@@eac26114653 'Well-credentialed' means he must surely have hundreds of peer-reviewed academic publications under his belt, right? But he has only 5, and probably hasn't been published in over 30 yrs. Not a scientist. He's an evangelical Scientismatic.
Lot's of dumb people misinterpret what Weinstein is saying. He's saying Tyson knows physics and is excellent at explaining it. But he is not a practicing physicist in the sense that he's not doing research to push it's boundaries or solve unanswered questions. He's simply an expert on understanding and explaining the current body of knowledge.
I just saw him say "LEDs convert 100% of their energy into light" when typically 50-60% is lost to heat. Nothing being 100% efficient is a basic fact. He's also very closed-minded. Eric is correct here. When you see he often doesn't even listen and let someone finish sentences, there's no way he's going to break ground.
He's saying that Neil doesn't have the ability to do novel science, because he's incapable of thinking outside the box and resisting social pressures to pursue ideas.
NDT is the grown-up's version of Bill Nye. Fun to watch, can drop fun facts like no one's business, but he is not a knowledge creator. True scientists discover new truths and expand human knowledge. NDT's greatest accomplishment is that he "contributed" (did not lead) research that eventually led to Pluto being demoted as a planet decades ago. Yet, NDT is as famous as Einstein today because of social media and communication skills, which are useful in a narrow way to promoting science, but not doing science. I suppose science needs salespeople too.
@@jackfiercetree5205, hold on, you mean to tell me that you read that 'Jamie pull up the video...' joke and it made you laugh so hard that you were crying? 🤦♂️ you're either lying your ass off or you're 12 years old... it's one or the other
Do you know what a lawyer is? Someone who graduates law school Do you know what a doctor is? Someone who graduates medical school. Since Eric graduated Harvard in mathematical physics with a PhD, I’m pretty sure that qualifies him as a mathematical physicist.
The problem with science communicators is that they tend to be dogmatic and double down on their particular take while people doing scientific research have moved on. Richard Dawkins is one such communicator. His take on genes was quickly outdated, yet he never updated his book, for example.
Science propagandist. Who uses his celebrity to lend weight to his opinions on divisive societal issues that are far outside his area of supposed expertise. Opinions that just so happen to line up with his paymasters, much like Bill Nye's.
@@neddanison9202lolwut, wrong. Dawkins take on Genes? Fucking idiotic wording first of all, but Dawkins evolutionary dictations from all of his books to this day are the standard in Biology, the fucking standard, he also has admitted when certain things were wrong and changed them and rewrote entire notes to his books. All the things that you probably think Dawkins got wrong are highly contentious, unfleshed out ideas. I would love to hear just a single of example from you, you can even be vague and I will do the research, because you sir most likely have an ass derived comment.
@@VanMan83 what are you talking about, Genders are apart of science whether you think it is illness or he thinks it is not, it still exists, it is observable. The idea of genders is 100% confirmed in existence, political ideology aside. The fact that there are binary sexes also is scientifically false, there is no such thing as non binary, but there is XY, XX, XXY, X, XYY, and XXXY, the people who have these not so rare chromosonal disorders have nothing to do with gender, this is chromosomal sex. Bill Nye is a smart engineer and amazing science communicator and you are likely a lowly maggot in comparison.
@@RobertMJohnson he literally has a doctorate in astrophysics. They dont give that out to history teachers, they give that to people who can do physics.
@@audiofunkdialect Neil is a brilliant guy, no doubt. It's not about disagreements. When a scientist disregards scientific facts, they can no longer be considered such. He lost a lot of followers when speaking on gender fluidity. People can't be both genders because of how they feel on a given day. Crazy talk.
@@josephmango4628 dude I don’t understand transgender ideology I have no fucking clue I’m a straight male I don’t know what that feels like. I don’t know if all of them have legitimate feelings like that but I’m sure some people do we can be born with physical disfigurement you don’t think our brains can be a little off that probably is what is going on here. and I’m not trying to say they have mental in capacity. I’m saying that something like sexuality might be way different for some people you and I cannot put ourselves in their situation so I think it’s stupid to generalize in these situation.
Neil de grasse tyson has perfected the art of explaining science stuff in a way that most people can understand. Arguably the best explainer of all time.
Maybe one of the best science explainers in the US, although I find him too 'noisy and political, much prefer Michio Kaku. In UK, we have Jim Al Khalili and Brian Cox.
@@halley4032Kaku and tyson are the same. I do like Brian Cox though. And Brian Greene, Sean Carrol, and Leonard Susskind. Although Susskind isn't as prominent as everyone else here
@@Al-Storm they both always talk like they're selling something. I used to watch all these guys all the time but Tyson and Kaku just kind of got old to me
Arrogance ages you. Its the worse thing you can be specially if you are a scientist, if you think you know everything you stop taking different perspectives and that just ages your mind. Since you dont really receive any inputs from other people that could actually be beneficial to your own ideas.
You took a narrative and spinned it he’s saying Neil can’t take risk because if he’s wrong even once weirdos like you are gonna pull his card and say he never really was a scientist stop hating bro Shits bad vibes
@moonlion7047 I'm going to just acknowledge that everything you said is completely true without independent verification. Being smart in one field even being the best in that field, does not make you knowledgeable about all things and all fields. That seems to be his biggest problem
Sam please research a subject before doing a comment like that. I will assume you had no previous knowledge. These guys are not even close as far as IQ goes. We have had many now surpass even Einstein. It all depends what field these autistic geniuses have. As far as this goes Eric would disintegrate Neil.
Neil DeGrass Tyson is a pseudo-scientist at best. None of the colleagues on his level respect him or dignify him as being legitimate. And ABSOLUTELY NO FKING ONE respects or recognizes him on the actual scientific hierarchy, such as Eric.
Neil DeGrass Tyson is a pseudo-scientist at best. None of the colleagues on his level respect him or dignify him as being legitimate. And ABSOLUTELY NO FKING ONE respects or recognizes him on the actual scientific hierarchy, such as Eric.
If you think about it, Weinstein is saying every GREAT physicist has to think outside the box. That definition basically means the vast majority of physicists teaching physics, say, at universities (Who aren't breaking rules to test the boundaries of science) all fall under this category)! Strictly speaking, I believe that's true. Now, had Weinstein used this analogy, he would have made the same point without coming off as petty or jealous towards an individual... but for some reason he felt he had to single out NDT to make his point. Sorry, but that says more about Weinstein than NDT.
@@missionpupa Weinstein has a PhD from Harvard in Physics who makes a living directing hedge funds and running a podcast. So he's not even a physicist. Your deflection at me was idiotic because I KNOW I'm not as smart as these guys, and openly admit it! Maybe you don't know what the word "jealous" actually means...
@@Finians_Mancaveme too felt he is jealous of NDT. NDT has given me great knowledge in physics. He makes it easy for the layman to understand basic physics. And his excitement is contagious. Of course others in the scienctific community not as popular or successful will be jealous. As he is a very good orator. NDT is not that revolutionary out of the box scientist. So what, his videos are good for me.
@@drmantistoboggan2870Everything outside of his specialty. For example, he’s ignorant of the most simple biological facts about the differences between men and women. I’ve noticed that many scientists speak with overconfidence about topics outside of their specialty. Usually philosophical topics, like the existence of objective morality or that of God.
@@jordyb57 yeah not exactly the same lol. I was more thinking if that scientist had followed the procedures to a T and cleaned up like a good little scientist should then penicillin would not have been discovered at that time.
LOL Neither is Weinstein. Take a brief tour of what the 'practicing physicist' community has to say about Eric's theory of 'Geometric Unity.' Given the topic of Weinstein's critique - why would anybody seek out a (yet another) non practicing presenter for substantiation of the viewpoint?
@@Create-The-Imaginable yet check among the both who published and co assited research papers lol. Neil doesnt even have the time Eric does in terms of always trying to educate the public. People are really ungrateful
Eric, "Neil is not a physicist at a practicing level..." Joe, "Are you a scientist at a practicing level..." Eric, "No, but in my defense, I must say that I'm a borderline quack, but about you, Joe?" Joe, "I can quack like a duck. That sh^t is tough, man"
Neil is a great orator.... and probably a mediocre astrophysicist....he would probably be a great astrophysicist teacher, but he basically got everything else wrong coz he doesn't do his homework and tries to be a politician. He got global warming wrong. That's just bullocks All Gore politics w/o any scientific backing.... he then got the vaccine stuff wrong, like almost everything of it and then he went Bill Nye the not so science guy lunatic by trying to justify the woke mental illness about what is a woman. Among many other things btw... I did had respect for him about 15 years ago... meanwhile he lost all of it.
If I said "I met a man the other day, cool dude, I'll bring him to the next guys' poker night" and the man who shows up looks, acts, and sounds exactly like Megan Fox, would you feel misled?
I studied astrophysics under Neil and briefly worked for him at AMNH. This is accurate, but this was Neil's very calculated choice (he made a decision to walk a straight line in science, and he's done that well). Neil knew his strengths and played to those strengths. He is not a physicist or researcher.
