Does FMJ Ammo REALLY Over-Penetrate? .45 ACP, 10mm and .44 Special Ballistic Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 май 2021
  • I hear it said a lot that full metal jacket ammunition (FMJ, TMJ, Ball) will over-penetrate the intended target (bad-guy, criminal etc) when a firearm is used in self defense against them. I also know that the FBI and IWBA have set standards that around 18" of ballistics gel is the maximum you want to penetrate to insure your ammo does not over-penetrate. Well what if it does? That's my test today, trying to make bullets go through equivalent to 20" of 10% ballistics gel and then get a chronograph read on the other side, while using .45 ACP, .44 Special and 10mm from duty sized guns. I also have made an "innocent bystander" made of ballistics gel and MDF (bone) to see if FMJ ammo does indeed have enough power after exiting a person, to kill an innocent bystander. Always appreciative of any channel help :) www.patreon.com/search?q=gun+sam
    As promised, the link I mention with 9mm FMJ: • FMJ Always Overpenetra...
  • СпортСпорт

Комментарии • 361

  • @GunSam
    @GunSam  3 года назад +19

    As promised, the link I mention with 9mm FMJ: ruclips.net/video/SK7nDMxF3Y8/видео.html

    • @joemorganeatmyshortschannel
      @joemorganeatmyshortschannel 3 года назад +4

      very cool i think you figured out and documented why the old timers stuck with heavy bullets in revolver rounds with a lead round nose

    • @chrish.4067
      @chrish.4067 3 года назад +1

      You're getting more creative. This is very interesting!

    • @357-swagnumultramagax9
      @357-swagnumultramagax9 2 года назад

      @@lestergillis8171 please get help .

    • @TheKhanhhoa
      @TheKhanhhoa Год назад

      @@chrish.4067 my thoughts as well

  • @avshockey6633
    @avshockey6633 3 года назад +45

    I understand the concern about pass throughs, but I would be a lot more worried about missing the intended target and directly hitting a bystander, than hitting a bystander with a pass through. It would be interesting to see a study on how often people are actually hit by pass throughs. I would bet it's pretty rare.

    • @kennethrisner8648
      @kennethrisner8648 9 месяцев назад +2

      This is what I mean by I have yet, and 2 years later I might add, to see any proof.

    • @iankelly3479
      @iankelly3479 5 месяцев назад +1

      A pass through hitting an innocent bystander is almost nonexistent. In actual use of force incidents. People are not ballistic gel. There are bones and tendons and muscles. Acting on the path of the bullet, causing instability, deformation, and possibly fragmentation. Not to mention, people generally don't run into or tword gun fire. Over penitration can occur. However, it's grossly overrepresented in the use of force theory. Missing your intended target and killing or injuring a bystander is much more likely.
      In the heat of the moment, it's probably not a good idea to shoot an attacker that's not very near you. The attacker will try and avoid getting shot. You could miss several times even if they are very close. The criminal will be moving. A contact shot, however, won't miss and could be angled downward.

    • @ravenrise320
      @ravenrise320 3 месяца назад

      I doubt anyone has done a definitive study on the subject.
      But.
      I know of at least two instances of pass throughs hitting and, in one case, killing someone.
      One case I read about in a police oriented magazine was recorded back in the earliest days of police transitioning to 9mm Glock semi-autos in NY.
      Two NYPD officiers engaged an armed robber in an alleyway at such close range.
      That bullets passing through the "perp" struck and seriously injured one of the officiers.
      Another instance was related to me from a good friend of mine who I trust, who served in Iraq.
      He personally witnessed a fellow soldier get hit by a pass through 5.56 "green tip" hit on an Iraqi insurgent inside a house.
      Bullet passed through the Iraqi's torso and struck another soldier in the throat and exited out the back of his skull.
      Soldier was DRT.
      Iraqi lived to get medical evaced and was, according to him, later turned over to Army Intel for questioning some time later after surgery.
      So yes.
      Pass throughs DO happen, and people can damn sure be harmed or killed by them.
      It's just that police shootings are usually closely guarded and investigated affairs, and most of the public seldom, if ever, hears a lot of detail about such inquiries....let alone is able to record them in a statistical fashion as to whether or not an officier or civilian got hit by pass through bullets.
      And in the military?
      Such things fade into invisibility in the" fog of war".
      A place where dead is just...dead....and the method of death matters less to anyone immediately concerned inasmuch as the fact that their friend, an ally, or enemy, is killed by ANY thing.
      Therefore, such things are even LESS likely to ever be recorded.

  • @joshuagibson2520
    @joshuagibson2520 3 года назад +13

    Awesome! Glad to see you got readings after the pass through! All very interesting data for all calibers.

  • @williammccaslin8527
    @williammccaslin8527 3 года назад +22

    FMJ's are good for head shots, on 2 legged an 4 legged critters, thx for the vid.

