China's Special Drone Carriers Are Not What They Seem
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- Naval analyst HI Sutton identified a new drone aircraft carrier in China. What does it do? How significant is it as a naval asset?
Want to support the channel? - / eurasianavalinsight
www.buymeacoff...
Tags: Chinese Navy, PLA Navy, naval, defence, military, modern warship, catamaran, unmanned aerial vehicles, unmanned combat aerial vehicle, aircraft carriers, H2528
My theory is that "drone carrier" is a technological demonstrator to test drone operations, specifically drone launching and recovery, not an actual operational drone carrier. As such, it doesn't need a large hanger deck, which would be required for actual combat operations.
With regards to launching and recovering, a consideration would be the catamaran speed. Sailing high speed into the wind may faciliate drone launching and recover depending on their stall speeds on short runways.
For all intent or Purpose, it might not operating UCAV as traditional carrier "per se"
rather than carry UAV like Reaper or byakathar
It carry Suicide Drone like Shahed or Loitering munitions like "naval" lancets
Amphibious support not Sea Control - role
from Dimension, it could easily carry and launch 100 shahed. stored in container like racks bellow deck
It's a testbed
Sounds like we need to test our dragon swarm munitions
No need for a deck to launch a suicide drone, though,
Turkey already has their drone carrier ready to start sea trials if I recall last year. Their carrier was supposed to host F-35B's but US refused to sell them to Turkey so it will only carry helicopters and drones, supposedly the world's first fighter aircraft drones.
I don't think the wingspan issue is that severe. If it veers off course, it's not like the wings will get sheared off (unless it literally hits the island). If the tips of the wings go past the runway boundaries, nothing will happen. It's not like there's anything there to hit (besides the island).
I suspect that the reduced size of this drone carrier is to make it more expendable. Modern naval warfare favors the offense. It's always easier to hit a ship with a missile than to hit a missile with a missile. So making ships as small as possible while fulfilling the basic requirements is the way to go. Ships of this size, 100 meters long, can be manufactured very quickly in batches, like frigates. And since drones don't require trained pilots, staffing them will be much less of an issue.
Perhaps armed drones with full load of fuel can be an issue.
It is not in fact automatically easier to hit a ship with a missile than a missile with one.
Missiles contain very little to often no electronic counter measures.
Nuclear aircraft carrier battle groups contain all of them in existence.
The fact is you cannot target an aircraft carrier due to EW from the distances needed.
GPS does not work within a carrier EW bubble.
live video feed does not work.
Radar would work given you close in but of course before you reach the carrier there exist combat air patrols and AWACS that will see you on approach.
But then again you don't have GPS or video so your going to need to use AI pilots for the drones plus interial guidance sensors like gyros and radio distance finder to determine distance to ground/sea and if you want to maintain swarming with the other drones you will need laser uplinks to keep them all in the loop and they will need to be made out of stealthy components except if you use naturally low visibility stuff like let's just say cardboard that wouldn't survive a week at sea but even if you use let's go plastics those will make it much easier for existing anti drone weapons because we already have the ability to target and fry drones electronics quite easily. Unshielded they'd be useless so now you need metal but that means you need to shape it to stealth and Jesus this is now getting heavy we'll need bigger wings and fuel and a larger motor and oh yay it's now literally more expensive than the missile that intercepts it.
1500 dollar drones make complete sense for reaching out a few miles.
Across the 500 miles you'd need to cross of open ocean to reach a carrier battle group, it's pointless.
@@sparkzbarca thats why i always say tactical nukes are the best counter to carrier fleets
I think you underestimate how much more susceptible to wind & waves
the combination of small aircraft and small ship would be.
China has 200 X [two hundred times, not percent] the ship-building capacity if the US. They can have a fleet of 1000 of these in 2 years
anyone who is serious to consider how various equipments will impact the direction of war, will be far more concerned about how fast those equipments can be manufactured every year, instead of certain amout of equipment one country has at a given time. In such sense, necessary production capability, ability to expand the infrastructure, skilled workers, manufacturing lead time, maintenance lag time etc are crucial factors to evaluate. Stalin was negotiating with Roosevelt and Churchill on post war arrangements while German troops were still outside Moscow. The confidence came fromt the fact that both Soviet and US annual production of war aircrafts exceeded 2000 while Germany made far below 2000s every year and shrinking. As a chinese I hope the hot headed warmongers in some western countris do please take the above into consideration, and not to incite conflicts similar to Ukrain in Asia. Asian cultures are slow in decision making process, but once direction is set, they will not easily change the course either and ask for maximum sacrifice from its people and fight with lasting endurance. It is perfectly acceptable if you do not like sertain country or people, its your democratic right as a citizen of the planet, but miscalculation caused by simplification and distortion due to propaganda will have dire concequence on common people, and it is the common people who will suffer most. I beg the most learned, intetellectural and patriotic readers of the channerl to review the Korean war chapter and use the brilliant US soilders wisely.
