Battlefield 4 was probably the best battlefield in my opinion, almost all maps all had at least one event that changed a large portion of the map, something they need more of that in 2042 for sure
I was the best at having the battlefield essence. its launch was terrible but the current game is what peak battlefield looks like. levolution shouldve been expanded upon. most of the time it kinda ruined the map like in siege of shanghai but it had a lot of potential for actually making it better.
@@jarrellfernandez9341 Wait for ww3 irl, you won't be surprised. Wait why did I say that? If it brokes out then people's gaming time would be in danger.
I mean while you're right it's kinda misleading. The skyscraper in BF4 could only be destroyed by hitting its pillars not just randomly shooting at the glass. Also it was the only destructible skyscraper in the whole game, none of the other skyscrapers could be destroyed
Yeah Battlefield 4 had those levolution events that got repetitive after 5 times. Such a missed opportunity for actual destruction. The game being set in Urban China should have been an amazing place for dynamic destruction.
Battlefield 3 "Back to Karkand" expansion had a nice destruction. The basically added a lot of debris on impact. Sometimes it could change the outcome of the firefight, combined with screen shake and debris.
BF 3 destruction was so good. Hiding in rubble while an enemy tank decimated a house was good suspense. Also that one map playing Rush where you base jump down to the next point was sick af.
This is unfortunately exactly how I feel as well, I played all the battlefields up to 2042 never regretted buying a single one of them due to the countless hours of jaw dropping entertainment I got from them…. I bought 2042 and was sooo excited, I played for about an hour and hated just about every single part of the game, couldn’t of felt like more of waste of money I swear
@@theparaminuteman Unfortunately I missed playing battlefield four in its heyday but I did manage to play it for a few months in 2018, and I can firmly agree that shit slapped.
Personally I got bored of BF1 after 3 months and didn't necessarily get bored of BFV but didn't really have anyone to play it with after 4 months. But I played BF3 for roughly 3 years and BF4 for another 2-3 years. And even Hardline for nearly 2 years. 2042 I gave it a week and was completely done. Tried hopping on a couple days ago after over 400 ImPrOvEmEnTs but it's still complete garbage.
yeah but it comes handy when your team doesnt have any good pilots and the fucking vipers or z10s are dominating C. so the boat now can do some damage with the tower down@@DaDaDo661
They went towards entertainment, but the ideal game would be a mixture of Bf + Arma = a step towards realism. In Bf3 you can kill with the rubble of a building by shooting him with an RPG. At the Grand Bazaar, in the corridor, I made five kills with debris. 3 is my abso favourite, 4 is good weapon accesories update but reduced map destruction and they started production on the conweyr line. 42 is like Fortnite, CRSED, PUBG, COD orgy.
the building that collapsed on bf4 was a script and in fact it always fell the same way. in addition, it was the only building on the map to fall. buying the general destruction of bf 2042 with that of the old bf you can clearly see the qualitative leap of the physics engine
Battlefield should go back to a mix of 4 and BF1s destruction also a few cool ass maps like the earthquake ones from bf3 where buildings already are crumbling as you play
This is a totally unfair comparison… that skyscraper in 4 was a Levolution, try shooting rockets at any other tall building in BF4 on any map and it’ll do the same it did in the 2042 clip. But I also despise 2042, and BF4 is my favorite modern warfare-class FPS of all time, so I dunno why I’m standing up for 2042 here.
at least 2042 has bot support and custom servers/matches that still lets you unlock stuff it's the only battlefield game I enjoyed that came out after 2142 because I could actually create my own fun again instead of just playing through a boring campaign once then never playing again
@b1_ferg It's really not "unfair," by all rights 2042 should've had similar destruction, "Levolution" or otherwise it's still literally player controlled destruction, and BF4 has a myriad of big buildings to destroy. BF1 evolved that destruction too, being able to level basically every building on every map with some exceptions, zero excuse.
@@PvEGamingChannelLmfao only children actually want to play against bots 🥴 Introducing bots was one of the worst decisions ever made at DICE, this isn't Star Wars Battlefront or a PS2 game where half the people playing don't have internet access, nobody ever asked for bots in BF and as we've seen they're absolutely atrocious for many reasons.
