Thanks for the video! 24-105mm range is very different from 28-105mm. For me, 24mm is very much needed in one-lens-does-it-all approach. Also, rf has internal zoom, and smoothest zoom ring I’ve ever experienced - it can literally be operated with one finger. For weather sealing point of view, internal zooming is something else. Professional shooting happens sometimes in bad weather, but customers are still expecting results. Heck, even personal shooting happens sometimes in bad weather. RF is bigger and more expensive though, which is a big factor obviously, but the lenses are not directly comparable.
The Sigma 28-105 f/2.8 is a cheap wanna be copy of the Canon RF 24-105 f/2.8. The Sigma doesn't have image stabilization, it's not internal zooming, no option for a zoom motor. Canon 24-105 f/2.8 for the win.
@rodricchan By the way, I'm not really hating on Sigma. The only non-Canon L Series lens I own, is the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 and I bought this when Canon had nothing comparable to it. It is a beast of a lens, but I would like to have that Canon 100-300.
That lens was mainly designed for video shooters, that's why it has the optional zoom motor and minor focus breathing.
Fantastic video, thank you.
Thanks for the video! 24-105mm range is very different from 28-105mm. For me, 24mm is very much needed in one-lens-does-it-all approach.
Also, rf has internal zoom, and smoothest zoom ring I’ve ever experienced - it can literally be operated with one finger. For weather sealing point of view, internal zooming is something else. Professional shooting happens sometimes in bad weather, but customers are still expecting results. Heck, even personal shooting happens sometimes in bad weather.
RF is bigger and more expensive though, which is a big factor obviously, but the lenses are not directly comparable.
@@alexmaccape8411 well written, not comparable yes but it’s getting close
Fire Video, Keep up the good work 🔥
The Sigma 28-105 f/2.8 is a cheap wanna be copy of the Canon RF 24-105 f/2.8. The Sigma doesn't have image stabilization, it's not internal zooming, no option for a zoom motor. Canon 24-105 f/2.8 for the win.
@@dreadnoughtphotowerkz if it works it works, photo will be excellent for that sigma but again at compromises
@rodricchan You're correct. I think most people will agree that if they could afford it, they would get the Canon over the Sigma.
@@dreadnoughtphotowerkz yup!
@rodricchan By the way, I'm not really hating on Sigma. The only non-Canon L Series lens I own, is the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 and I bought this when Canon had nothing comparable to it. It is a beast of a lens, but I would like to have that Canon 100-300.
If you didn't film this with such a wide aperture it might be possible to actually see the lenses you are holding in your hands
@@Reuel_Media I’m sorry but my room is untidy, I had to do 1.4 but I understand your concern. Let me use a wider aputure next round !
@@rodricchanWider implies faster/smaller f# btw, i think you triee to say narrower