I appreciate they are a sponsor but I'd like to see you do a 10gbps speedtest with the VPN ON, I'd be surprised if you can get close to 1 gigabit out of any vpn on the market
yes you all been getting scammed for 15 years , took you long enough!!!! oh also vpn another scam antivirus another scam password managing software yet another scam!!!!!! most RUclips content creators con artists n sake oil salesmen, even the so called reputable ones!!!!! flat earthrs just con artists wasting ur time as they r fakn it for views oh n lastly all the services u get for free was your electricity internet r tv free??? also we should be paid for the time advertisers steal from our lives!!!!
@@zaineoakley5555 I downloaded it. Lol _(Just kidding I have fairly fast cable, but if I did still have dial-up, downloading this video would take around an hour, best case scenario.)_
As a core Network Engineer at an ISP I have to say out of the dozens of tech RUclipsrs I watch, I have to hand it out to you for putting effort into your network videos. Sure some points/info are off, but still contain a lot of good information for non-networking viewers. If you continue these I'd be glad to offer some perspective. Some things to add: 1. In your list of equipment you forgot the most important, a router able to handle 10gig. Switching ASICs have been able to handle 10gig for some time but many routers (non-enterprise) still route in CPU instead of the ASIC. This makes routing and also firewalling very expensive at 10gig and above. 2. Latency through a medium, copper is actually lower latency theoretically, but there is an interference mechanism that purposely introduces latency to prioritize a stable connect vs a low latency connect that might suffer loss. 3. The actual nodes introduce ns of latency enough to the point where the number of nodes is ignored vs the path taken. 4. Traceroute off a customer connection in not the end all be all result. MPLS is the primary transport within ISP domains. You will not get replies from hops that are traversing MPLS nodes. This can mean a user is seeing 5 hops but in reality it can be 5-10 more hops than displayed. This can skew the perceived results. 5. Latency is TCPs Achilles heal. Due to ACKs and windowing is what determines the throughput you will get. The more latency, means the longer the sender has to wait before sending the next window. If you ran a 10gig test with UDP you would see closer to expected results at expense of possible loss.
I try my best when I put these videos together but it's so hard to cover all the bases without getting so "gotcha" and what not. That said, I appreciate the friendly praise and excellent list of additions/corrections! Cheers.
4. i don't have familiarity with other ISPs, but i don't know if MPLS is really all that ubiquitous for every single inter-AS traffic. AFAIK it's reserved mostly to specialized services like point-to-point (or point-to-multipoint and multipoint-to-multipoint) links. also, you do see all the hops in MPLS, you just don't know where the failure is in case there is one since the packet goes all the way to the end (the popping of the label) before being able to come back (and latency for every hop will be the same as the last one, assuming it's not dropped). in fact, this is one of the reasons it's avoided unless really needed, as it makes troubleshooting that much more annoying. what you might be referencing regarding hiding th hops are MPLS-based VPN tunnels, which as any other tunnel do in fact hide the underlying network hop layer, but like i said, these are mostly used for PtP services, such as clients that want to hire a VPLS link between multiple sites.
@Snazzy Labs Completely understandable. My comment came off as one of those “well actually Snazzy” but was unintended to as theres always those comments lol. Networking, software, hardware and devices in general are all very deep topics and RUclipsrs such as yourself and LTT cover such a wide range of tech that its impossible to know the ins and out of all of it. That is where my praise came from that you put time to research and reach out to your ISP in previous videos to get a decent understanding. It brings me joy when channels take the time like that and deserve praise, especially with a two man band and top notch quality.
Aadi Pandey most of the ISP’s are transmitted through a US-owned channel. So basically tie the United States has the world data at their hands. And yes I am a computer engineer grad of 2015.
So glad our tax dollars helped those 3000 Norwegians watch porn. LOL. But in all seriousness, I would guess that means NOAA has a weather station in Svalbard?
Fiber is hollow, the light is bouncing off the sides of the glass inside the fiber, not travelling through the glass at all. So it's traveling through air.
@@jordanwhitecar1982 wat? you need to get a refund on your education. optical fibre relies on total internal reflection in the "glass" fibre due to the different refractive index.
That's why they make NVMe cards like the Aorus Gen 4 AIC so you can split 16 PCIe lanes into 4 4x lanes and RAID the NVMe drives for theoretically 28GB/s R/W
@@kaldogorath Funny... I actually seriously considered doing this myself but then I managed to convince myself not to. I mean how fast do I really need Overwatch to load. LOL
@@CrimsonRegalia I do not think going for really high end nvme ssd makes your game load noticeably faster. Heck even on a sata ssd its fast to the point you don't even know if you're on nvme or ssd.
@@XxXnonameAsDXxX It's not about whether or not you can notice the difference. It's about who can insta-lock their favorite hero at the start of a match even if it is just 1 or 2 seconds... LOL (I never said I had a practical reason)
I usually mentally divide a megabit/second speed by ten to allow for packet overhead (headers, checksums etc) to give me a more realistic megabyte/second rate. Also, telecomms is weird, sometimes the speed is not mibibytes/second as in 1024 x 1024, but it can be 1000x1024 or 1000x1000 depending on the underlying clocks driving the actual signalling on the line.
Comcast laughed, knowing they signed an exclusivity agreement and I can only choose them or AT&T and also knowing AT&Ts prices. Jerks. Thinking about starting up my own ISP off 5G cellular service.
Cable companies won't be laughing long.. StarLink Public Beta is about to launch. After years of abusing us, cable companies are soon about to be throwing themselves on the grounds kicking and screaming begging for government handouts.. Like the exclusive contracts and rights to control entire cities wasn't enough..
Did you clean it with eucalyptus oil? It would give at least 10% speed increase :) 1Gbps for home router/needs I think should be the standard nowadays.
@@laurinneff4304 Wrong. Heavily modded minecraft servers can take an average of 3Mbit/s at only 4 active players, bursting up to 40Mbit/s at certain locations/loading chunks. Vanilla servers takes about less. 4 Mbit/s for about 8 active players. Bursting up to 30Mbit/s on heavy loads. Having servers with lots of concurrent players present bandwidth problems. Loading chunks fast enough can result into an internet DDoS if your port speed is that low.
To be precise: Svalbard is not only home to 3000 people, but also to the world seed vault, where samples of nearly every fruit, vegetable, etc are stored, to keep humanity able to grow food in case of a Desaster. So this small Island is ptettty important to be connected
Cant even Saturate my 100Mbit Connection through BattleNETs Server. May be different in the US, but here in Germany, especially when there was/is an Update for Warzone, u can go and wait for some time to get that thing Downloaded.
when you realize the speeds are just theoretical for the sake of flexing, you won't get that 10 Gigabit no ANYWHERE else except the speedtest server lol
Svalbard is not only home to 3000 people, it also houses the Arctic Web Archive, the offline backup of the internet. A fast connection seems like a great investment.
