10 Watches That Shaped The World

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 298

  • @wristaction
    @wristaction  5 лет назад +28

    Correction: Alexander Litvinenko was poisoned by polonium-210

    • @koyotekola6916
      @koyotekola6916 4 года назад +2

      They believe Yasser Arafat also was poisoned by Po-210. Now who in the world would want to poison Yasser Arafat, especially with a rare non-halal substance?

    • @lowersaxon
      @lowersaxon 4 года назад

      Koyote Kola Putin?

    • @MrTchou
      @MrTchou 3 года назад

      Mossad

    • @tomjones2121
      @tomjones2121 2 года назад

      swatch watches ? LOL what a joke man , and you left out one of the most significant watch brands ever , Timex , oh yeah , you also forgot one the the best time pieces ever made The Ball pocket watch , the pocket watch that changed the U.S rail system for ever . you also showed an Omega moon watch that was made in Switzerland , so not a NASA watch . U.S Astronauts wore the American watch , know the difference ? apparently not , Moon watch worn by NASA men said ( tachometer , not tachymetre , it was a U.S watch ... american made in Ohio.. mr expert LOL

  • @rodneyzvolanek5193
    @rodneyzvolanek5193 6 лет назад +38

    I think Bulova was missing in your list. Accutron was revolutionary back then. The gemini and Apolo mission used bulova watch.

    • @fslater102
      @fslater102 4 года назад +2

      If you hadn't said it I would have... WHERE'S THE 214????

    • @cedricduyongco
      @cedricduyongco 4 года назад +4

      Yes. Bulova is an important part of horological history. Especially with their tuning fork technology which was kind of a precursor to the quartz. I think this was a big thing to miss in the list. I also feel that the Seiko (although mentioned in passing) should have been more important than the GP as being the first quartz watch in commercial production.

    • @pickles632
      @pickles632 3 года назад

      and they had the very first commercial ever.

  • @marcroche9324
    @marcroche9324 4 года назад +8

    You must be too young to remember the Bulova Accutron.
    An engineering marvel. The tuning fork design that did away
    With the centuries old balance wheel movement.

  • @monkeytennislee2493
    @monkeytennislee2493 5 лет назад +59

    We’re was the Casio calculator watch??? First watch to help us cheat maths exams

    • @LazyJacques
      @LazyJacques 5 лет назад +2

      True! The Casio Data Bank makes a cameo appearance in the digital lineup at 15:00... I would've killed for a Hughes LED Compu Chron, even though I didn't know what it was at the time. It was the watch worn by Lorne Greene in the Battlestar Galactica TV show of the late 70s. Be careful what you wish for: my parents gave me a Texas Instruments LED watch that Christmas, and I was crushed to discover the thing was useless in daylight!

    • @banquo60615
      @banquo60615 4 года назад +1

      What did you use to use to help you cheat on spelling exams?

    • @monkeytennislee2493
      @monkeytennislee2493 4 года назад +1

      banquo60615 used ye ma she give me some “private’s”

  • @konstantin6949
    @konstantin6949 5 лет назад +7

    Don't confuse "Russian" and "Soviet" words, they have different meanings. Shturmanskie (Штурманские) is the Soviet watch series.

  • @Lex5576
    @Lex5576 6 лет назад +13

    The Sturmanskie was most certainly the watch Gagarin wore in space. He can be seen wearing it in many pictures before and after the first launch. Sturmanskie and Vostok both have been known for years as watches built like a tank. Ruggedness and reliability are two essential Russian qualities in industrial design.

  • @marcdecock7946
    @marcdecock7946 5 лет назад +10

    I own a Sturmanskie … so I like to think it was the actual first watch in space… why not, Yuri Gagarin was not supposed to do anything but just sit there and look around, so they probably didn't question him wearing his watch… I like the idea that he looked at the same brand-icon when he was sitting on top of that rocket in the 60's waiting for the countdown...

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад +3

      Gagarin was indeed a brave guy. He had little or no control over his craft. There were also allegedly several failed attempts before him.