@@RochRich. Plus it's not a technical issue since the BC2 maps have perfect destruction, it's a map and gameplay design issue that BF V and it's building mechanics were supposed to solve but Dice didn't follow up on this game
@@frankwainwright7826 yes!! Why don't people get this? After the tower collapses there's no cool littlebird 1v1s around the tower, running from transport helis opening fire on your team in the towers, assaulting the top through elevators, so much gameplay lost when it collapses
@@AsiaMinor12 Is that a joke? For when it came out, and still even now it has great destruction physics and you can tear down whole maps basically if it's not a legitimate city city
@@ilikecinema1234 They’re kinda right. BF4 was a step up from BF3 in that it had more unique large structures even though they weren’t destructible. Both BF3 and BF4 have sparse maps with small destructible buildings (although BF4’s large maps seem more empty), let’s just say they’re even on destruction there. For smaller, tighter maps, I’d say BF4 has less destruction than BF3 because of those indestructible structures. BF3 also let you kill players with falling rubble which they seemed to have removed in BF4 except those planks propping up the ceiling in Metro.
Okay but this is a little disingenuous, thats the one big building in bf4 that can be shot down, try it on any other one and it wont fall like that. I absolutely love bf4 but this is still misleading
tbf 2042 looks a ton better graphically but yeah i wish it had some cooler levolution. and also a more accurate comparison to bf4’s falling tower would be like the rocket on orbital
Bf4 had the same start as 2042. It was hated. People called for it to die and the makers to end it. Now it's one of the best after 2 years of bad. But hey. No one thinks of that. Spoiled. All of you.are
@@-SkyCat- They aren't spoiled bro, they, like me, spent $90 on a game. And kinda expect a $90 value. Your opinion, is just that... its ok to be critical in the entertainment world.
To be fair, if you shot at any other skyscraper in BF4, nothing would happen like 2042. Bf4 is still one of the best but just saying, this short makes it seem otherwise
The rocket is ok but you're comparing between a building in 2042 and BF4 there's no need for a rocket in either of the games but battlefield 4 had way more levolution than just a rocket
@@TankYou90 you guys are missing the point, OP was stating how there is zero levolution in 2042 except the rocket on orbital, so that would be a proper comparison. The building in BF4 fell after you destroyed specific points, it never reacted to rockets either, just like the building in 2042 doesn't.
Imagine being a general and seeing your grunts shake hands with the other side and both unanimously decide to knock down a building on top of themselves
Fun fact: The old devs of bf4 are now released a game called The Finals which is fast paced FPS that have the same destruction level and it's actually fun to play too
Games are getting worse by the year - Wolfenstein youngblood - Call of duty Vanguard - Battlefield 2042 Then you have forgotten masterpieces that have actual effort put into them - battlefield 3 - call of duty world at war - Wolfenstein the new order/ the old blood - SWAT 4
I know right, that's one main reason i didn't get Bf2042 i knew it was going to be bad before it even came out Bf4 and 3 and Bad Company 1 and 2 are so much better than that 2042 shit, game developers only care about money and not what the fans want anymore, the only game i see being great is Elden Ring coming out later on.
if you say this it means that you didn't play bf 2042 (nor any other bf), or in any case you played very little. it is the fault of people like you that 2042 will die speaking by hearsay without ever having tried it
I play battlefield games since 2002, and tried each one of them. I could say I recognize a good battlefield game when I try one. But if you think this game is better than the previous games, I respect your opinion but I disagree ☺️
God damn I remember loading up the beta of bf4 on the xbox360 and seeing this for the first time. Blew my mind and my cousins minds when they saw it. Great memory right there
Lets be honest, if any game did "Full Destruction" Right in the series, It was BF1. I mean everything there could be destroyed. Then again, every building wasn't as big as a skyscraper.