@Dylan-gb4ju You wasted what little time you have left to live researching and insulting someone who will never respect or like you, only to be 100% wrong about everything you've assumed (as usual). This is precisely why you're struggling to find true happiness. Trolling is for losers. Step up your game before it's too late. Sincerely, "These Bots"
Bill nye never said he was a scientist he is a science communicators and a very good one. The idea was that anyone can do science you haters are missing the whole point. Gonna tell me carl Sagan wasn’t a practicing scientists Because he wrote books and did a tv show. NDT is a physicist he had a PhD and he did his thesis.
@@JamesHeller-if5kg you don’t have to little bro. I choose to bc i believe that’s the right way to treat people but there are a lot of ways to live this life. None of them include telling other people what they do is wrong.
Weinstein, though obviously a very smart guy, strikes me as one of those guys who made a ton of money in business, and retroactively ascribed it to purely to his intellectual superiority, which in turn only bloats his intellectual ego.
Well, think about it! It’s counterintuitive. Why close your eyes when it’s already dark out? Is it the darkness that makes us sleep? Yes and no. Ever sleep on a nice afternoon under the sun. It’s not the darkness that causes us to sleep, it’s because you’re tired. Okay so what, does that have to with closing your eyes? Well, you’re tired so you don’t want to move your eyelid muscles. No. Eyelids are pretty light. You see, there was this guy in the nineteen eighties who figured this out and you wanna know why you close your eyes at night? Dust. He did one of those clock work orange machines on people and they all slept. Regular dreams like people always have. However, in the morning everyone had pain in their eyes and saw a bunch of little specks. You know how sometimes you see little specks in your eyes? Those are dead skin cells from your eyes. He figures out that those are the same thing, on they’re coming from the air around us. That’s what dust is! Dead skin! You close your eyes because of dead skin, Joe!
I just listened to a Startalk that NDT was asked what he be doing if he wasn’t an astrophysicist. And he said that would still be a astrophysicist but one who spent all his time in a lab. He is self aware that he has a special talent for teaching and getting people interested in science, more so than just being a great physicist.
@PETERJOHN101 He is pretty good when he is talking alone. If there are more than one person, like a 1v1 interview, or even a panel, then I agree completely. If he is giving more of a lecture or talk, then he's fine, and can even be enjoyable to listen to.
Feynman was also a practising physicist, who helped develop quantum electrodynamics and the least action principle. NDT is a brilliant guy, but doesn't actually carry out any physics research. He is purely a communicator of science. It's not an insult, since they ultimately help inspire the next generation of physicists.
Feynman, who is one of the very few people that have radically shaped my thinking on various matters even though I'm of a different culture (I'm an Indian) especially when I myself was aspiring to be a physicist (now a comp sci engineer), was a special personality in terms of communication , pedagogy and actual practice in and even around his field like investigating Space Shuttle Challenger accident. There is no comparison with NDT.
These are all gatekeepers. Advancement in physics has been stifled because of their lies. Vortex Mechanics were replacing wave mechanics in German textbooks before WW2. Eddington 1919 was debunked by Charles Poor in 1930. Einstein admitted Dayton Miller disproved Special Relativity in 1925! None of these people are telling the true history of scientific suppression in the name of state secrecy.
Neil Degrasse Tyson is a great storyteller. He has my respect for that, for explaining rather complicated subjects with analogies and simple words, and by doing so he's been inspiring and influencing future great minds to pursue their dreams in science matters. ❤
Part of his education was at Columbia and Columbia for a long time, was the hot bed of CIA undercover education. Though, that has shifted some to John Hopkins in more recent times, because Columbia got called out on it.
@rookiegirl5757 The more popular version is "wakes his family up to tell them he's going to sleep." After careful consideration, I do think that's more applicable to his discourse and, therefore, funnier.
Neil is a Harvard grad in Physics, with a PHD in Astrophysics from Columbia also having postdoctoral research from Princeton. That is DOCTOR Neil De grasse Tyson 🤓 let’s not take that away from him!
Like you said, he's an astrophysicist. Like Weinstein said, which doesn't take away anything from Tyson, he isn't a practicing physicist. Weinstein, on the other hand, has made contributions to physics that far outweigh anything the talking head, Tyson, has.
@@joshtaylor6038 You are exaggerating. Weinstein has proposed *one* theory that he hasn't yet published in full for peer review. A *draft* of the paper was released with this interview and it has already been criticized as being full of "gaps" that jeopardize the whole of the proposed theory. At this point, he hasn't really contributed much. NDT has authored or co-authored MANY papers in his career.
Good point! He has participated in research, and I think he could again if he wanted to. Sort of irresponsible to pigeon-hole someone like he is doing. All it takes for this to be made untrue is for Neil to sit down and start researching a new topic. I am not even sure it is broadly true now considering the points you've brought up. He is kind of saying that the only true physicists are those who are participating in the frontiers of physics: quantum gravity, dark matter...etc. The fact that none of the physics is confirmed yet and that publications are possible without experimental confirmation, for me, could even be used as a converse argument to what he is saying. The mark of a real physicist is that they research physics that isn't yet real. What a twist of logic!
@@nothingnewhere6551 Exactly, you have to participate in research and have it accepted and published via peer reviews to have the title Tyson has. This guy's a bozo.
@@hxhdfjifzirstc894They shouldn't care anyways. This idea that linguists, physicists, or scientists in general have any authority on matters outside their field or neighboring fields is nonsense and just modern idolatry filling the hole left by religion. Philosophers themselves have no actual authority or related experience to topics such as politics. Neither do "political scientists/philosophers", ironically. I'd trust the average person's opinion much more on commentary and proposed solutions to every day problems than some isolated academic. I also guarantee you, if you ran a study comparing the effectiveness of certain groups at making meaningful improvements to general society through governing, the condition that someone has attained a higher educational degree at best shows no correlation, and likely correlates highly negatively. This should be intuitive due to this condition correlating to an extreme divergence in lifestyle and experiences from the common person. The Soviet Union is what you get when scholars and scientists attempt to form a new governmental system from scratch. A broken, overly idealistic, and poorly executed set of fundamental ideas for a society, dressed up as a utopia, that isn't efficient at doing anything important to the common man but, obviously, extremely efficient at academic pursuits, which inevitably descends into authoritarian autocracy the moment the people realize that their smart leaders will never prioritize anything but their own interests. The irony of the Soviet Union proclaiming itself as a "government of the workers", is likely the greatest in all of history. There were many founding fathers that were scholars, but their ranks were filled primarily by somewhat intellectually homely people. The ratios of these groups helped renormalize and transform the academic's idealistic fantasies into effective governmental systems for the general populace, at least to a more sufficient extent than the other systems of the time. Even then, some detrimental idealisms still made it through the filter, and it took literal centuries for them to be removed. With their existence and uprooting nearly always causing mass upheaval and suffering in the common man's life. The best example of this includes such wonderful ideas as slavery (yes, this was primarily supported and practiced by the rich intellectuals like Jefferson), which caused the bloodiest conflict in the nation's history. Remember, even Lincoln, a highly educated Lawyer, didn't want to free the slaves because he thought they were equal, he wanted to free them because he saw the existence of slavery as incompatible with the ideas and future of America. He expressed several times that he thought blacks could not exist in American society, and that it would be necessary to relocate them back to Africa.
I dont think it helps you to say he willfully ignorant or something akin to a easy to fix human flaw of arrogance, the guy is a stereotypical savant genius with less processing dedicated to mastrubation
Neil DeGrasse Tyson would have been one of the many scientists to deny general relativity when it first came out. Neil is incredibly intelligent, but he’s a hardcore conformist. This prevents him from being unique, and creative.
Knowledgeable and Intelligent are two different things. You can know everything in a text book which makes you as knowledgeable as that text book. If you don’t understand how to apply that knowledge, you’re not very intelligent.
Nah, you don't know how the GR model was created. Before of that you had the model of Special Relativity which solved MANY problems in physics (most of which were already proven to be truth) The thing was already in the air, so it was accepted easily. GR is a generalization of that, so Einstein's reputation was already established by the time he published his paper (there were more people trying to find that generalization) So... even conformist scientists accepted GR rather fast.
My takeaway from this interview was his attitude of "I'm the man with all the answers." His argument was a challenge to the status quo, but don't mistake that for being correct or absolute.
😂 Carl Sagan was awesome IMO I don't remember him being as obnoxious as NDT or even arrogant at all but maybe I only watched him narrate and not his real self.
@@piggyslayer1999 What’s worse, when I argued with the zealots who regurgitated that line, they would send me academic papers that used words like “suggests” and “leads us to believe” in the summaries. Religion is never the problem. Zealotry is the problem, and religion isn’t the only ideology that has mindless zealots.
Tyson is the head of the Hayden Planetarium, he is first and foremost a communicator. Someone whos job it is to help the public become interested in science through television and other means. And I cant think of anyone else in the modern era who has done more for the advancement of science in the public sphere than NDT. So his impact on the world is probably inspiring tons of people to follow a path into the science industries, definitely more so than this guy. Except, Tyson is someone who doesnt go out and trash his colleagues like this guy.
DeGrasse Tyson taught astrophysics at university level and researched it at post-doc level. You're a clown who doesn't know what they're talking about.