This video demonstrates how important it's a good ISP. these days. Good interconnections with cloud providers and CDNs, great transit providers to the broader internet, and, most importantly, upgrading the core and the edge networks in order to sell faster speeds are, together, a key factor for selling very high speeds. It's quite easy to provide one gig, two gigs, or even more with the access gear we have today. XGS-PON is coming, and "10 gig" is the next big step. But, in practice, it's not 10 gigs if you can't use 20% of your bandwidth to download a game from Steam of from Xbox servers, nether can you retrieve a file from Google Drive at anything near the speeds you pay for. Of course, it's not all about the ISP, because the global internet operators need to work on this together on this issue. It's definitively possible and, frankly, quite easy. The challenge is, of course, money. And we are not good to go thought this by selling crazy-fast speeds for everyone. Fine, most people don't care about it. Paying $70 for 1-Gig and only receiving 200-Meg most of the time is miles better than paying $70 for a line capped at 200-Meg. However, if we want to take full advantage of theses speeds and not just experiencing a small improvement over slower ones, choosing a good ISP, with a fast backbone, vast interconnections running on fast interfaces (10G for less relevant traffic and 100G for relevant peers), and other points I sad is very necessary. Anyway, loved your video. The only RUclipsr I saw talking about the challenges of today's "ultra-fast" broadband.
A lot has to do with internet routing. I do not live in a major metropolitan area and the nearest one is 300 miles away. I manage IT at my company and both offices have Fiber Internet and are only 70 miles apart. However, due to being two different ISP's and this not being a major metropolitan area, the data has to travel 1000+ miles round trip, putting the ping times for our site to site VPN at around 60ms. My house that is 7 miles from the main office has around a 40ms ping time due to a 600+ mile round trip. The "city" is a beach community and only has two data routes (regardless of ISP) and that is either east or west as there is nothing to our north. When Hurricane Michael took out Panama City Beach, it also took our all fiber optic lines to our east, leaving only the ones to our west. During the repairs, there were a couple fiber cuts to our west, cutting off our "city" entirely. AT&T had a fiber cut which took down all the cell phone towers in the city... all AT&T phones simply said "No Service" for 3-5 hours, same happened with AT&T U-Verse as well. The same thing happened with Mediacom... took out Cable Internet, VoIP, and Cable TV for nearly a week due to how severe the cut was. 100 Mbps Fiber for our primary office, located in the middle of downtown, is $450 a month on a 5 year contract. 100 Mbps Fiber for our remote office is $550 a month. The fastest internet AT&T offers at my house is 50 Mbps for $50 a month on a 2 year contract, but thankfully Cox offers Gigablast which is 940 Mbps down and 35 Mbps up for $69 a month with a 1 TB limit and $50 extra for unlimited data which is what I have. Thankfully I am able to get these speeds and since Steam has servers in Atlanta, where my ping time is around 25ms or so, I can nearly max out my connection downloading games from Steam. Needless to say, there is no data centers anywhere near us due to this being a small beach community and in the middle of Hurricane Alley.
If you would like to see full details of a webpage load. Open up the developer tools / console of your web browser and navigate to the "Network" section. Load a web page and view the resulting waterfall chart. It will give you a detailed breakdown of the time it takes for establishing the initial connection, DNS lookup, SSL handshakes, content download etc etc. Will also tell you which items were found in your browsers cache (local cache) or downloaded from a CDN service (remote cache).
"Cat. 6a cables are expensive" What?, they are the standard when building or upgrading a building. Most people even go cat 7 or even cat 8 and just crimp on rj45 (cat.6)
Yeah I was in a construction site some time agk and talked to the electrician guys there. I was really surprised that they wired cat6, but it's super great.
@@lilkittygirl At a local shop cat 6 costs 0,78€/m, cat 6a costs 0,72€/m and cat 7 is 0,98€/m (currently on sale cheaper than cat 6). (All prices at 100m) Online they are normally all cheaper but whith similar margins between each other. And yes cat 6a is the standart and nobody really buys or should buy cat 6.
13:39 Can I make a suggestion? It's not always better to change DNS servers, you should benchmark them to get a baseline. You can use tools like namebench or GRCs DNS Benchmark to do exactly that :D You also have to consider the fact that DNS is very important for CDN delivery and load balancing/geolocation, if the DNS servers you are using don't support ECS you might get contents from the "wrong" (far away/more congested/not customized by your ISP) location
I’m from Norway. It was cool to see that you used a clip from the show «Ikke gjør dette hjemme» by NRK. Cool to see people use stuff made in Norway. Puts us on the map a little bit more. Keep up the good work, Quinn!☺️
I have Google Fiber and I've begun to notice what servers are slower than others- I don't even know if I'd move to the 2Gbps service when it comes out.
I've installed quite a few circuits for businesses and it's only the IT guys who complain and want faster speeds. I've found with a burstable 100 megabit/sec circuit the servers you connect to often rate-limit you down anyway.
I have FIOS gigabit, and what I found to be the biggest issue is just latency. DNS is one place, the second and perhaps more important is just having the right router that shapes traffic well. Gigabit can feel like 50 Mbps if you have buffer bloat. Why, well that DNS request and other requests get held up in a buffer causing pages and actions to appear to be delayed, well and they are. Fix the bloat and it's amazing how fast even a slower connection can feel. Knowing this is one thing, making sure you ensure each setup is working as good as it can be is another. 10Gb, well shouldn't have any buffer issues.
You're not a network guy... ;-) You're info is a little off, but I still enjoyed it. The biggest thing you misunderstood is that those "traceroutes" aka. hops are not necessarily real in today's world. When you see 10 hops, their could be a dozen more behind the scenes due to technologies like PPPoE, MPLS, etc that can make those hops invisible.
Set your dns to googles dns server. It will direct your upload to a local server instead of the standard upload distribution server. Make sure to flush dns cache and local cookies before testing the upload.
A few points. I have only once come across a 10 Gb connection. It was for a major bank's data centre. Canadian banks tend to be much larger than American banks. By comparison, back in the early 90s, I was working on a job for another major bank. They had one data centre in Toronto and another in a different city. This project was to provide 4 DS3 (45 Mb each) connections between the two sites, with two coming from my company and two from the phone company. That was a blazing 180 Mb/s between two bank data centres! On the other hand, when I first started working in telecom, some of the equipment I worked on ran at all of 45.4 bit/sec! Also, with my ISP, I'm paying for 500/20 Mb. However, according to speedtest I get around 940/31! So, no complaints there. And just this morning, I decided to check a 5G C band (3.5 GHz) cell connection and was getting around 436/78 with my Pixel 6 phone.