I know bf2042 didn’t have like any destruction but you still should’ve showed the space station map instead because you can destroy the rocket on that map which is pretty cool. Too bad they didn’t bring more for the game 🫤
People don't understand, obviously in 2042 they made sure the buildings won't fall like in BF4, it would cost more to rebuild it again and again so they made it indestructible
Just about every map had some sort of cool gimic that could turn the game around or just add some more immersion of the chaos of war. Absolutely love BF4.
![Battlefield 4 - All Levolution Events [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0WakZu-JR-A/mqdefault.jpg)
People shooting the glass when all you had to do was shoot the 4 cement pillars down below
I'm pretty sure there are 6 pillars, could be wrong tho
@@damn6039 it’s 4
shoot pillars not The glass
@@toddbender3463 6
@@Zeigy it's 4 just did it like 30 minutes ago
Battlefield 4 was probably the best battlefield in my opinion, almost all maps all had at least one event that changed a large portion of the map, something they need more of that in 2042 for sure
It’s different developers bro.
Battlefield 3 still exists
Most of the levolution ruined the maps tho
I was the best at having the battlefield essence. its launch was terrible but the current game is what peak battlefield looks like. levolution shouldve been expanded upon. most of the time it kinda ruined the map like in siege of shanghai but it had a lot of potential for actually making it better.
Battlefield 4 was the best for Levolution Battlefield 3 was the best combat experience from the game series at least to me
It's funny how back during Bf3 or Bfbc2 we thought, "Wow the destruction is only going to get better!"
We were so naive lol
We were such stupid fucking cunts lol
Eh, we were right with bf4 but they kinda stopped doing it after that.
BF1's entire maps were destructible.
Bf5's destruction was pretty great, not the best, but very enjoyable.
Imagine a new BF : Bf3's big maps, BF1's Atmosphere, BF4's destruction animation
If only
I would also add BF4 vehicles
@@hankscorpio7767 Please no/
@@4vR3nbut why
BF3s controls
Battlefield 3: aight who wants to level the entire map with me?
Bad Company 2 wants to have a word with you
@vesstig the sound of buildings crumbling lives rent free in my head
yeah bf3 was having a spectacular dream that night 😒
2042$ is the budget they had 💀
And they spent 1900 on marketing
^ lmfao 2042 is a waste of money.
@@jarrellfernandez9341 Wait for ww3 irl, you won't be surprised. Wait why did I say that? If it brokes out then people's gaming time would be in danger.
I like the game but the destruction sucks.
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Battlefield 4 is so good! I still play it to this day.
Obliteration!!!!!
I just played last nite on ps4
Fucking how it doesn't load anything
on ps3 the servers still fill up. unbelievable!
@@fuerstdarren1817 get a better internet service or a better console 🤣. It works perfectly fine for me.
I mean while you're right it's kinda misleading. The skyscraper in BF4 could only be destroyed by hitting its pillars not just randomly shooting at the glass. Also it was the only destructible skyscraper in the whole game, none of the other skyscrapers could be destroyed
Yeah Battlefield 4 had those levolution events that got repetitive after 5 times. Such a missed opportunity for actual destruction. The game being set in Urban China should have been an amazing place for dynamic destruction.
PS3 @@AsiaMinor12
The finale
It’s also the same animation every time, bf2042 overall looks way better
Battlefield 3 "Back to Karkand" expansion had a nice destruction. The basically added a lot of debris on impact. Sometimes it could change the outcome of the firefight, combined with screen shake and debris.
BF 3 destruction was so good. Hiding in rubble while an enemy tank decimated a house was good suspense. Also that one map playing Rush where you base jump down to the next point was sick af.
That base jump was always fun but using rubble to prone and hide and if the tank doesn't see you. It's a complete win in itself
Damavand Peak was a good rush map.
Except that 90% of people use thermal optics in tanks so it’s almost impossible to hide in BF3 and 4
I've seen that skyscraper fall down at least 100 times and it never gets old, what a beautiful destruction system that game had.
