Motion smoothing talk begins at 17:23 I agree for the most part. It just brings that weird soap-opera look to film. That's just not something you want when you're watching Goodfellas or Saving Private Ryan. For sports it actually enhances the experience because you can follow the action more closely. For animation it's equally weird as film. It manages to give even Rick & Morty a soap opera look, which is just too damn weird. There are older anime that have been meticulously animated frame by frame to give a beautifully timed motion blur & illusion of speed that is just annihilated by motion-flow ( Sony's trademark ). The classics from FLCL to Cowboy Bebop are just ruined by it.
It makes Star Wars and Bladerunner look like old Doctor Who. The old Doctor Who was awesome, but definitely not beautiful to look at. Smoothing makes the best practical effects ever done, look like absolute crap.
Ming Mongo - Yes!! I have always personally likened it to makes cinema look like a BBC series. The frame rate of cinema is a huuuge component to the vibe of a film; one must craft the direction of a shoot, whether it’s tv or cinema, to match the presentation medium. TV settings out of the box butcher everything
24 frames per second was set because of technical limitations at the invention of film, plus its the minimum required for the illusion of motion. The idea that this is the "optimal" frame rate is ridiculous. Old movies didn't have cameras that moved at lot. Using 24 fps on modern fast moving movies is just stupid. The reality is eventually all movies will be filmed at 48 fps (or higher) just like almost all movies are filmed on video now. Motion smoothing is the only way I can watch modern movies without them looking like crap.
In my experience, the digital codes included in Blu-ray combo packs don't actually expire on their expiration date, or seemingly ever. Just this year I've been able to successfully redeem dozens of movies with 'expired' codes, going back quite a few years.
The main problem with motion smoothing isn't it making a smoother image, most directors don't shoot 24fps because they wanted to, but because that's what film was. The main problem with motion smoothing is the weird "wave" that happens on the border between, static and moving parts of the image. Especially visible car scenes for example, where they film the side windows and the card is still and the background is scrolling by.
I don't really have time to watch this today, but I'm going to add this to my "watch later" list. I just came here to say YES to the title. There are always artifacts, and it can push the effective shutter angle beyond 360 degrees. It gives it the look of those older video cameras that needed a while after seeing something bright before the remnants of those highlights fade.
Film licensing is frustrating. If you buy a disk, it has a load of protection on it to stop you using it how it suits you and it has an annoying person telling you how bad piracy is. If you "buy" a film from a streaming service it can randomly disappear. If you want to be able to stream every film that's released then you have to subscribe to multiple competing streaming services. So it's far, far easier to pirate things. No irritating anti piracy advert (ironic really), no worries about the film randomly expiring, you just enjoy it in a way that suits you. Steam made buying games easier than pirating games. Why can't films be the same?
Thank you for saying the word that means why tv looks so weird to me on some people tvs. I didn't know motion smoothing was a thing, but it makes so much more sense to me now! My tvs don't do it. As a classically trained photographer (bachelors degree at the time of conversion to digital photo) it has been driving me nuts not knowing what to call why the tvs kept looking weird to me.
about motion smoothing... as an artist and game designer, i cant control in this day and age what kind of display my stuff is shown on. ive got two displays at home that have two differant colour schemes, even after calibration. in the digital age where everyone can see what they want on tv or pc, you just have to accept that your original creation is going to be transformed by the medium. also as a father, with a steady job i dont have time to go to the cinema. and movies dont stay in theaters forever, they live on on tv and streaming. so if im a cinematographer i would like to have my film be only in cinema, but its not gonna last.
Anyone else think the 'mid roll' ad is way too long? When watching monetised videos, I'll often let front roll ads run, but mid roll ads I will always skip because it interrupts the flow of whatever I'm watching. That, obviously, isn't an option here. Neither is me getting a tested premium membership right now as I barely have enough to pay my bills and buy food. But that mid roll ad is putting me off the podcast. Not enough to stop watching yet, but it could one day if they stay, especially if they stay as long as they are.
