Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: ruclips.net/video/p_swB_KS8Hw/видео.html! Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with your first box at www.drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom
He isolates himself and calls it cool. These people try to create a new genre of their own league of cool: those that don’t know what he does. But it’s limiting and exclusionary which is what he didn’t want to be earlier in life as an outcast. It’s a funny dry a if watching these people exclude them elves. But hey, you’re an adult. Have at it
He obscures his language to be the smartest in the room, he never learned the lesson that intelligence is also being able to communicate clearly to all levels of education
So, you distrust anyone who says "I know Santa Claus does not exist?" Flying saucers do not exist. I *KNOW* this in the same way you know that Santa doesn't exist.
@@smark1180 your wrong ...I have seen one as a young boy.....there is MUCH that a typical human doesn't know or understand about the way our multi-verse works...admit it to yourself....its the 1st step in learning about anything new....admit your ignorance ! there is much more to REALITY than what your 5 senses reveal to you...were all living in a "box" here on Earth.....and most people don't have a clue whats really going on outside of that "box".....QUESTION EVERYTHING ...be like a scientist...do your research...be skeptical....don't listen to the average man on the street...he doesn't have a clue its hard to live in a World where IGNORANCE is BLISS! A WISE man ?'s everything!
@@andrewrodriguez7310 "Your example is immeasurably ridiculous." Explain how. Also, explain how belief in flying saucers is not "immeasurably ridiculous."
@@smark1180 Easily, I've seen them on more than one occasion. One incident in particular was in broad daylight. It made no sense at all and yet there it was in all its shiny glory for several minutes before disappearing out of thin air. (look up Flight of the Navigator, as a great example) Sure, it's anecdotal, but you don't see anecdotal cases of people seeing an old fat man with a beard in a red/white outfit with freaking reindeer pulling his sleigh flying him through the air. That's how. Let's also act like there's not countless sightings reported along with possible abductions.
I think most of us have been in a business meeting with an "Eric". He talks and talks, and agrees then disagrees, he thinks he's smarter than everyone else and has the snarky sarcasm to prove it, and then he talks some more about things that seem to be vaguely relevant but are actually not, then everyone walks out of the meeting with absolutely nothing accomplished.
Something I've just noticed about Chris' interviews is that he is comfortable with the silence. That's the mark of a skillful interviewer. It takes balls to sit with the space like that.
It takes balls to sit with the space like that? You mean he must have huge bollocks for not talking all the time? How odd. I guess you must really like huge balls but just sitting there not saying anything to him about it?
“Eric, shall I put your coffee on the table?” Eric: “Can you even describe the forces between the particles that constitute a table? Or coffee? You are not qualified to ask me this question”.
I watched this whole interview, and what you don't see in the clip is the host left to take a dump at the 18 minute mark and when he came back four and a half hours later, Eric was still talking. Yeah, it was a long dump.
Oldest trick in the IDW; anytime you are asked a question you either can't or would really rather not answer, or need to boost your ego by making yourself seem smarter than your conversational partner, either forget what words like "believe", "fact", "real" etc mean and claim that no one knows what they mean (think Jordan Peterson here), or throw out some obscure theory (that more often than not is tangentially related at best) or really dense literature that the listener simply must be expert in to even be able to talk to you on subject (Eric but the whole crew uses it). Makes the whole thing seem a little tedious to those that aren't over-wowed by multi-syllable words and a fast cadence (or in Ben's case, extra-extra fast).
I think that is an excellent point. Part of me thinks that the underlying problem here is just that. For example, say a US B-29 bomber crashed on a remote island in the Pacific in 1945, (and the crew bailed out before it hit) that had no knowledge of airplanes. But a few of the islanders had seen planes these fly over, with lots of different theories on what they were. Now, they have one of these crashed B-29's and they decide they are going to figure it out and build one of their own. What would be their odds of even understanding how the thing worked, much less reverse engineering a B29, on this island, without help from another country? And, could you not see every argument being made on that island, being made today about UFO's, being made back then? Huu: "This craft has to be from an advanced civilization." Slag: "If they are so advanced, why did the thing crash?" Even worse, think about the arguments on the islands who saw it fly over, but who don't have a crashed plane. Jut: "I'm telling you all, you just saw a big bird. And, the rumors that the island next door has one on their beach and it's not a bird, is crazy talk." They would have no frame of reference to even intelligently discuss what they were seeing and hearing about.
You've had 5 months to reflect on this. Is this worth watching, or do you feel that this video is so distracting and confusing that you would recommend not watching, and seeking something else?
In 1973, when I was a little girl, my family and I had a close encounter with a craft ... this happened just after dusk and this object first appeared as a light in the distance that looked like an airplane. It then began moving around in a way that our known aircraft do not... it began moving faster and the word I would use to describe the way it moved is "mercurial". At one point it moved swiftly across the sky and then slowed down, came to a stop, then took off in the opposite direction. I was in the car with my parents and little sister. My dad, who was driving, took notice and began following it ... rather quickly, we became closer to it as it became closer to us. My dad pulled the car off of the road to sit and watch ... next thing we knew it was hovering over the top of our car ... it was making no sound, blowing no wind. As I experienced this, I was not thinking "UFO" (again, this was 1973 and I was just a little girl)... I was just wondering what it was. There is a very strange feeling that that one gets when one encounters something so anomalous - that it does not exist in one's known world. My little girl mind was trying to put a label on it ... "Well, it is hanging in the air but it is not a helicopter... because they make a lot of noise and blow a lot of wind." It hovered for a few minutes, at tree-top level, then, according to my mother, it took off at a 45 degree angle. I did not see it take off because, by that point, I was terrified and hiding in the back seat. I was scared. I have no idea what it was. It did seem like it moved in such a way as to purposely attract our attention. It seemed like it knew when we had spotted it and, from there, it seemed that it anticipated our responses. But I have no idea what it was. I guess the Occam's Razor explanation might be that it was an experimental, high-tech drone (human technology) that was being used to perform psychological experiments on folks in the 1970s... to see how they would respond to seeing unexpected, unexplainable (and potentially, frightening) aerial craft ???? There are so many ways to look at this phenomenon ... we need to be both rational and open-minded. Lest we have a new religion form from all of this... and I would not be shocked to find that this might have been part of its purpose. But I do not know! It's a mystery to me.
Thanks for that. I witnessed something similar to your description along with several other people, I can’t explain what it was. I know it was real. Just waiting for a rational explanation.
Some people have similar experiences but would classify them more like "paranormal". In the end, whether we humans call what we see "alien", "ufo", "ghost", "demon", "poltergeist", "orb" or what-now, the same set of beings is behind that "vision". They are "spirit beings", variously referred to as "angels", "demons", and "sons of god" in the Bible. Some of these had previously been disobedient. 2. Peter 2:19, 20 talks about "spirits in prison, who had formerly been disobedient ... in Noah’s day, while the ark was being constructed". These disobedient spirits are the ones referred to as "sons of God" in the narrative leading to the global flood in Genesis 6:1-4. The flood forced them to return to the spirit realm where they have allied themselves with Satan to mislead the entire inhabited earth. So people often have "religious sentiments" in connection with these sort of sights, but they are not from God.
@@mb1287t It definitely was, or they were, as there were several of them. I knew there was no man made aircraft or space craft that could travel at that speed or manoeuvre as they did. We were crossing the pacific, still a few days out from land, guys on watch gathered up anyone they could find to witness what they were seeing. We watched the display for maybe 30 minutes. It left me feeling quite humble. Strangely no one talked about it afterwards.
Basically 99.999999% of us have absolutely no idea whats going on and the phenomena of ETs is so unimaginably complex our tiny minds just cant comprehend it .
I have a pretty good idea that the odds of it being a hoax is far greater and that the technology to create them has increased. Would be quite a coincidence to have visitors right when it could be staged convincingly now wouldn't it?
@@Greg042869 Hey there, thanks. For sure there are many interpretations to that. Vortex math for example. Should you like some math and went to Europe I will be more than happy to have a discussion. Or maybe I can flip the table and went to US. Cheers
I love listening to Eric on this subject. Everyone else either talks about what they think they know or what they strongly believe. He is basically just like "This whole thing is weird. I have no idea what's happening. But it's intriguing and I want to know more". Which is basically where I am with it.
