@Retired Happily. Gui Minhai, a bookseller who holds a Swedish citizenship went missing while on vacay in Thailand in2015, Since then he's been in chinese detention for selling books.. So we can add China to the list ;)
Lee - good summary. I think a key thing here is did Ms Meng sign off on her instruction specifically to use USD in the Huawei transactions? Or did HSBC use this currency off their own initiative. I'd have thought it highly unlikely that she'd do this as she'll be fully aware of the implications using USD in her dealings with Iran & would have opted for another currency.
People with conscience all over the world, people with eyes all over the world, where are you? Where is your cry? If you do not speak for justice today, you will wait for evil to come to you tomorrow
The trial is just a show, political theatre. Canada will not dare to offend the US on this matter. Just look at how Julian Assange is being treated. The court denied his extradition, but the US appealed and he is still in a maximum security prison even though he never committed any crimes in the UK. I would bet that at best Meng will be under house arrest in Canada for years to come. I could even see her being "accidentally" handed over to FBI agents and taken across the border in the US. The Canadians would claim it was all a mistake and they thought the FBI just wanted to talk to her. Oops.
@@stopchinesecolonialism172 while they will stay and no way go home before Meng. If Meng don’t know how to be a CFO, then these Michaels don’t know why they should respect Chinese specifically when they are inside China. Freedom does not grant anyone the right to violate the law. By the way, Don’t transit in Canada, Even if you don’t plan to enter this country at all, you may be kidnapped by the customs, but they don’t even know why they arrested you.
The US sanction on Iran (or any other country) is illegal in the first place, and therefore any allegation made on the basis of violation of this unjustified sanction should be nullified without a doubt.
Thanks to Lee for sharing the video containing all the details of the case. Despite your optimism that Sabrina will be released I am anxious about her continued illegal detection and personal safety. I will pray for her release. (Man proposes God disposes.)
Read: *Toshiba Kongsberg scandal* Toshiba was blamed to been selling components to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, As a result of this the US used its security ties to pressure Japan into punishing Toshiba which involved fining the company; jailing its executives; and most notably forcing the company to "share" its technology unconditionally with its American competitors." Basically stealing Toshiba's technology. Also "Japan's successful catch-up in the semiconductor field brought great competitive pressure to the US semiconductor industry. Against this backdrop, the US started to play unfairly. In 1985, the US initiated a Section 301 case over alleged dumping of Japanese electronic products; meanwhile, the Plaza Accord resulted in a significant appreciation of the yen. It was under pressure from the US as the two countries signed the US-Japanese Semiconductor Agreement in 1986, placing restrictions on Japanese DRAM producers."
The book "The American trap" detailed how the US jailed a French power company executive to impose a huge fine and gained control of his company which was a direct competitor to a US power company.
@@truthtellerfreethinker7311 What make you think US C care about the 2 drug dealers when they have murdered zillion innocent people in middle east latin america asia and native america?
now the German Nord stream 2 pipe, USA don't give a shit to the allies only America first. they stop the German to buy cheaper gas from Russia but buy expensive LPG from American. its no brainer if Germany let them bully them to it
I seriously doubt Canada will release Sabrina, because USA will not let it happened. She became a bargaining chip. Think why Ren zhengfei said he will not see her daughter any more. It is really sad.
Great summation. On every count you mentioned Meng is innocent and should be freed. I hope you're right. Don't underestimate the pettiness and vindictiveness of politicians, especially those who use their office to intervene in the law of the land. Which Trudeau did with the SNC Lavalin scandal, and which led to the principled Chief Justice minister at the time to resign in protest... Hopefully somebody stands up for the law of the land...
@@ravencadd Of course the law should apply to the rich and powerful. That's exactly why Meng should be set free immediately. As Barrett so expertly explained the procedures used to arrest Meng were illegal and against Canadian law. I'm glad you support setting free the rich and powerful Meng. And I just know that you don't support politics interfering with the law which this clearly is...Why even Trump made that clear...