I enjoyed playing Battlefield one for about three years, Battlefield five for roughly 2 1/2 and battlefield 2042 for about two days
This is unfortunately exactly how I feel as well, I played all the battlefields up to 2042 never regretted buying a single one of them due to the countless hours of jaw dropping entertainment I got from them…. I bought 2042 and was sooo excited, I played for about an hour and hated just about every single part of the game, couldn’t of felt like more of waste of money I swear
2 min in beta was enough autism for a lifetime
And battlefield 4 for about 8 lol
@@theparaminuteman Unfortunately I missed playing battlefield four in its heyday but I did manage to play it for a few months in 2018, and I can firmly agree that shit slapped.
Personally I got bored of BF1 after 3 months and didn't necessarily get bored of BFV but didn't really have anyone to play it with after 4 months. But I played BF3 for roughly 3 years and BF4 for another 2-3 years. And even Hardline for nearly 2 years. 2042 I gave it a week and was completely done. Tried hopping on a couple days ago after over 400 ImPrOvEmEnTs but it's still complete garbage.
Miss Bf4, I remember seeing the building fall for the first time. Wondered huh why is the building shaking like that while I’m on the top floor lol
It still has a very active player base you should hop on I play all the time!
The comunnity of bf4 still on firee, try play this game again dude
I still play it till this day on my PS4
Was just gonna say you don't have to miss anything. The game is still alive and well
My thoughts exactly. Like is this ab earthquake
Ah, the fun we had on Shanghai Tower
I liked the servers where they would disable the tower from crashing
Only that building crashed. I can't see a difference then and totally scripted thing
...still have ;)
yeah but it comes handy when your team doesnt have any good pilots and the fucking vipers or z10s are dominating C. so the boat now can do some damage with the tower down@@DaDaDo661
Imagine accidentally missing your RPG shot, but you accidentally cause the building to collapse and get like a 15-man environmental killstreak
They went towards entertainment, but the ideal game would be a mixture of Bf + Arma = a step towards realism.
In Bf3 you can kill with the rubble of a building by shooting him with an RPG. At the Grand Bazaar, in the corridor, I made five kills with debris. 3 is my abso favourite, 4 is good weapon accesories update but reduced map destruction and they started production on the conweyr line. 42 is like Fortnite, CRSED, PUBG, COD orgy.
2042 symbolizes the decline of the Battlefield franchise. It looks as though the best titles are behind us :(
Y’all trippin it ain’t even been out that long
It started with BF V
@@Stefan-lr6xo the existence of women women ruined battlefield
@@sixsone look at the daily player count literally a dying game statically and content wise less
@@thecaramelbrothers2601 looks the same as bf4, bf1, and bf5 and those all turned out to be great games
Dice: ALL TIME DESTRUCTION
Game: tiny village on each map with minimal destruction. Can only break windows in main objective buildings.
“Next gen destruction” and this is what we get literally false advertising
the building that collapsed on bf4 was a script and in fact it always fell the same way. in addition, it was the only building on the map to fall. buying the general destruction of bf 2042 with that of the old bf you can clearly see the qualitative leap of the physics engine
@@alessandro445 it's still nothing like what they promised, not even any scripted skyscraper destruction at the very least
BF4 levelution looks cool but playing in ruins on Shanghai is just infuriating
Don't blame dice for the lack of Destruction
You mean Call of Apex 2042?
Call of Apex: Fortnite 2042.
No more Joe Gatto :(
Call of apex 2077
Yep because it’s definitely similar to either of those
Battlefail 2,042 players.
@@panzershrek7942 that's a fucking good one. 👏
Im glad the developers of bf3 and 4 made The Finals and now called “Embark Studios”
Battlefield should go back to a mix of 4 and BF1s destruction also a few cool ass maps like the earthquake ones from bf3 where buildings already are crumbling as you play
This is a totally unfair comparison… that skyscraper in 4 was a Levolution, try shooting rockets at any other tall building in BF4 on any map and it’ll do the same it did in the 2042 clip.
But I also despise 2042, and BF4 is my favorite modern warfare-class FPS of all time, so I dunno why I’m standing up for 2042 here.
