they speak about seem a lie. It is simply a game psycologicly that they use to try to destroy the witness.
In the end one must choose to become spiritually awaked or to give in to the hate. Most give in to hate and seek revenge. Not knowing they only reienforce the abusive monsters labling of them to all those around. What they can not see is that there is a whole world outside of their tiny existance and that eventually they will meet others who are not wolves in sheeps clothes.
My comment is about how the original character must have alterations made to his disposition in order for origin stories like these to fit in. But you cannot go about changing the narative to suit ones own agenda. Truth is truth and lies are lies. Half truthes are just manipulations of reality. If they truely wish to make these new origin stories make sense they must go back to the original material and make a alternative version from scars perspective and use his offscreen time to show another side of him. Until then all these what ifs are meaningless what ifs.
He was literally named Trash.
If you believe the new movie that's about to come out which is more Canon than the books because it's on screen, it seems like you're correct that the scar was not his original name but also that they are technically not blood there at all, no blood relation. In fact Mufasa isn't even a royal blood and it actually explains why scar can't stand him so much because he basically usurped the throne.
Sadly novel and lion guard are not canon, well maybe in their universe. In live action one it was said that mufasa was an orphan and taka being next in line
To me I feel bad for scar getting called trash by his dad…
Correct
As kids we saw him as a monster but now I can understand his pain😖
I remember that people said to the youth of Hannibal Lecter, that monsters are not born that way, they are created during life.
There's always more to the story 🥲
Scar getting a redemption arc would be rather cool to see I can imagine Simba Kovu and Kiara Shenzi Banzai Ed and the Hyenas discovering the truth about Simba's grandfather and I can imagine Simba now hating his grandfather more than Scar especially Shenzi Banzai and Ed becoming allies and friends to Simba would be awesome too I like Hyenas.
I especially like The Hyena Trio.
Poor Scar; living in the shadow of his brother, to be abused by his father. MAAAAN no wonder my bro fell to the wayside. Favoritism never ends well and adding abuse only makes it 100 times worse.
The _Real_ Villain was Ahadi the whole time! (And all bc their fathers wife/mate cheated, obviously and Scar was the result)
😢 sad
𝑊𝐴𝐼𝑇 𝑈𝑅𝑈 𝐶𝐻𝐸𝐴𝑇𝐸𝐷 𝑂𝑁 𝐴𝐻𝐴𝐷𝐼-
@@IorasAcrotory yeeep. :-L (and Scar/Taka got punished instead of her)
@@sweetcherry7759 nope 😱😂
@@xxxnarurto5747
If The Lion King gotten another movie I can see Simba Shenzi Banzai Ed and the Hyenas becoming allies especially with Shenzi telling Simba about his grandfather and how bad and evil his grandfather was to his uncle I'm imagining Simba hating his grandfather more than his Uncle Scar especially after finding out the truth and Shenzi telling him his grandfather is the reason why she and her family are forced to live in The Elephant Graveyard.
This is the reason why i love anime such as Dragonball z in the show there are a few villains with a back story but there are also villains who are evil because they are evil like frieza and it works
4:01 i mean i cant blame ahadi for it
The thumbnail got me
As a kid, I was the youngest brother out of two, AND WITH AUTISM, so it was sad my parents had more favoritism for my older brother than they did for me, that is if anyone's familiar with autism, and well enough to understand it decently.
Okay just for clarity Is it you That is autistic or your brother ? or both of you?
Scar would have been evil regardless because he wasn’t as strong as mufasa but felt like he was smarter…He was gonna want to be king no matter what
Wrong. If it wasn't for his father, he wouldn't be evil.
I can’t wait until the new Mufasa movie is coming out in December and I can’t wait to see if his father actually treated scar like you said
But in that movie they are not actually brothers. Mufasa is adopted and earns the right to rule so there is a reason for Scar to hate Mufasa. Scar (named Taka in the trailer) rescued him and lost his future crown for it.
When I look at this story I think of Gods of Egypt when the Sun God RA declared Unitis his first son King of Egypt while his second son Seth ruled the deserts leaving him nothing and was denied a son while Seth was married to Goddess Memphis
It's either that or What if Scar raised Simba.