@@ravencadd Ummm, uhhh, the fact that HSBC is so deceptive in their dealings with Meng and the deliberate bending of the legalities by the Canadian authorities in carrying out the arrest of Meng clearly shows that law was NEVER a consideration. What else could it be if not politics...? Yes, it is up to the courts and if the government can play politics with the courts vis a vis SNC Lavalin then what assurance is there that they will not do the same with Meng considering their slavish and cowardly attitude toward the US...? In that I hope I'm wrong... Then I'll have a glass of bubbly...!
Great effort Lee it has gotten a bit too complicated for my small brain I imagine putting this video together is quite impressive to me thank you Lee regards GL
Lee, thank you for your updates on Sabrina Meng. There are so much additional information of her case. Hoping to see a favorable outcome soon and Sabrina will be free to leave Vancouver and back to China.
understatement... China is aware and now the world is aware of the Western forces revealing themselves from the shadows and which side theyre on.... correction China/Chinese have always been aware, China has teased them out of the darkness and into broad daylight where the fence sitting or the ignorant will now see... America Canada UK Australia HSBC H&M NIKE etc..... Forget about the US having an axis of evil list.... China doesnt need a list, has all the guys from back in the day memorised and knows how to deal with them as China grows stronger, Chinas influence and grip will strengthen... China wont use force.... but the culprits will be forced to yield by themselves..... 'Fighting without fighting'
I believe what has been missed here is the mention of U.S. sanctions on dealings with Iran, and Huawei through its bank the HSBC transacted U.S. dollars in dealings with Iran, through its New York clearing centre. This being the reasons criminal charges were laid by New York. It would have been more prudent for Huawei to transact its dealings with Iran in Euro, through European trading houses, thus, eliminating the sanctions issue. This of course is another situation however, whereby the U.S, having created the US$ as the primary world trading currency, is using it for its own political purposes. To my way of thinking, the US$ no longer has the security which has always been associated with it, thus is being overvalued.
It is a dream. Even she is purely innocent, Canada will not set her free. USA would not allow this action. Justice is all depends on money and power, not the truth. Thank you for your sincerely analysis.
I certainly hope so. If Canada goes ahead then it will be a huge hit to the credibility of their legal system. Half my family are Canadians and anti-China but even they see through this for what it is.
@@MicCheckMemoirs Looks like to know very little about east. I was born and raised in east and we had more freedom, what you have in the west this days. Today east is more advance than North America. The west is sinking, while the east is on the rise.
@@joedoe9769 meanwhile countries like North Korea, India, Pakistan, and rural parts of China are still underdeveloped. Thanks to western influence, Japan and south Korea are succeeding. China Exploits your people and work them like dogs, which you truly are
@@MicCheckMemoirs "China exploits people and make them work like dogs" Bruh , you shouldve included "Japan" on that one. In Japan , some of the workers literally die of exhaustion due to overworking , and theres also a system called "Job Hunting" , which is what japanese people hated the most. In South Korea , it's a MUST DO for you to join the army at the age of 18-28 , even KPOP Members and professional athletes has to follow this rule. What about the US? Well , theres too much freedom and democracy that a whole nation was ruined into pieces because of it. Infact , the citizens doesnt deserve democracy and when Britain just arrived on eastern america , settlers started ignoring the fact that theyre not allowed to enter france's territory. This is the same thing that happened on Hawaii , the US forced the ruling monarch to abdicate so that they can claim the island. Another thing happened to Mexico , they had to lose Texas because of the settlers sent by the US.
Errrr.. i found 5 holes in your story.... u haven't covered this 100%.... if you were at school i would grade you at 56% .. only for effort... BTW how do you pronounce H.... OMG.... needs improvement.....
Thanks for a clear rendition of the events, hopefully the rule of law in Canada will release Ming in spite of the political pressure from Trudeau and the Canadian conservatives.
Idk, Trudeau blocked me on Twitter after I complained of Meng’s detention and said it proved Canada has allowed the US to make them their b*tch. I don’t see any rule of law being followed at all (and I have a law degree).
The dirty game playing out by US as the culprit ,Canada as the accomplice. They had to pay heavily knowingly causing the unnecessary pain n suffering of the Hauwai princess. Go Pirncess go , your time to say out loud to tell the world.
