It's so nice to have an English video without the 'Yo, wud up guys! We're going to be super cool today voice!' Easy soft voice, content is great and no unnecessary drama. Call me old school, but I can actually concentrate.
That's because the video is about the lens, not about the photographer. Self-referential statements apply to the nature of cameras and tested applications, not specifically telling us that he's a pro or advertising services.
@Eagleeye Jones You mean Jarrod. He's actially a nice guy and very knowledgable, but at 64 my ears just cant run as fast as his mouth. I use Chris all the time for good honest reviews. Gordon Laing is good too.
I've been using this lens for 2 years. Initially, the weight will be an issue for some when using hand-held (which is the best way to use it IMO). But after some use, you'll get used to using it. The sport version is simply too heavy for a lot of people. The lens is great fun and brilliant for birding, both for photography and actually using to identify birds. It's also a great lens for composition in dare I say, 'street photography' and creating these 'compressed' images. Great review Chris.
8:18 I would have never thought of putting vents in a lens hood but it completely makes sense. Without it it's just a big parachute to catch all the wind and shake you camera around
I bought mine last September new. I certainly do not regret my purchase. I use it regularly on my Nikon D7200 and I believe it be a very good and sharp lens. I use it primarily for bird photography.
Hi I have a D7200 too, and I am debating between this one and the Nikkor 200-500mm... is your lens still performing well? Are you still happy with your purchase ?
@@andrecruz4484 Yes, I am. I still have it and still works well. I still don't regret the purchase. That being said, if I had a choice between the Sigma or the Nikkor, I would pick the Nikkor. This, in my opinion, does not mean that the Sigma isn't good. I just think the Nikkor is just an edge better in image quality. The Tamron G2 version is also good too. I don't think you will be disappointed in any of these choices.
I have been using this lens for the past 2 years at super bike events and have had brilliant results. Handheld at 600 on fast moving subjects and have the results I was looking for from behind the spectator fences
Thanks for what I believe to be the best review of this lens on RUclips. I purchased one and have struggled to get nice, consistently sharp images, married to a Nikon D7200, even on a mono-pod. I have the usb dock so will now use your recommended OS settings for C1, along with stopping down to f8. Thanks for all your time on this, look forward to improved results.
My hubby surprised me with this lens today, it was at the very top of my want-to-buy list! I am a wedding photographer by trade but I want to do a lot more nature photography and I also shoot our big airshow every year, so I am beyond excited to have this baby in my collection! Thanks for the great video, I really appreciate it!
Love your videos. Very informative. I also watched your "Letters" series and was very pleased. You are a true blessing not only to photographers, but to the world in general.
I got this lens one month ago (without the dock), for me it's the best ratio price / sharpness / weight for the 600mm range, built quality feel great, focusing is good, sometime difficult but my 6D play a role in that too. I managed to shoot a wild roe, hand-held at 516mm and at 1/160s, the result was surprisingly sharp, I can't wait to shoot more and more with it, the 600mm range opens up a lot of possibilities!
Thank you for such a great review! I just purchased this lens and have yet to use it in the field. This review is the best on the web. You do us a wonderful service!
I've had several people tell me how soft this lens is at 600mm, I've had mine for about 5 years now and have used it on my old Canon 7D, my little M5, my R and now my R3, I have always been very happy with the results.
I've seen a lot of reviews of this lens and honestly, this one was the most comprehensive, all encompassing, clearly explained review (and on a side note, the BG music was pleasant, subtle and not obnoxious in it's levels) Thanks! I'm mostly looking for lenses compatible with my Sony A6600 camera and not sure if I really would need the other reviews on your channel (to be fair, I haven't gone through the list of video reviews you have and only skimmed through it) but I'm so happy with your video, I decided to subscribe to your channel anyway :) Thanks for your time, presentation and attention to details
Great Review 👍 i've been using this lens for about 2 years in a Canon 750d, with surprising results in wildlife, specially birds and always handheld. I think it's (still is) the best value for money in the market.
I got the canon version earlier this year. Used it in combination with the MC-11 on my a73 at an airshow past summer and was quite happy with the results. Good hand held AF results.
Fantastic tip on the USB dock and OS settings. I've owned the lens for quite awhile now and I always thought the stabilization was a bit crap... handheld shots were always blurry. I finally bought a USB dock based on your comments and the Dynamic OS setting is fantastic, completely changed the lens for me. It's a shame you have to make a separate purchase to get this outstanding lens to perform to its full capabilities.
Great review! I love my 150-600 and I nearly always use it on a monopod. I find this a huge help in dealing with the weight for long periods and it's surprisingly easy to lug around all together, I just hook the lens over my shoulder and head off into the unknown....
🇨🇦... Hey there, Christopher. I've been humming and hawing for years, waiting for a reasonable 150-500 or 150-600mm lens to come into my price range. You helped me out here. Thanks bro.
