We do not recommend to put any expensive electro-optics on the scar. If you really want to get into the clip-on game then we would absolutely recommend to reevaluate your host with something like a SR-25. Scars kill virtually everything, it just depends how long it takes.
@@jacklavelle1716 This hasn’t been proven yet, but yes the NRCH SCARs will have *slightly* less mass slamming forward. But the BCG is still large and heavy.
The main problem with SCARs beating optics to death isn't just the high mass of the BCG, but mainly it's the shape of the receiver and its harmonics. It's open on the bottom, shaped like an upside down U. That's the problem. Until they totally redesign the SCAR receiver until it's basically an ACR in that regard, it's going to have this problem.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
can they handle SCAR-17 recoil?
We do not recommend to put any expensive electro-optics on the scar. If you really want to get into the clip-on game then we would absolutely recommend to reevaluate your host with something like a SR-25. Scars kill virtually everything, it just depends how long it takes.
Good question
I wil add that if you manage to switch your scar with a newer NRCH version you’d be good.
@@jacklavelle1716 This hasn’t been proven yet, but yes the NRCH SCARs will have *slightly* less mass slamming forward. But the BCG is still large and heavy.
The main problem with SCARs beating optics to death isn't just the high mass of the BCG, but mainly it's the shape of the receiver and its harmonics. It's open on the bottom, shaped like an upside down U. That's the problem. Until they totally redesign the SCAR receiver until it's basically an ACR in that regard, it's going to have this problem.
How heavy?