@@sicknado Actually, the biggest advances in human history were made when we stopped trusting our own beliefs and started gathering data from the environment that challenged out thoughts. When you confront data (not beliefs) you grow. When you assume your beliefs are data, you become a weak delirious little person.
Sorry Eric - in January 1968 at approximately 6:00 p.m. I (a young police officer - off duty), along with my neighbour (a reporter for a large newspaper) witnessed for over 20 minutes a massive triangular craft (about the size of a football stadium) that glided almost silently over our residential homes situated on the outskirts of a large Canadian city. It was not an aircraft. It stopped for periods of time, made right angle turns, and had three lights (red, yellowish and green). It moved southward across a barren field and hovered over major hydro power lines. Then this craft was joined by five other smaller craft. A few seconds later they accelerated away and completely disappeared. I wrote an official police report when I returned to duty. My neighbour's employer (the large newspaper company) would not allow him to write about what he witnessed. You can't explain away what we saw. Was it an alien craft? Quite possibly. Could it have been a secret caft of US or Russian origin? Possibly, but highly unlikely.
With all due respect to you as a police officer, Eric is saying that he does not believe in "shiny metal aircrafts" as ordinary aircrafts: you are saying it. It could have been an unknown energy.
Thats the TR-3B plane program. Like the F117 was back in the day, its a new militairy aircraft....im not even surprised or interested in that anymore....this is just a human craft.
@@joostonline5146 Ah yes!! The football-field silent hovering anniversary edition. With many guest appearances in rural areas (despite being military and super secret) all over the world, also the Phoenix Lights special guest. Make no mistake, it's JuSt a huMan AirCRafT!!!
I have analyzed what Eric said in this clip using the technique described in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series. I succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications-in short all the goo and dribble-and found there was nothing left. Everything canceled out. In this clip, Eric didn't say one damned thing.
Never mind this that, and the other pleasantries. You just make sure you know wtf Riemanian manifolds and determinant line bundles are, & how to intelligently discuss how, where, when, for + from whom you got the info. THEN perhaps you just MIGHT be qualified to talk about WHY we should givva dang.
How about "Google has altered search results during an unknown amount of election cycles"? Because we know it was done in 2016 and beyond, and we know that in 2024 Google's new AI accidentally revealed that they alter your input query with algorithm filters before executing an action.
@@AncientMysteriesAndInnovations well he's not really wrong. If you aren't well versed in physics good luck trying to explain anything that's even remotely connected to reality.
@@fVNzO yeah, there is definitely some truth to that, but that also means he's a poor science communicator if the layperson isn't qualified to hear his thoughts. I do like Eric, but he has that tendency
@ 3:05. So Eric, because YOU haven't seen anything about aliens or spacecraft or NHI, then it's "anybody's guess"?.... What makes Eric Weinstein so special? What gives you the authority to conclude if something alien/spacecraft/NHI related is real or not?
I’d love to see a conversation between Diana Pasulka and Eric. She’s been in contact with everyone from the Vatican to numerous high level people within NASA, the CIA, and other governmental programs from the US and other similar programs in other countries who have told her and shown her quite a few startling things. She’s also met and had numerous conversations with some of the most compelling and credible experiencers out there. She comes at the subject from a very different angle and it would just be interesting to see what could come of a conversation between them. Numerous people have explained that a big part of the issue surrounding disclosure is that not only is the topic heavily compartmentalized, the protocols that have built up around the entire thing in all the different departments makes it all but impossible for anyone to say anything definitive. It’s a knot that needs undoing for sure.
Because UFO evidence is vast and most people like Eric don't care about the subject so they aren't aware of it's history and evidence. If someone is actually interested in finding out what a UFO is, there is a ridiculous amount of evidence and stories to follow. People just aren't aware because they don't care. Most people aren't even aware that flying saucers appeared over the white house 2 weekends in a row in 1952 causing an airforce response, freaked out all the radar men and soldiers. They haven't heard the bast amount of stories from soldiers throughout history seeing things behind closed doors they shouldn't have. They dismiss the stories of soldiers who come right out and say I saw a flying saucer. They dismiss the hundreds of radar men and airforce pilots that constantly see and track craft on radar with no explanation, with technology that would change our world forever if it was public. Even if you think UFO's are man made. Just the technology alone would completely change our way of life. To fly and operate how they do you need sciences way beyond where we are at now, and if they are hiding some of those, like gravitational flight, they could literally upend our world of travel in one night. Eric thinks he has a valid opinion because he feels he's smart and intelligent in a few different areas, so he feels his opinion about UFO's carries weight and importance. "IF Eric says it's weird and doesn't think they are alien," Then he must be right because he's very smart.
@@Tim21189.... I hate to say it..... But he's actually more like Eric Dyson...... A purveyor of word salad. Niel is a giggler and an obvious shill. He rudely pushes into his host but he doesn't talk over the heads of the audience. This guy constantly, casually throws in specialized language without explaining it's meaning in a very rude and condescending way. Tyson and Wienstien are different types of Snobs.
Witnessing two flying saucers in 1965 at a young age, I had a very natural instinct that they're not human. What they could do and where they did it was totally off the charts from what humans do with flying crafts that are made. Humans don't do test flights in flying saucers over neighborhood roads and towns as test or practice. You're in for the shock of your life, no way they're human.
@@garythecyclingnerd6219 are you serious? There's more "Bigfoot" videos on RUclips than ever before. It's a hot market right now. I'm not disagreeing with you or saying you're wrong, but ufo and "sasquatch" videos (and tales) have gone up, not down.
Guy, you seriously are talking out of your ass. They quite literally can’t be anything except humans, as they’ve only ever been seen here, and we’re the only species with vehicles here. It’s not rocket science dude don’t be so gullible. If there’s even a possibility of aliens, which there is %0 as earth is literally the only thing that exists, then it’s just as likely to be fairies from a magic forest. Both have the same amount of evidence
@garythecyclingnerd6219 high quality cameras? What are you smoking? The cameras everyone has on their phones are great at up close high resolution pictures. They are absolute garbage at taking photos of things twenty to thirty thousand feet in the air and often in low light conditions.
I did that! Not for Eric but this pastor I knew. He had the weirdest hair, kind of an mop top Beatles cut, yet also a mullet. We thought it a toupee. I found a current picture of him and photoshopped some really cool hair styles, including his own from when he was a teen ager. What he was sporting was so embarrassing (he and his family sang around the world) that I actually sent it to him. Don't know if it helped or not.
So it looks like "Riemannian manifold" and "Determinate Line Bundle" are Differential Geometry jibber jabber likely used in this context in regards to Space Time and the bending of it. For those who cared not to wiki his odd fucking pretext to his monologue.
Every time I listen to him, I notice my attention can be charted as an inverse parabola that starts very high then rapidly drops down over the time axis to near zero without actually hitting zero.
@@shannonhenson609 That's absolutely true and applicable for those who believe there's nothing to be learned or gained from said wise man. Thankfully I am not one of those people.
imo he’s perfectly capable of talking like a normal person but he says things like “no, I’m being serious” and “you think I’m joking?” and pauses like that bc it makes him feel like he’s forcing the other person to wait on his every word and take him super seriously
And he said it with a straight face. It would have been different if he said his podcast reaches 4 million people or he's taught that many, but actually 'talking to' is ludicrous. He was so arrogant.
I love being a functional scientist watching a mathematical theorist using terms that have no real relevance to the subject like determinant line bundle and reimannian manifold in a dismissal of arguments like theories on the existence of sentient non human beings when they're simply non Euclidean or non linear geometric devices (tools for mathematicians). He seems to embody the adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" only with mathematics priciples. I feel we should chain mathematicians to a basement and feed them the calculations we need solved. Letting them theorize practical dynamics just allows them to convolute any subject, in a really pompous kind of way.
Sure it does, it’s stated pretty clearly there’s a hierarchy of angels and demons, some are hybrids some entirely physical beings the nephilim. No they aren’t all evil, angels are in a different plain too
@@kb_devthere's nothing he said that couldn't be logically inferred, no special knowledge required. Because we know or understand so little about the subject matter, we could be observing multiple related or even completely unrelated phenomena and events, and we wouldn't know any better until we learn more. Regardless of whether or not that's true, it's an entirely reasonable speculation until proven otherwise.
