China’s Nascent Aircraft Carrier Fleet

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 29 авг 2024
  • China’s Nascent Aircraft Carrier Fleet
    By Eric Wertheim
    April 2020 Proceedings Vol. 146/4/1,406
    China has been rapidly expanding its aircraft carrier capabilities in recent years. The country currently operates two aircraft carriers: the Liaoning, a refurbished Soviet-era vessel, and the domestically built Type 001A carrier. Additionally, China is developing more advanced carriers, such as the Type 002 and Type 003, which will feature enhanced capabilities and larger air wings. These developments reflect China's growing naval power and its ambitions to become a major maritime force.

Комментарии • 288

  • @MarvinChenFantasy
    @MarvinChenFantasy 9 месяцев назад +19

    001 reverse engineering
    002 practicing
    003 mastering
    ........
    Free world of manufacturing.

    • @rizon72
      @rizon72 8 месяцев назад +2

      Nope, 003 is a different type of carrier. They've gone back to practicing, will take 3-10 years plus about 2-4 more designs even get close to being proficient.

    • @living2ndchildhood598
      @living2ndchildhood598 7 месяцев назад

      The 3 aircraft carriers are:
      LAIONING, Type 001, CV-16
      SHANDONG, Type 001A, CV-17
      FUJIAN, Tupe 002, CV-18
      Get the facts straight!

    • @raidenj1295
      @raidenj1295 5 месяцев назад +2

      004 dominating

    • @rizon72
      @rizon72 5 месяцев назад

      @@raidenj1295 Not convinced it will be dominating. Is it even laid down? Will they ever get around to it with other problems?

    • @raidenj1295
      @raidenj1295 5 месяцев назад

      @@rizon72 005 destroying

  • @juvezhang1715
    @juvezhang1715 9 месяцев назад +13

    10 years ago Elon Musk was laugh when he was asked about Chinese EV car .now EM said Chinese EV is main Competitor not Toyota not VW not even Ford😂😂😂222

  • @KirenKK-te7pb
    @KirenKK-te7pb 5 месяцев назад +2

    Making a functional Aircraft Carrier is an indigenous achievement in itself. Alongwith shorebased DF21 and digitised Space and Surface based ISR ,one supposes that China has come of age and only has to synergise her " doctrine, policy and procedures". She has functional air and water UGVs both for surveillance and lethality under productional matrices of self sufficiency too. Her EW has become professional.

  • @CN_MightyDragon
    @CN_MightyDragon 8 месяцев назад +4

    China military in Western Media: Weak, naive, copy&paste. China military during Joint session of the United States Congress: Thanos

  • @gxsflomda
    @gxsflomda 11 месяцев назад +1

    Anglo us Jewi anti-China bastards bitch collective gaffe orgasm hahaha🤣China have best conventional aircraft carrier also best anti-ship missile system can completely destroy jew us stale navy🤣🤣

  • @almezamorra1021
    @almezamorra1021 10 месяцев назад +8

    funny how navies say that carriers are the safest where in fact they are the primary targets.

    • @floydhuang220
      @floydhuang220 3 месяца назад +1

      so what's the point, US got 11 of it

    • @Wolfie142_
      @Wolfie142_ 8 дней назад

      probably because how much defense they have

    • @DontUputThatEvilOnMe
      @DontUputThatEvilOnMe 8 дней назад

      Well they know that so they are always very protected.

  • @SteamboatWilley
    @SteamboatWilley 5 месяцев назад

    This is a pretty comprehensive report and one of the best youtube videos I've seen so far regarding China's aircraft carrier fleet. Have a like.

  • @kanpakloykan7105
    @kanpakloykan7105 5 месяцев назад +1

    Year 1. : Buy recond carrier
    Year 2 : Learning curve to build one
    Year 3 Comission own carrier
    Year 4 Start building own 2 nd
    Carrier
    Year 5 : Built building super carier
    Year 6 : Mass produce super carrier
    year 7: Dragon super naval fleet. Year9 8 : Load kf fhe sea. Master in charge.

