Sorry about the spam on the videos lately, we remove them when we see them. please report any you see. Also let us know which board you are using right now for your AMD or Intel powered system
@@classicrock71 I have it in my build with 32GB 6000 CL30. Have had it since December and haven't experienced any issues. Paired with 7800x3d and rx7900xtx. Made sure to flash the bios. I play games and do some light office work from home so I figured I don't need all the bells and whistles of a more high-end board.
Choose the Carbon. 4 M.2 -2 Gen5 2 Gen4. No desire to install a gen5 drive but it should get everything out of a gen4 drive (2 SK Hynix P41 2tb). The Carbon was one of the few boards that populating all the M.2 slots did not steal bandwidth from the PCIe slots
There is something here that don't add up. Any AMD 7000 series CPU have 24 PCIe gen5 lanes. If 16 of this is used for a GPU and 4 of them is used for thunderbolt or USB4 support or what not, how can it possibly run 2x M.2 gen5 x4? That sums up to 28 lanes+ the 4 lanes going to the chipset. With 2 gen5 M.2, it must cut the bandwith in half for the PCIe slot or for the M.2's. If it cuts the bandwith for the M.2's to gen5 x2, then a gen4 drive would have around gen3 speed.
@@Audiosan79 check the manual or the specs page. 2 gen5x4 M.2, 2 gen4x4 m.2 M.2_1 Source (From CPU) supports up to PCIe 5.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices M.2_2 Source (From CPU) supports up to PCIe 5.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices M.2_3 Source (From Chipset) supports up to PCIe 4.0 x4 , supports 22110/2280/2260 devices M.2_4 Source (From Chipset) supports up to PCIe 4.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices 6x SATA 6G 2x USB 2.0 (Rear) 4x USB 2.0 (Front) 4x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type A (Front) 6x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type A (Rear) 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type C (Rear) 1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type C (Front) 1x USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Type C (Rear)
X670E? How is the stability, BIOS updates, and the RGB software. I hate my current ASUS Z370 due to the Armoury Crate software, thinking of a TUF gaming (no RGB) or just going to MSI, Asrock or Giga. I do like the ASUS Bios though as I am familiar with it.
@iain8837 msi rgb sucks. Not enough options like the Asus or Gigabyte models. I use msi mostly because it is more reliable and stable than any other motherboard brands. Never had a problem with the bios
I got the Tomahawk 650B in January, very pleased indeed, well made and the Bios is very clear to use, I run a 7600 in it for gaming and general internet use, recommended.
@@classicrock71 32GB of Vengeance DDR5 5600 MHz, from all the reviews the price difference at the time to go to anything faster was not worth it. with 32GB programs are not swapped out during operation like they used too so transfer speeds are not so critical, if your doing serious number crunching maybe but not with a 7600 CPU., its in a blink fast so thats good enough.
I went with the MSI x670e Gaming plus. Not the prettiest board, but had everything I needed and nothing I didn't. Tomahawk didn't have enough USB ports, I play flight sims and have a ton of peripherals.
Bought the 7700x and x670e-m Gene board on release. I was planning on updating to the X3D when it came out but didn’t bother. Waiting for the 9000 series X3D chips.
There is 1 minor issue of X670E Carbon: At the end of the Primary M.2 slot (near the AM5 socket), there is a knob protruding upward which will cause some NVME getting stuck when you want to take them out. You have to wiggle and pull up intensively in order to take the NVME out.
The Carbon is my favourite considering the price point - really good motherboard. I had to move to MSI lately, Gigabyte dont always update BIOSES and I had a lot of bug issues.
Nice review! The 2 670e boards really only makes sense functionally if you need to run 2 GPUs and have a high-speed PCI express slot in reserve for future expansion like video capture cards. Both of these lack thunderbolt functionality (no built-in, no headers). Comparably priced gigabyte and asus models offer this.