    • @sleeper.simulant7327
      @sleeper.simulant7327 3 года назад +2

      FMJ flat points, round ball ammo is notorious for deflecting

    • @jehovahuponyou
      @jehovahuponyou 3 года назад +1

      @@sleeper.simulant7327
      IN THIS DAY AND AGE OF DEEVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN RACE, WHERE PEOPLE ARE BORN WITH 5" THICK SKULLS, YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @TheTruth-sd8ey
      @TheTruth-sd8ey 2 года назад

      @@sleeper.simulant7327 flat nose bullets (fpj) (like .40 or 10mm) is a totally different thing that round nose (like in 9×19 fmj). Latter are indeed known for deflecting, but not flat points.

    • @sleeper.simulant7327
      @sleeper.simulant7327 2 года назад

      @@jehovahuponyou I don’t use FMJ’s for defense, that’s for hollow points. In the woods I carry flat nose FMJ’s

    • @sleeper.simulant7327
      @sleeper.simulant7327 2 года назад

      @@TheTruth-sd8ey I’m very aware that flat points tend to hold true against barries, and are also superior in terms of barrier penetration, specifically mono metal or hardcast. Ball ammo out of a 9mm or 45 isn’t the greatest for barrier penetration. Read an article where a guy attempted to use his 45 ACP on an elk that spined. Not one ball ammo round penetrated the rib cage, every single one deflected. Long story short he finished it off with his rifle. I wouldn’t trust a 45 with ball ammo in the woods after reading that…

  • @willo7734
    @willo7734 3 года назад +9

    These over penetration videos might be your best work. Interesting results and I haven’t seen this done this thoroughly before.

  • @Predalien195
    @Predalien195 3 года назад +10

    Results aren't too surprising. I recall an interview with Larry Vickers where he was was asked about 9mm or .45, he said if body armor is not in play and it's FMJ only, .45 ACP hands down. 230gr Ball does quite well even with little or no expansion. The .44 Special surprised me a bit by going a tad deeper but given how JHP's tend not to expand much at all in those shorter barrels I'm not totally shocked. The .44 Russian is what really surprised me. I've seen it's ballistics on paper but rarely any actual tests. I'd feel perfectly armed with one of those today based on what I saw.
    The 10mm going as deep as it did shouldn't shock anybody as you always hear how 10mm over penetrates and so forth. Excellent video as usual.

  • @cirocundin
    @cirocundin 3 года назад +12

    Sam, have you considered the effects of 45auto with different meplat profiles? I would be curious to examine FP FMJ terminal effects. Applications in the past have been documented, NYC police and others, where FP ammo in 45 auto was a go to choice. Best

  • @joshuagibson2520
    @joshuagibson2520 3 года назад +6

    Thanks Sam. Always doing your part to try and quench my isatiable thirst for facts, good testing procedures, and overall knowledge. You're much appreciated my friend.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thanks!

  • @knobjob2839
    @knobjob2839 2 года назад +3

    Interesting results. Cool tests too. The chronograph behind the gel was a good idea 👍

  • @toolmakerbest1584
    @toolmakerbest1584 3 года назад +6

    This video is going into my mental list of favorite top 10 from you, and the bar is very high! Great job! 👍

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thank you.

  • @kingarthur5655
    @kingarthur5655 2 года назад +1

    I think this was a very informative video. Thank you for that. Something else I think is worth mentioning is how those bullets changed direction when exiting the media. We are taught to look at the target and what is beyond the target. This video makes me think that there is more unpredictability on a pass through than we are led to believe. This really sheds light on the absolute necessity for quality hollow point or frangible rounds in your EDC. Amazing video!

  • @addytuney2028
    @addytuney2028 3 года назад +4

    Great info Sam and capturing those two spinning bullets on video is amazing!!! thank you!

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Thanks.

  • @tiltedflip4491
    @tiltedflip4491 3 года назад +1

    That was awesome getting the chrono pass through readings!

  • @eddiel7033
    @eddiel7033 3 года назад +8

    The ballistic bystander returns!

  • @louishuelsman4510
    @louishuelsman4510 Год назад +2

    Gr8 video and awesome info,Glad the sub count is getting up there I remember when there was less then 10 of us no ur Paul Harrell JR!!!! TY for ur time!!

  • @danoneill2846
    @danoneill2846 3 года назад +28

    The 45 acp HP moved the block More than any other round . It may not have gone too deep , I think it would have made the largest hole . This is how they can fail to go " deep enough " but do far better than the ones that did go deep enough .

    • @theone031
      @theone031 3 года назад +16

      I dont care what the so called gun guru's say 45auto is not the same as 9mm. I hear that all the time about caliber doesn't matter it's where you place the shot! Horse sh*t!