From Hawaii, I like to speed test to San Francisco to test my connection through the cables. I typically lose about 30-40 percent of my download speed when doing that.
TCP overhead takes away from your overall upload speed. In addition providers along the path can rate-limit youtube very easily and RUclips rate limits uploads as well. Also, "pathping" is a better tester built into Windows.
I'm still blown away i finally have 30-60Mpbits/sec down and 20 up with T-Mobile, out in the middle of nowhere. Of course, it took a Mofi-4500 SIM 7 modem, a couple of antennas that cost $300 each and a fiberglass pole, POE injector/splitter, Netgear AX3000 router and 300ft of Cat6e cable to make it work,but hey, it's only $20/mo for "unlimited". Before that it was 1mbits/sec DSL that was always dropping out. No other options including satellite because i'm up against a mountain which obstructs my view.
Good legal torrents to try are linux distros, some of them are seeded by properly fast connections like universities and other subjects serving as mirrors
I live in South OKC, and according to Ookla, the nearest SpeedTest server is in Richardson, TX, hosted by AT&T. However, there are several SpeedTest servers in OKC, hosted by OneNet, Dobson Technologies, and Cox Communications. Also, we have AT&T U-verse V-DSL, which would probably explain why the AT&T Richardson server is pinning as being closer than any of the ones in OKC served by their competitors. We've had the same ISP since early 2003, starting with SBC Yahoo! Dial, then upgrading to SBC Yahoo! A-DSL in late 2003 (which would become AT&T Yahoo! A-DSL after SBC Communications, Inc. acquired AT&T Corp. in 2004 to become AT&T, Inc.), followed by an upgrade to AT&T U-verse V-DSL in 2013. Also, Alphabet, Inc. has a Google data center in Mayes County, OK right near the northeast corner of the state.
@@zaineoakley5555 Where I live, people who have 10 meg get it as government assistance internet or get it as a reduced price. I get the old 30 meg plan because I complained that the "1 speed for all plan" from Spectrum without getting fiber was too expensive.
Spectrum is the worst here in So Cali. They keep raising my bill ever 3-4 months. Have called multiple times and they refuse to help. They just want to sign me up to a more expensive plan. Ugh
Spectrum has been really good to me in my experience. What exactly are the issues you were having? If I ever have an issue with spectrum it's almost alaays intermittent connection
Just an FYI, and Not meant as a Gotcha. Something important about how fast you can upload to a place like Google Drive, RUclips, or anywhere else also depends on the Download speeds available of the servers hosting the service you are trying to access, and their upload speed when you are downloading something. The server could have a 10Gb connection to it as well, but limits are put in place per session so one user is not allowed to "Hog" the bandwidth. This is for security and user experience It prevents against simple attacks from hackers that may take place, and allows for more people to be able to access the features they want on the site as well. This was a great explanation that is easy to understand.
A Ookla Speedtest server is not only selected by physical location. The Ookla system determines the best server by using a geo-IP system to find the physically closest servers, then your client pings those servers and uses the one with the lowest latency, making the selected server the closest server from a network perspective. So not necessarily the physically closest, but the quickest to respond.
Here in Egypt the internet is so expensive and they give a tiny amount of data cap, even after getting ftth in some places(not all of course) the fastest you can get is 200 mb/s but with 1024gb cap and the upload is not even close to half that for almost 70$.If you look it up in Egypt it's a monopoly. I don't think caps will disappear from Egypt anytime soon.
"This is what most non-fiber homes have" Copper and that 40ms of lag!11!! my old dsl connection:150ms to 500ms your internet:5ms Me:If the ISPs actually did something with that money related to fiber.
13:16 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I remember hearing somewhere that piracy is only illegal if you are publishing the content, like if you are uploading a movie online for a free download, but if you are just downloading that movie, you will be fine.
As an internet tech support rep I literally spend 10 hours a day explaining this to people. It’s crazy how few people realize how the internet actually works. Don’t even get me started on wifi either...
At 9:50, cloudflare also acts as a reverse proxy for sites so you will never know the actual ip address of the fiver server, it will always be cloudflare's ip. So even if cloudflare didn't cache the request, you will only see cloudflare's ip.
Throughput and bandwdith also rings true for your broadband speed and what rate your router can up/download. Just because your router has gigabit ports does not mean it can upload or download at gigabit speeds. I remember some time ago I had to choose carefully my router as most would have a lower actual throughput than the actual broadband speed.
Here in Jersey channel island, the telecoms company finished their rollout of fibre (ftth) to all 100k+ residents. During the pandemic they have given every single household 1Gbps symmetrical connection for free, as long as they are already paying for a standard service.
I live in Toronto, Canada. I have the top tier of Rogers Internet. it's advertised at 1Gbit/s but can only get 300 mbit/s due to modem constraints (also have fastest modem available). Upload speed is attrocious at 15 mbit/s. There literally is nothing faster available in Canada. Who ever makes this kind of speed available in Canada should get a blank cheque.
As someone who does networking for a living, I get this complaint about network speed all the time. Most websites don't have more than a gigabit connection ( and they're not just sending data to you, so that has to be split between everyone accessing their site ), some only have 100 megabit ( still more common than one would think in this day and age ). Not to mention every stop along the way from your computer to their server. You may get routed over a slow pipe which probably won't effect your bandwidth much since even a slow pipe is still probably faster than your home connection, but depending on how congested it is, it may seriously effect your latency. The server may be in a remote place, or in a place where natural disasters ( such as hurricanes, or massive fires ) are effecting the ability of the local networking infrastructure to provide as much throughput as might be normally available if large portions of their network weren't down as a result. And that still doesn't take into account how much of your traffic is going over high speed low latency fiber, and how much is going over more traditional copper. Not to mention latency introduced when switching between the two mediums in addition to the normal latency from each additional hop. It gets really crazy, and it's really a miracle that the internet even works at all at times.
When one of your handful of highly respected RUclipsrs is not only in your same metropolitan area, but also on your same fiber ISP. Well done sir, well done!
At home I switch from Comcast 200Mb to 1Gb plan and saved money. Basically over the years my Comcast service had switch to more expensive a la cart pricing. All basically switch back to a plan and dropped some premium cable channels I rarely watched. I now get 1.4 Gb download. All consumer firewalls top out at 1Gb, so you will only see 950 Mb speedtests. I had to install a pfsense firewall with dual 10 Gb NICS. The cable modem is attached to the WAN port at 2.5Gb. The LAN port is attached at 10Gb. The best I have seen in consumer is 2.5Gb WAN and 1GB LAN. The NICS are actually what they call Multi-Gigabit NICS, they operrate at 10Gb, 5Gb, 2.5Gb, and 1Gb. The old 10 Gb NICS only operated at 10Gb and 1Gb. 10Gb NICS are expensive, so a lot of equipment is opting for cheaper 2.5Gb NICS. The secret wording is Multi-Gigabit. It took me awhile before I realized that.