I got a Tomahawk I'm running with a 4080 super, when the 9800x3d comes out I'm going to upgrade to that but I'm perfectly happy with 7600 ram :D. After seeing this I'm glad I decided on that motherboard. In two or three years when gaming at 4k 144hz is terrible and I decide I need more power or whatever, I'm not going to regret retiring a $180 motherboard if the newer graphics cards require it. But having just got the 4080 super, I think it will not be until a 6080 or 6090 that I upgrade again.
It's going to be interesting when the 'updated' x670 (x870) motherboards start to appear (in time for Zen5 release). While Zen5 will function aok in most/all current AM5 MB's, what new functionality will be incorporated to justify the x870 R&D? Anyone who has bought the expensive MSI MEG x670e ACE, for example, will probably be a bit p#d off if significant new features are added to the x870 equivalent.
So an advert... where is the testing, ie see how far the ram can go on the boards, and where is opinion if the bios is easy to navigate or not, and if the bios is buggy or not and so on... mobo tests are so lackluster these days.
Its a 'showcase' of three MSI boards - if it was a review we would label them reviews - they wanted us to show these boards to viewers. We also do reviews of products and they are all clearly labeled before you click links. It says you have been subscribed to us for 6 years, thank you for the support over the years.
I LOVE the looks and features of the MSI X670E ACE, but I am waiting for the new AMD chipset and CPUs to arrive, hopefully in the next 4 months. I already have the case, Jonsbo TK-2, cooler, Artic Liquid Freezer III 360 ARGB, ARGB reverse flow fans, memory Corsair 96GB DDR5 6600, M.2's Crucial T705 4GB and HP FX900 Pro 4TB, power supply Corsair AX1500i. What I want is a new Project Zero board with the new chipset and 10G Ethernet, 5.0 PCIe and M.2, and USB4. I have other bits and bobs I'm using, like the MSI RTX4090 Gaming X Trio GPU, but can't wait until the new CPU/Motherboards release to build it.
I personally feel that both MEG ACE and GODLIKE motherboards are going towards those liquid nitrogen overclockers... MPG Carbon is the best for normal usage as a high-end gaming PC.
They were all pleasingly rapid. There was a delay of 10-15 seconds after EXPO was enabled but that was all, so much better than we have previously experienced. Leo
Cost shouldn’t matter in terms of…well I have a 4090 and 7950x3D. What should factor in is your use case. You can have cheaper parts and use an ace and vice versa with the tomahawk
Any reason for the B650 to be running the CPU that much hotter at a lower frequency? Looking at the hwinfo, it was only at 60%ish of it's power limits, whereas the others were up in the 80-90s. Possible a bad cooler mount?
All three CPUs were running at 95 C which is the way of Zen 4 however it seems particularly unecessary with the lower power draw and slightly lower clock speed on the B650. Leo
Personally love the darkened approach of the Tomahawk. Shame MSI decided to save 2p and not include heatsink for all NVMEs. That would trigger my OCD more than anything. That would be a pass from me.
The issue with the M.2 expander on the high end board is that people spending that money are likely to have a 3+ slot GPU that renders the 2nd PCIe slot unusable with the current comedy GPU sizing. Unless you could house it in the 3rd PCIe, which looks very tight given the amount of connections that will be plugged in at the bottom there, then it becomes unusable for many.
The expander card in the 3rd (gen5 x4) slot would restrict you to only one SSD (each M.2 SSD uses 4 physical lanes). That bottom gen5 x4 slot, however, is equivalent in speed to a gen4 x8 slot or a gen3 x16. Currently, no GPU maxes this out, so providing it fits in the case etc, you could put your GPU in the 3rd slot and free up 16 gen5 lanes spread across the 1st 2 slots (16/0 or 8/8) e.g. two expander cards to add 4 more gen5 SSD's.
@@ChrisM541 I can't imagine any GPU today fitting in the bottom slot without being low profile, but the second yes that could be doable and the first slot could then hold the expander as you say.
