damn its not as simple as it looks coz the sentence above is wrong so that means its not simple at least i solved one thing someone else can solve the rest i cant waste all day
If you were to create the time machine with one of your close friends with them knowing most of what to do and have them go through and kill your grandfather you wouldn't run into this problem
If everything in that video was a lie, so the statement "everything was a lie" isn't true either. That means everything in that video was true and it was sponsored by brilliant
@@user-kt5qd2fj3k this is the task that cannot be solved: "This is a lie". It cannot be confirmed or disproved. There was even a guy whose name I do not remember who thought about it and found that there are sentences that cannot be disprove or confirm. Overall, this is also a paradox, and this is probably what the author of the film meant - to include a paradox in the title.
Dude I’m scared, confused, mad, sad, happy, and completely disoriented from this video. But also props to the camera man for trying the time travel thing and making these videos in the video
If your life flashes before your eyes at the moment of death, it is possible that you have been dead for the last 600 trillion years and are just reliving an endless loop.
But memory isn't completely reliable, so if this were true it could explain instances of deja vu and could also possibility explain the mandella effect
@@Sealedservant no it does happen during the day, what I’m saying is I believe deja vu is just our dreams that we forgot and randomly remember because we forget %90 of our dreams but idk just a theory.
@@SLITHERIS well sorry but I have to debunk it. I get a dejavu of a lot of things I do during the day that I never really dream about and I remember my dreams more than the average person.
@@Sealedservant bro he's assuming that deja vu occurs when we have a dream and forget about it,and something we do triggers us to remember the forgotten dream,in part at least,anyway,my point is,if you forget about your dreams,how can you recall that you didn't forget about it in the first place
I usually only get dejavu in familiar places, with things I know that I’ve done before, and if not then the places I visit that give me dejavu are places that are similar to other places that I go to. If it’s not just a glitch in the human brain, then we are blissfully ignorant and shouldn’t worry about it anyway.
I love the Doctor Who explanation for paradoxes: -"When a paradox is created, time simply erase both sides of the paradox. Resumedly, neither of you or your younger parents existed and so, no one will ever know you even came to be something in a forgotten timeline, apart from this universe."
Yeah and even if you haven't, we know the light turns off because you can literally just put your phone on record and put it in there and then close the door and boom, now ya know
@@bandito_801 thank you I agree this person is extremely scientifically illiterate to be talking about this subject.I feel sorry for the people being misinformed by these ‘deep videos’ they need to look at real science and not this malarkey
There is a kdrama that's called the Myth of Sisyphus. Writers put an ending on it but the story, as well as the ending, is a paradox. Butterfly effect and déjà vu are some of the things that makes me think we're only on a never ending loop.
yeah imagine hitler never lived many people wouldnt die in the war and yyour grandma/ your grandfather would have another girl/boyfriend so you wouldnt live!
@@LaserKatze Your predetermined to incarcerate here from your last life weather you believe that or not so it would still be you born but it would be in a different body.
The video is titeled incorrectly, this is a shower thoughts video but somehow i think that's the point of the title that states a lie wich is a lie wich was the point of the title, got it? lol
@@adamhelberg9228 tho that sounds cool, you don't really need to drill a hole. Just slooowly close the door and you'll see the door pressing on the button when it's almost closed. And then you can just check the button on your own, with a finger or something while the door is open.
Life's just hard man... I hope when i die, i would at least be reincarnated.. i just want to live.. i want to kee my memories.. not lost them.. but- wait- someone's- i feel like someone's watching me. I don't know what to do. Help. He-
@@MushroomManC join astral projection community or reddit and discord. So you can remember your past life. Or if you want to do astral projection intentionally. Practice meditation in Buddhist
The bootstrap paradox always infuriates me. Other paradoxes are either offered as obvious situational oxymorons - or as riddles to be thought through. But people take the bootstrap paradox - a hypothetical situation that can't be traced back to any point of origin - and just go "wouldn't that be weird?" As if it's not even ten times more nonsensical to conceive of a situation that - by definition - happens for no reason.
i think the solution for the bootstrap paradox is that someone else or the same boy wrote that book then found a time machine and went back in time to publish that book in the name of william shakespear, then their future self loved william shakespear and found the time machine, went back in time and published the book, and it goes full cycle
@@betagamp no, the real answer is just this wouldn’t happen ever. It’s like saying a Giant ant knocks in your door. But ants aren’t giant, and they can’t knock on doors. So this situation is a paradox! The ant paradox! That’s what the bootstrap paradox is like, essentially.
If colour blind people can see the true color of life then that means they can see colors and if they can see colors they are not color blind 🤔🤔 ...... think about it
You might disappear because then he would’ve never adopted you, and you could’ve ended up being killed, or left somewhere, or get parents that are murderers.... you never know.
I get déjà vu all the time and it terrifies me cause I get it at the most random things, a movie I’ve never seen before, a conversation with strangers I’ve never meet, all sorts of stuff. I’m telling you, I’m a time traveler
what I've heard is that it's a phenomenon where the memory of the moment stores in the brain before the processing of the moment has finished, which causes the brain to think it's experienced that exact moment before!
That is like saying: 'Am I still me if every cell in my body is replaced, am I still the same person?'. The reactions that I made may be different than me with my old cells because of different chemical reactions in the brain, but my cells are replaced at a different time, not all at once, right (especially when I am/growing or changing size, because I need more or less cells to sustain my life) so what changes at a different time? Did that make any sense?
The only thing keeping us original is our consciousness. No one would know of anyone was suddenly replaced with a clone but themselves. Only the original person knows.
But are you really original if they took original part from your body (say a finger) to make the clone and the part that were taken were replaced by an artificial part? Neither you nor the clone would be original because both you and the clone were modified to create something whole
@@kingyg6489 Excellent point actually. However, you still create your own experiences through your thoughts and actions. So while your body parts may not be original, your thoughts still are. But if you took like a couple brain cells and made a clone, no one would know.
@@frostyfrostbite406 you must be quite smart. The human brain has ~3 petabytes of storage. If you have that all filled with information and not capable of consuming more information, you're quite smart. Edit: that just happened to me. Holy shit 2nd edit: goddamn it. I was supposed to sleep tonight.
My problem with the fridge light and tree in the forest questions is that there is actually a correct answer to it, based on physics and logic and stuff. For the fridge light, there is a switch, that when pressed, turns off the light, which is placed so that when the door is closed, it presses the switch. And for the tree in the forest, yes, it makes a sound, because that’s how physics works. (Also that question overlooks the fact that humans aren’t the only living things that can hear)
But there's new quantum physics studies states different... It was a study done on the wave or particle nature of a molecule ... I'm not sure if you have heard about it . But it basically ended with the conclusion that that molecule formed itself as particle when there were observers and when there were no observers that was just simply waves and that is not even visible...
@@shinihahaha4142 Oh of course! Quantum physics and all that are a completely different thing and really cool. And the whole Schrödinger’s Cat thing, as mentioned in the video, is really interesting. I just really dislike the fridge light and tree falling in the forest questions in particular, because _those_ are stupid.
@@TheOverArchiver Quite actually they are kind of... The fridge thing really sounds stupidest tho as well as the tree thing.. maybe they are viewing it from different point of view that seems amusing to them ... I really don't know 😅 .
I've been a woodcutter for 50 years, and this old axe has been my constant companion. I've replaced the shaft 7 times, and it's currently on its fourth head, and if ever I had to get another, I'd get one of the same type.