Agreed. The minute + ad just threw me out of the podcast listening mood. The front Monetised ad has been on here for awhile and I've certainly look at some products I otherwise might not have if not presented here. Now I feel like I need to avoid this Logan story just because of the interruption.
Finally confirmation that I'm not insane... Have complained about motion smoothing so much when visiting friends and family and seeing it on their televisions and then having them say they don't see it. Felt like I was taking crazy pills.
Quinton Lennox why complained, we love ours, most and people always comment how much better it looks than theirs, my favorite thing is “it’s like it’s 3D” I’m trying to understand the logic of disliking it because you complainers are probably gonna end up getting the option yanked off of new TVs and we love it! If you dislike it you can just turn it off in the menu.
Bluray and HD ruined the original Ghostbusters for me. You can tell that the final, rooftop battle was shot on a sound stage, and you can see the 4x8 sheets of plywood on the ground that were painted black and a piece of 8 year old me died. Lol
I see your "streaming can hurt our library of movies" as a function of preservation and raise you video game emulation. Here are companies who released games over a decade ago, who have released new systems in that time and no longer support those older games, but will smack down any and all attempts at archiving and redistributing those titles despite there being no way to play those games without the secondhand market. The developers and publishers would rather prevent you playing their games by any means except by being them secondhand at exorbitant prices than allow open source archiving of their content.
So, not a pod cast aficionado, and the subject matter isn't really anything I would consider day to day - but kudos to you all, this has been very easy listening. Testament to good people talking about stuff and being engaged in it, and knowing their subject matter is always good to listen! And I learnt new things, interesting things! Awesome.
Adam Savage on Hot Ones with Sean Evans 🔥 would be brilliant! I enjoy everything First We Feast puts out but Hot Ones is really a gem. Shaun Evans and Adam Savage both have very dynamic engaging personalities they would be so much fun to watch together! I can only imagine the questions that Sean could come up with for Adam. I really hope we get to see this happen.
Can't believe I blanked out on SEAN EVANS too.. he says it every time and it's on screen. But more to the point: Adam on Hot Ones is like why has this NOT happened yet.
My problem with disks is, I HATE THE DISKS. They don't do a great job preserving the movie because they are so fragile. Copying them requires alchemy. They are region locked. They annoy me.
Hey guys. I'd like to see you build a prosthetic arm or leg. I keep getting voids and heat problems with my prints. It's a dream for me to make prosthetics for kids. I'd sure like to get some directions from pros. It's a problem for kids because they grow and need replacements. You can guess the cost of a corporate made one...in the thousands and parents can't keep up.
Perfect argument for collecting physical media and not using streaming. However, just like the people who complained about pillar-boxing and letterboxing, most people don't seem to care about aspect ratio or editing of content post-release. Perhaps there should be a law that means that all streaming is pan and scan (the people who object will already be consuming bastardised versions anyway), asa move to promote physical media? 'Market forces' are usualy not prepared to preserve media correctly.
One of my first experiences of making/really cool behind the scenes stuff was on DVDs of Men In Black and Lord Of The Rings. As a poor college student I dont always pay for movies, but I think discs are better then streaming because of the extras/bloopers/comentary.
I do loving going to a theater to watch a movie -- but I also hate it. I have the Alamo around here and we will never go to another theater chain, but at the same time it's a bit scary in theaters (no security, we are all sitting in a box, and I live in a state where people can carry guns anywhere practically) ....and it's expensive. The fact is that home viewing will be the next thing, and will eventually take over movie theaters. From what I hear, the only movies really doing well (other than a few indie greats, or occasional buzz-worthy movie) are the Marvel movies. Soon we'll be able to buy 100-inch TVs for under a grand, and eventually will have wall-sized TVs for cheap. Soon, the only media left untuned for a TV will be older movies.