    • @marcdecock7946
      @marcdecock7946 5 лет назад +2

      @@wristaction what i like about gagarin... all the other candidates for the job of being the first man in space agreed that he should be the one... he seems to have been very amiable...
      I read somewhere that he called himself the last monkey in space... because he had no controls... he was just a passenger.

  • @adamlamar101
    @adamlamar101 6 лет назад +13

    Great review, but shame there was no room for Casio's GShock. Which is not my favorite, but it's the most popular for field, police, military, fire and even space exploration

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  6 лет назад +2

      Good point, I heard that Nasa even use G shock for missions.

    • @elbello1975
      @elbello1975 5 лет назад

      Just check the coments my friend

    • @Jamesfoofighter
      @Jamesfoofighter 4 года назад

      @@wristaction they lessened the requirements for space watches. Astronauts probably like g shocks toughness and less maintenance than a mechanical

  • @paulcampbell2764
    @paulcampbell2764 4 года назад +3

    Bulova accutron not on there or the speedmaster moonwatch that was worn on the first moon landing, seems a few have been missed

  • @DocWat280
    @DocWat280 4 года назад +5

    You missed Bulova. The watch that actually worked on a space mission. The crystal didn't pop out like the Omega did.

  • @davidsparling3505
    @davidsparling3505 7 лет назад +10

    Bulova Accutron not even metioned...unbelievable!

  • @e28forever30
    @e28forever30 2 года назад +7

    I am glad Casio is mentioned here, as they truly made digital watches attainable for everybody.
    They are a great company, they have their place in horology.
    Proudly wearing my GMW-B5000, a true icon.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  2 года назад

      Absolutely. Most people's entry into watch collecting will be through a Casio, and Casio continues to make desirable and attainable watches today. Appreciate your comment!

  • @brianfuller7691
    @brianfuller7691 5 лет назад +2

    All of these timepieces were iconic but the H4 merits a special place.

  • @accutronitisthe2nd95
    @accutronitisthe2nd95 5 лет назад +6

    Of course, you missed the Bulova Accutron tuning fork watch that dominated from 1960 up to 1976 when Quartz watches took over, The Accutron tuning fork movement was far more accurate than any balance wheel watch and Bulova sold millions of them worldwide!!!

  • @jefferyneu3915
    @jefferyneu3915 7 лет назад +2

    Very informative and thoughtful video. Others say the Omega SMP 2531.80 was the watch that saved Omega. James Bond turned out to be the ideal advertising icon. That said, that is thinking only of one brand name. I believe you have done an excellent job identifying watches that changed the world! Thank you!

  • @MirceaD28
    @MirceaD28 6 лет назад +23

    Sturmanskie is a good watch. Most Russian watches are. I have the same caliber and is very accurate.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  6 лет назад +4

      I've not had much experience with Russian watches, but I love the look of old Vostok watches.

    • @koyotekola6916
      @koyotekola6916 4 года назад +5

      Why isn't Sturmanskie competing on the world watch market?

    • @cedricduyongco
      @cedricduyongco 4 года назад

      Russian watches are often overlooked or even looked down on. Such a pity since their watch are so sturdy, have anti shock resistance (even in their older movements). They did some wonderful innovations back in the days but have actually stagnated in their innovations. Still good solid watches.

    • @mrsentencename7334
      @mrsentencename7334 Год назад +1

      @@cedricduyongco I have 3 Vostoks and they are great

  • @jamesfreeman7954
    @jamesfreeman7954 7 лет назад +7

    Very informative. I watched the full 17 minutes. Thank you for your hard work.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад +1

      Thanks James. Glad you stuck around till the end.

    • @dustytangerine
      @dustytangerine 7 лет назад

      After reading your comment James, I had to check how long the video was as I had just watched it all. Thank you both! :-)

  • @DaOneJoel
    @DaOneJoel 7 лет назад +2

    Neat mate, subscribed!
    This was enjoyable, and even a nerd like me learned a few new things, great content, and lovely presentation.

  • @miikanieminen6514
    @miikanieminen6514 7 лет назад +1

    Very nice and informative video! Learned a lot.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад

      Hi Miika, I appreciate the comment and thanks for watching.