@TwilightxKnight13 Obviously, you can't tell the difference between education and true intelligence, Neil has been educating himself for many, many years, yet true still remains elusive to the poor old bugger. If you had any intelligent's you'd know this and refrain from such Neanderthal statements. 🤣 🤣 🤣
@TwilightxKnight13 Well, at least I can actually spell MacDonalds, and if you even had half a brain, you would realise I'm right. Having an education and being intelligent Are two totally different things. And by the sounds of it you lack both. 🤣
Neil is like a goated NBA commentator, he understands the game inside and out but he can’t necessarily play at that level. It doesn’t make him any less their jobs are just different. The quacks that reinvent science aren’t gonna go give talks to the public all the time lol
Scientists doing the research are sometimes like computer techies -- they can't explain stuff in simple English. So we need people like NDT to communicate to us. A valuable function.
YOU ARE CORRECT, SIR!!! Like the Tour Guide at Alcatraz. I don't need understand the Justice System.... Just explain what it was like to be there.... Tyson may not be a great 'CHEF' but he knows how to cook.
Bill nye is the worst. He has no idea what he’s talking about. Is a politician who’s gotten all his statements refuted over the years. I enjoyed watching his stuff when I was 5 though. But he’s lost his mind lately.
You can make a point without hating on someone else ,sounds like hating. Make your point through your own accolades and those who find interest will come. Hater alert
On April 1, 2021, Weinstein released a draft paper on Geometric Unity in a guest appearance on the podcast The Joe Rogan Experience. Weinstein qualified in his paper that he "is not a physicist," but an "entertainer" and podcast host. It received strong criticism from some in the scientific community. Timothy Nguyen, whose PhD thesis intersects with Weinstein's work[b] said what Weinstein has presented so far has had "no visible impact" and "gaps, both mathematical and physical in origin" that "jeopardize Geometric Unity as a well-defined theory, much less one that is a candidate for a theory of everything."
We have them. They're the kind of people without a big ego, so you don't hear about them. But they have a ton of good quality research publications. Unfortunately they're getting pushed out as science becomes increasingly corrupted by money and politics.
One of the best things about the scientific method is that any “irresponsibility” within any research usually has to go through a peer review process, which usually checks down irresponsibilities, or any flaws that may be happening within any research. Neil may not be a great physician/scientist in terms of introducing new ideas or “being irresponsible”, but he is great at communicating and promoting those ideas by making them more accessible to the rest of us instead of claiming bogus conspiracies
Neil abuses his deep voice. He can go deeper than anyone, and so seems more authoritative. One uses that sparingly, when really important, but he uses that often, and especially when losing an argument.
What are 95-99% of scientists... that is the point Eric is making.... they sit in Ivory towers, philating each other's dogma within "the science" TM . It's ok, there is knowledge being created, but so slowly to make real progress. NDT is a GREAT storyteller of science and has a library at the tip of his tongue to wax on so well... the entertainment is worth the admission.
Here are 25 differential algebraists who do differential algebra. All of them super-geniuses in their own field. Carlos Arreche, Rick Churchill, Thomas Dreyfus, Victor Edneral, Sebastian Falkensteiner, Li Guo, Neil Hwang, Antonino Iannazzo, Partha Kumbhakar, Yunnan Li, Andy Magid, Ronnie Nagloo, Alexey Ovchinnikov, Dmitrii Pavlov, Daniel Robertz, Valerij Romanovskij, Chitrarekha Sahu, Eberhard Schruefer, Matthias Seiss, William Sit, Ivan Tomasic, Jorge Vargas, Michael Wibmer, Sihong Wu, Brian Wynne
Timothy Nguyen, whose PhD thesis intersects with Weinstein's work said what Weinstein has presented so far has had "no visible impact" and "gaps, both mathematical and physical in origin" that "jeopardize Geometric Unity as a well-defined theory, much less one that is a candidate for a theory of everything."
My money for a TOE goes to Wolfram, the way that his generative algorithm combined with graph theory leads to the duality of quantum physics is very elegant.
NGT is an educator, and he does a damn fine job of it. I’ve seen many physicists doing the research who have a hard time communicating to layman the basic principles of their work.
Eric _is_ a quack. He tried publishing a paper called "Geometric Unity" that was supposed to be a Theory of Everything, but it's ridiculous and got roasted by the scientific community. I wouldn't listen to a word he says.
Or to put Eric’s logic here another way: “I’m a irresponsible borderline quack, under my definition I’m a ‘great scientist’ because I do bad science. Furthermore anyone who criticises my ideas isn’t ready to do ‘great science’ because the doom themselves to do ‘good science’. This is exactly because they’re not an irresponsible borderline quack.
@@gvngbvngiggy no, this guy is a hack and an incredibly arrogant person. He goes around claiming to have solved unified theory, to call everyone else stupid and , much like his brother, lacks academic rigour to say the least. So when he talks about Physics and puts people down I get upset at it - especially given he is nothing more than a grubby hedge fund manager - working with Peter Tiel.
@@gvngbvngiggy I don't have anything really against Eric Weinstein, but he is just a master at making himself sound ever so wise and mysterious and especially in saying things that will keep getting him invited on popular podcasts and shows. He is VERY bombastic and grandiose in his speech, but weirdly, nothing he ever says or claims has the grandiosity he ascribes to it. Like "the most scary human being" that's just some mathematician or his newest tale of saying that never in his life met a person that was so clearly a construction like Jeffrey Eppstein and backing it up with the most ridiculous claim that he never met someone less likely to take their life as Jeffrey Epstein. Sorry to bring the whole Epstein thing into it, but NOTHING about Weinstein's hypothesis has a shred of tangible evidence, nevermind the fact that Epstein clearly had means, motive and opportunity to end himself, with extreme emphasis on motive, being a severe case of covert grandiose narcissistic personality disorder who went from philanthropist billionaire to be known worldwide as a pedophile and having no chance to get out of incarceration. Narcissistic personality disorder has the highest suicide rate and the two most important things for a narcissist are reputation and being in control. Anyways, Eric Weinstein is literally a poser, change my mind.
Although Neil is not a practicing scientist per se, he's a great science communicator, it's good for people especially younger people to get into science.
Finally it gets said out loud. He’s a guy who wears makeup and reads lines for a camera. Like some actors do comedy’s and some do dramas, NDT reads words about sciencey like stuff.
To people not understanding. “Tyson understands and can articulate what we know as physics is very well, but he does not have the ability to think outside of what he knows”
NGL’s Credentials: - Bachelors of Physics - Harvard (1980) - Masters of Astronomy - University of Texas (1989) - P.hD. in Astrophysics - Columbia (1991) - Postdoctoral Research Associate - Princeton (1991-1994) - Staff Scientist - Hayden Planetarium (1994) - Visiting Research Scientist & Lecturer (Faculty) - Princeton (1994) - Director of The Planetarium (1996-2000) No Eric Weinstein, NGL IS A PHYSICIST; an Astrophysicist Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson
"...at a practicing level" is what he said. Essentially, he's a celebrity and too worried about his celebrity and image to go into unexplored territory. A fear of 'looking dumb' or 'crazy', he won't break any new ground. Instead he sits on Twitter and explains why something that happened in a movie wasn't physically accurate. Flexing degrees doesn't tell the story of a person. Eric gave him credit for intelligence. But he won't explore and advance the field.
@ultrameticulous when did he say he was worried about going into unexplored territory?? What are you even talking about. No one expects Tyson to be in some NASA lab doing some nerdy experiments. Discoveries are no longer done by individuals.
@@Mastikatorhe left physics behind long time ago. He has never published anything perr reviewed. He now promotes women with penises competing in weight lifting against actual women. Give your head a shake. Try not being deliberately stupid.
Someone need to ask this man with what he have a problem or with what he dont have problem because he always find some problem in someone and never in him self...
If I am wrong about a concept, I want people to point it out to me. Then, I can strive to be better and know the truth. We now have to dress up criticism as people are so thin-skinned. Terrence Howard does not know simple arithmetic. We should just tell him straight that he is wrong.
Perry you shouldn't spread misinformation... Plowing a potato field in 1920, a 14-year-old farm boy from Idaho saw in the parallel rows of overturned earth a way to “make pictures fly through the air.” This boy was not a magician; he was a scientific genius and just eight years later he made his brainstorm in the potato field a reality by transmitting the world’s first television image. Philo Farnsworth, a visionary genius. It was the parallel lines of information.
@@Dave_of_Mordoryes, not an expert but have always had a desire to learn and enjoyed science. A lot of changes since my advanced biology in high school(1976) and dental school (1984) I still fascinated with current information I get from reputable podcasters
I am not sure who these Wienstien brothers are but I have never really understood why they are given the same crediblity as sam harris and other intellectual atheist. He seemed to critize a lot and offer very little.
@@jelink22Having money just makes the ego bigger and the jealousy bigger. He’s full of resentment over the physics establishment and he can’t get over it.
@allobove7798 The definition of a woman has become a socio-political issue. It is a way to box people. Anyone who is asking questions about the obvious may have an ulterior motive. Caveat.
@@allobove7798 Obviously, the definition of a woman in today's world has become ambiguous and political. It is no longer a matter of fact but a matter of beliefs.
So, you're saying that people who criticise public commenters are "haters"? How hopelessly lame. There--I criticized you. does that mean I hate you? SNORT
Neil is a great science communicator, so what if he hasn't done groundbreaking research. Trying to discredit him this way as a way to discredit his scientific opinions on matters is wrong. Neil amplifies the scientific consensus, which is dictated by groundbreaking research and thousands of more reputable researchers than Weinstein.