Unfortunately, most tv makers think all the extra value is in their processing of the input. The top of the line Sony OLED and the cheapest LG OLED have the exact same panel made by LG. The extra cost difference you are paying for is cosmetic and those digital processing extras. But that's just silly because what hope does a $10 chip (if that) have at making a better assessment 60 times a second for stuff like "that should be brighter" compared to an Oscar-winnning DP spending months at Skywalker Ranch? Yet Sony expects you to pay thousands extra for that $10 chip's ability to second-guess the filmmakers. At the very least, if a tv detects a 24FPS input (which most blu-ray players and services like Netflix and Amazon can do), then it should default to doing absolutely no processing unless the end user dives through some pretty obscure menus that are prefaced by "Warning: Don't touch unless you know what you're doing. Live jaguar!".
I love the soap opera look, everyone that has seen it on my tv comments on how amazing it looks, I’m not sure why anyone wouldn’t like it looking more three dimensional.
Thank you for pointing out this Motion Smoothing dilemma.... if you can make a 35mm movie look like a VHS copy and people got no problem with this.... that is up there together with the mp3 "gate".... :)
The ONLY "Best / Favorite Movie" can ONLY be ONE -- the ORIGINAL "The Day The Earth Stood Still", if you have ANY taste or sense at all. These "inline ads" by Norm are BULLSHIT.
Reality, some prefer watching movies on tv, some prefer it in large cinematic format. If Christopher Nolan was a musician he would probably say that you should'nt listen to his music on anything else than a $100,000 worth of audio equipment. Having that said, Motion Smoothing is pure shite whatever you watch. TV buyers should get more aware (good thing you talking about this) and TV manufacturers should stop bringing crap and focus on getting the best picture possible instead of technical jerk outs.
We have a 4K tv we just bought it looks like crap to us compared to the one in my living room, we figured out the living room tv had motion smoothing and it looks better than the brand new 4K picture..I genuinely don’t understand the hatred for the technology, every single person that has watched a movie at my house has asked why it looks “so much better” than it does on theirs. Not different, better. So what are you all comparing it to? Maybe for games or something it might be odd, but I just do not understand.
Motion smoothing is the dumbest thing on the planet, PERIOD. 4k TVs have some amazing processing for 1080p video and HDMI inputs. I absolutely love mine, BUT the first thing i do to ANY tv and even any tv i install or tell someone to buy is to turn off any post processing off. Trumotion (and others by different brands), get turned off, digital clean view for noise and contract enhancer is off as well. I use fit to screen as it is the best to use. I also calibrate the tv as that makes the biggest tv. Even on my ps3 that i use for US DVDs i make sure that i have 60p off so the movie runs in 24/25p. Don't get me wrong 60fps looks MUCH better then 24fps but only if it's filmed and processed that way.
So you love all the new visual technology BUT you still want to view movies with the frame rate from 100 years ago, when movies didn't have sweeping cameras? Thats silly. All video games are moving to 60 fps or higher. I guess movies "buffs" can stay trapped in the past.
Dude, you do know that film is bigger is size then most digital sensors. Why do you think movies are still shot on film? It's not for the hell of it it's because the media is MUCH bigger then any digital camera. Not only that, digital cameras shoot with sensors and pixels. We don't see in pixels our vision is quite different then digital media. Why do you think film pictures look better then iphones or digital pictures.
Norman, Will, aAdam, help i need trumaning for five years.then to the moon. help me my art is me.a plyable object of fascination who cannot express only in word.none of my art is seen but i cant stop.but maybe i'm the art.find me. this
Get real! 24p sucks rocks! I've always hated that strobe effect in theaters that completely takes me out of the moment. 60p movies can't get here soon enough. And don't get me started on film grain. It is *NOT* a good thing, unless it's all about the "artsy" look and the story (if there even is one) is irrelevant. If you don't mind slow frame rates it must be because your perception is abnormally slow and you can't actually see it. Much like people who like IPAs can't actually taste the bile-bitter puke.
the Qwest commercial i mentioned: ruclips.net/video/xAxtxPAUcwQ/видео.html
Can't wait for a Hot Ones episode with Adam!
It has to be a reunion with Le Chapeau tho.
yeah adam and jamie on hot ones would be cool.
"What do you hate more, Da Bomb or each other? Go!"
The first episode with a true on camera spit-take.
Sean Evans, this is your bat-call. Get Adam on Hot Ones.