A Leo video, yes! A great overview. Very clear and well-presented. Given that you were looking at a £700+ motherboard, I’m disappointed that you didn’t compare it to a Threadripper motherboard. Or don’t MSI make one? I would also like to see you pay more attention to internal expansion . For instance, could you place a 10 Gb Ethernet or a capture card - or both - alongside a large GPU (e.g. a 4090) on those boards? Will the M.2 drives get hot underneath a big GPU? I actually chose an Asus X670E motherboard because I could run a big GPU like my 4090 and also a 10 Gb Ethernet card. (It actually hosts my A770 right now.)
Threadripper has become so niche and expensive that it merits proper standalone reviews of specific motherboards. I must confess the WS WRX80 looks intriguing www.msi.com/Motherboard/WS-WRX80 Leo
@@KitGuruTechThe WRX80 is TR4, isn't it? TRX50 motherboards start at £700 - very competitive with high end Ryzen - but the 7960 is £1270 - not so competitive. Keep up the good work.
Ok they support the same CPU, but what I want to know is can I use Gen 4 Nvme SSD in all their slots, and I do want one that will support using 4 of these Nvme SSD without comprising the GPU slot down from 16 to 8, I want to keep it at 16, and at the moment the CPU I have my mind set on is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, at his moment I want to use this CPU because I been told by more than one person it is the best gaming CPU out at the moment. I also want to possibility upgrade to the New Ryzens that are due out this year. So which motherboard would be the best to get for this?
Informative video. Very descriptive. I'm running an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on a ASUS TUF Gaming B550M-PLUS WiFi motherboard. It's been rock solid since I built it in August 2020.
With these new releases, do you think mobo makers/AMD will still release a new chipset series for the next gen of AM5 chips? Not gonna lie, that top-end model is pretty swish!
Interesting! what is the relation between VRM and cooling? I mean, It's totally understandable that better VRM means more & better juice to the CPU which can push further, still this should also be directly correleted in lower temp. If the CPU is consuming less power (less joule effect) and the CPU cooler is the same, why they are all reaching 95°C thermal cap? 😕
AMD Zen 4 pushes the CPU to use the available resources in a triangle of power-heat-performance. In essence if you improve cooling you won't see a temperature drop but will see a slight boost in performance. Leo
@@KitGuruTech I'm just stonked that same cooler and 157W caps out at 95°C like 207W (Carbon) and 210 W (ACE). So ~25% Less power to dissipate with 157W and the same cooler but zero less temperature.... Sounds weird. Thank you Leo for your prompt interaction!
I have a problem with a tomahawk series motherboard where realtek audio does not work even though the audio jack is inserted and detected, only a hum is heard, and a clumsy solder joint at the bottom sata port so it feels like it's going to break, and I have tried to RMA and it was rejected,
Very debatable, boils down to if you believe PCIe5 will be relevant in the next 5 years. A 4090 is only "just" maxing out PCIe 3.0 now but you can absolutely get away with it. PCI 4.0 will be fine for at least the next two GPU generations, by which time you may want to move to the next new Intel or AMD socket anyway. The extra money spent on a X670 over B650 perhaps better used elsewhere.
All ATX(+) motherboards like it's still 1998 🙄 Back then you had Soundlblaster soundcard for sound and joystick connector, 1 (or 2) Network card, TV Tuner card just for fun, Video capture card to connect your video camera, all the different stuff. Nowadays though? Lonely GPU on an oversized MB. ROG Strix B660-I gaming WiFi. The next one will be AM5 though. Except Intel steps up the game with efficiency and full gaming performance at i5 level.
Same. I hear bad things, but I have never had an issue with any Gigabyte products or Asrock for that matter. Never owned an MSI product. Ive actually had the most issues with Asus products.
You do realise this is in the title? its a look at three MSI motherboards? How can you miss the title of the video and then take time to write that out?
