Is an animal expanding its range a bad thing?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 мар 2024
- Is Climate change always a bad thing? (Reaction to Animalogic)
Climate change and manmade climate change is 100% real. But that doesn't mean everything that happens due to it is a bad thing. But is an animal extending its range due to better conditions for it a bad thing? Or just the natural progress? 
Развлечения
One massive reason tick populations are so out of control is because we don't do controlled burns all across the east like the native Americans did
Polar bears have really just started adapting to it, i think it shows the natural order will almost always adapt
The way that you explain this makes complete and 100% sense. I think your knowledge is guiding you very well. Your education and schooling will definitely lead you to teach and guide your channel in such a positive light.
You find this out competing thing a lot with plants. Some very rare plants would prefer to live in ideal soil, but because they get outcompeted by more common plants they obly end up surviving in poorer soil that they can tolerate
Nice discussion, you made some excellent points from the information you learned 🙂👍
Up until a few years ago i had never seen a dear tick. They've since exploded in population in MN and i now find several each year. I've already found 2 this winter... they're not even supposed to be active for a couple months but we've had a freakishly, and i mean freakishly warm winter with almost no snowfall all season.
We didn't have armadillo here in Ga until 6 or 7 years ago. Now they're everywhere
We just kind of want to put Earth in suspended animation and keep it the way it is, the ultimate moral question would be what if climate change and global warming now was just all natural, and all of these animals are just going to go extinct. At that point do we actually get involved? Or do we just let nature take its course. And the truth is humans are just doing whatever animals done before us exploit our environment to the point that we're either number one or we're out competed buy something else. We're just the first thing smart enough to put that together
I think the main point is not to stop the change of the climate itself, but to slow it down so that the majority of living beings can adapt to it, instead of just allowing the sped up climate change humans caused wipe out species around the globe
Interesting vid!
Nice video dude
Oh also don't forget the first organisms could not breath oxygen. Then the oxygen nearly killed off all the first living organisms that were anaerobic. Like it's a miracle the oxygen didn't kill off all the first life forms. Overall yiu have not said one thing I disagree with. I agree. I feel animal logic has the right idea about climate change being a problem but the real problem is the animals out competing.
We're at the end of an ice age. And what about the comets? Or the volcanoes? Pollution is bad.
What are we going to do when the billions of lbs of salt we dump on icy roads eventually destroys all our ecosystems that rely on fresh water?
Do something about it. Don't just whinge
@@jasonotto9126dude really?
@@gazepskotzs4 yeah
There's actually more salt in the earth than there is at sea.
I agree.
I was just kinda saying that. Pollution is not good. But i think a warmer, slightly wetter climate may be better. Winters are hard on everything. Polar bears and browns are mixing. They know what's coming. This ain't nothing new. Opec is awful andcso is palm farming.
Yes ticks going extint would be a net positive for every other animal on the planet full stop
They play a vital role like everything else
we r animals we r evolving to just like. what the video says maybe us changing the climate should be consider a natural thing its just part the natural cycle as we evolve
people say we r cause a rapid climate change could be right maybe think. its just a natural cycle some animals maybe be able to adapt some not natural process been happening over millions of years. just food for thought