Okay Nation, we all need to send tweets to Sean Evans and First We Feast
Motion smoothing talk begins at 17:23
I agree for the most part. It just brings that weird soap-opera look to film. That's just not something you want when you're watching Goodfellas or Saving Private Ryan. For sports it actually enhances the experience because you can follow the action more closely.
For animation it's equally weird as film. It manages to give even Rick & Morty a soap opera look, which is just too damn weird. There are older anime that have been meticulously animated frame by frame to give a beautifully timed motion blur & illusion of speed that is just annihilated by motion-flow ( Sony's trademark ). The classics from FLCL to Cowboy Bebop are just ruined by it.
I HATE motion smoothing. My brother likes it but I cannot stand it.
It makes Star Wars and Bladerunner look like old Doctor Who. The old Doctor Who was awesome, but definitely not beautiful to look at. Smoothing makes the best practical effects ever done, look like absolute crap.
Ming Mongo - Yes!! I have always personally likened it to makes cinema look like a BBC series. The frame rate of cinema is a huuuge component to the vibe of a film; one must craft the direction of a shoot, whether it’s tv or cinema, to match the presentation medium. TV settings out of the box butcher everything
24 frames per second was set because of technical limitations at the invention of film, plus its the minimum required for the illusion of motion. The idea that this is the "optimal" frame rate is ridiculous. Old movies didn't have cameras that moved at lot. Using 24 fps on modern fast moving movies is just stupid. The reality is eventually all movies will be filmed at 48 fps (or higher) just like almost all movies are filmed on video now. Motion smoothing is the only way I can watch modern movies without them looking like crap.
@@TwistedFire85 it makes it seem unreal
Best mid-cast advertisement ever. Perfect timing with the return of Wolverine in the comics.
In my experience, the digital codes included in Blu-ray combo packs don't actually expire on their expiration date, or seemingly ever. Just this year I've been able to successfully redeem dozens of movies with 'expired' codes, going back quite a few years.
I die a little inside every time Norm makes a great segue and everyone immediately calls it out.
The main problem with motion smoothing isn't it making a smoother image, most directors don't shoot 24fps because they wanted to, but because that's what film was. The main problem with motion smoothing is the weird "wave" that happens on the border between, static and moving parts of the image. Especially visible car scenes for example, where they film the side windows and the card is still and the background is scrolling by.
I don't really have time to watch this today, but I'm going to add this to my "watch later" list. I just came here to say YES to the title. There are always artifacts, and it can push the effective shutter angle beyond 360 degrees. It gives it the look of those older video cameras that needed a while after seeing something bright before the remnants of those highlights fade.
Film licensing is frustrating. If you buy a disk, it has a load of protection on it to stop you using it how it suits you and it has an annoying person telling you how bad piracy is. If you "buy" a film from a streaming service it can randomly disappear. If you want to be able to stream every film that's released then you have to subscribe to multiple competing streaming services.
So it's far, far easier to pirate things. No irritating anti piracy advert (ironic really), no worries about the film randomly expiring, you just enjoy it in a way that suits you.
Steam made buying games easier than pirating games. Why can't films be the same?
There are serial commercials that are consistently great, for example the Swedish ICA commercials. They've been doing them since 2001.
You know what I miss with streaming vs physical media the most? Director's commentary.
Thank you for saying the word that means why tv looks so weird to me on some people tvs. I didn't know motion smoothing was a thing, but it makes so much more sense to me now! My tvs don't do it. As a classically trained photographer (bachelors degree at the time of conversion to digital photo) it has been driving me nuts not knowing what to call why the tvs kept looking weird to me.
about motion smoothing...
as an artist and game designer, i cant control in this day and age what kind of display my stuff is shown on.
ive got two displays at home that have two differant colour schemes, even after calibration.
in the digital age where everyone can see what they want on tv or pc, you just have to accept that your original creation is going to be transformed by the medium.
also as a father, with a steady job i dont have time to go to the cinema. and movies dont stay in theaters forever, they live on on tv and streaming.
so if im a cinematographer i would like to have my film be only in cinema, but its not gonna last.