@@LifeIsButaBluff Its a showcase video, we toggled on the paid for content button at start to show this. Its not a review - its a showcase highlighting features, I/O, board layout, ports, product support and overall what you get for your money. It is not a review of each board and there is no indepth testing - correct. If we get time we will review some more motherboards - but each board takes weeks to analyse to the level we would be happy publishing as a full on 'review' video. While not a full review, we do show features in this video for the three boards, differentiating features, between three price points. Some people have found it useful based on comments, but if you want an indepth analysis of MSI, Gigabyte, ASUS and ASROCK boards - then yes, this video is not for you.
Sorry about the spam on the videos lately, we remove them when we see them. please report any you see. Also let us know which board you are using right now for your AMD or Intel powered system
It’s everywhere sadly 😢
7950X and the MSI carbon...love it!
I have the MSI mag B650 Tomahawk for my 7800X3D and i love it... Cheap, stable and a very nice look.
What memory did you get with this combo. Im reviewing for a board now. DO you like your choice with the Tomahawk?
@@classicrock71 very! No regret after all. I am using the G.Skill Tridend z5 6000mhz CL30.
@@classicrock71 I have it in my build with 32GB 6000 CL30. Have had it since December and haven't experienced any issues. Paired with 7800x3d and rx7900xtx. Made sure to flash the bios. I play games and do some light office work from home so I figured I don't need all the bells and whistles of a more high-end board.
How are the boot up times?
Thanks KG, three great looking motherboards - nice to see more of these on show, havent seen you guys doing many lately!
Our pleasure!
Will you
Do Amd gigabyte boards too or Asrock ?
Choose the Carbon. 4 M.2 -2 Gen5 2 Gen4. No desire to install a gen5 drive but it should get everything out of a gen4 drive (2 SK Hynix P41 2tb). The Carbon was one of the few boards that populating all the M.2 slots did not steal bandwidth from the PCIe slots
You have it. ? What kind of performance results are you getting with it ?
There is something here that don't add up. Any AMD 7000 series CPU have 24 PCIe gen5 lanes. If 16 of this is used for a GPU and 4 of them is used for thunderbolt or USB4 support or what not, how can it possibly run 2x M.2 gen5 x4? That sums up to 28 lanes+ the 4 lanes going to the chipset. With 2 gen5 M.2, it must cut the bandwith in half for the PCIe slot or for the M.2's. If it cuts the bandwith for the M.2's to gen5 x2, then a gen4 drive would have around gen3 speed.
@@Audiosan79 check the manual or the specs page. 2 gen5x4 M.2, 2 gen4x4 m.2
M.2_1 Source (From CPU) supports up to PCIe 5.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices
M.2_2 Source (From CPU) supports up to PCIe 5.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices
M.2_3 Source (From Chipset) supports up to PCIe 4.0 x4 , supports 22110/2280/2260 devices
M.2_4 Source (From Chipset) supports up to PCIe 4.0 x4 , supports 2280/2260 devices
6x SATA 6G
2x USB 2.0 (Rear)
4x USB 2.0 (Front)
4x USB 3.2 Gen1 Type A (Front)
6x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type A (Rear)
1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type C (Rear)
1x USB 3.2 Gen2 Type C (Front)
1x USB 3.2 Gen2x2 Type C (Rear)
I did get it confirmed, that the MSI X670E carbon indeed run the M.2 gen 5 in x2 mode when both M.2-1 and M.2-2 is populated.
@@Audiosan79 it may help if you are using any future CPUs with higher PCIe lanes. right now I dont see it fit, also the gen5 is expensive...
I bought the MPG carbon to use with my 7800x3d. Works great. Didn't think I needed the ACE. Kind of an overkill
X670E? How is the stability, BIOS updates, and the RGB software. I hate my current ASUS Z370 due to the Armoury Crate software, thinking of a TUF gaming (no RGB) or just going to MSI, Asrock or Giga. I do like the ASUS Bios though as I am familiar with it.