Weisntein never tried to discredit Neil's scientific expertise in this clip. He was just trying to explain the differences between a science communicator and a scientific researcher and he is right, those two are very different things and very few people can be both at once (at a high level). Pls stop being so insecure and emotionally attached to a multimillionaire who doesn't even know you exist. Take your emotions and biases out of it and watch this clip again from a level headed and rational point of view, you would very soon realize that at no point in the video weinstein is actually disrespecting neil. what he's saying is just basic common sense and I'm sure even neil himself would agree with weinstein on this. The fact that you got so triggered and offended by something so obvious and simple is honestly so sad and pathetic. pls look at yourself in the mirror and realize your wrongs before it's too late because people like you who are so emotionally attached when viewing and discussing an intellectual topic are the most susceptible ones to going down the conspiracy/unscientific thinking route. I'd recommend you to go to a therapist in order to address this because alot of deep insecurity issues might be the root cause of this kinda behavior.
![Six Hundred Strike [EPIC: The Musical] Full Animatic](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zov6NXIAuow/mqdefault.jpg)
JRE: "The Role of Intuition and Quackery in Scientific Discovery" 👉 ruclips.net/video/o2upzS5K0Bg/видео.html
Weinstein proving he is a fool once again.
@@Gays4Trumpboo hoo!
@@geemanbmw did he cry? He is a huge 🐈!
Tyson has his bachelors (Harvard), masters (Univ of Texas), and Ph.D. (Columbia). He is well-credentialed to be considered a "scientist".
@@eac26114653 'Well-credentialed' means he must surely have hundreds of peer-reviewed academic publications under his belt, right? But he has only 5, and probably hasn't been published in over 30 yrs.
Not a scientist. He's an evangelical Scientismatic.
Lot's of dumb people misinterpret what Weinstein is saying. He's saying Tyson knows physics and is excellent at explaining it. But he is not a practicing physicist in the sense that he's not doing research to push it's boundaries or solve unanswered questions. He's simply an expert on understanding and explaining the current body of knowledge.
I just saw him say "LEDs convert 100% of their energy into light" when typically 50-60% is lost to heat. Nothing being 100% efficient is a basic fact. He's also very closed-minded. Eric is correct here. When you see he often doesn't even listen and let someone finish sentences, there's no way he's going to break ground.
He's saying that Neil doesn't have the ability to do novel science, because he's incapable of thinking outside the box and resisting social pressures to pursue ideas.
@@spracketskooch Exactly..
NDT is the grown-up's version of Bill Nye. Fun to watch, can drop fun facts like no one's business, but he is not a knowledge creator. True scientists discover new truths and expand human knowledge. NDT's greatest accomplishment is that he "contributed" (did not lead) research that eventually led to Pluto being demoted as a planet decades ago. Yet, NDT is as famous as Einstein today because of social media and communication skills, which are useful in a narrow way to promoting science, but not doing science. I suppose science needs salespeople too.
Yeah, sure.
I always thought Neil Degrasse Tyson was an actor portraying an astrophysicist
Like bill nye
Same
basically, he is. he's too arrogant to be worthy of my attention because arrogance gets it wrong more often
Fk him, he's way too defensive for casual conversations.
No. You're thinking of that lad from Big Bang Theory.
"Jamie, pull up that video of a bear doing borderline science"
man… this jokes a little played out now…
It got 154 likes in 2023 😂
Incredible
😂
@ghijbvhiigvh3940 but this is one of the best ones. I have read... SoOoo Many and this is the first time I cried laughing.
@@jackfiercetree5205, hold on, you mean to tell me that you read that 'Jamie pull up the video...' joke and it made you laugh so hard that you were crying? 🤦♂️ you're either lying your ass off or you're 12 years old... it's one or the other
Eric is also not a practicing physicist. From what I read he’s been in finance for the past 20 years or so.
Which uses physics and PhD level mathematics ya uneducated Jack Cass
He's a mathematician, never been a physicist.
Do you know what a lawyer is? Someone who graduates law school
Do you know what a doctor is? Someone who graduates medical school.
Since Eric graduated Harvard in mathematical physics with a PhD, I’m pretty sure that qualifies him as a mathematical physicist.
@@RobertMJohnson the word ‘practicing’ here is important.
@@aaronbailey23you clearly don’t know what doctors do whilst in medical school, do you?
“If at first the idea isn’t absurd, then there is no hope for it.” - Albert Einstein
I want to breathe in outer space without equipment. I guess there’s hope for it
@@theclockmax Bahahahaha Bahahahaha Okden lol!!! 😳🤣🤣😆🤯😆🤣🤣😂😆😅
"When walking on eggshells; it's best done with bare feet." - Sir Isaac Newton.
gonna pull that one on hot nerdy girls.
@@theclockmaxprobably possible, we just don’t know how yet.
Neil is what he says he is: A Science Communicator.
The problem with science communicators is that they tend to be dogmatic and double down on their particular take while people doing scientific research have moved on. Richard Dawkins is one such communicator. His take on genes was quickly outdated, yet he never updated his book, for example.
Science propagandist. Who uses his celebrity to lend weight to his opinions on divisive societal issues that are far outside his area of supposed expertise. Opinions that just so happen to line up with his paymasters, much like Bill Nye's.
@@neddanison9202lolwut, wrong. Dawkins take on Genes? Fucking idiotic wording first of all, but Dawkins evolutionary dictations from all of his books to this day are the standard in Biology, the fucking standard, he also has admitted when certain things were wrong and changed them and rewrote entire notes to his books. All the things that you probably think Dawkins got wrong are highly contentious, unfleshed out ideas. I would love to hear just a single of example from you, you can even be vague and I will do the research, because you sir most likely have an ass derived comment.
@@VanMan83 what are you talking about, Genders are apart of science whether you think it is illness or he thinks it is not, it still exists, it is observable. The idea of genders is 100% confirmed in existence, political ideology aside. The fact that there are binary sexes also is scientifically false, there is no such thing as non binary, but there is XY, XX, XXY, X, XYY, and XXXY, the people who have these not so rare chromosonal disorders have nothing to do with gender, this is chromosomal sex. Bill Nye is a smart engineer and amazing science communicator and you are likely a lowly maggot in comparison.
@@VanMan83I mean there's been some discoveries regarding xy chromosomes and intersex people that kind of changed our perspectives on gender identity
I was waiting for NDT to jump in and interrupt
😅😅😅😅😅
IF YOU VALUE MOUNTAIN CLIMBING...
But but in Harry Potter
In Russia we call people like Neil a "science-pop author" and it's not a very high honor.
Good bc Neil is an historian not a scientist
How you say that in Russian?
@@stanleygray7402 the movement is called "научпоп"(from "научно-популярный") and a person doing is a "научпопер"
@@RobertMJohnson he literally has a doctorate in astrophysics. They dont give that out to history teachers, they give that to people who can do physics.
@@missionpupayou and I both know
1. You haven’t done your homework on Neil
2. Don’t know what astrophysics is compared to physics.
3. Are a racist.
When he caved on the gender issue, he lost all my respect.
So you like him cancelled?
@@kogiman when you ignore science as a scientist, you cancel yourself.
So when you disagree with somebody on something you lose all respect for them in your personal life, do you do that?
@@audiofunkdialect Neil is a brilliant guy, no doubt. It's not about disagreements. When a scientist disregards scientific facts, they can no longer be considered such. He lost a lot of followers when speaking on gender fluidity. People can't be both genders because of how they feel on a given day. Crazy talk.
@@josephmango4628 dude I don’t understand transgender ideology I have no fucking clue I’m a straight male I don’t know what that feels like. I don’t know if all of them have legitimate feelings like that but I’m sure some people do we can be born with physical disfigurement you don’t think our brains can be a little off that probably is what is going on here. and I’m not trying to say they have mental in capacity. I’m saying that something like sexuality might be way different for some people you and I cannot put ourselves in their situation so I think it’s stupid to generalize in these situation.
Neil de grasse tyson has perfected the art of explaining science stuff in a way that most people can understand. Arguably the best explainer of all time.
Maybe one of the best science explainers in the US, although I find him too 'noisy and political, much prefer Michio Kaku. In UK, we have Jim Al Khalili and Brian Cox.
@@halley4032Kaku and tyson are the same. I do like Brian Cox though. And Brian Greene, Sean Carrol, and Leonard Susskind. Although Susskind isn't as prominent as everyone else here
@@ItsGamingFancyThey aren't the same. Tyson is argumentative, constantly interrupts people, and talks down to people. Kaku does none of that.
@@Al-Storm they both always talk like they're selling something. I used to watch all these guys all the time but Tyson and Kaku just kind of got old to me
Nope he is just another cheer leader who didn't see any other way to make a living.
It's his ego that hurts him.
Arrogance ages you. Its the worse thing you can be specially if you are a scientist, if you think you know everything you stop taking different perspectives and that just ages your mind. Since you dont really receive any inputs from other people that could actually be beneficial to your own ideas.
He wasnt always the way he is now. The more famous he got, the more his arrogance came to the forefront of his persona.
He is NOT a practicing scientist.
An actual practicing scientist can entertain multiple possibilities at once.