Anyone else think the 'mid roll' ad is way too long? When watching monetised videos, I'll often let front roll ads run, but mid roll ads I will always skip because it interrupts the flow of whatever I'm watching. That, obviously, isn't an option here. Neither is me getting a tested premium membership right now as I barely have enough to pay my bills and buy food. But that mid roll ad is putting me off the podcast. Not enough to stop watching yet, but it could one day if they stay, especially if they stay as long as they are.
Premium membership doesn't remove the adds either, so don't worry about that one...
Agreed. The minute + ad just threw me out of the podcast listening mood. The front Monetised ad has been on here for awhile and I've certainly look at some products I otherwise might not have if not presented here. Now I feel like I need to avoid this Logan story just because of the interruption.
Where are these video stores?
Fix 3:2 pull-down judder on panning scenes and I'll disable my motion smoothing
Finally confirmation that I'm not insane... Have complained about motion smoothing so much when visiting friends and family and seeing it on their televisions and then having them say they don't see it. Felt like I was taking crazy pills.
Quinton Lennox why complained, we love ours, most and people always comment how much better it looks than theirs, my favorite thing is “it’s like it’s 3D” I’m trying to understand the logic of disliking it because you complainers are probably gonna end up getting the option yanked off of new TVs and we love it! If you dislike it you can just turn it off in the menu.
9:40 - Sean Evans. If you haven't seen it,go check it out: ruclips.net/video/p-P5-7eV9GE/видео.html
15-20,000 titles? You guys should check out Scarecrow Video in Seattle, they have well over 100,000 titles on the shelf!
OH MY GOD. I hate motion smoothing! Every time I get around a TV I turn it off. It's horrible.
Bluray and HD ruined the original Ghostbusters for me. You can tell that the final, rooftop battle was shot on a sound stage, and you can see the 4x8 sheets of plywood on the ground that were painted black and a piece of 8 year old me died. Lol
Motion smoothing makes me sick because it is never consistent it can't always guess the frames so it always seems like it is skipping.
I'm giving this video a like for Norm's Gattaca reference, I love that quote.
Adam we need space suits. It your chance to really make one or two.
I see your "streaming can hurt our library of movies" as a function of preservation and raise you video game emulation. Here are companies who released games over a decade ago, who have released new systems in that time and no longer support those older games, but will smack down any and all attempts at archiving and redistributing those titles despite there being no way to play those games without the secondhand market. The developers and publishers would rather prevent you playing their games by any means except by being them secondhand at exorbitant prices than allow open source archiving of their content.
So, not a pod cast aficionado, and the subject matter isn't really anything I would consider day to day - but kudos to you all, this has been very easy listening. Testament to good people talking about stuff and being engaged in it, and knowing their subject matter is always good to listen! And I learnt new things, interesting things! Awesome.
Ya, for example, how is The Abyss not available on UHD/Blu-ray yet? Seriously...
X'D listening to the struggles of humans who still use itunes pleases me greatly
regenerative breaking X'D that's actually gold
Totally agree with the 'use whatever black bars give you the correct ratio' take there Adam. Fuck the 'fill the screen and it looks better'.
Please make the Poddie Mouth Award! And if you don't can I steal that idea?!
Adam Savage on Hot Ones with Sean Evans 🔥 would be brilliant! I enjoy everything First We Feast puts out but Hot Ones is really a gem. Shaun Evans and Adam Savage both have very dynamic engaging personalities they would be so much fun to watch together! I can only imagine the questions that Sean could come up with for Adam. I really hope we get to see this happen.
Aliens is my nr 1 movie. Have been since i was a teenager. It just has all the things rolled into one movie.
Adam, please do Hot Ones!
A one wheel isn't really a bad Segway, it's more of half a Segway.
Can't believe I blanked out on SEAN EVANS too.. he says it every time and it's on screen.
But more to the point: Adam on Hot Ones is like why has this NOT happened yet.
Thank you! Everyone always looks at me like I'm nuts when I gripe about how TV's make old movies look. I feel vindicated at last.
Hot Ones fan need to pause their calls for Gordon Ramsay and Joe Rogan to get Adam on the show. We have a willing victim on our hands.