@iain8837 msi rgb sucks. Not enough options like the Asus or Gigabyte models. I use msi mostly because it is more reliable and stable than any other motherboard brands. Never had a problem with the bios
That ACE board is amazing - ive an older model, best board on the market.
Lovely camera work. Great focus on the boards !!❤
Thank you! Cheers!
been eyeing the ace primarily for the 10g nic, they arent overly cheap to add to one of the cheaper boards
I got the Tomahawk 650B in January, very pleased indeed, well made and the Bios is very clear to use, I run a 7600 in it for gaming and general internet use, recommended.
Good to hear some feedback about these from people using them
What memory did you choose?
@@classicrock71 32GB of Vengeance DDR5 5600 MHz, from all the reviews the price difference at the time to go to anything faster was not worth it. with 32GB programs are not swapped out during operation like they used too so transfer speeds are not so critical, if your doing serious number crunching maybe but not with a 7600 CPU., its in a blink fast so thats good enough.
Great article. Love the board overview bit and close ups on layout and io panels. Really useful if I’m in market for a new board.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I went with the MSI x670e Gaming plus. Not the prettiest board, but had everything I needed and nothing I didn't. Tomahawk didn't have enough USB ports, I play flight sims and have a ton of peripherals.
Bought the 7700x and x670e-m Gene board on release. I was planning on updating to the X3D when it came out but didn’t bother. Waiting for the 9000 series X3D chips.
Thanks Leo enjoyed this coverage of latest MSI amd boards. Really good.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I have a b550 gaming edge wifi. I find that most MSI boards are good, but there is always the chance of a stinker, such as the X570 Tomahawk
There is 1 minor issue of X670E Carbon:
At the end of the Primary M.2 slot (near the AM5 socket), there is a knob protruding upward which will cause some NVME getting stuck when you want to take them out. You have to wiggle and pull up intensively in order to take the NVME out.
The Carbon is my favourite considering the price point - really good motherboard. I had to move to MSI lately, Gigabyte dont always update BIOSES and I had a lot of bug issues.
Thank you very much, helped me settle on the Carbon! Very good review format.
Glad it helped!
Nice review!
The 2 670e boards really only makes sense functionally if you need to run 2 GPUs and have a high-speed PCI express slot in reserve for future expansion like video capture cards.
Both of these lack thunderbolt functionality (no built-in, no headers). Comparably priced gigabyte and asus models offer this.
Great video Leo helps me settle my next motherboard. Just shame its only comes in black
I got a Tomahawk I'm running with a 4080 super, when the 9800x3d comes out I'm going to upgrade to that but I'm perfectly happy with 7600 ram :D. After seeing this I'm glad I decided on that motherboard. In two or three years when gaming at 4k 144hz is terrible and I decide I need more power or whatever, I'm not going to regret retiring a $180 motherboard if the newer graphics cards require it. But having just got the 4080 super, I think it will not be until a 6080 or 6090 that I upgrade again.
Good choice!
14:03 -- "scored in line" on Speedway means within 0.3% but below. Tiny bit surprising but within sampling error, it may be supposed.
Like that all black design looks very snazzy would contrast nicely with a white case.
It's going to be interesting when the 'updated' x670 (x870) motherboards start to appear (in time for Zen5 release). While Zen5 will function aok in most/all current AM5 MB's, what new functionality will be incorporated to justify the x870 R&D? Anyone who has bought the expensive MSI MEG x670e ACE, for example, will probably be a bit p#d off if significant new features are added to the x870 equivalent.
So an advert... where is the testing, ie see how far the ram can go on the boards, and where is opinion if the bios is easy to navigate or not, and if the bios is buggy or not and so on... mobo tests are so lackluster these days.
Its a 'showcase' of three MSI boards - if it was a review we would label them reviews - they wanted us to show these boards to viewers. We also do reviews of products and they are all clearly labeled before you click links. It says you have been subscribed to us for 6 years, thank you for the support over the years.
