Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM lens review with samples
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 сен 2024
- It's been a while since I tested a zoom lens for digital SLRs, so here we have a fast standard zoom option for them - it's pretty nice.
Find it here (Amazon Affiliate link) (Be sure to get the right lens for your camera system):
geni.us/sigma2...
All pictures taken by me on Canon EOS R and Sony A7R II cameras.
Support me on Patreon! / christopherfrost
www.patreon.co...
Music: 'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 creativecommons....
![Baby Kia - GLOVES & DRACS (BLACK AF1s) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajm8LeB0qQk/mqdefault.jpg)
I am glad you decided to change the thumbnails. This one looks much better!
Glad you like them!
So what it boils down to if you're gonna chose between this and the Tamron is which way you want the zoom ring to turn.
Good point!! for many, it's deal breaking
The Tamron also has a focal length lock at 24mm.
@@smaakjeks Which in my experience is only useful for keeping the lens from extending while you're moving about. Same with the lock switch on my Sigma 150-600mm. A nice to have, but not something that'd make or break a purchase decision for me.
The weird thing is that I have an old 70-200 2.8 from sigma and the zoom ring turns the other way to this 24-70
@@zanbacak6051 Sigma occasionally does that. The iconic 18-35mm f1.8 turns the other way around, too. Must be something to do with keeping its size down.
Good review Chris as always. I’ve never placed great importance on softer images towards the edges. I suppose the sharper the better in a technical sense, but for most photographical purposes it’s not that big a deal. The reason is, most photographers place so much emphasis on using the edges to draw you towards the middle or one of the thirds which is where the main subject and focal point should be. Adding vignetting and blurring at the edges is quite common, and I would argue that too much sharpness at the edges is distracting for the majority of images (even landscapes). So all in all, a great technical review as always from a pixel peeping point of view (which is how all lens reviews should be based), but my main point is to people who get hung up on this kind of thing, perhaps shouldn’t.
Very well said!
Pixel-peepers will never be happy.
Same with people who constantly seek perfection in imperfect things.
I also don’t mind vignetting.
I add vignette in photos / videos.
Flares or other stuff is also silly to talk about, if you are a videomaker.
And “bokeh? Blurrier = better?
Most people don’t study films.
They don’t blur the hell out of a scene. They use (s)low apertures and MORE lights…
And when people start talking bout how many blades the aperture has, then it’s over.
LOOK AT FILMS, yeah even on Netflix.
Count the blades and sun-stars, while putting out videos that nobody watches 🤦🏻♂️
Particularly at f/2.8 , the background will be completely blown out anyway.
I agree. At f2.8 , unless your subject is in the very corner of the frame , the corners will be totally out of focus anyway .
Totally agree, you nailed it!!!@@WEHAVETHISDREAM
Good to know not to remove a lens while Image Stabilization is on
Wait why not
You really shouldn’t hotswap lenses you should always turn the camera off first
Why?
@@carlosbobbert862 like don't change the engine while it is on.
You’ve read my mind, I was just researching This lens today. Great work 👍🏻
We‘re using it as all day lens for our Canon DSLRs and BMPCC6K.
Earlier I owned the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L II, but it felt really plastic and for less price, better built quality and OS, I switched to the Sigma.
I am considering using this with a Bmpcc 4k and Metabones XL. Would love to hear your thoughts on it.
What about image quality compared to the canon? I’m i’m buying this lens today but if the canon image quality is better I may have to miss out on image stabilization
Could you please tell me what the image quality is like? I’m currently looking at buying the canon option but just been looking into sigma and an thinking this may be the better option.
Hey quick question. When you say I shouldn't "take the lens off the camera when Image Stabilization system is at work", do you mean I shouldn't take it off even with the camera powered off and the OS switch at "on"? Or do you mean when the camera is powered on and actively using the stabilization? Thank for your reviews man. I got the lens because of you!
It is important to pay attention to when the camera is 'ON'. When it is turned off, you, of course, can remove the lens safely.
I had it for Nikon and now have it for Sony A7riv, fantastic lens.
@Foto4Max it could be, there's a nikon to sony adaptor lol.
I thought my Tamron 24 to 70 2.8 G1 Amount adapted could handle the A7R2, but I found it a little soft at 2.8. I did get the Zeiss for the Amount adapted to my A7R2, which was a lot sharper than my Tamron, but the Tamron autofocused a lot faster than the Zeiss. That Sony A7Rm2 really punishes a lot of zoom lens previously considered sharp in the DSLR era. Really looking forward to getting the Tamron 28 to 70 2.8 G2 native to the E mount. Seems the next gen lens finally caught up with high resolution cameras.
