this ship is still just a step for PLAN.the most important mission of her is train the chinese pilots and sailors asap.we chinese still have a long way to go.keep moving my beloved people.🎉🎉🎉
Love watching your nation’s progress from across the pacific. Wishing the PRC a speedy development of naval power, and may we never find ourselves on opposite sides of a war. Wishing for peace, prosperity and progress from the USA!
@@thelordchancellor3454 thx for ur heartwarming words.I hope we two power never go to war.a boy from US dont have any reson to kill another boy from china.may peace and love dominate the world.
Before embarking in such expensive project, test has been confucted on ground first before implementing on the actual aircaft carrier. SCMP has aleeady reported successful test on the Fujian on the 4th Trial by the video camera on board the fighter jet launching off.
I actually cannot express how genuinely criminaly underated this channel and video actually is and this world and community actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and ❤😂🎉🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
Looking forward to the Fujian carrying her full complement of aircraft. It will be interesting if the Fujian turns out to be the prototype of the next few Carriers, possibly with the incorporation of nuclear powerplants (where China is becoming a VERY significant global player, certainly for domestic generation capacity, with the World's first Thorium - Molten Salt system under construction).
@@thelordchancellor3454 Kevin Walmsley covered this in his YT programme "Inside China Business". Here's the relevant link - ruclips.net/video/wShNPV-Yjbs/видео.html&ab_channel=InsideChinaBusiness His Channel provides concise and information - dense 10 minute summaries on how China is progressing (and fast), and is very well worth subscribing to.
@@thelordchancellor3454 Nuclear-related information is classified in China. There will be no detailed information, only some public information. Public information states that it is planned to be completed and put into use in 2029. More detailed information will be released at that time.
The new video doesn't have any new information. We already know in 2023 that Fujian's catapult system is functioning, new information would be using its catapult to launch a jet successfully.
It might be practical for the PLAN to use the GJ-11 or some other UAV for the first live test of the 003's EMALS. Doing so would eliminate pilot risk associated with a manned takeoff, & also start off with an easier test (since the GJ-11 would be lighter than a J-35 or KJ-600). This would be consistent with the PLA's approach to product development - small, incremental, but fast steps.
The Ford is said to have a reliability problem with its EMALS. It is failing on average, at15% of its rated life. Last I heard, a redsign is not forthcoming until 2025. The Ford uses an AC electrical system and the Fujian uses a DC electricaly system. As pointed out in the commentary, all eyes are on the Fujian launching its varied array of aircraft, even though the ground simiulator shows no problems.
China has a 30 km long maglev railway that has been in operation for 20 years. I believe that China has accumulated enough technical experience in DC electromagnetic drive technology.
1 Type 052D class destroyer and 2 Type 071 class amphibious ships recently visited Vietnam. I'm glad that the Sinosphere brothers can still cooperate with each other, America's political expansion and imposition should not be present here, besides the video is still good as always
Slight error when you said that the Fujian's EMALs (electromagnetic catapults) are a step up from the steam catapults used on the majority of American aircraft carriers. While this is technically true, it comes off as though the USA hasn't developed the technology herself. She has and is outfitting it as standard on the Gerald R Ford Aircraft carriers. If you want to use EMALs as a way of pointing to an area of Chinese superiority, focus on the fact that Chinese EMALs use direct current while US EMALs use alternating current so Chinese EMALs are more efficient.
I mean, what does "majority" mean to you? it's factually correct, he then goes on to say to explain that the Gerald R Fords have EMALS. Sounds like you took the comment the wrong way.
