#3 0:50 OH PLEASE! The red car was slowing down due to traffic either stopped or slowing ahead. Their actions prevented a chain collision. The white SUV was speeding and not paying full time and attention. In situations like this when traffic is has to slow down quickly, I hit my flashers to "wake people up" as I brake. ALSO, look at #5 1:26.
Agreed on all points, the latter especially at night. I’ve been at the back of stopped traffic (due to a fatal accident ahead), witnessed a secondary injury crash (due to a drunk driver) and had several close calls with tertiary crashes from people not paying attention. If I see traffic stopped or significantly slowed ahead, I tap my brakes both to avoid the brakes locking, but to make the brake lights flash to draw attention to them.
Sorry for the re-uploading the video! I needed to removed the no.17 clip from the earlier version! It was too hard for the RUclips and I got a community guideline strike 😥
I mean, it makes sense..... But also, its an educational video that teaches bikers that ripping past stopped vehicles, while on the shoulder, is gonna require them to complete a lesson on Physics.... Or as its more commonly known, FAFO....
@@entarr2604Or just not post them and leave them for the motorcycle channels that have a little more flexibility when it comes to motorcycle crashes. I believe their community guidelines are a little different.
0:50 "increased chances of being hit" that's only assuming literally everyone behind her isnt paying attention, she didnt jam on the brakes, but it's clear the whole freeway was slowing down. Acura driver at fault 100000%
2:55 Everett, WA, Highway 99 south of Airport Rd. People drive on that shoulder all the time, as they want to turn right on Airport Rd. and the traffic at the light is well backed up, sometimes even a quarter mile. Airport Rd. comes from the Boeing factory and the Paine Field commercial airport. There are signs saying not to drive on the shoulder, but they are routinely ignored. No matter where you are, that left turn across traffic with one lane stopped to let you in is almost always a bad idea.
6:33 I’m the last person to say that an indicator gives someone the right of way, and I still stand by that here. The Buick had no right to enter your lane when you were occupying it. With that said, they did have their indicator on which made it pretty clear what they MIGHT end up doing. A little foresight would tell you “Oh, maybe I should let them in just in case they risk me and my 2-year old anyways.”
Saw the same video on another channel, with audio. Cammer sped up as soon as the signal came on. Agree, signal does not convey right of way, but the slightest bit of defensive driving on the part of the cammer would have gone a long way.
Defensive driving is such a great skill because you could be right, and totally have right of way, or you could stay safe and alive. As they say, the graveyard is full of people who had the right of way.
#15 4:48. I came close to being like the dark colored sedan in the right lane. Am I reading this video right? You are approaching a slower car. You plan a passing move. You check your side mirrors. No one is in the left lane at that time. All cars seemed to be well back. But what you didn't notice was that one speeding vehicle from behind closing fast. When you last looked a couple seconds ago that left lane was clear. Now it's occupied. Fortuity for me I checked again and moved away quickly. I'm sure many of you have looked before you made a driving move/change and it looked clear. Then it seems out of no where, it all changes.
Its crazy the amount of people stopped at an intersection with clear line of sight of both directions of travel will wait until there is a vehicle nearby before pulling out.the red Buick was stopped for a good time before deciding to go just as cross traffic got green.
#7 (2:00) That oblivious driver hitting you is a bummer, but on the bright side, you probably saved the pedestrian who was crossing on the left from getting run over.
6:34 #20. Cammer ran themselves off the road. That blinker was on long enough to know they needed to come over and cammer decided to close the gap. While legally the other car would have been at fault, cammer is just a dick and made the situation unsafe for themselves.
2:25 Unless further down the road outside of this clip you got beside them or ahead of them, then I could understand them not looking at you. If you stayed behind them then it's understandable. Did you want the to be like the exorcist and their head to spin around facing backwards?
If the FedEx driver at @3:00 had not stopped to be kind and had continued driving as they should, then there wouldn't have been a blind spot for the turning vehicle. And they stopped for just them and another car. If they hadn't stopped, there wouldn't have been much traffic for the red car to wait for anyway. Such a complete mess, stop stopping to be nice - stop because you need to stop.