Unlike Eric, I have literally been with 500ft of a massive craft when it "popped" in. It didn't fly in. There was a extremely quick and big atmospheric event, and the craft literally popped out of it and flew away to the south. This was sub 500ft! Over a residential area on a cold crystal clean night. Craft had no lights, no sound, no air displacement etc. It was shaped like a manta ray and was at least 250ft tip to tip. Now what I think about the dimensional aspect. To many people think they "live" or are coming from another dimension. I don't think it's that. I think they have figured out how to isolate dimensions. We are bound to 3+1. Well if we where to figure how to remove one of more dimensions during travel, things get fast very quick. If you remove length, time doesn't matter. If you remove time, lentgh, width, depth, none of that matters, thing become instantaneous. How do we measure power? Time over distance. How do we speed that up? Add power! Somone or something has figured out how to get around what we know. And it may be a system that doesn't require much power to actually travel on. The craft I saw was insane in size, yet looked completely weightless. It didn't look high energy. It looked effortless.
@laidoffjournalist Nope. I'm in Cornwall Ontario Canada. I do live about an hr from both main Lockheed facilities in Canada, but this craft was not from here. Like I said, one minute it's crystal clear skies, next Minute there is a craft the size of a football field popping out of thin air and just floating by.
What your describing in being effortless is the golf swing of the immortal Bobby Jones. Powerful, and yet, so silky smooth you'd swear you're witnessing an angel of the C A S O D E X. Now let us pray for ultra smoothness in all that we do. Thanks
I read about this in a book by Nick Cook, "The Hunt for Zero Piont" (2001). He was an investigative reporter from England that followed the trail back from the top secret Aurora project, to the stealth technology, and the 70s deep "Black Project" research into antigravity based on Nazi experiments of the 1940s. He interviewed ex-NASA employees, members of the military, airforce, German and Russian scientists, etc. Fascinating stuff. It really leaves you with the thought of how far they might of progressed in the last 20+ years. 👍🏼
UFO or uap are ultra top secret projects! Aliens topic is just a distraction to hide their stuff! People don't realize that you can search on Google that the first flying saucer was human made by Russia. People are blindfolded
@youngdylan5083 no it's not. The physics of how they literally got here don't much matter. At least not until we understand why they are here, what they want, who they are, etc.
@@derbin4048 Agreed. Also, how does anyone know physics has anything to do with it. Eric thinks physics is the end all be all, but it can't get us to visit other planets. So, as far as we know so far physics is as useless as anything else in understanding how they travel. So even though he thinks he's the smartest person on the planet he's no closer to understanding it more than anyone else, which means everyone is invited to the table... even asshole, smug physicists.
I am a knower, not a believer, of this strange topic. I can't tell you the name of what I experienced or where it came from, only that it is. I experienced it along with witnesses. It was amazing and it killed off that quick to scoff part of my ego. In an instant it made all the people who smirk at this subject (including myself) look really dumb, closed minded, and arrogant. Science can tell me I didn't experience this and it doesn't matter anymore because I saw and I know.
That was debunked. The days leading up to that sighting the kids were given lessons on the myth of UFO's and Aliens and shown movies and documentaries of UFOS and Aliens and so the next day they all went around saying 'I saw a UFO, you saw a UFO etc etc" They were fed it into there imagination!
The reason the shiny craft are real is the simple fact that individuals from all walks of life have been seeing them in the sky for many decades. You see the problem with asserting there's no "proof" of their existence is the fact people can't stop seeing them; and on occasion taking credible photos as well. Thus, they are on the misty edge of our culture, yet deeply ingrained in it via all manner of media.
@@BobR-b4o Arizona lights? Video plus thousands of witnesses. The governor himself, a former member of the air force said he saw the craft itself, along with many others. I mean at some point you either believe that something is happening or you believe that pilots (military & commercial), astronauts, police, and others from all walks of life are lying. Do your research. There are astronauts, and pilots from all over the world who've seen them.
i've said it before, so i'll say it again; and this really applies to anything you want to know: getting the right answer is not tricky or difficult, it's easy AF even. the difficulty lies in knowing to ask, and HOW to ask the right question(s). and sometimes you don't even need to ask, you can easily trigger truthful answers simply by making factually incorrect statements.
@@ScootMcNichols SAME! I respect any RUclipsr that has the decency to put the ads in right at the end of their vids. It's common curtesy to the viewer.
I really like Eric and Bret Weinstein. Always speaking truth, when they’re wrong they always correct themselves. Their information is always valuable and worth listening to. I love Eric’s confidence in himself that some people will mistake for arrogance. Great job, Chris Williamson and Eric Weinstein Keep up the good work! The truth.
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg Whatever makes you feel better, I guess. How does a person determine who’s a bot? Is there a manual, a process, a procedure, a protocol for determining who’s a bot or not? If so send me the link. I’m interested, knowledge I’d like to have in my tool kit.
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg Bit of name-calling there Sasuke - I've been called worse. To stand out as a human, perhaps I need to be even more succinct like you, with just a three word comment, and to top it off, leave out punctuation to show off a lack of effective schooling.
No offense meant here, but, do you realize that your skepticism is actually negativism? It is not your fault, as negativism is all around us, particularly in the media. Dig under negativism and you'll find nihilism, the rejection of the material world as dirty and degraded, Calvinist stuff.
Imagine a trampoline stretched over a bumpy landscape. That bumpy landscape, in the world of math, is called a Riemann manifold. It's like a curvy sheet that can bend and twist in different ways. Now, imagine bouncing a small ball on this trampoline. As the ball rolls around, it feels different forces depending on the bumps and dips it encounters. That's kind of like a determinant line bundle. It helps us track how these forces change as the ball moves across the bumpy Riemann manifold. So, to put it simply: * Riemann manifold: A bumpy, curved mathematical landscape. * Determinant line bundle: A way to track how things change on that bumpy landscape.
I think what he means is modern physics has something wrong with it and it’s strange that top level physicists are holding onto something that’s been proven wrong time and time again
1. Say something outrageous to make yourself the center of attention. 2. When challenged about what you mean, obfuscate, dissemble, introduce unnecessary complications, and when that fails... 3. Say something else outrageous to retain you position at the center of attention.
Why does nobody ever remember to ask if they’re from earth because they’ve been seen here coming up for thousands of years. Yea we probably have programs but also there are probably ancient beings that have been here forever.
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg You believe in a book of plagiarized bronze age fairytales that says the world is 6000 years old, a magical man created the universe, and that he throws all who he made without faith into pit of eternal torture. Oh but I’m the child for not buying that shit
He does a service for Uber-skeptics though. His take is helping loosen the shorts of those who prefer present facts being the limit to reality. Sorry. No. One thing we know is that we don’t know physics.
sounds like you want answers that everyone else wants but you are not willing to do any work. then you try to simplify it for the other people not willing to do the work for likes
Eric Weinstein is one of the most fascinating person I've found on RUclips. The interviews with him blow me away. I would love to talk with him over a beer, wine, coffee, tea, whatever he prefers to drink, and just ask questions and listen to him respond. He is an absolutely brilliant and fascinating man. In fact, I'd love to hear a conversation between him and Jordan Peterson but I'm afraid they would leave me in the dust of their fast paced intellects. Thanks you Eric for making yourself available to the public and persons such as I.
@ 2:31 I thought UFOs was total nonsense. Chris - "Why" . Eric - "What do you mean"? This guy is so full of BeeSss. Then goes on saying he talked to 4 million people telling the same stories.... OK.... riiiiight.
Curious if Eric wants nothing to do with Dr Gary Nolan’s SOL Foundation or if he believes he might be able to help them bring the phenomenon down to the mainstream sciences.
He mens that the phenomenon is closely related to the concept of the eternal soul and that we are all such souls, but in a human body on this planet. If you compare messages from nhi or uap they all come down to: Love, grow together as a human Family, stop nuclear weapons. I recommend you to watch Diana Pasulka, Chris Bledsoe and Dorothy Izatt.
Yes. With the maturing landscape within this subject and technology, even though I believe in ETs, it will be difficult to convince me we have the real thing. I'm weary of stagecraft.
If we had this technology we would have used it for military or commercial applications by now. That's all we do with technology. Use it to make money. That's why the idea that we have this technology is absolutely ridiculous
I think it would be so fascinating. If Eric was in the next possible sol foundation, I mean he should be. Specially, since you have people like Kevin knuth taking part in it.