My favorite concept of time travel is the simplest one. One linear timeline. Everything a time traveller does in the past has already been done. There is no changing anything that is, because obviously nobody did. Or it would already be done. You can conceive killing your grandfather. But obviously you never will, because you are still here. It's the simplest and I think the best form of time travel. Not many paradoxes to consider, and easily understood and explained. The one downside is that it can be hard to tell a story with it. As it's hard to craft surprises and challenges for the characters. A good one however, is the book series "Off to be the Wizard".
Yes, this is my favorite too. I think this is how it was done in the third harry Potter book. They went back, but everything technically already happened the first time, they just didn't know. Harry even sees himself across the lake but assumes it's his father the first time around. I always loved that book due to how neatly the time travel wrapped up the story.
If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a liebut then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie. 🤯
@@MisterPink. The Theseus ship one is a much older version of the cruise ship one that existed since the legend of Theseus, with a wooden ship. This comment is talking about the paradox after it, which is the same concept applied to the ever changing human body.
"Everything in this video is a lie" THEN THAT SENTENCE IS ALSO A LIE MEANING, NOT EVERYTHING IN THIS VIDEO IS A LIE, NOW YOU CAN DECIDE WHICH IS A LIE, AND WHICH IS NOT
It's both since if the vid is a lie that's a lie making atleast a part of it true but u can still say that's a lie and the rest of the vid is true they give only 2 options when there should be more
One of my favorite solutions to the heap of sand problem is measuring how likely it is to be a heap of sand based on the quantity, not if it is or isn't.
Logical error. If everything in this video is a lie, including that statement, it does not automatically make everything in the video true, it only negates the idea that it's all a lie. The statement itself can be a lie and leave the rest of the video as truthful.
Referring to Aristotle's logic - "Everything in this video is a lie." when negated becomes "Not everything in this video is a lie" which in turn equates to "There is a single truthful statement in the video". However, such an approach implies that the video is not homogenous but rather a totality of independent propositions and thus avoids the Liar Paradox. However, it does not resolve it. The idea of the Liar Paradox manifests itself when deliberating on the truth value of an utterance as a whole (i.e. in our case, when taking into account the idea of logical conjunction where "A and B is true" only when "A is true" and "B is true"). Therefore in a complex statement of the type: "A and B and C and ... " a false singular statement makes the whole conjunction false as well. One of the ways to solve the Liar Paradox is then, again, similar to your idea - adverting to fuzzy logic (where the things can be partially truthful). There are of course other interesting solutions as well - you may try looking up Alfred Tarski's theory on metalanguages and Saul Kripke's subsequent criticism, as well as Kripke's views on ungrounded statements. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/
@@alexsavova8940 The statement "not everything in this video is a lie" does not simply equate to "there is a single truthful statement in the video." It also equates to "there are several truthful statements in this video," "all but one statement in this video is true," "most statements in this video are true," "a few statements in this video are true," and so on. I don't think that my comment needed to become this complicated, honestly. I only pointed out that the negation did not mean the entire video was truthful, only that it wasn't all lies, that the things said in it still may or may not be true and let it stand as that. I wasn't trying to resolve a liars paradox, just point out an error in logic. I don't really see how the logic is fuzzy. I think the logic is pretty clear, but I can see how it might make the ability to figure something out a little more complicated as is the case in things being partially truthful, so maybe you can say the logic makes the problem fuzzy, but not the logic. To me, fuzzy would refer to something being difficult to separate, difficult to determine, hard to see, but the logic I proposed was pretty simple. In actuality, the idea of a paradox is pretty fuzzy as paradoxes usually only manifest when something is not fully understood and logic is usually necessary to clear it up. I do appreciate the links, though, and I'm sure others who may stumble across your comment will appreciate them as well.
@@genostellar Probably, I didn't say it very clear - I meant "There is *at least* one truthful statement" (which I didn't clarify). Speaking of the "fuzzy logic" - I meant the theory of fuzzy logic (where truth can accept all values between 0 and 1). It is used primarily in Informatics. I'm not saying your logic is fuzzy (or flawed). Conversely, I liked what you said - I found it interesting and original. :)
That's the paradox. Say a true statement is said to be false, including the statement that says it's false. Since the statement stating that the statement is false, includes itself, wouldn't that mean the statement stating the statement is false, be false? But if the statement stating that the statement is false, is false, wouldn't that mean the statement is true? (You have no idea how long it took me to write this)
As a child I always thought about something I came up with myself: “do I know everything? I don’t know. But that means I don’t know everything because I don’t know if I know everything. But now I know that I don’t know everything so the argument that I don’t know if I know everything is irrelevant so I again don’t know if I know everything.”
I had kind of the same thing. One day I thought: "is there anything we can know 100% for sure? I mean I'd say something like 'I know this table is made out of wood' but what if that's somehow just some kind of an illusion?" and then the next day I thought "there is one thing that I can know for sure, and it's that there's nothing I can know for sure. But if that's the case, then it means that there is something I know for sure, so not everything is unsure, but that would mean that I don't know for sure that I can't know anything for sure" so yeah think about that. Since then I've found a couple more things that you can know for sure either way, things like "I think so I exist", or "I'm 100% sure that whatever an apple is in my thoughts, even if it doesn't physically exist, tastes good in my opinion".
The statement, "this entire video was a lie" is either true or false. But just because the statement is false does not prove that the inverse must be true. Everything said up to that point in the video could be true and the statement would still be false.
But couldn’t it also be both true and false? Since the title is describing the video, since the video itself is true then the statement “this entire video is a lie” is a lie. And since the title is part of the video, it confirms itself while also establishing that its ultimately false. This makes it a paradox, which is the entire point of the video
you also can excape the paradox because he said 'a lie' and not '''false', because wether something is a lie or not only depends on the belief of the person who says it. but that's not interesting...
This video is basically describing itself thus making it autological. The video ends in a loop but since it's a loop that meant it never ended in the first place which makes it so it is repeating its own statements but has different views to all of them. This means the video is neither a lie nor the truth , if it was a lie than the statement would be true but if the statement is a lie then the video is true , see none of it actually existed in the first place , rather it was just a trick played by our minds which think in a way in which we cannot absorb all of the knowledge. People say the world is running on the word "logic" but does logic really come in this point . Even the word logic isn't logically correct as In logic, an argument can be invalid even if its conclusion is true, and an argument can be valid even if its conclusion is false. ... All of the premises are true, and so is the conclusion, but it's not a valid argument. So if we really look into it We don't know that logic is true. In an abstract sense, we know that it's valid by confirming it with an argument. Truth is some satisfactory correlation between the conclusion and reality. If that's what you're asking about then the answer is the same for almost everything people are generally concerned with.
@@Theraot the title was mentioned in the video itself. Something I found out after watching the entire thing. Thus it is part of the video, as he himself has confirmed the very same paradox I just described
“The Ship of Theseus is an artifact in a museum. Over time, its planks of wood rot and are replaced with new planks. When no original plank remains is it still the Ship of Theseus?” - Vision.
There are two possibilities: A: Let's say the planks were changes periodically. Like, out of a 100 total planks, 10 were changed once, a year later, 10 more were changed and so on until all 100 planks were changed. Now when the first ten were changed, the 90 old and 10 new planks became original. Like a drop of water in ink would make that drop pigmented as well. Thus, if the planks are changed gradually, the ship is still the original. B. The planks are changed all at once, than it is no longer the original ship because if the ink drop is taken away and only the water is added, the water does not become pigmented. But then again, it's pretty unrealistic for all planks to be changed at the same instant.
I thought of the grandfather paradox myself after I went to some TED talk and I told my friends, I thought I was some kind of absolute fucking genius until I got home, asked reddit just for someone to point out this already exists. Goodbye ego 😂
@@antarctica0061 but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?That is a theory but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?.that is a theory but it was already made.