You took a narrative and spinned it he’s saying Neil can’t take risk because if he’s wrong even once weirdos like you are gonna pull his card and say he never really was a scientist stop hating bro Shits bad vibes
@@Robertmartines I don't think you need to have multiple personality to be a scientist xD. In fact, i think it's the other way around...
Eric Weinstein criticizing someone else for being fake is a bold move
I think his 'borderline quaks' comment was about himself. 😂
@moonlion7047 I'm going to just acknowledge that everything you said is completely true without independent verification. Being smart in one field even being the best in that field, does not make you knowledgeable about all things and all fields. That seems to be his biggest problem
Sam please research a subject before doing a comment like that. I will assume you had no previous knowledge. These guys are not even close as far as IQ goes. We have had many now surpass even Einstein. It all depends what field these autistic geniuses have. As far as this goes Eric would disintegrate Neil.
Neil DeGrass Tyson is a pseudo-scientist at best. None of the colleagues on his level respect him or dignify him as being legitimate. And ABSOLUTELY NO FKING ONE respects or recognizes him on the actual scientific hierarchy, such as Eric.
Neil DeGrass Tyson is a pseudo-scientist at best. None of the colleagues on his level respect him or dignify him as being legitimate. And ABSOLUTELY NO FKING ONE respects or recognizes him on the actual scientific hierarchy, such as Eric.
he's not ready to think.
that's brutal
If you think about it, Weinstein is saying every GREAT physicist has to think outside the box. That definition basically means the vast majority of physicists teaching physics, say, at universities (Who aren't breaking rules to test the boundaries of science) all fall under
this category)! Strictly speaking, I believe that's true. Now, had Weinstein used this analogy, he would have made the same point without coming off as petty or jealous towards an individual... but for some reason he felt he had to single out NDT to make his point. Sorry, but that says more about Weinstein than NDT.
@@Finians_Mancavehe stated a fact pretty objectively. I think you're the jealous one here in Weinstein, it says more about you really.
@@missionpupa Weinstein has a PhD from Harvard in Physics who makes a living directing hedge funds and running a podcast. So he's not even a physicist. Your deflection at me was idiotic because I KNOW I'm not as smart as these guys, and openly admit it! Maybe you don't know what the word "jealous" actually means...
@@Finians_Mancaveme too felt he is jealous of NDT. NDT has given me great knowledge in physics. He makes it easy for the layman to understand basic physics. And his excitement is contagious. Of course others in the scienctific community not as popular or successful will be jealous. As he is a very good orator.
NDT is not that revolutionary out of the box scientist. So what, his videos are good for me.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s only problems are his arrogance, his manner, his ego and his ignorance
First 3 are accurate but whats he ignorant of?
@@drmantistoboggan2870 of these three things of his
So, other than that, he's great, right? Lol
@drmantistoboggan2870 his views on religion are ignorant and reddit tier cringe and shows a complete lack of history
@@drmantistoboggan2870Everything outside of his specialty. For example, he’s ignorant of the most simple biological facts about the differences between men and women.
I’ve noticed that many scientists speak with overconfidence about topics outside of their specialty. Usually philosophical topics, like the existence of objective morality or that of God.
Penicillin was discovered because a sloppy scientists refused to clean out his old agar plates.
That’s not what he meant but true lol
@@jordyb57 yeah not exactly the same lol. I was more thinking if that scientist had followed the procedures to a T and cleaned up like a good little scientist should then penicillin would not have been discovered at that time.
Not unlike LSD
hate to burst your bubble but we( the whole wide world) knew this by 1st grade.
@@edwardwright2989 this is an unfounded lie that only a moron would utter.
LOL
Neither is Weinstein.
Take a brief tour of what the 'practicing physicist' community has to say about Eric's theory of 'Geometric Unity.'
Given the topic of Weinstein's critique - why would anybody seek out a (yet another) non practicing presenter for substantiation of the viewpoint?
But Weinstein is more adventurous and takes risks that Neil will not!
@@Create-The-Imaginable yet check among the both who published and co assited research papers lol. Neil doesnt even have the time Eric does in terms of always trying to educate the public. People are really ungrateful
Eric is a boor
Eric, "Neil is not a physicist at a practicing level..."
Joe, "Are you a scientist at a practicing level..."
Eric, "No, but in my defense, I must say that I'm a borderline quack, but about you, Joe?"
Joe, "I can quack like a duck. That sh^t is tough, man"
😂😂😂
Perfect summary 👌
Neil is a token, period.
Haha
But is he wrong about anything? No? Then STFU lol
Neil doesn't even know what a woman is lol.
Neil is a great orator.... and probably a mediocre astrophysicist....he would probably be a great astrophysicist teacher, but he basically got everything else wrong coz he doesn't do his homework and tries to be a politician. He got global warming wrong. That's just bullocks All Gore politics w/o any scientific backing.... he then got the vaccine stuff wrong, like almost everything of it and then he went Bill Nye the not so science guy lunatic by trying to justify the woke mental illness about what is a woman. Among many other things btw... I did had respect for him about 15 years ago... meanwhile he lost all of it.
You mean he is willing to think outside of the scientific orthodoxy box?
@@beatonthedonis “earth is flat” I’m a genius that thinks outside of scientific orthodoxy 🤗
@cjaydustie1867 so stunning and brave!
Yeah he does.
Neil doesn't know what a woman is
He's married doofus.
If I said "I met a man the other day, cool dude, I'll bring him to the next guys' poker night" and the man who shows up looks, acts, and sounds exactly like Megan Fox, would you feel misled?
@@credman Not if it had a wee wee
@@sirhenrystalwart8303Not even 1% surprised or misled. Thanks for letting us know you don't even believe what you're saying.
@@credman That's a loaded question. Are their shorts loaded with something extra, or not? Either way, yeah - a bit misled.
I studied astrophysics under Neil and briefly worked for him at AMNH. This is accurate, but this was Neil's very calculated choice (he made a decision to walk a straight line in science, and he's done that well). Neil knew his strengths and played to those strengths. He is not a physicist or researcher.
Very well put
No you didn’t. I already background checked you and you didn’t even study astrophysics or go to AMNH. God I swear these bots will lie about anything.
@Dylan-gb4ju You wasted what little time you have left to live researching and insulting someone who will never respect or like you, only to be 100% wrong about everything you've assumed (as usual). This is precisely why you're struggling to find true happiness. Trolling is for losers. Step up your game before it's too late.
Sincerely,
"These Bots"
@@AcademicsGamingDude check out her grammar, she's clearly educated by the way she just fucking cooked you
He's a TV personality. He's not smart enough to do real research.
Neil is just 2023's version of Bill Nye.
He has a PhD, you have no idea what your talking about
Bill nye never said he was a scientist he is a science communicators and a very good one. The idea was that anyone can do science you haters are missing the whole point. Gonna tell me carl Sagan wasn’t a practicing scientists Because he wrote books and did a tv show. NDT is a physicist he had a PhD and he did his thesis.
@@holyguy2940 Jill Biden has a PhD, too, meaning in your world that she's as smart as Neil.
Are you 2023's version of anybody?
nope
Me trying to convince my wife any of my ideas are good “the best scientists were all boarderline quacks”
The only way to convince a wife is to divorce them or trick them into thinking it was her idea 😂
We give women wsy too much say in life
@@JamesHeller-if5kg😂😂😂😂😂
But the implication dont go both ways
@@JamesHeller-if5kg you don’t have to little bro. I choose to bc i believe that’s the right way to treat people but there are a lot of ways to live this life. None of them include telling other people what they do is wrong.
I wouldn’t let degrasse cut my grass
What do you mean by "grass"?
I wouldn't let him 'de - grass' my lawn.
@@Dave_of_Mordor
Does it matter?
@@davebritton7648 Yes Dave, it matters
@@Dave_of_Mordor
Not to me. I wouldn't let him anyway.
Weinstein, though obviously a very smart guy, strikes me as one of those guys who made a ton of money in business, and retroactively ascribed it to purely to his intellectual superiority, which in turn only bloats his intellectual ego.
Neil is the type of guy to wake you up at 3am to tell you that you sleep with your eyes closed.
😂😂😂
Lmaooo 😂
Affirmative action hire.
Well, think about it! It’s counterintuitive. Why close your eyes when it’s already dark out? Is it the darkness that makes us sleep? Yes and no. Ever sleep on a nice afternoon under the sun. It’s not the darkness that causes us to sleep, it’s because you’re tired. Okay so what, does that have to with closing your eyes? Well, you’re tired so you don’t want to move your eyelid muscles. No. Eyelids are pretty light. You see, there was this guy in the nineteen eighties who figured this out and you wanna know why you close your eyes at night? Dust. He did one of those clock work orange machines on people and they all slept. Regular dreams like people always have. However, in the morning everyone had pain in their eyes and saw a bunch of little specks. You know how sometimes you see little specks in your eyes? Those are dead skin cells from your eyes. He figures out that those are the same thing, on they’re coming from the air around us. That’s what dust is! Dead skin! You close your eyes because of dead skin, Joe!
I'd love to see that animated by MeatCanyon lmao
I just listened to a Startalk that NDT was asked what he be doing if he wasn’t an astrophysicist. And he said that would still be a astrophysicist but one who spent all his time in a lab. He is self aware that he has a special talent for teaching and getting people interested in science, more so than just being a great physicist.
He's not a great physicist, and his demeanor spoils whatever sharing skills he might have once had.