I know the pain of scar 😢
Tbh i think skar got his evilness from being mistreated 😢
I’d go with the lion guard explanation of how scar got his scar since in that episode scar does explain that story himself
I wonder how Ahadi would have treated Kion after he got his scar.
Even worse!!
Who came here from the newest mufasa trailer :-
I like how the mufasa movie kind of used inspiration from the book for how scar got the scar. Yes, i know it’s not directly a buffalo stampede or anything but the scar was given to taka due to his actions caused by jealousy. i like to think the tale of two brothers is canon to the animated series and the live action remake has their own origin. they’re both basically the same thing tho although i do like the live action one more.
Too bad disney retcon this story. I'd prefer this story more than the movie that came out
you can consider this story canon to the animated series, the live action remakes are set in a different universe so a different origin for the characters isn’t impossible
Cgi movie trash
Guys Mufasa was a great father right? What if he had two sons, would he act like his father by praising one of them and break down the other or would he treat them both equally.
Simba in the Lion Guard certainly showed favortism towards his cubs. (Although I take Simba's personality in that series with a grain of salt since his movie version had a totally different personality).
@@CynderSpirit You are right, his personality does change, but maybe he matured from a young ruler to becoming a father of two and king of the Pride lands. There was a large time skip.
He should have treated them both equally the same
They should animate this giving the road Disney is on
❤ Awesome as always thanks
New movie throws all of this away
Nice video.
If they do address the relationship in the upcoming special, I think it would actually work if this is how they approach the issue.
To coin a phrase from a friend of mine "the best kind of villainy is the kind when the villain is perfectly within their rights to be upset, but go about it in all the wrong ways."
Hades and Maleficent(both incarnations) are prime examples, however 2014 Maleficent realizes her mistake, and does everything she can to rectify it.
This can also be seen in other media like X-Men with Magneto, or Batman: the animated series with Mr. Freeze.
Then there's alsoThor from 2011, which runs a bit similar yet differently.
I think it would be interesting to have this be the reason why Scar was evil, and the icing on the cake...Ahadi created his own Frankenstein.
Who's here after new Mufasa Movie has been announced?
0:49 Well, that's nice...
Weird tho, because the lion guard said scar was scarred by a snake with a venom that turned him evil. That in a series that explained why kion was not in lion king 2
Mufasa is good and scar is evil
❤❤❤
You better believe it, yes! God bless you and your family, Ave Maria and Viva Cristo Rey
I think the scapegoating cycle makes a villain at times. Looks like those who were the heroes were actually villains. Scar was the hero all along
King Ahadi sounds like a two faced father he loved muffusa more than he did scar muffusa was his father favorite child scar should have been treated no different for crying out loud that's your son and saying scar isn't fit to be king also being jealous of his brother that's what sets him to be evil 😈 in the future lion King
Correct its sad
Nice video very good and entertaining.😁
Now I understand Scar....
Man, I wish this was story for the new Mufasa movie and instead they decided to not use this. The trailer shows they are completely ignoring that this novel exists.
Taka doesn’t immediately mean trash in Swahili, taka means want, that is the first thing one will think of when you mention taka, takataka is the Swahili word trash, taka is like slang only used in some very specific regions. Swahili has such many words where when you join two of the same words the meaning completely changes like “Bara” which means Ocean but when you add another “bara” to the word for it to become “barabara” it then means road.
Scar looks more like ahadi than mufasa
Nice theory and story. I that's just the way it is on how Scar came to be.
Disney should’ve stuck to the original story instead that hot garbage of a live action movie
So True
Wooo I always new that scar was scared cause they did the same to kovu when he was a cub by grooming him for evil
In the "A Tale of Two Brothers" origin story, You're right that Ahadi could have reassured Taka that the three of them would go on a hunt as soon as possible. Still, as for the rest of the story, it seems that the only reason Ahadi's favoring Mufasa and diminishing Taka is that Mufasa really does understand kingly duties and Taka's a spoiled brat.