My problem with disks is, I HATE THE DISKS. They don't do a great job preserving the movie because they are so fragile. Copying them requires alchemy. They are region locked. They annoy me.
Is Norm going to be the next Garrison Keillor?
Everybody try to get Sean to invite Adam on for the next season of Hot Ones!
Favorite movie: Swiss Army man. It's an absolute masterpiece that took me by surprise and blew me away. I don't even need to think about it.
Hot one's???? How Savage.
wow the first seconds of this were REALLY weird to me because I could see Adam speaking but it wasnt his voice at all lol !!! kinda trippy
Adam! No Snapple?
Hey guys. I'd like to see you build a prosthetic arm or leg. I keep getting voids and heat problems with my prints. It's a dream for me to make prosthetics for kids. I'd sure like to get some directions from pros. It's a problem for kids because they grow and need replacements. You can guess the cost of a corporate made one...in the thousands and parents can't keep up.
Lol norm is sitting there hating until adam defends podcasting
Adam Savage on Hot Ones FTW!
Perfect argument for collecting physical media and not using streaming. However, just like the people who complained about pillar-boxing and letterboxing, most people don't seem to care about aspect ratio or editing of content post-release. Perhaps there should be a law that means that all streaming is pan and scan (the people who object will already be consuming bastardised versions anyway), asa move to promote physical media? 'Market forces' are usualy not prepared to preserve media correctly.
Don't make fun of Norm's Deep Thoughts-- that was a good one.
Barnaby Dixon! love Dabchick, Manu, the Raptor
Why don’t you guys provide some graphics when something is mentioned. (Pop up or something)
Because that requires editing (the shorter /more heavily edited a video is the more time it usually takes, time being money too).
Totally I know, I am a video editor. Just a proposal.
😅
They might be buzzy across their canals but it would be a nice touch.
One of my first experiences of making/really cool behind the scenes stuff was on DVDs of Men In Black and Lord Of The Rings. As a poor college student I dont always pay for movies, but I think discs are better then streaming because of the extras/bloopers/comentary.
Adam is about the smartest dude on earth and if it does not offend him, a Godly man.
I do loving going to a theater to watch a movie -- but I also hate it. I have the Alamo around here and we will never go to another theater chain, but at the same time it's a bit scary in theaters (no security, we are all sitting in a box, and I live in a state where people can carry guns anywhere practically) ....and it's expensive. The fact is that home viewing will be the next thing, and will eventually take over movie theaters. From what I hear, the only movies really doing well (other than a few indie greats, or occasional buzz-worthy movie) are the Marvel movies. Soon we'll be able to buy 100-inch TVs for under a grand, and eventually will have wall-sized TVs for cheap. Soon, the only media left untuned for a TV will be older movies.
Real Title: Through the Editors Eyes
Emmys... Yummies... Emmys
Love you guys :)
watching adam talk about not wining awards while stroking a gun =P
I was made for this moon trip
Unfortunately, most tv makers think all the extra value is in their processing of the input. The top of the line Sony OLED and the cheapest LG OLED have the exact same panel made by LG. The extra cost difference you are paying for is cosmetic and those digital processing extras. But that's just silly because what hope does a $10 chip (if that) have at making a better assessment 60 times a second for stuff like "that should be brighter" compared to an Oscar-winnning DP spending months at Skywalker Ranch? Yet Sony expects you to pay thousands extra for that $10 chip's ability to second-guess the filmmakers. At the very least, if a tv detects a 24FPS input (which most blu-ray players and services like Netflix and Amazon can do), then it should default to doing absolutely no processing unless the end user dives through some pretty obscure menus that are prefaced by "Warning: Don't touch unless you know what you're doing. Live jaguar!".
That would be acceptable, so long as there is an actual live jaguar. Otherwise its just more false advertising :)
Motion smoothing makes almost everything expect live sporting events look like crap.