Excellent review and I appreciated the balance between technical and practical speak :-) I was leaning towards this lens over the Sports model and the Tamaron. Your review convinced me to go this route and very satisfied with the choice. Even though it is relatively lighter still hitting the gym to help with those hand held shots. going to do some girls' lacrosse and soccer games and will likely go with a tripod or monopod for some then give the handheld a shot. I particularly appreciated your insights on the Custom and OS modes. Thank you
Another great review, as always. I rented this lens for a shoot a while back and I was very happy with it. Even managed to get a really nice big print out of this lens on an APS-C sensor
4:26 This is the main difference between Sigma and Tamron for anyone in doubt, other than these really not much difference between these two great lenses. I have had two Tamron 150- 600mm, Original and II Gen, and in no time both had a broken outer ring so no more lens sunshade can be attached as the ring is HIGHLY and notoriously fragile and breaks on slights hit, the last time a hi to the wall, as I was turning indoor!!!!!! I am still a Tamron fanboy but a fair one in that. So have to give this to Bigma!
4:15 That was the photography equivalent to a fork scraping against a plate :-) As always great review. I got a canon 40mm and 55-250mm stm based on your reviews and I'm so glad i did. Thanks.
@@c2h3cl82 really good. It is sharp, it focuses fast. It is light and so far no quality issues. Just keep in mind it is 5.6 so it is not the best in low light, but for the price is a great lens.
Great review as always. This is my go to lens for wildlife and simply love its performance on the A7III. Its like a new lens. They definitely kick ass with higher megapixel cameras especially at 600mm. Never understood why the Sigma Sport taps out to f6.3 at 340mm compared to the Contemporary at 483mm though considering the Sport is the more expensive lens. Only thing I would say is give the focus ring a few months and its as smooth as you like.
I love this lens. Perfect marriage with my 1Dx. Beast and Bazooka. I took recently few birds in flight and was super impressed with how sharp they came. All handheld.
Thank you Very much Christopher , I really love your films😊. When I turned 50 this summer, all i wanted was giftcards from The local camera store. I Got 22 😄 just enough to buy The Canon 100-400 I so wanted, since I saw your review of The lens (it is a fantastic lens for my 77d) Thank you again, and take Care. Many regards from Denmark😊
Great review Chris, very useful thanks. I have this lens paired with the 7D mkll and very happy with the results. It came with the x1.4 extender which I haven't really used yet, that would be a massive range.
I think it's important to use a duo battery pack on the camera in order to get not just the 150-600mm to properly operate (...and get full use of the AF) but with any other high-end lens regardless of the manufacturer. I'm sure plopping in a freshly charged 1800mA battery will provide ample power but after shooting in high frame rate, that battery's strength will quickly diminish - especially in a cold climate.
I agree it is nice to hear English voice. I have this lens and it is pretty good for the price. I will be setting the OSS to Dynamic to get better stabilization.
One of my favorite lens is an older Sigma: 300mm f/2.8 DG EX with 1.4x converter. This lens is an outstanding performer especially since it is not a modern "Art" lens.
The Sigma 180mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO macro is the single best overall macro lens in existence. Also predating the "Art" era. It has that unique combination of long working distance, stabilization, AF, and a bright wide open aperture, not to mention being razor sharp and when they say APO, they mean it. Yes, macro has lots of specialists, Canon MP-E... a number of Laowa lenses, etc... but I would say this Sigma is the overall king. I do wonder if they plan to refresh it soon, since the Art line is getting pretty filled out.
Been using this lens for a little over a year now, and I have to say that I love it for birding. I've gotten good results with my 5d classic, my Sony a7ii (w/ mc-11), and my Fuji X-T2 (w/ Fringer). I'm planning on upgrading to a Fuji X-h2 in the near future, and I hope it'll work well on that too. Just have to wait and see. This one is a keeper tho for sure 👌
Great stuff here, Christopher! I had been negotiating with my wife: She's getting a new bathroom for Christmas, and in return for that, she was going to get me the Canon 70-200 f/4. (I think that she won this particular transaction...) However, I recently picked up a Canon 100-400, which along with my 55-250, makes the 70-200 a bit redundant. The only lens left on my wish list is a 500mm some day. Note: I don't use mirrorless. I have my 1DX Mk III, a 7D Mk II, a 20D, and my original old 300D which is too much like an old friend to get rid of. I started reading reviews of the Sigma, watched a lot of videos here, and posted a few questions about it on the Canon forums. In sum, I've changed my Christmas wish list to the Sigma Contemporary. The Sport model was a bit more expensive, and since I'd classify myself as a semi-advanced hobbyist, I believe the Contemporary will serve me beautifully. I expect to pair it with my 1DX3, and/or my 7D2. REALLY looking forward to Christmas this year! 😉
@@callymw D500 is an APS-C camera so about the same, just may be a bit less usable with the D5600 having everything buried in menus and not on dials like they should be.
The moon sounds very impressive, especially with such a lens. Was it in full view with an APS-C ? I believed that the moon gives about 2mm per 100mm "focale" (sorry, I'm french), that means about 12mm for a 600mm. Many thanks for the video, cordially, Milos
I had this lens for a year and a half, ended up selling it because it was so large and heavy it was hard to bring any other lens with me. Upgrading to the RF 100-500 soon luckily.