I hate this mentality "stop being nice" or "stop being polite". That's what's wrong with our society already. How about the person shouldn't be passing on the shoulder. The cammer just said they didn't want to wait for the turning lane coming up at the light. Everyone is always in a rush to get there a few seconds faster🙄 when they could've waited. Both lanes of traffic were stopped for the individual to turn. Red car should've proceeded with more caution but SUV was wrong for passing on the shoulder.
@shawneeandcrew it was a turn lane, not the shoulder, so they could have been aiming to turn a little further down the lane. And cammer says their opinion, not facts. And I was saying had the FedEx truck not been being nice needlessly - they could have pulled forwards and been out of the way and there would have been clearance for the red car to turn. All they did was create a blindspot which likely contributed to the accident more than anything else.
@@MrBattlecharge so since the cammer was directly at the scene I'm going to take their word that it was still the shoulder and not the turning lane. You are watching a clip like I am and you're saying that they are stating their opinion and not facts? Were you there as well to know this as fact? I stand by what I said earlier.
@@shawneeandcrew ... you can see the turn lane. Yes, I trust my eyes over what the cammer says. You can see the broken white lines indicating a third lane.
@@MrBattlecharge They don't paint thick solid white lines across turn lanes (immediately prior to the lot entrance). And those "broken" lines are just worn-out paint - that's why they don't have the white buttons like the actual lane lines do.
That's just one small section of that road over a creek with small towns on either side that necessitate a slower speed limit if you look on google maps. It looks like a quarter mile of country road with towns at either end.
Why do cammers feel the need to include that their children were with them during minor traffic incidents? Do you think the person would have acted differently had they known you had a kid? Just makes you sound like a damn victim over the tiniest inconvenience.
Hello, my friend, I was following you when the number of your followers was about five thousand. I saw your educational content, because of your clips, I bought a 360-degree dash camera, and it saved me from people who tried to fabricate a lie, and the camera people helped them. Thank you very much and I wish you more success to reach the world
Yep, one time, back in the day before I had a dashcam, I got screwed by someone that backed directly in to me and said I rear-ended them. Since then, I got dual-channel (front and rear) dashcams for myself, the wife's car, and even my daughter's car... and in the years since, we have had no less than (4) other people try to lie about fault of an accident. Dashcam video has saved us a lot of hassle every time and every one was found to be the other driver's fault. More than worth the $$
#3 - The red car didn't "stop early," they were slowing down because traffic in front of them was stopping. They just chose to do it correctly and not slam on their brakes at the last second. If you think they had any responsibility for that or did anything wrong, you're an idiot. #20 - Cammer sees that a person ahead of them is signaling to change lanes, but decides that it's better to not just ease off the gas and give them a little space to change lanes. A signal doesn't give immediate right of way, however it does tell you what the intent is, and the expectation of other drivers according to the law in any state is that you allow that person to make a safe lane change if they are able to do so, as opposed to preventing one. By allowing people to make safe lane changes, we keep traffic flowing smoothly. By preventing them, a whole lane has to stop.
You really can't tell from the video how hard the red car hit their brakes, it looks like they slowed down pretty fast. Not much of an excuse for the white truck, but I've learned if I'm going to unexpectedly brake on an interstate to at least flash my brakes a couple of times to get the attention of the drivers behind. It's saved me a rear-ender more than once in heavy traffic.
3:41 is this normal to get pulled over for or was the cop just bored? I have never seen someone get pulled over for this. If its normal where are the cops to stop the ones doing it to me? lol. Where I live, cops tailgate people and me while in traffic (not in trouble, no where to go - just driving). Its only okay when they do it?
@@NaturalStateTransparency I looked it up and its a law in Iowa but I just never seen it happen, so it's a surprise for me. The police are around but they don't do anything. I guess they aren't just as proactive here, that's a shame.
Some sloppy editing here. For example with the bike rider waiting at the lights and doing a burnout while he was stationary. You missed out the next and best bit where he quickly got a flat tyre! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 Also a number of repeat clips.
I highly recommend folks resist the sudden urge to veer sharply to avoid a car suddenly entering your land. Brake but never veer sharply as first instinct. Brake using ABS, only after steer around obstacles.