There is always more that’s why people who pretend like they have all the information are the dumbest. Don’t act like you know what’s going on we are lied to constantly and they wouldn’t tell you the truth about anything unless they benefit from it. People have no idea what’s going on in the world yet have such strong opinions lol
Hello you savages. Watch the full episode with Eric here: ruclips.net/video/p_swB_KS8Hw/видео.html! Get a Free Sample Pack of all LMNT Flavours with your first box at www.drinklmnt.com/modernwisdom
Bret on Rogan
Eric on Williamson
I'm a simple man. I see Weinstein bros, I watch.
Try listening without looking. Its the message. Not the messenger
Perhaps they are much closer to Earth than we think, like within our Solar System.
I'm glad your comment was the first one I saw because i was going to say the exact same thing. Thank you!
@@KitaJabig Don't forget Bret on Jones! 😄
Eric has such a brilliant way of taking complex ideas and making them exponentially more confusing and vague
Got me in the first half
This really made me laugh, thanks. 😂
He isolates himself and calls it cool. These people try to create a new genre of their own league of cool: those that don’t know what he does. But it’s limiting and exclusionary which is what he didn’t want to be earlier in life as an outcast. It’s a funny dry a if watching these people exclude them elves. But hey, you’re an adult. Have at it
I don't agree but this made me laugh 😂
Also, his pauses in conversation make me and I imagine the interviewer uncomfortable.😂
Chris: "Why?"
Eric: "What do you mean?"
Brilliant.
I may be laughing about this comment all day. 😂
I stop talking to people when they pull this. Maybe that’s the point.
Life in a nutshell
Come with me on a meandering journey to nowhere.
FWIW, the more-specific question Chris responded reframed the convo in decent context.
"An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity"
Terry Davis
Truer words...
Sounds good at first, but is nonsense after all tbh.
thanks! this guy is such a bs artist. degree means nothing i guess.
True that, A Genius can reduce a complicated equation and reduce it down to its simplest terms
@@drd1924 Feynman, by contrast.
The amount of effort this guy puts into saying absolutely nothing of any consequence is really impressive....
Scientists tend to break down and explain every detail of their thought process any time they speak.
@@James_RenzEric isn’t a scientist
@@Fank234an investor and financial executive, yet always talking like a scientist. Got that Bill Gates vibe written all over him
He obscures his language to be the smartest in the room, he never learned the lesson that intelligence is also being able to communicate clearly to all levels of education
@@stdetain3187 Very valid point. Language can be used to clarify or to obfuscate. How it is used reveals a lot about the person doing it....
When ego limits possibility nothing can be learned.
💯
and adversely, if what's leaned is rigid, it limits ego. Which is a good thing.
@@PLF... Yeah but ego always finds a way!
Confucius say, man who goes to bed with itchy butt, wakes up with smelly finger.
@@Steven-lb4bl Tale as old as time.
The most reassuring part of what Eric says here is, "I don't know". Those who claim to know earn my distrust.
So, you distrust anyone who says "I know Santa Claus does not exist?"
Flying saucers do not exist. I *KNOW* this in the same way you know that Santa doesn't exist.
@@smark1180 your wrong ...I have seen one as a young boy.....there is MUCH that a typical human doesn't know or understand about the way our multi-verse works...admit it to yourself....its the 1st step in learning about anything new....admit your ignorance ! there is much more to REALITY than what your 5 senses reveal to you...were all living in a "box" here on Earth.....and most people don't have a clue whats really going on outside of that "box".....QUESTION EVERYTHING ...be like a scientist...do your research...be skeptical....don't listen to the average man on the street...he doesn't have a clue its hard to live in a World where IGNORANCE is BLISS! A WISE man ?'s everything!
@@smark1180 Is this a joke? Your example is immeasurably ridiculous.
@@andrewrodriguez7310 "Your example is immeasurably ridiculous."
Explain how. Also, explain how belief in flying saucers is not "immeasurably ridiculous."
@@smark1180 Easily, I've seen them on more than one occasion. One incident in particular was in broad daylight. It made no sense at all and yet there it was in all its shiny glory for several minutes before disappearing out of thin air. (look up Flight of the Navigator, as a great example) Sure, it's anecdotal, but you don't see anecdotal cases of people seeing an old fat man with a beard in a red/white outfit with freaking reindeer pulling his sleigh flying him through the air. That's how. Let's also act like there's not countless sightings reported along with possible abductions.
I think most of us have been in a business meeting with an "Eric". He talks and talks, and agrees then disagrees, he thinks he's smarter than everyone else and has the snarky sarcasm to prove it, and then he talks some more about things that seem to be vaguely relevant but are actually not, then everyone walks out of the meeting with absolutely nothing accomplished.
Loool
Right, pure arrogance…..
Hey you were at that meeting too then
@@artsmart Ho it was you ?
😂😂😂
The bigger question is if Eric's hair is a wig
if it is indeed a wig, it cannot be googled.
I don't know, but isn't it gorgeous?
It's an interdimensional hair piece
Inside that wig could be a little alien and he will never know
he answered that question already in a joe rogan's podcast it's his real hairs
Something I've just noticed about Chris' interviews is that he is comfortable with the silence. That's the mark of a skillful interviewer. It takes balls to sit with the space like that.
Your observation is very intelligent, too.
Welcome to Finland. Silent nation
or perhaps… he doesn’t know what kind of question to ask 😂😂😂
@@sg1678 🤣🤣
It takes balls to sit with the space like that? You mean he must have huge bollocks for not talking all the time? How odd. I guess you must really like huge balls but just sitting there not saying anything to him about it?
“Eric, shall I put your coffee on the table?” Eric: “Can you even describe the forces between the particles that constitute a table? Or coffee? You are not qualified to ask me this question”.
Also Eric "I love myself so much"
I watched this whole interview, and what you don't see in the clip is the host left to take a dump at the 18 minute mark and when he came back four and a half hours later, Eric was still talking. Yeah, it was a long dump.
Hahahaha perfect🤦♂️
Oldest trick in the IDW; anytime you are asked a question you either can't or would really rather not answer, or need to boost your ego by making yourself seem smarter than your conversational partner, either forget what words like "believe", "fact", "real" etc mean and claim that no one knows what they mean (think Jordan Peterson here), or throw out some obscure theory (that more often than not is tangentially related at best) or really dense literature that the listener simply must be expert in to even be able to talk to you on subject (Eric but the whole crew uses it). Makes the whole thing seem a little tedious to those that aren't over-wowed by multi-syllable words and a fast cadence (or in Ben's case, extra-extra fast).
@@Kube_Dog om my god Im gonna die from laughing so hard
Admitting you don't know is part of the path to discovery of truth. Thanks Eric for not pretending to know.
That’s not what he said, that’s what he wants the ‘lessers’ to belive he said. He just didn’t make a line in the sand, but he has one
@@hoopslaa5235he literally admitted he doesn’t know several times, try harder
I think that is an excellent point. Part of me thinks that the underlying problem here is just that. For example, say a US B-29 bomber crashed on a remote island in the Pacific in 1945, (and the crew bailed out before it hit) that had no knowledge of airplanes. But a few of the islanders had seen planes these fly over, with lots of different theories on what they were. Now, they have one of these crashed B-29's and they decide they are going to figure it out and build one of their own. What would be their odds of even understanding how the thing worked, much less reverse engineering a B29, on this island, without help from another country? And, could you not see every argument being made on that island, being made today about UFO's, being made back then? Huu: "This craft has to be from an advanced civilization." Slag: "If they are so advanced, why did the thing crash?" Even worse, think about the arguments on the islands who saw it fly over, but who don't have a crashed plane. Jut: "I'm telling you all, you just saw a big bird. And, the rumors that the island next door has one on their beach and it's not a bird, is crazy talk." They would have no frame of reference to even intelligently discuss what they were seeing and hearing about.
The Mark of Intelligence. Trump will never say he doesn't know.
The comments section proves bro podcasting speaks to the male equivalent of Oprahs brain dead audience
Just submitted my FOIA requests for Romanian manifolds and determinant line bundles! Wish me luck! 😂
Riemannian Manifold
Brilliant 😂😂😂
Got mine at Walmart. On sale!