    • @exothermal.sprocket
      @exothermal.sprocket 3 года назад +13

      @@theone031 If you've probably noticed, those who say that about the 9mm are deeply enthusiastic, subjective, and fanatical about the 9mm and therefore their emotions matter more than facts.

    • @jmurphy68463
      @jmurphy68463 3 года назад +19

      @@theone031 In the USMC I've seen guys take 15+ rounds of 9mm in the chest and keep coming. I've also seen guys take one or two rounds of .45 in the chest and drop dead. I've never trusted 9mm.

    • @ryanranard5187
      @ryanranard5187 3 года назад +1

      9mm, 40 s&w & 45 auto roughly perform the same. The energy of each of the rounds are roughly the same. 9mm hardball sucks just like 45 hardball sucks. Compared to HPs.

    • @exothermal.sprocket
      @exothermal.sprocket 3 года назад +9

      @@ryanranard5187 "perform roughly the same"
      "energy of each...roughly the same"
      You're simply not saying anything. Ballistics is not a simple subject, no matter how many one-liners the internet spews out.

  • @charlesirby9222
    @charlesirby9222 3 года назад +1

    Over the top again Sam...such creativity with the gel blocks!
    Whether or not you get penetration on the innocent bystander is beside the point...Your going to have a law suit on your hands.
    If we see a consistent exit of the perp...I would have pause using that round.

  • @carloparisi9945
    @carloparisi9945 3 года назад +5

    That 45 acp load is impressive, in a 2" 1917 colt it would make for an outstanding Applegate special.

  • @dirtpitoutdoors2045
    @dirtpitoutdoors2045 3 года назад +9

    As always! Great video brother!

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Thank you.

  • @theone031
    @theone031 3 года назад +5

    Great video. Knocked it out of the park with this one! Kudos

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +3

      Thank you. And who else but me would throw .44 in there? lol

  • @Ds_Drums
    @Ds_Drums 3 года назад +3

    Great vid! Thanks for posting. I specifically was interested in the 45 since I use that frequently. Interesting information.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thanks!

  • @davidcunningham6856
    @davidcunningham6856 3 года назад +12

    This review gave us definitive answers to very important questions. Great work! Love those big boy rounds, thanks!

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +3

      Thanks for watching!

  • @ratagris21
    @ratagris21 3 года назад +3

    Great testing Sam. Thank you for all you do. Proves quite a bit about over penetration in the 4s.. ♠️☯️🎩

  • @alexandertoshich765
    @alexandertoshich765 3 года назад +5

    Very interesting information. Keep up the awesome videos.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thank you.

  • @jamesmutz7435
    @jamesmutz7435 3 года назад +3

    Great information and well presented. Thanks for putting this out there for us.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @johngalt6929
    @johngalt6929 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for posting that interesting information!

  • @bobcatforever3485
    @bobcatforever3485 3 года назад +1

    Good video. Thanks for all the work you put into these video. Take care.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thanks for watching!

  • @joshuabriggs7114
    @joshuabriggs7114 11 месяцев назад

    Very informative Sam!

  • @talon2pro
    @talon2pro 3 года назад +17

    Sam, I bet the FBI will start using YOUR tests as their standards! As usual, another quantitative measure of information. Great job! Also, gotta love a .45 auto.

  • @user-oy9zy4ds9m
    @user-oy9zy4ds9m 3 года назад +2

    I love how you measured velocity after pass through the gel. I think that’s tells us most conclusively lethality after pass through

  • @matt5415
    @matt5415 3 года назад +16

    I’m an insurance examiner so I know how litigious people are. I think just bouncing an over-penetrating bullet off an innocent bystander will get you sued. Not saying you’d lose the case, but it would suck tremendously to have to go to court. I say hollow points are totally necessary for concealed carry purposes.

    • @ajopasoij9d00
      @ajopasoij9d00 3 года назад +3

      FBI data shows about 30% hollow points do not expand at all which means, most likely, overpenetration. So yeah just let the criminal kill you, if you end up defending yourself you might get sued

    • @Subtlenimbus
      @Subtlenimbus 2 года назад +2

      Or you could look at it this way: The probability of missing entirely is greater than over-penetrating and hitting someone else behind your target, so would you rather hit a bystander with a hollow point or an fmj? And then of course, there is the very high failure rate of hollow points in actual shootings that RobertoMatos mentioned, and most expanding ammo is loaded hotter than fmj, so the over penetration would be even worse.

  • @tldnr
    @tldnr 3 года назад +1

    Hey highlighted path trajectory is really smart. Cool idea great vid.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Hey, thanks!

  • @chrisshoopman7880
    @chrisshoopman7880 3 года назад +1

    Nice test results.