1:03 No. Red car slowed and kept a safe, but reasonable, distance from cars in front. White car was not paying attention and/or going too fast. White car’s fault, full stop.
0:45 - I'm thinking the red car slowed down to let the cammer onto the freeway. This would be stupid. I wonder if the cammer did anything to make the red car driver think they would merge onto the freeway too soon.
Something I've summed up from these videos where the cammer has reached out to the Police to share the video, the cops really don't give a shit, do they? That is some BS.
look up kei cars/trucks/vans. People like to import them from Japan. Once the vehicles are older than 25 years from date of manufacture you can import them into the USA. People are really excited for R34 GT-R skylines which can be imported to USA starting next year.
#3 the commentary stating the red car stopping early caused the crash… 1. Red car (Nissan Altima) saved herself the grief of being catapulted into the vehicles already slowing to a crawl in front of her. Know the difference between someone driving obnoxiously slow, and keeping a safe distance. I don’t even pull all the way up behind the next vehicle at traffic lights anymore. I’m not taking the chance of the blood sucking insurance company trying to pin ANY percent chance of fault on me because the person behind was dicking around and not paying attention. Most of us are driving at least 3k plus pounds of metal and plastic around, people. Remember that.
#10 2:55 What? I understand how the collision happened. But why are there what looks like white parking stripes along the curb across that right lane? There is even a stripe right in front of the turn in to the place.
1:39 I would say both cars behind guy with dashcam is at fault black sedan failed to leave a safe distance between him and the car in front and the car not paying attention at all
California code 21703 - The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway. Since they were stopped, I don't think there will be much argument to be made that they were not following too closely. How close do you park in parking lots? Pretty damn close, same thing in stop and go highway traffic. You cannot fault the black car.
#23 The other driver didn't do anything wrong. He was legally allowed to pass and had plenty of room. If you were really worried about how close it was you could have slowed, but didnt.
If you think that pass was in any way appropriate, you are part of the problem. The Toyota got back in their own lane only 1 second before passing the cammer.
@@dwalmop2 Oh come on, the cammer didn't slow down a single bit. If he was that worried about a head on collision he certainly did nothing to avoid it. If he couldn't see the pass he shouldn't be driving.
@@spamlessaccount Yet he didnt slow down. I have seen much worse pass attempts even on curves, this guy passed in a legal zone on a "flat" straight away and there was room. I suppose he couldnt have waited until there was nobody coming for miles. /shrug. I am not going to knock the guy when the cammer made no attempt to slow despite his faux concern.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 257 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Orf1U4Vqflg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 257 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Best of Monthly Car Crash Compilation [August, 2024]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z9hjrq8hxDs/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 286 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZBxDOa1Wmus/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 297 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/FnavwQg5WwkNkS6r8
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
*👉Car Crash Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/rclMPEkpkv8/видео.html
*👉Car Crash Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/mZTrLdc9xb0/видео.html
*👉Car Crash Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/LriUGbijw-Q/видео.html
*👉Car Crash Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/fwlWI9vWlyo/видео.html
*👉Car Crash Compilation :*ruclips.net/video/9f0dpsnWy_g/видео.html
#3 0:50 OH PLEASE! The red car was slowing down due to traffic either stopped or slowing ahead. Their actions prevented a chain collision. The white SUV was speeding and not paying full time and attention. In situations like this when traffic is has to slow down quickly, I hit my flashers to "wake people up" as I brake. ALSO, look at #5 1:26.
Agreed on all points, the latter especially at night. I’ve been at the back of stopped traffic (due to a fatal accident ahead), witnessed a secondary injury crash (due to a drunk driver) and had several close calls with tertiary crashes from people not paying attention.
If I see traffic stopped or significantly slowed ahead, I tap my brakes both to avoid the brakes locking, but to make the brake lights flash to draw attention to them.
Sorry for the re-uploading the video! I needed to removed the no.17 clip from the earlier version! It was too hard for the RUclips and I got a community guideline strike 😥
Rumble!
I mean, it makes sense..... But also, its an educational video that teaches bikers that ripping past stopped vehicles, while on the shoulder, is gonna require them to complete a lesson on Physics.... Or as its more commonly known, FAFO....