Regarding the time travel paradox: I would like to start with reminding everyone that "negative", by itself, doesn't exist in the universe. It is, mainly, just a matter of direction. That is going back in time implies negative time which isn't possible. I mean can you go back in space? Is there negative space? Why would there be negative time? Going back in time means going back in time dimension, not direction. This is the first misconception. You can go back in space direction, not dimension. Secondly, if we were to bypass all these first-level logic barriers to reach our paradox, my party-ruining ass would still interfere saying that I really believe that going back in time IS the paradox before you even need to do anything. Being in your own past as the "future you" means that you have always been there and you should be older than you are, thus creating this loop of paradoxes. However, if you were there as another replica of your future self, then killing your grandfather will not harm you since you are from a separate timeline.
but you wouldn't be older. If you went back in time when you are 50, you would still be 50 when you arrive. Perhaps die around 80, then some time later, you're born... again. But just as you have always been. And then you will grow up to time travel when you are 50... again. Its a loop. You will die from your perspective at 80, and will die at 80 from others perspective, but will cease to exist in a future where you grow older than 50 without time traveling.
@@vjexmixv yes but this scenario implies going to a separate timeline... so killing your grandfather won't affect you... going with the same timeline immediately creates an age paradox
@@faisaldeeb6479 no; the paradox is fixed if a new timeline is created: who killed the grandfather? You from another timeline. The new timeline’s you is dead, but the time traveling, old timeline you lives on. Rather, the paradox comes in the self fulfilling time travel system, famously represented in Harry Potter, where the events in the future cause the causes of the future events in the past, or vice versa with events and causes, because they are really both causes, and both events/effects.Like how harry saves his past self. In the same timeline. Only fulfilling the events of the past and future.
@@zmansadventures No, they don't take up negative space. They just have an opposite charge. They still exist as things taking up space with a positive size, albeit a very small size.
This guy has to start a podcast or just upload his videos to spotify I promise I'll spend so long listening to them bc his voice it the most soothing voice I've ever heard, and he has interesting videos
I had a deja vu today..... But the thing was, everything happened EXACTLY the same way with EXACTLY the same people... Like I'm sure it was not a coincidence
if it was an interaction with people, it could've been more of a prediction by your brain. it saw how those people were acting and subconciously figured out what they were most likely to say. our brains our INCREDIBLY smart and can predict things like that, it's just mostly done in the subconcious and rarely effects our day-to-day life. that's what deja vu usually is; our brains subconciously decoding the future, and then being satisfied when it's currect. if it was more preminition style then deja-vu, then your actions may easily have been subconsiously affected by it as well.
I have a somewhat answer to the ship paradox. when we add a new part to the ship, it becomes a part of the ship and the ship is whole again. now no matter what and how many parts are replaced it's still the same ship by this principle
Instructions unclear: made hitler meet dinosaurs to create a mind control device to make us live in a matrix where a few of us think that we live in a matrix
The "omnipotence paradox" is easy to solve. The answer to "can God create a rock so big he can't lift it" is "if he wants." God, having all power, can choose to limit himself. And if he chooses to limit himself, he can create a rock he can't lift. But only if that's what he chooses to do. He could also create the rock, and then choose to be able to lift it, right after not being able to. Pretty simple. It's up to God whether or not he can lift it. In fact, if you're talking about the Christian God, he came to earth as a man, therefore weak and unable to lift a lot of rocks. But he could have easily chosen to lift them if he wanted to.
I would also add one thing: how big does a rock need to be for God to not be able to lift it? If we're talking about an infinite being, the rock would need to be infinitely big. And then it isn't a rock anymore by definition. For it to be a "rock," it needs boundaries in physical space. So in summary, the question itself is paradoxical and makes no sense.
@@miyu1424 well there's two ways to break it down to my knowledge. You could say that, since God is infinite, the anvil would also have to be infinite, in which case it is no longer an anvil. The other way to look at it is that God could, at any time, flip a switch and decide to lift the anvil he previously decided to not to be able to lift. Omnipotence means that you have the power over *everything.* Including the laws of the universe and what is, and is not, and what can be, and what cannot be. So God can choose to limit himself, he can also unlimit himself again. Basically, if an omnipotent being exists, a paradox isn't allowed to exist. Because God can simply override any law; anything we deem impossible could happen at any time. So my original comment stands. The answer to the question is "if he wants."
There’s a video by minutephysics about it. After killing your grandfather, you are dead and can’t kill him. So he comes back to life and goes through the events of his life up to the point where you decide to kill him. It’s a loop.
@@spodreman7732 I'd agree that it's going to be a loop or just that the timeline stops at that exact moment. It's not like we would truly know the answer anyway.
See this is all because of Logic. Logic and time don't really get together. Logic is just a unit we made for our selves so we could understand things. But some things like these defy logic themselves. So that means we will truly never know the answer
8:40 This wasn't his argument, it was actually the exact opposite. His argument was against the argument that "things must be observed to be true." (The tree falling when nobody is there is an example) It was meant to be an ad absurdum argument. Essentially, he was saying that the cat could not be both alive and dead, so it must have a defined state, even if nobody was observing it. Very big simplification, but you can look into it yourself. The quote from Wikipedia: "This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935,[1] in a discussion with Albert Einstein,[2] to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics." Also, the measurement paradox is specifically related to problems where the only way to measure an attribute will itself change that attribute.
How to tell if the light in the fridge turns off when you close it: Start recording on your phone, put your phone in the fridge, and close the door. Then open it back up, stop recording, and watch the recording.
@@PastelLePanda that brings into question the existence of a lot of things that are very hard to just ignore, including the phone, the light, and it also brings conspiracy theories into question, cause i wouldn't believe footage of a phone is naturaly faked in such a specific way. I need sleep.
The craziest thing just happened to me Last Christmas around October I was driving home from work in my room walking around and my step sister gave me this painting but she drew it in Spanish so I couldn't even hear it and it was so loud that I went blind so I told her I needed some watermelon because seven is my favourite colour on God, then she got stuck over a table then she got pregnant with her frist kid for the third time and that's why you shoud treat others the way you wanna be treated
The title of this video is “This Video is A Lie” If this video is a lie then he’s lying about it being a lie which means its the truth but it can’t be the truth because it’s a lie so that was a lie.
if You'd go back in time, you'd just end up in empty space, where the earth was at that point, where our solar system was at that point, where the galaxy was at that time within the local group, where at that time the local group was within the cluster, where that was within the filaments of space.....you're travelling back in time, not the whole planet. The easier explanation is that time is movement through space, rather than existing as an actual thing. it's a man made conscious concept to help us understand the continuation of reality and movement of matter in space, which for us observers seems like "time". It's a tool, not an underlying law of physics. And this is being understood more and more as such in the last years in science.
Sometimes, in my mind, I see myself as two people, one is my adult self and the other is my child self, like the really young version of me. I'm the adult version, the child is still there but that isn't me anymore. He still lives there even though I barely recognize him, I share his memories but even that is very foggy and a lot of the memories are lost maybe forever. This is what life feels like for me nowadays.
The simplest paradox :
↓The sentence below is correct.
↑The sentence above is wrong.
rip imagine if this was top comment
This is gonna keep me up all night
damn its not as simple as it looks coz
the sentence above is wrong
so that means its not simple
at least i solved one thing
someone else can solve the rest i cant waste all day
"this is a lie"
What if both are incorrect.
This entire video could be summed up to/by “Well yes, but actually no”
but actually yes :)
Yesn't.