  • @jashoo8597
    @jashoo8597 7 лет назад +2

    Totally agree with no 1. Without swatch, we will not be talking about mechanical watches today

  • @G58
    @G58 4 года назад

    The big question with Gagarin is not which watch he wore, but whether he actually went into space at all.
    He was chosen because he was good PR. He was paraded around BEFORE, as well as of course after the flight. Given how unpredictable the entire space thing was at the time, it was very risky actually sending the poster boy.
    It’s highly likely someone else actually did the mission touted as the first manned space flight.
    This begs two more questions:
    Was that mission actually successful - to the extent that the real cosmonaut survived?
    Who was he?

  • @bruchett4799
    @bruchett4799 2 года назад

    Thank you for being so quick and informative! Amazing video.
    Personally, when there is too much animation/music on presentations it distracts me, this was perfect.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  2 года назад

      Appreciate the nice comment, and thank you for watching.

  • @mamusto10
    @mamusto10 4 года назад +4

    Glycine Airman? First GMT watch!

  • @favoritethings3065
    @favoritethings3065 Год назад

    Great video…I appreciate all the research you put into your content?😊

  • @TheKozlow
    @TheKozlow 7 лет назад +2

    rolex movement used in panerai has been originally a cortebert movement... and first dive was omega ;-)

  • @Davitamon76
    @Davitamon76 7 лет назад +3

    Great video! You deserve more subscribers, so I subscribed...;)

  • @jochem1986
    @jochem1986 5 лет назад +2

    I live in Biel, the absolute heart of the Swiss watch industry. I love what you’re teaching me about my new home town!

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад +1

      Thanks for watching & commenting Jochem. I appreciate it, you made my day!

    • @MiBfinity
      @MiBfinity 5 лет назад +1

      Na denn, Gruess us Lyss. :)

  • @lehtosneva9512
    @lehtosneva9512 7 лет назад +1

    Great and very informative video!

  • @john-carlosynostroza
    @john-carlosynostroza 4 года назад +1

    Nice job!

  • @yellownp22541
    @yellownp22541 7 лет назад

    Outstanding video! Keep up the great work.

  • @thermionic1234567
    @thermionic1234567 7 лет назад +48

    The poison was polonium, not radium.

    • @hugoabrantes4823
      @hugoabrantes4823 7 лет назад +2

      Jeffrey Morrissey i think it is really radium..... i don't think polonium was part of it.

    • @Michael-4
      @Michael-4 7 лет назад +1

      www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/58088.php

    • @michaelwilson4638
      @michaelwilson4638 7 лет назад +1

      radium

    • @calt2161
      @calt2161 7 лет назад +5

      He's talking about what poisoned the Russian, not what was poisonous in the watches. The Russian was not poisoned by radium. He was poisoned by Polonium.

    • @koyotekola6916
      @koyotekola6916 4 года назад

      @@calt2161 Correct. If the girls were anywhere close to polonium, they would have died within weeks.

  • @ednammansfield8553
    @ednammansfield8553 7 лет назад

    Great informative video. I own several watches from Citizen Eco Drive to Seiko and Casio. I also like Orient watches and own one of their 3 star mechanical watches after viewing several reviews on them and have found them to be very rugged but also accurate mechanical watches, they also produce Solar Powered quartz chronographs which are also very accurate of which I own two of them in the Neo 70's Panda range produced for the Japanese market but are available in the UK if purchased online. Orient are not well known in the UK but they are now owned by Seiko so you can expect good quality timepieces. Thankyou for posting your video. I have now subscribed to your channel. Keep up the good work.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад

      Thanks Ednam. I agree with you about Orient, they make excellent watches. Shame they aren't more widely available in the UK. I looked up the Neo Panda and wow, what a nice looking watch!

  • @davidsuzukiispolpot
    @davidsuzukiispolpot 7 лет назад +5

    Slight detail - I don't think that modern quarts oscillators are at 32768Hz. I think they run slightly higher and use an individually digital programmed counter to remove some counts based upon calibration. That way, in mass production, the frequency could be measured and a digital compensation burned or permanently programmed into a counter to calibrate them instantly after measuring the frequency of the oscillator.

