good call on inviting her on the channel. Her ig reels r really helpful and honest because they are based on science and not opinions like a lot of influencers out there.
There are plenty of science based channel. At this point, if people still rely only on influencers, that's their choice. Speaking about, having a divergent opinion is pretty normal in academic studies. That's why you start trying something different. Sometime it appear to be true. And then it's confirmed. Sometime it happens once and is never confirmed. Sometime the studies prove the theory wrong. So in the end, having ONE guest is a good thing. But it still have to be peer reviewed. If you stick with a theory and only one expert, you may still be wrong. And time passing, new thing discovered, you may still be wrong in the future. Science truth is a complex thing :)
After 4 years I came to the conclusion that most fitness influencers are kinda full of shit nway. Sure some will give great tips for your form and what not (like you) but past that it not rocket science. 50% of the job is simply being constant.. 30% is your nutrition/sleep.. the other 20% would be your training routine. Thing is if you listen to many influencers it feel like they all ran out of content a decade ago and try to min/max stuff that 99% of peoples who workout dont even need to bother with (like... unless you do the first 80% properly.. min/ maxing how you do a certain exercices pretty much wont matter nway).
Answer this question...lets say i have an 8 hour feeding window each day...how many meals should i eat...3 or 4? I am 250lb 6' natural bodybuilder in my mid sixties..Also should i shoot for 240 grams of protein per day? I also heard and i know by experience i can digest 80 grams of protein per meal...but would it be best to have 4 meals at 60 grams of protein per meal or 3 meals at 80 grams?....of coarse with 4 meals i would have to eat every 2 hours and 3 meals every 2.7 hours...So which would get best results for average person? It seems everyone talks about how to train for best gains but no one explains best way to eat for optimal body recovery...which to me is 80% of the gains equation..😊
3 or 4. Comes down to preference. I personally would go for 3 in an 8 hour window because I would not feel like eating the fourth meal, and it would likely drop off occasionally. Smaller frequent meals has been touted as most optimal for numerous reasons. But sometimes most optimal can lead to most likely to fail, so it is a balancing act.
6 foot, 250lb bodybuilder in mid 60s though. Amazing, well done you I hope I'm doing the same. I'll never be 6' sadly, stopped growing when I was 15 and 5'7 😂
@@ryanhoulder8516 Unfortunately, this is wrong. Trained individuals can gain muscle in a calorie deficit Flexible vs. rigid dieting in resistance-trained individuals seeking to optimize their physiques: A randomized controlled trial Laurin Alexandra Conlin 1, Danielle Trina Aguilar 1, Gavin Elliot Rogers 1, Bill I Campbell 2 Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: A randomized controlled trial Grant M Tinsley 1, Jeffrey S Forsse 2, Natalie K Butler 2, Antonio Paoli 3, Annie A Bane 2, Paul M La Bounty 4, Grant B Morgan 5, Peter W Grandjean 2 And I can find more if you'd like
@@ryanhoulder8516 and just FYI if you don't aggressively diet then you can build even MORE muscle on a deficit WHILE being a trained lifter! God I love science :D
Yeah, no offense, but when it's interesting and surely is educational, you can't beat some Jeff/Menno powerpoint/multi peer reviewed named studies demonstration, with just an (interesting) testimony, "there are studies" and video clips. I admit I skipped a little, so I could be wrong. But just an honest feedback about the outcome and the state of competition :)
Treating soft sciences like hard sciences irritate me to no end. There are so many factors not being taken account for and 80% of the studies have statistical errors. Just the environment or the belief or the energy in the room can skew a result and besides that on an individual basis you are not going to get an accurate result. I say take all the advise or fad scientific study and try them out and see if it works for you.
Ok ngl I didn’t like the way she ended… it’s almost like she’s saying all of the studying and research she has done is pointless all you need to know is train hard sleep well and eat a good diet 😂
@RelentlessForever999 Well, it kind of is... Almost everything works, whether it's Yates-, Coleman-, Schwarzenegger-, Shrieve-, Cutler-, Wheeler-, Heath-, or whatever style imaginable... It has to be demanding, and nutrition and sleep need to enhance recovery... 🤷♂️ The rest is just nuance and preference 😅
I dont really get the thumbnail here... these content creators that you chose are saying all very similar things and are pretty much agreeing on most of the evidence based facts.
@@maxl.5297 but that is factual tho. Stretch promotes more growth because that is the position where most of the sarcomeres are under tension. And they didn't say ignore full range of motion all together, they just said that the emphasis of your lifts should focus more on the stretch where there is more tension than the peak contraction where the tension is minimal.