  • @NoTimeForThatNow
    @NoTimeForThatNow 3 года назад +3

    I would have thought the lead roundnose would have deformed a bit, that was surprising to me.
    Man, with the volume of great videos and level of detail and quality information you put into your videos, it is difficult to say one or another is the best. But this video has to be a top contender for that title!

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад

      Not really . A RN at those velocities ( with modern era alloys ) will have minimal deformation .
      If you Want deformation on purpose , you would need to cast with a very soft binary Lead- Tin alloy of 1:30 , or even 1:40 .

    • @NoTimeForThatNow
      @NoTimeForThatNow 3 года назад

      @@filianablanxart8305 uhh... forgive me for being surprised, I guess?

  • @jmurphy68463
    @jmurphy68463 3 года назад +29

    If I hadn't seen it for myself I probably never would have believed it. When I was in the Marine Corps I witnessed the devastation of a .45 ACP full metal jacket. I watched a man get hit as the round passed completely through him and completely through the guy behind him and into a third guy that was behind him. It can be done.
    By the way, all my .45 hollow point defensive rounds are 230 grains. I will never trust a .45 bullet that's not at least 230 grains.

    • @hawkboy1792
      @hawkboy1792 3 года назад

      Lol

    • @sctm81
      @sctm81 2 года назад +3

      Did it stop all 3 guys on the first round?

    • @RJ-rf8fu
      @RJ-rf8fu 2 года назад +6

      Really late reply, and just a theory, but I'm thinking that issue ammo might be loaded a bit hotter than plinking ammo.

    • @TheKhanhhoa
      @TheKhanhhoa Год назад +3

      hey John, thanks for the info about the pass through on the 3 of our brothers. Thank you for standing tall when our country needed you.....just an old nam vet.....RESPECT

    • @jmurphy68463
      @jmurphy68463 Год назад

      @@TheKhanhhoa Semper Fi, brother.

  • @go4ride
    @go4ride 4 месяца назад

    Thanks a lot for your work.

  • @ChuckTruitt
    @ChuckTruitt 2 года назад +1

    Great!!! You make such great videos. I really enjoy your stuff. -Gunny T sends

  • @sstritmatter2158
    @sstritmatter2158 2 года назад +1

    I wouldn't risk it with fmj ball. Good test and interesting. I'm grateful you also threw in .44 spl - it's a very under-rated round. I have a .44 mag Taurus for my woods gun and doubles as a night stand home defense gun using .44spl jacketed hp. This test confirms my decision - I'm glad to see what it does as it's not often used in demonstration videos. I'll also add it's extremely accurate. I can put 3 shots in 2" or less groups at 7 yards double action. Currently running Hornady Home Defense at 165 gr hp but I'm interested in the 200 gr gold dot Underwood you used. I'll try them. Thanks again for a great video.

  • @civhonbmm3
    @civhonbmm3 3 года назад

    Great video I guess that but you did check the recording later And seen that the ammo shot after was affecting the penetration In which also deflected took away this is a great video thank for the time 😌

  • @frederickwezzeroth2611
    @frederickwezzeroth2611 3 года назад +2

    Excellent video!!!

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Thanks!

  • @factsoftheconfederacy7151
    @factsoftheconfederacy7151 3 года назад +16

    .45 ACP is underrated today

    • @totallyfrozen
      @totallyfrozen 3 года назад +7

      Amen!
      People consider it “old” so it must be obsolete. Let’s forget that it won 2 world wars and many other military conflicts.

    • @NoTimeForThatNow
      @NoTimeForThatNow 3 года назад +6

      @@totallyfrozen facts that cant be denied have no expiration date.

    • @TheRealZJE313
      @TheRealZJE313 3 года назад +1

      Yes they underestimate that 230grain hunk of metal just because the velocity is that high.

    • @357-swagnumultramagax9
      @357-swagnumultramagax9 3 года назад +1

      I see old timers at my gun range all with 45 1911s and that’s enough proof for me , I think they’re veterans too since I live close to a marine base .

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад

      Underrated ? Even amongst 9mm fans , few if any will claim that .45acp is ineffective . Their counterargument is that latest generation 9mn ammo is almost as good as .45 , but higher capacity, and easier for inexperienced shooters to shoot accurately combine to make 9mm a good choice for a pistol averaged out .

  • @hachogonzalez8649
    @hachogonzalez8649 3 года назад +12

    Im just curious - how many pople are killed by a bullet from a gun due to over penetration each year? Great vid btw - all your stuff are top notch !

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +6

      Thanks. Probably none or single digit. But it's good to take a look at the science behind it, no pun intended.

    • @totallyfrozen
      @totallyfrozen 3 года назад +7

      Honestly, I have really heard of any. I think the issue is law suits and criminal charges. If your round over penetrates and hit someone, they’re likely to sue you into poverty.