@PETERJOHN101 He is pretty good when he is talking alone. If there are more than one person, like a 1v1 interview, or even a panel, then I agree completely. If he is giving more of a lecture or talk, then he's fine, and can even be enjoyable to listen to.
He’s not having any of it cause he’d be interrupting nonstop
Interruptor-in-Chief! that's a great title that actually depicts this horse's A§§ named NDT
Lol
A non-scientist telling a scientist that they're not ready to do science.
He is a Ph.D. in Physics and works on looking at Science to determine if it has applications.
Neil isn’t a scientist ya twerp
Bit like Gates telling everyone they must have the vaccine? Where did his medical knowledge come from? The back of a Cornflakes packet. Sorted.
That’s why Tyson panics and gets aggressive whenever he’s challenged.
@@nateg.6187 Nah.
But thanks for witlessly admitting he's mediocre.
@@nateg.6187 What an embarrassing comment.
@@nateg.6187
What evidence is there for your claims ?
Im just now doing what is called "scientific farts" okay, so everybody just calm the fc down.
@@nateg.6187you just called him mediocre 😂
Feynman was also a brilliant communicator…
Feynman was also a practising physicist, who helped develop quantum electrodynamics and the least action principle. NDT is a brilliant guy, but doesn't actually carry out any physics research. He is purely a communicator of science. It's not an insult, since they ultimately help inspire the next generation of physicists.
Feynman, who is one of the very few people that have radically shaped my thinking on various matters even though I'm of a different culture (I'm an Indian) especially when I myself was aspiring to be a physicist (now a comp sci engineer), was a special personality in terms of communication , pedagogy and actual practice in and even around his field like investigating Space Shuttle Challenger accident. There is no comparison with NDT.
Feynman was a quackhead that's for sure read his biography
These are all gatekeepers.
Advancement in physics has been stifled because of their lies.
Vortex Mechanics were replacing wave mechanics in German textbooks before WW2. Eddington 1919 was debunked by Charles Poor in 1930.
Einstein admitted Dayton Miller disproved Special Relativity in 1925!
None of these people are telling the true history of scientific suppression in the name of state secrecy.
This is the man who learned Spanish so he could give a speech at a Brazilian university... Let that sink in.
Neil Degrasse Tyson is a great storyteller. He has my respect for that, for explaining rather complicated subjects with analogies and simple words, and by doing so he's been inspiring and influencing future great minds to pursue their dreams in science matters. ❤
NDT is the Governments "science guy"
Part of his education was at Columbia and Columbia for a long time, was the hot bed of CIA undercover education. Though, that has shifted some to John Hopkins in more recent times, because Columbia got called out on it.
@@justinw1765And nothing there is a fact, just another convenient narrative. You know nothing.
@@73ajd1 Sure, Tuskagee experiments were a narrative, too. Until they weren't.
That would be Bill Nye.
Eric is a master at wrapping up simple thoughts in complicated language.
Complicated language can be more precise, though point taken. ;)
He likes to hear himself speak.
sometimes that is the case, sometimes he wraps up intermediate thoughts in complicated language too
What great science did eric do exactly? Oh he was a hedge fund director for peter thiel?
@@balklothI get what you're saying but you have to be pretty smart to run a hedge fund.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson is the kind of guy who wakes you up to ask if you were sleeping.
I love listening to NGT. I dont know why this comment has me laughing forever. I guess because I can envision it.😂😂😂
I don't really understand why this made me laugh so insanely much
@coldasalaskaonahoe3134 I can't stand him, but I appreciate your sense od humor.
@rookiegirl5757 The more popular version is "wakes his family up to tell them he's going to sleep." After careful consideration, I do think that's more applicable to his discourse and, therefore, funnier.
You're the Carlos Mencia of RUclips comments
Neil is a Harvard grad in Physics, with a PHD in Astrophysics from Columbia also having postdoctoral research from Princeton. That is DOCTOR Neil De grasse Tyson 🤓 let’s not take that away from him!
Like you said, he's an astrophysicist. Like Weinstein said, which doesn't take away anything from Tyson, he isn't a practicing physicist. Weinstein, on the other hand, has made contributions to physics that far outweigh anything the talking head, Tyson, has.
Thank you
@@joshtaylor6038 You are exaggerating. Weinstein has proposed *one* theory that he hasn't yet published in full for peer review. A *draft* of the paper was released with this interview and it has already been criticized as being full of "gaps" that jeopardize the whole of the proposed theory. At this point, he hasn't really contributed much. NDT has authored or co-authored MANY papers in his career.
Good point! He has participated in research, and I think he could again if he wanted to. Sort of irresponsible to pigeon-hole someone like he is doing. All it takes for this to be made untrue is for Neil to sit down and start researching a new topic. I am not even sure it is broadly true now considering the points you've brought up. He is kind of saying that the only true physicists are those who are participating in the frontiers of physics: quantum gravity, dark matter...etc. The fact that none of the physics is confirmed yet and that publications are possible without experimental confirmation, for me, could even be used as a converse argument to what he is saying. The mark of a real physicist is that they research physics that isn't yet real. What a twist of logic!
@@nothingnewhere6551
Exactly, you have to participate in research and have it accepted and published via peer reviews to have the title Tyson has.
This guy's a bozo.
His arrogance has caused me to dislike anything to do with him.
Eh, he's just not that smart -- nobody needs to know his opinion on anything.
@@hxhdfjifzirstc894They shouldn't care anyways. This idea that linguists, physicists, or scientists in general have any authority on matters outside their field or neighboring fields is nonsense and just modern idolatry filling the hole left by religion. Philosophers themselves have no actual authority or related experience to topics such as politics. Neither do "political scientists/philosophers", ironically.
I'd trust the average person's opinion much more on commentary and proposed solutions to every day problems than some isolated academic. I also guarantee you, if you ran a study comparing the effectiveness of certain groups at making meaningful improvements to general society through governing, the condition that someone has attained a higher educational degree at best shows no correlation, and likely correlates highly negatively. This should be intuitive due to this condition correlating to an extreme divergence in lifestyle and experiences from the common person.
The Soviet Union is what you get when scholars and scientists attempt to form a new governmental system from scratch. A broken, overly idealistic, and poorly executed set of fundamental ideas for a society, dressed up as a utopia, that isn't efficient at doing anything important to the common man but, obviously, extremely efficient at academic pursuits, which inevitably descends into authoritarian autocracy the moment the people realize that their smart leaders will never prioritize anything but their own interests. The irony of the Soviet Union proclaiming itself as a "government of the workers", is likely the greatest in all of history.
There were many founding fathers that were scholars, but their ranks were filled primarily by somewhat intellectually homely people. The ratios of these groups helped renormalize and transform the academic's idealistic fantasies into effective governmental systems for the general populace, at least to a more sufficient extent than the other systems of the time.
Even then, some detrimental idealisms still made it through the filter, and it took literal centuries for them to be removed. With their existence and uprooting nearly always causing mass upheaval and suffering in the common man's life. The best example of this includes such wonderful ideas as slavery (yes, this was primarily supported and practiced by the rich intellectuals like Jefferson), which caused the bloodiest conflict in the nation's history. Remember, even Lincoln, a highly educated Lawyer, didn't want to free the slaves because he thought they were equal, he wanted to free them because he saw the existence of slavery as incompatible with the ideas and future of America. He expressed several times that he thought blacks could not exist in American society, and that it would be necessary to relocate them back to Africa.
Plagiarist
Oh the irony there feckboy
I dont think it helps you to say he willfully ignorant or something akin to a easy to fix human flaw of arrogance, the guy is a stereotypical savant genius with less processing dedicated to mastrubation
Neil DeGrasse Tyson would have been one of the many scientists to deny general relativity when it first came out. Neil is incredibly intelligent, but he’s a hardcore conformist. This prevents him from being unique, and creative.
Knowledgeable and Intelligent are two different things.
You can know everything in a text book which makes you as knowledgeable as that text book. If you don’t understand how to apply that knowledge, you’re not very intelligent.
@@josephcoon5809 Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. Intelligence is knowing not to put it into a fruit salad.
@@roy8200 That's just preference.
Nah, you don't know how the GR model was created. Before of that you had the model of Special Relativity which solved MANY problems in physics (most of which were already proven to be truth) The thing was already in the air, so it was accepted easily. GR is a generalization of that, so Einstein's reputation was already established by the time he published his paper (there were more people trying to find that generalization)
So... even conformist scientists accepted GR rather fast.
Not "incredibly intelligent". I would say "fairly intelligent". I know many, including myself, who are more intelligent.
My takeaway from this interview was his attitude of "I'm the man with all the answers." His argument was a challenge to the status quo, but don't mistake that for being correct or absolute.
"by the way...!"
(Neil interrupts the conversation)
Degrasse is a jr. High school science teacher
At Degrassi Junior High?
And Bret Weinstein still thinks he deserves a Nobel Prize lol
And yet you are still jealous of him
NDT: the man who made Carl Sagan look humble.
😂 Carl Sagan was awesome IMO I don't remember him being as obnoxious as NDT or even arrogant at all but maybe I only watched him narrate and not his real self.
I met Sagan once and he came off as the most arrogant person I've ever met..total jerk.
