Can*t really understand all the finger-pointing here. This crash represents two top safety picks, providing survival space and good chances for both drivers. It's decades of experience and the highest R&D budget putting the VW on top by a little margin. This doesn't mean the Tesla is unsafe. Instead it reveals how far the manufacturers have come. This crash would not have had any survivors just two decades ago.
The VW is not on top by a very little margin. The Tesla is just not that great designed. Other crash tests back this up. In all of them the Tesla had too much deformation and the doors were locked up. A car company owned by Elon Musk, expected outcome.
WoW! It is the best realistic crash test that I have ever seen! Tesla received more damage than Volkswagen because Tesla is lighter than Volkswagen. I'm really surprised that there are no corpses in both cars.
I don’t understand why they feel the need to point out every single tiny bend or crack in the cars underbodies. That’s not the goal of a crash test, to see which one sustains the most damage. In a crash like this, both cars will be totaled, so the point shouldn’t be to see which car has the most damage. It should be focused on which car absorbed the most energy in the crash while protecting the occupants of the vehicle. And since the Tesla has a nice even balance of energy absorbing components and high strength components, it’s be could guess that the people inside actually felt less force than those in the vw who came to a more abrupt stop because the vehicle while being strong did not absorb energy as well as the Tesla. However, both cars did great and both cars prove their safety in the real world.
Actually the ID.3 is around the same curb weight as this Model Y SR. The ID.4 is like 400 lbs. more. The ID.6 in this test is 950lbs. heavier. Just imagine how safe the Model Y would be if you added 950 lbs. of steel in the front. The same could be said for any car. But then you have an arms race of extra steel and weight to where you have 10,000 lb. SUVs hurtling down the freeways at 75 mph. We are already almost there with plenty of 5,000-6,000 lb. SUVs
@@flipadavis Bullshit. ID6 is marginally heavier and weighs the same as a tesla model Y with 4 passengers. Very realistic comparison as it could happen everyday on the road. Yet the Tesla crumples like carboard.
@@paname514 It could happen everyday on the road? So could an IDC hitting an 18 wheeler or the new Hummers.How do you think it would come out in such a crash?
I know i read all the comment and to be fair its kinda not fair beacuse the tesla model y is model x little brother so it kinda small and the wheel it made the door stuck but i also Saw comments about Volkswagen airbag fail and tesla death trap so to be honest i think the tesla lose im so sorry of tesla fans im also a tesla fan but i think they should of change the model y to model x it is fair to tesla fans and me so if they changed the tesla model y to x i would be happy to see the results
I think that the only reason the Tesla sustained MINOR DAMAGE is because of the weight difference in the cars, there for the VW has a better chance of surviving the crash since less forces are being put on the car, I think the car still did great
The Model Y wasn't as well built as the rest of the line up. Don't make excuses for the car. It's partly why they stopped production. If you're going to buy a Tesla, you buy the Model S.
@@dct124 Weight is one of the most important aspects when it comes to crash physics. The I.D6 weighs 283 - 371 kilos (623 - 817 LBS) more than the Tesla (depending on the Tesla model). That equates to between 14.1% - 19.4% in extra mass for the VW. A larger, heavier vehicle will always come out on-top in this type of crash with two modern day vehicles. It may be poorly built compared to others in the line up (I don't know, quoting you here) but that's not the reason it crumbled here. Crumpled or not, this is still a fantastic result. 10 years ago the result would have been far worse. 20 years ago would have resulted in extreme injuries. 30+ there would have been almost no chance for survival.
@@mach1nefan It is not significantly heavier. And Tesla had some serious problems with its front structure. Expected, since it is a shitty designed car.
Доброго времени суток. Ручки(дверные) у ID-6,в роде не механические были,а электрические(если не ошибаюсь). Вообще то,после ДТП, вряд ли будет открываться дверь(к дверям нужен питания,иначе ни как).
@@formulafish1536 Just look at how the dummy in the Id6 was pushed into the airbag vs how the dummy in the Tesla was pushed. You can clearly see the Tesla dummy experienced much less forces, judging an accident just by the exterior damage is plain stupid.
@@meriofrog It’s all good to say that the dummy was better off in the crash, but the crash structure is crushed, the door won’t open, and the airbag remains inflated. It’s all good to survive the crash, but you also need to escape the burning wreckage, and so far, 44 people have died in a Tesla crash either due to the crash, or due to burning alive because they couldn’t escape the car.
