Thank you my fellow Ed without your videos I would have not topped Ycs Santiago I studied everything you put out! Learned it enough to go undfeated in Swiss ! Appreciate your dedication to one of my favorite decks
I need to come back to the deck. I didn't have mental power to play it lately and I was choosing Melodious. but I really want to play RBs. maybe on one of the next locals as we have OTS Championship and WCQ Regional in about a month. thanks again for great video, I love watching your content 😁
I have been winning most events in my area, 10+ locals, world championship, OTS, and I wanted to share a personal spicy tech with you, because youve shared so much with us as well! I am using 1-2 sales ban in the main. The goal is you see your hand, you decide if you can play around nib or droll, and then you name the other one. It has given me countless games! You can also use it as a board breaker going second, you can name Flamberge, Princess, SP, or any archetype interruption, so its basically a card that fixes your issues going 1st and helps you break the board going 2nd. Try it and let me know your thoughts!
The issue with Time-tearing is that it is mathematically not a good option for short matches in modern Yu-Gi-Oh!, Jesse Perez has a good video about it. Here is the link if you're interested: ruclips.net/video/BJIaNXiVNsw/видео.htmlsi=g3M44Xfh5MaMI3Mc
I totally see his point but he only goes into detail about the hand advantage from the drawing. But the second normalsummon seems so good to me since it helps you play around handtraps and overall helps your combos. The “3rd” effect also comes into play in Rb since you can build some chainlinks on the normalsummon of lara and wen to guarantee that your effects resolve similar to Branded Lost. And from my experience the way your going 1st board gets broken usually is only with cards that guarantee a turn 3 like drnm and evenly. Going second I would obviously side it out but I think it could be a nice option for going first.
I feel our Yubel match-up is already pretty good. We got enough coverage with Protos and Ulti-Rei. If you need more help against the deck, the board breaker version is the stronger against it. If I were to play a rank 4, it would be Bagooska instead. Thanks for the comment!
If I have time, I'll for sure do some. I'm currently working on some big projects, but I might put something together if I can. Thanks for the comment!
New player, would recommend breakers, as that only requires you to know your deck. And ritual beasts has a lot of ways that you have to solitaire. Playing hand traps requires that you know every other deck’s choke points.
I’m probably not the most qualified to answer this question, but I wouldn’t recommend it. I mainly play Spright, but I’m trying to learn RB. Spright can arguably play rabbit better (link 2 lol), and for me personally it doesn’t feel great. Negating a summon is obviously powerful, but I would rather extend in a different way and have the other extra deck slot. I’m assuming it would feel the same with RB
@@ThatWetWet. I tested the rabbit for a bit, but I noticed it didn't perform as well as other options like Pitknight and IP. I would incentivite you to try Pitknight and see what you think. I don't think there is something wrong with playing the rabbit, but I would try other options and return to it if it feels like it is the best option after testing the others
I think rabbit is a solid choice because i needed a generic card so i can call light with protos which is great against white woods, fiendsmith and voiceless. In general we are able to call light while gaia or nochi are on the field and we protect them with sbtl in grave against destruction but we are not always able to do this and i think we should hold sbtl in grave for the opponents turn so i think it is worth to play rabbit and the second reason is in the most combos we end on 2 buddies so that we can make s:p or ulti-canna for tagging out but if we call dark we cant make s:p so we make rabbit which is an additional interruption with angel statue.
![Was Zigfried About To Defeat Kaiba? [One Step Ahead]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IVlEQNnuTs8/mqdefault.jpg)
![BabyChiefDoit - Too Slow (feat. STAR BANDZ) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zayaxws7RPg/mqdefault.jpg)
Thank you my fellow Ed without your videos I would have not topped Ycs Santiago I studied everything you put out! Learned it enough to go undfeated in Swiss ! Appreciate your dedication to one of my favorite decks
Thanks so much for the kind words and congratulations on the top! 🎉🎉
Thanks for the Nobel knight shield bearer tech
I need to come back to the deck. I didn't have mental power to play it lately and I was choosing Melodious. but I really want to play RBs. maybe on one of the next locals as we have OTS Championship and WCQ Regional in about a month. thanks again for great video, I love watching your content 😁
Thank you, very much for the insights! I learned a lot from your videos about the deck!