Dear Lee, you are great and made great legal points in the most layman terms for everyone. Love you both and love your production! Hi from Hong Kong. Hope to meet you in China one day. Cheers
WELL, THIS IS A HIGHLY POLITICAL CASE DELIBERATELY BROUGHT ABOUT BY CANADIAN AND US AUTHORITIES. CAN THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM REMAIN INDEPENDENT AND APOLITICAL UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES. I WILL RESERVE JUDGEMENT FOR NOW BUT THANK YOU FOR THIS EXCELLENT PRESENTATION.
She was detained 1st of December 2018, today is April 19, 2021. It's been 2 years 4 months. Canada will continue to drag its heels waiting for Washington to call the shots. Meanwhile, the private security firm mandated by the court as part of her bail condition costs 1+ $million$ a year. The firm is ex-police officers. People are making $$$, lawyers, the court, police, sheriffs, media, everyone, there's no reason to stop. Like everything in this world, it's all about the dollars.
There are surely moves made behind the scene for the release of the 2 Canadians held in China in exchange for Sabrina. Thus there will be no legal decisions made in both legal jurisdictions that will jeopardize such an outcome. I think China will release one of the two to begin with in order to show good faith.
Why don’t you do an opinion piece about the two Michaels? How they have been imprisoned vs “Sabrina”. Do they get to o shopping, eating out restaurants, have their families with them, access to lawyers and consulate officials? What? No? Then perhaps it will be a good thing that “Sabrina” ends up in a prison in the US, where she will have to turn herself out to survive, like the poor Uyghur women in East Turkmenistan
Canada and US government support HK rioters to against Extradition Bills. However, they use same bills to detent Meng illegally for over two years. What a double standard. 😏😏😏
All critical government entities comply to ISO policy, where all documents archived for more than 7years, surely including evidences and information from critical cases like such. In 2021, there's no emails not leaving footprint and impossible to be irrecoverable. Only old school law enforcer still do not know the strength of their IT department, and IT department needs to be called upon to clarify that 'yes, all emails are recoverable', period.
Yeah right. But a judicial system, once triggered, has a mind on its own. Despite it’s been politically motivated, it can’t be easily removed by political pressure once triggered. Unless US withdraws the charge, good luck. Very tactical move by the US side.
Come on, guys. There's no proper case was filed in court. No requisites complaint, no summon was served on her, no preliminary investigation was conducted to find probable cause, considering fraud is not covered by summary procedure. Likewise, if she's not notified, the Federal Court has no jurisdiction over her person and it is clearly a violation of her constitutional right to due process. Once the constitution is violated, the court acquires no jurisdiction over the subject matter. The arrest warrant is illegally issued against her by the judge. She's presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, right?
Unfortunately, I think this will end up like Assange, where no release will ever come into play for either party, though hopefully better treatment than Assange. Sabrina's father also said he will never see her daughter again 😞
TBH I don't think Canada would free Meng any time soon, since it would be like slamming its own face. She might be kept there as long as Canada government likes.
Don't think she will be free unless instructed by US. That will be a huge slap in the face, unless, US can gain something politically or economically, it won't happen.
So, are you going to mane an opinion piece about the “Two Michaels?” That is, the two Canadian citizens arrested and detained shortly after Ms. Meng was taken into custody. Do you see a connection between these events? Are the two Canadians hostages, being used to pressure Canada to release Ms. Meng? You are so very detailed in your call out of irregularities and potential injustice in the Meng case - are you similarly concerned with potential injustice being perpetrated by China in the case of the “Two Michaels?”
This is a political issue rather than a legal one. If Meng Wanzhou is acquitted, Canada will be suspected of being close to China. Therefore, it has nothing to do with Meng Wanzhou, but has something to do with Canada.
She think she is untouched by using HK passport but she lose the bet, The Canadian still made the arrested per US requested. Good luck of getting out of this round get ready for the extradite and face US Court system.