@@jake7824 You don't understand, do you? I said it is *TECHNICALLY TRUE* that the majority of US carriers have steam catapults. The way he said it, it came off as though he was presenting EMALs as a technology the US doesn't have. That and it is unfair to expect the US to have EMALs on the majority on her carriers, because EMALs is a very recent technology. And if you want to play that game, the US has more aircraft carriers than china, they are all CATOBAR, AND they are all nuclear powered while the majority of China's aircraft carriers are STOBAR. China's EMALs can be considered to be more advanced than America's because China's EMALs use the more efficient Direct current while American EMALs use the less efficient alternating curreent. Both are fielding their first EMALs carriers, so it really felt unfair to say that EMALs isn't on the majority of US carriers since America hadn't the time to put them on most of her carriers, so it felt like a half-truth
It is too early to state which EMALS is more advanced or superior. The two systems are not necessarily designed for the same target platforms. For the American version, only the nuclear powered aircraft carriers are expected to have EMALS and the carrier reactors have ample power output to recharge its EMALS rather quickly (said to be within 45 seconds of a launch). The real issue is not efficiency but reliability. The EMALS on USS Gerald R. Ford has failed to meet the USN's target of 4166 launches between failure so far and the USN does not expect that target to be met until 2030. The PLAN is not going to release any statistics on the reliability of its EMALS for sure. So any meaningful comparison is unlikely.
@@lagrangewei I'll take you don't read and you don't understand "connotations" for £500, no, not $500, £500. If you had read my comment properly before responding you would have read "While this is technically true, it comes off as though the USA hasn't developed the technology herself." as in I am aware the majority of US CVNs don't use EMALs, I just interpreted the way Eurasian Naval Insight said it as rejecting the fact that America developed EMALs to. EMCAT is new technology for both, differnece is, America has had catobar carriers for much longer than China has and it is unfair to say "majority of US carriers" becuase the US hasn't had the time to build enough Gerald R Ford CVNs yet, not because the USA developed EMCATs much later than China.
the only thing for sure is the first real eject will comming soon, most probably within this year but not that soon, there is a rumor says first eject will be before 10.1, Chinese national day, i mean the ship still under tests and personal are under basic training for first flight test, the land based test facility on 荒地村 naval airport site do greatly improved the process, however there should be more dead weight eject test for collecting basic data for the 4 initial maritime carrier aircraft, the J15T J35 KJ600 and GJ11, the operators should at least know how to set the ejector for these planes, the test will at least take few months, by then you can see hundreds of dead weight ejection test happen in either jiangnan ship yard or naval bases the ship is still undergoing function tests, and now it is testing sailing ability and equipments, as far as i guess, the whole procedure will be sailing-electronic-living-controlling-ejection-arrest-commandingGJ11, oreload-refueling-cooperating finally will be a full drill as i call it, the fujian will go outer sea with a whole fleet, carries more than 10 j15t and the pre-production batch of J35 and a kj600 and a GJ11, the liaoning and shandong will be a "enermy" with another fleet, as the final SIT test after that the ship will be a real warship, the day will be at least 2026 or 2027 USS Ford did this in 2022 as i remembered
In order to exercising the Chinese 🇨🇳 PLAN Anti-Access / Area Denial strategy, the three Aircraft Carriers, including the 001 Liaoning, 002 Shandong and 003 Fujian will play an important role to stop enemy’s warships enter ing the South China Sea from Guam (Area Denial). While the DF missiles and PLA Airforce will be responsible for Anti-Access.
I mean I still really like the design of Italian multi role frigates! by the looks its about the same or even better than the 054a, idk about firepower.
Would have been better had they installed conventional catapults to immediately start aircraft takeoffs and continue trials on EM version, retrofitting them after successful shore based trials
have you noticed how the New Chinese Fujian aircraft carrier's hangar doors are significantly thinner than the US Navy's hangar division doors on its aircraft carriers? This is suggesting its ability to withstand damage or damage control is inferior.
If you think this is not a big issue just ask the Imperial Japanese Navy what happened to their aircraft carriers or ask the crew of the Moskva. Oh wait, they are all dead
You are absolutely right. The United States sent an electromagnetic ejection aircraft carrier of more than 80,000 tons for China to copy and paste. Won't American allies copy and paste?
this ship is still just a step for PLAN.the most important mission of her is train the chinese pilots and sailors asap.we chinese still have a long way to go.keep moving my beloved people.🎉🎉🎉
Wow!! There are already two Chinese carriers and you still think these are training carrier. Your skin color will never turn white.
