@@openrelationships I don't agree with both of you. She overtly (so it's not a deduction of mine) teaches women how to "rob" a man, use his money while she's dating him, and how to use also his money to prepare post-breakup by pointing what kind of "easy to resell" gifts she must ask for, and more... you will never hear her talking about a realtionship or inner development, ever! it's only about : how to catch a rich man, and how to benefit from that. For a woman to be classy, she needs to get advice elsewhere. not from an escort-like (if not exactly) thief girl. I'm a traditional man, and I like "REAL" traditional women. As long as both of us play his full expected role (just to be clear, the role of a traditional woman is not only her presence). But unfortunately, it's not what this person looks like, does, or teaches. it's the opposite. A man who respects himself would bail out instantly if a woman acted only at 10% of what she advises. I'm only trying to be polite, otherwise I would have described her with only one sufficient word, avoiding all this detailed comment.
Being classy, teach how to be in society, is something! BEING AFTER MONEY WHILE SHE S NOT WORKING BECAUSE SHE DOES CONSIDER THAT THE MALE IS THE PROVIDER. But she is training them to .... got money. Do some research about her, and you ll find what she was doing before the affluence school. :)
@@willf.8617 She gives tips for marrying a good man that you are in love with. If you dont want to spend money on your couple eventhough women earn less money than men and for pregnancy and maternity issues we have more job difficulties is ok, but dont get angry for Anna to be clever and marry a rich and generous man
@@kiwiverde8592 So I was wrong about the meaning of love. I thought a woman loves the man essentially, not his wallet. so the "cleverness" nowadays, is to ignore all men earning less than millions juste to avoid falling in love with them. Really Really clever ;) You knew this is called gold digging, not love? didn't you? I already said I'm a traditional man, and for a woman to be with me in that life-style, she must love my person first, not my assets. a woman that will stand by my side If I loose my money, a woman that will be interested by me even if I'm earning less (not zero, but less) a woman that loves spending time with me at home. A woman expecting only a decent gift every now and then. the saddest thing with that gold digger teacher, is not only herself (we can read her past on her face), it's the echo that she found in her followers. That shows the sad truth about relationships today. The funniest part, is that gold diggers now want to substitute this name with "just normal relationship". Either you don't want to acknowledge that she explains overtly how to "rob" a man, this is very explicit. or you don't see it because you have the same deep nature as this gold digger.
@Anon value is entirely subjective. For whatever reason, the person providing the allowance finds enough value in her to provide her allowance. And that value could quite literally be anything - which is specific to him. It could be as simple as her time and attention... or it could be as complex as his life being better by her emotional, professional and/or social presence.
My husband gives me an allowance on top and separated from my full access to his savings account/checkin/credit cards. In exchange of well nothing. He loves me he trusts me. Nothing wrong with that. I decided NOT to work during pandemic and it’s OK to relay on my man. He is happy and so I am. Anna doesn’t teach to only relay on a man (unless that’s what you want) she teaches to become a high caliber woman and get a high caliber man.
Hello Rone, i think u didn't watch all Anna's video. I have watch almost all of Anna's video. She didn't mention that women must rely to the man. In fact she has a video stating that women must finish her College degree, get a job and save money. I love Anna's advices. Such an inspiration to women who wants to level up. She teaches elegance and etiquitte. Specially that not all women born with a good teacher from home. So it is lucky nowadays coz there is Anna who teaches ladies to become elegant woman, strong, wise and classy.
Hey Mau, I think Anna's great! I think what she teaches is awesome and important! My only contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning for how women evolved to rely on men, and while even that's only partly true, it's certainly not true today. I do advocate learning skills she teaches so that women who want to have those skills can use them, and that's great! I have lots of girlfriends who's profession it is to inspire men to provide for their livelihood. I, to some extent, do so as well in a professional manner.
@@openrelationships i think it's better to do what you are supposed to do. What i can see, you have a long way to go compared to Anna. First you build your channel. For that you don't need to criticize others. She doesn't do any criminal activities. People know what she does. Only those who want to follow her , will follow her no matter what.
@@openrelationships and she does not rely on her partner. She has her own career. Teachers teach what they are supposed to teach, it's students responsibility to apply in right place.
@@tiffanyfoster5771 you haven't addressed what I've presented Tiffany. And again, I like the product and service Anna provides except for that one thing.
I watch her videos with no intention of thinking i'll get a rich man, but just that we could all do with being a bit classier, especially in today's vulgar and shameless culture, and this goes for both sexes. I find her an interesting character definately, and quite misunderstood, she's actually very clever and charismatic. I could never do her whole thing religiously though, it goes against my natural personality too much, but some of her just general lifestyle tips have been revolutionary for me, really. I would recommend any woman or even man watch a few of her videos, even just for yourselves rather than to try get a partner. PS this 100% isn't hate against your video, I actually found it very interesting :) just sort of discussing the topic in general if you know what I mean!
I agree with you. I am a married woman and a new mother, so I watch Anna Bey’s videos without the intention of finding a rich man, but to instead look for tips on how to elevate my wardrobe. She is indeed very charming and refreshing, especially in this era where women like Cardi B are glamorized and praised for their barely there attire.
I agree with you! I also watch her videos to improve my style and embrace more elegance in my life 🙏 But I also find interesting to understand her point of view regarding relationships, it made me less prejudistic against women who choose to be provided by a man 👌
@@veronicaabreu9218 seeing others' perspectives on relationships dynamics even when we don't agree entirely certainly expands our perception of the world ❤️
Anna Bay is from Sweden. I find it interesting how a highly intelligent woman like her has taken a hard look at what she knew to be standard and how she decided to go for the opposite. If you have been there you know that Sweden basically is run by women and that men act like little boys. Don't look for any healthy masculinity there. I'm German and have experienced a country full of German men who want a woman to be the provider and mother and housekeeper so that they can be irresponsible and uncaring - and feel single any time they want. I appreciate American men because they really appreciate women and also take their role as protector and provider serious without stifling women. I am 73 , have been all over the world and published the book "Dating for Commitment TM".
I like how well you've explained your point of view without being rude. I don't agree with everything Anna says or teaches but I admire her entrepreneurial skills and love seeing how honest she's with her audience. I think she gets a lot of bad press because people label her as someone who teaches women to bag a rich man. I think what she really teaches is elegance, etiquette, great manners and as a cherry on top you'll end up attracting an affluent man if you wish so. I like your arguments though. Great job
I don't think she is honest with her audience, otherwise, she would have told about the escorting. schoolofaffluenceisascam.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/167257_124661877602273_520297_n-1.jpg
Sure, but the comment was directed at her alleged honesty. If you already lie about something such as your origins, how can I trust everything else you are saying?
As someone who’s watched Anna for a very long time - and taken her classes I can tell you 1000% you have missed the message. Anna is so empowering to women, she has now enabled us to communicate and meet all around the world and have friendships that are so strong and true. As a result we have friendships where we all want to be our best selves. It’s unfortunate you’ve missed the message. As a very happily married and retired lady of affluence I can tell you that Anna has a heart of gold and is nothing but positive in her “teachings”.
How is she empowering to women where her entire narrative is get a rich he can pay for e everything including the manicure on your hands. How is encouraging yo be a social climber, only going after men with money empowering. I like her some of her fashion videos and she has good style. Other than that, her entire marketing is to “level up” so you can be accepted by rich “elite” people and bag a rich and an elite man... it is not about encouraging a woman to depend on herself, work hard and built a successful life as a result. Hunting for a rich man so he can buy you Chanel and Cartier is not empowering.
@@mehreenkhawaja9930 her brand is empowerment in the traditional sense. I'm a man and I still agree with her. She believes all women have a chance at leveling up in the social circle regardless of whether or not one is conventionally beautiful or not. She encourages women to get an education and build a network. It is for women who seek that lifestyle, but I do not believe she has ever demeaned a man not of the upper class. She just caters to a specific audience.
Anna's concepts do not fit the norms of western society nowadays, but she is a RUclips so her audience is the whole world with diversity. The values that she promote actually match well with some countries or cultures that maybe unfamiliar to you. There's nothing wrong with agreeing or disagreeing because the world is big and you can't expect everyone to have the same values.
Moana, I think a lot of what Anna teaches is very valuable and I encourage anyone who want those skills to take her course. My only contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning behind women's requisite for men's provision.
In my country a man has to come with his family to the girl's family's house and convince them that he has enough money, job and house before the father agrees to give her daughter to him.
I love Anna's honesty, A LOT of men actually think the way she does too. However, I do believe women should be content and live wholesome lifes with or without a man, I like your respectful insight 😊
I agree, Anna does have some old school mentality that dictates that a woman should rely on a man financially, which is what makes her sound like a gold digger. I definitely don't agree with that and don't follow her opinions on that. I do however like her opinions on class and elegance and leveling up ones lifestyle and quality of life. As an individual, not to catch a rich man. I appreciate your classy disagreement on her and not just an attack. Thank you. One definitely doesn't need to be "affluent" to be classy.
She's not dictating women in any way. In one of her videos she went on to explain about how feminism is about a woman having a choice, so she's not forcing anyone to do anything but you can't deny the fact that not all women want to work AND take care of the house not to mention give birth to and raise children for the sake of this so called 'modern feminism'.
@@yve4889 I agree with you. Anna has clearly shown her intentions. It's upto her followers to grab them all or not. She doesn't force anyone. As I can understand, Anna is a major rival to Rone in their industry. That's why he came up with this video. All are grown women. They know what to do to their future.
I like how you’re so respectful even though you don’t agree with her. Made it easy to understand the other face of her brand without feeling attacked. Great video!
From my observation of Anna Bey, I think that she has generated a majority of her income by running her online school. Her previous course cost about $200-300 USD and the new course cost around $1K. In addition, she should be able to generate other income through her professional RUclips channel and other social media outlets. Her yearly revenue should exceed $1 million (my estimation). There's no mention that she relies on her partner for financial means in recent years. Her partner may give her gifts but I sense that Anna is a bright, career-minded woman and has been supporting herself. In my opinion, Anna is more of a "hunter". Women fall for Anna's teachings for all kinds of reasons, but at its core, it is about a deep desire of having a rich, abundant lifestyle, and to be viewed as affluent.
Thanks for that info Fang. I've nothing against her business. I think it's great and good for her. Just a couple of things which I disagree. I'm all for women's independence and those who want to pursue a provider male partner so long as it's appreciated by both parties.
@@fangfang4298 well if you can assume of how much she makes, then you probably should know about it. She literally said on the interview that her ex invested money to her so that she can have a business.
I agree with what you said. We evolved to work together!!! Men provide and women also provide! This has always been the case. It is only after the industrial revolution that women started staying at home and men had to be the sole financial provider.
she didnt say women must to rely only on men ....on the contrary, it encourages women to be independent and not cheap and no men to take advantage of them!
What you said here made sense. In fact I try not to be dragged to that part of her mindset that much. I watch her to learn about elegance, but I agree that if you keep watching her for too long it starts taking a toll on your mental sanity and viewpoint
No matter men or women, very often we look for comparable partners. My young brother is an “affluent man” by definition. He said: if he has $1b, he would at least date a girl who has $100m.
Hi Rone. You're content is great. However, I must point out that at any point Anna does not ever say that women must and 'need' to rely on men. As someone that has pretty much seen almost all her videos - (since I've been following her for serveral years now), and that is why I like her so much, because in my opínion; She shares how one can and should be independent. And never rely on a man because you never know what can happen and as elegant women we should always be prepared in case the relationship doesn't work out. And also, what she does often point out is that women, although being independent and provides for herself, should still not allow the man to let her pay for dates etc. And she does work for herself as you mentioned her school of affluence. And also her successful youtube channel. So honestly I don't see where she pushes women to only rely on affluent men. She encourages women to not fall for 'false equality' between the man and the women when the woman does everything (cook, clean, take care of thier children plus work outside of the home) -- and all that most men do, not all men but most, just work and does not even help with anything else. So yes she does tell and empower women not to believe and fall for this 'false fairness', "equality stuff". The reason being is that it does not happen - that is not equality. And yes besides this she also does empower women to let the man pay for basically everything. But that does not mean she isn't making money for herself or that she isn't adding value to the relationship in many other ways. (If you see more of her videos you will be able to find out more about what she really teaches and can have a better conclusion and understanding 😉). Much love, take care. 🌺
I, too, agree. Communication is essential in relationships, most especially now with the global exposure of different cultures. Maturity expected from each other includes a capacity to take responsibility for the needs of the family and it takes both parents' to work on it together. Raising children who will help build a better world is the work of heroes - they are the parents now.
Men role is to be a protector and a provider. Women role is to be a nurturer, raising children and house with help, of course. It hasn’t changed. Men just don’t accept that role no longer as long women are in the work force having their own career and now making more income than men. Men have becoming more feminine and women has becoming more masculine. As a feminine female, I prefer a masculine male. No matter how successful I am in my career, I I prefer a man that are protector and provider. These men are more desirable.
@@radianceface5107 That's certainly, and originally, what society has propagated for a long time. What I propagate is women's independence - that women can find security in themselves if they choose to and can provide for themselves. I'm also not saying that the male as a provider can't be arranged. I'm certainly a big proponent for clearly communicated arrangements!
My problem with Anna Bey is that she throws men under the bus and seems to equate the only value of a man in a relationship and as a person is in what material possessions he has. In one of her videos qbout why she'll never pay for the date she explicitly states that the only way a man expresses his masculinity is by providing. Being a man is about more than just providing. There's a very good reason mental health among men is neglected and attitudes like hers is one of the contributers.
I haven't heard or known her to say that but if she did say that, it's a horrific outlook and definitely will profoundly influence what she propagates to other women
Btw I think she's all for being financially independent as a woman. Having your own education and income. Finding a classy man is not a means to get food on the table. I think this stuff about a man paying for a date is only to make sure he's feeling the cost of dating in order to filter out people who don't value you.
She has always advocated for women to have independence, including financial independence, to be able to leave a man at any point required, such as controlling or abusive relationships.
I was referring to her recent video on her evolutionary psychology reasoning of how women evolved to rely on men. Otherwise, I like most of the things she propagates!
Hi Rone, i appreciate your concerns and you points. I have been following Anna Bay from her first video, she has never forced or told women to completely rely on men, what she is trying to teach is for women to aim high and level up in all aspects of their lives and not to settle for whats mediocre. She teaches etiquette, how to conduct your self with good behaviour, values and how to develop self worth and self love. Cultures may have evolved in other parts of the world but not all the world, Im coming from Zambia, Africa were women respect men who are providers because its just by nature. I feel its okey to have women who want affluent men and they should not be judged. Anna Bay's programme has been very beneficial to women and will support her through
I appreciate that Esther and I also recognize that about Anna. My contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning for women's having to be dependent on men, which you seem to also believe although not surprising since you've followed her all along ;)
Let me simplify this...Nobody looks for average things in life...both gender looks for Best option for themselves.. And especially women looks for a man who's superior to her... Bcoz God or universe has created the man ...masculine energy to protect his partner ..n if man can't take responsibility of partner... Then we are missing the basic main point .. But most importantly woman can take care of themselves but we look for the partner who is the real man to offer his partner a choice ... Freedom to choose if to work or not...It's about having evolved person....Man.. ! Such men We can find it mostly in particular society..that is affluent society....!
Hey Anuradha! I understand a feminine individual whether if it's a male or female likes to have as a sexual partner someone who's more masculine, and take on masculine traits. I've got nothing against women that like to have a male security provider so long as they recognize that security is something they can have for themselves. At the minimum, she must recognize that her security comes from her ability to survive and influence others to contribute to her survival. This is why, like Anna Bey, I like to teach skill sets. On the other hand, if a woman were to only look to her partner for security, she'll always remain a slave. If she were to have that sense of security for herself, she can make arrangements with any man and have the skills and therefore control of her own life to be able to leave when she's not appreciated.