Barrett感謝你倆父子真誠的替我們中國說出真話，真相~令人感動敬佩！中國香港人支持你們！🥰🥰
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
如果美国要重新回到伊朗核协定，而由此取消相关对伊朗的制裁，那他们要起诉或引渡孟晚舟的论据还存在吗？
好提问
太阳从西边出来的话可以，或者美国和中国有一个从地球上消失。孟女士只是美中争霸中，由美国偷袭的热身赛。
這件事本來就跟所謂伊朗核協定沒有什麼關係，流氓耍手段，莫須有就可以了。加拿大要不是真的無恥就是真白痴，非要揀這個燙手山芋。孟晚舟是中國公民，並沒未入境加拿大沒有違反任何加拿大法律，而美國要求加拿大遞補孟是因為基於兩國之間的引渡協定，而確定引渡與否既一個條件為雙重犯罪，而美國的指控是詐騙(詐騙在加拿大同樣犯罪)，那麽問題來了，華為中國公司不是上市公司更不在美國上市，與美國沒有直接關係，匯豐英國公司，香港分部，與美國沒有直接關係，所以中國公司詐騙英國銀行，跟美國有關係?什麼邏輯，詐騙罪成立與否在於受害者有否利益損失，匯豐顯然是通過這間公司獲益的，然後匯豐說一個新丁跟華為cfo談業務，匯豐不知情? 詐騙的是匯豐吧，就算要告詐騙也是英國匯豐告華為詐騙，跟美加有關係，而且匯豐提供文件還有所隱藏，加拿大法官不公開所呈文件，也不接納新文件，所以這是一宗切頭切尾既流氓綁架案，慶幸有中國政府做後台，像法國阿爾斯通早就跪了
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
You guys are really the best! ❤️👍🏻
@‘輪 運 獨’RUclipsr說中國很地獄,中國人很無奈 hii
Lots of facts and timeline consistency. Respect goes to you sir!
希望孟小姐以後不要到處亂跑了⋯⋯
國外很危險滴！
不现实，华为是跨国企业，除非他养老
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
@@8说了给爷冲 是的，就算不是她负责跨境业务，也会有其他人负责，谁做都一样，就只是想抓华为的人，理由随便安，用国家的权利去绑架一个老百姓
没做错事何来惧怕到处跑 你看现在香港人在国外都是到处欢迎的 何况孟那么多国外国籍 在加拿大软禁期间都已经上了加拿大pr
Thanks for covering this Barrett!
If politics overrides international law, I can't imagine what the world is going to be like.
@Retired Happily. you mean Uncle Scam and his 5 Blind eyes.....
@Retired Happily. Gui Minhai, a bookseller who holds a Swedish citizenship went missing while on vacay in Thailand in2015, Since then he's been in chinese detention for selling books.. So we can add China to the list ;)
what the hell of so called democracy
Lee - good summary. I think a key thing here is did Ms Meng sign off on her instruction specifically to use USD in the Huawei transactions? Or did HSBC use this currency off their own initiative. I'd have thought it highly unlikely that she'd do this as she'll be fully aware of the implications using USD in her dealings with Iran & would have opted for another currency.
People with conscience all over the world, people with eyes all over the world, where are you? Where is your cry? If you do not speak for justice today, you will wait for evil to come to you tomorrow
The trial is just a show, political theatre. Canada will not dare to offend the US on this matter. Just look at how Julian Assange is being treated. The court denied his extradition, but the US appealed and he is still in a maximum security prison even though he never committed any crimes in the UK.
I would bet that at best Meng will be under house arrest in Canada for years to come.
I could even see her being "accidentally" handed over to FBI agents and taken across the border in the US. The Canadians would claim it was all a mistake and they thought the FBI just wanted to talk to her. Oops.
Unfortunately this event has elevated beyond justice and reality.
中国香港粉丝向你致敬👍👍💪💪❤️,你為我們中國向世界講實話,十四亿中國人民支持你。🇨🇳🇭🇰
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
感謝您父子倆為中國及孟晚舟女士發聲。
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
@@中国文化-k2e 呢种係国际挷架。
@@中国文化-k2e 可告上国际法庭。
欲加之罪何患无辞？
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
感谢英国父子为正义发声！
Conclusion : trade with American dollar is danger. You can be arrest for that.
Huawei is a criminal organization.
By phone ? 😂 well stay in your china phobia, maybe it could help you out of close problems
Better than yuan
@@coccinelle8482 FREE THE TWO MICHAELS
@@stopchinesecolonialism172 while they will stay and no way go home before Meng.
If Meng don’t know how to be a CFO, then these Michaels don’t know why they should respect Chinese specifically when they are inside China.
Freedom does not grant anyone the right to violate the law.