I LOVE the looks and features of the MSI X670E ACE, but I am waiting for the new AMD chipset and CPUs to arrive, hopefully in the next 4 months. I already have the case, Jonsbo TK-2, cooler, Artic Liquid Freezer III 360 ARGB, ARGB reverse flow fans, memory Corsair 96GB DDR5 6600, M.2's Crucial T705 4GB and HP FX900 Pro 4TB, power supply Corsair AX1500i. What I want is a new Project Zero board with the new chipset and 10G Ethernet, 5.0 PCIe and M.2, and USB4. I have other bits and bobs I'm using, like the MSI RTX4090 Gaming X Trio GPU, but can't wait until the new CPU/Motherboards release to build it.
Exciting times. You seem more patient than me mind you 😂
@@bobsmithson8592 Yeah I dont think I could have all that sitting waiting to be built!
I personally feel that both MEG ACE and GODLIKE motherboards are going towards those liquid nitrogen overclockers... MPG Carbon is the best for normal usage as a high-end gaming PC.
I'm so glad i don't have worry about that for long time after last upgrade
What did you get. I’m thinking about a new board but want reliable. So unsure as i used to buy asus all that time but here they aren’t so good now
@@Necromancerbob-zp7us
ASUS ROG Z690-F GAMING WIFI
INTEL CORE I7-12700K s1700
2x16G CORS VENG RGB DDR5 6000
ASUS RTX 4090 ROG STRIX OC
Don't forget the audio codec which is a reason to buy these boards over others.
How were the boot times? I heard this was a problem with MSI boards due to memory Training or something like that
They were all pleasingly rapid. There was a delay of 10-15 seconds after EXPO was enabled but that was all, so much better than we have previously experienced.
Leo
Cant believe the speed USB type C can transfer its crazy.
MSI Meg X670e Ace:
8:43 -- "remarkably smart" looking 👍
9:18 -- ddr5 at 8000, wow
0:57 -- yes, a "somewhat terrifying" price of £740
Cost shouldn’t matter in terms of…well I have a 4090 and 7950x3D. What should factor in is your use case. You can have cheaper parts and use an ace and vice versa with the tomahawk
Good article got a lot out of it thanks
Glad to hear it
Any reason for the B650 to be running the CPU that much hotter at a lower frequency? Looking at the hwinfo, it was only at 60%ish of it's power limits, whereas the others were up in the 80-90s. Possible a bad cooler mount?
All three CPUs were running at 95 C which is the way of Zen 4 however it seems particularly unecessary with the lower power draw and slightly lower clock speed on the B650.
Leo
Mighty meg.... Seem a lot of money for a motherboard!
Personally love the darkened approach of the Tomahawk. Shame MSI decided to save 2p and not include heatsink for all NVMEs. That would trigger my OCD more than anything. That would be a pass from me.
Don’t a lot of nvme drives come with heatsinks now anyway ? I know my western digital one has a hs
extra nvme heatsinks are really cheap or not?
The issue with the M.2 expander on the high end board is that people spending that money are likely to have a 3+ slot GPU that renders the 2nd PCIe slot unusable with the current comedy GPU sizing. Unless you could house it in the 3rd PCIe, which looks very tight given the amount of connections that will be plugged in at the bottom there, then it becomes unusable for many.
The expander card in the 3rd (gen5 x4) slot would restrict you to only one SSD (each M.2 SSD uses 4 physical lanes). That bottom gen5 x4 slot, however, is equivalent in speed to a gen4 x8 slot or a gen3 x16. Currently, no GPU maxes this out, so providing it fits in the case etc, you could put your GPU in the 3rd slot and free up 16 gen5 lanes spread across the 1st 2 slots (16/0 or 8/8) e.g. two expander cards to add 4 more gen5 SSD's.
@@ChrisM541 I can't imagine any GPU today fitting in the bottom slot without being low profile, but the second yes that could be doable and the first slot could then hold the expander as you say.