Yes Rone...Anna bey is mainly focused on finding most capable potential partner... In which she indirectly teach to become a best version of yourself... In which she also focus on working on something for Self...like she herself working on her soul person .... you focused on teaching skills for individual development for most evolved life & society... At the end we all have different soul purpose for healthy society ... We must understand this & work together for creating healthy society...bcoz what all that matters is good intentions... & I see that Rone's & Anna's intention is good & pure ... You Both rocks .... N you both share knowledge ...positivity & hope ...👍
@@anuradhasonawane9644 Thank you for that! I agree with you! I like most of what Anna teaches and recommend women who want those skills to check out her course!
As a woman who worked as a massage therapist in a wealthy town for a decade, I can attest with complete confidence that most, if not ALL of those soccer moms were riding on the checkbook of their husbands. The only difference is that Anns Bey openly admits that this is the norm for the wealthy. The women I met didn't talk openly about it and downplayed it by telling me how much they " run around town volunteering".🙄 And let's be clear, it's a rare occurrence when the man stays home with the kids and the woman is the breadwinner.
Certainly! I agree. In fact I love that what Anna Bey provides help to those women whom would like to learn skills that men who'd like those sorts of arrangements require, and there are plenty of them. This is a good thing. I'm a proponent for and advocate of well-arranged marriage. My contention isn't about that particular arrangement but rather the evolutionary psychology reasoning she provides.
@@openrelationships There is truth to the idea that men and women are fundamentally different biologically in ways that determine their behaviors. This has been proven over and over by evolutionary psychology, and it's why dating coaches tell women to never chase a man. He's the hunter! And let's consider that when a man is out of work, it hits his self-esteem and self-worth much harder than it does a woman. Women don't usually attach their identity to a career like men do. Women have a multi-faceted view of themselves because being a "provider" isn't driving them as much as having a full life. But if you ask a man who he is, his profession is at the forefront of his response. Not that he's a dad or husband or fixes up classic cars. My mother's generation fought for women's rights and won them. Unfortunately, the pendulum swung too far into feminazi territory and have created Beta males who have been shamed into stepping aside so their wives can take the lead. This infantilizing of husbands has created unhappy marriages and divorce. Then when the woman goes back out in the dating world in her 40s, she wants an alpha because she realizes that she fought against her feminine nature her entire 20s and 30s, trying to boss and lead, not realizing that it destroyed the man's ego and sex drive. We can wish all day long that men and women are the same, but we never will be the same and in fact, our attraction to each other is because we're fundamentally different.
@@transitionsnc I'm delighted you commented on this because it seems I've missed her comment! She points out lots of errors and ironies which I'm going to point out now.
@@Mmmmkaaay Thank you for providing this substantial comment! I really appreciate it as you voice out the important ideas that others haven't had the chance to explore! So thank you for that. I'd like to point out the ironies in your comment one by one, for posterity, and would appreciate your thoughts. I absolutely agree men and women are driven differently and it's this very premise and the misunderstanding about it that's the cause of most of the problems in relationships which I do my best to "enlighten" - to shed light on. Dating coaches all over the world provide unbelievable mistaken advice and ironies. I've been one for the better part of a decade. In evolutionary psychology, there are many theories and some more reasonable than the dominant one for different reasons. Just to point out the irony in your statement, it ISN'T necessarily that men are hunters and evolved as hunters that they'd prefer the woman don't pursue them, but may have more to do with the area of the brain that makes it so men and women don't appreciate "connection" in the same way. Women for example connect by sharing information without requiring a point. Men don't connect in that way. This also doesn't go to tell you that if a woman were to approach a man that it wouldn't be an attractive thing - and in fact it would! There are OTHER reasons women don't do it which has nothing to do with hunter gatherer psychology. About men's identity based on his profession, is a theory you can't prove. It also doesn't negate women's identity being connected with her profession. It could very well be a matter of her choosing to have offspring and not having her profession outside of child-rearing as anything significant to her since they can arrange for the other partner (male or female) to provide that aspect of the relationship.
I just want a man who will love me love my children. Will love me and think I’m beautiful even if I’ve been taking care of the kids all day and haven’t had a chance to eat let alone put on make up and dress up in fancy clothes.I don’t care if I fit in with snobby rich people and worry about what handbag I carry or if I choose to wear leggings when I finally get a day off from work. I want real friends that I can be myself with and not have be be fake.
I don't recall her saying that women should rely on men. She advocates etiquette, social graces and being selective of the type of man we want in our lives. Men need to earn a place in our lives, respect our boundaries, and behave decently. No woman wants to be with a man who she needs to support or behaves badly.
I would like to present my opinion in the most respectable way possible and say that Anna under no circumstances is teaching women or young girls anything about relying on men. Unless you consider a woman helping other women dress better easily. 😃😄😁
I came across with your video randomly and I watched for curiosity I have been following Anna because I find her teachings about class, elegance and self value very useful regardless the infamous wealthy husband search that drives everybody crazy But I must say she is right when she recomends to every woman to set boundaries and respect herself getting out of her life a low quality man that consumes all her energy, resources and youth For men is easy to keep themselves in their comfort zone while women have to deal with more responsabilities that practically nobody see or appreciate, as a result we age faster than men and get exhausted and angry easily Our body an mind are always attached to hold, care and nurture others and that implies a high cost for us (both, physically and mentally) by the other hand men are free of this and is socially acceptable Unless you decide with your partner to have no children, hire a maid to be in charge of the house work and as a couple have the same amount of incomes dare to speak about equality! Only in that conditions I could say is fair to expect 50/50 I apologize for my English, is not my first language
It is incredibly sad that many men feel offended about her videos, confidence and self esteem issues? Maybe. They say that when you talk bad about someone else, you are speaking louder about yourself. Not to mention you are only focusing in one of her topics, she has thousands of women to become better versions of themselves with discipline, education, and awareness of our own flaws.
Cinthia, what you say is only relevant when the argument is against the individual rather than a position they've presented. In this case, I've made clear what Anna Bey provides is a good product for women looking for the skill sets she teaches. I strongly recommend it! What I Disagree on is specifically the evolutionary reasoning behind it.
She does NOT teach women they MUST rely on a man. She teaches to find a man they CAN rely on and who does NOT think of it as something special. A man who has no problem to live by it no matter what the circumstances are. She takes it for granted that women have an education, are well rounded and have made their own money. She is a great example of that. The world is full of women who believed that love is all you need and that money does not matter. They are the ones driving cars that fall apart, have roommates because they can't afford the rent and have a hard time to afford child care. Today more than ever it's easy for men to disappear and leave a women to deal with the problems and kids he leaves behind. And men do it all the time. Just talk to people who work for child support agencies.
Hello Rone, i honestly respect your views about it, I have been watching her videos only for me to elevate my look , on how to dress classy especially on a budget, if there is something she mentioned about "relying on a man" .... I think thats personal choice .... i actually dont agree with that, but she has helped a lot of women to elevate their personal style & proper etiquette....
I don't understand why you'd make an entire video criticising Anna just because she intimates towards evolutionary psychology. Her teachings are much broader than that.
I've watched many of Anna's videos. I think she has a lot of point and shes helping a lot of women to carry themselves in a modest and respectable manner which many women these days don't possess anymore because mainstream media has society believe in everything it publishes. Coming from a 3rd world country, the Philippines. Where many women and their children suffer poverty. In others' view being dependent on men is weakness. Means weakness for us women. But many situations put us women to dependency. And sometimes we dont have much choice. In the Philippines, that is true. Being able to better yourself in all facets, even just how a woman carries herself puts her in a positive and beautiful light that attracts the right crowd. Eventually the right and suitable man who also has made himself prepared and ready for manly responsibilities including but not limited to ensuring his family's needs are met. Many average men in the ph gives life to babies they cant feed. Ill-breeding causes problems, when marrying into a family of a man whose parents or family value class, elegance and finesse. Being able to transition from being mainstream and middle class to class and grace is priceless. Has saved family ties from being broken. You have a point. But I think being able to adjust and play between the social class spectrum is always a plus.
I watch all of anna's video...she never said woman have to rely on man...never... She said it's our right want to have career or not.but she advice woman to have career and education,bcos there is a time we have to stand up alone& independent 100% . she just educate woman who is interested entering affluence society .and how to make yourself proper to get affluence husband .
Women and men must rely on a man for CERTAIN THINGS! Each have certain strengths and weaknesses. As a team with respect for each other, men and women will succeed much better working together. Anna does both - she encourages self-reliance and healthy inter-dependence.
Anna does do both Rene. I agree. My only contention was her evolutionary psychology premise. And you're right. Just like any team or partnership, it's better to play on each other's strengths rather than rely upon their weaknesses. Ultimately, this is all better communicated at the outset of any relationship, personal or professional, instead of presuming expectations.
it makes a difference whether the man brings home the resources and the woman uses them to create something for the community and takes care of the family with devotion, or whether a man brings resources home so that the woman can buy handbags and shoes for herself. All that so that she does not leave him, because she has deserved this luxury as a self-proclaimed "high value woman" (with nothing) and for this she lets him participate in her body in retreat.
I agree Luna. Although depending on the man, even merely having her presence and companionship as a 'value-exchange' is value enough and worthwhile and good for them.
Most wealthy women are wealthy because of a husband, father Etc. She's right. To get ahead they must rely on men. Single women are not independently wealthy bro.
A woman can be financially independent without having to rely on a man. I believe it’s mainly fulfilling a desire of a man’s true nature to feel needed, provide, be capable and be appreciated for what he can do for the woman. So if a man should pay, doesn’t mean that woman is relying on him. Just that the ‘masculine energy’ feels good that its innate purpose in a relationship is being fulfilled by the ‘feminine energy’.
If you are not watching all of her videos, you are not qualified to pass these judgements. You really need to watch the rest of them because your first complained is not even an issue. She teaches ladies to NOT be dependant on men. You missed her ENTIRE teaching by making your choices based on a "few" videos. Thank you and have a nice day.
Hey Murphy! Thanks for finding this video and taking the time to comment. Your concern is common in terms of the comments I receive on this video. To argue that I'd need to watch all her videos to make an educated comment is a very poor position. It's tantamount to watching a fella say 1+1=3 and having to watch all his videos to make a correction. So like I've repeatedly assured people in the comments section, if she were consistent with what she says, then I wouldn't need to watch all her videos, unless she says completely contradictory things in all her videos, which I don't believe she does. What I think you missed Murphy was my argument against her evolutionary reasoning that women evolved to rely on men for survival. You only need to hear that once from someone to recognize you won't have to see all their videos to see if they're consistent.
I love the way you agree to respectfully disagree with her views.. & the points that you made are spot on!! I am an independent women, but I am a stay at home mama of 3 beautiful babies & a married to an amazing man who is obviously our sole provider!! Thank u for such a graceful, respectful video!! It sure is refreshing!!
Men are amazing and when you choose to have a relationship, there are some basics she covers. I don’t think it’s evolution but basics on how men and women relate to one another.
I would want my man to be masculine and a provider and stuff like that and I of course have no problem playing my role in that relationship. Meaning showing intimacy and showing love towards my man. So I understand why some people don’t like her although you never really know her relationship with her partner maybe she shows him intimacy but doesn’t speak of that on her channel
I, for one, like Anna. I was just make a critical distinction and disagreement of one of her perspectives about men and women's roles in relationships that she referred as evolutionary psychology. Masculinity, has nothing to do with providership. I have nothing against any gender being the provider and a woman's being the primary provider, if that's the case, isn't necessarily making her masculine or a "man of the house" or whatever the colloquial term would be. It just makes her a powerful, wonderful, and effective woman.
Rone John - Relationship Expert oh yeah me too I watch her all the time. And yes a woman being a provider has to be done sometimes say like a single mother. I get how that doesn’t make her masculine but when it comes to a romantic relationship I don’t think a woman should be a provider. And in my opinion a quality of a masculine man is a provider especially when he’s in a romantic relationship with a woman. When it comes to romance I don’t think women and man are equal.
@@thedollreviewerI don't believe anyone is equal regardless of gender since everyone has their own specialties and experiences - although I believe everyone deserves equal opportunity. Aside from that, your *preference* is a male provider and that's great and if you can communicate that with a partner as an arrangement, that's very good for you and of you. Yet again, when it comes to providership, it's got nothing to do with gender or femininity or masculinity IF you want actual freedom. There are plenty of women who are fantastically feminine and make a lot more money than their partner who are free not because they're the provider but because they don't live in the "male as a provider" gender role that society has programmed into men and women.
Rone John - Relationship Expert I think I can understand what your saying. When it comes to relationships it’s not just men and women anymore and it’s more diverse.
Im all for more classy women but you do not have to have nose job, fake eyebrows, dyed hair and plump lips to get a man or even an affluent man. You need manners, natural as possible beauty and a great personality. As well as be independent. Thats all im sayin. Trying to look a certain way may draw you to him but eventually fakery will make you lose him. But whatever
Not at any time does this lady consider the nourishment and development of the female brain. She seems to think that the purpose of the female skull is restricted to wearing a hat and getting a great blow dry at the hairdresser rather than housing the most fantastically developed organ. It saddens me to my core to listen to this enormous emphasis on appearance. I have never in my whole life considered using a man to increase my prosperity because I believe that I am as capable as the next man and I value myself in my entirety. Although my appearance is beautiful I am much more impressed by the development and quality of my intelligence and how I relate to fellow members of my species. Now that is real elegance . It could never be improved upon by wearing a Designer handbag. Sadly, she also reduces a man to his most basic form, valuing only the appearance of the female form. She thinks she can fool a thinking man so easily. A man who is attracted so easily is lost just as easily to the next woman playing the same game. She degrades both men and women. So sad to see this in our time. I guess we have to accept that women like this exist accounting for her online popularity. Good luck to them and I wish them well but they may pass on this mode of thinking to their female progeny leading to a higher risk of under achievement and may result in minimising potential of their offspring.They drag women back to a mind set we have struggled so hard to escape. Maybe, this is the limit of their ambition, being an appendage to a wealthy man because it is all they are capable of achieving. The irony of this enormous focussed drive to appear “elegant” and “expensive” unfortunately results in the direct opposite. These women reduce themselves to obviously discounted commodities incapable of existing in their own right and inevitably they look so cheap and synthetic. What a world we live in? We are born with class it cannot be purchased, it exists in our minds and the rest follows naturally. To be the Mistress of our own destiny is a great human ambition and hopefully one day all women will understand the value of this and the lazy,ignorant, backwardness of tricking a man into paying for us for the rest of our lives will be recognised as the most shameful of human aspirations confined to the history books of female evolution. Until such time we must protect ourselves from the easy ideology of free loading and living off another’s successful financial efforts. I wonder if this lady has considered what will happen when she ages and the husband who will still be wealthy (if she hasn’t squandered his wealth on her worthless handbags and shoes) decides he wants a younger more “elegant” and “expensive” looking model? I suppose she will divorce him and steal the remainder of his assets. Check mate. Bravo!
I think she talks about one aspect of life , that’s about love, romance and thinking of having a long run relationship with man, not about careers or all aspects of life
No. She doesn't teach us to rely on the man but she helps us to find a high quality man. Nowadays many men are so financially unstable compare to women and there are women out there who pay everything for the men. And FYI most of her videos r not only men but to upgrade our appearance to be better n classy.