So China can keep going with it's illegal plans for the south Asia Sea
In short time Fujian will be an artificial reef and a footnote in naval development.
Love watching your nation’s progress from across the pacific. Wishing the PRC a speedy development of naval power, and may we never find ourselves on opposite sides of a war. Wishing for peace, prosperity and progress from the USA!
@@thelordchancellor3454 thx for ur heartwarming words.I hope we two power never go to war.a boy from US dont have any reson to kill
another boy from china.may peace and love dominate the world.
Before embarking in such expensive project, test has been confucted on ground first before implementing on the actual aircaft carrier.
SCMP has aleeady reported successful test on the Fujian on the 4th Trial by the video camera on board the fighter jet launching off.
i am glad that Modern Warships Developer buff Fujian Carrier
I actually cannot express how genuinely criminaly underated this channel and video actually is and this world and community actually genuinely needs more people actually like you in this world and this is actually the actual real China that the actual American and British BBC propaganda mainstream media actually don't show you is actually really like and actually capable of actually doing and damm and ❤😂🎉🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
[ 0:00 ]
“Hello there.”
GENERAL EURASIA!
Looking forward to the Fujian carrying her full complement of aircraft. It will be interesting if the Fujian turns out to be the prototype of the next few Carriers, possibly with the incorporation of nuclear powerplants (where China is becoming a VERY significant global player, certainly for domestic generation capacity, with the World's first Thorium - Molten Salt system under construction).
You peak my interest with the Thorium-Liquid Salt reactor, could you point me to any sources about this project?
@@thelordchancellor3454 Kevin Walmsley covered this in his YT programme "Inside China Business". Here's the relevant link - ruclips.net/video/wShNPV-Yjbs/видео.html&ab_channel=InsideChinaBusiness His Channel provides concise and information - dense 10 minute summaries on how China is progressing (and fast), and is very well worth subscribing to.
Type 004 would most likely be nuclear powered.
@@thelordchancellor3454 Tried to reply but YT deleted my comment See - ruclips.net/video/wShNPV-Yjbs/видео.html&ab_channel=InsideChinaBusiness
@@thelordchancellor3454 Nuclear-related information is classified in China. There will be no detailed information, only some public information. Public information states that it is planned to be completed and put into use in 2029. More detailed information will be released at that time.
Well done China 🇨🇳🇨🇳👍
The new video doesn't have any new information. We already know in 2023 that Fujian's catapult system is functioning, new information would be using its catapult to launch a jet successfully.
It might be practical for the PLAN to use the GJ-11 or some other UAV for the first live test of the 003's EMALS. Doing so would eliminate pilot risk associated with a manned takeoff, & also start off with an easier test (since the GJ-11 would be lighter than a J-35 or KJ-600). This would be consistent with the PLA's approach to product development - small, incremental, but fast steps.
Trust their decisions
The mid range DC EMALS has been tested hundreds of times with pilots on land already.
The Ford is said to have a reliability problem with its EMALS. It is failing on average, at15% of its rated life. Last I heard, a redsign is not forthcoming until 2025. The Ford uses an AC electrical system and the Fujian uses a DC electricaly system. As pointed out in the commentary, all eyes are on the Fujian launching its varied array of aircraft, even though the ground simiulator shows no problems.
correct... while both electromagnetic - the US and Chinese systems are different.
Remember that there are no Fat Leonards in tuch with PLAAN 😂
China has a 30 km long maglev railway that has been in operation for 20 years. I believe that China has accumulated enough technical experience in DC electromagnetic drive technology.
nice looking ship 🥰
1 Type 052D class destroyer and 2 Type 071 class amphibious ships recently visited Vietnam. I'm glad that the Sinosphere brothers can still cooperate with each other, America's political expansion and imposition should not be present here, besides the video is still good as always
yes it was very good to see Chinese ships visit Vietnam for a friendship visit. That's how it should be... Neighbors working together.