    • @keithgraham9547
      @keithgraham9547 3 года назад +3

      You hear about kids and bystanders shot all the time, like Chicago every week. Who knows how many are grazes of the intended target, then the bullet passes through walls.
      In Louisville in the Breanna Taylor case, cops were fuck ups. They got a no-knock warrant for an apartment their perp hadn't lived in for almost a year or more. The boyfriend, licensed CCW holder, thought it was a home invasion and fired.
      Cops are shooting unarmed, blindly, through doors and walls, killed the girl who was in bed. (EMT for the city.) Shots went into neighboring apartment.
      The state law shielded the cops from having killed her and wounding the boyfriend, but were charged with I believe wanton endangerment of people in the other apartment.
      You probably don't get a lot of "it went through the entire body and kept on going hot." Your big danger is in grace wounds or a less than solid hit, and it keeps going.
      Or, you miss and it goes through walls and hits someone.
      I think all the CCW carriers who want "the most powerful round ever made" are dumbasses. You don't need that; you endanger bystanders which may include your family; you are NOT law enforcement; and you have no immunity from "oops."
      IMO, using the FBI standard for self-defense use is incorrect. Your job is defend and break contact if feasible, not shoot it out with armored hordes of perps.
      Just my opinion

  • @KNiteshft
    @KNiteshft 3 года назад +1

    Sam your editing in this video is great. I say +2 it was better than a +1. Yehaa from East TN

  • @plasticglock
    @plasticglock 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for the vid Sam! Keep these interesting tests coming I love it! I have been interested to know which fmj's would do the most damage. Having seen both do you think the 45 or the 10mm did the most damage in the block? That first 10mm shot looked impressive in the gel.

  • @dinsixiengmay9781
    @dinsixiengmay9781 2 года назад +1

    Love your content you got a sub 👍

  • @mmccarthy9458
    @mmccarthy9458 2 года назад +2

    The penetration of the 45 ACP FMJ really surprised me. The 10 MM FMJ not so much given the enormous power. The test confirmed the Kinetic AT in 45 ACP is absolutely ideal for self-defense. That and the 9mm JHP rounds with something like HST have the ideal limit for penetration.

  • @michaelcummings6178
    @michaelcummings6178 2 года назад +1

    GOOD JOB !

  • @lanedexter6303
    @lanedexter6303 3 года назад +3

    Interesting! Seems FMJ likes to penetrate, regardless of caliber. Way back in the day, old timers liked to say “they all fall to ball,” usually referring to the .45 ACP. But in those days, choices were pretty much limited to ball and a couple of hollow points & soft points that didn’t work. Today, we have great defensive bullets. If I had to fall back on post apocalyptic scrounging, I’d want the big calibers and I’d probably be casting bullets.

  • @bushman979
    @bushman979 3 года назад +1

    Great video enjoy and appreciate your content and time

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thank you

  • @manbearpig2400
    @manbearpig2400 3 года назад +7

    I would be curious to see what the velocity of a 7.62x25 round would be after passing through the gel. Great video as always thanks!

  • @jameslogan6127
    @jameslogan6127 3 года назад +2

    Great video exactly what I’ve been wondering about. I carry my M&P 2.0 in my truck with FMJ so now I’ll make sure I have at least one magazine of Speer Gold Dot. Frankly, I’m surprised I’m basically a novice shooter and worried less about over penetration and more concerned with bullet just passing through with minimal damage - although the vehicle carry is because I’m thinking I might have to shoot through medal or glass or whatever 🤔
    Anyway you’ve given me a lot to think about. Very cool video by the way. Still I missed that bologna pack 😃

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад +1

      Among the fairly small subset of knowledgeable people who at least occasionally consider the concept of on purpose having mags on hand with different ammo for different purposes, the overwhelming practice is for expanding ammo in the gun , and dedicated penetrator ammo in additional magazine .

  • @nathanlambshead4778
    @nathanlambshead4778 3 года назад +1

    Interesting test. I was thinking, maybe for this one, put some MDF on the back said also, to represent the ribs at the back of a person.

  • @CommunismiEstCacas
    @CommunismiEstCacas 3 года назад +5

    I think most FMJs slide through tissues and lose less energy but in human body we have some dense bones that could make them drop all their energy.

    • @maxtheroofer8004
      @maxtheroofer8004 3 года назад +3

      this is why he includes the fiberboard in the testing!

  • @riggerspoon8582
    @riggerspoon8582 2 года назад +2

    Yeah this is why I run 10mm 180g hollow point vs fmj.

  • @jeffjackson5331
    @jeffjackson5331 3 года назад +3

    Cool test.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Thanks!

    • @jeffjackson5331
      @jeffjackson5331 3 года назад +1

      @@GunSam you are very welcome! I just finished watching your 357 mag 44mag comparison video. I loved it. I use a Taurus Raging Bull in 44mag with Win 240 gr SJSP and the Hornady 240gr hollow points when i go deer hunting.