“Spying on people…..don’t spy on people!” 😂 Love your reviews Chris, all the serious stuff we need to know with just the right amount of humour carefully chucked in for good measure! 👍
Great review I’m thinking of getting this lens for my Nikon d7500. Heard for the money it’s a really good lens. Love the shots of Aberporth and Penbryn by the way. My favourite part of the world. Thanks for sharing. 😊
Thanks for reviewing this lens Christopher. I enjoy your reviews because they follow a similar format and are to the point with little waffle. Could you please find the time to review the new Sigma 60-600 sports lens? In my opinion this new lens will be a best seller because of the image quality and the massive focal range, along with the just about affordable price for an enthusiast photographer.
Christopher, howdy from Uruguay, I have had that lens for more than a year, but as I live in the coast I found out that it got an odd stain of who knows what in the front lens... In my country no one can fix it... I loved the quality paired with my canon's but I finally bought the tamron lens (second version) and believe me it does a better job than this sigma. In fact I bought one, sold it after one year, and bought the same one back again LOL... I am a birding photographer, those lens are fundamental for me . Thanks for a good review to which I mostly agree!
"even portrait pictures, at 600mm you'll have to shout at your subject quite loudly though" - I'm dying of laughter at this. I never expected a zoom lens like this to even be considered for portrait work, so it took me completely by surprise.
Thank! I have this lens. Bought in June 2016. I love him very much. Hire Canon 70D and M5. On the M5 installed through the native adapter. With both cameras great shoots. The lens is 100% worth the money. The tripod leg of the lens can be removed and the rubber cap installed.
I have had the Sigma sport version for for a while, I used it with the original 7D APS-C). I tried it for a couple of weeks and could not get consistent sharp pictures, especially at the long end (600mm true 980mm). I then got myself a tripod and gimbal mount this improved the situation quite a lot but it still just did not get the results I have been hoping for. Finally I upgraded the camera to something with larger photosites (1Dmk4 APS-H sensor) what a difference. My overall conclusion is once the focal length get longer than a theoretical 450 mm (Full frame 300mm APS-C), it becomes disproportionately harder to control. There are a few video's on long lens Technique (Moose Paterson) worth a watch. It worked for me I can now get very crisp shots at 600mm (780mm true) most of the time.
Yep, I found the same when using the Sigma C on different Canon Aps-c bodies. I found the 80D to work the best all the way up to 600mm without any focus tuning and the 70d to be the worst. Sharpest pictures I've had have been with the 7dmkii with focus adjustment in with Sigma dock. 400mm pictures at around 15-20 metres were pushing prime quality in good light but found it to be less accurate past 20 metres to infinity at 600mm. On the A7III it needs zero focus adjustment and the AF sharpness plus 40 metres is simply scary but in a very good way. If anything the Sigma C on the A7III is like a completely different lens and works amazing in low light.
This is something shown on the canon european website. “As the resolution of cameras increases, and pixel sizes decrease, you may find that there is a need to use faster shutter speeds. The smaller pixels in cameras mean that any slight subject movement during the exposure is more likely to show up as subject blur - this is because it doesn’t have to move as far to affect more pixels. To avoid this just use a faster shutter speed than you would previously have done. For example, if you previously used 1/500sec, you could now try using 1/1000sec or faster.“ Shows the advantage of larger photosites and sort of explains it. There is a caveat however , I find at 6.3 @ 600mm I am alway fighting the light . most FF camera will live with 1600 to 3200. Thats not the case with APS-C cameras the higher magnification makes the problem worse. (you usually run out of higher ISO) it fine for Facebook but try to print an image out.
@@a20cae I photograph birds of prey regularly at a feeding station in the Brecon Beacons. Ive compared my work to other photographers with similar skill sets and those using prime lenses typically Nikon 200-500mm, 500mm f4 and Canon (100-400i/ii, 400mm f4 etc. I got to be firm on this one, I find that after using the Sigma contemporary for 2 years and really pushing it to the limits, as long as you take into consideration that you have to update the firmware, focus tune the lens (if it needs it for your camera) and be conservative about when you use your IS, it will deliver very sharp, prime quality photos up to around 450mm imho. Not to brag but I showed one of of my bird in flight photos to a Sony rep at this years birdfair and his jaw dropped. I can't repeat the words that came out of his mouth. Until Sigma deliver something like f4-5.6 the current contemporary for wildlife is unmatched imo. I doubt they could make a faster aperture lens like that without comprising weight. I owned the Canon 100-400i for a brief while. Stunning image quality not to different other than an extra stop of light but I definitely missed that extra reach the Sigma has and its got quick AF response. Focusing at 600mm on any lense takes skill when predicting movement and maintain balnce when shooting handheld. Although I got to say, having using the A7 III with this lens and MC-11 it will nail sharp shoots of subjects at distances of around 60m at 600mm in decent light without focus tuning. The pictures at this range will be soft but this sort of accuracy would not be achievable with a Dslr handheld or with a tripod.
