Thanks David and Cecil. I bought my 16 - 300 before I saw this video. You confirmed for me that I definitely made the right choice. I've been using it with a Nikon D7100 body and couldn't be happier with the lens. Thanks again !
I actually just bought this lens. I will be traveling out west soon and I plan on taking this lens with me. Your video was so helpful. I have a D3200 and a D7100.
Hi David thank you for the informative video. I am thinking about stepping up to a DSLR camera but still undecided on what lens or lenses I should buy. This is a great lens that I think would do everything but some reviews are saying the AF is slow, Not sure if that would be bad for me since I am not a pro. Any suggestions?
Thank you for the review. There are few reviews on this lens, and yours was very helpful. I considered buying a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR or the Tamron 16-300mm. My choice came down to: 16mm vs 18mm $900 v.s. $600. 6-Year Tamron Warranty. I'm not insinuating that $600 is chump change, far from it. Because super zoom lenses are always a compromise between convenience and image quality, I couldn't stomach the Nikon's $900 price tag. I purchased the Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD. Does the Tamron 16-300 produce better images than my Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G for portraits? My Micro Nikkor 85mm f/3.5 for Macro? My 35mm f/1.8 for fast street photography shots? No it doesn't. When I just want to go out and not be weighed down by a bag full of lenses, the Tamron 16-300's convenience makes up for any shortcomings.
thank you for your video, despite of all good features with this lens, do you think it is trustable lens for high quality and sharpness like canon 24-105 f4 on canon 70d?
mrz 1342 If you think the canon 24-105 f4 is 'trustable lens for high quality' then you will appreciate this tamron. The 24-105 is not even sharp, tamron outperforms it optically, with a much better range.
+ABHISHEK PRASAD The 90mm is a dedicated Macro lens, so if you are looking strictly for macro, I'd go with that one. However, if you need more versatility for things like travel and/or landscape, too, then I'd go with this one.
Наука
Thanks David and Cecil. I bought my 16 - 300 before I saw this video. You confirmed for me that I definitely made the right choice. I've been using it with a Nikon D7100 body and couldn't be happier with the lens. Thanks again !
I actually just bought this lens. I will be traveling out west soon and I plan on taking this lens with me. Your video was so helpful. I have a D3200 and a D7100.
A big Thanks for the video!
Thank you for this very nice review.
Hi David thank you for the informative video. I am thinking about stepping up to a DSLR camera but still undecided on what lens or lenses I should buy. This is a great lens that I think would do everything but some reviews are saying the AF is slow, Not sure if that would be bad for me since I am not a pro. Any suggestions?
This lens is awessome
very nice review, thank you
Thank you for the review. There are few reviews on this lens, and yours was very helpful. I considered buying a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR or the Tamron 16-300mm. My choice came down to:
16mm vs 18mm
$900 v.s. $600.
6-Year Tamron Warranty.
I'm not insinuating that $600 is chump change, far from it. Because super zoom lenses are always a compromise between convenience and image quality, I couldn't stomach the Nikon's $900 price tag. I purchased the Tamron 16-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD.
Does the Tamron 16-300 produce better images than my Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G for portraits? My Micro Nikkor 85mm f/3.5 for Macro? My 35mm f/1.8 for fast street photography shots? No it doesn't. When I just want to go out and not be weighed down by a bag full of lenses, the Tamron 16-300's convenience makes up for any shortcomings.
Quality seems great. I wonder if I'd get the same sharpness on my nikon D5500 though
Im choosing between this and nikon 18-300 f3.5-6.3, which one would you recommend more
Hi David thank you for the informative video. Do you know if this lens works with the Olympus OM EM5 M II?
Quietpro Link this particular legs does not. However, Tamron makes a 14-150 for Olympus micro four thirds.
thank you for your video, despite of all good features with this lens, do you think it is trustable lens for high quality and sharpness like canon 24-105 f4 on canon 70d?
mrz 1342 If you think the canon 24-105 f4 is 'trustable lens for high quality' then you will appreciate this tamron. The 24-105 is not even sharp, tamron outperforms it optically, with a much better range.
Hello. I have one question: This lens will fit to a Nikon D5300?
how does this work with canon eos 80d .. thanks in advance
does the 16-300 fit well on the 6D ?
which is better for nikon d7000, tamron 16 300 or nikon 18 270?
TAMRON 16-300PZD :
ruclips.net/video/OxMiImX0HwI/видео.html
I tried it in the store & notice some softness in the pictures. Can you comment on this please.
which one is better tamron 90mm or this lens for macro, please suggest
+ABHISHEK PRASAD The 90mm is a dedicated Macro lens, so if you are looking strictly for macro, I'd go with that one. However, if you need more versatility for things like travel and/or landscape, too, then I'd go with this one.
Thanks for the review. Have you tried shooting some dragonflies with it?
I haven't, but I have shoot other macro subjects without issue.
Is it fit for my nikon d3500
can i shoot a moon photograph this focal length
300mm
is this for crop or full frame?
This lens is designed for crop sensors. The Full Frame equivalent is the 28-300mm Lens here: www.tamron-usa.com/lenses/prod/28300_vcpzd.php#ad-image-0
Hello, is it fit for Nikon D3300?
Yes, the Nikon mount should work for you.
Thanks :D
Is this lens work with Canon 6d?
This lens is designed for the APS-C sized sensors. The Canon 6D is a Full Frame sensor camera.
Cecil Holmes
The problem is the vignetting.