There is a bit of a disconnect with this topic: At multi-gigbit speeds you might be limited to a small fraction for any single data connection, but likely can make use of multiple connections. For instance what if 1 person was uploading a youtube video, while another person was download a game, and another streaming via twitch or some other platform. Usually 10 Gbit is intended for many users sharing the same data pipe at the same time.
I got 1Gpbs filber here at home, I improved my network performance by: 1) Using a mikrotik router 2) changing all access points to tp-link ax APs 3) changing my ISP provided GPON ONT to a better quality model
@1:24 - Windows tip: if you click the menu lines in the top left of the built-in calculator you can do pretty much any conversion you want right in the app, including data conversions; it even supports date calculation of either difference between dates or figuring out dates in the future/past by adding/subtracting days, weeks, or months. I know it's hard to imagine Windows having good built in features, but hey, stranger things have happened outside of Mac land ;)
What grinds my gear the most is people that have a fiber connection calling their service-provided hardware modem, a modem, converts data from a digital format into a format suitable for an analog transmission medium such as telephone or radio. Most often it's just a darn switch with VLAN support.
At my home I threatened cancelling my 15mb/s (1,5mb/s download) internet plan and the retention said: Well, if you need better speeds, you can look elsewhere for it. We don’t have the infrastructure for more than 15mg/s for your home at the moment. We are so sorry to see you go, but there is nothing we can do about it. 🥺😐
Don't forget that the application server at the other end must have the resources available to handle your 10 Gbps of throughput. Very few are provisioned that way, because it is extremely costly at scale and unnecessary for most application requirements.
It also looks like you are using the Speedtest app and using a browser to run the transfer (naturally). Try running your speedtest from the browser and see what slowdowns it introduces.
10 Gbe has been affordable for a person at home for the last 5+ years. That is if you are willing to buy used enterprise hardware. About 8-9 years ago I bought 8 X 10 Gbe SFP+ single port cards and 5 X 10Gbe Dual Port SFP+ cards and ran fiber or copper SFP+ cables through my house. I used my HP server running ESXi as the switch to connect traffic to a computer running clear OS as a dedicated web appliance. I think all together I paid in the neighborhood of $500 for the cables and the cards not counting the server that I already had. That to me doesn't seem all that bad considering that some people spend $200+ on crap consumer wifi routers for their house that doesn't hold a candle to 4yo enterprise and even used DIY solutions.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Use my special link www.privateinternetaccess.com/snazzy to get 77% discount and 30-day money-back guarantee!
I appreciate they are a sponsor but I'd like to see you do a 10gbps speedtest with the VPN ON, I'd be surprised if you can get close to 1 gigabit out of any vpn on the market
Bottle necks before finishing the video just assuming
It looks like the page you were looking for isn't here anymore.
yes you all been getting scammed for 15 years , took you long enough!!!!
oh also vpn another scam
antivirus another scam
password managing software yet another scam!!!!!!
most RUclips content creators con artists n sake oil salesmen, even the so called reputable ones!!!!!
flat earthrs just con artists wasting ur time as they r fakn it for views
oh n lastly all the services u get for free
was your electricity internet r tv free???
also we should be paid for the time advertisers steal from our lives!!!!
link‘s not working sadly :(
sorry i'm late, someone was on the phone
Dial-up joke 😂
You know you're old when you know what he means... ! 😂
@@AndrewYPTang
**Puts hands to ear**
What?
But how did you whatch this with kilobit speed
@@zaineoakley5555 I downloaded it. Lol
_(Just kidding I have fairly fast cable, but if I did still have dial-up, downloading this video would take around an hour, best case scenario.)_
As a core Network Engineer at an ISP I have to say out of the dozens of tech RUclipsrs I watch, I have to hand it out to you for putting effort into your network videos. Sure some points/info are off, but still contain a lot of good information for non-networking viewers. If you continue these I'd be glad to offer some perspective.
Some things to add:
1. In your list of equipment you forgot the most important, a router able to handle 10gig. Switching ASICs have been able to handle 10gig for some time but many routers (non-enterprise) still route in CPU instead of the ASIC. This makes routing and also firewalling very expensive at 10gig and above.
2. Latency through a medium, copper is actually lower latency theoretically, but there is an interference mechanism that purposely introduces latency to prioritize a stable connect vs a low latency connect that might suffer loss.
3. The actual nodes introduce ns of latency enough to the point where the number of nodes is ignored vs the path taken.
4. Traceroute off a customer connection in not the end all be all result. MPLS is the primary transport within ISP domains. You will not get replies from hops that are traversing MPLS nodes. This can mean a user is seeing 5 hops but in reality it can be 5-10 more hops than displayed. This can skew the perceived results.
5. Latency is TCPs Achilles heal. Due to ACKs and windowing is what determines the throughput you will get. The more latency, means the longer the sender has to wait before sending the next window. If you ran a 10gig test with UDP you would see closer to expected results at expense of possible loss.
I try my best when I put these videos together but it's so hard to cover all the bases without getting so "gotcha" and what not. That said, I appreciate the friendly praise and excellent list of additions/corrections! Cheers.
4. i don't have familiarity with other ISPs, but i don't know if MPLS is really all that ubiquitous for every single inter-AS traffic. AFAIK it's reserved mostly to specialized services like point-to-point (or point-to-multipoint and multipoint-to-multipoint) links. also, you do see all the hops in MPLS, you just don't know where the failure is in case there is one since the packet goes all the way to the end (the popping of the label) before being able to come back (and latency for every hop will be the same as the last one, assuming it's not dropped). in fact, this is one of the reasons it's avoided unless really needed, as it makes troubleshooting that much more annoying. what you might be referencing regarding hiding th hops are MPLS-based VPN tunnels, which as any other tunnel do in fact hide the underlying network hop layer, but like i said, these are mostly used for PtP services, such as clients that want to hire a VPLS link between multiple sites.
@Snazzy Labs Completely understandable. My comment came off as one of those “well actually Snazzy” but was unintended to as theres always those comments lol. Networking, software, hardware and devices in general are all very deep topics and RUclipsrs such as yourself and LTT cover such a wide range of tech that its impossible to know the ins and out of all of it. That is where my praise came from that you put time to research and reach out to your ISP in previous videos to get a decent understanding. It brings me joy when channels take the time like that and deserve praise, especially with a two man band and top notch quality.
@@snazzy My Edge is connected to a 10G port on a 70Gbps+ BGP Blend ring here in SLC. Time for some testing.
TCP Reno!
Fun fact: NASA and the US weather service actually helped pay for the fiber from Norway to Svalbard
What's weird is that Norway acts as though it doesn’t receive any help from the U.S. Meanwhile we all know the US technically own the rest of world.