Thank you again for a great review and comparison with the Tamron at the end Chris.
Excellent video 😮!
Have this lens, my all time favourite for sure!
Finally finally finally. Been waiting for this lens.
Hi Chris, thank you for the review.
At 07:58 did you change the focus or moved the camera when stopping down from f/2.8 to f/4.0?
If you didn't, then the lens shows a strong focus-shift at close range at 70mm, which is worth emphasizing.
Great review Chris - have a great day today. 😎😎😎
So you said never to remove the lens when the stabilizer is on... is that specific for this lens? or is a feature other or all stabilized lens have? Never before I heard you said that in other reviews.
Always make a habit of switching off the camera before changing lenses and you will have no problems. Some RUclipsrs don't do this, all manufacturers (AFAIK) recommend switching off power first.
@@edwinparker6732 My Rokinon doesn't mind.
;D
From what I've heard, it's a common rule for all lenses.
I need help with this. Is there a difference between this lens and the sigma 24-70mm EX Aspherical? The actual gold lettering on the lens is different than the DG HSM and it's also different from the DG EX you reviewed before and didn't like. And the price for it is less than the DG HSM but more than the DG EX on KEH, but I can hardly find any reviews for the EX Aspherical.😭 Someone help please 😭
Can someone explain to me how a lens, designed for DSLR, and have image stabilization is smaller than the Art lens designed for mirrorless? Wasnt the whole point that mirrorless lensed would be smaller?
The mirrorless lens is smaller and lighter as well?
yay finally! thank chris and keep safe and God bless!
I have the Tamron 24-70mm G2 and, while I do love the lens and the images I can get from it, I had to do a bit of autofocus calibration on it out of the box (using the Tamron Tap-In), as at 24mm f/2.8, it would not focus properly through the viewfinder. And when I set it up for calibration, I confirmed it was front-focusing at 24mm. But, strangely, it was back-focusing at 35mm and 50mm. Has anyone noticed anything similar with the Sigma version?
The performance in the corners is the reason why I got the Tamron G2, because I mostly use it at the wide angle and I needed the best performer at that focal lenght. It gets sharp at 70mm if you stop it down just to 3.2 (I also didn't trust SIgma's focusing accuracy on DSLR, frankly)
How do you change the aperture on a Sony A7III since it doesn't have an aperture ring?
Would their be any benefit to buy this over the 17-50mm if I have an aspc camera? (A6300)
i don't want to spend all my money on no lens but i do want to get me a 24-70mm for my 80d from canon but i want to know how good the picture quality is so please help me in picking in a great camera lens
Nice review as always, needless to say amazing channel. Are you planning on reviewing Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6 Di III RXD ?
Eventually, yes
Will i get same quality with canon 80D ?
Great video! Would you prefer this lens (which has more range) or the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 which has no image stabilization? Thanks!
Can do a comparison this lens with RF2470F2.8 in same camera body?
I want to see you review the new Tokina, ATX-i 11-20mm f2.8 CF
In my opinion, people with Nikon can buy the Tamron and people with Canon can buy the Sigma to avoid confusion of turning the zoom ring the wrong way.
I use both Tamron and Canon lenses. I never found the turning direction an issue.
Which lens do you prefer Tamron's 24-70mm g2 or this Sigma 24-70mm art
Hi Christopher, love your videos as always! 💕 For video would it be better to get the Canon version and adapt it to my Sony camera so I can use it on both systems or would I be better getting the Sony version without OS? Thanks 😊
I ordered mine and the focus ring feels stiffer than im used to, how does yours handle?
Hi Christopher,
I'm just discover your channel and I'm very new here.
I had nikon d7100 back 2014 for fashion fotography with Nikkor 24-70mm and still have it.
Now I have interest in Interior Photography.
What is you recommend Wide lens for shooting in indoor space and for fun in outdoor?
from Cheap to medium price but it also provide good detail and sharpnes.
Hope other read this can help me too.
Thankyouverymuch
I don't know so much about Nikon lenses. One option if you don't mind manual focus is the Venus 12mm f/2.8 Zero-D
@@christopherfrost Thank you very much Chris!
How is it holding today? I found one used for 270$ and am wondering if I should buy it.
270 usd would be a magnificent deal. 👌 Buy it!
Thank you Christopher. I learned so much from you. Does this lens work with Canon EOS 90D?
That’s what I’m getting it for. Just ordered.
@@hollyjostudios That's awesome! it would be really appreciated if you can post how it works with 90d when you get. I love sigma lens a lot but wonder if there's any problems with crop sensor camera. Thanks in advance!
Man, Sigma needs to make a new version of the 17-50 f3.8 for E-mount.