  • @---wc2zp
    @---wc2zp Месяц назад

    Varyag - Rusty scrap of metal
    Liaoning - Painted scrap of Metal 😂

  • @user-qb6yf4cf7f
    @user-qb6yf4cf7f 7 месяцев назад +2

    What an interesting ski jump.

  • @pikminlord343
    @pikminlord343 Год назад +5

    Neat!

  • @nobullman5853
    @nobullman5853 Год назад +5

    Dont worry about it, until they got the dark lady secret weapon at the helm

  • @johnwang2882
    @johnwang2882 7 месяцев назад +1

    shandong is type 002

  • @zeppirl
    @zeppirl 5 месяцев назад +1

    There building them at a very impressive rate. Out building the US at a rate of 5/1.

  • @MrSmokeyroo
    @MrSmokeyroo 6 месяцев назад

    Please note all three are based on the same 55.000 tonne hull.

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 5 месяцев назад +1

      Citation please.

    • @danwelterweight4137
      @danwelterweight4137 5 месяцев назад +1

      Wrong, the third is a completely different design.

  • @youngjet63
    @youngjet63 Год назад +1

    Keep ‘em coming billyboy!!!

    • @Reformamposss
      @Reformamposss Год назад

      Brics will coming first...to attack usa economy

  • @Quedemut
    @Quedemut 7 месяцев назад

    My nephew love you

  • @teodytrinidad9497
    @teodytrinidad9497 Год назад +1

    Have Showed

  • @peterleung8372
    @peterleung8372 Год назад +1

    Then number war

  • @Rainberna
    @Rainberna Год назад +4

    ¿So...? ¿Is it better to act or react?

  • @leehale5828
    @leehale5828 9 месяцев назад +7

    It is true that that our Chinese friends show great potential, after all, the Japanese had a very effective carrier fleet in WW2 and the Chinese are pretty competitive with Japan these days. Now, getting down to business, I am impressed that China has finally dropped the Russian carrier design and opted to follow the best and begin copying the USA designs of the Nimitz and Gerald R Ford Classes. The internet comes in very handy when searching for those modern design options. I'm guessing they also watched Top Gun a lot and thought, we should get one or two of those. It is worth remembering that the US Navy has been operating aircraft carriers for over 100 years, throughout WW2, the Korean & Vietnam wars and a host of actions in the Middle East. I hope our Chinese brothers don't take too much offense, but they have a lot of catching up to do. It would be wise for the USA to pay close attention to their carrier development, it would be a shame to get caught flat-footed as we did in Pearl in 41.

    • @RealAmbientofficial
      @RealAmbientofficial 9 месяцев назад +6

      Remember when the US banned Huawai and other Chinese companies from importing American Semi Conductors, and within 9 months they built their own?, The American government had predicted it'll take the half a decade - so yea

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 8 месяцев назад

      There is a reason why the Chinese civilization has been around for 5000 years in one form or another. Its because Chinese people have a dexterity that will make a western mind spin. You cant stop these people once they put their mind to something.

    • @no1toolmkr
      @no1toolmkr 7 месяцев назад

      the CCP isn't "developing"anything, they're stealing the technology. it's unlikely that they will ever "catch up" when all they do is steal, copy, and consequently follow the leader...

    • @ezdez3687
      @ezdez3687 5 месяцев назад

      @putinsgambit3801 Revenge of the century

    • @no1toolmkr
      @no1toolmkr 5 месяцев назад +1

      FYI, you can't win by copying your opponent...

  • @QuizmasterLaw
    @QuizmasterLaw Год назад +15

    In light of China's navy making port-of-call visits to Cuba we should take claims of intent to build at least one CVN in earnest.
    Unnoted here, perhaps elsewhere, are the horrific attrition rates suffered in training up Chinese carrier pilots. The stats about total pilot training deaths are too high to be believed, though it is certain that there have been fatal accidents to pilots. Also of note is the fact China already operates around a half dozen LPH in various configurations. Industrial "choke" points for the PLAN are 1) jet engines for aircraft 2) steam or electric catapaults. We can anticipate persistent and repeated Chinese efforts at stealing these two key technologies.