Jobs mine what are you talking about?
@@jobsmine wait , what ? US technically owns the rest of the world !!
How high are you mate ?
Aadi Pandey most of the ISP’s are transmitted through a US-owned channel. So basically tie the United States has the world data at their hands. And yes I am a computer engineer grad of 2015.
So glad our tax dollars helped those 3000 Norwegians watch porn. LOL. But in all seriousness, I would guess that means NOAA has a weather station in Svalbard?
My gigabit internet was fast enough for me to get here first though...
Lol
goteeeeemmmm
Me using a 2mbps connection (4G) for my internet life including gaming and not complaining about watching livestreams at 144p and still getting bufers
Snazzy Labs deez nuts? Got’em! 😅
Use a WeBoost cell booster to amplify your weak signal
133 ms around the earth would be for speed of light in a vacuum. Speed of light in glass fibre is 2/3 the speed
Fiber is hollow, the light is bouncing off the sides of the glass inside the fiber, not travelling through the glass at all. So it's traveling through air.
@@jordanwhitecar1982 wat? you need to get a refund on your education.
optical fibre relies on total internal reflection in the "glass" fibre due to the different refractive index.
And it's bouncing on the edges due to total internal reflection which adds to the distance.
@@PaulMansfield rofl I laughed at this harder than the original comment lol
@@bencharles4459 That's a good point.
When your *NVME sustained write speed* is slower than your internet...
That's why they make NVMe cards like the Aorus Gen 4 AIC so you can split 16 PCIe lanes into 4 4x lanes and RAID the NVMe drives for theoretically 28GB/s R/W
@@kaldogorath Funny... I actually seriously considered doing this myself but then I managed to convince myself not to. I mean how fast do I really need Overwatch to load. LOL
My hard drive is faster than my internet
@@CrimsonRegalia I do not think going for really high end nvme ssd makes your game load noticeably faster. Heck even on a sata ssd its fast to the point you don't even know if you're on nvme or ssd.
@@XxXnonameAsDXxX It's not about whether or not you can notice the difference. It's about who can insta-lock their favorite hero at the start of a match even if it is just 1 or 2 seconds... LOL (I never said I had a practical reason)
Do you know you can change the speedtest settings to just display MB/s instead of Mbit/s? That way you don’t have to do the conversion
............of course I knew that-i am not an amateur........
You can also change the scale. It is ridiculous when youtube videos of 5G mmwave gigabit have a scale that max's at 100 Mbit/s.
But Mbit/s is better to flex on others
@@snazzy /winkwink
I usually mentally divide a megabit/second speed by ten to allow for packet overhead (headers, checksums etc) to give me a more realistic megabyte/second rate.
Also, telecomms is weird, sometimes the speed is not mibibytes/second as in 1024 x 1024, but it can be 1000x1024 or 1000x1000 depending on the underlying clocks driving the actual signalling on the line.
"Negotiate with your ISP"
*Laughs in xfinity*
Xfinity has retention departments! Threaten to cancel and you'll be surprised what deals they can magically whip up.
I re-negotiated with xfinity about 5 months ago, getting way more performance and saving $50/mo
@@snazzy I managed to get my triple play package with 400 down to be under $200 a month (my dad still "needs" a landline)
Comcast laughed, knowing they signed an exclusivity agreement and I can only choose them or AT&T and also knowing AT&Ts prices. Jerks.
Thinking about starting up my own ISP off 5G cellular service.
Cable companies won't be laughing long.. StarLink Public Beta is about to launch. After years of abusing us, cable companies are soon about to be throwing themselves on the grounds kicking and screaming begging for government handouts.. Like the exclusive contracts and rights to control entire cities wasn't enough..
And here I am using a router that only has 10/100 ethernet to run my minecraft server...
didnt expect to see u here
Did you clean it with eucalyptus oil? It would give at least 10% speed increase :)
1Gbps for home router/needs I think should be the standard nowadays.
Gameservers don't need a lot of throughput
@@laurinneff4304 Wrong. Heavily modded minecraft servers can take an average of 3Mbit/s at only 4 active players, bursting up to 40Mbit/s at certain locations/loading chunks. Vanilla servers takes about less. 4 Mbit/s for about 8 active players. Bursting up to 30Mbit/s on heavy loads. Having servers with lots of concurrent players present bandwidth problems. Loading chunks fast enough can result into an internet DDoS if your port speed is that low.
when you have gigabit internet and Psivewri doesn’t 👁👄👁
To be precise:
Svalbard is not only home to 3000 people, but also to the world seed vault, where samples of nearly every fruit, vegetable, etc are stored, to keep humanity able to grow food in case of a Desaster. So this small Island is ptettty important to be connected
Why is it important to be connected? For security purposes generally you want to be disconnected.
@@kaldogorath you need some Form of working Connection, to get informations to and from the Island
"You could theoretically download warzone in 20 seconds" yeah except the Battlenet downloader would crash halfway through
Cant even Saturate my 100Mbit Connection through BattleNETs Server. May be different in the US, but here in Germany, especially when there was/is an Update for Warzone, u can go and wait for some time to get that thing Downloaded.
when you realize the speeds are just theoretical for the sake of flexing, you won't get that 10 Gigabit no ANYWHERE else except the speedtest server lol
Svalbard is not only home to 3000 people, it also houses the Arctic Web Archive, the offline backup of the internet. A fast connection seems like a great investment.
Honestly, at 4:26 I expected the dam to break after seeing the house getting wrecked...
Great minds think alike, sometimes.
Quin: 10gb ethernet is slow af!
Me: has 5mbps wifi
😂🤣😅 950 up 970down gigabit internet best
I from Ukraine
0.50 mbps
@@karen1.4.8.6 rookie numbers
This video demonstrates how important it's a good ISP. these days. Good interconnections with cloud providers and CDNs, great transit providers to the broader internet, and, most importantly, upgrading the core and the edge networks in order to sell faster speeds are, together, a key factor for selling very high speeds. It's quite easy to provide one gig, two gigs, or even more with the access gear we have today. XGS-PON is coming, and "10 gig" is the next big step. But, in practice, it's not 10 gigs if you can't use 20% of your bandwidth to download a game from Steam of from Xbox servers, nether can you retrieve a file from Google Drive at anything near the speeds you pay for. Of course, it's not all about the ISP, because the global internet operators need to work on this together on this issue. It's definitively possible and, frankly, quite easy. The challenge is, of course, money. And we are not good to go thought this by selling crazy-fast speeds for everyone. Fine, most people don't care about it. Paying $70 for 1-Gig and only receiving 200-Meg most of the time is miles better than paying $70 for a line capped at 200-Meg. However, if we want to take full advantage of theses speeds and not just experiencing a small improvement over slower ones, choosing a good ISP, with a fast backbone, vast interconnections running on fast interfaces (10G for less relevant traffic and 100G for relevant peers), and other points I sad is very necessary. Anyway, loved your video. The only RUclipsr I saw talking about the challenges of today's "ultra-fast" broadband.