I love her. My reasons are to look and carry myself well and feel better about my fashion choices and manners. As a married women, all her teachings regarding the two things I mentioned above have been very beneficial
You didn’t get it... it’s not about getting an affluent man. It’s the teaching about NOT DATING a man who is not willing to give to his woman the feeling that she potentially could rely on him. It’s a biological fact that the feeling to become financially responsible for the family causes stress for the woman and thus doesn’t support her to relax in her femininity. Ok, but what if there are no family plans yet for the couple, you would ask. Well, the pillar of a relationship is sexual attraction. Feminine (not feminine looking) women don’t feel attracted to men who are treating them in a way that doesn’t allow them to relax. How does a woman relax the best? When she wouldn’t have to worry about financial problems. Never. How can she make sure she doesn’t have to? Being with a man who in worst case would be willing to provide and care for her. When women are single they take care of both, the frame of financial security for themselves and the comfort. It works fine! The are financially independent. What happens when the are in a relationship? They want to give love, providing comfort. To do it in the best way possible, they need to rely on the overall security, the financial frame. In some couples it’s not the finance that is this frame, it may be physical engagement of a man building a home for a family that can also give this feeling of security. To make it simple it’s that: The magic happens when THE MASCULINE PROVIDES SECURITY: The feminine can trust -> woman happy -> woman opens truly -> man gets sex and love -> man happy ->> BOTH HAPPY 😊 It’s so simple. You can even go do far to say that SECURITY is the only biologically attractive for a feminine woman. If it’s not the case, then it’s not the feminine woman. Or not in her feminine phase in life. Security can be seen in different ways: Some feel secure because a person has a strong appearance, able to risk, to fight for sth, able to somehow find solutions and to provide. Women provide this kind of security as single mothers, as singles for themselves etc.... but the ONLY WAY they are sexually attracted is when for once they don’t have to provide this security.
I grasp precisely what you're saying Maria. There is no such thing as 'getting' * any * person but rather about what is the dynamic constituted within the relationship and the agreements negotiated. I'd never encourage any woman enter into a relationship where she doesn't get what for her would be a deal-breaker. In other words Maria, if your requiring you must feel you can rely upon someone for whatever reason you'd like is a requisite for you to enter into an arrangement, then you must voice it out, communicate it, make that clear agreement and ONLY enter that relationship when it's understood. Your theory, which you're presuming to be fact, that the woman requires financial reliability outside of herself for her to feel feminine is just that, theory, and a poor one. PLENTY of women don't require any financial requirement from her partner for her to be wondrously feminine. You mention the pillar of a relationship is sexual attraction. That's true in a very small sense. It's a very small way to look at a relationship. When you look at relationships and the foundations it's based in, begin with the premise that * a relationship * is how you interact and interface with any entity AND THEREFORE it's the arrangements and dynamics that you ESTABLISH at the outset that is THE PILLAR of that relationship. In other words Maria, LOTS of relationships don't require sexual attraction to work fantastically well such as arranged relationships were the goal is things outside of love. I'll leave it at that for now. Perhaps when you fix your frame of how relationships are constituted could you appreciate the things that make it wonderful and successful.
@@openrelationships Thank you for your detailed response! So we totally agree on this point "then you must voice it out, communicate it, make that clear agreement and ONLY enter that relationship when it's understood". And what Anna is teaching, is EXACTLY THAT. She teaches, how to communicate that "clear agreement". Why does it may sound harsh for some people? Because maybe men and women who are already have the tendency to dominate and voice out by their character, don't need this motivation. For them its natural to stand up for their rights in relationships. Of course they make completely different experiences with men. For example, when I date the so called Mr. Nice Guy or a passive man, then there is no risk to be manipulated by him into an arrangement that would harm me. An no, not only the weak women who need therapy get manipulated. Also strong intelligent women get manipulated because they want to open their hearts, invest in feelings and then it gets more difficult for the harmony seeking types of women (the mostly "feminine" types) to reestablish the arrangement that is fair for them. So Anna is helping only THESE kind of WOMEN, the ones who want to be able to play the feminine part in the relationship (not in the job or elsewhere). What is FEMININE? I think this is where women start to feel triggered ;) As I did too, btw ;) A feminine body is different to a masculine. It works different because of the hormones and the hormones affect a lot the emotions, obviously. Hormones can be influenced by the external factors like stress etc. So people can adapt to circumstances and in this way develop feminin or masculine Features. What do you consider as masculine features? (Warning, Please don't feel triggered ;)) In EXTREMES I would say, *FEMININE is the floating, soft way of acting, the more passive settled mother like ;) empathic and harmony-oriented, way to interact with people, sense for creativity and comfort *MASCULINE is in contrary to be goal-oriented, focused, proactive etc. No one in the modern world can be successful to follow the masculine or feminine hormones to 100% all the time. We need both every day! Some days require from men to be 98% feminine. And its great that they are able to do so. Sometimes we woman are happy to live to 90% in our masculine, especially when we felt suppressed in our feminine roles or we experienced how women are being suppressed in the past. We want to balance it out. Its natural. (Yes, I speak out of experience ;)) We are driven by he need to get into a balance in our life that feels right in the moment. Many women (NOT ALL, please!) nowadays feel the need to be able to live in there feminine within a relationship. And this is the only audience of Anna Bey. To answer to the other Points: It is NOT my theory "that the woman requires FINANCIAL reliability outside of herself". I was saying that it is a feminine feature to require SECURITY in the areas where it is important to her. For some women, its the loyalty, for some others its a home, for some others its luxury and for others its values like to be eco-friendly, child-friendly or whatever makes her feel secure and makes her relax, because she can trust. There are different life experiences and personal preferences. Lets not judge these preferences. Yes, I agree, sexual attraction is not THE pillar but one of several pillars in a healthy relationship. There are well-working couples who don't have sex. Of course! Again, preferences are different. I was talking about those, for whom its is important. In this case the attraction is important, you must agree. But I have the impression you consider this attraction as sth superficial. This is not what I am referring to. I am referring to the attraction to a person that you feel as a result of his/her actions. Which doesn't have to lead to sex but just makes you shine and want to make effort and make this person happy. Which again is very close to the platonic attraction. See, I want to feel attracted to people who are close to me, family members, friends, etc... But isn't it another thing to also feel attracted to my partner? Would I feel attracted to him/her when she behaves like my child? Maybe. But we do notice what kind of behavior attracts us the most. We deserve to look for that exact way to feel attracted to our partner and not judge others for their preferences. Anna Bey is speaking for only a group of women who have the same preferences as her. Let's not judge the tastes of others, look and listen more precisely the message of people, question our own trigger points and try not to think in stereotypes. Anna Bey spreads a very important feminist message such as "The right to choose the life a woman wants without being judged". She doesn't teach to hurt anyone but to live a happy and fulfilling life. Anyone who doesn't feel addressed, doesn't have to even react. Like I wouldn't react to a video that teaches me how to train your muscles after an injury which I didn't have. I would understand, "Ok, this video should help XYZ, I am not XYZ, so what do I know?" I appreciate the exchange with you. You seem very nice btw ;)
@@mariahoffmann2211 I'll address each of your remark in turn Maria. From time to time, since this video has gained traction, I've watched it over several times, and noticed I promoted Anna Bey A LOT in this video and in fact have repeatedly stated, what she provides is valuable and I recommend anyone who want the outcome she promotes to check out the particular skill sets she teaches because they're VERY useful. I only make the disclaimer that any one who receives any information discern them with critical observation and think for yourself. Take what's useful and throw out what's not. And you've even shed light on the irony that I provided! While Anna teaches women to be discerning women to empower them, the only contention I was pointing out in the video is the * innacuracy * of her evolutionary psychology reasoning of women's reliance upon men and the disempowering identity you get from that if you believe it. Be wary of what you consider as theories and facts because it's self-deception. In truth, the more you know, allows you to recognize VERY FEW things are indeed facts. You're asserting the requisite for security outside of * her self * is a feminine trait. This is, and has been, what's propagated throughout society throughout time - most of which has been spent where women has always been seen as property of men. RECOGNIZE that the IDEA "ownership" is JUST an idea that hadn't existed before the agricultural era and only came into existence when humans recognized they needed the concept of "owning" land to propagate society and in the same token the inheritors of these lands. As a result, came about the notion that JUST LIKE you put seed into fertile soil and you get "product", you put seed into fertile woman and you get "product" in which would inherit "your" land and therefore humans came about ways to having to * own * their women so they could know their children were their own. So throughout time immemorial, women have always been seen as property and propagated as property which is the reason she inherits the family name of the man during the sale contract (ie marriage contract) from father to her new owner: "husband". So I work at empowering women to recognize she's a completely free individual. In fact, what separates women from girls is that a woman recognizes that her sense of security comes strictly from herself alone. There are women that are young of age and there are girls at older ages.
@@openrelationships Im starting to get the impression, that you may not read my words correctly (maybe I'm expressing myself badly). In no way is Anna Bey teaching women to become dependent on men! If you dont agree with the feminine/masculine theory, its ok. It takes time to identify your femnine and masculine side, its a process that we dont need to talk further about. So taking away the idea of gender traits, if you listen carefully to Anna you will notice that what she is teaching, is simply how to enter a fair partnership. "Fair" in her sense and in the sense of her followers. When you are entering a partnership, no matter what kind of partnership, lets say its a project, you want to know - for the duration of the project - that you can rely on your partner in her/his responsibilities, don't you? Its suggested for every start-up to sign a contract with their business partners in the eraly stage. Why? Because it give a sense of SECURITY. Does that make you dependent on your partner? In a way, yes, but only as long as you expect him or her to "do the job". If you prject partner is sick or whatever, you are still able to do the job yourself. Anna is always stresses the part that women need to stay "independent" - which means to stay ABLE TO LIVE ALONE in a good way. Understand, that yes, every modern person should be able to feel secure by him or herself. Think on when you are travelling alone, you take care of the navigation and enjoy the landscape all by yourself which is great. But then you meet someone who is guiding for a bit and all of a suddon you see things diffrently, more intense and flourish. And you may have more time to get a more detailed look on details, the tastes, the language etc.. Are you becoming dependent a lose your dignity because of that? No, right? Anna teachings are in no sense differnt to what people in business learn how to build teams, how to communicate, how to negociate. In addition, yes its important to also speak about what seems fair for the women she is adressing. Are you a feminine woman? Are you a masculine man? To understand her message, maybe its easier to free yourself from history and the complexes of our societies that are different in the world as well. I understand perfectly why you are referring to the history, its interesting. Ive read the book "sapiens" as well and I see why you think its important for the topic. Its interseting to know indeed. What helps women now, are suggestions how a marriage could work IN A MODERN WORLD OF HIGH SOCIETY. She is mostly adressing to women who ALREADY ARE INDEPENDENT and reponsible in their single life but wish MORE than that. This concept is obviously only interesting to men who also alraedy "have achieved it all" in a materialistic sense, but look for love with a woman of his standards. Maybe I see the things from the eyes of a modern and free society and surrounding, growing up with the idea, that every person (men or women) create their own life and are responsible for it by themselves. For me as for Anna's followers, probably different to YOUR AUDIENCE, this is a natural fact that doesnt need any more explanation. I just wanted to point out that how some comments put her teachings in a wrong light instead of really trying to understand her perspective. You and Anna have similar goals, to empower women! Thats a great mission and you should support one another! Anna's audience is strong and independent women who want a relationship with a man who can be EVEN STRONGER! Your audience needs impowerment to become independent and strong in the first place. So this is why obviously you stress on different things even if your values are probably not completely different in relationships.
No no she's using New Age ideology, not evolutionary psychology. I think she picked a raisin or 2 from the evo psych cake to suit a particular argument but other than that I have only seen New Age ideology in her videos. It's nice to be classy but the new age is basically a destructive trap.
I like her,style,tips,I m a person.men s jobs,making my way in man s world,its very difficult not to adapt to masculism. I m still feminine. And many things she does,I already do.
Thank you for respectfully presenting your opinion about Anna Bey’s teachings. I also disagree with her interpretation of evolutionary psychology in regards to male-female relationships. In my opinión, part of being an empowered woman is being able to decide the type of relationship we have with men and how we will provide for ourselves. If a woman decides that she wants to live off men, and she actually can get a man to take care of her, kudos to her! She was able to get the life she wanted, in the way she wanted. I respect that woman’s decision and, as an empowered woman-even though I would never make that choice for myself-I would defend that woman’s right to live life on her own terms (as long as she is honest about what she is doing and not calling herself an “elegant lady”) But, it must be clear to all that this was the choice this woman made, not her destiny or her only option.I believe that Anna Bey’s argument about the evolutionary dynamics of male-female relationships is disproven by the fact that she is on RUclips making her own money instead of letting her affluent man take care of her. In my eyes, this sole action contradicts her public discourse on the evolutionary nature of men-women relationships and makes her advice very unauthentic.
I believe Anna is been miss understood. She wants women to be elegant and educated, at the same time if you want to married a rich man, why not. She also encourage women to get educated and have her own carrier
80% of women would choose a partner from only 20% of the men. And this is for a good reason! Men are not like this at all. Actually you agree with Anna Bay, not disagree. She's not teaching women to have a certain mindset. She is trying to help women, who already have this mindset, not to make mistakes and look cheap, while wearing expensive brands. Because expensive and elegant are not the same. 😜
I dont follow Anna for the reason you describe. I dont think that it is a good idea to plan your life on relying on a man when it comes to finances. That is very dangerous because these narrow gender roles come with negative consequences and it is what our ancestors were trying to get away from. i do not think she empowers women. I think she teaches women a very narrow way of living, to find a rich man, dress a certain way. If everyone did what she is teaching, the world would be boring. Why not work on yourself and find a man who supports you on your own terms as well?
What i think is ironic is that even though she claims to live off of a rich man, she makes her money off of other women and their financial insecurities. Her husband is also quite average...upper middle class at best.
It takes some enlightenment to recognize that relationships work terrifically well when arrangements are clear - even relationships without requiring love or affection.
@@ah5721 what did you think I'd missed? Arrangements aren't devoid of love and affection. In fact, having love and the appropriate arrangements are ideal, but not necessary for both to be participated
@@openrelationships as long as people in the arangments are okay w/ their relationships whichever avenue they may be whether its just a business transaction type like escorts ,sugar babies etc that between both consenting adults. However, one of the goal Anna teaches is that its not okay to use people just for their money but the goal should be also for long term relationships that also include mutual affection and long term relationships such as marriage in the long run. Having the nice things us is what draws people in. Stick around with Anna and you learn how to maintain your image& be a better version of yourself after you filter what she says and apply what you find is helpful to your situation. I take somethings she says with a grain of salt because I'm not a traditionalist like her.
@@ah5721 I have been watching her videos for a while. And I never ever saw her saying about pure love. It's all about money and exchanges. In one video she literally says " women should make her man buy expensive things as much as possible like hand Bags and expensive rings before break up" so they can take it with them after break up!! . A secured act you see. And in that video one girl commented " Hand bags should be kept in mint condition so it will stay fresh till break up!! " This is being meterialestic at its peak. This woman is highly m@nupilative and dangerous. I feel sorry for the guy who married this woman.
She’s attracted to high achievers financially, highly motivated individuals. Who cares let her be. Unfortunately in this world there is no such thing is equality between man and woman. Empowering woman doesn’t mean telling her to get a job and pay equally it’s about giving woman the opportunities so that we can be equal to a man
I had to read that twice to make sense of the irony you provided! On one hand you insist there's no such thing as equality between the sexes and on the other hand you insist empowerment is pursuing equality between the sexes ;) Aside from that, I certainly advocate for *people's* pursuing whom they want in whatever arrangement they would like so long as the arrangements are clear on all parties. This includes arrangements where the woman relies on the man for provision. In fact, I encourage any woman who'd like that arrangement to see what Anna provides since she teaches some very useful stuff! My only contention in the video was her evolutionary reasoning for women's dependence on men.