I have been winning most events in my area, 10+ locals, world championship, OTS, and I wanted to share a personal spicy tech with you, because youve shared so much with us as well! I am using 1-2 sales ban in the main. The goal is you see your hand, you decide if you can play around nib or droll, and then you name the other one. It has given me countless games! You can also use it as a board breaker going second, you can name Flamberge, Princess, SP, or any archetype interruption, so its basically a card that fixes your issues going 1st and helps you break the board going 2nd. Try it and let me know your thoughts!
@@Onailime11 this seems legit worth trying. Thanks for sharing 👍
Combos pitknight!!!!
I play eschatos with reprodocus to call fiend for g1.
I also side protos in matchups it's better in
Yeah, Eschatos has its merits. The additional atk helps you otk with just Eschatos and Accesscode, also it can be used as an extender during combos
What do you think about playing Time-Tearing Morganite in a boardbreaker Version?
The issue with Time-tearing is that it is mathematically not a good option for short matches in modern Yu-Gi-Oh!, Jesse Perez has a good video about it. Here is the link if you're interested: ruclips.net/video/BJIaNXiVNsw/видео.htmlsi=g3M44Xfh5MaMI3Mc
I totally see his point but he only goes into detail about the hand advantage from the drawing. But the second normalsummon seems so good to me since it helps you play around handtraps and overall helps your combos. The “3rd” effect also comes into play in Rb since you can build some chainlinks on the normalsummon of lara and wen to guarantee that your effects resolve similar to Branded Lost. And from my experience the way your going 1st board gets broken usually is only with cards that guarantee a turn 3 like drnm and evenly. Going second I would obviously side it out but I think it could be a nice option for going first.
You know you can't do any nemeses stuff anymore?@@aidenmonroe6324
Abyssdweller against yubel in this format?...
I feel our Yubel match-up is already pretty good. We got enough coverage with Protos and Ulti-Rei. If you need more help against the deck, the board breaker version is the stronger against it. If I were to play a rank 4, it would be Bagooska instead. Thanks for the comment!
Hey can u make like a video about ROTA and ritual beast would unprefer board breaker or handtraps? And is crossout an option or is it so tide
If I have time, I'll for sure do some. I'm currently working on some big projects, but I might put something together if I can. Thanks for the comment!
@@edygo24 thank u!!
As for a new player, would you recommend playing hand traps or board breakers?
New player, would recommend breakers, as that only requires you to know your deck. And ritual beasts has a lot of ways that you have to solitaire. Playing hand traps requires that you know every other deck’s choke points.
I agree with Nolan, I feel board breakers are easier to play 👍
Anyone here running silo rabbit in their deck? Ive been using it and i do like it but no one else seems to so i feel like im making a bad call.
I’m probably not the most qualified to answer this question, but I wouldn’t recommend it. I mainly play Spright, but I’m trying to learn RB. Spright can arguably play rabbit better (link 2 lol), and for me personally it doesn’t feel great. Negating a summon is obviously powerful, but I would rather extend in a different way and have the other extra deck slot. I’m assuming it would feel the same with RB
@@ThatWetWet. I tested the rabbit for a bit, but I noticed it didn't perform as well as other options like Pitknight and IP. I would incentivite you to try Pitknight and see what you think. I don't think there is something wrong with playing the rabbit, but I would try other options and return to it if it feels like it is the best option after testing the others
@@edygo24 thank you for the input
I think rabbit is a solid choice because i needed a generic card so i can call light with protos which is great against white woods, fiendsmith and voiceless. In general we are able to call light while gaia or nochi are on the field and we protect them with sbtl in grave against destruction but we are not always able to do this and i think we should hold sbtl in grave for the opponents turn so i think it is worth to play rabbit and the second reason is in the most combos we end on 2 buddies so that we can make s:p or ulti-canna for tagging out but if we call dark we cant make s:p so we make rabbit which is an additional interruption with angel statue.