Unbelievable Power of Two Man Crew RSI Scorpius

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024

Комментарии • 38

  • @piedpiper1172
    @piedpiper1172 2 месяца назад +1

    Strong disagree about F8C. It’s a one seater. Scorpious being faster is one of the very few times multicrew is almost worth whike in the game.
    For multicrew to ever matter, it must be vaguely competitive with being in two ships. So we have to eventually stop calling for endless pilot control power creep

  • @liamseven1604
    @liamseven1604 2 месяца назад +1

    makes me wonder how good the super hornet mk2 will be when that gets added one day, its gotta have more firepower then the mk1 turret right?

    • @piedpiper1172
      @piedpiper1172 2 месяца назад

      I just wish the mk 1 came with the f7a mk 1 turret instead of being such a pain to get lol

  • @AW-po7jr
    @AW-po7jr 2 месяца назад +1

    So, how do you manage to move the turret? It’s bugged since a long time. There is a workaround?

    • @AW-po7jr
      @AW-po7jr 2 месяца назад +2

      Nvm, I wrote before I saw the video.

    • @abelbeano
      @abelbeano 2 месяца назад +1

      There is you have to Deploy it

    • @AW-po7jr
      @AW-po7jr 2 месяца назад +1

      @@abelbeanodoesn’t work in 3.23. I hope it is fixed in 3.24 (in issue council they stated it’s fixed in a future build

    • @abelbeano
      @abelbeano 2 месяца назад +2

      @@AW-po7jr no it works you need to deploy it in the gunner seat and then after that roll the turret back and it will work

    • @auron44053
      @auron44053 2 месяца назад

      afaik u have to tractor off the gimbal mounts and reattach the weapons

  • @MagnaRads
    @MagnaRads 2 месяца назад

    Staggered fire mode is op

  • @Medi0cr3-
    @Medi0cr3- 2 месяца назад

    I didn't understand the context of why you cant use a tractor beam and then he said basically use a tractor beam over the station

  • @abelbeano
    @abelbeano 2 месяца назад +1

    You can fix the bug you have to Deplay the gun and it will fix it self

  • @Medi0cr3-
    @Medi0cr3- 2 месяца назад

    Also its "singe, no siege" :D

  • @starsburner
    @starsburner 2 месяца назад

    What happened to the damage model of the ships ? The ship explosions loook very shitty

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад

      @@starsburner Yeah they changed for some stupid reasons, but soft kill damage looks cool.

    • @starsburner
      @starsburner 2 месяца назад

      @@infinitespace239 yeh I was expecting that the ships explode at the end and fall in to peaces or crack and blow …. At least

  • @Bronx_Floridian
    @Bronx_Floridian 2 месяца назад

    Load out?

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад

      @@Bronx_Floridian 4 x size 3 omnisky, 4 x size 3 Banu singe Canons

  • @flynscottsmin
    @flynscottsmin 2 месяца назад

    take gimbles off the turret and it works

  • @eziiii3536
    @eziiii3536 2 месяца назад

    why they did it? bcus to many ppl cried that the F8C is to OP. same as the Ares Iion back then. they both got nerfed to hell with MM -.-

    • @El1qt
      @El1qt 2 месяца назад +1

      The F8C was wayyyyyyy to OP, and blocked behind a paywall

    • @eziiii3536
      @eziiii3536 2 месяца назад

      @@El1qt a superiority fighter is supposed to be strong AF dude. i dont like how they implemented the F8 myself. doesnt mean they have to make it trash after so many ppl bought it. its the same shit with the Ion back then and its not right bcus the light fighter elite was crying like they always do.

    • @APolishedTurd
      @APolishedTurd 23 дня назад

      @@eziiii3536The ion and ares was straight up overtuned. They are meant to fight capital ships in squads of 2 or more. Were sold us such but then out turned and outdogfighted light fighters. No lol.
      The F8C was similar. It’s not meant to be something that beats light fighters.
      It was built in the lore and in the universe as a counter to vanduul heavy ships and is a superiority fighter in the heavy fighter class.
      Changing something that is overtuned and is outperforming things it’s not supposed to isn’t a reaction to people “crying”.
      Neither was ever supposed to be as strong as either of them were.
      You can blame CIG for having a problem “accidentally” overtuning ships when they want to sell them.

  • @jones9319
    @jones9319 2 месяца назад +1

    Desync been terrible last 3-4 weeks

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад

      @@jones9319 Yeah to the point of unable to play sometimes.

  • @rodrigogodoi4250
    @rodrigogodoi4250 2 месяца назад +1

    Brain convulsion level of desync. Just awful.

  • @machoalright
    @machoalright 2 месяца назад

    First! :P

  • @epyonrsi8829
    @epyonrsi8829 2 месяца назад

    If you want the best of something you have tp produce the best of something. You don't get to be the best just because of your name. lol

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад +2

      @@epyonrsi8829 what name I am no buddy ☺️ o7

    • @epyonrsi8829
      @epyonrsi8829 2 месяца назад

      @@infinitespace239 Anvil does not produce the best just because it's name. Better engines have been produced for space exploration over the years and NASA recently has not produced the best. It is not the best because of it's name. And civilians have been producing the best rockets as of late.

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад

      @@epyonrsi8829 We will see but military has the best reasorces ☺️

    • @epyonrsi8829
      @epyonrsi8829 2 месяца назад

      @@infinitespace239 Ok look. Just because your part of the military branch does not man your the best in the world nor does it mean you produce the best military stuff. The civilian sector produces it. Military just uses it lol.

    • @infinitespace239
      @infinitespace239  2 месяца назад

      @@epyonrsi8829 Exactly ☺️