    • @AuralVirus
      @AuralVirus 7 лет назад +1

      The frequency at which the crystal oscillates depends on its shape, size, and the crystal plane on which the quartz is cut. The positions at which electrodes are placed can slightly change the tuning, as well. If the crystal is accurately shaped and positioned, it will oscillate at a desired frequency. In nearly all quartz watches, the frequency is 32,768 Hz,[1] and the crystal is cut in a small tuning fork shape on a particular crystal plane. This frequency is a power of two (32,768 = 215), just high enough so most people cannot hear it, yet low enough to permit inexpensive counters to derive a 1-second pulse. A 15-bit binary digital counter driven by the frequency will overflow once per second, creating a digital pulse once per second. The pulse-per-second output can be used to drive many kinds of clocks.

    • @bennylofgren3208
      @bennylofgren3208 7 лет назад +2

      Turk If you copy text from Wikipedia you should note the source. And remove references that you are not including (the [1]). Also, you have lost some of the text attributes. 32,768 does not equal 215 obviously, but two to the power of fifteen (2^15).

    • @AuralVirus
      @AuralVirus 7 лет назад

      I should, should I? LOL

    • @davidsuzukiispolpot
      @davidsuzukiispolpot 7 лет назад +1

      Thank you for your reply. You are describing a standard crystal watch movement. They were much more accurate than any other self-contained timing method that could be reasonably placed on a wrist-watch. (Edited previous three sentences)
      However, my current Casio MDV106 lost 3 seconds in 6 months. That is 0.2ppm error. Crystal oscillators can not reasonably be made that accurate just by manufacturing. (mine was not a one-off fluke)
      Analog calibration could not be made for a watch that is $60 with that accuracy. (there could be some slight tuning adjustment with capacitance but that would be an expensive calibration).
      For the most effective calibration crystal oscillator, it would be necessary to digitally compensate by a tiny amount.
      When the early digital movements were made, the counters had to be divide-by-two flip-flops because transistors were expensive so the crystal was a power of 2 to be able to generate second time-base.
      Now, all you have to do is make the crystal a tiny bit fast, and then use a different counter to subtract a certain number of counts once-in-a-while. That extra counter would not be a divide-by-two counter.

    • @bennylofgren3208
      @bennylofgren3208 7 лет назад

      Turk If you don't want to come across as a plagiarizing moron, yes. One that aren't able to proof-read his own stolen content at that, and thus introduces stupid errors.

  • @justkeepingthetime1039
    @justkeepingthetime1039 5 лет назад +1

    Thanks for sharing this historical information. Love hearing background on some famous horology.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад

      Thanks for watching & commenting - appreciate it.

  • @hifispec01
    @hifispec01 7 лет назад

    Interesting video, thanks. May I suggest the use of a pop filter or windscreen on your microphone to furter enhance your sound? Good luck!

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад

      thanks for the suggestions - apreciate it

  • @tomepavleski9382
    @tomepavleski9382 6 лет назад +4

    Sturmanskie honoured, bravo ! I would only add the first watch in outer space , Strela, handwound chronograph.

  • @MultiCraftTube
    @MultiCraftTube 7 лет назад +4

    Really nice video! Not a single second bored ;D

  • @alanpawson2039
    @alanpawson2039 7 лет назад

    Very very interesting. Answered lots of questions. Thanks

  • @edteach3r
    @edteach3r 5 лет назад

    Great video, thank you.

  • @jonabitstream
    @jonabitstream 4 года назад +1

    Thank you so much for including quartz.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  4 года назад +2

      Agree, 99% of watch channels only talk about mechanical analogue watches.

  • @vforvictor3320
    @vforvictor3320 5 лет назад +5

    Your telling me the Omega isn't in the top ten madness my friend

    • @elbello1975
      @elbello1975 5 лет назад

      Watch the coments and tell me??

  • @klauswhitedreamer
    @klauswhitedreamer 4 года назад

    Very interesting and informative, thank you, great video !

  • @torgeirbjelland7078
    @torgeirbjelland7078 7 лет назад +9

    Great video!