@@openrelationships I mean to say that woman are still hugely disadvantaged in this day and age For example it is still not considered the norm for a woman to date a man ten years older then her. Society tends to criticise and frown upon this where as a man can date much younger. Men are still expected to be the ones to choose when they wish to propose and society still finds it hard to accept that a woman can propose. These freedoms and expectations have been taken Away from woman because of society’s expectations. How can we change this? Why is a woman still underpaid why do they have less superannuation on average then a man. If society is going to treat woman like unequals then let men take more responsibility for woman. We still have a long way to go. Gender equality has a lot to do with reproduction and unfortunately a woman only has a window where she can achieve this in most cases. Men however can usually reproduce much later on in life. The inherent value the society places on a woman then limits them. This is systematic inequality and it can be attributed to reproduction. So yes I am in favour of men stepping up and providing woman with “more” because society is so unjust towards woman.
@@jenny86516 In my book, Relationshps 101, I go over precisely the notion that women have been dealt a hard hand wherein society really inhibits her to be an independent person. So you see, I'm a huge advocate for women's emancipation! Yet, to your notion that women must be paid for, and cared for, in exchange of because of the unsubstantiated idea that women are unfairly paid in the marketplace, is a very poor position. It's unsubstantiated. Women, on an aggregate, are paid less as an average on a yearly basis not because of unfairness but rather because unlike men, the majority of women step out of the workforce and opt to have children and child-rear. As a for example, there are VERY FEW men that can co-star with Scarlett Johannsen and get paid anywhere near the millions she's paid. It's not due to unfairness AGAINST the male. It's her market-value in her profession. And like I said, if she were to CHOOSE to childrear or be a home-maker (or even for no other reason than the man in particular likes providing) and make this AGREEMENT within their partnership, ABSOLUTELY the counterpart who agrees to provide shall provide for the counterpart who takes on the childrearing responsibilities (and that's whether it's the male or female!).
@@openrelationships there are so many other factors. You are sticking to purely financial facts but there are so many ways society and government can bring woman forward. Don’t forget that the woman’s suffer age movement only started in the mid 1800s, the right to vote was only achieved in the 1900s. Your also only factoring western countries where woman are treated with more equality. There are many countries that that woman have almost no rights - Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen (these are all Islamic countries and have cultural reasons why their societies are constructed that way) there is still a long way to go and we havnt made a dent in what needs to be achieved. Until such time men can do more to support this inequality financially and emotionally. I am in no way saying a woman should sit on her arse and have a guy provide her with everything I’m saying a man should compensate a female because a man is far more privledged .
@@jenny86516 I addressed it in financial terms because you addressed it in financial terms. I'm right there with you in terms of women's (and men's) being treated unfairly in different contexts. This is why I wrote the book. What I'm saying is based on the context, the people involved must recognize things that are unfair and negotiate terms to make it fair. This is opposed to just blindly and outright giving you more money because you think these things exists entirely outside of the context of your immediate relationship. So what I WOULD encourage women to do is learn negotiation skills and recognize your worth and enter into every agreement as a negotiation. If you don't feel the agreements are fair, opt out of that dynamic or make very specific and clear delineations.
It’s not about that I like how she teaches women about class abd elegance . Women nowadays are classless. Showing too much skin on instragram and long nails . I don’t need to catch a rich man but I watch her video to learn how to to be effortless elegant . I don’t need to wear leggings as pants to be attractive
Hey Bella. I do agree with you in terms of the skills and etiquette she teaches is great! And I pointed that out in the video. My contention was about evolutionary psychology reasoning.
you are honest persons ... I love her.. but I like to know other opinions .. and no one was honest like you... being honest will be your biggest bless I will subscribe to you channel supporting you
My grandfathers and father agree with Anna Bey… And you missed the points she was making entirely lol… Literally the type of man she says we need to avoid which is another basic dude, trying to get a video to go viral by being crazy and using somebody else. 😂 I’m a female engineer who graduated from Berkeley, I have no hangups in my own life education-wise, emotionally or mentally. The less men do and feel compelled to do as men, the less they ARE men by the day… It’s a fact and I can see a lot of that in you as you sit. Evolutionary psychology alone has proven this but there is physical evidence to show that men by the way they live and work has played a huge role in this. 🤣 There is a reason men in cities are effected by all of this worse than those who are further away from cities eating better and living more-so how they always have… Which is caretakers. I love all these relationship experts who all got their start on RUclips.
Wow, you have lips that look just like Anna Bey. I have watched a lot of Anna's videos, and I've never heard her say that women should "rely on a man". She feels that women should be independent and be self-reliant. What she believes is that a man should talk care of their wife because of a lot of reasons. I think you got her all wrong.
@@openrelationships Rone, no they don't evolve to rely on man, you've got it all wrong. Anna and many married women who are influencers say this and I've heard it a lot. They believe that women when married to men shouldn't have to go 50/50 on anything, they believe what once married, a man should be the sole breadwinners of the home and should be responsible for the financial aspect of the home, the wife, and kids. That was a compliment on your lips by the way. Nice and full, very sexy. I don't think it is fair however because not all men can foot the entire bill and they really need that financial help of the women. But ultimately it's up to the women. If she must pay, he is no longer the head and that position is shared 50/50. He has to understand that.
Watching all her videos doesn't change what she says in one video presuming she's consistent. Does she contradict herself in her other videos that would invalidate my argument?
you seem to have made a judgement of her whole youtube content out of that few videos you watched. anyway keep doing what youre doing you seem to be enjoying it anyway. 😊
@@malureemalubay I've made an argument about her evolutionary theory of women's dependence on men for survival. Did you have a reasonable argument for Anna?
i think women still bring children as a choice, we have also the opportunities to have a job, college degree etc,but not every woman want that. we are forced to live a modern life because we were judge in the past and we still are. women in the old days didn´t fight so all women got a college degree and got a 9 to5 job. they changed the laws and society mind so those who want that kind of life could have it. in our society there are still women who love gardening, cooking, making bread and take care of our children, that like to be around their home and enjoy their caretaker role in a family, but few men are still jerks who want a woman so they basically take care of their home, and be there every morning for sex. and still they don´t really want to take care of them, a lot of men want their woman to cook, clean take care of their children and work as well... that is a fact
That's true, so what we teach in relationships management is the idea that all arrangements mustn't be presumed and expectations must be managed. All individuals in relationships must negotiate what they'd like instead of assume the roles in that relationship without knowing what those roles entail.
@@openrelationships it doesn´t matter if you say with honesty what you want, some men would still take advantage,i dated a guy for 6 years! i always said what i wanted + i work too and he still would not provide for absolutely anything,or intentions to commit calling me materialistic for the life i want.totally wrong the way some men take this empowerment and this women rights thing. watching anna bey had made me realize there´s nothing wrong with being a WOMAN and be proud of where you want to get as a wife, mother or profesionist.
@@huntingfashiondolls3307 anytime you enter into a negotiation, you have to consider whether the other person is reliable. Anyone, regardless of their gender, can say they'd provide something within the agreement and not provide it. This is the point you recognize, this person isn't worthwhile of your time, attention and trust, and you give them the most important choice of all: to take it or leave it. Either they do as they'd promise or you'll recognize your time can be better spent elsewhere.
I don't believe they're being scammed by Anna Bey at all. To be a sugar baby and to engage with a high net worth individual in a relationship, which is what I believe she teaches, is not much different.
In her other videos she also teaches women that its okay to be smart get an education and be successful when you are with a successful man so if the man leaves you or passes aren't left without a means to provide for yourself. I don't always agree with everything she says though as it doesn't work for every couple but she validates women who are happy to stay at home and child rear and want to depend on a man. however there are many women who don't want to rely on men though and they face generational poverty and its a proven fact that a western modern culture of two committed loving parents who are married have children who do better in school, are able to get better paying jobs etc. Sociologists have studied this for decades .
I don't disagree with you at all Amanda :) I agree. I like to validate women who want various arrangements whether or not it's reliant on anyone else. My concern was she propagated that women evolved to rely on men. I appreciate your thoughtful comment!
@@openrelationships I also don't agree with how she delivered her message on women need men. As I have been married for almost 9 year I can say I do need my husband to keep working to provide our basic needs and help me with child rearing. However I don't need him to feel fulfilled or feel complete and I'm not naturally a "giver ". I feel like that's an overgeneralization and many women don't feel like this. I take this one with a grain of salt. Women are dependent on men because of societal norms not because of evolution.
@@ah5721 Precisely Amanda! Very wise of you to make that delineation. A partnership in which the agreement involves there is a financial provider and a primary child-rearer is a great one that works terrifically well for everyone involved.
I see you're fine but she is very funny and I have a lot of fun learning from her I'm 64 and I think she's great she's funny I noticed that man are trying to do the same thing she's doing two women appreciation and everything and they are just imitating her. Besides a person besides what to pay attention to. I like her very much and I I'm not trying to capture a man but it's funny how she handles the man topics.
Honestly i have seen her videos and its nice to see and watch but no matter what not all men are the same specially rich guys who has it all .. we dont know whats in their mind but since they have the machineries and all the $$$ they can judge your motives and even how hard to get you are .. if he is for you there will be no more stuggles ..
It'd depend on the agreements in the relationship Auxilia. It's also fair to delegate and offload specific tasks to certain persons based on their specialties, dynamic and things they're good at.
You really have a point. Our original, ancient roles in society still affect us, but we've also changed. Things are not as they were before and men and women are currently living with the highest level of equality that's ever existed throughout history. Obviously it's not perfect, but when there's ever been something perfect and not improvable?
I watched your video with interest :) I have to take issues with some of what you said, though... Yes, AB does imply even state that evolutionary factors determine gender role norms but you were right earlier when you said that society dictates these, not biology in some cases. There are tribes whereby the man virtually does nothing -not even making the money -whilst the women do everything. But that is not the problem with her brand... Anna's course is largely about teaching women how to have their cake and eat it to. She teaches nothing about reciprocity in a relationship, only how to leech by usin manipulative tactics and how to position themselves to find a rich man. Something she has failed to do herself as her persona and profile are manufactured, a lot of her material unoriginal and uncited of its original source material and she is selling an illusion - one that has no bearing on her qualification to teach what she claims to be expert in. She is bad for womanhood for those reasons - teaching them that cheating, leaching, manipulating and being fake is OK - for her viewers/customers and for herself too - not because she is teaching something evolutionarily irrelevant for this modern day and age.
That's an interesting take BG. I don't know enough about her material to make an insightful comment but you might know more into that. I was just pointing out one of her points. If what you say is true, I'm with you!
Anna Bey teaches far more than how to find an affluent man. She teaches femininity, proper etiquette, overall self improvement, and strongly encourages higher education, as well as so much more. When she talks about evolutionary psychology, she's referring to how men are naturally wired to be the hunter. For example; when finding a mate, men like the "chase", so to speak. I've Never seen an example of a woman truly feeling treasured, and adored if She were the one who pursued the man. All of us, male or female, value what we've had to work for far more than if it were just handed to us. However, when it comes to finding a mate, the "masculine male" wants to do the chasing, plain and simple. Think of your own friends. What do you see when it was the woman who did the persuing? Generally, the man will take her for granted in time because he wasn't able to follow his "natural instincts" as the hunter. This applies to relationships that are affluent as well as ones that aren't. I think a man who protects and provides for his female mate undoubtedly feels more masculine, as well as a deep sense of pride. Anna is not saying to women just find a rich man and you're good to go. No, she teaches how to be a high caliber woman with good character yourself so you'll attract a high caliber man who also has good character. She feels strongly about being respectful to everyone, and to be well mannered and kind. But I think we can all agree that if a woman indeed wants a man who Is able to provide for her he will have an easier time doing so if he is affluent, or at least motivated to do what's necessary to provide for his wife and family. You said your comments are based one of her videos you watched, but I encourage you to watch all of her videos so that you can get a better idea of her offerings as a whole.
@@openrelationships she's a gold digger bro. She supports anna because she wants an easy life with a man to bring food to her table without letting her face any responsibilities and duties of a human being.
I'm using my platform within RUclips platform. Criticism about others especially if it's specifically to enlighten others by sharing my contradicting view is merited, because it's within the area of the knowledge I provide. But nonetheless, I did spend some time in the video encouraging others to check out Anna's work. As they say, there is no bad press.
Hi Anna bey teaches truth about how a woman can marry a good strong rich man she's not saying for woman to be stupid. The man must be the man to provide fully for woman can be educated and have a career not be with a slug guy
I have listened to many of Anna‘s videos and you have in my opinion/observation misconstrued her. I find your criticisms unnecessary and unfair to a fellow you tuber.💔
![[BadComedian] - Русские ЭМО СУМЕРКИ (твой личный сорт кринжа)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO_lijyx-No/mqdefault.jpg)
Not only to have affluent man. She helps women see their own value and get better quality of life.
no she doesn't she only teaches people how to stay poor and pretend to be rich
@@mariharrik5987 Well what can we expect from low-value masculine woman like you.
Her main focus is helping women be
More classy. Much needed nowadays.
I actually like most of the things she provides! Definitely over any other "relationship consultants" out there!
@@openrelationships I don't agree with both of you.
She overtly (so it's not a deduction of mine) teaches women how to "rob" a man, use his money while she's dating him, and how to use also his money to prepare post-breakup by pointing what kind of "easy to resell" gifts she must ask for, and more...
you will never hear her talking about a realtionship or inner development, ever!
it's only about : how to catch a rich man, and how to benefit from that.
For a woman to be classy, she needs to get advice elsewhere. not from an escort-like (if not exactly) thief girl.
I'm a traditional man, and I like "REAL" traditional women. As long as both of us play his full expected role (just to be clear, the role of a traditional woman is not only her presence).
But unfortunately, it's not what this person looks like, does, or teaches. it's the opposite. A man who respects himself would bail out instantly if a woman acted only at 10% of what she advises.
I'm only trying to be polite, otherwise I would have described her with only one sufficient word, avoiding all this detailed comment.
Being classy, teach how to be in society, is something! BEING AFTER MONEY WHILE SHE S NOT WORKING BECAUSE SHE DOES CONSIDER THAT THE MALE IS THE PROVIDER. But she is training them to .... got money.
Do some research about her, and you ll find what she was doing before the affluence school. :)
@@willf.8617 She gives tips for marrying a good man that you are in love with. If you dont want to spend money on your couple eventhough women earn less money than men and for pregnancy and maternity issues we have more job difficulties is ok, but dont get angry for Anna to be clever and marry a rich and generous man
@@kiwiverde8592 So I was wrong about the meaning of love. I thought a woman loves the man essentially, not his wallet. so the "cleverness" nowadays, is to ignore all men earning less than millions juste to avoid falling in love with them. Really Really clever ;)
You knew this is called gold digging, not love? didn't you?
I already said I'm a traditional man, and for a woman to be with me in that life-style, she must love my person first, not my assets. a woman that will stand by my side If I loose my money, a woman that will be interested by me even if I'm earning less (not zero, but less) a woman that loves spending time with me at home. A woman expecting only a decent gift every now and then.
the saddest thing with that gold digger teacher, is not only herself (we can read her past on her face), it's the echo that she found in her followers. That shows the sad truth about relationships today.
The funniest part, is that gold diggers now want to substitute this name with "just normal relationship".
Either you don't want to acknowledge that she explains overtly how to "rob" a man, this is very explicit. or you don't see it because you have the same deep nature as this gold digger.
Women can rely on a man without giving up their own ability to rely on themselves. Why not have both?
I advocate having both! :)
@Anon an allowance is a negotiated and legitimate exchange of value. Any person that has the skill to exchange value has the ability to become free.
@Anon value is entirely subjective. For whatever reason, the person providing the allowance finds enough value in her to provide her allowance. And that value could quite literally be anything - which is specific to him. It could be as simple as her time and attention... or it could be as complex as his life being better by her emotional, professional and/or social presence.
@Anon I've become quite flexible from years of diligent training
My husband gives me an allowance on top and separated from my full access to his savings account/checkin/credit cards. In exchange of well nothing. He loves me he trusts me. Nothing wrong with that. I decided NOT to work during pandemic and it’s OK to relay on my man.