    • @aitorbleda8267
      @aitorbleda8267 Год назад +16

      They already have electromagnetic catapults, and considering they have the longest linear motor railway in the world, no need to steal technology.
      As for the engines.. they finally succeded in doing reliable copies of Russian engines.

    • @mirror452
      @mirror452 Год назад

      Westerners are so pathetic.
      "Those Chinese have electromagnetic catapults which even we didn't get to work! They must have stolen our technology!"
      :D
      Keep coping, your dream of global hegemony is over.

    • @The136th
      @The136th Год назад +8

      @@aitorbleda8267 It's not copies of Russian Engines lol. WS engines are adapted from CFM engines

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 Год назад

      You have training deaths and industrial chokepoints but we can anticipate repeated crying about any Chinese technology you try to steal as yours.

    • @chumom
      @chumom 9 месяцев назад

      美国也窃取过俄罗斯和中国的技术,你怎么不说,美国就窃取过中国的电磁炝和东风弹道导弹的技术😂

  • @rockandroll7017
    @rockandroll7017 11 месяцев назад

    Fight than know

  • @uddinislah3042
    @uddinislah3042 Год назад +5

    We'll done China

    • @jakecrawford9787
      @jakecrawford9787 Год назад

      I didn't know China made anything "well" ROFL

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 9 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@jakecrawford9787Lmaoo still living in the 80s?
      - Tesla's batteries invented by Chinese company CATL
      - Built space station alone
      - Beidou > GPS accuracy
      - NIO smoking all EV competition
      - Huawei's 5G
      - Hypersonics
      - Railway tech

    • @ericwang1036
      @ericwang1036 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@jakecrawford9787rule number 1 for all Americans, automatically look down on your opponent.

  • @leihtory7423
    @leihtory7423 Год назад +1

    in 2009 Post WW2 Japan was the first to launch a carrier in East Asia.
    China responded to this escalation with their own carrier.
    Repurposing an old rusted soviet museum piece. China bought another carrier the Minsk its still a museum piece.

  • @CityhallCityhall-bx5cv
    @CityhallCityhall-bx5cv 10 месяцев назад

    China not lol he has good tecknology & power

  • @allgoo1990
    @allgoo1990 Год назад +7

    It's very interesting to see them in real life battle and how long it lasts.

    • @MJTUEN
      @MJTUEN Год назад +17

      That will depend on "IF" US dares to make the first shot. LOL LOL LOL

    • @ylstorage7085
      @ylstorage7085 Год назад +22

      as long as you are conscripted into that war and dumped right into the front line, I will be very interested too.

    • @superpooper_2030
      @superpooper_2030 Год назад

      Bugeridiot, the PLA just slapped Uncle Sam invader in Taiwan strait witnessed by Canada doggy

    • @felixwang8321
      @felixwang8321 Год назад +1

      6s

    • @weiwang1309
      @weiwang1309 Год назад

      it's very interesting if u pussi have that ball to make a move

  • @hapitpalag8401
    @hapitpalag8401 10 месяцев назад +1

    plastic aircraft carrier

  • @ronaldsave7091
    @ronaldsave7091 Год назад

    Only one can fly lol

  • @bjolly8924
    @bjolly8924 3 месяца назад

    What a joke.

  • @ryanbarnes1733
    @ryanbarnes1733 Год назад

    Yeah, you have any practice in the world shooting at a 1500 mph vehicle dude. What a joke of a branch of service.

    • @ericwang1036
      @ericwang1036 6 месяцев назад

      USA power over China is true
      USA look down on opponent before war is true
      USA not a friendly country to live in is true
      USA dangerous crime within society also true

  • @curlsongreen2162
    @curlsongreen2162 Год назад +3

    Is it true that it takes 48 hrs to start one of these things because of the ineffective turbine operation?

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 Год назад +7

      It's already among the largest carriers sailing with large aircraft smoothly. The country makes all kinds of other engines for other vehicles too.