I love the soap opera look, everyone that has seen it on my tv comments on how amazing it looks, I’m not sure why anyone wouldn’t like it looking more three dimensional.
barnaby dixon is amazing
My new podcast is going to be called "Regenerative Braking" :)
for gods sake Adam just pull out the Samaritan already
Thank you for pointing out this Motion Smoothing dilemma.... if you can make a 35mm movie look like a VHS copy and people got no problem with this.... that is up there together with the mp3 "gate".... :)
I would have to see a side by side before making an opinion.
The ONLY "Best / Favorite Movie" can ONLY be ONE -- the ORIGINAL "The Day The Earth Stood Still", if you have ANY taste or sense at all.
These "inline ads" by Norm are BULLSHIT.
We need to stop with "the best X" question and introduce the notion of Pareto front to people…
Good Stuff!
For those interested in aspect ratios: ruclips.net/video/3CgrMsjGk7k/видео.html
Sony’s Cinema Pro motion smoothing looks good.
Sean Evans!
Reality, some prefer watching movies on tv, some prefer it in large cinematic format. If Christopher Nolan was a musician he would probably say that you should'nt listen to his music on anything else than a $100,000 worth of audio equipment.
Having that said, Motion Smoothing is pure shite whatever you watch. TV buyers should get more aware (good thing you talking about this) and TV manufacturers should stop bringing crap and focus on getting the best picture possible instead of technical jerk outs.
We have a 4K tv we just bought it looks like crap to us compared to the one in my living room, we figured out the living room tv had motion smoothing and it looks better than the brand new 4K picture..I genuinely don’t understand the hatred for the technology, every single person that has watched a movie at my house has asked why it looks “so much better” than it does on theirs. Not different, better. So what are you all comparing it to? Maybe for games or something it might be odd, but I just do not understand.
One Downside of Dics and Remaster is Star wars the Original Trilogy
be part of this giant peace of art film me AND MY FAMILY TO TELL THE STORY IN COMPLETE.NOT SHOOTING CAP Lock stuck.
Sleep can wait!
nice vid
I've said it before, and I will say it again. Will needs to go
Can we just have NO or LESS video with Will? He's TERRIBLE!
Motion smoothing is the dumbest thing on the planet, PERIOD. 4k TVs have some amazing processing for 1080p video and HDMI inputs. I absolutely love mine, BUT the first thing i do to ANY tv and even any tv i install or tell someone to buy is to turn off any post processing off. Trumotion (and others by different brands), get turned off, digital clean view for noise and contract enhancer is off as well. I use fit to screen as it is the best to use. I also calibrate the tv as that makes the biggest tv. Even on my ps3 that i use for US DVDs i make sure that i have 60p off so the movie runs in 24/25p. Don't get me wrong 60fps looks MUCH better then 24fps but only if it's filmed and processed that way.
So you love all the new visual technology BUT you still want to view movies with the frame rate from 100 years ago, when movies didn't have sweeping cameras? Thats silly. All video games are moving to 60 fps or higher. I guess movies "buffs" can stay trapped in the past.
Dude, you do know that film is bigger is size then most digital sensors. Why do you think movies are still shot on film? It's not for the hell of it it's because the media is MUCH bigger then any digital camera. Not only that, digital cameras shoot with sensors and pixels. We don't see in pixels our vision is quite different then digital media. Why do you think film pictures look better then iphones or digital pictures.
Will again? *_Yawn!_*
¡Correcto!
Norman, Will, aAdam, help i need trumaning for five years.then to the moon. help me my art is me.a plyable object of fascination who cannot express only in word.none of my art is seen but i cant stop.but maybe i'm the art.find me. this
There are Samsung TV's that you can't even turn off the motion smoothing..... I HATE MOTION SMOOTHING! RUINS MOVIES!!!
Get real! 24p sucks rocks! I've always hated that strobe effect in theaters that completely takes me out of the moment. 60p movies can't get here soon enough.
And don't get me started on film grain. It is *NOT* a good thing, unless it's all about the "artsy" look and the story (if there even is one) is irrelevant.
If you don't mind slow frame rates it must be because your perception is abnormally slow and you can't actually see it. Much like people who like IPAs can't actually taste the bile-bitter puke.
Pin me
bend over then...