Insightful comment
A lot has to do with internet routing. I do not live in a major metropolitan area and the nearest one is 300 miles away. I manage IT at my company and both offices have Fiber Internet and are only 70 miles apart. However, due to being two different ISP's and this not being a major metropolitan area, the data has to travel 1000+ miles round trip, putting the ping times for our site to site VPN at around 60ms. My house that is 7 miles from the main office has around a 40ms ping time due to a 600+ mile round trip. The "city" is a beach community and only has two data routes (regardless of ISP) and that is either east or west as there is nothing to our north. When Hurricane Michael took out Panama City Beach, it also took our all fiber optic lines to our east, leaving only the ones to our west. During the repairs, there were a couple fiber cuts to our west, cutting off our "city" entirely. AT&T had a fiber cut which took down all the cell phone towers in the city... all AT&T phones simply said "No Service" for 3-5 hours, same happened with AT&T U-Verse as well. The same thing happened with Mediacom... took out Cable Internet, VoIP, and Cable TV for nearly a week due to how severe the cut was. 100 Mbps Fiber for our primary office, located in the middle of downtown, is $450 a month on a 5 year contract. 100 Mbps Fiber for our remote office is $550 a month. The fastest internet AT&T offers at my house is 50 Mbps for $50 a month on a 2 year contract, but thankfully Cox offers Gigablast which is 940 Mbps down and 35 Mbps up for $69 a month with a 1 TB limit and $50 extra for unlimited data which is what I have. Thankfully I am able to get these speeds and since Steam has servers in Atlanta, where my ping time is around 25ms or so, I can nearly max out my connection downloading games from Steam. Needless to say, there is no data centers anywhere near us due to this being a small beach community and in the middle of Hurricane Alley.
Reading the title, my first thought was from Spaceballs: “NO NO LIGHTSPEED’S TOO SLOW! Lightspeed’s too slow?! WE NEED TO GO... LUDICROUS SPEED!”
gone full Plaid!
If you would like to see full details of a webpage load. Open up the developer tools / console of your web browser and navigate to the "Network" section. Load a web page and view the resulting waterfall chart. It will give you a detailed breakdown of the time it takes for establishing the initial connection, DNS lookup, SSL handshakes, content download etc etc. Will also tell you which items were found in your browsers cache (local cache) or downloaded from a CDN service (remote cache).
*Me sitting here with my 12 mbps download/1 mbps upload speeds*
same but cant beat 10 bucks a month no cap no contract
And when it's done its only 6 mbps for some reason
"Cat. 6a cables are expensive"
What?, they are the standard when building or upgrading a building.
Most people even go cat 7 or even cat 8 and just crimp on rj45 (cat.6)
Our house has cat 5 cables and we have gigabit internet, never seen any slow downs or packet errors.
Yeah I was in a construction site some time agk and talked to the electrician guys there. I was really surprised that they wired cat6, but it's super great.
Cat 6 is standard NOT 6a.
6a costs twice as much
@@XxXnonameAsDXxX Why? It costs basically the same as 5e.
Now what would surprise me is if they punched them as Ethernet B and not A
@@lilkittygirl At a local shop cat 6 costs 0,78€/m, cat 6a costs 0,72€/m and cat 7 is 0,98€/m (currently on sale cheaper than cat 6). (All prices at 100m)
Online they are normally all cheaper but whith similar margins between each other.
And yes cat 6a is the standart and nobody really buys or should buy cat 6.
13:39 Can I make a suggestion? It's not always better to change DNS servers, you should benchmark them to get a baseline. You can use tools like namebench or GRCs DNS Benchmark to do exactly that :D
You also have to consider the fact that DNS is very important for CDN delivery and load balancing/geolocation, if the DNS servers you are using don't support ECS you might get contents from the "wrong" (far away/more congested/not customized by your ISP) location
6:32 what’s happening there?
10 Gbps is too slow? hold my 10/2 Mbps network bandwidth
I’m from Norway. It was cool to see that you used a clip from the show «Ikke gjør dette hjemme» by NRK. Cool to see people use stuff made in Norway. Puts us on the map a little bit more. Keep up the good work, Quinn!☺️
I have Google Fiber and I've begun to notice what servers are slower than others- I don't even know if I'd move to the 2Gbps service when it comes out.
I've installed quite a few circuits for businesses and it's only the IT guys who complain and want faster speeds. I've found with a burstable 100 megabit/sec circuit the servers you connect to often rate-limit you down anyway.
I have FIOS gigabit, and what I found to be the biggest issue is just latency. DNS is one place, the second and perhaps more important is just having the right router that shapes traffic well. Gigabit can feel like 50 Mbps if you have buffer bloat. Why, well that DNS request and other requests get held up in a buffer causing pages and actions to appear to be delayed, well and they are. Fix the bloat and it's amazing how fast even a slower connection can feel. Knowing this is one thing, making sure you ensure each setup is working as good as it can be is another. 10Gb, well shouldn't have any buffer issues.
You're not a network guy... ;-) You're info is a little off, but I still enjoyed it. The biggest thing you misunderstood is that those "traceroutes" aka. hops are not necessarily real in today's world. When you see 10 hops, their could be a dozen more behind the scenes due to technologies like PPPoE, MPLS, etc that can make those hops invisible.
@@ok-us6hv Riiiiiiiiggghhhttt......
@@TheGeekPub hey... sorry if my comment was rude. im just stupid lol, but u earned a subscriber
What even is bgp
Back in 2000 my trusty old Pentium 200MHz Computer was overwhelmed by a brand new DSL connection featuring 768kbit/s. :D
Set your dns to googles dns server. It will direct your upload to a local server instead of the standard upload distribution server. Make sure to flush dns cache and local cookies before testing the upload.
A few points. I have only once come across a 10 Gb connection. It was for a major bank's data centre. Canadian banks tend to be much larger than American banks. By comparison, back in the early 90s, I was working on a job for another major bank. They had one data centre in Toronto and another in a different city. This project was to provide 4 DS3 (45 Mb each) connections between the two sites, with two coming from my company and two from the phone company. That was a blazing 180 Mb/s between two bank data centres! On the other hand, when I first started working in telecom, some of the equipment I worked on ran at all of 45.4 bit/sec!
Also, with my ISP, I'm paying for 500/20 Mb. However, according to speedtest I get around 940/31! So, no complaints there. And just this morning, I decided to check a 5G C band (3.5 GHz) cell connection and was getting around 436/78 with my Pixel 6 phone.