You don't need a degree to know that pressing on the gas pedal will move any civilian vehicle. But there are people out there that study, find out, research on the how and the why. Brother. She and many other exercise scientists of whatever they're called are just super curious about the why and the how. And they share their research. Elite level athletes train differently than 30 yrs ago. Quit being a snob
You don't need any professional to do something and get results......everyone knows poison kills and medicine cures. That is not the idea of science based lifting. You are an idiot if you think life is all about "you apply X and then you get Y" that is where ignorance comes from. Ignorance when it comes to health and fitness will cost you many things. Slower progress, mental fragility, over fatigue, health problems, injury and in some cases possibly death. There are always some new things to learn but you are not going to get any of those things with that amount of arrogance. Defeat your ego and stop being such a douche.
I've watched all of her interviews with Kurt Havens, Paul , Todd Lee, etc and she speaks in generalities and never gets into specifics. Super strange as you don't really know if she knows as must as she thinks.
I don’t speak in specifics because most people don’t understand.. how insulin is transphosphorylated which phosphorylates insulin receptor substrate 1 which interacts with the p85 subunit which interacts with p110, activating the pi3k which phosphorylates a minor phospholipid called pip-2 converting it to pip3 which phosphorylates pdk1 which phosphorylates akt that is also phosphorylated by mtorc2 which phosphorylates as160, which binds glut4 vesicles, once phosphorylated, as160 is released allowing glut4 channels to be transported to the cell membrane to allow glucose transport (glucose uptake) For a muscle contraction, a signal is sent from the motor cortex to the spinal cord, depolarizing a motor neuron to release acetylcholine, once acetylcholine stimulates a given motor end plate, this depolarizes the sarcolemma, triggering calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, calcium binds to troponin, displacing tropomyosin, allowing myosin to bind to actin (thin filament) allowing for a muscle contraction. Muscle growth occurs when pulling tension (mechanical tension) pulls the nucleus causing nuclear flattening, opening the pores of the nucleus, allowing yap/taz transcriptional coactivators to enter the nucleus and activate transcription of growth factors in mesechymal progenitors, this stimulates specialized muscle stem cells called satellite cells to proliferate with low myod expression which stimulates satellite cells to integrate into existing, loaded muscle cells to increase the size of the muscle. Conversely, when a muscle cell is pulled to rupture or is overloaded with calcium, the cell will lyse and the remains of the dead cell are cleaned up by inflammatory macrophages; through the injury process specialized muscle stem cells are triggered to proliferate with high myod expression which triggers satellite cells to differentiate into a whole new muscle cell Myod is a differentiation transcription factor Ok I ran out of time I have to go to class but you’re wrong. Listen harder :)
The amount of intelligent people I've been able to sit down and talk to over the 20 years of coaching, be it athletics or personal training, I can tell you she's at the top. Don't let age fool you, brother. be open to learning from anyone, no matter the age
@@dilbophagginzthose people also are experts in their fields. I say understand the basic science and believe the idea that makes the most sense. I have been following Mike for so long and there has never been an instance where he gave a claim without having a solid reasoning and I can tell you that if this young lady and Mike were to have an intelligent conversation they will come to an agreement on basically any topic of their field because there is only one science.
good call on inviting her on the channel. Her ig reels r really helpful and honest because they are based on science and not opinions like a lot of influencers out there.
Agreed 💯💯💯
There are plenty of science based channel. At this point, if people still rely only on influencers, that's their choice.
Speaking about, having a divergent opinion is pretty normal in academic studies. That's why you start trying something different.
Sometime it appear to be true. And then it's confirmed.
Sometime it happens once and is never confirmed.
Sometime the studies prove the theory wrong.
So in the end, having ONE guest is a good thing. But it still have to be peer reviewed. If you stick with a theory and only one expert, you may still be wrong. And time passing, new thing discovered, you may still be wrong in the future.
Science truth is a complex thing :)
I really like this type of video. I learned alot.
Thank you
Yesss I've been following her for a while on IG and she's amazing!
When confused. Do what john meadow's said.
GOAT.
Funny thing is... even if he can't update his videos, he's right more often than not in the light of newer findings 😂
GO BLUE!! Awesome video Jonni .