@@kilos5958 and sometimes no
Well yes, but actually no
Nes
If everything in this video is a lie that means time travel is easy to understand without any important effects
why are people like this
@@ayman023 no no, they are right
Genius
but 5hen the fact that the video would be a lie is a lie so its true but a lie
If you were to create the time machine with one of your close friends with them knowing most of what to do and have them go through and kill your grandfather you wouldn't run into this problem
Her: He's probably thinking about other girls.
This guy at 3:00 AM:
me at 2 am
You're thinking with the right head my friend. We're not all sexaholics, as some women believe.
@@jesseroggio7260 most women think men dont put out enough
"Now that begs the question"
*ad: HOW DO WE MAKE OUR DELICIOUS PASTA?*
Pie
Lucky, you got pasta. I got Ninjamas, and I’m definitely not 5 years old
@@adgeifc4398 I'm eating pie rn how'd you know
@@bridgetcaton2881 duno man my brain said pie
Hahahahahahahaha
This video is so high quality, you can take a screenshot any seconds and you will get a wallpaper
8:47
@@panda11648 masterpiece.
@@butter6095 yes
@@emodenki4982 best thing I’ve seen all day
What if I can only afford 144 🤣
"This Entire Video Is A Lie"
So, does that mean the video wasn't sponsored by brilliant?
brilliant!
If everything in that video was a lie, so the statement "everything was a lie" isn't true either. That means everything in that video was true and it was sponsored by brilliant
@@witheredrose110You're too smart to be left aliveeeee
@@user-kt5qd2fj3k this is the task that cannot be solved: "This is a lie". It cannot be confirmed or disproved. There was even a guy whose name I do not remember who thought about it and found that there are sentences that cannot be disprove or confirm. Overall, this is also a paradox, and this is probably what the author of the film meant - to include a paradox in the title.
Dude I’m scared, confused, mad, sad, happy, and completely disoriented from this video. But also props to the camera man for trying the time travel thing and making these videos in the video
He is a lie.
He is a truth
or is he even someone?
But what makes someone someone?
Ah yes bacon
him at the end of the video: "This video was sponsored by Brilliant."
me: or was it???
im shook by the ending
*vsauce theme intensifies*
It is sponsored, it's the saying that changes.
Hey Vsauce michael here
How fast can you run?
It said everything in this video is a lie IN THE VIDEO...
Ikr
“We never learn anything by asking questions, we only get answers that already existed”
- Aperture
Isn't that the definition of learning tho?
@@molrat it is, but I think he meant that the majority of us never truly learned anything “new” as in never before discovered or invented
@@MrBingo-rv4mk yh like for us to really learn we would have to discover something new
@@kristlecasey9506 Can you discover something new if it was already there?
@@goofy9827 someone's definition of new is subjective. It will be new to the person that's learning it but not new as a whole if that makes sense
My Mind: "THIS VIDEO IS A LIE"
Me: proceed to click on the video
Did the same thing. I must know these lies!
ikr
I don't see the point in this comment tbh
Just click it anyway 🤣
It didnt say '(not clickbait)' so I didn't think I could trust what was divulged in the title lol
I hate how I'm so obsessed with paradoxes that I'm never surprised with a new one that I didn't already know about
Duality
If your life flashes before your eyes at the moment of death, it is possible that you have been dead for the last 600 trillion years and are just reliving an endless loop.
Dude, I kinda feel blessed that there are people like you in the comment section. Thank you so much for your theory.👏🏻🥰
But memory isn't completely reliable, so if this were true it could explain instances of deja vu and could also possibility explain the mandella effect
@CutiePie Sadly, no.
@CutiePie yep
but then you're neither alive nor dead right? how can u say that you're dead
I really like hearing his voice no matter what he's talking about
yes its like he is sitting with you
Same
Date him
@@nokey6175 wont that make you A *Gay* ?
Lol why do so many people comment this
I’m still convinced that deja vu is just the dreams we have at night and forget in the morning.
Dejavu doesn’t occurs for you during the day? I get dejavu several times a week at any time
@@Sealedservant no it does happen during the day, what I’m saying is I believe deja vu is just our dreams that we forgot and randomly remember because we forget %90 of our dreams but idk just a theory.
@@SLITHERIS well sorry but I have to debunk it. I get a dejavu of a lot of things I do during the day that I never really dream about and I remember my dreams more than the average person.
@@Sealedservant bro he's assuming that deja vu occurs when we have a dream and forget about it,and something we do triggers us to remember the forgotten dream,in part at least,anyway,my point is,if you forget about your dreams,how can you recall that you didn't forget about it in the first place
I usually only get dejavu in familiar places, with things I know that I’ve done before, and if not then the places I visit that give me dejavu are places that are similar to other places that I go to. If it’s not just a glitch in the human brain, then we are blissfully ignorant and shouldn’t worry about it anyway.
I love the Doctor Who explanation for paradoxes:
-"When a paradox is created, time simply erase both sides of the paradox. Resumedly, neither of you or your younger parents existed and so, no one will ever know you even came to be something in a forgotten timeline, apart from this universe."
That's fun, but it's not based in any science. - a fellow Whovian
@@pance_9912 spoilers
@@pance_9912 Ignoring Occam's Razor, this statement can't be proved wrong nor correct though, so it kinda fits the theme of the video.
What episode / story is that from? I don't remember this
@@Branogeni Pretty sure its from The Angels Take Manhattan, but I could be wrong.
"How do u know the light of fridge is off if u have never seen it"
Every kid has tried to seen it and when they saw it , it was VERY anti climatic
Yeah and even if you haven't, we know the light turns off because you can literally just put your phone on record and put it in there and then close the door and boom, now ya know
top of the fridge touches the button that triggers the light of fridge at an angle
lol guess i wasn't the only one
when the power went out i saw the fridge w/out the light on...
I did watched the lights getting off, it's hard to achieve that shit
Alternate title:
Shower Thoughts: Paradox Edition
Underrated comment🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yes that's kind of the red line through this whole video, however this video title is just a good example of a paradox so he had to do it.
The people who disliked are the people who don’t like that they were lied to by an entire video, and yet weren’t.
Proud to do
Efaga
Or were they?
I didn't like the scientific inaccuracies
@@bandito_801 thank you I agree this person is extremely scientifically illiterate to be talking about this subject.I feel sorry for the people being misinformed by these ‘deep videos’ they need to look at real science and not this malarkey
There is a kdrama that's called the Myth of Sisyphus. Writers put an ending on it but the story, as well as the ending, is a paradox.
Butterfly effect and déjà vu are some of the things that makes me think we're only on a never ending loop.
I've been having more and more deja vu recently to the point where it almost feels like I'm reliving the same 1yr. Gonna check out that K drama Mochii
The simplest paradox -“this sentence is a lie”
Ooooooooof 🤯
"I tell you truthfully that all I say are lies"
That sentence doesn't hold a boolean value
bro i was about to comment thids
How is that. Aparadox
His voice is so smooth that even the auto-generated subtitles aren't wrong.
Edit: Damn, look at those 750+ likes.
Damn
Damn
Damn
Damn
damn
Someone: *kills grandfather through time machine*
Reality: *casuly breaks*
@@urskunked Yes that's how I think time travel works too but is there any proof?
yeah
imagine hitler never lived
many people wouldnt die in the war and yyour grandma/ your grandfather would have another girl/boyfriend
so you wouldnt live!
@@LaserKatze Your predetermined to incarcerate here from your last life weather you believe that or not so it would still be you born but it would be in a different body.