By the way, Don’t transit in Canada, Even if you don’t plan to enter this country at all, you may be kidnapped by the customs, but they don’t even know why they arrested you.
The US sanction on Iran (or any other country) is illegal in the first place, and therefore any allegation made on the basis of violation of this unjustified sanction should be nullified without a doubt.
Thanks to Lee for sharing the video containing all the details of the case. Despite your optimism that Sabrina will be released I am anxious about her continued illegal detection and personal safety. I will pray for her release. (Man proposes God disposes.)
Read: *Toshiba Kongsberg scandal*
Toshiba was blamed to been selling components to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, As a result of this the US used its security ties to pressure Japan into punishing Toshiba which involved fining the company; jailing its executives; and most notably forcing the company to "share" its technology unconditionally with its American competitors." Basically stealing Toshiba's technology.
Also "Japan's successful catch-up in the semiconductor field brought great competitive pressure to the US semiconductor industry. Against this backdrop, the US started to play unfairly. In 1985, the US initiated a Section 301 case over alleged dumping of Japanese electronic products; meanwhile, the Plaza Accord resulted in a significant appreciation of the yen. It was under pressure from the US as the two countries signed the US-Japanese Semiconductor Agreement in 1986, placing restrictions on Japanese DRAM producers."
The book "The American trap" detailed how the US jailed a French power company executive to impose a huge fine and gained control of his company which was a direct competitor to a US power company.
@@j.t.magellan6159 The French company. You mean Alstom? Yea i know about that too!
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.,,,
She must be realise without any condition.
That what Canadians snd Americans want back Michael Kovig and Michael Spavor.
@@truthtellerfreethinker7311 What make you think US C care about the 2 drug dealers when they have murdered zillion innocent people in middle east latin america asia and native america?
@@imdba3685 Drugs dealers?
Michael Kovig and Michael Spavor not drug dealers claimed to be spies Robert LIoyd Schellenberg probably Executed.
@@imdba3685 Robert L.Schellenberg smuggled in Thailand as well was in Canada he was arrested in drugs as well drunk driving too.
@@truthtellerfreethinker7311 Thank you for the truth
Alstom in France must have a deeper feeling than Huawei
now the German Nord stream 2 pipe, USA don't give a shit to the allies only America first. they stop the German to buy cheaper gas from Russia but buy expensive LPG from American. its no brainer if Germany let them bully them to it
HSBC should be held responsible! He had all information required....
50 cents
@@stopchinesecolonialism172 Which place is colonized by China? I hope your can answer and give me a real laugh 😂🤣
China should stop trading with hsbc.
I seriously doubt Canada will release Sabrina, because USA will not let it happened. She became a bargaining chip. Think why Ren zhengfei said he will not see her daughter any more. It is really sad.
FREE THE TWO MICHAELS
Great summation. On every count you mentioned Meng is innocent and should be freed. I hope you're right. Don't underestimate the pettiness and vindictiveness of politicians, especially those who use their office to intervene in the law of the land. Which Trudeau did with the SNC Lavalin scandal, and which led to the principled Chief Justice minister at the time to resign in protest... Hopefully somebody stands up for the law of the land...
@@ravencadd Of course the law should apply to the rich and powerful. That's exactly why Meng should be set free immediately. As Barrett so expertly explained the procedures used to arrest Meng were illegal and against Canadian law.
I'm glad you support setting free the rich and powerful Meng. And I just know that you don't support politics interfering with the law which this clearly is...Why even Trump made that clear...
@@ravencadd Ummm, uhhh, the fact that HSBC is so deceptive in their dealings with Meng and the deliberate bending of the legalities by the Canadian authorities in carrying out the arrest of Meng clearly shows that law was NEVER a consideration. What else could it be if not politics...?
Yes, it is up to the courts and if the government can play politics with the courts vis a vis SNC Lavalin then what assurance is there that they will not do the same with Meng considering their slavish and cowardly attitude toward the US...? In that I hope I'm wrong... Then I'll have a glass of bubbly...!