Word is mufusa was a an orphan and wasn’t even the blood son
He does realize they already explained how he got his scar
Almost named that boy Kaka, would’ve been worse 😭
Scar: What i am ?
Ahadi: You are my son
Scar: TELL ME !!!
During the new movie we see that Mufasa was a adopted orphan and scar (Taka) was the son of Obasi and scar was supposed to be the king after obasi
Whats even sadder is scar seems like hes more sore or old than mufasa wich mean he probably just gave up on life after his past 😢
In the new mufasa movie trailer it looks like disney changed the story to where mufasa was not scars "blood brother" and ahadi seems like a good father in the trailer so i guess we just have to wait
Ahadi might give Odin and Thanos a run for their money
Now I want to find out more about Scar's back story
Ahadi and Scar resembles so much
I always think rare people are genuine born evil, but from reality most cases is just poor treatmeant.
We need a prequel
Why at a few points is his scar on the other side of his face?
Even so scar committed the sin of killing his brother for the actions of his dad did and that is where he went wrong but I digress that muffasa could have done more as well but did not
I sorta feel bad for poor scar 😅🦁🦁
mufasa was adopted
This was 9 months ago
This gave me Thor and Loki vibes
in mufasa the lion king Mufasa is not his brother so they changed some things
Hi, as a Swahili speaker I’d like to correct you: taka means take not trash (this isn’t hate I just wanted to correct you)
If their father was a king, why does the new Mufasa trailer make it seem like Mufasa has no royal blood at the beginning?
funny thing is lions with a darker mane are generally more dominate then lions with the lighter manes, so in succession i feel Scar would have been the more desirable choice over Mufasa but the malnourishment and the fact that animals usually abandon the sicker or less healthy of the litter, and that Mufasa was the first born, would end up making him less of a choice. knowing he was the lesser in his fathers eyes would have lead to Scar being the Lion we know him to be.
December 29th 2024. Here after watching MUFASA. Just eta he’s a deleted scenes video from Lion King. Now I’m watching random Lion King videos
I can't wait mufasa the lion king 2024
You will be disappointed 😂
He will die and is specicist towards hyenas.. The end :)
Me neither
I’m so excited ❤
This is why you don’t pick a favorite child and snub the other
I never in my lifetime thought i'd feel bad for scar 😅
Most male lions only keep one son around in the first place so scar was lucky to still be there?
BRUH THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN WAY BETTER
True
In 2025 Ahadi is not his father and Uru is not his mother and he loved taka more then mufasa mufasa was adopted pride rock did not exist and scar did not get scratched by his father.
I think that made him succeptable to villiany. There could have been other influence like the hyenas who lived seperate from the kingdom or the outlanders remember until Simba told Kovu he never understood what happened with scar as told by simba. They have different perspectives, really all I know is it's not natural for lions to eat mice for lunch. I don't think Simba was any help at all. Ultimately it wasn't good for Mufasa neither as it gave him a hidden enemy and someone who was determined to take his life in the end. Ahadis favoritism toward Mufasa, him embracing it was a lot driving the uumph of his decline. Sometimes it is important we don't neglect one for because that breeds animosity it is bad parenting. The trouble is I am willing to bet that Mufasa was entirely blindsided by the whole thing but I think too that maybe it could have been different if they banned together because well they were the next generation. Scar was probably thinking "He could have sticked up for me to daddy but he chose not to, why did he have to choose not to and this made him look for other things Ahadi did wrong so he could find fault in his rule. He seeked and found from the hyenas to Zira and everything in between. That angered him and made him think that his uncle was right in what he was talking about with the royal family.
But the live action says mufasa was adopted after scar saved his life,if so than that was messed up how the king favored his adopted son more than his own son
That’s part of the reason the movie failed. The original books Taka was abused and a rejection to his family except Mufasa whom for some reason never tried to cheer him up
The Lion King the tales of the two Brothers shoud've been the Mufasa movie. What I saw ruined many characters
exactly mufasa is just weak and senseless on many levels
That is what I thought the movie was gonna be 😭