  • @amantemarinas2182
    @amantemarinas2182 11 месяцев назад +19

    China has no experience fighting naval battles. The UK has centuries of experience. The US fought great naval battles in WWII. The Chinese navy might just turn out like Russia's vaunted armed forces.

    • @trigger4017
      @trigger4017 11 месяцев назад +2

      Don’t forget Vietnam and deserts storm navy was involved in both
      And the British have to Falklands war

    • @duyataksis5210
      @duyataksis5210 11 месяцев назад +11

      Cope.

    • @bingshao-cp5wk
      @bingshao-cp5wk 11 месяцев назад +47

      The United States has not fought a naval war in 75 years. What are you bragging about? Of course, I have fought against farmers in Iraq and Afghanistan and have rich experience. In five years, China will have 6 aircraft carriers, 4 076 amphibious assault ships, 24 055 cruisers, 50 052d destroyers, 60 054a and 054b frigates, and 90 submarines, including 35 nuclear submarines. Let the American pirates fight! Find combat experience with China!

    • @trigger4017
      @trigger4017 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@bingshao-cp5wk china doesn’t got squat in experience
      We got friends to practice with and pirates really 🤨

    • @guineapiig8089
      @guineapiig8089 11 месяцев назад +30

      You’re spot on. I’m fairly certain the Royal Navy’s experience fighting the Spanish Armada will come in handy against the PLAN.

  • @jakecrawford9787
    @jakecrawford9787 Год назад +9

    Aww that is adorable. Look at China trying to compete with our Navy. So cute. 😆😆😆

    • @wolftone4818
      @wolftone4818 Год назад +33

      You won’t find it adorable in a decade.

    • @fatronjones
      @fatronjones Год назад +1

      CCP is collapsing

    • @joey3291
      @joey3291 Год назад +20

      You can't be serious right? China now deploys much more tonnage and much more advanced ships than the US navy every year, at a much lower costs.

    • @user-lo4wl9hg7y
      @user-lo4wl9hg7y Год назад +2

      @@joey3291where did they steal all that research from to be able to make them cheaper 😂

    • @joey3291
      @joey3291 Год назад +1

      @@user-lo4wl9hg7y Good one, then when do you think the US can steal the hypersonic missile tech from China?

  • @blackmamba3427
    @blackmamba3427 Год назад +1

    World class junk 😅

    • @amunra5330
      @amunra5330 8 месяцев назад +1

      Junk that floats and that can blow US Missile Cruisers out of the water - anyways......good luck with the pronoun debate.

  • @KuDastardly
    @KuDastardly Год назад +3

    If we've seen China's typical construction quality standards in many projects, both civilian and military, both domestic and foreign, building the Type-004 carrier as a nuclear type isn't gonna sound all that promising of a good idea.
    Yes, I know they have nuclear-powered subs, but they're relatively new by just under a few years, and they're nothing sophisticated compared to a nuclear-run supercarrier.

    • @youarebeingtrolled6954
      @youarebeingtrolled6954 Год назад +37

      U still living in 90s😂

    • @pathat8869
      @pathat8869 Год назад +9

      Correct and China does not need nuclear powered aircraft carriers for first and second island chain. China would likely need aircraft carriers beyond the second island chain(third island chain).

    • @mjabb02
      @mjabb02 Год назад +9

      their 1st nuclear sub is in the 70s

    • @fuqingshen
      @fuqingshen Год назад

      There is some stupidity in your reply. Do you still believe in poor-quality Chinese engineering, construction, and technology? You must be living high in some mountains like a Hillbilly then. China has landed on the far side of the moon and is poised to put a man on the moon before the end of this decade. They are the first country to send a rover to Mars on the first attempt and have an impeccable record of making sure every Long March rocket launched is perfect. What have the Americans done other than try to stop the Chinese by creating roadblocks and trouble to slow down their immediate competitor? It looks like you are still dreaming. The Chinese have arrived and are here to stay.

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 Год назад +1

      The u.s. banned Huawei cell phone for iphone certainly not because of their inferior quality.