@@formulafish1536 The amount of stupidity coming from your comment is no match for my brain. First, of course the door won't open, it could be jammed in a simple sideswipe (there were incidents) in any car, let alone a 40 mph frontal crash. Second, the structure of the car held up really well, it's simple physics, if you crash into a car that's heavier, of course there is going to be more damage, the same goes for the Id6, bet that if the Id6 were to crash with a model x, the id 6 would crumple way more than the Tesla. Third, bringing up how many people died in cars is a losers argument, there are a lot of variables here, how old were the people? Did they have health issues related to the crash? For example having a heart problem, then having a heart attack during the crash. And most importantly, you should be able to compare how many people died in the Id6 vs the Tesla, but you can't, there are a lot more Teslas on the road than id6s, and if you wanna get into the data, 3 million cars, 44 deaths? That seems safe to me. And don't even get me started on the fires.
@@formulafish1536 And you glossed over the fact that the dummies inside the Id6 flew around the cabin hitting seats with their legs and HEADS, why didn't they release the injuries the dummies sustained???? MAYBE BECAUSE HOW THE CRASH LOOKS DOES NOT MATTER AS MUCH?? This video is made for the people that think if a car looks better in a crash it's safer. Bet that the injury data shows that the model y has way less of a chance of injury than the Id6.
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remain locked. Battery pack in Tesla is damaged and folded in several areas. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
The video can't tell much but the FUDsters being the crooked c*nts that they are will make up data. Then again making it up is all they can do. Right Paname?
@@paname514Actually the Tesla Y is built to crumble more which means less load on passengers in the crash. That’s the whole point of crumble zones and also the reason the front door can’t be opened. And the battery is clearly not starting to burn in either of the cars.
@@TurreTuntematon 100% false. As a Tesla Fanboy with a short-minded brain you cannot understand that crumple zones are not the body passenger cell of the car, but the part under the bonnet at the front. The goal of the passenger cell is to protect the passengers, not to crumble on them and trap them inside like the Tesla does. Furthermore, you didn't read the full data that demonstrates the passengers in the Tesla suffer from much more violent forces at the impact than in the Volkswagen, thus passengers in the Tesla are more injured than in the Volkswagen.
Just look at how the dummy of the Id6 was pushed into the airbag vs how the dummy of the Tesla was pushed. You can clearly see the Tesla dummy experienced way less forces than the Id6 dummy. Judging an accident by the exterior damage is just stupid, your door could get jammed from a simple sideswipe.
I think you should look closer. The VW Dummy hits the airbag right in the middle - that's how it should be, the Tesla Dummy nearly misses the airbag... you don't want that. :-)
@@mikelstudiosworld9484 The Tesla driver does not miss the airbag, it's the angle the video is filmed in. Plus, the ID6 is nearly 1000 pounds heavier than the Model Y, if you would crash the Model X into the ID6 the results would be way different. The Model Y performed amazingly for it's weight, the cabin was well protected and the driver had more than enough space to survive and all the airbags deployed accordingly.
You must be drunk. Take another look, and watch how the Tesla deaccelerates within the crash vs how the VW deaccelereates. The VW utilizes the entire crumplezone with a steady deacceleration. The dummy inside is deaccelerated alongside the entire crash, and lands safely in the middle of the bag with no twist, as it doesnt hit the wheel. On the other hand, on the Tesla side, the crumple zone is poorly utilized ( no wonder with its frunk) and the major part of deacceleration happens when the VW is at the front window. See the car lift and twist suddenly at that point. Same thing is seen inside, where the dummy go through the airbag and actually hits the steering wheel so hard it bounces backwards with a twist. The neck and head is twisted by more than 90 degrees!
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remain locked. Battery pack in Tesla is damaged and folded in several areas. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
Video sponsored by VW for sure... the cars are not even the same class. Tesla weighs 1800 kg compare to VW 2200kg. It would be more fair to compare it with tesla x. But we know vw dieselgate etc.
Check when Volvo does a head on collision with a truck. THERE we talk about a disadvantage for the Volvo! ruclips.net/video/jGHsoF5F57s/видео.html Conclusion: There is less safe cars, there is more safe cars, there is Volvo. And Tesla is not in the lead so to say...