Loved this 💪🏼
After 4 years I came to the conclusion that most fitness influencers are kinda full of shit nway. Sure some will give great tips for your form and what not (like you) but past that it not rocket science. 50% of the job is simply being constant.. 30% is your nutrition/sleep.. the other 20% would be your training routine. Thing is if you listen to many influencers it feel like they all ran out of content a decade ago and try to min/max stuff that 99% of peoples who workout dont even need to bother with (like... unless you do the first 80% properly.. min/ maxing how you do a certain exercices pretty much wont matter nway).
Trust myself
When turk video ready?
Answer this question...lets say i have an 8 hour feeding window each day...how many meals should i eat...3 or 4? I am 250lb 6' natural bodybuilder in my mid sixties..Also should i shoot for 240 grams of protein per day? I also heard and i know by experience i can digest 80 grams of protein per meal...but would it be best to have 4 meals at 60 grams of protein per meal or 3 meals at 80 grams?....of coarse with 4 meals i would have to eat every 2 hours and 3 meals every 2.7 hours...So which would get best results for average person? It seems everyone talks about how to train for best gains but no one explains best way to eat for optimal body recovery...which to me is 80% of the gains equation..😊
3 or 4. Comes down to preference. I personally would go for 3 in an 8 hour window because I would not feel like eating the fourth meal, and it would likely drop off occasionally. Smaller frequent meals has been touted as most optimal for numerous reasons. But sometimes most optimal can lead to most likely to fail, so it is a balancing act.
6 foot, 250lb bodybuilder in mid 60s though. Amazing, well done you I hope I'm doing the same. I'll never be 6' sadly, stopped growing when I was 15 and 5'7 😂
4:25 are you jeff nippard or mike van wyck?
Jeff
If you train more intense you must be on point with nutrition as well as not over train if you want optimal gains...
Is that the influencer that said that muscle gain doesn't depend on energy? 🤔
@@gianrossa1673 muscle growth is so slow that the energy adjustment you need is very minimal
it doesn't. it depends on training. There's a minimal energy requirement and youre good
But if your not in a surplus then you wont build muscle? ( outside of newbies gains )
Something isnt adding up here.
@@ryanhoulder8516 Unfortunately, this is wrong.
Trained individuals can gain muscle in a calorie deficit
Flexible vs. rigid dieting in resistance-trained individuals seeking to optimize their physiques: A randomized controlled trial
Laurin Alexandra Conlin 1, Danielle Trina Aguilar 1, Gavin Elliot Rogers 1, Bill I Campbell 2
Time-restricted feeding in young men performing resistance training: A randomized controlled trial
Grant M Tinsley 1, Jeffrey S Forsse 2, Natalie K Butler 2, Antonio Paoli 3, Annie A Bane 2, Paul M La Bounty 4, Grant B Morgan 5, Peter W Grandjean 2
And I can find more if you'd like
@@ryanhoulder8516 and just FYI if you don't aggressively diet then you can build even MORE muscle on a deficit WHILE being a trained lifter! God I love science :D
@scientificsnitch
I'd like to know what a "reasonable body fat percentage" is...
Athletes: 6-13%
Fit Individuals: 14-17%
Average: 18-24%
Overweight: 25% and above
Just down 4 Reese's cups while watching the first 2 minutes of this.
Yeah, no offense, but when it's interesting and surely is educational, you can't beat some Jeff/Menno powerpoint/multi peer reviewed named studies demonstration, with just an (interesting) testimony, "there are studies" and video clips.
I admit I skipped a little, so I could be wrong.
But just an honest feedback about the outcome and the state of competition :)
Treating soft sciences like hard sciences irritate me to no end. There are so many factors not being taken account for and 80% of the studies have statistical errors. Just the environment or the belief or the energy in the room can skew a result and besides that on an individual basis you are not going to get an accurate result. I say take all the advise or fad scientific study and try them out and see if it works for you.
@@scott-hr3hd love this comment!!!
I prefer bro science
Ok ngl I didn’t like the way she ended… it’s almost like she’s saying all of the studying and research she has done is pointless all you need to know is train hard sleep well and eat a good diet 😂
Because Effort, sleep, nutrition are 95% of it
@RelentlessForever999
Well, it kind of is...
Almost everything works, whether it's Yates-, Coleman-, Schwarzenegger-, Shrieve-, Cutler-, Wheeler-, Heath-, or whatever style imaginable...
It has to be demanding, and nutrition and sleep need to enhance recovery... 🤷♂️
The rest is just nuance and preference 😅
@@Grumpyoldman666 because genetics, genes, and chromosomes make up 85% and everything else is the last 15%**
90% is just showing up
I dont really get the thumbnail here... these content creators that you chose are saying all very similar things and are pretty much agreeing on most of the evidence based facts.