Thanks for this review! I've had my eye on this lens for a while, finally I ordered this a few nights ago. Can't wait to try it out! My ONLY regret is I should have bought this 3, 4 weeks ago before the big Lunar eclipse in the US. (grr!) My 200mm did a decent job, but it could have been better. Oh well. I've seen some examples from tis lens capturing an indoor NHL hockey game, - this person was not that close from to the action which made it impressive. The lights, brice ice creates decent lighting...after some post processing the shots looked darn good I thought, slight grain in a few shots (looks like the ISO was jacked up a notch). I'll just have fun experimenting with this!
Thank you for the (quite long awaited) review, Chris. There seems to be some significant copy variation among the 150-600mm lenses. It's great you got a good one! Anyway, I can't comment without asking for something, right? So... the new Sigma 60-600mm looks promising at 600mm if you want to give it a look :)
Hi Chris, I’m going to upgrade my gear soon and I am really stuck between two cameras, now I am thinking of getting this lens (sigma 150-600 C) but the real question here for me is that I hope you can give me and answer which camera shall I go for? canon 90d or the canon 7d mark ii? I’m looking to do wildlife and of course I would like to print my shots so quality of the image would be important. Hope to hear back much appreciated, thanks for your reviews!
It's so nice to have an English video without the 'Yo, wud up guys! We're going to be super cool today voice!' Easy soft voice, content is great and no unnecessary drama. Call me old school, but I can actually concentrate.
That's because the video is about the lens, not about the photographer. Self-referential statements apply to the nature of cameras and tested applications, not specifically telling us that he's a pro or advertising services.
I completely agree with you
Couldn't agree more! Not once did he say "I'm gonna go ahead and...". Fark, that drives me crazy!!!
I even use Christopher's videos to learn english.. I mean proper english not just any english
@Eagleeye Jones You mean Jarrod. He's actially a nice guy and very knowledgable, but at 64 my ears just cant run as fast as his mouth. I use Chris all the time for good honest reviews. Gordon Laing is good too.
This guy is a best Lens review on youtube
i agree
Sun Vachana by far
That accent though
He's a chruch boy!
Thanks mum!
I've been using this lens for 2 years. Initially, the weight will be an issue for some when using hand-held (which is the best way to use it IMO). But after some use, you'll get used to using it. The sport version is simply too heavy for a lot of people. The lens is great fun and brilliant for birding, both for photography and actually using to identify birds. It's also a great lens for composition in dare I say, 'street photography' and creating these 'compressed' images. Great review Chris.
8:18 I would have never thought of putting vents in a lens hood but it completely makes sense. Without it it's just a big parachute to catch all the wind and shake you camera around
Very true, I don't even use hoods on very windy days for that exact reason.
Bro, YOU ARE SMART for pointing that out
I bought mine last September new. I certainly do not regret my purchase. I use it regularly on my Nikon D7200 and I believe it be a very good and sharp lens. I use it primarily for bird photography.
Hello is it possible to see ur birds photographs ? ^^
Hi I have a D7200 too, and I am debating between this one and the Nikkor 200-500mm... is your lens still performing well? Are you still happy with your purchase ?
@@andrecruz4484 Yes, I am. I still have it and still works well. I still don't regret the purchase. That being said, if I had a choice between the Sigma or the Nikkor, I would pick the Nikkor. This, in my opinion, does not mean that the Sigma isn't good. I just think the Nikkor is just an edge better in image quality. The Tamron G2 version is also good too. I don't think you will be disappointed in any of these choices.
Thank you for another great review. I'm using this lens with Canon 80D and it is razor sharp. Great lens for the money.
can i see some of the pics captured ?
I have been using this lens for the past 2 years at super bike events and have had brilliant results. Handheld at 600 on fast moving subjects and have the results I was looking for from behind the spectator fences
Thanks for what I believe to be the best review of this lens on RUclips. I purchased one and have struggled to get nice, consistently sharp images, married to a Nikon D7200, even on a mono-pod. I have the usb dock so will now use your recommended OS settings for C1, along with stopping down to f8. Thanks for all your time on this, look forward to improved results.
"Don't spy on people" 😆 Chris your reviews are both informative and entertaining!!
Seeing Chris' garden is the most wholesome thing I'll see all day.
go find bob ross and his squirrel
My hubby surprised me with this lens today, it was at the very top of my want-to-buy list! I am a wedding photographer by trade but I want to do a lot more nature photography and I also shoot our big airshow every year, so I am beyond excited to have this baby in my collection! Thanks for the great video, I really appreciate it!
How has it been? And what camera have you used it with?
Been waiting for this review for a long long time.
me too!
me too :)
Love your videos. Very informative. I also watched your "Letters" series and was very pleased. You are a true blessing not only to photographers, but to the world in general.
I got this lens one month ago (without the dock), for me it's the best ratio price / sharpness / weight for the 600mm range, built quality feel great, focusing is good, sometime difficult but my 6D play a role in that too. I managed to shoot a wild roe, hand-held at 516mm and at 1/160s, the result was surprisingly sharp, I can't wait to shoot more and more with it, the 600mm range opens up a lot of possibilities!