MW2 Groundwar 💟
You aren't standing up for 2042, you're merely remarking upon the unfair comparison. Your point stands regardless. 👌
at least 2042 has bot support and custom servers/matches that still lets you unlock stuff
it's the only battlefield game I enjoyed that came out after 2142 because I could actually create my own fun again instead of just playing through a boring campaign once then never playing again
@b1_ferg It's really not "unfair," by all rights 2042 should've had similar destruction, "Levolution" or otherwise it's still literally player controlled destruction, and BF4 has a myriad of big buildings to destroy. BF1 evolved that destruction too, being able to level basically every building on every map with some exceptions, zero excuse.
@@PvEGamingChannelLmfao only children actually want to play against bots 🥴 Introducing bots was one of the worst decisions ever made at DICE, this isn't Star Wars Battlefront or a PS2 game where half the people playing don't have internet access, nobody ever asked for bots in BF and as we've seen they're absolutely atrocious for many reasons.
“Shoots the only building on that map that can fall vs one that can’t” seems logical
Excuses excuses.
Exactly. The video doesn't really have a point.
I do think bf4 was better than bf2042 but this video is pretty stupid
@@jayjaws2478
Anyone can see destruction has been downgraded in 2042, but there’s no use making false parallels
@@RochRich. Plus it's not a technical issue since the BC2 maps have perfect destruction, it's a map and gameplay design issue that BF V and it's building mechanics were supposed to solve but Dice didn't follow up on this game
They straight up lied to us about the “levelution”
How so? Levelution resulted In a complete map change on every map.
@@bubsterr741 It wasn't always that crazy of a change.
@@willo1345 half the time it ruined the map design too, Shanghai and Lancang were so much worse to play on after the levelution
@@frankwainwright7826 yes!! Why don't people get this? After the tower collapses there's no cool littlebird 1v1s around the tower, running from transport helis opening fire on your team in the towers, assaulting the top through elevators, so much gameplay lost when it collapses
No wonder 2042's new wtc won't be shown collapsing here, it will be bad for the "safest building" advertisement since 9/11 becomes a golden dark meme.
I miss when Bf4 was the main battlefield game out at the time.. lots of great memories with that one
I miss bf2 and it’s simplicity you could destroy anything and so could the enemy feels so fake now
@@beefyjesus5663 ¿BF2?
Imagine you're in the middle of an Urban battle and out of everything a building falls on you.
Levolution:” … you don’t know what I am do you?”
Yup Battlefield 4 was better
2042 is sooo cringe omfg
Not a high bar though. Battlefield 4 didn't have good destruction. Which is a shame because a third of the maps took place in Urban China.
@@AsiaMinor12 Is that a joke? For when it came out, and still even now it has great destruction physics and you can tear down whole maps basically if it's not a legitimate city city
@@ilikecinema1234
They’re kinda right. BF4 was a step up from BF3 in that it had more unique large structures even though they weren’t destructible. Both BF3 and BF4 have sparse maps with small destructible buildings (although BF4’s large maps seem more empty), let’s just say they’re even on destruction there. For smaller, tighter maps, I’d say BF4 has less destruction than BF3 because of those indestructible structures. BF3 also let you kill players with falling rubble which they seemed to have removed in BF4 except those planks propping up the ceiling in Metro.
That Levelution!!!🙌 I remember this was so epic the first time I saw this during the beta!!
Okay but this is a little disingenuous, thats the one big building in bf4 that can be shot down, try it on any other one and it wont fall like that. I absolutely love bf4 but this is still misleading
Pretty sure shooting the glass doesn't do anything in bf4. It's the pillars at the base of the building..
Ye and it's not actual destruction it's scripted
@@InFamXYT no shit Sherlock. It's still better than 2042
@@logancap076 ok?
@@InFamXYT Still better than nothing
@@watersnortmoment3734 This is not an accurate display of 2042 destruction. To make it accurate you would use the rocket on orbital
BF4 is beautiful and better
tbf 2042 looks a ton better graphically but yeah i wish it had some cooler levolution. and also a more accurate comparison to bf4’s falling tower would be like the rocket on orbital
Bf4 had the same start as 2042. It was hated. People called for it to die and the makers to end it. Now it's one of the best after 2 years of bad. But hey. No one thinks of that. Spoiled. All of you.are
@@-SkyCat- i read that in yoda's voice.