Thank You
Nice!
Slight error when you said that the Fujian's EMALs (electromagnetic catapults) are a step up from the steam catapults used on the majority of American aircraft carriers. While this is technically true, it comes off as though the USA hasn't developed the technology herself. She has and is outfitting it as standard on the Gerald R Ford Aircraft carriers. If you want to use EMALs as a way of pointing to an area of Chinese superiority, focus on the fact that Chinese EMALs use direct current while US EMALs use alternating current so Chinese EMALs are more efficient.
I mean, what does "majority" mean to you? it's factually correct, he then goes on to say to explain that the Gerald R Fords have EMALS. Sounds like you took the comment the wrong way.
@@jake7824 You don't understand, do you? I said it is *TECHNICALLY TRUE* that the majority of US carriers have steam catapults. The way he said it, it came off as though he was presenting EMALs as a technology the US doesn't have. That and it is unfair to expect the US to have EMALs on the majority on her carriers, because EMALs is a very recent technology. And if you want to play that game, the US has more aircraft carriers than china, they are all CATOBAR, AND they are all nuclear powered while the majority of China's aircraft carriers are STOBAR. China's EMALs can be considered to be more advanced than America's because China's EMALs use the more efficient Direct current while American EMALs use the less efficient alternating curreent. Both are fielding their first EMALs carriers, so it really felt unfair to say that EMALs isn't on the majority of US carriers since America hadn't the time to put them on most of her carriers, so it felt like a half-truth
It is too early to state which EMALS is more advanced or superior. The two systems are not necessarily designed for the same target platforms. For the American version, only the nuclear powered aircraft carriers are expected to have EMALS and the carrier reactors have ample power output to recharge its EMALS rather quickly (said to be within 45 seconds of a launch). The real issue is not efficiency but reliability. The EMALS on USS Gerald R. Ford has failed to meet the USN's target of 4166 launches between failure so far and the USN does not expect that target to be met until 2030. The PLAN is not going to release any statistics on the reliability of its EMALS for sure. So any meaningful comparison is unlikely.
that is not an error, it is a fact. just because you have problem understanding does not mean it is factually wrong.
@@lagrangewei I'll take you don't read and you don't understand "connotations" for £500, no, not $500, £500. If you had read my comment properly before responding you would have read "While this is technically true, it comes off as though the USA hasn't developed the technology herself." as in I am aware the majority of US CVNs don't use EMALs, I just interpreted the way Eurasian Naval Insight said it as rejecting the fact that America developed EMALs to. EMCAT is new technology for both, differnece is, America has had catobar carriers for much longer than China has and it is unfair to say "majority of US carriers" becuase the US hasn't had the time to build enough Gerald R Ford CVNs yet, not because the USA developed EMCATs much later than China.
the only thing for sure is the first real eject will comming soon, most probably within this year
but not that soon, there is a rumor says first eject will be before 10.1, Chinese national day, i mean the ship still under tests and personal are under basic training for first flight test, the land based test facility on 荒地村 naval airport site do greatly improved the process, however there should be more dead weight eject test for collecting basic data for the 4 initial maritime carrier aircraft, the J15T J35 KJ600 and GJ11, the operators should at least know how to set the ejector for these planes, the test will at least take few months, by then you can see hundreds of dead weight ejection test happen in either jiangnan ship yard or naval bases
the ship is still undergoing function tests, and now it is testing sailing ability and equipments, as far as i guess, the whole procedure will be sailing-electronic-living-controlling-ejection-arrest-commandingGJ11, oreload-refueling-cooperating finally will be a full drill as i call it, the fujian will go outer sea with a whole fleet, carries more than 10 j15t and the pre-production batch of J35 and a kj600 and a GJ11, the liaoning and shandong will be a "enermy" with another fleet, as the final SIT test
after that the ship will be a real warship, the day will be at least 2026 or 2027
USS Ford did this in 2022 as i remembered
Anyone who has been to a modern amusement park should be familiar with electromagnetic launch. Carrier catapult test videos are fun to watch for sure.