@@Xanthopteryx There are many stories about people surviving a crash because they didn't use seatbelt. Those stories cannot be used to conclude that seatbelts are dangerous. And the same about your video. One crash that happened in a random manner is not a way to compare Volvo against the others. You don't know the varibles here. You don't know how other car would have behaved if they hit the same truck, with the same angle at the same speed. The only way to compare is to either make exactly the same test or compare real statistic over many accidents for each brand and model. The video itself is impresive and in general Volvo is really secure - no doubt about that. But the point is just that you have no way of concluding is other brands would have been better or worse from the video. However - what I see from the video are that the active safety doesn't work / are not good enough. Many other cars would have avoided the crash at all by correcting the steering back to the lane.
@@larss3903 First of all: We already know that Volvo is the leader in passive safety. And they know it too. They have investigated around 40.000 real world accidents. And they have one of (or probably THE) worlds most advanced crash test lab, where they can replicate accidents like this. Active safety: That is an older generation of V70. I do not know if it a: had lane departure warning and b: if it was activated. Today it is standard, but probably not then. Most of the cars of that age did NOT have that system at all.
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remains locked. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
@@HVM_fi You Tesla Fanboy can't understand with your narrow mind that crumple zones are not the body passenger cell of the car, but the part under the bonnet at the front. The goal of the passenger cell is to protect the passengers, not to crumble on them and trap them like the Tesla. Furthermore, the full data demonstrates the passengers in the Tesla suffer from much more violent forces at the impact than in the Volkswagen, thus passengers in the Tesla are more injured than in the Volkswagen.
@@HVM_fi From actual NCAP testing, the Volkswagen ID3, ID4 and Enyaq and Audi Q4 e-Tron have better scores than any Tesla ever built. You're too dumb to even read it by yourself.
@@paname514 NCAP - they are all 5* But lets look at the %. There are no % score for the whole test. But lets compare adult protection: ID3 87% ID4 93% Q4 etron: 93% Enyaq: 94% Tesla 3: 96% Tesla y: not yet tested. - Did you really read the stuff before you make your comments? Why are you just throwing out comments that are not true? And even referring to a source? Are you one of those internet trolls? And why do you continue to downplay the law of physics that clearly says that weigh has a huge impact in a collision ? even stating that the difference would just be the same as 4 passengers? WTF! Then you should also 4 passengers to the VW if the test should be subjective. And then you should Tesla fanboy. None of the Tesla comments has ignored facts like you have. If there are any fanboys here its you.
@@alanmay7929 it would have, as the id6 is heavier than the model y. In the name of physics. The heavier the car has more force to it and when hit the heavier car crushed the lighter car
Can*t really understand all the finger-pointing here. This crash represents two top safety picks, providing survival space and good chances for both drivers.
It's decades of experience and the highest R&D budget putting the VW on top by a little margin.
This doesn't mean the Tesla is unsafe. Instead it reveals how far the manufacturers have come. This crash would not have had any survivors just two decades ago.
You need to focus on the thing, Tesla's front doors are locked they couldn't open it. This is the one of the biggest problem .
The VW is not on top by a very little margin. The Tesla is just not that great designed. Other crash tests back this up. In all of them the Tesla had too much deformation and the doors were locked up. A car company owned by Elon Musk, expected outcome.
I think id6 is better because at least the doors can be opened and not stucked as tesla. Am I right ?
Haqlısan əxim mənim
WoW! It is the best realistic crash test that I have ever seen!
Tesla received more damage than Volkswagen because Tesla is lighter than Volkswagen. I'm really surprised that there are no corpses in both cars.
I don’t understand why they feel the need to point out every single tiny bend or crack in the cars underbodies. That’s not the goal of a crash test, to see which one sustains the most damage. In a crash like this, both cars will be totaled, so the point shouldn’t be to see which car has the most damage. It should be focused on which car absorbed the most energy in the crash while protecting the occupants of the vehicle. And since the Tesla has a nice even balance of energy absorbing components and high strength components, it’s be could guess that the people inside actually felt less force than those in the vw who came to a more abrupt stop because the vehicle while being strong did not absorb energy as well as the Tesla. However, both cars did great and both cars prove their safety in the real world.
in that field id6 still won
What’s the weight difference between the two? I the VW is probably a much better and heavier car. Wouldn’t the id4 be a better comparison?
you are right, VW more heavier than model Y
Volkswagen is only marginally heavier. Only about 10% difference.