I don't think there is a risk of US attacking China. We've seen in Ukraine that there is a great deal of hesitancy and caution about even having the appearance of supporting the direct attack of Russia, even by proxy. US would saber rattle and sanction and raise a fit because it's only the USA that can attack and invade other nations - but toe to toe would most likely spell the destruction of the planet.
Perhaps China figured out any amphibious landing needs protection from a kamikaze drone swarm. The high speed of the catamaran hull would help to position itself where its hundreds of anti-drone drones swarming everywhere within 10 km provides protection. Right now drone swarms are quickly getting bigger. They are like the introduction of tanks during WW1 (a few of them were used with lessons learned, then a large number were used together in one battle with much improved combined tactics for overwhelming success).
Yeah, now lets see how well swarms handle active denial jamming systems, and overwhelming overloads of energy surging through them frying them. Wonder how well they will fly after that?
@@iNSOMNISTREAMNah...it's impossible to jam everywhere all at once. Take down a thousand and another thousand will hit their target no matter what, not to mention preemptive missile strikes on key locations from land air and sea.
@@iNSOMNISTREAM It already show off by US navy ships and Hauthi drones. US ships just run away 😭
@@mydad156 Uhh yeah sure buddy. If the US wanted they could have levelled Iran back to the stone age along with their Houthis lackey.
Only reason they won't do so is because the top administration isn't filled with people like Bush anymore where they can just nilly willy invade another country and come up with a bogus reason for it.
@@iNSOMNISTREAM"JamMer This High EnErgy tHat"
A 300 year old Tech that's standard on Military Drones called Faradays Cage be like 👁👄👁
Also Russian EW Jammer sure are working well against Ukrainian FPV drones. And EW are probably the only admittedly good hardware the Russians have.
Goofy goober ass lol.
wow, I had to stop once the voice said the US Navy can't do normal launch and recovery simultaneously 'like China'... either they don't know the words for 'normal flight ops' or don't know US Navy Carrier doctrine. US Carriers have 4 catapults, and an angled deck to allow recoveries while we launch. We launch and recover AS NORMAL FLIGHT OPS. As for a 'dedicated drone ship'? Yeah, one task design ships only work for some tasks like salvage, oiler, ammo ships.... Considering the size of that ship, it doesn't look safe in blue waters.... and I'm positive a US Navy Carrier can carry a lot more drones than that thing could.
ture bro
Yea, he's a neo imperialist CCP affiliate
Perhaps a small landing platform will serve as a transit/refueling pad for helicopters between the mainland and Taiwan or islands in S China Sea. Also there will be a need to launch smaller sized drone swarms. Such a large deck could simultaneously launch hundreds of militarized drones (think in terms of DJI’s finest quad copters but 1 meter propeller blades & carrying 10 times the weight). Or perhaps the small decks will allow continuous presence of helicopter/quadcopter within 100 km. The catamaran hull should be stable in rough seas and allow decent speed in littoral waters surrounding Taiwan and in South China Sea.
A drone carrier will be smaller than a jet fighter with pilot.
A drone will be smaller but can carry a payload as jetfighter.
such a large deck is also capable of launching VTOL aircraft as well
Turkish TCG Anadolu has already started trials. It is the worlds first drone carrier.
You have no idea on the topic. Chinese one has electromagnetic catapult systems.
@@mingouczjcz3800 So? It is still not the worlds first drone carrier
Not sure why this is considered revolutionary? The U.S. was building both light carriers and escort carriers since WWII. All the while building up the Essex class carriers at the same time. I'm sure the U.S. has already looked into a carrier built specifically for drones. Something that could bolster the number of flight decks to work along with the 11 full size carriers.
"U.S. has already looked into a carrier built specifically for drones". and decided there is not enough profit for the shipyards.
You are assuming take off and landings follow a centerline. If the landing/takeoff aircraft centerline is biased away from the island, larger wingspan drones are possible.
Sometimes people love to think China builds secret weapon
We all know China isn't obligated to do a full English introduction just for them...