Lol
@@ianmangham4570That’s what he said….but it was in Navajo Code☺️
Eric is the only person who will talk so much and actually mean virtually nothing
You've had 5 months to reflect on this. Is this worth watching, or do you feel that this video is so distracting and confusing that you would recommend not watching, and seeking something else?
You think? Check Dr Stephen Greer. Literally speaks for hours and gives nothing... for decades.
@@JT-si6bl What you doing to help in the search for true around the UFO subject?
@@monkeyking2706 Believe my eyes if I see stuff without a screen in front of me. Not really aware of any other strategy. Can you suggest?
He’s insufferable
In 1973, when I was a little girl, my family and I had a close encounter with a craft ... this happened just after dusk and this object first appeared as a light in the distance that looked like an airplane. It then began moving around in a way that our known aircraft do not... it began moving faster and the word I would use to describe the way it moved is "mercurial". At one point it moved swiftly across the sky and then slowed down, came to a stop, then took off in the opposite direction. I was in the car with my parents and little sister. My dad, who was driving, took notice and began following it ... rather quickly, we became closer to it as it became closer to us. My dad pulled the car off of the road to sit and watch ... next thing we knew it was hovering over the top of our car ... it was making no sound, blowing no wind.
As I experienced this, I was not thinking "UFO" (again, this was 1973 and I was just a little girl)... I was just wondering what it was. There is a very strange feeling that that one gets when one encounters something so anomalous - that it does not exist in one's known world.
My little girl mind was trying to put a label on it ... "Well, it is hanging in the air but it is not a helicopter... because they make a lot of noise and blow a lot of wind."
It hovered for a few minutes, at tree-top level, then, according to my mother, it took off at a 45 degree angle.
I did not see it take off because, by that point, I was terrified and hiding in the back seat. I was scared.
I have no idea what it was. It did seem like it moved in such a way as to purposely attract our attention. It seemed like it knew when we had spotted it and, from there, it seemed that it anticipated our responses.
But I have no idea what it was. I guess the Occam's Razor explanation might be that it was an experimental, high-tech drone (human technology) that was being used to perform psychological experiments on folks in the 1970s... to see how they would respond to seeing unexpected, unexplainable (and potentially, frightening) aerial craft ????
There are so many ways to look at this phenomenon ... we need to be both rational and open-minded. Lest we have a new religion form from all of this... and I would not be shocked to find that this might have been part of its purpose. But I do not know! It's a mystery to me.
New religious fanaticism has already emerged with those who believe the human race was created by aliens, so there’s that.
Thanks for that. I witnessed something similar to your description along with several other people, I can’t explain what it was. I know it was real. Just waiting for a rational explanation.
Some people have similar experiences but would classify them more like "paranormal". In the end, whether we humans call what we see "alien", "ufo", "ghost", "demon", "poltergeist", "orb" or what-now, the same set of beings is behind that "vision".
They are "spirit beings", variously referred to as "angels", "demons", and "sons of god" in the Bible. Some of these had previously been disobedient. 2. Peter 2:19, 20 talks about "spirits in prison, who had formerly been disobedient ... in Noah’s day, while the ark was being constructed". These disobedient spirits are the ones referred to as "sons of God" in the narrative leading to the global flood in Genesis 6:1-4. The flood forced them to return to the spirit realm where they have allied themselves with Satan to mislead the entire inhabited earth. So people often have "religious sentiments" in connection with these sort of sights, but they are not from God.
Clearly you witnessed an extraterrestrial spacecraft. There will be people that tell you otherwise. Don't let them.
@@mb1287t It definitely was, or they were, as there were several of them. I knew there was no man made aircraft or space craft that could travel at that speed or manoeuvre as they did. We were crossing the pacific, still a few days out from land, guys on watch gathered up anyone they could find to witness what they were seeing. We watched the display for maybe 30 minutes. It left me feeling quite humble. Strangely no one talked about it afterwards.
Eric is tired of Neil deGrasse Tyson being the King of BS. He wants a piece of that action.
Spot on
I don't know tyson ain't full of shit like this guy.
Great point indeed! Weinstein has not been laid in 30 years - no matter he is full of it. Arrogant beyond compare!
Careful, here comes Terrence.
LOL ahahaahhahahahah well said.
Basically 99.999999% of us have absolutely no idea whats going on and the phenomena of ETs is so unimaginably complex our tiny minds just cant comprehend it .
I have a pretty good idea that the odds of it being a hoax is far greater and that the technology to create them has increased. Would be quite a coincidence to have visitors right when it could be staged convincingly now wouldn't it?
I like the amount of 9s you have used there ;-)
@@James-u6yRegardless of its true nature, something bizarre is happening at a massive scale and we need to get to the bottom of it.
@@PavelHolub-or2ku Look for the nines.
@@Greg042869 Hey there, thanks. For sure there are many interpretations to that. Vortex math for example. Should you like some math and went to Europe I will be more than happy to have a discussion. Or maybe I can flip the table and went to US. Cheers
I love listening to Eric on this subject. Everyone else either talks about what they think they know or what they strongly believe. He is basically just like "This whole thing is weird. I have no idea what's happening. But it's intriguing and I want to know more". Which is basically where I am with it.
And it's a lame, thoughtless and ego centric way to look at things.
@@sicknado It's thoughtless and lame to admit you don't know what's happening and that you want more data? Are you 12?
@@recursivefunk Your lame because you don't even trust yourself enough to take a logical and obvious stance. Yes, thats thoughtless. Literally
@@sicknado Actually, the biggest advances in human history were made when we stopped trusting our own beliefs and started gathering data from the environment that challenged out thoughts. When you confront data (not beliefs) you grow. When you assume your beliefs are data, you become a weak delirious little person.
This
Sorry Eric - in January 1968 at approximately 6:00 p.m. I (a young police officer - off duty), along with my neighbour (a reporter for a large newspaper) witnessed for over 20 minutes a massive triangular craft (about the size of a football stadium) that glided almost silently over our residential homes situated on the outskirts of a large Canadian city. It was not an aircraft. It stopped for periods of time, made right angle turns, and had three lights (red, yellowish and green). It moved southward across a barren field and hovered over major hydro power lines. Then this craft was joined by five other smaller craft. A few seconds later they accelerated away and completely disappeared. I wrote an official police report when I returned to duty. My neighbour's employer (the large newspaper company) would not allow him to write about what he witnessed. You can't explain away what we saw. Was it an alien craft? Quite possibly. Could it have been a secret caft of US or Russian origin? Possibly, but highly unlikely.
With all due respect to you as a police officer, Eric is saying that he does not believe in "shiny metal aircrafts" as ordinary aircrafts: you are saying it. It could have been an unknown energy.
@@RicardoMartinez-oh9sq "aircraft" The are no "aircrafts".
Thats the TR-3B plane program. Like the F117 was back in the day, its a new militairy aircraft....im not even surprised or interested in that anymore....this is just a human craft.
@@joostonline5146 Ah yes!! The football-field silent hovering anniversary edition. With many guest appearances in rural areas (despite being military and super secret) all over the world, also the Phoenix Lights special guest. Make no mistake, it's JuSt a huMan AirCRafT!!!
@@Adiaf8orosHow do u really know that?
I have analyzed what Eric said in this clip using the technique described in Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series. I succeeded in eliminating meaningless statements, vague gibberish, useless qualifications-in short all the goo and dribble-and found there was nothing left. Everything canceled out. In this clip, Eric didn't say one damned thing.
Try using your own brain next time and you might get something.
@@bikerboy3k My comment obviously went right over your head. Have a good day Brainiac!
@@wolfgangamadeus1246 Jesus Christ...
What is the technique described in Asimov's book?
Chris: "Eric, do you want some coffee?"
Eric: "Why?"
Never mind this that, and the other pleasantries. You just make sure you know wtf Riemanian manifolds and determinant line bundles are, & how to intelligently discuss how, where, when, for + from whom you got the info. THEN perhaps you just MIGHT be qualified to talk about WHY we should givva dang.
"There are organisations that you cannot Google"....what a chilling statement
How about "Google has altered search results during an unknown amount of election cycles"? Because we know it was done in 2016 and beyond, and we know that in 2024 Google's new AI accidentally revealed that they alter your input query with algorithm filters before executing an action.