Wich of this motherboards comes native with PCI Bifurcation? To be able to add 4 more M2 drives? Or even 8?
A Leo video, yes! A great overview. Very clear and well-presented.
Given that you were looking at a £700+ motherboard, I’m disappointed that you didn’t compare it to a Threadripper motherboard. Or don’t MSI make one?
I would also like to see you pay more attention to internal expansion . For instance, could you place a 10 Gb Ethernet or a capture card - or both - alongside a large GPU (e.g. a 4090) on those boards? Will the M.2 drives get hot underneath a big GPU? I actually chose an Asus X670E motherboard because I could run a big GPU like my 4090 and also a 10 Gb Ethernet card. (It actually hosts my A770 right now.)
Threadripper has become so niche and expensive that it merits proper standalone reviews of specific motherboards. I must confess the WS WRX80 looks intriguing
www.msi.com/Motherboard/WS-WRX80
Leo
@@KitGuruTechThe WRX80 is TR4, isn't it? TRX50 motherboards start at £700 - very competitive with high end Ryzen - but the 7960 is £1270 - not so competitive.
Keep up the good work.
Ok they support the same CPU, but what I want to know is can I use Gen 4 Nvme SSD in all their slots, and I do want one that will support using 4 of these Nvme SSD without comprising the GPU slot down from 16 to 8, I want to keep it at 16, and at the moment the CPU I have my mind set on is the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, at his moment I want to use this CPU because I been told by more than one person it is the best gaming CPU out at the moment. I also want to possibility upgrade to the New Ryzens that are due out this year. So which motherboard would be the best to get for this?
Any thoughts on the MSI x670e godlike?
I have the ACE. It's a great board. I'm not 100% pleased with it however and at the money i paid (big Dollarydoo's) that's a problem.
What about the x670e Tomahawk compared to the carbon? Those are the 2 on thinking about getting
It looks like the X670E has a bigger box than the others so therefore must be a higher price tag.
Informative video. Very descriptive. I'm running an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on a ASUS TUF Gaming B550M-PLUS WiFi motherboard. It's been rock solid since I built it in August 2020.
Glad it helped!
MEG is honestly overpriced but if you have money to spend then yeah it’s the best of the best.
Tomahawk seems offer the best value
Honestly could have done without the gaming decals on the high end board.
I have the b650 Tomahawk with a 7800x3d, so am I losing performance? Is it worth upgrading to the Carbon WiFi? I also have an rtx4090.
With these new releases, do you think mobo makers/AMD will still release a new chipset series for the next gen of AM5 chips? Not gonna lie, that top-end model is pretty swish!
That ace board is unreal. Next level. 😮
Meg Ace $679 in US as of 5/2/24
Interesting! what is the relation between VRM and cooling? I mean, It's totally understandable that better VRM means more & better juice to the CPU which can push further, still this should also be directly correleted in lower temp. If the CPU is consuming less power (less joule effect) and the CPU cooler is the same, why they are all reaching 95°C thermal cap? 😕
AMD Zen 4 pushes the CPU to use the available resources in a triangle of power-heat-performance. In essence if you improve cooling you won't see a temperature drop but will see a slight boost in performance.
Leo
@@KitGuruTech I'm just stonked that same cooler and 157W caps out at 95°C like 207W (Carbon) and 210 W (ACE).
So ~25% Less power to dissipate with 157W and the same cooler but zero less temperature.... Sounds weird. Thank you Leo for your prompt interaction!
Msi x670 Auros Elite Ax vs Msi x670E carbon wifi which one is best??
I like that ace.
It’s a very Good board
How does the Carbon WiFi holds with Gen9 7050x is she stable
you guys always do the best reviews
well this isnt really a review, but thanks regardless.
AM5 really the good deal today
another good one Leo!
Glad you think so!
Thanks. That was cool review.👍
Glad you liked it!
I’d like to see gigabyte and ASUS boards too
Does msi meg ace x670e is compatible with amd 7800x3d?