Forgot to mention, my ISP currently offers 2.5 Gb over fibre and plans to offer 8 Gb soon.
2:19 Can we just appreciate the elite acting involved here?
Tobias taught me
Snazzy Labs OH MY GOD, ITS A FIRE... sale
From Hawaii, I like to speed test to San Francisco to test my connection through the cables. I typically lose about 30-40 percent of my download speed when doing that.
Me: _Cries in 56kbps dial up_
@8:00 It also depends on whether the user's ISP peers with an Internet exchange point to actually benefit from Cloudflare's CDN.
_"I HATE my 10 Gigabit connection"_
*Me ironically actually trying to watch this at 144p with my 0.1 Mbps data!*
_cries_
4k best
😂🤣😅 950 up 970down gigabit internet best
@@bigmaxcc lol, u have that?
128K ADSL?
That exists? Are you sure you didn’t time skip from the 90s?
As an employee of an isp that offers high speed fiber internet I have to say this is the lords work you are doing
TCP overhead takes away from your overall upload speed. In addition providers along the path can rate-limit youtube very easily and RUclips rate limits uploads as well. Also, "pathping" is a better tester built into Windows.
I'm still blown away i finally have 30-60Mpbits/sec down and 20 up with T-Mobile, out in the middle of nowhere. Of course, it took a Mofi-4500 SIM 7 modem, a couple of antennas that cost $300 each and a fiberglass pole, POE injector/splitter, Netgear AX3000 router and 300ft of Cat6e cable to make it work,but hey, it's only $20/mo for "unlimited". Before that it was 1mbits/sec DSL that was always dropping out. No other options including satellite because i'm up against a mountain which obstructs my view.
Good legal torrents to try are linux distros, some of them are seeded by properly fast connections like universities and other subjects serving as mirrors
They are too small to get enough connections to serve you.
I miss the old speedtest site where you could select the server location manually.
The video was great, but that thumbnail was on another level!
I showed you my network switch pls respond
@Snazzy Labs where do Steam downloads top out at?
Might be a good idea to disable the remote config UI on your edgerouter if you're not going to blur more than that. :)
I live in South OKC, and according to Ookla, the nearest SpeedTest server is in Richardson, TX, hosted by AT&T. However, there are several SpeedTest servers in OKC, hosted by OneNet, Dobson Technologies, and Cox Communications. Also, we have AT&T U-verse V-DSL, which would probably explain why the AT&T Richardson server is pinning as being closer than any of the ones in OKC served by their competitors. We've had the same ISP since early 2003, starting with SBC Yahoo! Dial, then upgrading to SBC Yahoo! A-DSL in late 2003 (which would become AT&T Yahoo! A-DSL after SBC Communications, Inc. acquired AT&T Corp. in 2004 to become AT&T, Inc.), followed by an upgrade to AT&T U-verse V-DSL in 2013.
Also, Alphabet, Inc. has a Google data center in Mayes County, OK right near the northeast corner of the state.
Snazzy: « my 10 gigabit internet is too slow »
Me: *vibes on 60 mbps*
Edit: my school’s wifi is 0.95 mbps
Me on 10 megabit
Sams
Same
@@zaineoakley5555 Where I live, people who have 10 meg get it as government assistance internet or get it as a reduced price. I get the old 30 meg plan because I complained that the "1 speed for all plan" from Spectrum without getting fiber was too expensive.
*Cries at 48.45 mbps*
So its not your internet connection that is slow but the internet it self !
Spectrum is the worst here in So Cali. They keep raising my bill ever 3-4 months. Have called multiple times and they refuse to help. They just want to sign me up to a more expensive plan. Ugh
Spectrum has been really good to me in my experience. What exactly are the issues you were having? If I ever have an issue with spectrum it's almost alaays intermittent connection
Always
Just an FYI, and Not meant as a Gotcha. Something important about how fast you can upload to a place like Google Drive, RUclips, or anywhere else also depends on the Download speeds available of the servers hosting the service you are trying to access, and their upload speed when you are downloading something. The server could have a 10Gb connection to it as well, but limits are put in place per session so one user is not allowed to "Hog" the bandwidth. This is for security and user experience It prevents against simple attacks from hackers that may take place, and allows for more people to be able to access the features they want on the site as well.
This was a great explanation that is easy to understand.
Snazzy Labs: "My 10 gigabit internet is too slow..."
Me: Weird flex but ok.
A Ookla Speedtest server is not only selected by physical location. The Ookla system determines the best server by using a geo-IP system to find the physically closest servers, then your client pings those servers and uses the one with the lowest latency, making the selected server the closest server from a network perspective. So not necessarily the physically closest, but the quickest to respond.
Alternative title: How to flex on people.
Here in Egypt the internet is so expensive and they give a tiny amount of data cap, even after getting ftth in some places(not all of course) the fastest you can get is 200 mb/s but with 1024gb cap and the upload is not even close to half that for almost 70$.If you look it up in Egypt it's a monopoly.
I don't think caps will disappear from Egypt anytime soon.
How many bigmacs for that kind of bandwidth?
"This is what most non-fiber homes have"
Copper and that 40ms of lag!11!!
my old dsl connection:150ms to 500ms
your internet:5ms
Me:If the ISPs actually did something with that money related to fiber.
13:16 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I remember hearing somewhere that piracy is only illegal if you are publishing the content, like if you are uploading a movie online for a free download, but if you are just downloading that movie, you will be fine.
I pay for gigabit down / 35mbps upload... I am consistently bottlenecked at 5mbps upload. No idea why :(
As an internet tech support rep I literally spend 10 hours a day explaining this to people. It’s crazy how few people realize how the internet actually works. Don’t even get me started on wifi either...
That must be pure pain. Mad Respect for your Service Sir!
At 9:50, cloudflare also acts as a reverse proxy for sites so you will never know the actual ip address of the fiver server, it will always be cloudflare's ip. So even if cloudflare didn't cache the request, you will only see cloudflare's ip.
It's a good day when we can get 25Mbps down and 10Mbps up. :-(
Have you adjusted RWIN sizes for such a fast connection?
Your videos are not Snazzy enough to warrant such a Network.
Love the fact that you used a clip from "Ikke gjør dette hjemme" from from the norwegian NRK to demonstrate throughput. Good stuff, buddy!
Y’all are complaining about you 100-10000 mps internet while I’m lucky to get 30mps lol
Throughput and bandwdith also rings true for your broadband speed and what rate your router can up/download. Just because your router has gigabit ports does not mean it can upload or download at gigabit speeds. I remember some time ago I had to choose carefully my router as most would have a lower actual throughput than the actual broadband speed.