  • @Velofil
    @Velofil 2 года назад

    Great Video, but at 10:01 this is Valentina Tereshkov the first woman in space, she wore the same watch like Juri Gagarin

  • @sandydenny4ever164
    @sandydenny4ever164 7 лет назад

    No 1 Harrington, saved countless lives in the age of sail. No 2 Blancpain 50 fathoms, so you don't run out of oxygen in the depth's, as well as being drop dead gorgeous and hand finished still today.

  • @104thDIVTimberwolf
    @104thDIVTimberwolf 5 лет назад +2

    Your watch info was good, but you missed the mark pretty badly on other points. Santo-Dumont's 14bis did use wheels, for sure, but as of 1908, no European had flown more than 7 minutes in a heavier-than-air craft, while the Wrights were flying an hour or more and no European was able to control and aircraft in the yaw or roll axes, so they had no true control of their planes. They were still attempting to control their turns with just the rudder and very few had anywhere near enough vertical stabilization.
    Also, Litvinenko was killed with polonium, not radium. Polonium is second only to uranium hexaflouride in toxicity. Radium does kill, but over several years. Marie Curie died from it, over a 15 year period.
    You also forgot the invention of the Swiss lever escapement by Thomas Mudge, which almost all modern mechanical watches have used since the 1870s, or the Gruen's safety pinion, which prevented a failed main spring from completely destroying the movement.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад

      Thanks for the comment Timberwolf

  • @FitOutPost
    @FitOutPost 6 лет назад

    Great educational video! Thanks for all your efforts.

  • @mariosiaven2965
    @mariosiaven2965 6 лет назад +1

    I had a black resin Texas Instruments red digits digital watch in 1977 when I was a kid, what an awesome feat of a watch it was back then.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  6 лет назад

      That's awesome Mario. I'm guessing that it was one with an LED display and that you had to press a button to show the time?

  • @blindriv3r
    @blindriv3r 5 лет назад

    Nice video, thanks....yes I think the Sturmanskie you have featured is pretty widely accepted as the type Gagarin used

  • @g30rg3-c5
    @g30rg3-c5 7 лет назад

    Great work, well done, cheers

  • @schweizererfolg
    @schweizererfolg 7 лет назад

    Great video with some surprises. Thanks for sharing!

  • @paulhanson6008
    @paulhanson6008 7 лет назад

    Enjoyed your informative video.

  • @Audittr2108
    @Audittr2108 7 лет назад

    Very informative!

  • @dream_emulator
    @dream_emulator 7 лет назад

    Cool video!

  • @ericmal5055
    @ericmal5055 5 лет назад

    Great program. I agree with your selection.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  4 года назад

      Thanks for watching & commenting Eric.

  • @jfilm7466
    @jfilm7466 3 года назад

    Del Boy and Rodney had one of #10. Lovely Jubbly!

  • @0017Bulldog
    @0017Bulldog 7 лет назад

    That was an awesome ride my friend.

  • @laurenceharrison661
    @laurenceharrison661 5 лет назад

    Thoroughly enjoyed that. Thanks

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад

      Thanks for watching & commenting Laurence. You made my day!

  • @arturocerecero8118
    @arturocerecero8118 7 лет назад

    A lot of information, tnks and regards!

  • @skeelo69
    @skeelo69 Год назад

    Why did you show a picture of cosmonaut Valentina Tereshkova when talking about Yuri Gagarin ?.

  • @badimaani
    @badimaani 5 лет назад

    I dont know much about watches... but i know that You are gooood. Thanks

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад +1

      Thanks for watching Badi and I appreciate you commenting. As if my head wasn't big enough!

  • @nicholasshade2418
    @nicholasshade2418 4 года назад

    I love watches. I love the fact they brought up Napoleon sister in this.💚

  • @KRW628
    @KRW628 7 лет назад

    very interesting. thank you!

    • @KRW628
      @KRW628 5 лет назад

      I forgot to mention, I've still got my 1977 Pulsar P3. It's in the box. Haven't worn it for 36 years.