Great effort Lee it has gotten a bit too complicated for my small brain I imagine putting this video together is quite impressive to me thank you Lee regards GL
It depends on the US say whatever like, Canada legal system is just a mockery
智者爸爸說的太好了！超有見地！點👍！
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
good job ！thx
很明显是政治操作
他稿子背得挺熟
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
Lee, thank you for your updates on Sabrina Meng. There are so much additional information of her case.
Hoping to see a favorable outcome soon and Sabrina will be free to leave Vancouver and back to China.
If found not guilty, will the Canadian govt pay for loss of income & all expenditure to the defendant?
你的观点很明确 我喜欢你的观点 视频
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
Thank you for the insight. HSBC must be regretting what they have done. It must have caused them a lot of head aches.
understatement... China is aware and now the world is aware of the Western forces revealing themselves from the shadows and which side theyre on....
correction China/Chinese have always been aware, China has teased them out of the darkness and into broad daylight where the fence sitting or the ignorant will now see... America Canada UK Australia HSBC H&M NIKE etc.....
Forget about the US having an axis of evil list.... China doesnt need a list, has all the guys from back in the day memorised and knows how to deal with them as China grows stronger, Chinas influence and grip will strengthen... China wont use force.... but the culprits will be forced to yield by themselves..... 'Fighting without fighting'
HSBC has betrayed its Customers by giving their transaction to third party. China should ban HSBC from China and HK.
And meeting the customer at a hotel but not in the office for impt business documents.🙄???
I've never quite understood it, so a Chinese citizen was arrested in Canada for not following U.S. sanctions on Iran?
I believe what has been missed here is the mention of U.S. sanctions on dealings with Iran, and Huawei through its bank the HSBC transacted U.S. dollars in dealings with Iran, through its New York clearing centre. This being the reasons criminal charges were laid by New York. It would have been more prudent for Huawei to transact its dealings with Iran in Euro, through European trading houses, thus, eliminating the sanctions issue. This of course is another situation however, whereby the U.S, having created the US$ as the primary world trading currency, is using it for its own political purposes. To my way of thinking, the US$ no longer has the security which has always been associated with it, thus is being overvalued.
Undoubtedly the case against Ms Meng appears to have all the ingredients suggesting it’s a political motivated case.
It is a dream. Even she is purely innocent, Canada will not set her free. USA would not allow this action. Justice is all depends on money and power, not the truth. Thank you for your sincerely analysis.
Thanks for the update, good to hear the good news impending.
I certainly hope so. If Canada goes ahead then it will be a huge hit to the credibility of their legal system. Half my family are Canadians and anti-China but even they see through this for what it is.
Anti-China? That's another word for racism
@@mustafajuventino9964 50 cents
China👈KANGAROO COURTS 😀
@@mustafajuventino9964 Sadly so
@@stopchinesecolonialism172 Nah, that's Australia
Thank you Barrett!
Meng Wanzhou is INNICENT, but I am not sure, if she gone be set free. In western worlds is not about justice. It's about serve the master
simply she has been taken or rather abducted as a political hostage
“Serve the master”? That’s the complete opposite of the west. The east is more of, “obey or face serve punishment”
@@MicCheckMemoirs Looks like to know very little about east. I was born and raised in east and we had more freedom, what you have in the west this days. Today east is more advance than North America. The west is sinking, while the east is on the rise.
@@joedoe9769 meanwhile countries like North Korea, India, Pakistan, and rural parts of China are still underdeveloped. Thanks to western influence, Japan and south Korea are succeeding. China Exploits your people and work them like dogs, which you truly are
@@MicCheckMemoirs
"China exploits people and make them work like dogs"
Bruh , you shouldve included "Japan" on that one.
In Japan , some of the workers literally die of exhaustion due to overworking , and theres also a system called "Job Hunting" , which is what japanese people hated the most.
In South Korea , it's a MUST DO for you to join the army at the age of 18-28 , even KPOP Members and professional athletes has to follow this rule.
What about the US? Well , theres too much freedom and democracy that a whole nation was ruined into pieces because of it. Infact , the citizens doesnt deserve democracy and when Britain just arrived on eastern america , settlers started ignoring the fact that theyre not allowed to enter france's territory.
This is the same thing that happened on Hawaii , the US forced the ruling monarch to abdicate so that they can claim the island.
Another thing happened to Mexico , they had to lose Texas because of the settlers sent by the US.