Cryin in 8 mbps up and 1 mbps down
PTSD from Omantel's ADSL internet 😖
Here in Jersey channel island, the telecoms company finished their rollout of fibre (ftth) to all 100k+ residents. During the pandemic they have given every single household 1Gbps symmetrical connection for free, as long as they are already paying for a standard service.
everyone gangsta saying first until they refresh the comments
I live in Toronto, Canada. I have the top tier of Rogers Internet. it's advertised at 1Gbit/s but can only get 300 mbit/s due to modem constraints (also have fastest modem available). Upload speed is attrocious at 15 mbit/s. There literally is nothing faster available in Canada. Who ever makes this kind of speed available in Canada should get a blank cheque.
*Weeps in 60MB Down, 6MB Up*
i weep too
Woohoo! Even I'm faster.
By like 15 Mbps down. Lol
*75↑ 10↓*
Thats pretty fast. 60MB/s=480Mbps, 6MB/s=48Mbps
he : my 10 gbps internet is too slow
me at watching this at 144p : yeahh video is not lagging
I feel you bro
First for the first time
Nice
30 seconds too late
As someone who does networking for a living, I get this complaint about network speed all the time. Most websites don't have more than a gigabit connection ( and they're not just sending data to you, so that has to be split between everyone accessing their site ), some only have 100 megabit ( still more common than one would think in this day and age ). Not to mention every stop along the way from your computer to their server. You may get routed over a slow pipe which probably won't effect your bandwidth much since even a slow pipe is still probably faster than your home connection, but depending on how congested it is, it may seriously effect your latency. The server may be in a remote place, or in a place where natural disasters ( such as hurricanes, or massive fires ) are effecting the ability of the local networking infrastructure to provide as much throughput as might be normally available if large portions of their network weren't down as a result. And that still doesn't take into account how much of your traffic is going over high speed low latency fiber, and how much is going over more traditional copper. Not to mention latency introduced when switching between the two mediums in addition to the normal latency from each additional hop. It gets really crazy, and it's really a miracle that the internet even works at all at times.
This was actually a GOOD networking explainatory video. A lot of tech youtubers don't really understand half of this.
Winner of the most 1st world problem YT title of 2020
And I am stuck with the 50/5Mbit connection that my rental company provides. Which is especially great to mirror all my backups to an offsite server.
You being a RUclipsr and recommending ad blockers for faster Internet says a lot about how much you care for your audience and the right info!
Someone who is halfway around the world. *Cries in Australian*
When one of your handful of highly respected RUclipsrs is not only in your same metropolitan area, but also on your same fiber ISP. Well done sir, well done!
At home I switch from Comcast 200Mb to 1Gb plan and saved money. Basically over the years my Comcast service had switch to more expensive a la cart pricing. All basically switch back to a plan and dropped some premium cable channels I rarely watched. I now get 1.4 Gb download.
All consumer firewalls top out at 1Gb, so you will only see 950 Mb speedtests. I had to install a pfsense firewall with dual 10 Gb NICS. The cable modem is attached to the WAN port at 2.5Gb. The LAN port is attached at 10Gb. The best I have seen in consumer is 2.5Gb WAN and 1GB LAN.
The NICS are actually what they call Multi-Gigabit NICS, they operrate at 10Gb, 5Gb, 2.5Gb, and 1Gb. The old 10 Gb NICS only operated at 10Gb and 1Gb. 10Gb NICS are expensive, so a lot of equipment is opting for cheaper 2.5Gb NICS. The secret wording is Multi-Gigabit. It took me awhile before I realized that.
Can't wait for that video about the rewiring your house to get better internet 😂
That lathe and plaster is going to be fun.
and i still have 2mbits per second
There is a bit of a disconnect with this topic: At multi-gigbit speeds you might be limited to a small fraction for any single data connection, but likely can make use of multiple connections. For instance what if 1 person was uploading a youtube video, while another person was download a game, and another streaming via twitch or some other platform. Usually 10 Gbit is intended for many users sharing the same data pipe at the same time.
I got 1Gpbs filber here at home, I improved my network performance by:
1) Using a mikrotik router
2) changing all access points to tp-link ax APs
3) changing my ISP provided GPON ONT to a better quality model
That's the first video I see of yours and you impressed me. Great job!
@1:24 - Windows tip: if you click the menu lines in the top left of the built-in calculator you can do pretty much any conversion you want right in the app, including data conversions; it even supports date calculation of either difference between dates or figuring out dates in the future/past by adding/subtracting days, weeks, or months.
I know it's hard to imagine Windows having good built in features, but hey, stranger things have happened outside of Mac land ;)
Do ISPs use NAT for gigbit fiber or do I get a public IP?
"hey what's your ping?"
"no."
Question. That was the cost to also deploy, drench, vessels, and workers? For that cable connecting that island? Or just the manufacturing
Would love to have this “problem”
What grinds my gear the most is people that have a fiber connection calling their service-provided hardware modem, a modem, converts data from a digital format into a format suitable for an analog transmission medium such as telephone or radio.
Most often it's just a darn switch with VLAN support.
Why is there quantization
error artifact in the audio
of this video?
At my home I threatened cancelling my 15mb/s (1,5mb/s download) internet plan and the retention said: Well, if you need better speeds, you can look elsewhere for it. We don’t have the infrastructure for more than 15mg/s for your home at the moment. We are so sorry to see you go, but there is nothing we can do about it. 🥺😐
verizon?
@@MetallicDZN Brazil (Oi Velox)
here in Tucson, AZ you tell Cox you will switch to the one other provider and they literally say "good luck".
Great video, Quinn! I love how you have an obsession to get the most out of everything! Like a Mac computers, audio, internet...
just be glad you have fast internet, goddamn, students like me struggle uploading assignments online...
Don't forget that the application server at the other end must have the resources available to handle your 10 Gbps of throughput. Very few are provisioned that way, because it is extremely costly at scale and unnecessary for most application requirements.
I'm literally watching this on 1 bar of 3g data haha since my power went out and my reception is trash
It also looks like you are using the Speedtest app and using a browser to run the transfer (naturally). Try running your speedtest from the browser and see what slowdowns it introduces.
10 Gbe has been affordable for a person at home for the last 5+ years. That is if you are willing to buy used enterprise hardware. About 8-9 years ago I bought 8 X 10 Gbe SFP+ single port cards and 5 X 10Gbe Dual Port SFP+ cards and ran fiber or copper SFP+ cables through my house. I used my HP server running ESXi as the switch to connect traffic to a computer running clear OS as a dedicated web appliance. I think all together I paid in the neighborhood of $500 for the cables and the cards not counting the server that I already had. That to me doesn't seem all that bad considering that some people spend $200+ on crap consumer wifi routers for their house that doesn't hold a candle to 4yo enterprise and even used DIY solutions.
With that speed, the two of them can browse those explicit websites very quickly.