I know no one wants censoring, but going forward, if you have any motorcycle clips, you may want to just put a big blurred spot covering it
FailArmy would have a clip like that & nothing would happen to them.
@@entarr2604Or just not post them and leave them for the motorcycle channels that have a little more flexibility when it comes to motorcycle crashes. I believe their community guidelines are a little different.
0:50 "increased chances of being hit" that's only assuming literally everyone behind her isnt paying attention, she didnt jam on the brakes, but it's clear the whole freeway was slowing down. Acura driver at fault 100000%
2:55 Everett, WA, Highway 99 south of Airport Rd. People drive on that shoulder all the time, as they want to turn right on Airport Rd. and the traffic at the light is well backed up, sometimes even a quarter mile. Airport Rd. comes from the Boeing factory and the Paine Field commercial airport. There are signs saying not to drive on the shoulder, but they are routinely ignored.
No matter where you are, that left turn across traffic with one lane stopped to let you in is almost always a bad idea.
Why do designers keep putting side mirrors on cars - it’s not like anyone seems to use them.
Blinkers too! It’s just a pesky extra knob 😂🤦🏻♀️
They deff don't check their blind spots either
I used the side mirrors the most! They show you your blind spots
6:33 I’m the last person to say that an indicator gives someone the right of way, and I still stand by that here. The Buick had no right to enter your lane when you were occupying it. With that said, they did have their indicator on which made it pretty clear what they MIGHT end up doing. A little foresight would tell you “Oh, maybe I should let them in just in case they risk me and my 2-year old anyways.”
Saw the same video on another channel, with audio. Cammer sped up as soon as the signal came on. Agree, signal does not convey right of way, but the slightest bit of defensive driving on the part of the cammer would have gone a long way.
Defensive driving is such a great skill because you could be right, and totally have right of way, or you could stay safe and alive.
As they say, the graveyard is full of people who had the right of way.
#15 4:48. I came close to being like the dark colored sedan in the right lane. Am I reading this video right? You are approaching a slower car. You plan a passing move. You check your side mirrors. No one is in the left lane at that time. All cars seemed to be well back. But what you didn't notice was that one speeding vehicle from behind closing fast. When you last looked a couple seconds ago that left lane was clear. Now it's occupied. Fortuity for me I checked again and moved away quickly.
I'm sure many of you have looked before you made a driving move/change and it looked clear. Then it seems out of no where, it all changes.
Its crazy the amount of people stopped at an intersection with clear line of sight of both directions of travel will wait until there is a vehicle nearby before pulling out.the red Buick was stopped for a good time before deciding to go just as cross traffic got green.
#18 I thought in another channel they showed that the biker dude made his tire flat from doing that.. that was kinda the key part of the video.
Karma!!
#7 (2:00) That oblivious driver hitting you is a bummer, but on the bright side, you probably saved the pedestrian who was crossing on the left from getting run over.
3:00 dont stop to let someone turn
6:34 #20. Cammer ran themselves off the road. That blinker was on long enough to know they needed to come over and cammer decided to close the gap. While legally the other car would have been at fault, cammer is just a dick and made the situation unsafe for themselves.
Those bikers have more money than sense, wrecking tires for a show like that guy at 5:25.
1:29, right before the car rear-ends him, the voice on the radio says, "Get out of the way"! 😆
2:25 Unless further down the road outside of this clip you got beside them or ahead of them, then I could understand them not looking at you. If you stayed behind them then it's understandable. Did you want the to be like the exorcist and their head to spin around facing backwards?
#25 - buddy that was maybe 50 kmh no way are we looking at 50 mph
If the FedEx driver at @3:00 had not stopped to be kind and had continued driving as they should, then there wouldn't have been a blind spot for the turning vehicle. And they stopped for just them and another car. If they hadn't stopped, there wouldn't have been much traffic for the red car to wait for anyway. Such a complete mess, stop stopping to be nice - stop because you need to stop.
I hate this mentality "stop being nice" or "stop being polite". That's what's wrong with our society already. How about the person shouldn't be passing on the shoulder. The cammer just said they didn't want to wait for the turning lane coming up at the light. Everyone is always in a rush to get there a few seconds faster🙄 when they could've waited. Both lanes of traffic were stopped for the individual to turn. Red car should've proceeded with more caution but SUV was wrong for passing on the shoulder.