  • @neutronalchemist3241
    @neutronalchemist3241 7 лет назад

    Litvinenko had been killed with Polonium, not Radium. BTW both Gagarin's Sturmanskie and the Speedmaster moonwatches still had radium indexes (in case of Gagarin's watch, cause it was an old piece. Soviet Union already forbidden the use of radium indexes in new watches in 1957, and newer ones used tritium).

  • @davidcoleman2463
    @davidcoleman2463 5 лет назад

    Good video . Most people do not know a thing about the quartz crisis .

  • @jamessantana2071
    @jamessantana2071 7 лет назад +3

    "ALL" PILOTS WEAR A WATCH ... Common sense tells us the first Russian in space wore a watch, however its condition on its return no one knows ... but it took Omega with the Speedmaster to market & publicize it to Make More Money, something Russians are Not good at ... Don't forget Ingersol's DOLLAR WATCH in the 1900's which made a $ 1.00 watch affordable to countless Americans, & their Popular Mickey Mouse watches thereafter. GREAT REVIEW, Thanks, Major Jim, USMC

    • @neutronalchemist3241
      @neutronalchemist3241 7 лет назад

      All the watches that participated to the western's part of the space race tried to profit from it (with probably the only exception being Heuer, John Glenn's watch in his first orbit). Breitling, Bulova... Omega was the most successful one cause it had been officially selected.

  • @itsallrobbish
    @itsallrobbish 5 лет назад

    A great article.

  • @oscargustavoarcosruiz8793
    @oscargustavoarcosruiz8793 7 лет назад +4

    So only 539 subscribers?
    You deserve many more!

  • @EAG369
    @EAG369 4 года назад

    If folks want to know more about the impact of radium on dial painters, check out Moore's The Radium Girls. It's a thorough, excellent, and depressing read.

  • @katahajimeudegarame2397
    @katahajimeudegarame2397 4 года назад

    I just aquired a military CYMA Tavannes watch with black display and triangular 12´ index with dots ( B-Uhren type-a inspired ) 36 mm diam. and in very wearable condition (military steampunk kinda vibe) without noticible restoration except the crown wich i suspect it was replaced for civilian use (aviation watches have large unconfortable crowns), i thinck i found a history jewel for 165 buckaroos, what do you think?

  • @PROWATCHES
    @PROWATCHES 5 лет назад

    This is great!

  • @michaelborneman971
    @michaelborneman971 7 лет назад +5

    I'd say the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak should be there as it saved the mechanical watch industry (at least in part).

  • @aragongon
    @aragongon 6 лет назад +12

    It is all about Swiss watches. G shock should be one of it.

  • @tanyasejarah8615
    @tanyasejarah8615 6 лет назад +1

    Hallo... nice video...

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 Год назад

    never knew about the 1926 rolex oyster being the first waterproof watch

  • @heinerklaus8905
    @heinerklaus8905 5 лет назад

    As 11 I would suggest to take Balls Standard Time watch. It contributed to the safety of the new railways in the 19th century. The watch ist still produced

  • @ramseysthebull
    @ramseysthebull 7 лет назад +28

    bulova accutron

    • @neutronalchemist3241
      @neutronalchemist3241 7 лет назад +2

      They advertised it a lot actually, both for being the watches used in scientific apparatus on satellites and on the Moon, and for being the wirstwatches of many astronauts. Curiously however, the advertising was mainly focused on the "Astronaut" model (used in many pre-Apollo missions) and not on the "Lunar Pilot" (that Dave Scott used in his third EVA on the Moon after his Speedmaster's crystal pop off).

  • @kosflorin
    @kosflorin 5 лет назад

    Panerai watches have massive history

    • @poulwinther
      @poulwinther 5 лет назад

      Even so; I find them ghastly. They look like cheap kitchen clocks to me, lol.

  • @tingwcb
    @tingwcb 3 года назад

    Seiko 6139 or Pogue. The first AUTOMATIC chronograph in space. Omega was a manual chronograph

  • @tayyabpirzada146
    @tayyabpirzada146 7 лет назад +2

    Fascinating video

  • @solarisis
    @solarisis 5 лет назад

    Casio should have had a slot somewhere, with the development of gravitational shock watches, nothing existed like it before the g-shocks came to market.