  • @certaintngs2000
    @certaintngs2000 Год назад +5

    Could you direct me to the pictures (no CGI pictures) of Fujian's catapults with out the covers? Until I see them it is just CCP propaganda and lies that the COMMUNIST, western main stream media is feeding us, I would hope you have a better prospective (intel)???? In your report I do not hear any skepticism, about CCP....claims?

    • @eldesconocido1242
      @eldesconocido1242 Год назад

      so, you said that the US naval institute are so dumb to belive a CCP false propaganda?

    • @certaintngs2000
      @certaintngs2000 Год назад

      @@eldesconocido1242 I have watch the video again, to make sure I had not missed anything! I gave the 'US Naval Institute' an affirmation, that their, Intelligence Information is far superior to what I can garner.
      But (head), I still did not hear any 'HINT' of SKEPTICISM about CCP, CLAIMS" in their narrative! Now maybe the Institute has been muzzled by the White House, dictatorship of state.
      All the information in this video is readily availed and well presented.
      Now if I am in error in anything I have just said, please, elucidate.....and also do not read between the lines, especially when it is not there.

    • @mjabb02
      @mjabb02 Год назад +20

      i dont think they care whether you believe it or not.

    • @certaintngs2000
      @certaintngs2000 Год назад +1

      @@mjabb02 First, I ask a simple question of interest, with a bit of concern. the second comment I made, was responding to what @el desconcido, had commenting about my question. Maybe you can see I can't!
      As to the U.S. Naval Institute, if this @el desconcido was answering on their behave, then he should learn to chose his words more carefully. Example: There are no pictures of that carrier with out covers over the cats in the public domain. That would have put an end to question.
      So that leaves us with you....a trouble maker, I have my Boxing Gloves on, which makes it hard to type...but more fun!!!

    • @mjabb02
      @mjabb02 Год назад +14

      @@certaintngs2000 they already have a working prototype of both steam and EMALS catapult publicly known to everyone. 2ndly they are the world leader in maglev train which use same principle as EMALS catapult. 3rd, they already have 2 type of aircraft prototype that compatible with catapult launch (J-15B & J-35) that are already flying. 4th, your opinion or believe matters little to them. They probably prefer the US to believe they don't have the catapult and sit back without worrying about China.

  • @fatronjones
    @fatronjones Год назад +1

    Made in China 😆 🤣 😂

  • @virgiljones4808
    @virgiljones4808 10 месяцев назад

    China originally said that the carrier they got from the Ukraine was going to be used as a casino in Macau. The US has more blue water cruise ships than Chinas navy. I think i will sleep pretty good for another decade or two before i start getting worried. Both those carriers look like piles of crap..what a waste of money!

    • @Ryan-pw9uy
      @Ryan-pw9uy 10 месяцев назад +4

      Hoping you stick around for a decade or two 🙏

    • @virgiljones4808
      @virgiljones4808 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@Ryan-pw9uy please spend your time hoping for something that needs it

    • @Ryan-pw9uy
      @Ryan-pw9uy 10 месяцев назад +1

      @@virgiljones4808 Okay thank you

    • @_Chad_ThunderCock
      @_Chad_ThunderCock 9 месяцев назад +1

      The first 2 carriers are mainly just test and practice platforms, the 3rd carrier should be when we start seeing real blue water activities

    • @therealdeal2163
      @therealdeal2163 9 месяцев назад

      You do know that a navy cannot stop hypersonic missiles from reaching your shores and taking out your home whilst you sleep don't you ? No??? Ok sleep soundly .....😂😂😂😂

  • @curlsongreen2162
    @curlsongreen2162 Год назад +1

    tofu dregg ships.... wont stand a chance against somali pirates

    • @tritium1998
      @tritium1998 Год назад +8

      The ships are still standing and even your token Somalis aren't obeying you.

    • @pohmoh3590
      @pohmoh3590 Год назад +1

      Ask Somali pirates. Chinese warships on anti piracy patrols from Djibouti base since 2000s.