Actually the ID.3 is around the same curb weight as this Model Y SR. The ID.4 is like 400 lbs. more. The ID.6 in this test is 950lbs. heavier. Just imagine how safe the Model Y would be if you added 950 lbs. of steel in the front. The same could be said for any car. But then you have an arms race of extra steel and weight to where you have 10,000 lb. SUVs hurtling down the freeways at 75 mph. We are already almost there with plenty of 5,000-6,000 lb. SUVs
@@flipadavis Bullshit. ID6 is marginally heavier and weighs the same as a tesla model Y with 4 passengers. Very realistic comparison as it could happen everyday on the road.
Yet the Tesla crumples like carboard.
@@paname514 It could happen everyday on the road? So could an IDC hitting an 18 wheeler or the new Hummers.How do you think it would come out in such a crash?
I know i read all the comment and to be fair its kinda not fair beacuse the tesla model y is model x little brother so it kinda small and the wheel it made the door stuck but i also Saw comments about Volkswagen airbag fail and tesla death trap so to be honest i think the tesla lose im so sorry of tesla fans im also a tesla fan but i think they should of change the model y to model x it is fair to tesla fans and me so if they changed the tesla model y to x i would be happy to see the results
I think that the only reason the Tesla sustained MINOR DAMAGE is because of the weight difference in the cars, there for the VW has a better chance of surviving the crash since less forces are being put on the car, I think the car still did great
I agree! The VW is much heavier.
The Model Y wasn't as well built as the rest of the line up. Don't make excuses for the car. It's partly why they stopped production. If you're going to buy a Tesla, you buy the Model S.
Der VW ist 300kg schwerer! Das ist ein schlechter Vergleich.
MAJOR DAMAGE
@@dct124 Weight is one of the most important aspects when it comes to crash physics. The I.D6 weighs 283 - 371 kilos (623 - 817 LBS) more than the Tesla (depending on the Tesla model). That equates to between 14.1% - 19.4% in extra mass for the VW.
A larger, heavier vehicle will always come out on-top in this type of crash with two modern day vehicles.
It may be poorly built compared to others in the line up (I don't know, quoting you here) but that's not the reason it crumbled here.
Crumpled or not, this is still a fantastic result. 10 years ago the result would have been far worse. 20 years ago would have resulted in extreme injuries. 30+ there would have been almost no chance for survival.
Should either be model x vs id.6 or model y vs id.4
Exactly
OK so what were the results 🤔 of the crash tests which car did better ?
The ID.6, just about. Probably because it was significantly heavier than the Model Y.
@@mach1nefan It is not significantly heavier. And Tesla had some serious problems with its front structure. Expected, since it is a shitty designed car.
Доброго времени суток. Ручки(дверные) у ID-6,в роде не механические были,а электрические(если не ошибаюсь). Вообще то,после ДТП, вряд ли будет открываться дверь(к дверям нужен питания,иначе ни как).
yesli silno potenut to otkriayetca mexaniceski
Двери открываются на всех ID электрически и механически
Der iD6 ist 300kg schwerer! Besser wäre ein Vergleich mit dem iD3 oder iD4
The competition for the VW id6 is be the Model X, but considering the size difference the Model Y has performed very well.
Are you high or something? id6 price is max 50k, while X is 100k+ . even Y is more expensive than iD6! Damn Tesla fanboys are pathetic.
Go read the dinensions lol...
Model Y is 4.7m id6 is 4.8m model X is 5m
Id6 is half the price and still smaller then a model x it preformed flawlessly I’m impressed with vw
The both cars similar in sizes except tesla more wider
2:15 lol
This shows German quality is so good
Nah. It shows how Car Manufacturers build strong cars, whilst Tech companies with cult followings don’t have to build them
@@formulafish1536 Just look at how the dummy in the Id6 was pushed into the airbag vs how the dummy in the Tesla was pushed. You can clearly see the Tesla dummy experienced much less forces, judging an accident just by the exterior damage is plain stupid.
@@meriofrog It’s all good to say that the dummy was better off in the crash, but the crash structure is crushed, the door won’t open, and the airbag remains inflated. It’s all good to survive the crash, but you also need to escape the burning wreckage, and so far, 44 people have died in a Tesla crash either due to the crash, or due to burning alive because they couldn’t escape the car.