Noname ! most of time travel stuff is teorícal and if you belive in multiple worlds then that is how it may work
@@urskunked no shit but if you have done an action you wont get back to your original tieline anymore
i want this man's voice as a podcast
This video isn’t a lie, it’s just a way for Aperture to tell everyone that Santa isn’t real.
The video is titeled incorrectly, this is a shower thoughts video but somehow i think that's the point of the title that states a lie wich is a lie wich was the point of the title, got it? lol
@@loganwolv3393 Sure..... I got it.....
@@loganwolv3393 For sure...
He’s real alright
I
7:48 when you mostly close the fridge door but it's still cracked you can see the light flick off, at least for my fridge
For my fridge too!
There is also a button that you can press
@@w8754 you cant know if the door actually press on it without drilling a hole through the door to see
Quantum physics fuck ye
@@adamhelberg9228 tho that sounds cool, you don't really need to drill a hole. Just slooowly close the door and you'll see the door pressing on the button when it's almost closed. And then you can just check the button on your own, with a finger or something while the door is open.
yes same
Paradoxes in a nutshell
OwO
Ladaladkdkdkd
nutshells in a paradox
lmao
Yes
This video is kind of a sum of all the surface level stuff you've been told to help further your understanding of how crazy reality can be.
That’s probably the funniest thing alive heard aperture say,:
“An old fat guy flew around the world delivering presents down peoples chimneys”
Sounds like a UB for me
Yeah I believed in that fat guy for most part of my life.
Legend has it, I still kind of do...
Or at least wish he was real.
I was never taught that... my parents never told me about Santa no matter how much one of my grandmothers wanted them to.
The title has to be “Everything in the video is True” if EVERYTHING is a lie
@Edit Error welp this is getting confusing let's make a paradox out of it
After a philosophy talk whole night, you still need the money to buy breakfast.
What's so special?
Life's just hard man... I hope when i die, i would at least be reincarnated.. i just want to live.. i want to kee my memories.. not lost them.. but- wait- someone's- i feel like someone's watching me. I don't know what to do. Help. He-
@@MushroomManC you good?
@@MushroomManC are you alive or dead 😂😂 or you were really dead 😵😵
Doing overacting
@@MushroomManC join astral projection community or reddit and discord. So you can remember your past life. Or if you want to do astral projection intentionally. Practice meditation in Buddhist
7:52 You could also ask: if a tree falls and you're deaf, does it make a sound?
Sounds are just waves perceived by animals with ears.
0.5 seconds before opening the box*
Cat: meows
Schrodinger: shut up!
lol😂
Now I know that the fridge is a Schrodinger's Fridge
Dudeeee, holy moly I just realized that.
My schrodingere fridge is always empty :(
As the wise man once said:
*So that was a fucking lie.*
The bootstrap paradox always infuriates me. Other paradoxes are either offered as obvious situational oxymorons - or as riddles to be thought through.
But people take the bootstrap paradox - a hypothetical situation that can't be traced back to any point of origin - and just go "wouldn't that be weird?" As if it's not even ten times more nonsensical to conceive of a situation that - by definition - happens for no reason.
You seem like someone who has never had very much fun at all.
agreed
And, news flash, time travel isn't real!
i think the solution for the bootstrap paradox is that someone else or the same boy wrote that book then found a time machine and went back in time to publish that book in the name of william shakespear, then their future self loved william shakespear and found the time machine, went back in time and published the book, and it goes full cycle
@@betagamp no, the real answer is just this wouldn’t happen ever. It’s like saying a Giant ant knocks in your door. But ants aren’t giant, and they can’t knock on doors. So this situation is a paradox! The ant paradox! That’s what the bootstrap paradox is like, essentially.
This feels like verbally going around in circles, or simply “shower thoughts”
... after he saw a certain episode of Wandavision.
Shower thought: Everybody could be colorblind, but colorblind people could see the true colors of life.
If colour blind people can see the true color of life then that means they can see colors and if they can see colors they are not color blind 🤔🤔 ...... think about it
If they can see the true colors of life, then why can't they tell the difference between some of them while we can?
@@meetbhatt7435 if we’re thinking in terms of the colors we see, then yes. Colors don’t actually exist.
@@scriptedjava265 yeah, they are just shades
no.
Imagine killing youre grandfather and not dissapearing
*Adoptednes intesifies*
your*
disappearing*
Im not gonna change ge my comment to the correct words
@@kingschapter9490 intensifies*
Well technically you wouldn't disappear
You might disappear because then he would’ve never adopted you, and you could’ve ended up being killed, or left somewhere, or get parents that are murderers.... you never know.
4:50 Vsauce music starts playing
5:36
"As any normal person wouldn't do he got inside the time machine."
Dammit, he got me there, not gonna lie🤣
I get déjà vu all the time and it terrifies me cause I get it at the most random things, a movie I’ve never seen before, a conversation with strangers I’ve never meet, all sorts of stuff. I’m telling you, I’m a time traveler
@@lovrokorosak9144 yeh nah science 😑
feel ya xD
Same! Sometimes i'm in a random conversation with someone and I say, "I think I had a dream about talking to you," and they just slowly back away...
Correction WE are time travelers
We came in groups to stop the invasion xD
what I've heard is that it's a phenomenon where the memory of the moment stores in the brain before the processing of the moment has finished, which causes the brain to think it's experienced that exact moment before!
That is like saying: 'Am I still me if every cell in my body is replaced, am I still the same person?'. The reactions that I made may be different than me with my old cells because of different chemical reactions in the brain, but my cells are replaced at a different time, not all at once, right (especially when I am/growing or changing size, because I need more or less cells to sustain my life) so what changes at a different time?
Did that make any sense?
no
Do read about the Ship of Theseus Paradox
Another way of putting the ship of Theseus paradox
Some think the matter matters, some think the timing matters, and some think the idea of the object matters
Vsause talked about this a little
"What kind of thoughts do you have in showers?"
The shower thoughts:
The only thing keeping us original is our consciousness. No one would know of anyone was suddenly replaced with a clone but themselves. Only the original person knows.
But are you really original if they took original part from your body (say a finger) to make the clone and the part that were taken were replaced by an artificial part? Neither you nor the clone would be original because both you and the clone were modified to create something whole
@@kingyg6489 you have a point my dude. Thanks for sharing
If someone managed to replace all your memories somehow, would you still be you? Our experiences create our personality.
@@kingyg6489 Excellent point actually. However, you still create your own experiences through your thoughts and actions. So while your body parts may not be original, your thoughts still are. But if you took like a couple brain cells and made a clone, no one would know.
what is the difference between a clone of a person and himself
This is the big brain version of “I demand you to not listen to my demand”
I understand literally nothing yet everything.
Oh and, congrats on 1Million 🎈
Tis da human condition.
You understand it for a moment, but your brain doesn't have the storage to contain all the information, so in reality you understood nothing.
what?
@@frostyfrostbite406 you must be quite smart. The human brain has ~3 petabytes of storage. If you have that all filled with information and not capable of consuming more information, you're quite smart.
Edit: that just happened to me. Holy shit
2nd edit: goddamn it. I was supposed to sleep tonight.
@@tarkkokuokkanen1060 lol
My problem with the fridge light and tree in the forest questions is that there is actually a correct answer to it, based on physics and logic and stuff. For the fridge light, there is a switch, that when pressed, turns off the light, which is placed so that when the door is closed, it presses the switch. And for the tree in the forest, yes, it makes a sound, because that’s how physics works. (Also that question overlooks the fact that humans aren’t the only living things that can hear)
But there's new quantum physics studies states different... It was a study done on the wave or particle nature of a molecule ... I'm not sure if you have heard about it . But it basically ended with the conclusion that that molecule formed itself as particle when there were observers and when there were no observers that was just simply waves and that is not even visible...