Errrr.. i found 5 holes in your story.... u haven't covered this 100%.... if you were at school i would grade you at 56% .. only for effort... BTW how do you pronounce H.... OMG.... needs improvement.....
👍👍👍
Good story. Although You're going for Canadas and the USAs heart here. They so want her to be guilty of ....... something?
Everyone should realize that China has always been rising strongly under pressure, and I believe Huawei is the same.
Thanks for a clear rendition of the events, hopefully the rule of law in Canada will release Ming in spite of the political pressure from Trudeau and the Canadian conservatives.
Idk, Trudeau blocked me on Twitter after I complained of Meng’s detention and said it proved Canada has allowed the US to make them their b*tch. I don’t see any rule of law being followed at all (and I have a law degree).
American press likes to call other countries rogue countries, what an irony!
well expained, i will share this video to the Canadian judge.
The low-level means of holding hostages. Just like a child.
The US n Canada knew that Meng isnot guilty and just took her as hostage in dealing with Huawei. And also let Canadian lawyers got richer
50 cents
@@stopchinesecolonialism172 you’ll be commie soon 😂😂😂
Release her ASAP🙏🙏🙏
分析得很正確,美國佬想怎樣就怎樣。
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
我英文不好只能用中文留言，孟事件連想到少林足球：地球很危險，趕快回火星啊……....只要有美國存在（被逼吞毒pig ）！
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
The dirty game playing out by US as the culprit ,Canada as the accomplice. They had to pay heavily knowingly causing the unnecessary pain n suffering of the Hauwai princess. Go Pirncess go , your time to say out loud to tell the world.
支持你們兩父子，太勇敢了，講出美國陰谋
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
Dear Lee, you are great and made great legal points in the most layman terms for everyone. Love you both and love your production! Hi from Hong Kong. Hope to meet you in China one day. Cheers
Now, the US is criticising Belarus for illigally intercepting airplanes !?
B兄，你跟你的兒子
最好就留在中國吧~
回國可能會有麻煩！
給你的建議
That is not the bully style of US mate. If they do that then Meng can sue them back for compensation, right?
America must compensate $1 billion USD for illegal arrest
Everyone I know with a Huawei phone in the US, has had unrestricted use of their phone this whole time.
FBI and Canadian authorities are so disgusting! Sabrina Meng should sue for billions compensation！.
感谢你们两父子为孟晚舟发出正义的声音 加拿大的做法天怒人怨 恶魔之行 必遭天遣！
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
😀😀😀👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
respect for your courage to tell the truth.
USA, Canada, they are so dirty.
Thanks Lee
I like your presentation: concise and precise 👍
台灣人來支持一下👍
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
㊗️🌷
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
來自香港 孟晚舟 黑仔 遇到狼狽為 間
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
真心祈祷孟晚舟早日回到中国，与家人团聚。时代让你成为中国普通人心中的英雄，你不愧为中国人。
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失....
CANADA IS GONNA PAY THE PRICE FOR U.S BUMBLING IT HAS ALREADY BEGUN.
这英国父子是有良知的媒体人
美国和加拿大的引渡条约只能对他们自己双方的公民产生法律效力,不能对第三国公民产生法律效力.试想,如果两家人签个合同,就能把其中一家的仇人交给对方,这世界不全乱套了吗?如果双方签个法律条文就可以把对方想抓的人抓起来交给对方,那当事人的国家会承认你这样做的合法合理性?同理,双方两个国家不签这样的引渡条约,难道就不能把对方想抓的人扣起来交给对方?区别在于签了合约的必须得抓起来交给对方,没签合约的可以交也可以不交,但对第三国而言都是非法的.因为,被你抓的人并没有在你国犯罪,你也没和被抓人的国家签引渡合约,怎么就能抓住他人给对方?这完全是流氓和属于犯罪行为.加拿大应该加倍赔偿孟晚舟和他家人及华为的一切引非法扣押孟晚舟而带来的所有损失,包括中国的国家损失.
My guess she not be go but send to the US because Canada is not rude by Canadian is run by the US.
Good👍
I love hua wei
Objective opinion, how it will be hard for US and Canada to accept!
I don't know if there will be compensation for being wronged.