@shawneeandcrew it was a turn lane, not the shoulder, so they could have been aiming to turn a little further down the lane. And cammer says their opinion, not facts. And I was saying had the FedEx truck not been being nice needlessly - they could have pulled forwards and been out of the way and there would have been clearance for the red car to turn. All they did was create a blindspot which likely contributed to the accident more than anything else.
@@MrBattlecharge so since the cammer was directly at the scene I'm going to take their word that it was still the shoulder and not the turning lane. You are watching a clip like I am and you're saying that they are stating their opinion and not facts? Were you there as well to know this as fact? I stand by what I said earlier.
@@shawneeandcrew ... you can see the turn lane. Yes, I trust my eyes over what the cammer says. You can see the broken white lines indicating a third lane.
@@MrBattlecharge They don't paint thick solid white lines across turn lanes (immediately prior to the lot entrance). And those "broken" lines are just worn-out paint - that's why they don't have the white buttons like the actual lane lines do.
3:32 Legit question: why is that road speed limit 35? Looks like it should be 50, at least....
That's just one small section of that road over a creek with small towns on either side that necessitate a slower speed limit if you look on google maps. It looks like a quarter mile of country road with towns at either end.
Why do cammers feel the need to include that their children were with them during minor traffic incidents? Do you think the person would have acted differently had they known you had a kid? Just makes you sound like a damn victim over the tiniest inconvenience.
"I let someone cum in me so I deserve special treatment"
Keeping cum as a pet does something to already emotional humans 😂
Hello, my friend, I was following you when the number of your followers was about five thousand. I saw your educational content, because of your clips, I bought a 360-degree dash camera, and it saved me from people who tried to fabricate a lie, and the camera people helped them. Thank you very much and I wish you more success to reach the world
Yep, one time, back in the day before I had a dashcam, I got screwed by someone that backed directly in to me and said I rear-ended them.
Since then, I got dual-channel (front and rear) dashcams for myself, the wife's car, and even my daughter's car... and in the years since, we have had no less than (4) other people try to lie about fault of an accident. Dashcam video has saved us a lot of hassle every time and every one was found to be the other driver's fault. More than worth the $$
#3 - The red car didn't "stop early," they were slowing down because traffic in front of them was stopping. They just chose to do it correctly and not slam on their brakes at the last second. If you think they had any responsibility for that or did anything wrong, you're an idiot.
#20 - Cammer sees that a person ahead of them is signaling to change lanes, but decides that it's better to not just ease off the gas and give them a little space to change lanes. A signal doesn't give immediate right of way, however it does tell you what the intent is, and the expectation of other drivers according to the law in any state is that you allow that person to make a safe lane change if they are able to do so, as opposed to preventing one. By allowing people to make safe lane changes, we keep traffic flowing smoothly. By preventing them, a whole lane has to stop.
You really can't tell from the video how hard the red car hit their brakes, it looks like they slowed down pretty fast. Not much of an excuse for the white truck, but I've learned if I'm going to unexpectedly brake on an interstate to at least flash my brakes a couple of times to get the attention of the drivers behind. It's saved me a rear-ender more than once in heavy traffic.
#20 But muh rightz
3:41 is this normal to get pulled over for or was the cop just bored? I have never seen someone get pulled over for this. If its normal where are the cops to stop the ones doing it to me? lol. Where I live, cops tailgate people and me while in traffic (not in trouble, no where to go - just driving). Its only okay when they do it?
In Arkansas it's law: § 27-51-305. Following Too Closely. And Sherwood Police are proactive, so it comes as no surprise to me.
@@NaturalStateTransparency I looked it up and its a law in Iowa but I just never seen it happen, so it's a surprise for me. The police are around but they don't do anything. I guess they aren't just as proactive here, that's a shame.
Some sloppy editing here. For example with the bike rider waiting at the lights and doing a burnout while he was stationary. You missed out the next and best bit where he quickly got a flat tyre! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Also a number of repeat clips.
I highly recommend folks resist the sudden urge to veer sharply to avoid a car suddenly entering your land. Brake but never veer sharply as first instinct. Brake using ABS, only after steer around obstacles.