Thank you for such a great review! I just purchased this lens and have yet to use it in the field. This review is the best on the web. You do us a wonderful service!
I love the shot of the bird sitting on your test chart.
I've had several people tell me how soft this lens is at 600mm, I've had mine for about 5 years now and have used it on my old Canon 7D, my little M5, my R and now my R3, I have always been very happy with the results.
I've seen a lot of reviews of this lens and honestly, this one was the most comprehensive, all encompassing, clearly explained review (and on a side note, the BG music was pleasant, subtle and not obnoxious in it's levels)
Thanks! I'm mostly looking for lenses compatible with my Sony A6600 camera and not sure if I really would need the other reviews on your channel (to be fair, I haven't gone through the list of video reviews you have and only skimmed through it) but I'm so happy with your video, I decided to subscribe to your channel anyway :)
Thanks for your time, presentation and attention to details
LOL "This makes it the perfect lens for spying on people.... Don't spy on people."
I need a lens like this because i do spy on people as a private investigator :D
This is so pleasant to watch. Well done once again!
Great Review 👍 i've been using this lens for about 2 years in a Canon 750d, with surprising results in wildlife, specially birds and always handheld. I think it's (still is) the best value for money in the market.
I got the canon version earlier this year. Used it in combination with the MC-11 on my a73 at an airshow past summer and was quite happy with the results. Good hand held AF results.
Fantastic tip on the USB dock and OS settings. I've owned the lens for quite awhile now and I always thought the stabilization was a bit crap... handheld shots were always blurry. I finally bought a USB dock based on your comments and the Dynamic OS setting is fantastic, completely changed the lens for me. It's a shame you have to make a separate purchase to get this outstanding lens to perform to its full capabilities.
Thanks I have this lens and love it for my Sony A6500, A7RIII and A7III,using the Sigma MC-11 adapter. Cheers
Any issues with the focus with the A6500?
Great review! I love my 150-600 and I nearly always use it on a monopod. I find this a huge help in dealing with the weight for long periods and it's surprisingly easy to lug around all together, I just hook the lens over my shoulder and head off into the unknown....
Thank you fir taking the time to do this review. You f do I am amazing job. Impeccable!!
🇨🇦... Hey there, Christopher. I've been humming and hawing for years, waiting for a reasonable 150-500 or 150-600mm lens to come into my price range. You helped me out here. Thanks bro.
Excellent review and I appreciated the balance between technical and practical speak :-) I was leaning towards this lens over the Sports model and the Tamaron. Your review convinced me to go this route and very satisfied with the choice. Even though it is relatively lighter still hitting the gym to help with those hand held shots. going to do some girls' lacrosse and soccer games and will likely go with a tripod or monopod for some then give the handheld a shot. I particularly appreciated your insights on the Custom and OS modes. Thank you
As usual, the most comprehensive lens reviews. Great video! I hope to get one of these someday. I'd love to get pictures of the moon with it.
And another great review. In my humble opinion, the best reviews out there. Thanks Chris 👍
Thanks for the review. It's helped me with making my choice for the Sigma and a Sony
Always enjoy your reviews, Chris. Many thanks.
Excellent review...Thanks, I think a lot of people have been waiting for this.
I just took delivery of this lens. THANKS for your through review and walk through!
Love my Sigma 150-600C & Canon 80D combo. Have gotten some great wildlife images. Can't beat both for the price.
awesome. Got the lens and already had the camera. Hoping to get some goodness out of it. Did you have to use the sigma dock to get satisfying results?
Excellent review as always Christopher. Thank you for taking the time to do all your reviews so well.
Another great review, as always. I rented this lens for a shoot a while back and I was very happy with it. Even managed to get a really nice big print out of this lens on an APS-C sensor
4:26 This is the main difference between Sigma and Tamron for anyone in doubt, other than these really not much difference between these two great lenses. I have had two Tamron 150- 600mm, Original and II Gen, and in no time both had a broken outer ring so no more lens sunshade can be attached as the ring is HIGHLY and notoriously fragile and breaks on slights hit, the last time a hi to the wall, as I was turning indoor!!!!!!
I am still a Tamron fanboy but a fair one in that. So have to give this to Bigma!
4:15 That was the photography equivalent to a fork scraping against a plate :-)
As always great review.
I got a canon 40mm and 55-250mm stm based on your reviews and I'm so glad i did. Thanks.
Imma get that 55-250mm stm lens. How did it perform for you?
@@c2h3cl82 really good. It is sharp, it focuses fast. It is light and so far no quality issues. Just keep in mind it is 5.6 so it is not the best in low light, but for the price is a great lens.
@@doctorlovera Excellent! Thank you for your input. I don't really care much for the aperture caveat, so this will be a no-brainer for me.
"Don't spy on people" got it. *wink*
@@operationmindfuck7145 Umm mister, I'll let you know that I use this to spy on people and it works great! don't bash a product based on its size >:(
@@adrianborinsky2989 Not really spying when you are the most conspicuous object in the area.