What you hadn’t assumed there were secret societies before this? 😂
Both the United States and the Soviet had secret research proving that telepathy is real albeit an unreliable communication method.
Epstein is one such organizations and it looks like PDiddy is also and maybe just another head of the same.
This isn't even slightly controversial. I could name some of them.
Glad to see Eric humble himself on this subject. It was frustrating watching him dismiss this back in 2021.
Eric, humbling himself. That's a first
he wasn't humble at all. He' saying that only people like him can talk about UFO's because they understand some magical physics terms
@@blitzme99 He always does that
@@AncientMysteriesAndInnovations well he's not really wrong. If you aren't well versed in physics good luck trying to explain anything that's even remotely connected to reality.
@@fVNzO yeah, there is definitely some truth to that, but that also means he's a poor science communicator if the layperson isn't qualified to hear his thoughts. I do like Eric, but he has that tendency
@ 3:05. So Eric, because YOU haven't seen anything about aliens or spacecraft or NHI, then it's "anybody's guess"?.... What makes Eric Weinstein so special? What gives you the authority to conclude if something alien/spacecraft/NHI related is real or not?
Not sure why Eric attracts such hostility. I enjoy listening to him. He's a smart guy.
More like SMART A$$
I’d love to see a conversation between Diana Pasulka and Eric. She’s been in contact with everyone from the Vatican to numerous high level people within NASA, the CIA, and other governmental programs from the US and other similar programs in other countries who have told her and shown her quite a few startling things. She’s also met and had numerous conversations with some of the most compelling and credible experiencers out there. She comes at the subject from a very different angle and it would just be interesting to see what could come of a conversation between them. Numerous people have explained that a big part of the issue surrounding disclosure is that not only is the topic heavily compartmentalized, the protocols that have built up around the entire thing in all the different departments makes it all but impossible for anyone to say anything definitive. It’s a knot that needs undoing for sure.
Because UFO evidence is vast and most people like Eric don't care about the subject so they aren't aware of it's history and evidence. If someone is actually interested in finding out what a UFO is, there is a ridiculous amount of evidence and stories to follow. People just aren't aware because they don't care. Most people aren't even aware that flying saucers appeared over the white house 2 weekends in a row in 1952 causing an airforce response, freaked out all the radar men and soldiers. They haven't heard the bast amount of stories from soldiers throughout history seeing things behind closed doors they shouldn't have. They dismiss the stories of soldiers who come right out and say I saw a flying saucer. They dismiss the hundreds of radar men and airforce pilots that constantly see and track craft on radar with no explanation, with technology that would change our world forever if it was public. Even if you think UFO's are man made. Just the technology alone would completely change our way of life. To fly and operate how they do you need sciences way beyond where we are at now, and if they are hiding some of those, like gravitational flight, they could literally upend our world of travel in one night. Eric thinks he has a valid opinion because he feels he's smart and intelligent in a few different areas, so he feels his opinion about UFO's carries weight and importance. "IF Eric says it's weird and doesn't think they are alien," Then he must be right because he's very smart.
There is no knot! UFO or uap are ultra top secret military projects. Nothing to see here
There are the u tube vids made by hoaxers and by video special effects guys, who identify some of the UFOs as geese.
'A riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma' comes to mind when I hear this guy.
Eric has such an entertaining way of demonstrating his narcism and dunning Kruger bias. What a great Ego!
He is the smartest man in the world according to himself
Neil DeGrasse Tyson’s not too different.
💯
It's becoming less entertaining at an accelerating rate.
@@Tim21189.... I hate to say it..... But he's actually more like Eric Dyson...... A purveyor of word salad. Niel is a giggler and an obvious shill. He rudely pushes into his host but he doesn't talk over the heads of the audience. This guy constantly, casually throws in specialized language without explaining it's meaning in a very rude and condescending way. Tyson and Wienstien are different types of Snobs.
A person that thinks they’re always the smartest person in the room is often wrong.
There's only two of them
Witnessing two flying saucers in 1965 at a young age, I had a very natural instinct that they're not human. What they could do and where they did it was totally off the charts from what humans do with flying crafts that are made. Humans don't do test flights in flying saucers over neighborhood roads and towns as test or practice. You're in for the shock of your life, no way they're human.
Funny how when everyone got a high quality camera in their pocket all of these tall tales of UFOs and Bigfoot disappeared
@@garythecyclingnerd6219 are you serious? There's more "Bigfoot" videos on RUclips than ever before. It's a hot market right now.
I'm not disagreeing with you or saying you're wrong, but ufo and "sasquatch" videos (and tales) have gone up, not down.
Guy, you seriously are talking out of your ass. They quite literally can’t be anything except humans, as they’ve only ever been seen here, and we’re the only species with vehicles here. It’s not rocket science dude don’t be so gullible. If there’s even a possibility of aliens, which there is %0 as earth is literally the only thing that exists, then it’s just as likely to be fairies from a magic forest. Both have the same amount of evidence
@garythecyclingnerd6219 high quality cameras? What are you smoking? The cameras everyone has on their phones are great at up close high resolution pictures. They are absolute garbage at taking photos of things twenty to thirty thousand feet in the air and often in low light conditions.
Maybe your smoke is better. lol in 1965 we didn't have cellphones and most people didn't carry cameras around in their pocket.@@tennesseeheckler3014
Best Weinstein Quote, "either the universe is traversable or it isn't and if it is then they are here." Agreed!! I've been saying this for years.
true
......but it isn't.............................
*2 dimensional thinking.*
No shit Sherlock. Captain obvious.
@@saltybits9954really living up to your name there, eh bud?
I always get distracted with the thought of wanting to pop off his Lego hair and try other styles.
I did that! Not for Eric but this pastor I knew. He had the weirdest hair, kind of an mop top Beatles cut, yet also a mullet. We thought it a toupee. I found a current picture of him and photoshopped some really cool hair styles, including his own from when he was a teen ager. What he was sporting was so embarrassing (he and his family sang around the world) that I actually sent it to him. Don't know if it helped or not.
So it looks like "Riemannian manifold" and "Determinate Line Bundle" are Differential Geometry jibber jabber likely used in this context in regards to Space Time and the bending of it. For those who cared not to wiki his odd fucking pretext to his monologue.
Thankyou. He really is incredibly arrogant.
Butthurt string theorists 😂
If communicating technical topics to the layperson is an art form, which I think it is. Eric's painting with his toes.
He knows there are secrets and he knows we don't know what they are. Furthermore, we are stupid. Giggle giggle.
Phhht.
@@tobystewart4403- agree.
Such is the delivery that once my computer actually froze, it took me a while to notice.
lol. Eric's delivery is driving me nuts.
Your comment is truly hilarious. Thanks for the laugh...
😂😂😂
Every time I listen to him, I notice my attention can be charted as an inverse parabola that starts very high then rapidly drops down over the time axis to near zero without actually hitting zero.
I think he is saying..look this is a physics issue, so ask physics related questions..he is looking for the scientific version of the answer
Nothing like an interview with someone who says he knows nothing. 🙄
one of the few actually intelligent humans........everything you KNOW is wrong
What I don't get how can you sit there with a straight face and lie to the people who are only trying to do good the truth will have its day💯👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🙏🙏
A wise man knows that he knows nothing.
@@pistol0grip0pump A wise man who admits he knows nothing... does not agree to an interview. 🤔🙄
@@shannonhenson609 That's absolutely true and applicable for those who believe there's nothing to be learned or gained from said wise man.
Thankfully I am not one of those people.
"If there's aliens here, I might be the only person on earth capable of understanding the topic" 😂😂😂
Objectively the most anti science thing Weinstein said.
"Extraterrestrial Scapegoat" would be an awesome prog. metalcore band name, lol.
Sounds techdeath to me. Most likely instrumental.
I know right, it’s sexy, isn’t it? There was some X-Files episodes that played in this possibility being the real conspiracy
the Americans made up the Russians just to scare the Chinese... etc
Shorten it to Exscape :)
should really be "Extraterrestrial Space Goats"
Eric’s dramatic pauses make me want to tear my hair out lol
listen at 2x and they are less problematic.