He is happy and so I am. Anna doesn’t teach to only relay on a man (unless that’s what you want) she teaches to become a high caliber woman and get a high caliber man.
Hello Rone, i think u didn't watch all Anna's video. I have watch almost all of Anna's video. She didn't mention that women must rely to the man. In fact she has a video stating that women must finish her College degree, get a job and save money.
I love Anna's advices. Such an inspiration to women who wants to level up. She teaches elegance and etiquitte. Specially that not all women born with a good teacher from home. So it is lucky nowadays coz there is Anna who teaches ladies to become elegant woman, strong, wise and classy.
Hey Mau, I think Anna's great! I think what she teaches is awesome and important! My only contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning for how women evolved to rely on men, and while even that's only partly true, it's certainly not true today. I do advocate learning skills she teaches so that women who want to have those skills can use them, and that's great! I have lots of girlfriends who's profession it is to inspire men to provide for their livelihood. I, to some extent, do so as well in a professional manner.
@Mitch Leal how so?
@@openrelationships i think it's better to do what you are supposed to do. What i can see, you have a long way to go compared to Anna. First you build your channel. For that you don't need to criticize others. She doesn't do any criminal activities. People know what she does. Only those who want to follow her , will follow her no matter what.
@@openrelationships and she does not rely on her partner. She has her own career. Teachers teach what they are supposed to teach, it's students responsibility to apply in right place.
@@tiffanyfoster5771 you haven't addressed what I've presented Tiffany. And again, I like the product and service Anna provides except for that one thing.
I watch her videos with no intention of thinking i'll get a rich man, but just that we could all do with being a bit classier, especially in today's vulgar and shameless culture, and this goes for both sexes.
I find her an interesting character definately, and quite misunderstood, she's actually very clever and charismatic.
I could never do her whole thing religiously though, it goes against my natural personality too much, but some of her just general lifestyle tips have been revolutionary for me, really.
I would recommend any woman or even man watch a few of her videos, even just for yourselves rather than to try get a partner.
PS this 100% isn't hate against your video, I actually found it very interesting :) just sort of discussing the topic in general if you know what I mean!
You're absolutely right! A lot of what Anna teaches is especially valuable for women and I always recommend learning skillsets.
I definitely agree with u!
I agree with you. I am a married woman and a new mother, so I watch Anna Bey’s videos without the intention of finding a rich man, but to instead look for tips on how to elevate my wardrobe. She is indeed very charming and refreshing, especially in this era where women like Cardi B are glamorized and praised for their barely there attire.
I agree with you! I also watch her videos to improve my style and embrace more elegance in my life 🙏 But I also find interesting to understand her point of view regarding relationships, it made me less prejudistic against women who choose to be provided by a man 👌
@@veronicaabreu9218 seeing others' perspectives on relationships dynamics even when we don't agree entirely certainly expands our perception of the world ❤️
Anna Bay is from Sweden. I find it interesting how a highly intelligent woman like her has taken a hard look at what she knew to be standard and how she decided to go for the opposite.
If you have been there you know that Sweden basically is run by women and that men act like little boys.
Don't look for any healthy masculinity there.
I'm German and have experienced a country full of German men who want a woman to be the provider and mother and housekeeper so that they can be
irresponsible and uncaring - and feel single any time they want.
I appreciate American men because they really appreciate women and also take their role as protector and provider serious without stifling women.
I am 73 , have been all over the world and published the book "Dating for Commitment TM".
You are a very reasonable person. You did this elegantly and really made some great points without being aggressive about it. Awesome
Thank you Para!
I like how well you've explained your point of view without being rude.
I don't agree with everything Anna says or teaches but I admire her entrepreneurial skills and love seeing how honest she's with her audience.
I think she gets a lot of bad press because people label her as someone who teaches women to bag a rich man.
I think what she really teaches is elegance, etiquette, great manners and as a cherry on top you'll end up attracting an affluent man if you wish so.
I like your arguments though. Great job
You're on point IEVA! Totally right. Thank you!
I don't think she is honest with her audience, otherwise, she would have told about the escorting. schoolofaffluenceisascam.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/167257_124661877602273_520297_n-1.jpg
She't not honest about anything, including her own origins. Do you seriously believe that she is Swedish?
@@diane5140 whether she's Swedish or not doesn't have much to do with what she teaches.
Sure, but the comment was directed at her alleged honesty. If you already lie about something such as your origins, how can I trust everything else you are saying?
As someone who’s watched Anna for a very long time - and taken her classes I can tell you 1000% you have missed the message. Anna is so empowering to women, she has now enabled us to communicate and meet all around the world and have friendships that are so strong and true. As a result we have friendships where we all want to be our best selves. It’s unfortunate you’ve missed the message. As a very happily married and retired lady of affluence I can tell you that Anna has a heart of gold and is nothing but positive in her “teachings”.
I agree Beverly, which is why in my video, I promoted her course and teachings ;)
Why I have the impression that this comment is from Anna 😂
@@qrae9033 it's not impossible 😂
How is she empowering to women where her entire narrative is get a rich he can pay for e everything including the manicure on your hands.
How is encouraging yo be a social climber, only going after men with money empowering.
I like her some of her fashion videos and she has good style. Other than that, her entire marketing is to “level up” so you can be accepted by rich “elite” people and bag a rich and an elite man... it is not about encouraging a woman to depend on herself, work hard and built a successful life as a result. Hunting for a rich man so he can buy you Chanel and Cartier is not empowering.
@@mehreenkhawaja9930 her brand is empowerment in the traditional sense. I'm a man and I still agree with her. She believes all women have a chance at leveling up in the social circle regardless of whether or not one is conventionally beautiful or not. She encourages women to get an education and build a network.
It is for women who seek that lifestyle, but I do not believe she has ever demeaned a man not of the upper class. She just caters to a specific audience.
Anna's concepts do not fit the norms of western society nowadays, but she is a RUclips so her audience is the whole world with diversity. The values that she promote actually match well with some countries or cultures that maybe unfamiliar to you. There's nothing wrong with agreeing or disagreeing because the world is big and you can't expect everyone to have the same values.
Moana, I think a lot of what Anna teaches is very valuable and I encourage anyone who want those skills to take her course. My only contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning behind women's requisite for men's provision.
That's exactly the case in my country India and also in many Asian countries
In my country a man has to come with his family to the girl's family's house and convince them that he has enough money, job and house before the father agrees to give her daughter to him.
@@hellomeloO so he doesn't need her love. He just needs to convince her father that he has enough money. Okay.
@@openrelationships wealth doesn't equate elegance
I love Anna's honesty, A LOT of men actually think the way she does too. However, I do believe women should be content and live wholesome lifes with or without a man, I like your respectful insight 😊
Don't generalise men you golddigger.
I agree, Anna does have some old school mentality that dictates that a woman should rely on a man financially, which is what makes her sound like a gold digger. I definitely don't agree with that and don't follow her opinions on that. I do however like her opinions on class and elegance and leveling up ones lifestyle and quality of life. As an individual, not to catch a rich man.
I appreciate your classy disagreement on her and not just an attack. Thank you. One definitely doesn't need to be "affluent" to be classy.
Absolutely Jesica!
She's not dictating women in any way. In one of her videos she went on to explain about how feminism is about a woman having a choice, so she's not forcing anyone to do anything but you can't deny the fact that not all women want to work AND take care of the house not to mention give birth to and raise children for the sake of this so called 'modern feminism'.
@@yve4889 modern feminism is definitely not fundamentally feminism at all but more like feminazism ;)
@@yve4889 I agree with you. Anna has clearly shown her intentions. It's upto her followers to grab them all or not. She doesn't force anyone. As I can understand, Anna is a major rival to Rone in their industry. That's why he came up with this video. All are grown women. They know what to do to their future.
Plus why don't they look at men who are looking to be golddiggers?
I like how you’re so respectful even though you don’t agree with her. Made it easy to understand the other face of her brand without feeling attacked. Great video!
Thank you Aditi!
From my observation of Anna Bey, I think that she has generated a majority of her income by running her online school. Her previous course cost about $200-300 USD and the new course cost around $1K. In addition, she should be able to generate other income through her professional RUclips channel and other social media outlets. Her yearly revenue should exceed $1 million (my estimation).
There's no mention that she relies on her partner for financial means in recent years. Her partner may give her gifts but I sense that Anna is a bright, career-minded woman and has been supporting herself.
In my opinion, Anna is more of a "hunter".
Women fall for Anna's teachings for all kinds of reasons, but at its core, it is about a deep desire of having a rich, abundant lifestyle, and to be viewed as affluent.
Thanks for that info Fang. I've nothing against her business. I think it's great and good for her. Just a couple of things which I disagree. I'm all for women's independence and those who want to pursue a provider male partner so long as it's appreciated by both parties.
She will never have a Bussiness if her ex is not invested on her... so what kind of “supporting herself” you are talking about?
@@dianprasetyo104 I don't have information on if her ex-partner invest on her or not, so I cannot commend on that.
@@fangfang4298 well if you can assume of how much she makes, then you probably should know about it. She literally said on the interview that her ex invested money to her so that she can have a business.
@@fangfang4298 the kind of “hunting” that she did is to “hunt” a rich partner
I agree with what you said. We evolved to work together!!! Men provide and women also provide! This has always been the case. It is only after the industrial revolution that women started staying at home and men had to be the sole financial provider.
she didnt say women must to rely only on men ....on the contrary, it encourages women to be independent and not cheap and no men to take advantage of them!
What you said here made sense. In fact I try not to be dragged to that part of her mindset that much. I watch her to learn about elegance, but I agree that if you keep watching her for too long it starts taking a toll on your mental sanity and viewpoint
I totally agree!
Anna herself is a very successful business owner (as we can see) so I disagree with the fact that she advocates for complete relliability on the man.
She doesn't advocate for women's complete reliability on men Martina.
No matter men or women, very often we look for comparable partners.
My young brother is an “affluent man” by definition. He said: if he has $1b, he would at least date a girl who has $100m.
1 billion is not comperable to 100million tho
Hi Rone. You're content is great. However, I must point out that at any point Anna does not ever say that women must and 'need' to rely on men. As someone that has pretty much seen almost all her videos - (since I've been following her for serveral years now), and that is why I like her so much, because in my opínion; She shares how one can and should be independent. And never rely on a man because you never know what can happen and as elegant women we should always be prepared in case the relationship doesn't work out. And also, what she does often point out is that women, although being independent and provides for herself, should still not allow the man to let her pay for dates etc. And she does work for herself as you mentioned her school of affluence. And also her successful youtube channel. So honestly I don't see where she pushes women to only rely on affluent men. She encourages women to not fall for 'false equality' between the man and the women when the woman does everything (cook, clean, take care of thier children plus work outside of the home) -- and all that most men do, not all men but most, just work and does not even help with anything else. So yes she does tell and empower women not to believe and fall for this 'false fairness', "equality stuff". The reason being is that it does not happen - that is not equality. And yes besides this she also does empower women to let the man pay for basically everything. But that does not mean she isn't making money for herself or that she isn't adding value to the relationship in many other ways. (If you see more of her videos you will be able to find out more about what she really teaches and can have a better conclusion and understanding 😉). Much love, take care. 🌺
@Shining Star - I agree with your assessment.
This the most constructive and well-researched commentary I've seen so far about Anna Bey's School of Affluence. Thank you for this. 🙏
Thank you for that comment! I appreciate it.
I, too, agree. Communication is essential in relationships, most especially now with the global exposure of different cultures. Maturity expected from each other includes a capacity to take responsibility for the needs of the family and it takes both parents' to work on it together. Raising children who will help build a better world is the work of heroes - they are the parents now.
Men role is to be a protector and a provider. Women role is to be a nurturer, raising children and house with help, of course. It hasn’t changed. Men just don’t accept that role no longer as long women are in the work force having their own career and now making more income than men. Men have becoming more feminine and women has becoming more masculine. As a feminine female, I prefer a masculine male. No matter how successful I am in my career, I I prefer a man that are protector and provider. These men are more desirable.
I am a fan of Anna Bey.
@@radianceface5107 That's certainly, and originally, what society has propagated for a long time. What I propagate is women's independence - that women can find security in themselves if they choose to and can provide for themselves. I'm also not saying that the male as a provider can't be arranged. I'm certainly a big proponent for clearly communicated arrangements!
@@openrelationships you are a person to be reverred dude. Such a logical person❤️
I prefer men who will love me. I can earn and provide for myself.
@@snehachakrabarti.5092 thank you! 😍
My problem with Anna Bey is that she throws men under the bus and seems to equate the only value of a man in a relationship and as a person is in what material possessions he has. In one of her videos qbout why she'll never pay for the date she explicitly states that the only way a man expresses his masculinity is by providing. Being a man is about more than just providing.
There's a very good reason mental health among men is neglected and attitudes like hers is one of the contributers.
I haven't heard or known her to say that but if she did say that, it's a horrific outlook and definitely will profoundly influence what she propagates to other women
Btw I think she's all for being financially independent as a woman. Having your own education and income. Finding a classy man is not a means to get food on the table. I think this stuff about a man paying for a date is only to make sure he's feeling the cost of dating in order to filter out people who don't value you.
I dont like this man at all
I couldn’t agree more
She has always advocated for women to have independence, including financial independence, to be able to leave a man at any point required, such as controlling or abusive relationships.
I was referring to her recent video on her evolutionary psychology reasoning of how women evolved to rely on men. Otherwise, I like most of the things she propagates!
Or leave him incase his empire falls apart 🔥
Hi Rone, i appreciate your concerns and you points. I have been following Anna Bay from her first video, she has never forced or told women to completely rely on men, what she is trying to teach is for women to aim high and level up in all aspects of their lives and not to settle for whats mediocre. She teaches etiquette, how to conduct your self with good behaviour, values and how to develop self worth and self love. Cultures may have evolved in other parts of the world but not all the world, Im coming from Zambia, Africa were women respect men who are providers because its just by nature. I feel its okey to have women who want affluent men and they should not be judged. Anna Bay's programme has been very beneficial to women and will support her through
I appreciate that Esther and I also recognize that about Anna. My contention was her evolutionary psychology reasoning for women's having to be dependent on men, which you seem to also believe although not surprising since you've followed her all along ;)
Let me simplify this...Nobody looks for average things in life...both gender looks for Best option for themselves.. And especially women looks for a man who's superior to her... Bcoz God or universe has created the man ...masculine energy to protect his partner ..n if man can't take responsibility of partner... Then we are missing the basic main point .. But most importantly woman can take care of themselves but we look for the partner who is the real man to offer his partner a choice ... Freedom to choose if to work or not...It's about having evolved person....Man.. ! Such men We can find it mostly in particular society..that is affluent society....!
Hey Anuradha! I understand a feminine individual whether if it's a male or female likes to have as a sexual partner someone who's more masculine, and take on masculine traits.
I've got nothing against women that like to have a male security provider so long as they recognize that security is something they can have for themselves. At the minimum, she must recognize that her security comes from her ability to survive and influence others to contribute to her survival. This is why, like Anna Bey, I like to teach skill sets.
On the other hand, if a woman were to only look to her partner for security, she'll always remain a slave. If she were to have that sense of security for herself, she can make arrangements with any man and have the skills and therefore control of her own life to be able to leave when she's not appreciated.
Yes Rone...Anna bey is mainly focused on finding most capable potential partner... In which she indirectly teach to become a best version of yourself... In which she also focus on working on something for Self...like she herself working on her soul person .... you focused on teaching skills for individual development for most evolved life & society... At the end we all have different soul purpose for healthy society ... We must understand this & work together for creating healthy society...bcoz what all that matters is good intentions... & I see that Rone's & Anna's intention is good & pure ... You Both rocks .... N you both share knowledge ...positivity & hope ...👍
@@anuradhasonawane9644 Thank you for that! I agree with you! I like most of what Anna teaches and recommend women who want those skills to check out her course!