Ironically The next short had Neil Degrasse Tyson in it
Excellent determination on your part for scrolling back to say so
Science always questions and is never settled.
Try telling that to a climate alarmist or Covidian…
@@josephcoon5809 for real😂 how many times did we hear on the news "the science is settled"
@@piggyslayer1999 What’s worse, when I argued with the zealots who regurgitated that line, they would send me academic papers that used words like “suggests” and “leads us to believe” in the summaries.
Religion is never the problem. Zealotry is the problem, and religion isn’t the only ideology that has mindless zealots.
Until money enters the equation
@@merleshand2442yeah and the money is with the oil lobbyist
Geez, I am an irresponsible borderline quack. I should have gone into science.
Start small..... 🦐 in the basement..
Then ... (Who knows) 🤔 🐳
We'll never know what we lost.
Just go into politics. You could be President. You’re never…never too old.
Just look at Neil talking about vaccines and you can tell he’s mentally stuck in his thinking
Bingo.
Hey look! Another replebeian hick!
He speaks the company line
And you know more? You have a degree in Virology? Biology?
I have a medical degree and can confirm that Neil Tyson chats what we doctors refer to as "pure sh**e" when it comes to Virology.@@chethammer
When he said great science has an element of irresponsibility in it I thought of Terrence Howard immediately😂
NDT cant get enough of his own voice.
NDT is--as my late great mom used to say--a horse's A§§
@@timmyvawwter8898and still he's 1000x smarter than you, some random loser on the Internet.
@@timmyvawwter8898 Bingo.
Sir, this is a Wendy's
you look like a wendy eater
Eric is absolutely right
Tyson is the head of the Hayden Planetarium, he is first and foremost a communicator. Someone whos job it is to help the public become interested in science through television and other means. And I cant think of anyone else in the modern era who has done more for the advancement of science in the public sphere than NDT. So his impact on the world is probably inspiring tons of people to follow a path into the science industries, definitely more so than this guy. Except, Tyson is someone who doesnt go out and trash his colleagues like this guy.
Video doesn’t match the audio. Could be cheap AI voiceover
where's the trashing? What I heard is a very reasonable criticism. Or are scientists supposed to form a circlejerk and be yesmen for each other?
I'm sure this quote came from this guy right after he advocates against vaccines and tries to explain how the world is flat. F outta here.
Weak men trash their colleagues
Except Tyson trashes UAP/alien researchers over a field Tyson has never ever studied, never researched.
Neil isn’t a scientist. He gave all that up to be a media darling.
A man gotta do everything in a lifetime. And to do that he monetized most efficiently what he had. He has seen the climax of his personal success.
@@bikramjeet6536
That was success? 🤣
Yes bro lmao wtf the guy is more successful than anyone in your bloodline@@PETERJOHN101
Eric Weinstein needs to get rid of those bumps on his face.
You need to get rid of the one between your ears....
Neil is a highschool astrophysicist teacher at best.
DeGrasse Tyson taught astrophysics at university level and researched it at post-doc level. You're a clown who doesn't know what they're talking about.
And you are the next assistant manager at McD's, at best
@TwilightxKnight13 Obviously, you can't tell the difference between education and true intelligence, Neil has been educating himself for many, many years, yet true still remains elusive to the poor old bugger.
If you had any intelligent's you'd know this and refrain from such Neanderthal statements.
🤣 🤣 🤣
@TwilightxKnight13 Well, at least I can actually spell MacDonalds, and if you even had half a brain, you would realise I'm right.
Having an education and being intelligent
Are two totally different things.
And by the sounds of it you lack both. 🤣
Neil is like a goated NBA commentator, he understands the game inside and out but he can’t necessarily play at that level. It doesn’t make him any less their jobs are just different. The quacks that reinvent science aren’t gonna go give talks to the public all the time lol
A very good analogy.
Perfect analogy!
Scientists doing the research are sometimes like computer techies -- they can't explain stuff in simple English. So we need people like NDT to communicate to us. A valuable function.
YOU ARE CORRECT, SIR!!!
Like the Tour Guide at Alcatraz.
I don't need understand the Justice System.... Just explain what it was like to be there....
Tyson may not be a great 'CHEF' but he knows how to cook.
True like coders use different coding languages not English so someone has to layman the terms.
Bill Nye has entered the chat
Wasn't he on a spectrum?
@@timothymendoza7798 bill bye. The liberal guy. Bill bill bill bill bill
Bill Nye 72 genders guy
@@vornamenachname594😨😫🤮
Bill nye is the worst. He has no idea what he’s talking about. Is a politician who’s gotten all his statements refuted over the years. I enjoyed watching his stuff when I was 5 though. But he’s lost his mind lately.
You can make a point without hating on someone else ,sounds like hating. Make your point through your own accolades and those who find interest will come. Hater alert
On April 1, 2021, Weinstein released a draft paper on Geometric Unity in a guest appearance on the podcast The Joe Rogan Experience. Weinstein qualified in his paper that he "is not a physicist," but an "entertainer" and podcast host. It received strong criticism from some in the scientific community. Timothy Nguyen, whose PhD thesis intersects with Weinstein's work[b] said what Weinstein has presented so far has had "no visible impact" and "gaps, both mathematical and physical in origin" that "jeopardize Geometric Unity as a well-defined theory, much less one that is a candidate for a theory of everything."
And?
Weinstein is a clown. HE got exposed by joe Rogan of all people when he couldn't explain his geometric unity hypothesis.
Roasted
Sounds like string theorys brother
Eric W is a grifter as many are on JRE.
Love how he's been calling out celeb scientists
We need an entire army of Richard Feynmans.
We have them. They're the kind of people without a big ego, so you don't hear about them. But they have a ton of good quality research publications.
Unfortunately they're getting pushed out as science becomes increasingly corrupted by money and politics.
Exactly!!
One of the best things about the scientific method is that any “irresponsibility” within any research usually has to go through a peer review process, which usually checks down irresponsibilities, or any flaws that may be happening within any research.
Neil may not be a great physician/scientist in terms of introducing new ideas or “being irresponsible”, but he is great at communicating and promoting those ideas by making them more accessible to the rest of us instead of claiming bogus conspiracies
Neil abuses his deep voice. He can go deeper than anyone, and so seems more authoritative. One uses that sparingly, when really important, but he uses that often, and especially when losing an argument.
you don't have to be a borderline quack to know Tyson is a parrot.
What are 95-99% of scientists... that is the point Eric is making.... they sit in Ivory towers, philating each other's dogma within "the science" TM . It's ok, there is knowledge being created, but so slowly to make real progress. NDT is a GREAT storyteller of science and has a library at the tip of his tongue to wax on so well... the entertainment is worth the admission.
Kindly explain quantum entanglement to me, without being a parrot.
Or consider the possibility yo hostility to the man is exogenous to his work.
@@pascalmatthew7242 NDT spews out what he done learnt at Hah-verd. Entangled quantums is his latest rote memorization.
@pascalmatthew7242 considering he pushed pseudoscience like gender theory as soon as it became a thing is what shows he is a parrot.
Tyson is like a politician, a camera is like a light to a moth for him.😊
Here are 25 differential algebraists who do differential algebra. All of them super-geniuses in their own field.
Carlos Arreche, Rick Churchill, Thomas Dreyfus, Victor Edneral, Sebastian Falkensteiner,
Li Guo, Neil Hwang, Antonino Iannazzo, Partha Kumbhakar, Yunnan Li,
Andy Magid, Ronnie Nagloo, Alexey Ovchinnikov, Dmitrii Pavlov, Daniel Robertz,
Valerij Romanovskij, Chitrarekha Sahu, Eberhard Schruefer, Matthias Seiss, William Sit,
Ivan Tomasic, Jorge Vargas, Michael Wibmer, Sihong Wu, Brian Wynne
This guy is so obviously jealous of Neil
No he isn't. He made a valid point. Why does everybody project these days and assume everything has jealous motivations? Grow up.
Imagine being jealous of NDT😂😂🤡
People can’t accept constructive criticism nowadays.
Timothy Nguyen, whose PhD thesis intersects with Weinstein's work said what Weinstein has presented so far has had "no visible impact" and "gaps, both mathematical and physical in origin" that "jeopardize Geometric Unity as a well-defined theory, much less one that is a candidate for a theory of everything."
My money for a TOE goes to Wolfram, the way that his generative algorithm combined with graph theory leads to the duality of quantum physics is very elegant.
Jealous much???
NGT is an educator, and he does a damn fine job of it. I’ve seen many physicists doing the research who have a hard time communicating to layman the basic principles of their work.
Bill NYE doesn’t get nearly half as much hate as Neil Tyson… and Neil is waaaaaaaay more educated 😂😂I wonder why.
Because Neil DeGrasse Tyson is ultra arrogant
Because he's with the basketball people
omg Das so races
Because he comes off as arrogant and egocentric
Because no amount of education can compensate for his personality
Insightfully articulated by a borderline quack. 😂
Why?
@@trawsoza2926He talks about physics as if he were a physicist. But in the end he doesn't talk physics, he only talks about it.
@@da33smith37 oh I see what you mean
Eric _is_ a quack. He tried publishing a paper called "Geometric Unity" that was supposed to be a Theory of Everything, but it's ridiculous and got roasted by the scientific community. I wouldn't listen to a word he says.