It would be more subtle pointing a cannon at someone.
@@operationmindfuck7145 I was joking..
@@adrianborinsky2989 No such thing as jokes...no wait that's coincidences.
@@adrianborinsky2989 Size does matter then?
Great review as always. This is my go to lens for wildlife and simply love its performance on the A7III. Its like a new lens. They definitely kick ass with higher megapixel cameras especially at 600mm. Never understood why the Sigma Sport taps out to f6.3 at 340mm compared to the Contemporary at 483mm though considering the Sport is the more expensive lens. Only thing I would say is give the focus ring a few months and its as smooth as you like.
How is the video quality of this lens with A7lll?
Thanks for the review.
A local retailer has this lens on sale so I'll be buying one based on your recommendation.
I love this lens. Perfect marriage with my 1Dx. Beast and Bazooka.
I took recently few birds in flight and was super impressed with how sharp they came. All handheld.
Thank you Very much Christopher , I really love your films😊. When I turned 50 this summer, all i wanted was giftcards from The local camera store. I Got 22 😄 just enough to buy The Canon 100-400 I so wanted, since I saw your review of The lens (it is a fantastic lens for my 77d) Thank you again, and take Care. Many regards from Denmark😊
Henrik Carstensen wow 22! I’m lucky to get two! 👏🏾
This is a really swell summarization of this awesome lens. From a Burnley lad that now lives in Nashville :). Reet grand!
Thank you for this review, Christopher! I'd love to get a telephoto zoom sometime, trying to decide between Canon and Sigma. Enjoy your new lens! :)
Great review Chris, very useful thanks. I have this lens paired with the 7D mkll and very happy with the results. It came with the x1.4 extender which I haven't really used yet, that would be a massive range.
I think it's important to use a duo battery pack on the camera in order to get not just the 150-600mm to properly operate (...and get full use of the AF) but with any other high-end lens regardless of the manufacturer.
I'm sure plopping in a freshly charged 1800mA battery will provide ample power but after shooting in high frame rate, that battery's strength will quickly diminish - especially in a cold climate.
I've been waiting for Chris to review the APO version
Thanks Christ for your sharing, I got one last winter and love it for moon and bird capture.
Yet again another fantastic no thrills review. 10 out of 10.
excellent review. i've been thinking of getting this for my old canon 7d mainly for bird shots, likely with a mono pod. thanks
I agree it is nice to hear English voice.
I have this lens and it is pretty good for the price. I will be setting the OSS to Dynamic to get better stabilization.
One of my favorite lens is an older Sigma: 300mm f/2.8 DG EX with 1.4x converter. This lens is an outstanding performer especially since it is not a modern "Art" lens.
The Sigma 180mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO macro is the single best overall macro lens in existence. Also predating the "Art" era. It has that unique combination of long working distance, stabilization, AF, and a bright wide open aperture, not to mention being razor sharp and when they say APO, they mean it. Yes, macro has lots of specialists, Canon MP-E... a number of Laowa lenses, etc... but I would say this Sigma is the overall king. I do wonder if they plan to refresh it soon, since the Art line is getting pretty filled out.
Thank you, that was very helpful. I do enjoy your videos, you are straight to the point.
I'm using this lens with my Canon 90D to video birds and wildlife. I'm very pleased with the results. Great video BTW. Thanks for the review.
Been using this lens for a little over a year now, and I have to say that I love it for birding. I've gotten good results with my 5d classic, my Sony a7ii (w/ mc-11), and my Fuji X-T2 (w/ Fringer). I'm planning on upgrading to a Fuji X-h2 in the near future, and I hope it'll work well on that too. Just have to wait and see. This one is a keeper tho for sure 👌
05:10 I like the Word Documents the most!
Great stuff here, Christopher! I had been negotiating with my wife: She's getting a new bathroom for Christmas, and in return for that, she was going to get me the Canon 70-200 f/4. (I think that she won this particular transaction...) However, I recently picked up a Canon 100-400, which along with my 55-250, makes the 70-200 a bit redundant. The only lens left on my wish list is a 500mm some day. Note: I don't use mirrorless. I have my 1DX Mk III, a 7D Mk II, a 20D, and my original old 300D which is too much like an old friend to get rid of.
I started reading reviews of the Sigma, watched a lot of videos here, and posted a few questions about it on the Canon forums. In sum, I've changed my Christmas wish list to the Sigma Contemporary. The Sport model was a bit more expensive, and since I'd classify myself as a semi-advanced hobbyist, I believe the Contemporary will serve me beautifully. I expect to pair it with my 1DX3, and/or my 7D2. REALLY looking forward to Christmas this year! 😉
Happy to report that on the Sony A7III it works great!!
hows it work for BIF or fast moving stuff?
@@TheDarkhorse228 It works really good. As long as my shudder speed is right I get a high success rate. Much better than my Canon 70D did.
@Tim Lane thanks for feedback on your a7iii. I also have a7iii and waiting for this specific lens.
I don't experience any sticky turning of the focus and zoom ring.