So it just basically states that we observers give the world a shape . Physics aren't that easy as you think:')
@@shinihahaha4142 Oh of course! Quantum physics and all that are a completely different thing and really cool. And the whole Schrödinger’s Cat thing, as mentioned in the video, is really interesting. I just really dislike the fridge light and tree falling in the forest questions in particular, because _those_ are stupid.
@@TheOverArchiver Quite actually they are kind of... The fridge thing really sounds stupidest tho as well as the tree thing.. maybe they are viewing it from different point of view that seems amusing to them ... I really don't know 😅 .
I've been a woodcutter for 50 years, and this old axe has been my constant companion. I've replaced the shaft 7 times, and it's currently on its fourth head, and if ever I had to get another, I'd get one of the same type.
but.... is it the same axe, and wait u already got another one
If you've replaced the shaft and head of the axe several times, is it really the same axe?
@@bobross7058 That's what makes it a joke.
@@DownhillAllTheWay so the joke was you wouldn't actually get one of the same brand?
@@bobross7058 Oh boy! Jokes are always best when they are well explained. The joke is that the woodcutter thinks he still has the original axe!
Aperture: "THIS VIDEO IS A LIE"
Me: *"I got better shower thoughts"*
This guy is just leaving us in a infinity loop.
Ikr? cruel.
Maybe thats why he said this video is a lie so you just dont belive it and go back to reality
@@ihatemylife4213 and what exactly is reality?
Reality hmm it exists but is tiny but maybe over of course maybe not
vsauce lead us in a infinity loop because every question is copied from vsauce
My favorite concept of time travel is the simplest one.
One linear timeline. Everything a time traveller does in the past has already been done. There is no changing anything that is, because obviously nobody did. Or it would already be done.
You can conceive killing your grandfather. But obviously you never will, because you are still here.
It's the simplest and I think the best form of time travel. Not many paradoxes to consider, and easily understood and explained.
The one downside is that it can be hard to tell a story with it. As it's hard to craft surprises and challenges for the characters.
A good one however, is the book series "Off to be the Wizard".
Good explaining, underrated comment and makes sense
Everyone in comments is so smart. What do all these big words mean?
You should watch the series dark that series is based on that concept
@@khushjain2684 i watched it and didn't understand much 😅 very confusing stuff
Yes, this is my favorite too. I think this is how it was done in the third harry Potter book. They went back, but everything technically already happened the first time, they just didn't know. Harry even sees himself across the lake but assumes it's his father the first time around. I always loved that book due to how neatly the time travel wrapped up the story.
“Have you heard about the theory of the ship of Theseus” V’Shawn J’arvis
that's what I was thinking lol
What is drip, if not swag persevering?
Recently used in WandaVision lol
Its interesting tho
@@kevindelacruz5900 lmao
@@bezeani8836 lmao
"this video is sponsored by brilliant"
me: so that was a fü¢king lie
Loool
Lol
Loooool
Plot twist: The only lie is the title
*:o*
😯
If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a liebut then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie.
🤯
🤔
@@cen7465
Is title considered to be a portion of a video?
if "this entire video is a lie" is a lie then the truth would be that the video is not entirely lying
“You are familiar with the thought experiment the Ship of Theseus in the field of identity metaphysics?”
I request elaboration.
I got that...
I’m so glad I’m not the only one who thought of that while watching this video 😂
Naturally
@@MisterPink. The Theseus ship one is a much older version of the cruise ship one that existed since the legend of Theseus, with a wooden ship. This comment is talking about the paradox after it, which is the same concept applied to the ever changing human body.
Did anyone else think of Wanda vision when he started talking about the ship paradox
Yes
I came in the comments to find someone to make that connection
Was looking for this comment
"Everything in this video is a lie"
THEN THAT SENTENCE IS ALSO A LIE MEANING, NOT EVERYTHING IN THIS VIDEO IS A LIE, NOW YOU CAN DECIDE WHICH IS A LIE, AND WHICH IS NOT
You are in my mind!
It's both since if the vid is a lie that's a lie making atleast a part of it true but u can still say that's a lie and the rest of the vid is true they give only 2 options when there should be more
We share the same brain cells
that video can be both a lie and a truth, since a half truth doesnt make a truth but still a lie. So the sentence is indeed a lie.
It's more like an illegal construct or, perhaps, a syntax error. It's not valid. B well all. :)
One of my favorite solutions to the heap of sand problem is measuring how likely it is to be a heap of sand based on the quantity, not if it is or isn't.
Logical error. If everything in this video is a lie, including that statement, it does not automatically make everything in the video true, it only negates the idea that it's all a lie. The statement itself can be a lie and leave the rest of the video as truthful.
Referring to Aristotle's logic - "Everything in this video is a lie." when negated becomes "Not everything in this video is a lie" which in turn equates to "There is a single truthful statement in the video". However, such an approach implies that the video is not homogenous but rather a totality of independent propositions and thus avoids the Liar Paradox. However, it does not resolve it.
The idea of the Liar Paradox manifests itself when deliberating on the truth value of an utterance as a whole (i.e. in our case, when taking into account the idea of logical conjunction where "A and B is true" only when "A is true" and "B is true"). Therefore in a complex statement of the type: "A and B and C and ... " a false singular statement makes the whole conjunction false as well. One of the ways to solve the Liar Paradox is then, again, similar to your idea - adverting to fuzzy logic (where the things can be partially truthful). There are of course other interesting solutions as well - you may try looking up Alfred Tarski's theory on metalanguages and Saul Kripke's subsequent criticism, as well as Kripke's views on ungrounded statements.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox
plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/
@@alexsavova8940 The statement "not everything in this video is a lie" does not simply equate to "there is a single truthful statement in the video." It also equates to "there are several truthful statements in this video," "all but one statement in this video is true," "most statements in this video are true," "a few statements in this video are true," and so on. I don't think that my comment needed to become this complicated, honestly. I only pointed out that the negation did not mean the entire video was truthful, only that it wasn't all lies, that the things said in it still may or may not be true and let it stand as that. I wasn't trying to resolve a liars paradox, just point out an error in logic.
I don't really see how the logic is fuzzy. I think the logic is pretty clear, but I can see how it might make the ability to figure something out a little more complicated as is the case in things being partially truthful, so maybe you can say the logic makes the problem fuzzy, but not the logic. To me, fuzzy would refer to something being difficult to separate, difficult to determine, hard to see, but the logic I proposed was pretty simple. In actuality, the idea of a paradox is pretty fuzzy as paradoxes usually only manifest when something is not fully understood and logic is usually necessary to clear it up.
I do appreciate the links, though, and I'm sure others who may stumble across your comment will appreciate them as well.
@@genostellar Probably, I didn't say it very clear - I meant "There is *at least* one truthful statement" (which I didn't clarify).
Speaking of the "fuzzy logic" - I meant the theory of fuzzy logic (where truth can accept all values between 0 and 1). It is used primarily in Informatics. I'm not saying your logic is fuzzy (or flawed). Conversely, I liked what you said - I found it interesting and original. :)
@@alexsavova8940 Ah, I see. Thank you for clearing all of that up. I appreciate your comments as well. They are very informative.
Ahun smart as dumb
If this video is a lie then....DOES THAT MEAN YOU LIED ABOUT THIS VIDEO BEING A LIE?!-
no because title of the video is not a video
The title and thumbnail are not the video
That's the paradox. Say a true statement is said to be false, including the statement that says it's false. Since the statement stating that the statement is false, includes itself, wouldn't that mean the statement stating the statement is false, be false? But if the statement stating that the statement is false, is false, wouldn't that mean the statement is true?