Hello, is this the one which is on Amazon (£1,078) from 2008? And is it only for mirrorless cameras? Or can I use it on my Canon Eos 90d (DSLR)
This lens is only about 3 years old, as I mentioned in the video
Crop lens?
is there like this lens for canon crop frame ?
What would be the equivalent in a Sony aps lens (sans adapter)? I'm looking for a zoom lens from 16mm-70mm.
Best option is the Sony 16-55 f/2.8
please compare this lens to canon 24 70 l ii
What's the difference between the DG to the DG DN?
Is the same perfomance in APSC?
Exellent review my friend
Might go with this Sigma and combine that with my metabones.
Could you recommend a ef mount zoom with great image quality but less focus breathing for video work? Thanks
The Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 'L' Mark 2 might be perfect for you although I didn't test its focus breathing at the time
So guys hear me out…
and someone educate me if I’m wrong…
Is it practical to put this on my A7IV with IBIS while running the lens IS? Would that make a stabilizing beast of a setup seeing other 24-70s aren’t stabilized?
Yes. Both systems differ greatly - lens vs sensor stabilization, and usually they work together well.
Wait so if IS is in but the camera is off, you still shouldn’t take off the lens until you turn off IS?
if the camera is off then the IS will not be active anyways, as there is nothing powering it. So yeah just turn your camera off first and itll be fine
Hi I am interested to buy my first fixed aperture zoom lens for portrait and events photoshoot, the 24-70mm f/2.8. I am not sure whether the sigma art or the tamron G2 but from different videos and forums I found out that the Tamron is better. My concern is that if in the nearby future, I will buy the 70-200mm, there might be an issue since the sigma sports is better than the tamron g2 lens (based on videos) and the two brands' lenses rotate differently. Please any suggestion based on experience if buying the Tamron 24-70mm and a Sigma 70-200mm lens will not effect my performance since they rotate differently. Also if based on experience, you saw that a particular brand is better than the other at these lenses. Thanks in advance
I don’t understand why you didn’t review this on a full frame Canon EF camera. Both cameras you used have to be adapted. I know you have a FF Canon from previous reviews.
There's no lens correction on the Sony Camera for Canon EF Mount Lenses.
Correction is only (sometimes) necessary for DSLR cameras, the focus sensors on mirrrorless cameras are perfectly aligned because they are part of the same sensor that records the image.
Hi sir what does MO stand for? How to use it?
What's a good all round lens for landscape photography for an older canon 1100d, mainly shooting Fells? Thanks mate
Pick up an efs 10-18. It s cheap, light, sharp and has a magnificient wide angle. From then on any efs kit lens 👌 will do just 🙂 fine.
Great review Chris. I saw that you reviewed the lens using the mc-11 looking for a better resolution sensor to analyze sharpness. But, be careful for corner sharpness with an adapter. I have a 100-400 for canon adapted to a Sony with the mc-11 and, at same aperture and focal length, in the sony the corners are noticeable softer than the photos taken on the canon dlsr. Maybe it has to be to some kind of light reflection inside the adapter before reaching the sensor.
In your case you have many equipment you can compare what I'm saying to confirm what I'm thinking.
Greetings
Which Sony and Canon cameras are you using, exactly?
I'm not certain, but if you have enabled custom lens focus adjustments for use with the DSLR those same adjustments might cause misalignment with the mirrorless sensor. The original A7 sensor had quite a thick layer of glass on the front of it which also contributed to loss of corner/edge sharpness.
I'm sure discrepancy you have observed is down to what is called stack thickness. The thickness of the optical glass cover over the sensor is not the same between the different manufacturers. This is an optical element that has to be factored into the lens design, specifically for optimum corner sharpness. So this lens is most likely optimised for canon sensors like your 100-400mm is.
@@christopherfrost3650 Canon 80D and Sony A6100, roughly same pixel density
@Foto4Max it could be, what the strange thing is the exact same portion around the frame is noticeably softer.
Thanks for a great review! Will this lens make your next 10 lenses you fell for video? .) Im thinking of getting one.
HI Christopher,
Great review as ever. Are you planning on reviewing the new 28-200 tamron voor sony e-mount any time soon?
Eventually, although not soon
Do they make this for the "L" mount ?
I need this
thanks, Rick
You need the newer DG DN version
great review! what is the diameter of the focus ring btw?
Thanks to review the DSLR version! it was very helpful!
Can you review the Sigma 14-24 DG HSM?
One day, yes :-)
Hi Cris, I saw almost all of your videos, and I'm confused. I have a Canon 77D, with a sigma 18-35 1.8 DC; Tamron 10-24 F/3.5-4.5 Di II VC HLD and a Sigma 100-400
5-63 DG
I need a GOOD lens that fills the gap between 35 and 100 mm. What is your recommendation?