    • @e28forever30
      @e28forever30 2 года назад

      Casio is mentioned, but not G-Shock specifically.

  • @christophergan71
    @christophergan71 5 лет назад +2

    Omega speed master spent million of dollars to develop it? It wasn't developed for space travel.

  • @KatieGeorgieva
    @KatieGeorgieva 2 года назад

    Not a word about Peter Petroff, the inventor of modern watches (Pulsar) :)

  • @mannysingh6618
    @mannysingh6618 7 лет назад

    very good

  • @MIGHTYcbu
    @MIGHTYcbu 7 лет назад

    Nice and very informative video, too bad the sound is awful, which makes it hard to enjoy

  • @sudylo6852
    @sudylo6852 7 лет назад +8

    Seriously no japan watches on this list? Japan watches cause the quartz crisis and now every people can have watches because of japan watches, that truly shape the world. And they also produce many hi tech and good quality watches.

    • @nemeninemeni
      @nemeninemeni 6 лет назад

      Seiko Astron :) Content creator is a fucking Swiss snob

    • @johnpinner1
      @johnpinner1 5 лет назад

      wrong GP did which is a swiss company

    • @lowersaxon
      @lowersaxon 4 года назад

      He named Seiko and Casio.

  • @hugoabrantes4823
    @hugoabrantes4823 7 лет назад

    I do believe gagarine, took that watch to espace. I think that he only had that one. And the soviet focus was the space run, not testing things..... and personal objects.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад

      He was a brave fella all right. He had to eject his craft before it crashed to earth because it was not
      capable of landing, so he had to time his exit just right.

  • @mdunawaym
    @mdunawaym 5 лет назад

    I would add India's HMT watches. They made watches affordable for India's people of most income levels, and have become a subculture of their own.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  5 лет назад

      In that case, have you seen my tribute to HMT?
      ruclips.net/video/jMdDcfhDTIg/видео.html

  • @drnick40
    @drnick40 2 месяца назад

    Two big one missing. The Submariner and the Speedmaster.

  • @321-Gone
    @321-Gone 7 месяцев назад

    I had an all white swatch back in the 80s. It was rad. Looked like disco dust.

  • @rileyperez277
    @rileyperez277 7 лет назад

    Riley Perez wore the submariner watch in interview

  • @jeremyfine1464
    @jeremyfine1464 7 лет назад

    Subbed. Now yer 4 digits. So what about Timex the only watch anyone had in the 60's 'Takes a lickin' & keeps on tickin'.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  7 лет назад

      Thanks Jeremy. Agreed, Timex makes great watches

  • @hansobermann4871
    @hansobermann4871 4 года назад

    I do like the Steinhart ocean 1 very much

  • @sharathramachandran
    @sharathramachandran 3 года назад

    What is that sax song?

  • @karim271
    @karim271 6 лет назад +1

    WHERE IS THE WATCH THAT CHRISTOPHER WALKEN IN PULP FICTION GAVE TO THE LITTLE MAN BRUCE WILLIS ???

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  6 лет назад +1

      lol. Maybe he put it back into it's hiding place.

  • @grantgre
    @grantgre 7 лет назад

    Yes polonium was used to kill the Russian spy not radium but the rest of your comments about radium were correct.

  • @clintwalker5804
    @clintwalker5804 6 лет назад

    I bet I had 10 plus Swiss watches. Crazy

  • @davids9549
    @davids9549 5 лет назад

    Although you'd have a job getting it on your wrist, I'd perhaps start with the 15th century clock in Salisbury Cathedral.

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  4 года назад

      Great feat of mechanical engineering that one.

  • @bigbearddahuzi1036
    @bigbearddahuzi1036 6 лет назад +1

    You left off the Bell watches... and ignored/disdained the Japanese contributions. Only the European watches (Swiss) got any love. Still, this was a very interesting video. Good job

    • @wristaction
      @wristaction  6 лет назад

      Thanks for watching. Yeah the Seiko Ariston was the only Japanese watch on the list, and it helped to push things along in watch technology terms.

  • @maxinahunt8652
    @maxinahunt8652 11 месяцев назад

    Wow. Little did I know…..