  • @YellowHammer26
    @YellowHammer26 3 года назад +1

    Good info, thanks

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Thanks for watching!

  • @carlosmorris4510
    @carlosmorris4510 Год назад +1

    Nice test... An innocent bystander; don't hit the innocent bystander! 😄

  • @durango8882
    @durango8882 3 года назад +2

    New subscriber. 👏🏻👍🏻

  • @bafumat
    @bafumat 3 года назад +1

    In my own testing .380 FMJ Or HP that fail to expand were the only loads that penetrate deeply enough. Testing was on deer and hogs. And they did not exit.

  • @seangrover140
    @seangrover140 11 месяцев назад

    Very interesting video! Would love to see this with other calibers 380, 9mm, 357, 22mag

  • @filianablanxart8305
    @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад +1

    Yes , 246gr .44spl chrono's @ 696fps from my 4 inch actual .44spl , so that Fiochi .44Rus is duplicating standard .44spl ammo .

  • @thetoneknob4493
    @thetoneknob4493 Год назад +1

    45acp 230grn ball ammo has its merits as a carry option. it preforms well at med to long range wear a hollow point goes below expansion threshold. it also dose pretty well threw barriers. its an accurate load and its what is most commonly practiced with at the range.

  • @nightvan4427
    @nightvan4427 3 года назад +1

    Good job
    Thanks

  • @Kratos_God_of_50_BMG
    @Kratos_God_of_50_BMG 3 года назад +3

    Great test man, interesting results for sure. I have Underwood ammo, 155gr 10mm that has some serious kick to it, but I has no chronograph to give an accurate stat. All I do know, is that out of a 5” barrel on a solid steel 1911
    it’s still got a punch to it! That’s out of my Rock Island Ultra FS HC: 16+1 of 10mm. Other than my S&W 629, It’s my trail gun during bear/moose season!

    • @TheRealZJE313
      @TheRealZJE313 3 года назад

      Why not a Desert Eagle in 44mag it has the recoll of a nine?and u get 8+1 of 44mag of any bullet weight u want and u can do reload pretty fast

    • @Kratos_God_of_50_BMG
      @Kratos_God_of_50_BMG 3 года назад

      @@TheRealZJE313 yeeeeah I can't $1200+ maybe after tax returns! Besides I know 2 people that own two different models of D.E and they both called theirs "jam-o-matics," so if I had the money I would just stick to the 44mag instead of .50AE

    • @TheRealZJE313
      @TheRealZJE313 3 года назад

      @@Kratos_God_of_50_BMG that's what I have 44 and tested out the extra mags that I have bought and no no jamming

    • @ariesmight6978
      @ariesmight6978 Год назад

      @@Kratos_God_of_50_BMG One of the main reasons for them jamming up. Is the poorly made magazines. Secondly improper holding of the hand gun itself. There are people who have tweeked the Desert Eagle up. And ran at least 10,000 rounds through it. I would not mind the .44 version myself. Or even in revolver, then maybe .460 Roland.

  • @TheWalterKurtz
    @TheWalterKurtz Год назад +1

    Your best video.

  • @maverickpaladin4155
    @maverickpaladin4155 Год назад

    Interesting concept testing. I'd be curious to see how calibers like .32 ACP, .25 ACP, 9x18 Mak, and other pocket gun calibers (sub 9mm power) compare FMJ vs JHP.

  • @archienagle9066
    @archienagle9066 3 года назад +1

    👍Gained really useful info thank you. ♥️🇺🇸♾

  • @CLSharpman5000
    @CLSharpman5000 3 года назад +6

    Whoa, new intro?

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +5

      Slight song change lol

  • @jasonkeating9958
    @jasonkeating9958 5 месяцев назад

    A test with the solid copper extreme defender type rounds would be an obvious type to test

  • @rockjohnson2879
    @rockjohnson2879 2 года назад

    Back in 1977 I was issued ball 38 spl. 158 grain. Model 10. Seen many of pass through on bad guys shoulder and leg shots . Seen 45 fmj do a pass through on officer. No vitals were hit. Pelvic area. 1day in hospital 1 week at home.also Same 38 spl ammo would not penetrate the back window of a 66 Chevy pickup..5 hits. One 9mm super vel.( remember those hot rods) penetrated the back window window and struck bad guy in lower base of skull and lodged in sinus cavity. Bad guy lived. I never except a JHP to expand on a bad guy as they do in jell test. Keep shooting until they drop. I

  • @alexanderlevy158
    @alexanderlevy158 Год назад +1

    Damn, I was missing seeing the plywood after the 10mm fmj.

  • @jamescorfield534
    @jamescorfield534 6 месяцев назад

    I used to call the flat tip 45s ‘Show Stoppers’

  • @oldschoolcop8568
    @oldschoolcop8568 3 года назад +2

    Well I’m definitely surprised 😲 at the results.