The juxtaposition of "secret hidden project" and being built in the open near other projects also seems a bit strange.
No they just make a bunch of cg videos of things that were swiped from us that werent utilized because theyre impractical or only looked good on paper.
@@iNSOMNISTREAMnot CG. Maybe look again with better glasses. Nothing you said makes any sense.
@@user-mhgu6om9mj2t i didnt say this specific one was cg. Most are though however. A lot of concept stuff that looks good on paper, but not practical in use. Read again with better glasses. Over the years its exactly what has happened time and time again. Its what happens when you let a two faced mentality populous work alongside you trying to make relations better. They just end up taking all the work youve done, and stab you in the back with it due to something they cant get over and hold grudges over rather than trying to move forward. Its definitely showing today more than ever peace was never chinas goal, it was to take over as much it could. People can call b.s. on that all they want but its constantly trying to grab new land to expand its borders. Makes trade deals it know the ones its making deals with have no possible way to pay them back just for the purpose of gaining control over them instead of trying to actually help anything beside itself. Usa of course make deals that were benificial to it but at the same time helped others where we could and even some that didnt benifit us. China hasnt done anything but try to trap anyone and everyone it can into owing it so it has diplomatic power and is on a set course of if they cant have it then noone can, and are showing by their researches and zero limits, especially ones that are very taboo for anyone with a brain not good areas to mess with like bio weapons, genetic and bioengineering, chemical warfare, nuclear, and anything amd everything. Unlike the usa who stopped developing new nuclear weapons on a good gesture to set level to at least start moving away from wars with such destructive weapons in a path for peace between nations. Most of the world was doing pretty well as far as how well globalisation was working. Yeah conflicts here and there but for the population of earth, not really that bad at all when compared to history.
Back to the point though, most things china shows off are either not even operational, parked somewhere and not in use, or in concept form in a animation showing what has been drawn up, which a lot of the time is something stolen from others. China may not consider it stealing, but the majority of the world does. China acts like it wants to move forward and do good for the world but everyday it keeps inching everyone closer to the next world war with its immature antics it tries to act like is nothing but is hostility. Like come on a weather satellite it claims, then immediately after it comes online like any spoiled kid with no self control runs and shows everyone it lied by showing a picture of the usa carriers in a dock, great job admiting your word means nothing and cant be trusted as it showed exactly what it was really for, spy satellite, but sad thing is, we already expected theres spy sats out there so if china just got theirs out there then its further behind than what could be expected. A population of 1.4b vs a population of little under 400m, and a history of 5000 years, china should be much more advanced long ago, not playing catch up and then act as condescending as it does.
One thing i do find funny though, it keeps trying to buy land in the usa thinking it becomes chinas, but our land doesnt work that way. Just like in china, foreignors cant buy land here for keeps. When the united states became the united states, an agreement was made that once each state was locked in to being part of the united, they couldnt receed or change ownership. That means any trade of land that would transfer the land over to another nation is not allowed as it would breach that original agreement. So its basically just a rental agreement at best.
@@iNSOMNISTREAM didnt know people still believed in "america is the good guy" lmao... debt trapping is bs that was debunked years ago by your own media and the "Usa of course make deals that were benificial to it but at the same time helped others where we could and even some that didnt benifit us." part is the most bs i have ever seen
starting to think ur one of those people that pretend to be american to make americans look stupid
The design is good looking.
STOL ucavs like the Mojave would make sense from this time of platform. The significant endurance of uavs would also be a reason the flight deck isn't designed for simultaneously launch and recovery ops as the loitering time wouldn't require a constant change of in air aircraft.
I love small carriers!!!
Perhaps China will perfect precision autonomous drone landings using quick reaction large flaps and an additional rudder on top of the fuselage at the front. To avoid the Island, drones don’t have to land in the middle of the runway; their landing gear could touch down 2 or 3 meters from the deck edge with one wing over the deck and the other wing sticking out past the deck.