@Anon Billionaire need a high quality woman...who earn great respect !
Not at all: affluent men can be as rude and stingy as any other men. Is not about being affluent (she uses the word "rich" instead BTW...)
As a woman who worked as a massage therapist in a wealthy town for a decade, I can attest with complete confidence that most, if not ALL of those soccer moms were riding on the checkbook of their husbands. The only difference is that Anns Bey openly admits that this is the norm for the wealthy. The women I met didn't talk openly about it and downplayed it by telling me how much they " run around town volunteering".🙄
And let's be clear, it's a rare occurrence when the man stays home with the kids and the woman is the breadwinner.
Certainly! I agree. In fact I love that what Anna Bey provides help to those women whom would like to learn skills that men who'd like those sorts of arrangements require, and there are plenty of them. This is a good thing. I'm a proponent for and advocate of well-arranged marriage. My contention isn't about that particular arrangement but rather the evolutionary psychology reasoning she provides.
@@openrelationships There is truth to the idea that men and women are fundamentally different biologically in ways that determine their behaviors. This has been proven over and over by evolutionary psychology, and it's why dating coaches tell women to never chase a man. He's the hunter! And let's consider that when a man is out of work, it hits his self-esteem and self-worth much harder than it does a woman. Women don't usually attach their identity to a career like men do. Women have a multi-faceted view of themselves because being a "provider" isn't driving them as much as having a full life. But if you ask a man who he is, his profession is at the forefront of his response. Not that he's a dad or husband or fixes up classic cars.
My mother's generation fought for women's rights and won them. Unfortunately, the pendulum swung too far into feminazi territory and have created Beta males who have been shamed into stepping aside so their wives can take the lead. This infantilizing of husbands has created unhappy marriages and divorce. Then when the woman goes back out in the dating world in her 40s, she wants an alpha because she realizes that she fought against her feminine nature her entire 20s and 30s, trying to boss and lead, not realizing that it destroyed the man's ego and sex drive. We can wish all day long that men and women are the same, but we never will be the same and in fact, our attraction to each other is because we're fundamentally different.
@Lady Bohemia - TY. You tell it like it is.
@@transitionsnc I'm delighted you commented on this because it seems I've missed her comment! She points out lots of errors and ironies which I'm going to point out now.
@@Mmmmkaaay Thank you for providing this substantial comment! I really appreciate it as you voice out the important ideas that others haven't had the chance to explore! So thank you for that.
I'd like to point out the ironies in your comment one by one, for posterity, and would appreciate your thoughts.
I absolutely agree men and women are driven differently and it's this very premise and the misunderstanding about it that's the cause of most of the problems in relationships which I do my best to "enlighten" - to shed light on.
Dating coaches all over the world provide unbelievable mistaken advice and ironies. I've been one for the better part of a decade. In evolutionary psychology, there are many theories and some more reasonable than the dominant one for different reasons. Just to point out the irony in your statement, it ISN'T necessarily that men are hunters and evolved as hunters that they'd prefer the woman don't pursue them, but may have more to do with the area of the brain that makes it so men and women don't appreciate "connection" in the same way. Women for example connect by sharing information without requiring a point. Men don't connect in that way. This also doesn't go to tell you that if a woman were to approach a man that it wouldn't be an attractive thing - and in fact it would! There are OTHER reasons women don't do it which has nothing to do with hunter gatherer psychology.
About men's identity based on his profession, is a theory you can't prove. It also doesn't negate women's identity being connected with her profession. It could very well be a matter of her choosing to have offspring and not having her profession outside of child-rearing as anything significant to her since they can arrange for the other partner (male or female) to provide that aspect of the relationship.
I just want a man who will love me love my children. Will love me and think I’m beautiful even if I’ve been taking care of the kids all day and haven’t had a chance to eat let alone put on make up and dress up in fancy clothes.I don’t care if I fit in with snobby rich people and worry about what handbag I carry or if I choose to wear leggings when I finally get a day off from work. I want real friends that I can be myself with and not have be be fake.
If you don't let yourself go to pot, there'll be a long line of men who'll love you. Take care of your health and well-being.
I don't recall her saying that women should rely on men. She advocates etiquette, social graces and being selective of the type of man we want in our lives. Men need to earn a place in our lives, respect our boundaries, and behave decently. No woman wants to be with a man who she needs to support or behaves badly.
Well said
I would like to present my opinion in the most respectable way possible and say that Anna under no circumstances is teaching women or young girls anything about relying on men. Unless you consider a woman helping other women dress better easily. 😃😄😁
I came across with your video randomly and I watched for curiosity
I have been following Anna because I find her teachings about class, elegance and self value very useful regardless the infamous wealthy husband search that drives everybody crazy
But I must say she is right when she recomends to every woman to set boundaries and respect herself getting out of her life a low quality man that consumes all her energy, resources and youth
For men is easy to keep themselves in their comfort zone while women have to deal with more responsabilities that practically nobody see or appreciate, as a result we age faster than men and get exhausted and angry easily
Our body an mind are always attached to hold, care and nurture others and that implies a high cost for us (both, physically and mentally) by the other hand men are free of this and is socially acceptable
Unless you decide with your partner to have no children, hire a maid to be in charge of the house work and as a couple have the same amount of incomes dare to speak about equality! Only in that conditions I could say is fair to expect 50/50
I apologize for my English, is not my first language
You wrote better English than many natives
@evelyn castillo good English to me
I think she's embarrassing and disempowering to all women but it's nice that you are open to her antidisestablishmentarianism.
It is incredibly sad that many men feel offended about her videos, confidence and self esteem issues? Maybe.
They say that when you talk bad about someone else, you are speaking louder about yourself.
Not to mention you are only focusing in one of her topics, she has thousands of women to become better versions of themselves with discipline, education, and awareness of our own flaws.
Cinthia, what you say is only relevant when the argument is against the individual rather than a position they've presented. In this case, I've made clear what Anna Bey provides is a good product for women looking for the skill sets she teaches. I strongly recommend it!
What I Disagree on is specifically the evolutionary reasoning behind it.
You’re absolutely right!! This guy is extremely ignorant
@@abigailhart3279 How so?
He is not offended!!
I think nothing wrong with her videos. It’s all about self improvement regardless dating rich guy or not. Nobody wanna date crashy people. PERIOD
I didn't say all her videos were bad. I think they're valuable. Perhaps you didn't see my argument or watch the video?
She does NOT teach women they MUST rely on a man.
She teaches to find a man they CAN rely on and who does NOT think of it as something special.
A man who has no problem to live by it no matter what the circumstances are.
She takes it for granted that women have an education, are well rounded and have made their own money.
She is a great example of that.
The world is full of women who believed that love is all you need and that money does not matter.
They are the ones driving cars that fall apart, have roommates because they can't afford the rent and have a hard time to afford child care.
Today more than ever it's easy for men to disappear and leave a women to deal with the problems and kids he leaves behind.
And men do it all the time. Just talk to people who work for child support agencies.
Hello Rone, i honestly respect your views about it, I have been watching her videos only for me to elevate my look , on how to dress classy especially on a budget, if there is something she mentioned about "relying on a man" .... I think thats personal choice .... i actually dont agree with that, but she has helped a lot of women to elevate their personal style & proper etiquette....
I don't understand why you'd make an entire video criticising Anna just because she intimates towards evolutionary psychology. Her teachings are much broader than that.
I've watched many of Anna's videos. I think she has a lot of point and shes helping a lot of women to carry themselves in a modest and respectable manner which many women these days don't possess anymore because mainstream media has society believe in everything it publishes.
Coming from a 3rd world country, the Philippines. Where many women and their children suffer poverty. In others' view being dependent on men is weakness. Means weakness for us women. But many situations put us women to dependency. And sometimes we dont have much choice. In the Philippines, that is true. Being able to better yourself in all facets, even just how a woman carries herself puts her in a positive and beautiful light that attracts the right crowd. Eventually the right and suitable man who also has made himself prepared and ready for manly responsibilities including but not limited to ensuring his family's needs are met. Many average men in the ph gives life to babies they cant feed.
Ill-breeding causes problems, when marrying into a family of a man whose parents or family value class, elegance and finesse. Being able to transition from being mainstream and middle class to class and grace is priceless. Has saved family ties from being broken.
You have a point. But I think being able to adjust and play between the social class spectrum is always a plus.
I watch all of anna's video...she never said woman have to rely on man...never...
She said it's our right want to have career or not.but she advice woman to have career and education,bcos there is a time we have to stand up alone& independent 100% .
she just educate woman who is interested entering affluence society .and how to make yourself proper to get affluence husband .
What you've said is mostly correct! Although she did say women evolved to rely on men for resources.
Women and men must rely on a man for CERTAIN THINGS! Each have certain strengths and weaknesses. As a team with respect for each other, men and women will succeed much better working together.
Anna does both - she encourages self-reliance and healthy inter-dependence.
Anna does do both Rene. I agree. My only contention was her evolutionary psychology premise.
And you're right. Just like any team or partnership, it's better to play on each other's strengths rather than rely upon their weaknesses. Ultimately, this is all better communicated at the outset of any relationship, personal or professional, instead of presuming expectations.
it makes a difference whether the man brings home the resources and the woman uses them to create something for the community and takes care of the family with devotion, or whether a man brings resources home so that the woman can buy handbags and shoes for herself. All that so that she does not leave him, because she has deserved this luxury as a self-proclaimed "high value woman" (with nothing) and for this she lets him participate in her body in retreat.
I agree Luna. Although depending on the man, even merely having her presence and companionship as a 'value-exchange' is value enough and worthwhile and good for them.
I think she’s right but some people don’t want to look too expensive in a yoga class
Most wealthy women are wealthy because of a husband, father Etc. She's right. To get ahead they must rely on men. Single women are not independently wealthy bro.
A woman can be financially independent without having to rely on a man. I believe it’s mainly fulfilling a desire of a man’s true nature to feel needed, provide, be capable and be appreciated for what he can do for the woman. So if a man should pay, doesn’t mean that woman is relying on him. Just that the ‘masculine energy’ feels good that its innate purpose in a relationship is being fulfilled by the ‘feminine energy’.
If you are not watching all of her videos, you are not qualified to pass these judgements. You really need to watch the rest of them because your first complained is not even an issue. She teaches ladies to NOT be dependant on men. You missed her ENTIRE teaching by making your choices based on a "few" videos.
Thank you and have a nice day.
Hey Murphy! Thanks for finding this video and taking the time to comment. Your concern is common in terms of the comments I receive on this video. To argue that I'd need to watch all her videos to make an educated comment is a very poor position. It's tantamount to watching a fella say 1+1=3 and having to watch all his videos to make a correction. So like I've repeatedly assured people in the comments section, if she were consistent with what she says, then I wouldn't need to watch all her videos, unless she says completely contradictory things in all her videos, which I don't believe she does.
What I think you missed Murphy was my argument against her evolutionary reasoning that women evolved to rely on men for survival. You only need to hear that once from someone to recognize you won't have to see all their videos to see if they're consistent.
Her focus is not for those women who want to be like men. She is dealing with women who don't want that! Her services are needed!
I agree. This is why I say in the video repeatedly to check out her course ;)
I love the way you agree to respectfully disagree with her views.. & the points that you made are spot on!! I am an independent women, but I am a stay at home mama of 3 beautiful babies & a married to an amazing man who is obviously our sole provider!! Thank u for such a graceful, respectful video!! It sure is refreshing!!
Thank you for that delightful sense of appreciation. You're amazing!
Try 1.25x speed
I already did 👍
Men are amazing and when you choose to have a relationship, there are some basics she covers. I don’t think it’s evolution but basics on how men and women relate to one another.
I would want my man to be masculine and a provider and stuff like that and I of course have no problem playing my role in that relationship. Meaning showing intimacy and showing love towards my man. So I understand why some people don’t like her although you never really know her relationship with her partner maybe she shows him intimacy but doesn’t speak of that on her channel
I, for one, like Anna. I was just make a critical distinction and disagreement of one of her perspectives about men and women's roles in relationships that she referred as evolutionary psychology. Masculinity, has nothing to do with providership. I have nothing against any gender being the provider and a woman's being the primary provider, if that's the case, isn't necessarily making her masculine or a "man of the house" or whatever the colloquial term would be. It just makes her a powerful, wonderful, and effective woman.
Rone John - Relationship Expert oh yeah me too I watch her all the time. And yes a woman being a provider has to be done sometimes say like a single mother. I get how that doesn’t make her masculine but when it comes to a romantic relationship I don’t think a woman should be a provider. And in my opinion a quality of a masculine man is a provider especially when he’s in a romantic relationship with a woman. When it comes to romance I don’t think women and man are equal.
@@thedollreviewerI don't believe anyone is equal regardless of gender since everyone has their own specialties and experiences - although I believe everyone deserves equal opportunity. Aside from that, your *preference* is a male provider and that's great and if you can communicate that with a partner as an arrangement, that's very good for you and of you. Yet again, when it comes to providership, it's got nothing to do with gender or femininity or masculinity IF you want actual freedom. There are plenty of women who are fantastically feminine and make a lot more money than their partner who are free not because they're the provider but because they don't live in the "male as a provider" gender role that society has programmed into men and women.
Rone John - Relationship Expert I think I can understand what your saying. When it comes to relationships it’s not just men and women anymore and it’s more diverse.
@@thedollreviewer That's very wise :D
Im all for more classy women but you do not have to have nose job, fake eyebrows, dyed hair and plump lips to get a man or even an affluent man. You need manners, natural as possible beauty and a great personality. As well as be independent. Thats all im sayin. Trying to look a certain way may draw you to him but eventually fakery will make you lose him. But whatever
Great perspective. Thanks for sharing.
Not at any time does this lady consider the nourishment and development of the female brain. She seems to think that the purpose of the female skull is restricted to wearing a hat and getting a great blow dry at the hairdresser rather than housing the most fantastically developed organ. It saddens me to my core to listen to this enormous emphasis on appearance. I have never in my whole life considered using a man to increase my prosperity because I believe that I am as capable as the next man and I value myself in my entirety. Although my appearance is beautiful I am much more impressed by the development and quality of my intelligence and how I relate to fellow members of my species. Now that is real elegance . It could never be improved upon by wearing a Designer handbag. Sadly, she also reduces a man to his most basic form, valuing only the appearance of the female form. She thinks she can fool a thinking man so easily. A man who is attracted so easily is lost just as easily to the next woman playing the same game. She degrades both men and women. So sad to see this in our time. I guess we have to accept that women like this exist accounting for her online popularity. Good luck to them and I wish them well but they may pass on this mode of thinking to their female progeny leading to a higher risk of under achievement and may result in minimising potential of their offspring.They drag women back to a mind set we have struggled so hard to escape. Maybe, this is the limit of their ambition, being an appendage to a wealthy man because it is all they are capable of achieving. The irony of this enormous focussed drive to appear “elegant” and “expensive” unfortunately results in the direct opposite. These women reduce themselves to obviously discounted commodities incapable of existing in their own right and inevitably they look so cheap and synthetic. What a world we live in? We are born with class it cannot be purchased, it exists in our minds and the rest follows naturally. To be the Mistress of our own destiny is a great human ambition and hopefully one day all women will understand the value of this and the lazy,ignorant, backwardness of tricking a man into paying for us for the rest of our lives will be recognised as the most shameful of human aspirations confined to the history books of female evolution. Until such time we must protect ourselves from the easy ideology of free loading and living off another’s successful financial efforts.
I wonder if this lady has considered what will happen when she ages and the husband who will still be wealthy (if she hasn’t squandered his wealth on her worthless handbags and shoes) decides he wants a younger more “elegant” and “expensive” looking model? I suppose she will divorce him and steal the remainder of his assets. Check mate. Bravo!