@@formulafish1536 The amount of stupidity coming from your comment is no match for my brain. First, of course the door won't open, it could be jammed in a simple sideswipe (there were incidents) in any car, let alone a 40 mph frontal crash. Second, the structure of the car held up really well, it's simple physics, if you crash into a car that's heavier, of course there is going to be more damage, the same goes for the Id6, bet that if the Id6 were to crash with a model x, the id 6 would crumple way more than the Tesla. Third, bringing up how many people died in cars is a losers argument, there are a lot of variables here, how old were the people? Did they have health issues related to the crash? For example having a heart problem, then having a heart attack during the crash. And most importantly, you should be able to compare how many people died in the Id6 vs the Tesla, but you can't, there are a lot more Teslas on the road than id6s, and if you wanna get into the data, 3 million cars, 44 deaths? That seems safe to me. And don't even get me started on the fires.
@@formulafish1536 And you glossed over the fact that the dummies inside the Id6 flew around the cabin hitting seats with their legs and HEADS, why didn't they release the injuries the dummies sustained???? MAYBE BECAUSE HOW THE CRASH LOOKS DOES NOT MATTER AS MUCH?? This video is made for the people that think if a car looks better in a crash it's safer. Bet that the injury data shows that the model y has way less of a chance of injury than the Id6.
Cool video to watch but what does it mean though? The differences are too subtle for us ignorant in the field to draw any conclusion.
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remain locked. Battery pack in Tesla is damaged and folded in several areas. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
The video can't tell much but the FUDsters being the crooked c*nts that they are will make up data. Then again making it up is all they can do. Right Paname?
@@paname514Actually the Tesla Y is built to crumble more which means less load on passengers in the crash. That’s the whole point of crumble zones and also the reason the front door can’t be opened. And the battery is clearly not starting to burn in either of the cars.
@@TurreTuntematon 100% false.
As a Tesla Fanboy with a short-minded brain you cannot understand that crumple zones are not the body passenger cell of the car, but the part under the bonnet at the front. The goal of the passenger cell is to protect the passengers, not to crumble on them and trap them inside like the Tesla does.
Furthermore, you didn't read the full data that demonstrates the passengers in the Tesla suffer from much more violent forces at the impact than in the Volkswagen, thus passengers in the Tesla are more injured than in the Volkswagen.
@@paname514 Why are you calling me a Tesla fanboy when I own no such car and have no intention to? Strange aggressive attitude.
German quality ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐😍
Made only in China :D
Just look at how the dummy of the Id6 was pushed into the airbag vs how the dummy of the Tesla was pushed. You can clearly see the Tesla dummy experienced way less forces than the Id6 dummy. Judging an accident by the exterior damage is just stupid, your door could get jammed from a simple sideswipe.
I think you should look closer. The VW Dummy hits the airbag right in the middle - that's how it should be, the Tesla Dummy nearly misses the airbag... you don't want that. :-)
@@mikelstudiosworld9484 The Tesla driver does not miss the airbag, it's the angle the video is filmed in. Plus, the ID6 is nearly 1000 pounds heavier than the Model Y, if you would crash the Model X into the ID6 the results would be way different.
The Model Y performed amazingly for it's weight, the cabin was well protected and the driver had more than enough space to survive and all the airbags deployed accordingly.
You must be drunk. Take another look, and watch how the Tesla deaccelerates within the crash vs how the VW deaccelereates. The VW utilizes the entire crumplezone with a steady deacceleration. The dummy inside is deaccelerated alongside the entire crash, and lands safely in the middle of the bag with no twist, as it doesnt hit the wheel.
On the other hand, on the Tesla side, the crumple zone is poorly utilized ( no wonder with its frunk) and the major part of deacceleration happens when the VW is at the front window. See the car lift and twist suddenly at that point. Same thing is seen inside, where the dummy go through the airbag and actually hits the steering wheel so hard it bounces backwards with a twist. The neck and head is twisted by more than 90 degrees!
Привет из России!
Pashol vatnik! Slava Ukraine!
@@konfunable ничего против славы Украине не имею. Привет из России))
ID 6 equivalent: Model X?
Yes!
Моя думка в айді більш шансі тим паче там двері відкриваюця а в тесли ні 😢
ID.6 足足2.8噸重，根本是皮卡吧😆
單這個重量就不想買了😂
The VW driver side airbag coming out of the windshield is probably a bad sign for the driver 🙈🙈. What's the verdict??
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remain locked. Battery pack in Tesla is damaged and folded in several areas. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
@@paname514 VW WERBUNG
@@deava9336 LMAO tesla fantroll
Чим більша вага і розмір авто ти більше в ньом шансів вижить моя думка
Esto no es justo deberia ser tesla Y vs vw id 4
Wow superb crash test
ID6 is 500KG heavier. Not a totally fair comparison. Model X would have been closer 20kg apart.