  • @ariesmight6978
    @ariesmight6978 Год назад

    Hello Gun Sam is the semi auto the same Glock. That you used in your previous video? And if so, did you solve its malfunction issues? If so how?

  • @danoneill2846
    @danoneill2846 3 года назад +2

    I think this 45 HP will be my new carry round

  • @Fudmottin
    @Fudmottin 3 года назад +3

    Unless it tumbles, all the ball ammo seems to ice pick. I still wouldn't want a hole poked in me though!

  • @martinkavanagh9641
    @martinkavanagh9641 3 года назад +1

    Yeah Mr Gun_Sam .. you are raising interesting questions & some answers. - I shoot on range regularly and favor "easy shooting stuff" like 32 H&R Magnum in my 327 Fed Magnum Ruger SP 101 .. BUT thinking 'horses for courses' maybe a 40/45 is better-best for urban self defense?? - As REALLY - Is overpenetration such a huge consideration when e.g. 80% of rounds fired by cops MISS anyway? Lead wadcutter 38s alternated forwards and backwards might be very effective?
    - Loving your work from down here in New Zealand.

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      I am very interested to see what .327 Federal Magnum or other .32's do. I am a little hesitant to do full out tests with is as I only own one snub in .327.

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад +1

      Not quite sure the direction of Mr Kavanah's inquiry ?
      Like Sam , I have a fondness for a good .32 , and with the right loads they perform better than most shooters would expect .
      That said , is .45acp a better defensive caliber ? Absolutely ! ( Presuming there are no medical/ physical issues requiring only very minimal recoil .)
      Pass through injure or kill an unseen bystander , or fellow good guy manuvered to flanking position and in wrong place at wrong time ? Doesn't happen often , but occurrence is more than Zero .
      But why FMJ and not jhp in the big bore ? Does the pistol only function with FMJ ? Is this dual purpose for use against both Felons and Large Animals ? Is FMJ a New Zealand requirement ?

  • @B0N3ZNP3WZ
    @B0N3ZNP3WZ 3 года назад +1

    I wish you would have tested the 45 more than just once with fmjs. Curious about penetration with them touching.

  • @josephgeorgeejr7039
    @josephgeorgeejr7039 2 года назад

    You forgot the horrified look on the bystanders face lmao!

  • @jamespugh
    @jamespugh 3 года назад +1

    Pretty good video. Definitely don't carry fmj out 22lr or 22mag. I stay more to hollowpoints

  • @matthewanderson9912
    @matthewanderson9912 3 года назад +2

    Nice video. I’d be interested to see what a jacketed soft point in 357 magnum and 44 magnum would do. I would think maybe they would give some expansion.

    • @thinktwice8860
      @thinktwice8860 3 года назад

      I’ve seen some tests on that. Over penetrates. I can’t remember how far.

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад +1

      I can answer that from personal experience ( on game) with .357 158 JSP . ( From a rifle , which w ould cause expansion , if anything ever would .)
      It doesn't expand . I penetrates a LOT , measured in feet , not inches . ( Lengthwise thru a Boar)

  • @lcifermorningstar191
    @lcifermorningstar191 3 года назад +1

    Awesome 😎

  • @agave1314
    @agave1314 3 месяца назад

    Great Tests Thank You 🐸✝️

  • @danoman5217
    @danoman5217 Год назад

    HP ammo became popular in the 1970s. Most projectiles have been a hard cast lead for 100 plus years. FMJ and hard cast ball work.

  • @wookie_wagen
    @wookie_wagen 11 месяцев назад

    I would like to see this test with 45 auto/+p with FN FMJ/TMJ. I've read that FN match bullets usually have thicker jackets than regular ball

  • @ericbergfield6451
    @ericbergfield6451 3 года назад +1

    I'll be going to be buying my first firearm (CP33 - .22lr) in the next 2 months. ...& after I get the CP33, I'll be taking my friend's 9mm Taurus (of ten years old) with me to the range!

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +1

      Definitely an interesting firearm. One type of handgun that no one regrets getting for their first handgun is a really big and heavy 9mm pistol, the other thing is a really big .357/.38 revolver that you shoot .38 Special in, and another is like you chose a .22 LR of some sort. I just bought the first .22 LR pistol I have had in about 7 years, and i'm excited again. There's something very fun about .22 LR.