Or to put Eric’s logic here another way: “I’m a irresponsible borderline quack, under my definition I’m a ‘great scientist’ because I do bad science. Furthermore anyone who criticises my ideas isn’t ready to do ‘great science’ because the doom themselves to do ‘good science’. This is exactly because they’re not an irresponsible borderline quack.
Lips do not mach the video and i absolutely hate it
Neil can be annoying, but he doesn't deserve this critique from another non practicing academic.
What part of the critique was incorrect?
@@Noplayster13 "He's not ready to think". Eric Weinstein gave up on thinking a long time ago.
@@Mastikator Were you trying to answer my question there? Or are you just saying random words?
@@Noplayster13 "What part of the critique was incorrect?"
@@Mastikator Oh… you’re saying that NGT was thinking for himself… hahaha. No.
Says the guy who is not a physicist on any level
Okay so? Do i have to be a basketball player myself to say joe rogan isnt a basketball player?
@@gvngbvngiggy no, this guy is a hack and an incredibly arrogant person. He goes around claiming to have solved unified theory, to call everyone else stupid and , much like his brother, lacks academic rigour to say the least.
So when he talks about Physics and puts people down I get upset at it - especially given he is nothing more than a grubby hedge fund manager - working with Peter Tiel.
@@gvngbvngiggycan you even dunk, bro?
@@gvngbvngiggy I don't have anything really against Eric Weinstein, but he is just a master at making himself sound ever so wise and mysterious and especially in saying things that will keep getting him invited on popular podcasts and shows.
He is VERY bombastic and grandiose in his speech, but weirdly, nothing he ever says or claims has the grandiosity he ascribes to it. Like "the most scary human being" that's just some mathematician or his newest tale of saying that never in his life met a person that was so clearly a construction like Jeffrey Eppstein and backing it up with the most ridiculous claim that he never met someone less likely to take their life as Jeffrey Epstein.
Sorry to bring the whole Epstein thing into it, but NOTHING about Weinstein's hypothesis has a shred of tangible evidence, nevermind the fact that Epstein clearly had means, motive and opportunity to end himself, with extreme emphasis on motive, being a severe case of covert grandiose narcissistic personality disorder who went from philanthropist billionaire to be known worldwide as a pedophile and having no chance to get out of incarceration. Narcissistic personality disorder has the highest suicide rate and the two most important things for a narcissist are reputation and being in control.
Anyways, Eric Weinstein is literally a poser, change my mind.
@@kayjay7585he called out string therapy and changes the entire popular thought surrounding it
Translation: He presents his knowledge in a way that almost guarantees he doesn’t get cancelled, even at the cost of fathoming mind-blowing theories.
This is a perfect example of Credentialism in our society.
Even in health and diets it's the same.
Although Neil is not a practicing scientist per se, he's a great science communicator, it's good for people especially younger people to get into science.
Finally it gets said out loud. He’s a guy who wears makeup and reads lines for a camera. Like some actors do comedy’s and some do dramas, NDT reads words about sciencey like stuff.
He's inadvertently describing Terrance Howard if you really listen.🤣😂🤣😂
Right then goes on to tell Terrance he's irresponsible with science and math lol
He's describing his own theory/paper which was rejected by Tyson and the scientific community and now he's salty.
Nooooo he said BORDERLINE bro they weren’t full crazy like Terrance is bro, you went full restart on that one.
To people not understanding. “Tyson understands and can articulate what we know as physics is very well, but he does not have the ability to think outside of what he knows”
And what about Eric?
NGL’s Credentials:
- Bachelors of Physics - Harvard (1980)
- Masters of Astronomy - University of Texas (1989)
- P.hD. in Astrophysics - Columbia (1991)
- Postdoctoral Research Associate - Princeton (1991-1994)
- Staff Scientist - Hayden Planetarium (1994)
- Visiting Research Scientist & Lecturer (Faculty) - Princeton (1994)
- Director of The Planetarium (1996-2000)
No Eric Weinstein, NGL IS A PHYSICIST; an Astrophysicist
Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson
"...at a practicing level" is what he said. Essentially, he's a celebrity and too worried about his celebrity and image to go into unexplored territory. A fear of 'looking dumb' or 'crazy', he won't break any new ground. Instead he sits on Twitter and explains why something that happened in a movie wasn't physically accurate. Flexing degrees doesn't tell the story of a person. Eric gave him credit for intelligence. But he won't explore and advance the field.
@ultrameticulous when did he say he was worried about going into unexplored territory?? What are you even talking about. No one expects Tyson to be in some NASA lab doing some nerdy experiments. Discoveries are no longer done by individuals.
I can get a covert organisation to give me one of them background things too.
@@ziggyfreud5357 "them background things"... You're clearly not even intelligent enough to do that.
@@mrt445 cheers 🍻 cobba 👍
I totally get this..... its a very fine line. You need to push it to truly excel
Tyson is an infotainer.
His job is to present progressive science as fact. It's what he gets paid for.
Physics is progressive?
@@Mastikatorhe left physics behind long time ago. He has never published anything perr reviewed. He now promotes women with penises competing in weight lifting against actual women.
Give your head a shake. Try not being deliberately stupid.
Someone need to ask this man with what he have a problem or with what he dont have problem because he always find some problem in someone and never in him self...
If I am wrong about a concept, I want people to point it out to me. Then, I can strive to be better and know the truth. We now have to dress up criticism as people are so thin-skinned. Terrence Howard does not know simple arithmetic. We should just tell him straight that he is wrong.
Man that invented the television was sent to an insane asylum because he said he knew he can take pictures out of the sky and put it in the box🐺
That isn't true at all. Lol
Milo Betto
Perry you shouldn't spread misinformation...
Plowing a potato field in 1920, a 14-year-old farm boy from Idaho saw in the parallel rows of overturned earth a way to “make pictures fly through the air.” This boy was not a magician; he was a scientific genius and just eight years later he made his brainstorm in the potato field a reality by transmitting the world’s first television image.
Philo Farnsworth, a visionary genius.
It was the parallel lines of information.
Neil was owned by Steak um😂
"Jamie, pull up that video of a bear not really being a physicist."
Neil is the professor at the Gilligan's island level
Heard any of f his thoughts about Covid vaccine. You may question his science
Do you have the fundamental understanding of how a vaccine works, Richard? What about immune system?
@@Dave_of_Mordoryes, not an expert but have always had a desire to learn and enjoyed science. A lot of changes since my advanced biology in high school(1976) and dental school (1984) I still fascinated with current information I get from reputable podcasters
Looks like a deepfake video
I didnt notice before but yea it does. The audio might just be out of sync tho
I am not sure who these Wienstien brothers are but I have never really understood why they are given the same crediblity as sam harris and other intellectual atheist. He seemed to critize a lot and offer very little.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson: me no likey.
Talking about extreme jealousy. This guy is extremely jealous of Dr. Niel DeGrasse Tyson PhD. Sounds extremely racist against Niel DeGrasse Tyson.
"This guy" is worth 100 million dollars. He's not even remotely "jealous" of NDT. YOU are the only one bringing up racism---how frickin LAME.
@@jelink22Having money just makes the ego bigger and the jealousy bigger. He’s full of resentment over the physics establishment and he can’t get over it.
Neil is an outstanding astrophysicist with great rhetoric. Haters are always weak people. They are insecure and jealous.
Tyson is so smart and great he doesn't know what a woman is.
@allobove7798 The definition of a woman has become a socio-political issue. It is a way to box people. Anyone who is asking questions about the obvious may have an ulterior motive. Caveat.
@@allobove7798 Obviously, the definition of a woman in today's world has become ambiguous and political. It is no longer a matter of fact but a matter of beliefs.
So, you're saying that people who criticise public commenters are "haters"? How hopelessly lame. There--I criticized you. does that mean I hate you? SNORT
“Cmon guys, let’s do some great science!!”
“Ok, I’m in!
“Now what?…..”
Neil is a great science communicator, so what if he hasn't done groundbreaking research. Trying to discredit him this way as a way to discredit his scientific opinions on matters is wrong. Neil amplifies the scientific consensus, which is dictated by groundbreaking research and thousands of more reputable researchers than Weinstein.
Weisntein never tried to discredit Neil's scientific expertise in this clip. He was just trying to explain the differences between a science communicator and a scientific researcher and he is right, those two are very different things and very few people can be both at once (at a high level).
Pls stop being so insecure and emotionally attached to a multimillionaire who doesn't even know you exist. Take your emotions and biases out of it and watch this clip again from a level headed and rational point of view, you would very soon realize that at no point in the video weinstein is actually disrespecting neil. what he's saying is just basic common sense and I'm sure even neil himself would agree with weinstein on this.
The fact that you got so triggered and offended by something so obvious and simple is honestly so sad and pathetic. pls look at yourself in the mirror and realize your wrongs before it's too late because people like you who are so emotionally attached when viewing and discussing an intellectual topic are the most susceptible ones to going down the conspiracy/unscientific thinking route. I'd recommend you to go to a therapist in order to address this because alot of deep insecurity issues might be the root cause of this kinda behavior.
At no point in this clip was Eric disrespecting or discrediting Neil, wtf are you talking about? are you okay in the head?
Love this guy for staying some facts about Neil the con man.
Con man? Really? Lol sure
Weinstein here is nit much better
lol its a deepfake...its not even real