    • @WildsDreams45
      @WildsDreams45 Год назад +1

      Only a fool would underestimate the abilities of another fool. It's best to keep our enemy close and take their efforts seriously.

    • @lavione
      @lavione Год назад

      我不认为我们是真正的敌人@@WildsDreams45

  • @garyeuscher4499
    @garyeuscher4499 Год назад +3

    3 USN subs can sink the whole PLA navy in a comfortable 10 days.
    Chinese ships have Chinese quality.
    PLA navy will be a rust bucket in years!

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 Год назад +36

      lol dream on, none of your 60 year old rubiish works, 5 chinese hypersonic missile can sink entire US carrier groups, 65 0f them can sink entire US navy, china has 1.2 million missiles

    • @davidyu3815
      @davidyu3815 Год назад

      No you wouldn't little boy.
      See, here's a thing though, you guys said the SAME THING about the Chinese in Korea and guess what? You guys with all your NAVAL SUPERIORITY, AIR SUPERIORITY, LOGISTICAL SUPERIORITY, TANK SUPERIORITY, PLUS 21 UNITED NATION MEMBERS got DRIVEN BACK BY the IMPOVERISHED, ILLITERATE, STARVING, CHINESE PEASANTS whom had NO AIR SUPPORT, NO NAVY, NO TANKS, NO LOGISTICS, NO COMMUNICATIONS back to the 38th PARALLEL.
      Look at this TRASH, you kidding me? With all those ADVANTAGES and America and her 21 UN members STILL GOT DRIVEN BACK AND LOST. If you guys can't even beat China in 1950 when China was POOR, INDUSTRY IN RUINS, JUST CAME OUT FROM TWO WARS (SINO-JAPANESE WAR & CHINESE CIVIL WAR) WITH AMMUNITION INCOMPATIBILITY PROBLEMS, DO NOT BOTHER COMING OVER HERE FIGHTING CHINA in the 21st CENTURY.
      And we see the SAME SHIT, DIFFERENT DAY in Vietnam, Cuba (Bay of Pigs), Somalia (Moghadishu), Iran (failed hostage rescue), and Afghanistan. It's like almost EVERYWHERE you guys go, you guys lose. It's PATHETIC to say the least. So what is your MILITARY GOOD FOR if it CAN'T EVEN WIN?
      Why don't you guys START BEATING GOAT HERDERS (Afghanistan) and FARMERS (Vietnam) and then we can talk about beating modern China.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Come fuck with China's navy and you guys will fucking DIE. Wanna know why son? YOUR GOVERNMENT
      - The U.S government
      - The United States government
      - The American government
      - The federal government of the United States
      - Uncle Sam
      RAN OFFICIAL MILITARY SIMULATIONS WARGAMES against China and guess what? In almost EVERY SINGLE military wargame that came out of the PENTAGON, the U.S navy is either:
      1. Destroyed completely
      2. Driven back with IMMENSIVE CASUALTIES (we're talking about multiple American carrier groups WIPED OUT).
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      In case MOFOS like you didn't get the memo, China have OVER THE HORIZON radars that can see your carrier groups from over the horizons as well as satellites that can see 1000 kilometers deeps into the ocean that can detect American subs like an X RAY.
      Hell, even China have underwater listening devices that can locate the American subs the MOMENT they leave port from Guam. China also have HYPERSONIC MISSILES that are designed to destroy American Aegis system warships and wipe out ENTIRE American carrier groups.
      I WISH a motherfucker would come over here and fuck with China. If YOU think you can win, WHY, DON'T YOU, GO, SIGN, UP, FOR, THE, U.S NAVY, TODAY?

    • @pathat8869
      @pathat8869 Год назад +18

      Remember, the Chinese navy in the first and second island chain will be under the protection and cover of land and air based anti ship ballistic,cruise and hypersonic missiles.

    • @pathat8869
      @pathat8869 Год назад +10

      Remember china is not going to fight US navy head on. China has hundreds of land and air based anti ship ballistic and cruise missiles. China is also developing anti ship hypersonic missiles.

    • @jcucfun
      @jcucfun Год назад +3

      my boy got a big mouth