WELL, THIS IS A HIGHLY POLITICAL CASE DELIBERATELY BROUGHT ABOUT BY CANADIAN AND US AUTHORITIES. CAN THE CANADIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM REMAIN INDEPENDENT AND APOLITICAL UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES. I WILL RESERVE JUDGEMENT FOR NOW BUT THANK YOU FOR THIS EXCELLENT PRESENTATION.
She was detained 1st of December 2018, today is April 19, 2021. It's been 2 years 4 months. Canada will continue to drag its heels waiting for Washington to call the shots. Meanwhile, the private security firm mandated by the court as part of her bail condition costs 1+ $million$ a year. The firm is ex-police officers. People are making $$$, lawyers, the court, police, sheriffs, media, everyone, there's no reason to stop. Like everything in this world, it's all about the dollars.
There are surely moves made behind the scene for the release of the 2 Canadians held in China in exchange for Sabrina. Thus there will be no legal decisions made in both legal jurisdictions that will jeopardize such an outcome. I think China will release one of the two to begin with in order to show good faith.
我们的朋友遍天下
Why don’t you do an opinion piece about the two Michaels? How they have been imprisoned vs “Sabrina”. Do they get to o shopping, eating out restaurants, have their families with them, access to lawyers and consulate officials? What? No? Then perhaps it will be a good thing that “Sabrina” ends up in a prison in the US, where she will have to turn herself out to survive, like the poor Uyghur women in East Turkmenistan
Canada and US government support HK rioters to against Extradition Bills. However, they use same bills to detent Meng illegally for over two years. What a double standard. 😏😏😏
Meng wanzhou is guilty 4 promoting hauwei in iran. And 4 being hauwei...accord to usa gov pre emptive verdict guilty canada equal partner..
All critical government entities comply to ISO policy, where all documents archived for more than 7years, surely including evidences and information from critical cases like such. In 2021, there's no emails not leaving footprint and impossible to be irrecoverable. Only old school law enforcer still do not know the strength of their IT department, and IT department needs to be called upon to clarify that 'yes, all emails are recoverable', period.
Very nice video. Support. Thanks for telling the truth
Yeah right. But a judicial system, once triggered, has a mind on its own. Despite it’s been politically motivated, it can’t be easily removed by political pressure once triggered. Unless US withdraws the charge, good luck. Very tactical move by the US side.
Come on, guys. There's no proper case was filed in court. No requisites complaint, no summon was served on her, no preliminary investigation was conducted to find probable cause, considering fraud is not covered by summary procedure. Likewise, if she's not notified, the Federal Court has no jurisdiction over her person and it is clearly a violation of her constitutional right to due process. Once the constitution is violated, the court acquires no jurisdiction over the subject matter. The arrest warrant is illegally issued against her by the judge. She's presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, right?
Unfortunately, I think this will end up like Assange, where no release will ever come into play for either party, though hopefully better treatment than Assange. Sabrina's father also said he will never see her daughter again 😞
TBH I don't think Canada would free Meng any time soon, since it would be like slamming its own face. She might be kept there as long as Canada government likes.
Don't think she will be free unless instructed by US. That will be a huge slap in the face, unless, US can gain something politically or economically, it won't happen.
With heavy pressure from US, not sure Canada will not fold
So, are you going to mane an opinion piece about the “Two Michaels?” That is, the two Canadian citizens arrested and detained shortly after Ms. Meng was taken into custody. Do you see a connection between these events? Are the two Canadians hostages, being used to pressure Canada to release Ms. Meng? You are so very detailed in your call out of irregularities and potential injustice in the Meng case - are you similarly concerned with potential injustice being perpetrated by China in the case of the “Two Michaels?”
Your points are absolutely correct! It’s all orchestrated by US. Canada helps US. .
👍👍👍
The world should stop using US dollars. Problem is solved.
The judge that judges righteously will have to take an early retirement.
she is proven innocent
This is a political issue rather than a legal one. If Meng Wanzhou is acquitted, Canada will be suspected of being close to China. Therefore, it has nothing to do with Meng Wanzhou, but has something to do with Canada.
She think she is untouched by using HK passport but she lose the bet, The Canadian still made the arrested per US requested. Good luck of getting out of this round get ready for the extradite and face US Court system.