The air pressure differences/ground effect has me thinking that if they try to land half on half off they will barrel roll into the ocean since
@@mikeymike9926 that’s why wing flaps will lift harder on the overhang side, well within the control flight envelope. The rudder on top of the fuselage at the front provides the ability to move the nose sideways without having to use the tail rudder to move the tail in the opposite sideways direction which would put the tail at risk.
if the Drone has a taill hook maybe it can back land to Carrier
The issues with catamarans is that they can't go into the deep ocean. Meaning that the Chinese drone carrier is best used from brown water or green water operations (i.e. rivers or near the shore). It depends on the size of the drones you want to launch, but I think a dedicated drone carrier isn't the best idea. Currently, the US Navy is working on integrating deone operations alongside manned aircraft. This means that the drones are launched from regular aircraft carriers alongside Navy fighter jets. This seems far more efficient imo, than a dedicated drone carrier.
i believe drone carriers will bring back in fashion rocket assisted take ofs
Whatever it is, it looks very interesting. Perhaps intended to at least evaluate STOL drone systems as you mention, or perhaps for some other purpose entirely? We will probably know soon enough, and it is FAR cheaper to build (in bulk) that larger carriers.
14 seconds ago is crazy
Haha very impressive
You’re right, they’re brand new mobile coral reefs ready for deployment into the sea
เราว่าสร้างเรือลำเล็กๆให้มีจำนวนมากๆ.ที่มีความเร็วสูงเหมือน(จรวด)ใด้ก็จะดี.ควบคุมด้วย(เอใอ)
ใว้ทำ(กามิกาเซ่)
Thank you for this, it is most likely a ship for training exercises although it might not even carry any drones. Maybe a target for some radar systems probably simulating how such systems can detect a ship with a flat profile from above. Could be for China's so-called carrier-killer missiles. It could even just be for the training of carrier sailing. PLAN still does not have that robust of an experience with carriers.
It reminds me of USS Wolverine. Perhaps a training or proof of concept vessel
It's highly likely, this mini drone carrier, is, like the 001 Liaoning carrier, a full scale test bed which can be used frontline. I would expect the full production of say 20 of these mini drone carriers after this test bed has completed full trials
Not the worlds first drone carrier; I believe Turkey has already built one
PLA is interesting in military
@@hamstermomocoCharity, yeah...they're involved with plenty of disaster and humanitarian missions too
They’re here to liberate you
Watching this before work
Beautiful champ
Thanks man!
🧐新型的武库舰！搭载的武器只不过是各种无人机，要知道新型j20可以在保持隐形的情况下指挥至少4架无人机僚机。
Am getting USS Wolverine vibes small ship no hanger this is probably a UAV/UCAV Helicopter training ship something that UAV operators and helo crews can train on without having to use an actual aircraft carrier or LHA like Wolverine this ship is likely as big as it needs and may have no emergency wartime role outside of wartime training for the Z-20 and Z-10 and Z-21 and UAV's on a actual LHA or CV
PLA❤
☝️🙄 must be ccp
@user-xe5qt7bc6w wumao,
ccp - Crappy chinese people
@user-xe5qt7bc6w wumao,
ccp - Crappy chinese people
@user-xe5qt7bc6w wumao
@user-xe5qt7bc6w ccp - Crappy chinese people
For real, that looks more like a naval drone survey platform...
I think it's more of a test bed, it has no sensors and no elevators
@@elmanco6885 Test bed shall have those thing equipped (to trace drone in test fly), this feels more of a survey platform for smaller fixed wing drone, and it does not need to venture far from coastline... Maybe for close shore survey?
"one way drone operation" ME THINKS this is spot on.
Unlike planes, drones are super light. They don’t need long runways.
Everything can do short take-off as long as your aircraft have a lot uplift force
Hence some Drone still need to shoot with capacult
Before they can finish that project Thier leader Winnie the Pooh will die due to old age
China work very fast..
The first nation to understand how the wars of the future would be fought and to draw practical conclusions from this.
you are talking about turkey not china right?
Basically, China ISN'T hiding them to keep them "secret"
They just make them and NOT overhype them with a special promotional video like most american weapons these days.
Right, we chinese develop military is not aim to intimidate and threat someone, it is a actually a 'defence' force. We do not attempting show this to the country who is not intent to invade China.
New type of warfare!
True, having a big carrier will become a huge liability and target. Simple to take out by lots (in the thousands) of incoming drones.
Cpp tofu shiip is joek. An dheir droon wiil foll fram skai laik flaiis 🤣. Amerikkan 7th fleet caan easii defeet cpp
@@jaihindersingh just fix the damn toilet indiot
US already have drone carriers. China PLAN has nothing.
@@bertiesworld ah yes just fu*king figures how you launch whole damn drone in first place
And why Ukrainians and Russian still do WWI fight instead of spam sh*t load of missiles to eachother
This is the future.
Planes ready to launch at the push of a button 24/7.