1:03
No. Red car slowed and kept a safe, but reasonable, distance from cars in front. White car was not paying attention and/or going too fast. White car’s fault, full stop.
0:45 - I'm thinking the red car slowed down to let the cammer onto the freeway.
This would be stupid.
I wonder if the cammer did anything to make the red car driver think they would merge onto the freeway too soon.
Something I've summed up from these videos where the cammer has reached out to the Police to share the video, the cops really don't give a shit, do they? That is some BS.
The revving motorcyclist ruined his tire for his effort!
Yeah I saw the video on another social media platform. The tire went flat and the cammer was having a good laugh.
Douche bugle is my new favorite term.
#20 THIS IS MY LANE AND I AND ONLY I DECIDES WHO IS WORTHY OF ENTERING IT
5:56 he gets a flat tire a little further down the road. Why did you leave that part out? 🤨
6:25. The lady wasent on the weight plate. It’s not right for the car to do that but I understand.
5:29 didnt show the best part: the bikes tire goes flat down the street.
Nobody else is going to ask what on earth that white van-thing is at 2:57?
It looks like a little Daewoo van. They’re not very common to see.
look up kei cars/trucks/vans. People like to import them from Japan. Once the vehicles are older than 25 years from date of manufacture you can import them into the USA. People are really excited for R34 GT-R skylines which can be imported to USA starting next year.
Mitsubishi Bravo
#3 the commentary stating the red car stopping early caused the crash… 1. Red car (Nissan Altima) saved herself the grief of being catapulted into the vehicles already slowing to a crawl in front of her. Know the difference between someone driving obnoxiously slow, and keeping a safe distance. I don’t even pull all the way up behind the next vehicle at traffic lights anymore. I’m not taking the chance of the blood sucking insurance company trying to pin ANY percent chance of fault on me because the person behind was dicking around and not paying attention. Most of us are driving at least 3k plus pounds of metal and plastic around, people. Remember that.
7:35: "Douchebugle?"🤔
7:25 "Douchebugle," that's going to join my personal lexicon. I wonder if the Sheriff's deputy noticed and did he do anything about it?
#10 2:55 What? I understand how the collision happened. But why are there what looks like white parking stripes along the curb across that right lane? There is even a stripe right in front of the turn in to the place.
First one was a dumb move, but he did use his signal. Its the ridiculous lower bumper turn signals.
why can't some people just go against a big brick wall!!
1:18 People failing at dual turn lanes never cease to make me laugh at how inept they are
5:31 Tire smoke smells really bad.
Love the smell, second best part of going to the track
Never drive next to "people". Nobody looks.
1:39 I would say both cars behind guy with dashcam is at fault black sedan failed to leave a safe distance between him and the car in front and the car not paying attention at all
California code 21703 - The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway. Since they were stopped, I don't think there will be much argument to be made that they were not following too closely. How close do you park in parking lots? Pretty damn close, same thing in stop and go highway traffic. You cannot fault the black car.
Great video!😸
1
#23 The other driver didn't do anything wrong. He was legally allowed to pass and had plenty of room. If you were really worried about how close it was you could have slowed, but didnt.
If you think that pass was in any way appropriate, you are part of the problem. The Toyota got back in their own lane only 1 second before passing the cammer.
@@dwalmop2 Oh come on, the cammer didn't slow down a single bit. If he was that worried about a head on collision he certainly did nothing to avoid it.
If he couldn't see the pass he shouldn't be driving.
@@MrPetej00 That's exactly the point - if you force oncoming traffic to have to slow down to avoid you, you're not making a safe pass.
@@spamlessaccount Yet he didnt slow down.
I have seen much worse pass attempts even on curves, this guy passed in a legal zone on a "flat" straight away and there was room. I suppose he couldnt have waited until there was nobody coming for miles. /shrug.
I am not going to knock the guy when the cammer made no attempt to slow despite his faux concern.
@@MrPetej00 again, the fact that you blame the cammer for not slowing down means *by definition* that you're wrong when you say "there was room".
"God Almighty", declares the atheist!
"Jesus Christ", bellows the atheist!
As a non practicing atheist, I approve this message. 😅