If appearance and affluence is not important for you, why would you even listen?
She teaches about life transformation.
I don't disagree with you ;)
I think she talks about one aspect of life , that’s about love, romance and thinking of having a long run relationship with man, not about careers or all aspects of life
I don't doubt it Sumaira
Dope commentary fam 🤧💯
Thanks Owolabby!
1000%. Some bright minds in this comment section
No. She doesn't teach us to rely on the man but she helps us to find a high quality man. Nowadays many men are so financially unstable compare to women and there are women out there who pay everything for the men. And FYI most of her videos r not only men but to upgrade our appearance to be better n classy.
Yes Lo. This video didn't say she teaches women to rely on men.
I love her. My reasons are to look and carry myself well and feel better about my fashion choices and manners. As a married women, all her teachings regarding the two things I mentioned above have been very beneficial
You didn’t get it... it’s not about getting an affluent man.
It’s the teaching about NOT DATING a man who is not willing to give to his woman the feeling that she potentially could rely on him.
It’s a biological fact that the feeling to become financially responsible for the family causes stress for the woman and thus doesn’t support her to relax in her femininity.
Ok, but what if there are no family plans yet for the couple, you would ask. Well, the pillar of a relationship is sexual attraction. Feminine (not feminine looking) women don’t feel attracted to men who are treating them in a way that doesn’t allow them to relax. How does a woman relax the best? When she wouldn’t have to worry about financial problems. Never. How can she make sure she doesn’t have to? Being with a man who in worst case would be willing to provide and care for her. When women are single they take care of both, the frame of financial security for themselves and the comfort. It works fine! The are financially independent.
What happens when the are in a relationship? They want to give love, providing comfort. To do it in the best way possible, they need to rely on the overall security, the financial frame.
In some couples it’s not the finance that is this frame, it may be physical engagement of a man building a home for a family that can also give this feeling of security.
To make it simple it’s that:
The magic happens when
THE MASCULINE PROVIDES SECURITY:
The feminine can trust -> woman happy -> woman opens truly -> man gets sex and love -> man happy ->> BOTH HAPPY 😊
It’s so simple.
You can even go do far to say that SECURITY is the only biologically attractive for a feminine woman. If it’s not the case, then it’s not the feminine woman. Or not in her feminine phase in life.
Security can be seen in different ways:
Some feel secure because a person has a strong appearance, able to risk, to fight for sth, able to somehow find solutions and to provide. Women provide this kind of security as single mothers, as singles for themselves etc.... but the ONLY WAY they are sexually attracted is when for once they don’t have to provide this security.
I grasp precisely what you're saying Maria. There is no such thing as 'getting' * any * person but rather about what is the dynamic constituted within the relationship and the agreements negotiated. I'd never encourage any woman enter into a relationship where she doesn't get what for her would be a deal-breaker. In other words Maria, if your requiring you must feel you can rely upon someone for whatever reason you'd like is a requisite for you to enter into an arrangement, then you must voice it out, communicate it, make that clear agreement and ONLY enter that relationship when it's understood.
Your theory, which you're presuming to be fact, that the woman requires financial reliability outside of herself for her to feel feminine is just that, theory, and a poor one. PLENTY of women don't require any financial requirement from her partner for her to be wondrously feminine.
You mention the pillar of a relationship is sexual attraction. That's true in a very small sense. It's a very small way to look at a relationship. When you look at relationships and the foundations it's based in, begin with the premise that * a relationship * is how you interact and interface with any entity AND THEREFORE it's the arrangements and dynamics that you ESTABLISH at the outset that is THE PILLAR of that relationship. In other words Maria, LOTS of relationships don't require sexual attraction to work fantastically well such as arranged relationships were the goal is things outside of love.
I'll leave it at that for now. Perhaps when you fix your frame of how relationships are constituted could you appreciate the things that make it wonderful and successful.
@@openrelationships Thank you for your detailed response!
So we totally agree on this point "then you must voice it out, communicate it, make that clear agreement and ONLY enter that relationship when it's understood". And what Anna is teaching, is EXACTLY THAT. She teaches, how to communicate that "clear agreement". Why does it may sound harsh for some people? Because maybe men and women who are already have the tendency to dominate and voice out by their character, don't need this motivation. For them its natural to stand up for their rights in relationships. Of course they make completely different experiences with men. For example, when I date the so called Mr. Nice Guy or a passive man, then there is no risk to be manipulated by him into an arrangement that would harm me. An no, not only the weak women who need therapy get manipulated. Also strong intelligent women get manipulated because they want to open their hearts, invest in feelings and then it gets more difficult for the harmony seeking types of women (the mostly "feminine" types) to reestablish the arrangement that is fair for them. So Anna is helping only THESE kind of WOMEN, the ones who want to be able to play the feminine part in the relationship (not in the job or elsewhere).
What is FEMININE? I think this is where women start to feel triggered ;) As I did too, btw ;)
A feminine body is different to a masculine. It works different because of the hormones and the hormones affect a lot the emotions, obviously. Hormones can be influenced by the external factors like stress etc. So people can adapt to circumstances and in this way develop feminin or masculine Features. What do you consider as masculine features? (Warning, Please don't feel triggered ;))
In EXTREMES I would say,
*FEMININE is the floating, soft way of acting, the more passive settled mother like ;) empathic and harmony-oriented, way to interact with people, sense for creativity and comfort
*MASCULINE is in contrary to be goal-oriented, focused, proactive etc.
No one in the modern world can be successful to follow the masculine or feminine hormones to 100% all the time. We need both every day! Some days require from men to be 98% feminine. And its great that they are able to do so. Sometimes we woman are happy to live to 90% in our masculine, especially when we felt suppressed in our feminine roles or we experienced how women are being suppressed in the past. We want to balance it out. Its natural. (Yes, I speak out of experience ;)) We are driven by he need to get into a balance in our life that feels right in the moment. Many women (NOT ALL, please!) nowadays feel the need to be able to live in there feminine within a relationship. And this is the only audience of Anna Bey.
To answer to the other Points:
It is NOT my theory "that the woman requires FINANCIAL reliability outside of herself". I was saying that it is a feminine feature to require SECURITY in the areas where it is important to her. For some women, its the loyalty, for some others its a home, for some others its luxury and for others its values like to be eco-friendly, child-friendly or whatever makes her feel secure and makes her relax, because she can trust. There are different life experiences and personal preferences. Lets not judge these preferences.
Yes, I agree, sexual attraction is not THE pillar but one of several pillars in a healthy relationship. There are well-working couples who don't have sex. Of course! Again, preferences are different. I was talking about those, for whom its is important. In this case the attraction is important, you must agree. But I have the impression you consider this attraction as sth superficial. This is not what I am referring to. I am referring to the attraction to a person that you feel as a result of his/her actions. Which doesn't have to lead to sex but just makes you shine and want to make effort and make this person happy. Which again is very close to the platonic attraction.
See, I want to feel attracted to people who are close to me, family members, friends, etc... But isn't it another thing to also feel attracted to my partner? Would I feel attracted to him/her when she behaves like my child? Maybe. But we do notice what kind of behavior attracts us the most. We deserve to look for that exact way to feel attracted to our partner and not judge others for their preferences.
Anna Bey is speaking for only a group of women who have the same preferences as her.
Let's not judge the tastes of others, look and listen more precisely the message of people, question our own trigger points and try not to think in stereotypes.
Anna Bey spreads a very important feminist message such as "The right to choose the life a woman wants without being judged". She doesn't teach to hurt anyone but to live a happy and fulfilling life. Anyone who doesn't feel addressed, doesn't have to even react. Like I wouldn't react to a video that teaches me how to train your muscles after an injury which I didn't have. I would understand, "Ok, this video should help XYZ, I am not XYZ, so what do I know?"
I appreciate the exchange with you. You seem very nice btw ;)
@@mariahoffmann2211 I'll address each of your remark in turn Maria. From time to time, since this video has gained traction, I've watched it over several times, and noticed I promoted Anna Bey A LOT in this video and in fact have repeatedly stated, what she provides is valuable and I recommend anyone who want the outcome she promotes to check out the particular skill sets she teaches because they're VERY useful. I only make the disclaimer that any one who receives any information discern them with critical observation and think for yourself. Take what's useful and throw out what's not.
And you've even shed light on the irony that I provided! While Anna teaches women to be discerning women to empower them, the only contention I was pointing out in the video is the * innacuracy * of her evolutionary psychology reasoning of women's reliance upon men and the disempowering identity you get from that if you believe it.
Be wary of what you consider as theories and facts because it's self-deception. In truth, the more you know, allows you to recognize VERY FEW things are indeed facts. You're asserting the requisite for security outside of * her self * is a feminine trait.
This is, and has been, what's propagated throughout society throughout time - most of which has been spent where women has always been seen as property of men. RECOGNIZE that the IDEA "ownership" is JUST an idea that hadn't existed before the agricultural era and only came into existence when humans recognized they needed the concept of "owning" land to propagate society and in the same token the inheritors of these lands. As a result, came about the notion that JUST LIKE you put seed into fertile soil and you get "product", you put seed into fertile woman and you get "product" in which would inherit "your" land and therefore humans came about ways to having to * own * their women so they could know their children were their own.
So throughout time immemorial, women have always been seen as property and propagated as property which is the reason she inherits the family name of the man during the sale contract (ie marriage contract) from father to her new owner: "husband".
So I work at empowering women to recognize she's a completely free individual. In fact, what separates women from girls is that a woman recognizes that her sense of security comes strictly from herself alone. There are women that are young of age and there are girls at older ages.
@@openrelationships Im starting to get the impression, that you may not read my words correctly (maybe I'm expressing myself badly).
In no way is Anna Bey teaching women to become dependent on men! If you dont agree with the feminine/masculine theory, its ok. It takes time to identify your femnine and masculine side, its a process that we dont need to talk further about.
So taking away the idea of gender traits, if you listen carefully to Anna you will notice that what she is teaching, is simply how to enter a fair partnership. "Fair" in her sense and in the sense of her followers. When you are entering a partnership, no matter what kind of partnership, lets say its a project, you want to know - for the duration of the project - that you can rely on your partner in her/his responsibilities, don't you? Its suggested for every start-up to sign a contract with their business partners in the eraly stage. Why? Because it give a sense of SECURITY.
Does that make you dependent on your partner? In a way, yes, but only as long as you expect him or her to "do the job". If you prject partner is sick or whatever, you are still able to do the job yourself. Anna is always stresses the part that women need to stay "independent" - which means to stay ABLE TO LIVE ALONE in a good way.
Understand, that yes, every modern person should be able to feel secure by him or herself. Think on when you are travelling alone, you take care of the navigation and enjoy the landscape all by yourself which is great. But then you meet someone who is guiding for a bit and all of a suddon you see things diffrently, more intense and flourish. And you may have more time to get a more detailed look on details, the tastes, the language etc.. Are you becoming dependent a lose your dignity because of that? No, right?
Anna teachings are in no sense differnt to what people in business learn how to build teams, how to communicate, how to negociate. In addition, yes its important to also speak about what seems fair for the women she is adressing. Are you a feminine woman? Are you a masculine man?
To understand her message, maybe its easier to free yourself from history and the complexes of our societies that are different in the world as well. I understand perfectly why you are referring to the history, its interesting. Ive read the book "sapiens" as well and I see why you think its important for the topic. Its interseting to know indeed. What helps women now, are suggestions how a marriage could work IN A MODERN WORLD OF HIGH SOCIETY. She is mostly adressing to women who ALREADY ARE INDEPENDENT and reponsible in their single life but wish MORE than that. This concept is obviously only interesting to men who also alraedy "have achieved it all" in a materialistic sense, but look for love with a woman of his standards.
Maybe I see the things from the eyes of a modern and free society and surrounding, growing up with the idea, that every person (men or women) create their own life and are responsible for it by themselves. For me as for Anna's followers, probably different to YOUR AUDIENCE, this is a natural fact that doesnt need any more explanation.
I just wanted to point out that how some comments put her teachings in a wrong light instead of really trying to understand her perspective.
You and Anna have similar goals, to empower women! Thats a great mission and you should support one another!
Anna's audience is strong and independent women who want a relationship with a man who can be EVEN STRONGER!
Your audience needs impowerment to become independent and strong in the first place.
So this is why obviously you stress on different things even if your values are probably not completely different in relationships.
No no she's using New Age ideology, not evolutionary psychology. I think she picked a raisin or 2 from the evo psych cake to suit a particular argument but other than that I have only seen New Age ideology in her videos. It's nice to be classy but the new age is basically a destructive trap.
I like her,style,tips,I m a person.men s jobs,making my way in man s world,its very difficult not to adapt to masculism. I m still feminine. And many things she does,I already do.
Thank you for respectfully presenting your opinion about Anna Bey’s teachings. I also disagree with her interpretation of evolutionary psychology in regards to male-female relationships. In my opinión, part of being an empowered woman is being able to decide the type of relationship we have with men and how we will provide for ourselves. If a woman decides that she wants to live off men, and she actually can get a man to take care of her, kudos to her! She was able to get the life she wanted, in the way she wanted. I respect that woman’s decision and, as an empowered woman-even though I would never make that choice for myself-I would defend that woman’s right to live life on her own terms (as long as she is honest about what she is doing and not calling herself an “elegant lady”) But, it must be clear to all that this was the choice this woman made, not her destiny or her only option.I believe that Anna Bey’s argument about the evolutionary dynamics of male-female relationships is disproven by the fact that she is on RUclips making her own money instead of letting her affluent man take care of her. In my eyes, this sole action contradicts her public discourse on the evolutionary nature of men-women relationships and makes her advice very unauthentic.
I believe Anna is been miss understood. She wants women to be elegant and educated, at the same time if you want to married a rich man, why not. She also encourage women to get educated and have her own carrier
I don't doubt that and that's great!
Great job on getting your point across in such a polite manner!
Thank you Aida!
80% of women would choose a partner from only 20% of the men. And this is for a good reason! Men are not like this at all. Actually you agree with Anna Bay, not disagree. She's not teaching women to have a certain mindset. She is trying to help women, who already have this mindset, not to make mistakes and look cheap, while wearing expensive brands. Because expensive and elegant are not the same. 😜
I agree with you!
I dont follow Anna for the reason you describe. I dont think that it is a good idea to plan your life on relying on a man when it comes to finances. That is very dangerous because these narrow gender roles come with negative consequences and it is what our ancestors were trying to get away from. i do not think she empowers women. I think she teaches women a very narrow way of living, to find a rich man, dress a certain way. If everyone did what she is teaching, the world would be boring. Why not work on yourself and find a man who supports you on your own terms as well?
What i think is ironic is that even though she claims to live off of a rich man, she makes her money off of other women and their financial insecurities. Her husband is also quite average...upper middle class at best.
I agree 😉
You’re on point
Thanks Rebecca!
The fact that she have never talked about love ,affection in her relationship but transactions... Shows she is a gold digger
It takes some enlightenment to recognize that relationships work terrifically well when arrangements are clear - even relationships without requiring love or affection.
in other videos she does talk about love and affection. you must have missed them
@@ah5721 what did you think I'd missed? Arrangements aren't devoid of love and affection. In fact, having love and the appropriate arrangements are ideal, but not necessary for both to be participated
@@openrelationships as long as people in the arangments are okay w/ their relationships whichever avenue they may be whether its just a business transaction type like escorts ,sugar babies etc that between both consenting adults. However, one of the goal Anna teaches is that its not okay to use people just for their money but the goal should be also for long term relationships that also include mutual affection and long term relationships such as marriage in the long run. Having the nice things us is what draws people in. Stick around with Anna and you learn how to maintain your image& be a better version of yourself after you filter what she says and apply what you find is helpful to your situation. I take somethings she says with a grain of salt because I'm not a traditionalist like her.