I'm using the Sigma 150-600 C on a D500. It's the perfect wildlife combo.
Mike Bruschke glad I saw this comment, literally considering it for my D500. So thank you!
how do you think it would be with a d5600 ?
@@callymw D500 is an APS-C camera so about the same, just may be a bit less usable with the D5600 having everything buried in menus and not on dials like they should be.
hypercube33 thanks for the reply, I already purchased it and am having a blast haha.
@@callymw does the auto focus work on a non motorized body? thank you
Tack excellence as usual keep the good work you gave me a lot of valuable information
rarely see review of this one good work chirs
Great review, I even picked up some tips on how to get best results using ASP-C with this lens.
Tamron variant too?? Great video Chris!!
Love your style for your reviews 👍🏼
The moon sounds very impressive, especially with such a lens. Was it in full view with an APS-C ? I believed that the moon gives about 2mm per 100mm "focale" (sorry, I'm french), that means about 12mm for a 600mm. Many thanks for the video, cordially, Milos
I had this lens for a year and a half, ended up selling it because it was so large and heavy it was hard to bring any other lens with me. Upgrading to the RF 100-500 soon luckily.
How does it compare to the Sigma 100-400mm at around 400mm?
“Spying on people…..don’t spy on people!” 😂 Love your reviews Chris, all the serious stuff we need to know with just the right amount of humour carefully chucked in for good measure! 👍
I have this lens! It's amazing after you update its firmware to 2.0.
how's it different after the update?
Would the only reason to get the Canon f/11 600mm prime over this be the lighter build? Or am I missing something
Yes, the Sigma ist nearly 2 Stops (4x) brighter!
Thanks for the video, I'm going to keep an eye out for a second hand one for my Nikon d7200 🤸
Great review I’m thinking of getting this lens for my Nikon d7500. Heard for the money it’s a really good lens. Love the shots of Aberporth and Penbryn by the way. My favourite part of the world. Thanks for sharing. 😊
Great information about the sigma docking adapter.
Thanks for reviewing this lens Christopher. I enjoy your reviews because they follow a similar format and are to the point with little waffle. Could you please find the time to review the new Sigma 60-600 sports lens? In my opinion this new lens will be a best seller because of the image quality and the massive focal range, along with the just about affordable price for an enthusiast photographer.
I will eventually. It's going to be a huge pain to review but I will do it eventually
Nice subluminal message at 4:54 to 5:36 with the Word Documents Name :D
i just noticed that the test image in the bottom right of your image sheet is a shot of polperro! its a lovely town!
Christopher, howdy from Uruguay, I have had that lens for more than a year, but as I live in the coast I found out that it got an odd stain of who knows what in the front lens... In my country no one can fix it... I loved the quality paired with my canon's but I finally bought the tamron lens (second version) and believe me it does a better job than this sigma. In fact I bought one, sold it after one year, and bought the same one back again LOL... I am a birding photographer, those lens are fundamental for me . Thanks for a good review to which I mostly agree!
"even portrait pictures, at 600mm you'll have to shout at your subject quite loudly though" - I'm dying of laughter at this. I never expected a zoom lens like this to even be considered for portrait work, so it took me completely by surprise.
Thanks for a good no frills review.
Thank!
I have this lens. Bought in June 2016. I love him very much. Hire Canon 70D and M5. On the M5 installed through the native adapter. With both cameras great shoots.
The lens is 100% worth the money.
The tripod leg of the lens can be removed and the rubber cap installed.
Another M5 user commented this video writing about back focus problems, did you have any?
Thanks.
@@0000maxx0000 Did not have.
@@0000maxx0000 I'm currently using Canon R6. Autofocus works fine. No brakes.
I have had the Sigma sport version for for a while, I used it with the original 7D APS-C).
I tried it for a couple of weeks and could not get consistent sharp pictures, especially at
the long end (600mm true 980mm).
I then got myself a tripod and gimbal mount this improved the situation quite a lot but it still
just did not get the results I have been hoping for. Finally I upgraded the camera to something
with larger photosites (1Dmk4 APS-H sensor) what a difference. My overall conclusion is once the focal length get longer than a theoretical 450 mm (Full frame 300mm APS-C), it becomes disproportionately harder to control.
There are a few video's on long lens Technique (Moose Paterson) worth a watch.
It worked for me I can now get very crisp shots at 600mm (780mm true) most of the time.
Yep, I found the same when using the Sigma C on different Canon Aps-c bodies. I found the 80D to work the best all the way up to 600mm without any focus tuning and the 70d to be the worst. Sharpest pictures I've had have been with the 7dmkii with focus adjustment in with Sigma dock. 400mm pictures at around 15-20 metres were pushing prime quality in good light but found it to be less accurate past 20 metres to infinity at 600mm. On the A7III it needs zero focus adjustment and the AF sharpness plus 40 metres is simply scary but in a very good way. If anything the Sigma C on the A7III is like a completely different lens and works amazing in low light.
This is something shown on the canon european website.