8 years before pearl harbor the navy was laughing at the thought of a ship carrying airplanes
Thanks to these English language "teachers" in China, now the west knows. 👍👏👏👏🤣🤣🤣
Imagine being one of the flight crew on a drone carrier,
It’s the carrier from Carrier Commander 2!
😂😂 fun game
china being wise about being modern
That’s to carry all the people swept downstream when the dam breaks.
Now this is where the investments should be! smaller carriers especially drone carriers! and LHDs and not on Standard Carriers or Super Carriers! The Fujian better be the last of those expensive behemoths; oh and China better not go the nuclear powered ship path, the battles will be held near China, those things sinking would be an environmental disaster!
drone carriers are not an adequate replacement for larger fleet/super carriers, mainly to carry aircraft too large and heavy for these small drone carriers. Keep in mind that small drones have much more limited range, speed, and payload than larger aircraft do, and there are no drones out there capable of replacing AWAC aircraft, which are a vital component in any air force and naval air arm.
Where is the link to HI Sutton's article?
Get excited for the latest tofu-dreg carrier! 10 naval commanders get a medal every time it makes it from shore to shore
Make it longer for drone reaper don't call qm9 bounty hunters call then communications tower
Wild idea, but redoing I-400 using drones
Innovation in design in real time!
Ironically I think the best answer to drones is old school flak guns ala WWII, with todays tracking those slow moving drones would be a turkey shoot.
mostly not a bettle ship, for maritime drone, a much bigger one will be favorable, even GZ11 is not big enough. small drone fly slower and lower which means higher risk of being intercepted, carries little anti ship missile even much smaller than yj83 which means no harm to 8000ton destroyers,
a mig 21 sized drone with a internal bombing bay will be more favorable, if it are stealthy and can carry at least a yj62 will be better, this kind of thing requires at least the size of 076, wing-loong 2 can do nothing on sea, you can not expect sink an enermy destroyer with agm114 hellfire, it can fly for 12 hours -- before meet enermy SM2, that thing will shoot down wingloong 2 in 180 seconds
It would be far easier by arming the ship with YJ-62s or heavier missiles and just use simpler and lighter drones to seek targets.
@@tvgerbil1984 sensors are still heavy in weight and huge in size
an advanced aesa radar with range of more than hundreds kilometers beyond range of American carrier group optical can easily affected by bad weather
at least a wz8 or GZ11 or MQ58 sized drone can actually carry this kind of thing, these drones are not small at all
you may think about numbers may make up for this but how many smaller drones can warship actually carries, that is the problem
how many drones can finally survive and guide anti ship missiles is actually counts
when thinking of a world war, i always over estimate enermy and under estimate PLA navy, i can not afford a single failure, i think admirals of peoples navy think so
Turkiye has a similar vessel! In serviced in 2023.
Wow! Now I got something else to build in 1:72 :(
To me it seems it will only operate patrol drones and not UCAVs.
Plausible interpretation of Imagery Intelligence and - unlike Sutton - some _structural context_ of the Chinese ship building industry.
No well-deck = no _combat_ drone carrier, but likely a _target_ drone platform as indicated by the yard's expertise...
这是一艘专用靶船
So many know it all’s that know nothing more than what someone else told them. This comment section is full of military strategists and financial advisors.
So basically it's a float with a motor
Another Dreadnaught moment IMO.
Mass production drone carrier
FURUNOのレーダーセンサーだ。
I think H.I.Sutton has a more credible track record than this character. His opinion seems to be based on existing ships and operating procedures.
HIS is less biased.
I love the way you say catamaran
Actually the new toys of China's navy that you are saw just like a tip of iceberg,a lot of more secrets toys they're hidden in the part of the iceberg that down under sea level,we need know
Apparently nobody listened to video and did any real research.
In reality, the Chinese ship is in NO WAY capable of deploying a "swarm" of explosive drones. That's not the purpose. The purpose is to carry maybe up to two dozen full size drones and support helicopters in order to counter beach landings.
Essentially it's a smaller, quicker aircraft carrier that can launch light aircraft in order to defend against marine assault forces.
If any military wanted to just launch a swarm of small drones then they could do that from virtually any warship. Dedicating an entire ship to swarm drones is nonsense. They are creating individual missiles that can break open into hundreds of explosive target-seeking drones. A couple pods that launch those will eventually be on every ship.
Shahid Mahdavi and Shahid Bagheri are Iran's first drone carriers. Apparently these are very large ships which carry drones and little else. The iranians probably believe these are not nonsense and suit their style of asymmetric warfare.
cat-a-ma-ran. practice it.