It’s literally just awkward gaps in the conversation due to him not even being able to talk like a normal person.
imo he’s perfectly capable of talking like a normal person but he says things like “no, I’m being serious” and “you think I’m joking?” and pauses like that bc it makes him feel like he’s forcing the other person to wait on his every word and take him super seriously
It's called "thinking".
More people should try it.
Isn't that what you "American"-speaking fellas call "double take" :v ?
This guy is more in love with himself the deGrasse Tyson.
I think it's so weird that people still don't believe this story.
Believe what? Did you see any clear evidence yet? Could be a cover up
@@giespouwen8091The consensus is that something's definitely happening - the question is: what is it?
What story? Felt like i was watching a stand up comic that never got to the punchline... Lol
@@aceloco817there’s a lot of stories that go back as far as story telling.
@@giespouwen8091 Zimbabwe ufo, what more proof do a person need to believe ufo are real.
Bro said he spoke to 4 million people 😂😂
That was weird!
And he said it with a straight face. It would have been different if he said his podcast reaches 4 million people or he's taught that many, but actually 'talking to' is ludicrous. He was so arrogant.
He speaks like he had figured it all out but he hasnt
@@mattkevlarlarock5469 He clearly exaggerated to get his point across better. You can't possibly think he actually meant that literally?
his tone of voice with no hint of a smile showed me he was serious. he's unbelievably arrogant.@@kresimirpleic
I love being a functional scientist watching a mathematical theorist using terms that have no real relevance to the subject like determinant line bundle and reimannian manifold in a dismissal of arguments like theories on the existence of sentient non human beings when they're simply non Euclidean or non linear geometric devices (tools for mathematicians). He seems to embody the adage "if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail" only with mathematics priciples. I feel we should chain mathematicians to a basement and feed them the calculations we need solved. Letting them theorize practical dynamics just allows them to convolute any subject, in a really pompous kind of way.
TRIGGERED!!!!!🤣🤣🤣
I agree, bodypilot. He's irritating.
Classifying "biologics" as interdimensional beings does support the ancient Biblical narratives
Sure it does, it’s stated pretty clearly there’s a hierarchy of angels and demons, some are hybrids some entirely physical beings the nephilim.
No they aren’t all evil, angels are in a different plain too
The answer you are looking for is that, there are MANY explanations for what we are seeing in regards to UFOs.
So Eric has no idea, but you do? Shut up.
@@kb_dev cry more noob
@@kb_devthere's nothing he said that couldn't be logically inferred, no special knowledge required. Because we know or understand so little about the subject matter, we could be observing multiple related or even completely unrelated phenomena and events, and we wouldn't know any better until we learn more. Regardless of whether or not that's true, it's an entirely reasonable speculation until proven otherwise.
But How do I fill out this checkbox? What do I do?! :)
*bot
Unlike Eric, I have literally been with 500ft of a massive craft when it "popped" in. It didn't fly in. There was a extremely quick and big atmospheric event, and the craft literally popped out of it and flew away to the south. This was sub 500ft! Over a residential area on a cold crystal clean night. Craft had no lights, no sound, no air displacement etc. It was shaped like a manta ray and was at least 250ft tip to tip. Now what I think about the dimensional aspect. To many people think they "live" or are coming from another dimension. I don't think it's that. I think they have figured out how to isolate dimensions. We are bound to 3+1. Well if we where to figure how to remove one of more dimensions during travel, things get fast very quick. If you remove length, time doesn't matter. If you remove time, lentgh, width, depth, none of that matters, thing become instantaneous. How do we measure power? Time over distance. How do we speed that up? Add power! Somone or something has figured out how to get around what we know. And it may be a system that doesn't require much power to actually travel on.
The craft I saw was insane in size, yet looked completely weightless. It didn't look high energy. It looked effortless.
Drugs are bad mmmmmmk?
@@cmo5807 are you crazy?
Drugs are great. Lol.
Was it off the California coast? Near the Lockheed Martin 'Skunk Works'?
@laidoffjournalist Nope. I'm in Cornwall Ontario Canada. I do live about an hr from both main Lockheed facilities in Canada, but this craft was not from here. Like I said, one minute it's crystal clear skies, next Minute there is a craft the size of a football field popping out of thin air and just floating by.
What your describing in being effortless is the golf swing of the immortal Bobby Jones. Powerful, and yet, so silky smooth you'd swear you're witnessing an angel of the C A S O D E X.
Now let us pray for ultra smoothness in all that we do.
Thanks
Here here. This NEEDS to be more talked about, and Chris needs more people on actually discussing it the whole episode
This guy talks %100 nonsense and doesn’t even try to theorize. He’s worthless
Have you ever checked out Dark Journalist?
The intelligence and dynamics between your conversations is so intriguing!
I read about this in a book by Nick Cook, "The Hunt for Zero Piont" (2001). He was an investigative reporter from England that followed the trail back from the top secret Aurora project, to the stealth technology, and the 70s deep "Black Project" research into antigravity based on Nazi experiments of the 1940s. He interviewed ex-NASA employees, members of the military, airforce, German and Russian scientists, etc. Fascinating stuff. It really leaves you with the thought of how far they might of progressed in the last 20+ years. 👍🏼
UFO or uap are ultra top secret projects! Aliens topic is just a distraction to hide their stuff! People don't realize that you can search on Google that the first flying saucer was human made by Russia. People are blindfolded
read Annie Jacobsons books.
Ive never been convinced EW's desire to hear himself talk doesnt far outweigh his desire to actually get at the truth of things.
For the first 1/2 of the vid, I thought they were saying “David Koresh”
I bet that was confusing
Lol, right?
I did too the first time they said the name.
Who are they talking about?
Me too! Wait... I bet lots of women said that about Koresh...
Answers a question with a question followed by a long ass pause
The lighting of this video is superb. Shout out to whoever filmed this.
He waffles alot about nothing
He's waffley versatile.
They both do. And he's theatrical when he speaks. And pompous. I wouldnt trust him anymore than Epstien.
@@robambrose4199 🐦 👁️ 🥔 🧇
@@LilacWolfArt The brainwashing was a success lol.
@@LilacWolfArt Thanks for teaching me Egyptian. I didn't realise I could read it until just now !
Eric finally gets serious in the interview at minute 9. He was being very evasive before this.
Not evasion, boredom.
Wait until Eric finally sees one himself, it changes you
Anyone: Morning Eric!....
Eric: Say More!?
He can't give a straight answer if his life depends of it.
Bout like my ex
@@RaikenXion ROFLMAO too relatable
He's just kind of wondering out loud.
welp, a 1:30 seconds in and i feel attacked. we'll let the smart people ask the smart questions and tell us the answers
Why did it all look like you two were not talking in the same conversation. Felt like a montage lol
Actually, it is interdimensional beings.
“You people are not smart enough to be allowed to have these conversations” is a great mindset. Thanks!
It’s a fair point.
@youngdylan5083 no it's not. The physics of how they literally got here don't much matter. At least not until we understand why they are here, what they want, who they are, etc.
@@derbin4048
Agreed. Also, how does anyone know physics has anything to do with it. Eric thinks physics is the end all be all, but it can't get us to visit other planets. So, as far as we know so far physics is as useless as anything else in understanding how they travel. So even though he thinks he's the smartest person on the planet he's no closer to understanding it more than anyone else, which means everyone is invited to the table... even asshole, smug physicists.
@@derbin4048 fair point.
The interviewer should have said thanks, the conversation's over and walked away.
Pauses so long I keep thinking my phone is about to ring lol .. great convo tho 🙂
I kept thinking I lost reception…
I thought it was just me hahah. I was driving and it kept pausing and I kept looking at my phone expecting to see a name lol
It’s his insane narcissism
Hes a character for sure
I thought the vid had ended 😄
Eric is one of the most insightful people in the world. The ability to view things in so many perspectives is Genius
The only thing I am sure of is that the devil is in the details.
I love eric but it is pretty disingenuous to say we cannot even discuss interdimensional beings not knowing some obscure science terms.
I agree with you completely
It stinks of academic egoism which is a great obstacle to all of humanity
Eric should pause for emphasis more 😂
Eric is such an intelligent man and you can easily get lost in his words..but he’s also very down to earth and “normal” which is refreshing
I am a knower, not a believer, of this strange topic. I can't tell you the name of what I experienced or where it came from, only that it is. I experienced it along with witnesses. It was amazing and it killed off that quick to scoff part of my ego. In an instant it made all the people who smirk at this subject (including myself) look really dumb, closed minded, and arrogant. Science can tell me I didn't experience this and it doesn't matter anymore because I saw and I know.