“As the resolution of cameras increases, and pixel sizes decrease, you may find that there is a need to use faster shutter speeds. The smaller pixels in cameras mean that any slight subject movement during the exposure is more likely to show up as subject blur - this is because it doesn’t have to move as far to affect more pixels. To avoid this just use a faster shutter speed than you would previously have done. For example, if you previously used 1/500sec, you could now try using 1/1000sec or faster.“
Shows the advantage of larger photosites and sort of explains it. There is a caveat however , I find at 6.3 @ 600mm I am alway fighting the light .
most FF camera will live with 1600 to 3200. Thats not the case with APS-C cameras the higher magnification makes the problem worse.
(you usually run out of higher ISO) it fine for Facebook but try to print an image out.
@@a20cae I photograph birds of prey regularly at a feeding station in the Brecon Beacons. Ive compared my work to other photographers with similar skill sets and those using prime lenses typically Nikon 200-500mm, 500mm f4 and Canon (100-400i/ii, 400mm f4 etc. I got to be firm on this one, I find that after using the Sigma contemporary for 2 years and really pushing it to the limits, as long as you take into consideration that you have to update the firmware, focus tune the lens (if it needs it for your camera) and be conservative about when you use your IS, it will deliver very sharp, prime quality photos up to around 450mm imho.
Not to brag but I showed one of of my bird in flight photos to a Sony rep at this years birdfair and his jaw dropped. I can't repeat the words that came out of his mouth.
Until Sigma deliver something like f4-5.6 the current contemporary for wildlife is unmatched imo. I doubt they could make a faster aperture lens like that without comprising weight. I owned the Canon 100-400i for a brief while. Stunning image quality not to different other than an extra stop of light but I definitely missed that extra reach the Sigma has and its got quick AF response.
Focusing at 600mm on any lense takes skill when predicting movement and maintain balnce when shooting handheld. Although I got to say, having using the A7 III with this lens and MC-11 it will nail sharp shoots of subjects at distances of around 60m at 600mm in decent light without focus tuning. The pictures at this range will be soft but this sort of accuracy would not be achievable with a Dslr handheld or with a tripod.
Works perfectly with my R6, even can get the full 12fps after the latest firmware update. Find it surprisingly really sharp too.
Is it really sharp? I also have a R6, I’m really considering buying it :O but no idea!!
This was really helpful, thank you.
nice explanation.Thank you very much.Ibrought c 150mm to 600 .very good to click even to 6kilometers.
I am considering this or the Tamron G2 for my "Moon" shots. As the iso will by f/8 or f/11 which would you pick ?
I can't remember if either of them is sharper - I think they're about the same. Check out my review of the Tamron lens :-)
I wonder how well this performs with high resolution aps-c camera, like the 90D
that will be my wildlife lens for sure. with my 6d, it will look and perform nice.
Thanks for this review! I've had my eye on this lens for a while, finally I ordered this a few nights ago. Can't wait to try it out! My ONLY regret is I should have bought this 3, 4 weeks ago before the big Lunar eclipse in the US. (grr!) My 200mm did a decent job, but it could have been better. Oh well. I've seen some examples from tis lens capturing an indoor NHL hockey game, - this person was not that close from to the action which made it impressive. The lights, brice ice creates decent lighting...after some post processing the shots looked darn good I thought, slight grain in a few shots (looks like the ISO was jacked up a notch). I'll just have fun experimenting with this!
Hey! How's your experience with it?
Beast review yet… very detailed
Thank you for the (quite long awaited) review, Chris. There seems to be some significant copy variation among the 150-600mm lenses. It's great you got a good one! Anyway, I can't comment without asking for something, right? So... the new Sigma 60-600mm looks promising at 600mm if you want to give it a look :)
I've heard great things about it - I'm going to get in touch with Sigma UK to see if they can send me review copies of lenses next year
Send them a link to your channel and I bet they will.
love your vids, also i get the lens a few months ago and love it too on my 70D...best wishes and move on this way, please!:.
At 8:03 i actually started scratching top left corner of my laptop screen . #your sensor was dirty LOL
I am considering to pair this lens with my Olympus E-M1 Mark II for this documentary I'm working on.
Excellent - worth your effort 👍👍👍
Thanks for this as always very good video.
I'm looking forward to the next one.
Best regards
Maik
Hi Chris, I’m going to upgrade my gear soon and I am really stuck between two cameras, now I am thinking of getting this lens (sigma 150-600 C) but the real question here for me is that I hope you can give me and answer which camera shall I go for? canon 90d or the canon 7d mark ii? I’m looking to do wildlife and of course I would like to print my shots so quality of the image would be important. Hope to hear back much appreciated, thanks for your reviews!
6.3 is like almost the maximum aperture that my 600 f4 has with a 1.7x tele at 1000mm but that lens also weighs in at 6 kilogramms and kiloeuros ;)
Yeah your lens is stupidly expensive, don't try to compare it.
@@frostybe3r nope it is excellent in comparison to good at the Sigma
@@steffenrosmus1864 Nah. The sigma has half the sharpness.
@@frostybe3r at f 11 the Sigma is quite good 😉😂😂😂😂