У тесли батарею з низу відірвало на цьому тесті
Tesla, at the very limit.
Video sponsored by VW for sure... the cars are not even the same class. Tesla weighs 1800 kg compare to VW 2200kg. It would be more fair to compare it with tesla x. But we know vw dieselgate etc.
Check when Volvo does a head on collision with a truck. THERE we talk about a disadvantage for the Volvo!
ruclips.net/video/jGHsoF5F57s/видео.html
Conclusion: There is less safe cars, there is more safe cars, there is Volvo. And Tesla is not in the lead so to say...
@@Xanthopteryx There are many stories about people surviving a crash because they didn't use seatbelt. Those stories cannot be used to conclude that seatbelts are dangerous.
And the same about your video. One crash that happened in a random manner is not a way to compare Volvo against the others. You don't know the varibles here. You don't know how other car would have behaved if they hit the same truck, with the same angle at the same speed. The only way to compare is to either make exactly the same test or compare real statistic over many accidents for each brand and model.
The video itself is impresive and in general Volvo is really secure - no doubt about that. But the point is just that you have no way of concluding is other brands would have been better or worse from the video.
However - what I see from the video are that the active safety doesn't work / are not good enough. Many other cars would have avoided the crash at all by correcting the steering back to the lane.
@@larss3903 First of all: We already know that Volvo is the leader in passive safety. And they know it too. They have investigated around 40.000 real world accidents. And they have one of (or probably THE) worlds most advanced crash test lab, where they can replicate accidents like this.
Active safety: That is an older generation of V70. I do not know if it a: had lane departure warning and b: if it was activated.
Today it is standard, but probably not then.
Most of the cars of that age did NOT have that system at all.
Reality is a bit different lol
Nonsense
Tesla deathtrap. You can't exit when it catches fire after the crash because the doors remains locked. Buy Volkswagen to be safe and save your life and your children.
What are you babbling trainboy? WV seem not able to sell any ID's at China, due shitty software. Also 6 weights more...
@@HVM_fi You Tesla Fanboy can't understand with your narrow mind that crumple zones are not the body passenger cell of the car, but the part under the bonnet at the front. The goal of the passenger cell is to protect the passengers, not to crumble on them and trap them like the Tesla.
Furthermore, the full data demonstrates the passengers in the Tesla suffer from much more violent forces at the impact than in the Volkswagen, thus passengers in the Tesla are more injured than in the Volkswagen.
@@paname514 VW seems to have overall lower safety scores than Tesla, from actual testing: NHTSA and NCAP. But you TSLAQ wannabes are boneheaded.
@@HVM_fi From actual NCAP testing, the Volkswagen ID3, ID4 and Enyaq and Audi Q4 e-Tron have better scores than any Tesla ever built. You're too dumb to even read it by yourself.
@@paname514 NCAP - they are all 5* But lets look at the %. There are no % score for the whole test. But lets compare adult protection:
ID3 87%
ID4 93%
Q4 etron: 93%
Enyaq: 94%
Tesla 3: 96%
Tesla y: not yet tested.
- Did you really read the stuff before you make your comments? Why are you just throwing out comments that are not true? And even referring to a source? Are you one of those internet trolls?
And why do you continue to downplay the law of physics that clearly says that weigh has a huge impact in a collision ? even stating that the difference would just be the same as 4 passengers? WTF! Then you should also 4 passengers to the VW if the test should be subjective. And then you should Tesla fanboy. None of the Tesla comments has ignored facts like you have. If there are any fanboys here its you.
Another reason not to buy american car
And VW is hated in china lol
annoying music
@牛车实验室
Тесла недуже якось фольсваген виграв а уявляю щоб булоб якщоб теслу столкнуть з айді 6 шансів нема😅
Tesla deathtrap!!!
Tesla actually performed super well! Maybe even better than the VW!
model X vs id.6 is the best.
It's unfair!
It wouldn't have been different.
@@alanmay7929 it would have, as the id6 is heavier than the model y. In the name of physics. The heavier the car has more force to it and when hit the heavier car crushed the lighter car
Want to see the g-force to the crashdummie.
more crumble zone should get less peak in g-force.
You could easily see that the dummy in the model y experienced way less g-forces than the one in the Id6.