@@-SkyCat- They aren't spoiled bro, they, like me, spent $90 on a game. And kinda expect a $90 value. Your opinion, is just that... its ok to be critical in the entertainment world.
@@samhyatt4863 not really its very cartoony, bf4 looks better to me even tho the graphics are midly worse
BF4 days will never be the same in future games
Oh nice unbiased comparison, a building not programmed to fall when damaged vs the only skyscraper in BF4 programmed to fall when damaged. Very nice👌
To be fair, if you shot at any other skyscraper in BF4, nothing would happen like 2042. Bf4 is still one of the best but just saying, this short makes it seem otherwise
a more accurate comparison would be to the rocket on orbital. but yeah i wish 2042 overall had more levolution
The rocket is ok but you're comparing between a building in 2042 and BF4
there's no need for a rocket in either of the games but battlefield 4 had way more levolution than just a rocket
@@TankYou90 so lets compare a rocket in bf4 and bf2042
@@TleafarafaelT how bout just compare a random building to a random building and you’d see how bad 2042 is
Imagine in 2042 dice adding earthquakes, tsunami, landslides, avalanche, fire tornadoes, volcanic eruption.
@@TankYou90 you guys are missing the point, OP was stating how there is zero levolution in 2042 except the rocket on orbital, so that would be a proper comparison. The building in BF4 fell after you destroyed specific points, it never reacted to rockets either, just like the building in 2042 doesn't.
This is what happens when AAA game studios stop caring about their players and start caring about monetizing their games.
Imagine being a general and seeing your grunts shake hands with the other side and both unanimously decide to knock down a building on top of themselves
To be fair, BF4, that was their whole selling point. Destruction I would have to say Bad Company 2.
Love battlefield 4 ,been a veteran for many years,,, I wish battlefield 2042 was alot like 4 😩
I could just imagine what you just said in a peter Griffin voice
Thank you for your service
That was ONE building that could do that in BF4...
bad company 2 too
Shit company 2
Technically, building destruction died with BFBC2. Along with some other things that made BF unique
@@babaloons4887 no
Only the real battlefield fans know that experience
Leveloution piece by piece and Rush
To be real that moment in 2042 looked like a movie scene
i use to literally go around in bf3 and 4 with a tank or a rocket system seeing what i could destroy. so satisfying especially if players were inside.
My heart is broke 💔
Just shows Battlefield 2042 was done on the CHEAP❗ Thanks, We needed to see this 👍🏻
2042 really looks like it came out in 2012
People always jump to the SAME 1 building trying to show the destruction in bf4 lmaoooo
Fun fact: The old devs of bf4 are now released a game called The Finals which is fast paced FPS that have the same destruction level and it's actually fun to play too
Sad is all I can say for these kids to grow up like this. 👍
And they call 2042 a battlefield game
Games are getting worse by the year
- Wolfenstein youngblood
- Call of duty Vanguard
- Battlefield 2042
Then you have forgotten masterpieces that have actual effort put into them
- battlefield 3
- call of duty world at war
- Wolfenstein the new order/ the old blood
- SWAT 4
Then you go and play for free Enlisted.
Then you go and play for free Enlisted.
You do have ready or not which is pretty much the next swat as people say but this is 100% true
@@sound2706 I mean not everyone has 150 dollars
I know right, that's one main reason i didn't get Bf2042 i knew it was going to be bad before it even came out Bf4 and 3 and Bad Company 1 and 2 are so much better than that 2042 shit, game developers only care about money and not what the fans want anymore, the only game i see being great is Elden Ring coming out later on.
Those levolutions were gorgeous and gamechanging at the same time. For the record BF4 servers are still active. I get on there from time to time
Impressive, very nice.
Now let's see people shoot at a non scripted for destruction building.
Bad game vs pretty solid good game. I actually have 1400 hours on BF4 and 1 regretted hour on 2042.