The Sigma 50-100mm might be a good option :-)
@@christopherfrost thanks for responding. But have seen reviews that talk about problems with autofocus in the Sigma 50-100? What do you thinking about the sigma 24-105 f / 4 or the Tamron 35-150?
@@nunoserambeque9239 Those are nice options too, although their maximum apertures are not very bright
Chris, how does it’s focus breathing and bokeh compare to the canon l mk 2?
Not sure about focus breathing. As for bokeh, check out my review of that lens :-)
I watch 5 of your reviews every day at the moment :)
May I ask you if there's a Nikon review in the pipe? For example the Z 14-30 or the Z50 with kit lenses? :)
More Nikon reviews are coming soon :-)
Hello !
I am looking to get this lens for my EOS R
I shoot high fashion beauty and sometimes weddings and events. Would you recommend i get this sigma 24-70?
Watch the review, and you'll find out! It will work well on an EOS R, if that's what you're asking me.
(If you have the EF-RF mount adaptor, of course)
Please review the Sony FE 200-600mm
I owned this lens, and while it’s a decent lens. It’s bulky and not the best manual focus for video. I went with the Sigma 24mm and 50mm prime lenses instead
What camera body you use for image stabilisation test in the beginning of the video? Thanks!
I can't remember exactly, although I think it was my Canon EOS R
@@christopherfrostfor me as videographer, image stabilisation is quite important to avoid the hassle in editing. thanks and keep up the marvellous work you've been doing so far!
I personally prefer Tamron 24-70 g2. 😁😁😁
Did you bought it ?
pls review Yongnuo 35mm F1.4 lens. Your review are very valuable for people like me.thanks
Will do soon
Have you reviewed this lens with Sony mount? It’s very different.
I don't really have time to review the same lens on different mounts hehe
Does the Tamron have the same 82mm filter thread?
yes
Thanks for the review of the Sigma 24-70. I want to get a decent lens around this focal range. Obvious choice is the art lens v the Tamron v the Canon EF24-70 f2.8L lens.
How do all of these compare, setting aside price considerations?
Thanks again.
May I make a suggestion for CA testing. I have found a great test is one of those small waterfall fountain rocks for your backyard usually. Where the water cascades down from the top over a dark surface, preferably black. Have a bright direct light source ( sun works fine) and try to photograph it.
Would you go for this over canon’s L equivalent?
Because of F stop
How is the image stabilization with the Sony, does it work?
It does work. Either the OS or the IBIS but not both at same time.
OH FINALLY
I seriously can not make up my mind if i get the Canon, Tamron or Sigma versions of these style of lenses. All three brands to me are fine as I have lenses from all but can not make up my mind for this focal range
Go for the cheapest.
Does the in camera lens correction affect raw image ?
Nope
This work for sony apsc use sigma mc11?
Yup
How would this lens work on a Nikon d3200 ?
Nikon mount. Cropped.
You mentioned this could be adapted to your mirrorless Canon and Sony, why not your Nikon?
There is no suitable adapter yet
You can use Nikon's F-Z adapter
I don't have the relevant adaptor, and this way, people can compare the image quality with the Tamron equivalent lens, which I also tested on 42mp
There is one in Nikon mount.
Dont know why but the bokeh doesnt look as good as the Canon RF and Tamron G2 VC lenses. Other than that, very good.
Are you becoming the new Ken Rockwell? :D haha
HOW MANY PRICE OF NEPAL
why do i want to click on the thumbs up before i watch?
pls review YONGNUO 35MM F/1.4 DF UWM
Will do :-)
Can this be used with canon m50?
yes, i have this lens with my m50
Thanks! Are you using an adapter?
i'd rather tu buy 24-35mm f/2 and 50 or 85 art at the same time. that one doesn's feel like an "art" lens.
been seeing that. probably because, well, it's a zoom! lol
nice
S O F T ! ! !
Useful jack of all trades that many own, enjoy, and use to take great pictures :-)
Pretty much never leaves my EOSR.
Hello !
I am looking to get this lens for my EOS R
I shoot high fashion beauty and sometimes weddings and events. Would you recommend i get this sigma 24-70?
@@supernupe No doubt, I mainly use it for my studio. When I shoot model's outside I go with the Sigma 85mm 1.4 or my Canon 70/200 2.8. Trust me you'll fall in love with with it.. Peep my work on Instagram @tmpapime5.
John 1:1 🙏🏾
So.. Canon or Sigma?
at 2.8 the lens is SOFT both in the middle and corners
😁
:)
the bokeh is terrible
Nah