I disagree with Milo, Jeff and Dr Mike on a lot of things
@@Scientificsnitchlike what?
@@enoch727
Like from minute 14 on...?
On lengthened partials/stretch mediated hypertrophy?
@@maxl.5297 but that is factual tho. Stretch promotes more growth because that is the position where most of the sarcomeres are under tension. And they didn't say ignore full range of motion all together, they just said that the emphasis of your lifts should focus more on the stretch where there is more tension than the peak contraction where the tension is minimal.
You don’t need a degree to be able to know how to workout and to grow your body😂 people are so gullible
You don't need a degree to know that pressing on the gas pedal will move any civilian vehicle.
But there are people out there that study, find out, research on the how and the why.
Brother. She and many other exercise scientists of whatever they're called are just super curious about the why and the how. And they share their research.
Elite level athletes train differently than 30 yrs ago.
Quit being a snob
You don't need any professional to do something and get results......everyone knows poison kills and medicine cures. That is not the idea of science based lifting. You are an idiot if you think life is all about "you apply X and then you get Y" that is where ignorance comes from.
Ignorance when it comes to health and fitness will cost you many things. Slower progress, mental fragility, over fatigue, health problems, injury and in some cases possibly death.
There are always some new things to learn but you are not going to get any of those things with that amount of arrogance. Defeat your ego and stop being such a douche.
I've watched all of her interviews with Kurt Havens, Paul , Todd Lee, etc and she speaks in generalities and never gets into specifics. Super strange as you don't really know if she knows as must as she thinks.
I don’t speak in specifics because most people don’t understand.. how insulin is transphosphorylated which phosphorylates insulin receptor substrate 1 which interacts with the p85 subunit which interacts with p110, activating the pi3k which phosphorylates a minor phospholipid called pip-2 converting it to pip3 which phosphorylates pdk1 which phosphorylates akt that is also phosphorylated by mtorc2 which phosphorylates as160, which binds glut4 vesicles, once phosphorylated, as160 is released allowing glut4 channels to be transported to the cell membrane to allow glucose transport (glucose uptake)
For a muscle contraction, a signal is sent from the motor cortex to the spinal cord, depolarizing a motor neuron to release acetylcholine, once acetylcholine stimulates a given motor end plate, this depolarizes the sarcolemma, triggering calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, calcium binds to troponin, displacing tropomyosin, allowing myosin to bind to actin (thin filament) allowing for a muscle contraction.
Muscle growth occurs when pulling tension (mechanical tension) pulls the nucleus causing nuclear flattening, opening the pores of the nucleus, allowing yap/taz transcriptional coactivators to enter the nucleus and activate transcription of growth factors in mesechymal progenitors, this stimulates specialized muscle stem cells called satellite cells to proliferate with low myod expression which stimulates satellite cells to integrate into existing, loaded muscle cells to increase the size of the muscle. Conversely, when a muscle cell is pulled to rupture or is overloaded with calcium, the cell will lyse and the remains of the dead cell are cleaned up by inflammatory macrophages; through the injury process specialized muscle stem cells are triggered to proliferate with high myod expression which triggers satellite cells to differentiate into a whole new muscle cell
Myod is a differentiation transcription factor
Ok I ran out of time I have to go to class but you’re wrong. Listen harder :)
The amount of intelligent people I've been able to sit down and talk to over the 20 years of coaching, be it athletics or personal training, I can tell you she's at the top. Don't let age fool you, brother. be open to learning from anyone, no matter the age
I want to know if jimmy understood that? Lol
@@Scientificsnitch best. Mic drop. Ever 😊
Thanks a lot Jimmy, I hope you're as confused as me! Bring back generalisations!
I will obviously trust the 50kg teenager
Comments like that and you might need to trust younger. Don't be so ignorant.
I'd unironically listen to her over Mike and Milo
@@dilbophagginzAgreed! 💯💯💯
@@juerfe ah yes. A 5’3 female should be 200 lbs lean before you trust her…what terrible logic…
@@dilbophagginzthose people also are experts in their fields. I say understand the basic science and believe the idea that makes the most sense. I have been following Mike for so long and there has never been an instance where he gave a claim without having a solid reasoning and I can tell you that if this young lady and Mike were to have an intelligent conversation they will come to an agreement on basically any topic of their field because there is only one science.