Dogshit game vs the best game in the franchise...
if you say this it means that you didn't play bf 2042 (nor any other bf), or in any case you played very little. it is the fault of people like you that 2042 will die speaking by hearsay without ever having tried it
I play battlefield games since 2002, and tried each one of them. I could say I recognize a good battlefield game when I try one. But if you think this game is better than the previous games, I respect your opinion but I disagree ☺️
@@alessandro445 I've played multiple hours on it, and I can confirm it's a shit game
@@bp2888 Wait, even hardline? If so, what was your opinion on it. I believe it was a solid game.
Even the BF52 knows that the turret can handle the plane, let alone shoot at it
God damn I remember loading up the beta of bf4 on the xbox360 and seeing this for the first time. Blew my mind and my cousins minds when they saw it. Great memory right there
Lets be honest, if any game did "Full Destruction" Right in the series, It was BF1. I mean everything there could be destroyed. Then again, every building wasn't as big as a skyscraper.
Yeah, a lot easier to make small buildings and trenches fully destroyable
Good times, I remember getting battlefield 4 in 2014. My birthday is on January so I had to wait about 2 months
This is the best BF With Frostbite animation
That's an unfair comparison. You're shooting the one building in BF4 that was meant to fall. None of the other ones fall either.
I love how the large display screen on the building shower a Blue screen of death before shutting down🤩
I know bf2042 didn’t have like any destruction but you still should’ve showed the space station map instead because you can destroy the rocket on that map which is pretty cool. Too bad they didn’t bring more for the game 🫤
Send this to the battlefield team because we really need this
Scripted events big time don't count, also shooting anything but the pillars doesn't trigger it.
Okay mate, try the same thing on the rocket in BF2042. Or try the same thing on any other building in BF4 on that map ;)
It’s nuts how games seem to take like 10x100 steps back after a success or failure these days
Bad Company 2 still has the best destruction.
Very good 👍 wish we had a 3
The 2042 clip, it looks like a building you don’t even have access to, in bf4 that building was meant to fall and changes the points after.
In BF4 I was impressed when I first encountered it in multiplayer😮
Tbf that's one building, all buildings should've been like that
Remember the Crackdown 3 tech demo? That’s what we need
People don't understand, obviously in 2042 they made sure the buildings won't fall like in BF4, it would cost more to rebuild it again and again so they made it indestructible
They did battlefield dirty with this one
Destruction has been a key feature of the game, bring it back!
That was like the only destructible thing on all the maps though it's the only one I remember anyway
Bro seige of shanghai was my jam
I haven’t played 4 since it was in beta
The power and monitor screens should go out when you hit the towers ( this sort of realism adds immersion)
They don’t upgrade but downgrade the latest entry of the series
One time a guy flew us underneath that falling building & got us killed 😂
I always loved bf4 and online even my 60 years old father enjoys when he watch my play but now he passed away..
That man shooting the RPG accomplished nothing
BF4 was the last amazing BF there was
(in a modern setting)
Try doing that with literally any other skyscraper in BF4
Everyone's firing at the wrong points in bf4 like it does anything to help it fall down
And in COD Warzone a Twig is more Stable then a Car when you try ram it over
I've played BF4 on 3 different console's its just that good.
Just about every map had some sort of cool gimic that could turn the game around or just add some more immersion of the chaos of war. Absolutely love BF4.
The disappointment was on another level when nothing but small buildings was destructable
This is exactly what would get more people playing 2042 in my opinion
Shoot the Pillars breh masterpiece
I don't know why, but they seem so wholesome. Just everyone in the lobby teaming up to recreate 9-11
In Battlefield 4, you need to shoot at the BEAMS of the base of a Skyscraper
I always thought in real life if I shot artillery shells into the side of a building that it would just cause smoke and no damage
“It’s evolving just backwards”
I remember when that tower used to go down it was hell to take that flag
building like that wouldn't fall from a few rpgs
They should add bf4 maps in 2042 it would be dope af.
Levolution is not really the destruction that is in the game.