(You have no idea how long it took me to write this)
@@m07z You have no idea how many times I had to re-read this in order to understand it🤯
As a child I always thought about something I came up with myself: “do I know everything? I don’t know. But that means I don’t know everything because I don’t know if I know everything. But now I know that I don’t know everything so the argument that I don’t know if I know everything is irrelevant so I again don’t know if I know everything.”
This killed one of the my last two brain cells
I had kind of the same thing. One day I thought: "is there anything we can know 100% for sure? I mean I'd say something like 'I know this table is made out of wood' but what if that's somehow just some kind of an illusion?" and then the next day I thought "there is one thing that I can know for sure, and it's that there's nothing I can know for sure. But if that's the case, then it means that there is something I know for sure, so not everything is unsure, but that would mean that I don't know for sure that I can't know anything for sure" so yeah think about that. Since then I've found a couple more things that you can know for sure either way, things like "I think so I exist", or "I'm 100% sure that whatever an apple is in my thoughts, even if it doesn't physically exist, tastes good in my opinion".
I hope someone reads that lmao
@@molrat I read it and I agree that apples taste good
@EC - 05FJ 805270 Castlebridge PS I know, I read it too and I responded to the last phrase.
This dude needs to make a podcast
The statement, "this entire video was a lie" is either true or false. But just because the statement is false does not prove that the inverse must be true. Everything said up to that point in the video could be true and the statement would still be false.
But couldn’t it also be both true and false? Since the title is describing the video, since the video itself is true then the statement “this entire video is a lie” is a lie. And since the title is part of the video, it confirms itself while also establishing that its ultimately false. This makes it a paradox, which is the entire point of the video
you also can excape the paradox because he said 'a lie' and not '''false', because wether something is a lie or not only depends on the belief of the person who says it. but that's not interesting...
@@vaquishers The title is metadata, not part of the video.
This video is basically describing itself thus making it autological. The video ends in a loop but since it's a loop that meant it never ended in the first place which makes it so it is repeating its own statements but has different views to all of them. This means the video is neither a lie nor the truth , if it was a lie than the statement would be true but if the statement is a lie then the video is true , see none of it actually existed in the first place , rather it was just a trick played by our minds which think in a way in which we cannot absorb all of the knowledge. People say the world is running on the word "logic" but does logic really come in this point . Even the word logic isn't logically correct as In logic, an argument can be invalid even if its conclusion is true, and an argument can be valid even if its conclusion is false. ... All of the premises are true, and so is the conclusion, but it's not a valid argument. So if we really look into it We don't know that logic is true. In an abstract sense, we know that it's valid by confirming it with an argument. Truth is some satisfactory correlation between the conclusion and reality. If that's what you're asking about then the answer is the same for almost everything people are generally concerned with.
@@Theraot the title was mentioned in the video itself. Something I found out after watching the entire thing. Thus it is part of the video, as he himself has confirmed the very same paradox I just described
Shower thought. : you didn't even know I existed until you read this comment 🤯
Underrated comment
The comment above is false ^
The comment above is also false ^
The comments above are very much false
The comment above is false too
“The Ship of Theseus is an artifact in a museum. Over time, its planks of wood rot and are replaced with new planks. When no original plank remains is it still the Ship of Theseus?” - Vision.
There are two possibilities:
A: Let's say the planks were changes periodically. Like, out of a 100 total planks, 10 were changed once, a year later, 10 more were changed and so on until all 100 planks were changed. Now when the first ten were changed, the 90 old and 10 new planks became original. Like a drop of water in ink would make that drop pigmented as well. Thus, if the planks are changed gradually, the ship is still the original.
B. The planks are changed all at once, than it is no longer the original ship because if the ink drop is taken away and only the water is added, the water does not become pigmented.
But then again, it's pretty unrealistic for all planks to be changed at the same instant.
this guy is taking discussions you had with your friend at grade 6 and trying to sound deep is the most hilarious thing I've seen in youtube
I thought of the grandfather paradox myself after I went to some TED talk and I told my friends, I thought I was some kind of absolute fucking genius until I got home, asked reddit just for someone to point out this already exists. Goodbye ego 😂
You ARE sort of a genius because you still thought of it yourself... You're just not the first to think of it-
I know a solution to the grandfather paradox lol
@@antarctica0061 but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?That is a theory but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?.that is a theory but it was already made.
Fun fact: this video is only a lie because Aperture is a lie but he is not a lie which means that this video is the truth
But if this video is the truth, since it's called a lie, it's true that it's a lie, so it's a lie!?
@@payenappeule My head hurts😖
No this video is a lie so the title is a lie making the video and the title true
Which means its a lie
U prolly lying.
"...forever. This begs the question:"
"Charmin Ultra Strong..."
Perfect timing as always, RUclips
Regarding the time travel paradox:
I would like to start with reminding everyone that "negative", by itself, doesn't exist in the universe. It is, mainly, just a matter of direction. That is going back in time implies negative time which isn't possible. I mean can you go back in space? Is there negative space? Why would there be negative time? Going back in time means going back in time dimension, not direction. This is the first misconception. You can go back in space direction, not dimension.
Secondly, if we were to bypass all these first-level logic barriers to reach our paradox, my party-ruining ass would still interfere saying that I really believe that going back in time IS the paradox before you even need to do anything. Being in your own past as the "future you" means that you have always been there and you should be older than you are, thus creating this loop of paradoxes. However, if you were there as another replica of your future self, then killing your grandfather will not harm you since you are from a separate timeline.
but you wouldn't be older. If you went back in time when you are 50, you would still be 50 when you arrive. Perhaps die around 80, then some time later, you're born... again. But just as you have always been. And then you will grow up to time travel when you are 50... again. Its a loop. You will die from your perspective at 80, and will die at 80 from others perspective, but will cease to exist in a future where you grow older than 50 without time traveling.
@@vjexmixv yes but this scenario implies going to a separate timeline... so killing your grandfather won't affect you... going with the same timeline immediately creates an age paradox
@@faisaldeeb6479 no; the paradox is fixed if a new timeline is created: who killed the grandfather? You from another timeline. The new timeline’s you is dead, but the time traveling, old timeline you lives on. Rather, the paradox comes in the self fulfilling time travel system, famously represented in Harry Potter, where the events in the future cause the causes of the future events in the past, or vice versa with events and causes, because they are really both causes, and both events/effects.Like how harry saves his past self. In the same timeline. Only fulfilling the events of the past and future.
Wouldn't anti atoms be considered negative?
@@zmansadventures No, they don't take up negative space. They just have an opposite charge. They still exist as things taking up space with a positive size, albeit a very small size.
This guy has to start a podcast or just upload his videos to spotify
I promise I'll spend so long listening to them bc his voice it the most soothing voice I've ever heard, and he has interesting videos
“Finally, I have found the sword of Lies!”
*”I am the sword of lies!”*
*confused screaming*
Maybe it has the OPTION to say something true every now and then? Or that's the only true thing it can say? Or something
I had a deja vu today..... But the thing was, everything happened EXACTLY the same way with EXACTLY the same people... Like I'm sure it was not a coincidence
I get deja vu when I grasp how a situation could occur, and sometimes if the situation is common enough it reoccurs in real life.