I have a problem with a tomahawk series motherboard where realtek audio does not work even though the audio jack is inserted and detected, only a hum is heard, and a clumsy solder joint at the bottom sata port so it feels like it's going to break, and I have tried to RMA and it was rejected,
What country are you in ?
X670 is king if you want the most out of your 9 series cpu
Very debatable, boils down to if you believe PCIe5 will be relevant in the next 5 years. A 4090 is only "just" maxing out PCIe 3.0 now but you can absolutely get away with it. PCI 4.0 will be fine for at least the next two GPU generations, by which time you may want to move to the next new Intel or AMD socket anyway. The extra money spent on a X670 over B650 perhaps better used elsewhere.
That B650 is a pretty decent spec for the money quite good value. For an AMD board that is.
This video is weird AF, X770 is coming with Zen5. MSI is being sneaky to clear old X670 stocks?
nice
Thanks
All ATX(+) motherboards like it's still 1998 🙄
Back then you had Soundlblaster soundcard for sound and joystick connector, 1 (or 2) Network card, TV Tuner card just for fun, Video capture card to connect your video camera, all the different stuff. Nowadays though? Lonely GPU on an oversized MB.
ROG Strix B660-I gaming WiFi. The next one will be AM5 though. Except Intel steps up the game with efficiency and full gaming performance at i5 level.
Why would one choose any from MSI at all?
Great boards thats why. owned a lot of them in the past. ACE in particular is brilliant
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Motherboard pricing is rediculous. It is as if the price ceiling was removed when EVGA left the market (in addition to the economy being terrible).
I tend to have the best experience with gigabyte motherboards. After that, a far second is between msi and asus.
interesting to hear - which board are you using now?
@@KitGuruTech main 2 builds have a x670 elite ax and b650 pro ax
Same. I hear bad things, but I have never had an issue with any Gigabyte products or Asrock for that matter. Never owned an MSI product. Ive actually had the most issues with Asus products.
@rickgear2579 Yeah, my local microcenter pushes asus hard, but they have the most returns on them, so go figure. Tons of prime and tuf boards.
Yeah my last two ASUS boards failed. Have an MSI ace and it’s been great. Almost went with Asrock board but I heard poor things about RMA
MSI forgot to include USB4 on their AM5 motherboards 😂
MSI on a marketing push to distract from their awful Claw, I suspect.
lol quite a stretch. They have been making motherboards for quite a long time.
Clearly no MSI, their motherboards are killing m2 ssd... and their customer support sucks
I always found their customer support good when I needed it. Maybe country specific.
@@amdforlife5591 in the US they are really rude...
Could you possibly say MSI just one more time ….other motherboards are available
You do realise this is in the title? its a look at three MSI motherboards? How can you miss the title of the video and then take time to write that out?
I thought the title was “which to buy?” Came across as an extended MSI advert more than anything else., the m/b being not the only MSI items mentioned
@@LifeIsButaBluff Its a showcase video, we toggled on the paid for content button at start to show this. Its not a review - its a showcase highlighting features, I/O, board layout, ports, product support and overall what you get for your money. It is not a review of each board and there is no indepth testing - correct.
If we get time we will review some more motherboards - but each board takes weeks to analyse to the level we would be happy publishing as a full on 'review' video.
While not a full review, we do show features in this video for the three boards, differentiating features, between three price points. Some people have found it useful based on comments, but if you want an indepth analysis of MSI, Gigabyte, ASUS and ASROCK boards - then yes, this video is not for you.
With curent bios and expo i will stay away from msi.
I wouldn't buy any of them, I hate MSi. I'd much rather buy an ASRock X670E PG Lightning.
None of them they are MSI..
Finish off with a rip-off Nvidia GPU..
My final buying decision would be Asus..
Really ? I had so many issues with my last ASUS board. Wouldn’t touch them with a barge pole.
ASUS? no chance. corrupt company