@@ah5721 I have been watching her videos for a while. And I never ever saw her saying about pure love. It's all about money and exchanges. In one video she literally says " women should make her man buy expensive things as much as possible like hand Bags and expensive rings before break up" so they can take it with them after break up!! . A secured act you see. And in that video one girl commented " Hand bags should be kept in mint condition so it will stay fresh till break up!! " This is being meterialestic at its peak. This woman is highly m@nupilative and dangerous. I feel sorry for the guy who married this woman.
She’s attracted to high achievers financially, highly motivated individuals. Who cares let her be. Unfortunately in this world there is no such thing is equality between man and woman. Empowering woman doesn’t mean telling her to get a job and pay equally it’s about giving woman the opportunities so that we can be equal to a man
I had to read that twice to make sense of the irony you provided! On one hand you insist there's no such thing as equality between the sexes and on the other hand you insist empowerment is pursuing equality between the sexes ;)
Aside from that, I certainly advocate for *people's* pursuing whom they want in whatever arrangement they would like so long as the arrangements are clear on all parties.
This includes arrangements where the woman relies on the man for provision. In fact, I encourage any woman who'd like that arrangement to see what Anna provides since she teaches some very useful stuff!
My only contention in the video was her evolutionary reasoning for women's dependence on men.
@@openrelationships I mean to say that woman are still hugely disadvantaged in this day and age For example it is still not considered the norm for a woman to date a man ten years older then her. Society tends to criticise and frown upon this where as a man can date much younger. Men are still expected to be the ones to choose when they wish to propose and society still finds it hard to accept that a woman can propose. These freedoms and expectations have been taken Away from woman because of society’s expectations. How can we change this? Why is a woman still underpaid why do they have less superannuation on average then a man. If society is going to treat woman like unequals then let men take more responsibility for woman. We still have a long way to go. Gender equality has a lot to do with reproduction and unfortunately a woman only has a window where she can achieve this in most cases. Men however can usually reproduce much later on in life. The inherent value the society places on a woman then limits them. This is systematic inequality and it can be attributed to reproduction. So yes I am in favour of men stepping up and providing woman with “more” because society is so unjust towards woman.
@@jenny86516 In my book, Relationshps 101, I go over precisely the notion that women have been dealt a hard hand wherein society really inhibits her to be an independent person.
So you see, I'm a huge advocate for women's emancipation!
Yet, to your notion that women must be paid for, and cared for, in exchange of because of the unsubstantiated idea that women are unfairly paid in the marketplace, is a very poor position. It's unsubstantiated. Women, on an aggregate, are paid less as an average on a yearly basis not because of unfairness but rather because unlike men, the majority of women step out of the workforce and opt to have children and child-rear. As a for example, there are VERY FEW men that can co-star with Scarlett Johannsen and get paid anywhere near the millions she's paid. It's not due to unfairness AGAINST the male. It's her market-value in her profession.
And like I said, if she were to CHOOSE to childrear or be a home-maker (or even for no other reason than the man in particular likes providing) and make this AGREEMENT within their partnership, ABSOLUTELY the counterpart who agrees to provide shall provide for the counterpart who takes on the childrearing responsibilities (and that's whether it's the male or female!).
@@openrelationships there are so many other factors. You are sticking to purely financial facts but there are so many ways society and government can bring woman forward. Don’t forget that the woman’s suffer age movement only started in the mid 1800s, the right to vote was only achieved in the 1900s. Your also only factoring western countries where woman are treated with more equality. There are many countries that that woman have almost no rights - Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen (these are all Islamic countries and have cultural reasons why their societies are constructed that way) there is still a long way to go and we havnt made a dent in what needs to be achieved. Until such time men can do more to support this inequality financially and emotionally. I am in no way saying a woman should sit on her arse and have a guy provide her with everything I’m saying a man should compensate a female because a man is far more privledged .
@@jenny86516 I addressed it in financial terms because you addressed it in financial terms. I'm right there with you in terms of women's (and men's) being treated unfairly in different contexts. This is why I wrote the book.
What I'm saying is based on the context, the people involved must recognize things that are unfair and negotiate terms to make it fair. This is opposed to just blindly and outright giving you more money because you think these things exists entirely outside of the context of your immediate relationship.
So what I WOULD encourage women to do is learn negotiation skills and recognize your worth and enter into every agreement as a negotiation. If you don't feel the agreements are fair, opt out of that dynamic or make very specific and clear delineations.
It’s not about that I like how she teaches women about class abd elegance . Women nowadays are classless. Showing too much skin on instragram and long nails . I don’t need to catch a rich man but I watch her video to learn how to to be effortless elegant . I don’t need to wear leggings as pants to be attractive
Hey Bella. I do agree with you in terms of the skills and etiquette she teaches is great! And I pointed that out in the video. My contention was about evolutionary psychology reasoning.
you are honest persons ... I love her.. but I like to know other opinions .. and no one was honest like you... being honest will be your biggest bless I will subscribe to you channel supporting you
Thank you Aya. I appreciate that!
Literally this :)
I also noticed no matter how much changed we have rules of normal. Culture of what and what not to do.or the consequences, reputation. Gossiping. Etc
My grandfathers and father agree with Anna Bey… And you missed the points she was making entirely lol… Literally the type of man she says we need to avoid which is another basic dude, trying to get a video to go viral by being crazy and using somebody else. 😂 I’m a female engineer who graduated from Berkeley, I have no hangups in my own life education-wise, emotionally or mentally. The less men do and feel compelled to do as men, the less they ARE men by the day… It’s a fact and I can see a lot of that in you as you sit. Evolutionary psychology alone has proven this but there is physical evidence to show that men by the way they live and work has played a huge role in this. 🤣 There is a reason men in cities are effected by all of this worse than those who are further away from cities eating better and living more-so how they always have… Which is caretakers.
I love all these relationship experts who all got their start on RUclips.
You're a female engineer Edith so I'd love to hear you provide some logical arguments since you haven't provided any.
Wow, you have lips that look just like Anna Bey. I have watched a lot of Anna's videos, and I've never heard her say that women should "rely on a man". She feels that women should be independent and be self-reliant. What she believes is that a man should talk care of their wife because of a lot of reasons. I think you got her all wrong.
🤣 Thanks Kendall. Yes, I don't believe Anna says women should rely on men. What I argued was that she said women evolved to rely on men.
@@openrelationships Rone, no they don't evolve to rely on man, you've got it all wrong. Anna and many married women who are influencers say this and I've heard it a lot. They believe that women when married to men shouldn't have to go 50/50 on anything, they believe what once married, a man should be the sole breadwinners of the home and should be responsible for the financial aspect of the home, the wife, and kids. That was a compliment on your lips by the way. Nice and full, very sexy. I don't think it is fair however because not all men can foot the entire bill and they really need that financial help of the women. But ultimately it's up to the women. If she must pay, he is no longer the head and that position is shared 50/50. He has to understand that.
@@kendal4452 thank you for the compliment! 🤗 You've essentially argued my point ;)
i think you need to watch all her videos for more understanding. 😊
Watching all her videos doesn't change what she says in one video presuming she's consistent. Does she contradict herself in her other videos that would invalidate my argument?
you seem to have made a judgement of her whole youtube content out of that few videos you watched. anyway keep doing what youre doing you seem to be enjoying it anyway. 😊
@@malureemalubay I've made an argument about her evolutionary theory of women's dependence on men for survival. Did you have a reasonable argument for Anna?
I honestly think you misunderstood Anna Bey
On which part?
I love your comments.
They're so much fun 😁 Thanks!
i think women still bring children as a choice, we have also the opportunities to have a job, college degree etc,but not every woman want that. we are forced to live a modern life because we were judge in the past and we still are. women in the old days didn´t fight so all women got a college degree and got a 9 to5 job. they changed the laws and society mind so those who want that kind of life could have it. in our society there are still women who love gardening, cooking, making bread and take care of our children, that like to be around their home and enjoy their caretaker role in a family, but few men are still jerks who want a woman so they basically take care of their home, and be there every morning for sex. and still they don´t really want to take care of them, a lot of men want their woman to cook, clean take care of their children and work as well... that is a fact
That's true, so what we teach in relationships management is the idea that all arrangements mustn't be presumed and expectations must be managed. All individuals in relationships must negotiate what they'd like instead of assume the roles in that relationship without knowing what those roles entail.
@@openrelationships it doesn´t matter if you say with honesty what you want, some men would still take advantage,i dated a guy for 6 years! i always said what i wanted + i work too and he still would not provide for absolutely anything,or intentions to commit calling me materialistic for the life i want.totally wrong the way some men take this empowerment and this women rights thing. watching anna bey had made me realize there´s nothing wrong with being a WOMAN and be proud of where you want to get as a wife, mother or profesionist.
@@huntingfashiondolls3307 anytime you enter into a negotiation, you have to consider whether the other person is reliable. Anyone, regardless of their gender, can say they'd provide something within the agreement and not provide it. This is the point you recognize, this person isn't worthwhile of your time, attention and trust, and you give them the most important choice of all: to take it or leave it. Either they do as they'd promise or you'll recognize your time can be better spent elsewhere.
Before these women sign away their life savings to Yacht girl/ sugar baby They need to know they are being scammed.
I don't believe they're being scammed by Anna Bey at all. To be a sugar baby and to engage with a high net worth individual in a relationship, which is what I believe she teaches, is not much different.
Hello, my dear elegant ladies. LOL.
Haha! I like it it's catchy!
Do your thing also.You have no right to say anything to somebody. If its her way that is what she is.
Anyone has all the right to criticize someone, just like you're doing now.
stfu
In her other videos she also teaches women that its okay to be smart get an education and be successful when you are with a successful man so if the man leaves you or passes aren't left without a means to provide for yourself. I don't always agree with everything she says though as it doesn't work for every couple but she validates women who are happy to stay at home and child rear and want to depend on a man. however there are many women who don't want to rely on men though and they face generational poverty and its a proven fact that a western modern culture of two committed loving parents who are married have children who do better in school, are able to get better paying jobs etc. Sociologists have studied this for decades .
I don't disagree with you at all Amanda :) I agree. I like to validate women who want various arrangements whether or not it's reliant on anyone else. My concern was she propagated that women evolved to rely on men. I appreciate your thoughtful comment!
@@openrelationships I also don't agree with how she delivered her message on women need men. As I have been married for almost 9 year I can say I do need my husband to keep working to provide our basic needs and help me with child rearing. However I don't need him to feel fulfilled or feel complete and I'm not naturally a "giver ". I feel like that's an overgeneralization and many women don't feel like this. I take this one with a grain of salt. Women are dependent on men because of societal norms not because of evolution.
@@ah5721 Precisely Amanda! Very wise of you to make that delineation. A partnership in which the agreement involves there is a financial provider and a primary child-rearer is a great one that works terrifically well for everyone involved.
Faint heart never won fair lady.
I see you're fine but she is very funny and I have a lot of fun learning from her I'm 64 and I think she's great she's funny I noticed that man are trying to do the same thing she's doing two women appreciation and everything and they are just imitating her. Besides a person besides what to pay attention to. I like her very much and I I'm not trying to capture a man but it's funny how she handles the man topics.
Women aren’t emancipated????? What century are we living??? Gee golly!!!
Honestly i have seen her videos and its nice to see and watch but no matter what not all men are the same specially rich guys who has it all .. we dont know whats in their mind but since they have the machineries and all the $$$ they can judge your motives and even how hard to get you are .. if he is for you there will be no more stuggles ..
That gold digger entitled🤢🤢
To play a fair game.... Both sexes shud do house chores & work & look after family
It'd depend on the agreements in the relationship Auxilia. It's also fair to delegate and offload specific tasks to certain persons based on their specialties, dynamic and things they're good at.
Great points
Thank you Rina!
You really have a point. Our original, ancient roles in society still affect us, but we've also changed. Things are not as they were before and men and women are currently living with the highest level of equality that's ever existed throughout history. Obviously it's not perfect, but when there's ever been something perfect and not improvable?
Precisely Beatriz! Thanks for sharing your insight!
I watched your video with interest :) I have to take issues with some of what you said, though...
Yes, AB does imply even state that evolutionary factors determine gender role norms but you were right earlier when you said that society dictates these, not biology in some cases. There are tribes whereby the man virtually does nothing -not even making the money -whilst the women do everything. But that is not the problem with her brand...
Anna's course is largely about teaching women how to have their cake and eat it to. She teaches nothing about reciprocity in a relationship, only how to leech by usin manipulative tactics and how to position themselves to find a rich man. Something she has failed to do herself as her persona and profile are manufactured, a lot of her material unoriginal and uncited of its original source material and she is selling an illusion - one that has no bearing on her qualification to teach what she claims to be expert in.
She is bad for womanhood for those reasons - teaching them that cheating, leaching, manipulating and being fake is OK - for her viewers/customers and for herself too - not because she is teaching something evolutionarily irrelevant for this modern day and age.
That's an interesting take BG. I don't know enough about her material to make an insightful comment but you might know more into that. I was just pointing out one of her points. If what you say is true, I'm with you!
Anna Bey teaches far more than how to find an affluent man. She teaches femininity, proper etiquette, overall self improvement, and strongly encourages higher education, as well as so much more. When she talks about evolutionary psychology, she's referring to how men are naturally wired to be the hunter. For example; when finding a mate, men like the "chase", so to speak. I've Never seen an example of a woman truly feeling treasured, and adored if She were the one who pursued the man. All of us, male or female, value what we've had to work for far more than if it were just handed to us. However, when it comes to finding a mate, the "masculine male" wants to do the chasing, plain and simple. Think of your own friends. What do you see when it was the woman who did the persuing? Generally, the man will take her for granted in time because he wasn't able to follow his "natural instincts" as the hunter. This applies to relationships that are affluent as well as ones that aren't. I think a man who protects and provides for his female mate undoubtedly feels more masculine, as well as a deep sense of pride. Anna is not saying to women just find a rich man and you're good to go. No, she teaches how to be a high caliber woman with good character yourself so you'll attract a high caliber man who also has good character. She feels strongly about being respectful to everyone, and to be well mannered and kind. But I think we can all agree that if a woman indeed wants a man who Is able to provide for her he will have an easier time doing so if he is affluent, or at least motivated to do what's necessary to provide for his wife and family.
You said your comments are based one of her videos you watched, but I encourage you to watch all of her videos so that you can get a better idea of her offerings as a whole.
Anna doesnt promote women relying on men, sorry we not interested in what you saying.
Who's we?
@@openrelationships find out
@@chiccoponela3688 by 'we' I presume you're referring to yourself and perhaps your alterego?
@@openrelationships she's a gold digger bro. She supports anna because she wants an easy life with a man to bring food to her table without letting her face any responsibilities and duties of a human being.
It is wrong to use another's platform to make your own video by criticizing that person.
I'm using my platform within RUclips platform. Criticism about others especially if it's specifically to enlighten others by sharing my contradicting view is merited, because it's within the area of the knowledge I provide. But nonetheless, I did spend some time in the video encouraging others to check out Anna's work. As they say, there is no bad press.
Thanks to her, i' m in a relationship with an affluent man. ☺
Good on you Andrus!
Hi Anna bey teaches truth about how a woman can marry a good strong rich man she's not saying for woman to be stupid. The man must be the man to provide fully for woman can be educated and have a career not be with a slug guy
Yes women can do that!
I have listened to many of Anna‘s videos and you have in my opinion/observation misconstrued her. I find your criticisms unnecessary and unfair to a fellow you tuber.💔
In what way did I misonstrue her in an unnecessary and unfair way?
Brother please go and watch all the videos of Anna's and come to talk..
Why do you feel there's a need for that anju?
But seriously why do you feel the need to critique Ms. Anna Bey? You are not her demographic.