Isnt this how a deja vu is suppose to be, sorry my brain is fried atm💀
@@VolodosIsTheGoat idk if this is deja vu but I get dreams of events and then the events happen
@@toxicvold3164 Same.
if it was an interaction with people, it could've been more of a prediction by your brain. it saw how those people were acting and subconciously figured out what they were most likely to say. our brains our INCREDIBLY smart and can predict things like that, it's just mostly done in the subconcious and rarely effects our day-to-day life. that's what deja vu usually is; our brains subconciously decoding the future, and then being satisfied when it's currect. if it was more preminition style then deja-vu, then your actions may easily have been subconsiously affected by it as well.
I have a somewhat answer to the ship paradox.
when we add a new part to the ship, it becomes a part of the ship and the ship is whole again. now no matter what and how many parts are replaced it's still the same ship by this principle
Instructions unclear: made hitler meet dinosaurs to create a mind control device to make us live in a matrix where a few of us think that we live in a matrix
The "omnipotence paradox" is easy to solve.
The answer to "can God create a rock so big he can't lift it" is "if he wants."
God, having all power, can choose to limit himself. And if he chooses to limit himself, he can create a rock he can't lift. But only if that's what he chooses to do. He could also create the rock, and then choose to be able to lift it, right after not being able to.
Pretty simple. It's up to God whether or not he can lift it. In fact, if you're talking about the Christian God, he came to earth as a man, therefore weak and unable to lift a lot of rocks. But he could have easily chosen to lift them if he wanted to.
Please show me the source of your claim that God has ever been on earth as we know it....
@@emroullahzevzetoglu2788 His comment was a hypothetical thing, not for certain...
I would also add one thing: how big does a rock need to be for God to not be able to lift it?
If we're talking about an infinite being, the rock would need to be infinitely big. And then it isn't a rock anymore by definition. For it to be a "rock," it needs boundaries in physical space.
So in summary, the question itself is paradoxical and makes no sense.
@@miyu1424 read my comments. I covered those bases already. The same principal applies to an anvil btw
@@miyu1424 well there's two ways to break it down to my knowledge. You could say that, since God is infinite, the anvil would also have to be infinite, in which case it is no longer an anvil. The other way to look at it is that God could, at any time, flip a switch and decide to lift the anvil he previously decided to not to be able to lift.
Omnipotence means that you have the power over *everything.* Including the laws of the universe and what is, and is not, and what can be, and what cannot be. So God can choose to limit himself, he can also unlimit himself again.
Basically, if an omnipotent being exists, a paradox isn't allowed to exist. Because God can simply override any law; anything we deem impossible could happen at any time.
So my original comment stands. The answer to the question is "if he wants."
The simplest paradox: *”What I’m saying is a lie”*
I’ve thought of this before, crazy how a teenager thought of (on their own) the grandfather paradox
12:32 no don't leave me alone, I don't know how to decide, I have no idea...
I think that, everything is just left as the original or everybody is dead in the 'Grandfather Paradox's' scenario.
There’s a video by minutephysics about it.
After killing your grandfather, you are dead and can’t kill him. So he comes back to life and goes through the events of his life up to the point where you decide to kill him. It’s a loop.
@@spodreman7732 I'd agree that it's going to be a loop or just that the timeline stops at that exact moment. It's not like we would truly know the answer anyway.
See this is all because of Logic. Logic and time don't really get together. Logic is just a unit we made for our selves so we could understand things. But some things like these defy logic themselves. So that means we will truly never know the answer
Aperture: “this begs the question…”
*ad in 5
*4
*3
*2
*1
Ad: “why aren’t you calm like the money super market bull?”
8:40
This wasn't his argument, it was actually the exact opposite.
His argument was against the argument that "things must be observed to be true." (The tree falling when nobody is there is an example)
It was meant to be an ad absurdum argument. Essentially, he was saying that the cat could not be both alive and dead, so it must have a defined state, even if nobody was observing it.
Very big simplification, but you can look into it yourself.
The quote from Wikipedia: "This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935,[1] in a discussion with Albert Einstein,[2] to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics."
Also, the measurement paradox is specifically related to problems where the only way to measure an attribute will itself change that attribute.
"this video is a lie"
*_visible confusion_*
The video: "it is not that simple"
Me: "It will be if you don't overthink it"
THANK YOU!!!
Wow
God
my favorite line:
"congratulations, you're a murderer"
How did he know?
@Ahnaf Ar Rahman what is your body count?
@@mustafakaunain5904 around 19
@Ahnaf Ar Rahman where's your hideout, I promise I will not tell anybody.
Only Aperture can make me have an existential crisis and make me think so hard that my brain hurts at the same time
"Is anything I said true? "
I am going to give that a solid maybe
8:56 “we went pretty ‘dark’ there”
I see what you did
Is it *immature* of me to ask if it was a DARK (The German Web Series) reference?
@@abhinavwalkey3422 no in fact you’re right
@@aar6538 yeah thought so
Aparture: I have a confession to make
Me: Everyone has something to confess, but I'm only interested in your confession 😂
the smallest paradox i can think of is "this statement is a lie" containing only 5 words
How to tell if the light in the fridge turns off when you close it: Start recording on your phone, put your phone in the fridge, and close the door. Then open it back up, stop recording, and watch the recording.
Big brain...unless
The recording is false
@@PastelLePanda that brings into question the existence of a lot of things that are very hard to just ignore, including the phone, the light, and it also brings conspiracy theories into question, cause i wouldn't believe footage of a phone is naturaly faked in such a specific way. I need sleep.
Judt find the lever the door pushes in to shut light off
@@thomashaeyen6942 They're all huge things. Reality is much smaller. Think Plank lengths and smaller. The building blocks. :)
I guess you have studied the electron's double slit experiment.
The craziest thing just happened to me Last Christmas around October I was driving home from work in my room walking around and my step sister gave me this painting but she drew it in Spanish so I couldn't even hear it and it was so loud that I went blind so I told her I needed some watermelon because seven is my favourite colour on God, then she got stuck over a table then she got pregnant with her frist kid for the third time and that's why you shoud treat others the way you wanna be treated
Wtf
Hellelujah, amen & awomen...
Did you have a stroke
@@sharktacos how did you the you that you are you?
?
The title of this video is “This Video is A Lie”
If this video is a lie then he’s lying about it being a lie which means its the truth but it can’t be the truth because it’s a lie so that was a lie.
this gives vibes that make me want to rethink my life in general, not my life choices or assumptions, just my life in general.
if You'd go back in time, you'd just end up in empty space, where the earth was at that point, where our solar system was at that point, where the galaxy was at that time within the local group, where at that time the local group was within the cluster, where that was within the filaments of space.....you're travelling back in time, not the whole planet. The easier explanation is that time is movement through space, rather than existing as an actual thing. it's a man made conscious concept to help us understand the continuation of reality and movement of matter in space, which for us observers seems like "time". It's a tool, not an underlying law of physics. And this is being understood more and more as such in the last years in science.
You can account for this though
so if I walk back to where I was a few seconds ago, I've time travelled?
So are you saying that if nothing moves time has not passed
@@ZootyTooter That's my same question, it sounded amazing at first glance, but doesn't make any sense
@@djroneh99 time has to be real for some fundamental concepts of physics to make sense
"there's a rainbow after every storm"
past me: "I've seen a rainbow before a storm"
present me: *facepalm*
Bravo👏😂
Whole video I was like "i understand, no i don't" of Schrödinger's cat.
Sometimes, in my mind, I see myself as two people, one is my adult self and the other is my child self, like the really young version of me. I'm the adult version, the child is still there but that isn't me anymore. He still lives there even though I barely recognize him, I share his memories but even that is very foggy and a lot of the memories are lost maybe forever. This is what life feels like for me nowadays.