什么航母？就是一艘渔船而已。看着宽大的甲板其实是视觉的关系，那个就是用来现场切割捕捞到的大型鱼获。
Special drone carrier? More like a mock-up toy!
I see China has gone back to the ww2 japanese carrier philosophy: specialize for one thing and hope the next carrier has something to pick up the slack (it won’t).
^ Lol armchair weebn33t analysis ^
Maybe the ship will launch bomb-laden kamikaze drones which are not supposed to return!
China will build an Arsenal Bird one day.
Paper tiger😂😂😂
这是一个电子信号模拟靶船。
shinajin-kuso
So Stupid, World's First Dedicated Drone Carrier... Ha... What a Crock, Turkey already has and is operating one... Shows how little this Channel Knows, this Channel and or Chinese Propaganda!
无人机航母可以围绕美国24小时巡航，这就是自由航行。
Suicide drones? 😮 thought of that
no1 remembers trump n musk saying if we want drone we can make drones
someone in the CCP has been playing carrier command 2 lol
it's just a ferry ship😅
Please show these in Britain and France.
cheap assault ship?
Star Wars: The Clone Wars? Nah
World Wars: The Drone Wars, Yes
im a fan just cuz its cute
Wow taking shots at an industry bigwig like HI Sutton but can’t pronounce catamaran
Locust drone-swarming techology; e g. 10,000 drones, big, medium and small swarming a fleet group backed by 3,000 hypersonic missiles. The Houthis used only 100 drones and no missile but the US warships started running away. 😂😂😂😂
@@BloodySnow8 You must have overwhelming force to ensure every ship in a fleet must be sunk. Underwater drone technology and deep sea research which the Chinese have been doing for decades now will pose a nightmare to enemy submarines in the Western Pacific. With the satellites monitoring the entire region, China must ensure that those who come for war and including the 313 military bases, will never have a chance to have the next mess. This is the reality and China must not back away from; it's either them or us.
@@BloodySnow8mid range will do
You have no idea what those words even mean do you?
10,000 drones would be useless to engage a carrier battle group and 3,000 hypersonic missiles would cost something on the order of 100 billion Dollars.
Which makes it about as expensive as ALL ELEVEN AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN THE US FLEET.
so your proposal is to launch 12 carriers worth of disposable munitions at a battle group.
With by he way still no guarantee of success
@@sparkzbarcaThat's the MIC price you're quoting plus the kick back to you too; China could manufactured those weapons for under $10 B or maybe even less. Those weapons are meant for just one fleet, maybe two or three carriers and thirty destroyers and if not enough, quantity will never be a problem. The sole aim is never to let the warmongers see the sunshine again.
@@sparkzbarca By the most conservative estimates, China already has anywhere between 5 to 10 million drones of all shapes and sizes plus 10,000 to 30,000 hypersonic missiles of various ranges backed by 100,000 or more ballistics and cruise missiles. The 313 military bases around China have been under constant surveillance by Chinese satellites. Moreover, China's telecommunication technology is top notched and America's jamming technology isn't really up to par. However, the Chinese will never be the one to fire the first shot.
内容不错，就是为什么读个稿子也不找个口语专业的
zan
So funny to fear monger about any other navy in the world as the USA.. ahahahah
No arrest cables, china no vtol drones
They copy that project in the avengers movie for sure an american movie.. China in best in the in copy paste
Nyahh all are fake even xiping is making fakeryyy
好丑
Hope they have plenty of lifeboats for the damage control crew onboard.
Worlds first: Turkey 🇹🇷
U.S, China, Russia, French, uk, india, Pakistan, Japan. S Korea, Italy, then turkey….. long way to go.
@@aj777mc8 None of them have a dedicated AC for drones !!!
Yes turkey has the edge on this one, but is it dedicated only to drones?
狗中哈士奇，国中土耳其！😂
...Because spy satellites can't see ships???
CCP r&d
Xi't class (pronounced shit class)
Thats all you can do? Sourgrape bigtime! 😅😅😅
@@julianchung9215 we the west invented everything that china copies because china can't invent, BIG TIME 🤣😂🤣😂
@@julianchung9215 you are already suffering as you must like a commie dog, sure there is more we can do, we can Xi't you
If you hate leave then annoying westerner
@@user-mc2oc6jw9qKeep barking, dog. That's all you can do anyway😂