Introducing KODAK VISION3 200T Color Negative Film 5213/7213
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- The KODAK VISION3 Film family has raised the bar for high-definition capture with unrivaled highlight latitude, reduced grain in shadows, flexibility in post, and, of course, proven archival stability. Now, with the addition of KODAK VISION3 200T Color Negative Film 5213/7213, we've developed a film that performs superbly in both controlled interiors and in challenging high-contrast exteriors.
I grew up shooting film stills, and now, after working as a DP with nothing but digital motion picture and video cameras for the last 7 years, I'm ditching one of my ditcams and replacing it with an Aaton 16mm camera. I've never shot film motion, and I've always wanted to. I've decided that it's finally time to reintroduce film into the local film scene. Film's beauty just can't be beat, IMO, and I want to show others that digital doesn't HAVE to be the only answer in the modern film scene.
Find more great Kodak Motion Picture Film content on our RUclips channel, user name KODAKSHOOTFILM. See you there!
Entering the 2nd decade of the 21st Century, one might be apt to label film a dying medium. What with the advent of glorified camcorders boasting 5k resolution, combined with their ability to churn out cheap albeit muddy-looking 3-D, why would anyone bother shooting on 35mm? In reality, try as hard as they may, the actual resolution of these digital wonder cameras is in reality 2k with an added 3k of Bayer Interpolation guesstimating the remaining information. Film = 6k-10k actual resolution.
anyone know the song at the beginning? the beatboxing instrumental bit?
The problem is the postproduction... Most films have just 2k masters although we would need at least 4k resolution (it can be even more but this depends on the stock)
Vision 3 sucks honestly. It's good for photos, not so much for motion pictures.
@lightshunters Not really. People try to imitate it digitally, but I have yet to see something better than "sorta looks like it".
If you want this look you need to shoot film. And if you really want THIS look you need to shoot THIS particular film stock (5213). Don't be afraid of film, it EASIER to shoot than digital (despite what some might say) and the results speak for themselves.
@numanuma20 none. Video is video. You need a profissional movie camera por 35mm, but there are several 16mm and 8mm amateur cameras, search ebay.
what the hell!? Grain Management software!?!?!?! Isn't that part of the beauty of using film? I understand if something is really badly underexposed and your grain is dancing all over the place you might want to do something about it, but in the scene where it was used in this video, I don't understand why you would use it...Digital has been trying to be like film, and it seems film is trying to be like digital.
Of course there is. But while Red produces 4K with a 4K sensor, the F65 produces 4K with an 8K sensor. There is still some interpolation going on and the photosite to pixel ratio is not quite 3:1, but at least its far more than REDs 1:1.
I love 200T! John Gilbert, President C.A.D. (Citizens Against Digital)
Recently just shot some vision3 on my Minolta super 8 and I must say the resolution was about as good as my canon 650d which was very surprising considering it was super 8 film.
How many megapixels are those yellows, reds, greens, magentas, violets, earth, etc?
What video camera uses film ?
Not the Sony F65 though!
With RED-Cameras, yes, you are right.
Really, really nice tonality. The whole Vision3 line rocks!
06:16 Checking the gate?
For those who can afford the stock and development costs, NOTHING beats the warm look of film, and in this area, Kodak continues to be the platinum standard. Naturally, great optics and talented cinematographers help make these images as beautiful as they are. Even so, the great advances in digital cameras have made excellent image quality accessible to budget filmmakers, and will continue to improve. But as the saying goes: "The last of the old beats the first of the new."