Yes really good, especially with 2 tons. Well I love it, it's really good to finally try a "real engine" and not a hybrid. The engine is really smooth, running mostly under 1600 rpm. It's also pretty quite but with a lovely sound and despite being a 3.3, it love to go all the way to the 5k rpm. And the very low fuel consumption is a big plus.
@@LMcars btw how do you get to drive all those cars, you rent them? That mazda is stunning, really love rwd and straight 6 engine. I found that D200 should weigh up to 1900kg so 8.4s is great. I would even love to own mazda 3 122G in manual.
More reliable, you ask less to engine for the same effort as a lower size engine. And fuel consumption is as low as the 2.0, maybe even lower. They just detuned the 254 hp version, no need to switch with the 2.2 twin turbo.
@@LMcars More reliable... remains to be seen with its old brother never really fixed (excessive oil dilution and numerous fatal failures due to metallic particles oil contamination, which Mazda attributed to a nearly impossible industrial issue, for which an erroneous diagnostic may have arised from the former issue, with oil becoming too fluid to prevent cams wear). At least, with these 2 more cylinders there shouldn't be any flywheel torque dampening issue.
love this beast, ours is coming the next week hopefully :)
wow congratulations !! If I had the money that's what I would buy. Inline 6 254hp ?
@@LMcars The same that you´ve been tested, D200. I don´t really like the AWD version. :)
@@nyariszabolcs6725 great choice! 200 is plenty enough. You will be pleased with the low fuel consumption. Enjoy your new ride :)
Subscribed thanks for using timing them with a gps , real numbers 👍🏻
Take you very much mate ! I try as much as possible to use it every time I try a car.
@@LMcars cool that's the spirit , Its my hobby too so far I have timed 28 cars , I have Qstarz-lt6000s GPS device.
@@dontjivewitha5559 good choice!!
Wow not bad for 200hp version, how did the engine feel?
Yes really good, especially with 2 tons. Well I love it, it's really good to finally try a "real engine" and not a hybrid. The engine is really smooth, running mostly under 1600 rpm. It's also pretty quite but with a lovely sound and despite being a 3.3, it love to go all the way to the 5k rpm. And the very low fuel consumption is a big plus.
@@LMcars btw how do you get to drive all those cars, you rent them? That mazda is stunning, really love rwd and straight 6 engine. I found that D200 should weigh up to 1900kg so 8.4s is great. I would even love to own mazda 3 122G in manual.
This is petrol or diesel?
Diesel, the new 3.3 litre in-line 6. The 200 hp version.
0:02 omg that lag lmao
It's useless to use a 6-cylinder engine but only emits power like the Ranger 2.0 ecoblue
More reliable, you ask less to engine for the same effort as a lower size engine. And fuel consumption is as low as the 2.0, maybe even lower. They just detuned the 254 hp version, no need to switch with the 2.2 twin turbo.
@@LMcars More reliable... remains to be seen with its old brother never really fixed (excessive oil dilution and numerous fatal failures due to metallic particles oil contamination, which Mazda attributed to a nearly impossible industrial issue, for which an erroneous diagnostic may have arised from the former issue, with oil becoming too fluid to prevent cams wear).
At least, with these 2 more cylinders there shouldn't be any flywheel torque dampening issue.
@@jmc8583 totally right. I mean by more reliable compared to a smaller engine with the same power output.
@@jmc8583 Those issue where resolved tho, you are just uninformed.