  • @DanTheWolfman
    @DanTheWolfman 3 года назад +3

    Baddie needs clothing on back...most bullets drop out of back elastic skin angle towards ground. Would like more .45 ball...maybe compared to. 380 and 9mm and. 32 magnum. Over penetration doesn't happen in civilian cases and most past le military were from NATO ball from mp5s

  • @leonardmarciano4444
    @leonardmarciano4444 2 года назад

    Would FMJ ammo be the best for 22 mag revolver and rifle since 22 mag ammo doesn't expand but FMJ would get good penetration? This is the round I'm most accuate and comfortable shootingt right now,

  • @JMBAmericanIronShallNotBeInfri
    @JMBAmericanIronShallNotBeInfri 10 месяцев назад +1

    With the current prices of ammo being ridiculously high right now, ESPECIALLY what is traditionally considered to be handgun self defence ammo, remember FMJ 45 acp (HARDBALL) ammo works just fine to stop the threat!
    In fact, I'll take 230gr. hardball for self defence any day. I want the penetration in a .45 caliber size projectile! A proven man stopper in real world shootouts in 45 acp for over 100 years, not to mention the long history of the .45 in Long colt caliber used in the wild west to dispatch many a bad guy or hostile Indian. And you get the added benefit of using the ammo you actually train with so you know exactly how it functions in your firearm and point of impact on your target, be it paper or human! Just sayin...

  • @craigbenz4835
    @craigbenz4835 11 месяцев назад

    Have you done this test with 38 Spl 158 LRN standard pressure or 9mm 124 FMJ?

  • @mkshffr4936
    @mkshffr4936 10 месяцев назад

    As I mentioned on another video the Ruskie is worth a bit of a deep dive. The case size is perfect for smokeless powder and soft lead projectiles. It xan exhibit exceptional accuracy and efficiency.

  • @oubliette862
    @oubliette862 6 месяцев назад

    I've been interested in seeing a comparison between the 3 main bottle neck rounds, 7.62x25tokarev, 357sig, and 40super. I have a good idea what the result will be, but you never know. it would be interesting regardless. I believe shiny lead is the soft stuff.

  • @andyphelps3064
    @andyphelps3064 3 года назад +2

    Have you done these test with smaller calibers, that would be fun like 22, 22 mag, 32 acp, and any of those type calibers im talking FMJ even going into like 327 and all that and seeing if any of them over penetrate

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      Not yet, but i'd love to.

  • @TxJK18
    @TxJK18 3 года назад +2

    I have been shooting 44 russian lately too. Love that round on my 629 6 1/2 full underlug is like shooting a 22. Do you happen to know if i can shoot also 44 colt?? The local store has quite a few boxes of that Black Hills ammo

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +2

      I have actually never heard of .44 Colt, as it looks a little less common. I do not know if there is a modern load of it, but the info listed shows a 45 caliber bullet. The case looks like it would fit, as well as it looks like the bullet would fit in the chamber too. But, I would not do it until I researched it more.

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад +1

      Modern ".44 Colt " , yes you can ! It is essentially midway in case length between .44Spl and .44Rus .
      Historical .44Colt as introduced circa 1871 , and produced sporadically until WWII , used a Heel type .45 bullet . ( Likewise the very similar .44 Remington from the 1870s .)

  • @MrSearay1962
    @MrSearay1962 3 года назад +1

    Like the new intro music. Thanks for another great video

  • @MultiDryder
    @MultiDryder 3 года назад +1

    I have always figured overpenetration is a myth and this video explains it

  • @robertzeurunkl8401
    @robertzeurunkl8401 Год назад

    Doing the "fours", but mo .40SW? Isn't that one of the more popular "fours" for EDC?

  • @WImob420
    @WImob420 3 года назад +4

    IDK buddy shot himself(graze wound) was a .45ACP hollow point. we recovered the round. it did not expand at all. got stuck in between the floor and the ceiling below. (old house build around late 1800's) was just ODD.....

    • @GunSam
      @GunSam  3 года назад +5

      Yeah, that may be another test. Impacting wood, sheet rock etc can make some rounds much different than others. Like, 9mm VS .45 i'm gonna say 9mm penetrates through way more of a house, but in jelly like humans a .45 might penetrate more.

    • @herewardthewatchful1014
      @herewardthewatchful1014 3 года назад +2

      I have an old thick mahogany bed in my burn pile that at suicidal man once shot a 45 acp into several times before taking his own life. Surprisingly I found a few lodged in the front bedpost after he fired from the back.

    • @falcon6995
      @falcon6995 2 года назад +1

      Considering you said it was a graze wound, the bullet probably didn't hit enough flesh to expand. Lucky for him it didn't though.🙏

  • @elvyfoster7455
    @elvyfoster7455 3 года назад

    How about a video of subsonic or low recoil versions of fmj for various calibers as defense ammo?

    • @filianablanxart8305
      @filianablanxart8305 3 года назад

      That would be a solution unsuccessfully begging for a question .

  • @theoriginalOSOK
    @theoriginalOSOK 11 месяцев назад

    So if you want to be able to take out two bad guys with one shot, you'd be best armed with a 10MM fmj. lol