Integrated Catapult Control Station (ICCS).
I'm thinking the next Chinese carrier will be 4th gen nuclear plus EMALS. At that point, the Chinese carrier will be more advanced than the Ford.
Only if China keeps stealing YS technology
@@PaulWrightson-wb6oe dont worry. It's easy to steal from Murica. Their cybersecurity sucked LOL
How much oil need er catapult launch or emal system operating
How many more sea trials will it do??
～5
As many as needed to gather more info for future carriers.
Only lunching test. The aircraft landed somewhere else.
In order to exercising the Chinese 🇨🇳 PLAN Anti-Access / Area Denial strategy, the three Aircraft Carriers, including the 001 Liaoning, 002 Shandong and 003 Fujian will play an important role to stop enemy’s warships enter ing the South China Sea from Guam (Area Denial). While the DF missiles and PLA Airforce will be responsible for Anti-Access.
to have 3 operational carrier groups, they'll need at least 6-8 carriers to do that....
003 sea trails are moving rapidly.
Looks like China is really aiming to knock Italy out of the spot for having the most beautiful ships.
italy!? home of marco polo?
I mean I still really like the design of Italian multi role frigates! by the looks its about the same or even better than the 054a, idk about firepower.
055 is one of best looking one around
Hope you can read Chinese. That's the problem with most Chinese expert. 😢
We don't need skid marks on a Chinese aircraft carrier. 🤔 What perfect English everyone speaks. 😹
Makes me feel so jealous of China.
24x J35, 12x J15, 6x J15D, 3x KJ600.....
J15 ， not J16
@@ANLOU-j2c oops yes.... corrected... thanks
随便弹两架歼15T玩玩
的确，如果J15T可以，其它飞机都没有问题了
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩💂
Would have been better had they installed conventional catapults to immediately start aircraft takeoffs and continue trials on EM version, retrofitting them after successful shore based trials
Emal was tested on ground many years before the ship being built… 😂
They have great working maglev high speed rail.
Why would they go back to using steam train technology.
you can't retrofit a steam catapult with EMAL.... 2 systems completely different in design
这福建的发音绝对是中国人
have you noticed how the New Chinese Fujian aircraft carrier's hangar doors are significantly thinner than the US Navy's hangar division doors on its aircraft carriers? This is suggesting its ability to withstand damage or damage control is inferior.
🤣. Whatever that makes you feel better.
What's next? You gonna say their paint job is inferior too?
@@Wvk5zc well you heard them all screaming and giggling about cracks didnt you.... they all went into hiding after that
If it helps you cope 😂
If you think this is not a big issue just ask the Imperial Japanese Navy what happened to their aircraft carriers or ask the crew of the Moskva. Oh wait, they are all dead
@@miraphycs7377 Moskava was not an aircraft carrier. !!
Brit accent on Chinese Military? 🤣 Must be a joke 😂 Yeah, Britainica rules the waves 😅 Get your own carrier working first 😅
Did you watch the video? Or any of his videos, his accent aint even British. He is Chinese and nothing about his channel is anti Chinese
@@marcosburgos8415 Taiwanese*
Copy America 😂
really? in what ways?
You are absolutely right. The United States sent an electromagnetic ejection aircraft carrier of more than 80,000 tons for China to copy and paste. Won't American allies copy and paste?
UK invented flat top carrier lol...
二比卵子
@@cnmddsb 别告诉他真相，就让那帮愚民继续活在西方媒体的井里。
Don't you think the Cats should work?
J35🎉🎉🎉
White people never bring up Daniel Duggan