Knowing and believing are two different realities. 😉
Areil School Zimbabwe,very very tough to explain.
Yea that's a wild case
So many cases are hard. Eyes on cinema has the greatest collection of evidence from the last 70 years
Totally agree
That was debunked. The days leading up to that sighting the kids were given lessons on the myth of UFO's and Aliens and shown movies and documentaries of UFOS and Aliens and so the next day they all went around saying 'I saw a
UFO, you saw a UFO etc etc" They were fed it into there imagination!
And school in Australia
The reason the shiny craft are real is the simple fact that individuals from all walks of life have been seeing them in the sky for many decades. You see the problem with asserting there's no "proof" of their existence is the fact people can't stop seeing them; and on occasion taking credible photos as well. Thus, they are on the misty edge of our culture, yet deeply ingrained in it via all manner of media.
I've never seen one of those credible photos, could you post a link to one of them so the rest of us can see it too? Thanks!
@@BobR-b4othe calvine ufo pictures are one of the ones believed to be legit for example, but we can’t really know
@@BobR-b4o Arizona lights? Video plus thousands of witnesses. The governor himself, a former member of the air force said he saw the craft itself, along with many others. I mean at some point you either believe that something is happening or you believe that pilots (military & commercial), astronauts, police, and others from all walks of life are lying. Do your research. There are astronauts, and pilots from all over the world who've seen them.
Humans have been seeing them for millennia.
@@krzykris And fairies. And ghosts.
i've said it before, so i'll say it again; and this really applies to anything you want to know:
getting the right answer is not tricky or difficult, it's easy AF even. the difficulty lies in knowing to ask, and HOW to ask the right question(s).
and sometimes you don't even need to ask, you can easily trigger truthful answers simply by making factually incorrect statements.
Love that ending! Pretty much the most profound statement ever made, and then BAM, you slap us with an ad...🤣
Yeah but I do like that he makes his ad at the end of stuff so you can shut it off, rather than having to endure one in the middle. Nom?
@@ScootMcNichols SAME! I respect any RUclipsr that has the decency to put the ads in right at the end of their vids. It's common curtesy to the viewer.
I really like Eric and Bret Weinstein.
Always speaking truth, when they’re wrong they always correct themselves.
Their information is always valuable and worth listening to.
I love Eric’s confidence in himself that some people will mistake for arrogance.
Great job, Chris Williamson and Eric Weinstein
Keep up the good work!
The truth.
Very well put - I agree 100%.
Bot and bot
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg Whatever makes you feel better, I guess.
How does a person determine who’s a bot? Is there a manual, a process, a procedure, a protocol for determining who’s a bot or not? If so send me the link. I’m interested, knowledge I’d like to have in my tool kit.
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg Bit of name-calling there Sasuke - I've been called worse. To stand out as a human, perhaps I need to be even more succinct like you, with just a three word comment, and to top it off, leave out punctuation to show off a lack of effective schooling.
Dazzling themselves with their own brilliance
No offense meant here, but, do you realize that your skepticism is actually negativism? It is not your fault, as negativism is all around us, particularly in the media. Dig under negativism and you'll find nihilism, the rejection of the material world as dirty and degraded, Calvinist stuff.
@Karma-fp7ho -- And baffling us with their bullshit.
Eric is the equivalent of a brilliant doctor with no bedside manner.
to me, a genius is someone who takes complex ideas and makes it simple. Eric is not half as smart as he thinks he is
Agreed, he sounds way to confident about subject matters he doesn't know for sure
Nikola Tesla was most certainly a genius... do you understand his work? Fuck no.
@@csachleb... please, use the polite version spelling --> "phuque." 😂😂😂
Imagine a trampoline stretched over a bumpy landscape. That bumpy landscape, in the world of math, is called a Riemann manifold. It's like a curvy sheet that can bend and twist in different ways.
Now, imagine bouncing a small ball on this trampoline. As the ball rolls around, it feels different forces depending on the bumps and dips it encounters. That's kind of like a determinant line bundle. It helps us track how these forces change as the ball moves across the bumpy Riemann manifold.
So, to put it simply:
* Riemann manifold: A bumpy, curved mathematical landscape.
* Determinant line bundle: A way to track how things change on that bumpy landscape.
Basics
You might be allowed to ask questions about aliens.
Why? Because Eric does allow it xD
I think I’m in love.
"physics is science fiction" i like the vibe round here
I think what he means is modern physics has something wrong with it and it’s strange that top level physicists are holding onto something that’s been proven wrong time and time again
1. Say something outrageous to make yourself the center of attention.
2. When challenged about what you mean, obfuscate, dissemble, introduce unnecessary complications, and when that fails...
3. Say something else outrageous to retain you position at the center of attention.
Lackatski said they breached the hull of nhi craft. I get what Eric is saying but he's making conjectures without all the necessary facts.
claims are not facts
Eric is so far one of the few who is seriously approaching the subject... Tired of the many "know-it-all" that do not even pay attention the data
There’s hardly anyone covering it, and this dude is the last guy on earth that needs to. He literally doesn’t know anything about it at all.
"There's almost no topic where I can't generate multiple explanations..." Indubitably, Mr. Weinstein.
Why does nobody ever remember to ask if they’re from earth because they’ve been seen here coming up for thousands of years. Yea we probably have programs but also there are probably ancient beings that have been here forever.
Or God created Earth specifically for man and everything else is just a distraction.
@@montestu5502God isn’t real
@@montestu5502 or maybe man created God to create multiple justifications to murder and enslave other men throughout history.
@@garythecyclingnerd6219sure kid😂
@@SasukeUchiha-ql5jg You believe in a book of plagiarized bronze age fairytales that says the world is 6000 years old, a magical man created the universe, and that he throws all who he made without faith into pit of eternal torture.
Oh but I’m the child for not buying that shit
Problem is people are taught what to think but never how to think. Question everything and don't just part what others say.
Say interdimentional space beings one more time 😂🤣😂🤙
I dare you, I double dare you!
...and we'll write you a letter, telling you how angry we are....
Only an interdimentional space being would say something like that.
Everything is interdimensional.
Would’ve liked to know what Eric thought of the Tic Tak and Australian School incident…
Eric: I don't know what's going on. And he should have stopped there
He does a service for Uber-skeptics though. His take is helping loosen the shorts of those who prefer present facts being the limit to reality. Sorry. No. One thing we know is that we don’t know physics.
sounds like you want answers that everyone else wants but you are not willing to do any work. then you try to simplify it for the other people not willing to do the work for likes
@@inadad8878 Huh?
I wish the interviewer was more intelligent, so that an even more expansive discussion could have occurred with Mr Weinstein
Eric Weinstein is one of the most fascinating person I've found on RUclips. The interviews with him blow me away. I would love to talk with him over a beer, wine, coffee, tea, whatever he prefers to drink, and just ask questions and listen to him respond. He is an absolutely brilliant and fascinating man. In fact, I'd love to hear a conversation between him and Jordan Peterson but I'm afraid they would leave me in the dust of their fast paced intellects.
Thanks you Eric for making yourself available to the public and persons such as I.
@ 2:31 I thought UFOs was total nonsense. Chris - "Why" . Eric - "What do you mean"? This guy is so full of BeeSss. Then goes on saying he talked to 4 million people telling the same stories.... OK.... riiiiight.
I listen to all kinds of podcasts about the UFO phenomena, however coming back to Eric for grounding is always refreshing and interesting.
"You don't have a PhD therefore you are irrelevant." Pah-leeease. 🙄
Curious if Eric wants nothing to do with Dr Gary Nolan’s SOL Foundation or if he believes he might be able to help them bring the phenomenon down to the mainstream sciences.
I'd say they want nothing to do with him. His arrogance and condescending manner will put off to many people.
You can never understand NHI and UAP without understanding spirituality
Say more
He mens that the phenomenon is closely related to the concept of the eternal soul and that we are all such souls, but in a human body on this planet. If you compare messages from nhi or uap they all come down to: Love, grow together as a human Family, stop nuclear weapons. I recommend you to watch Diana Pasulka, Chris Bledsoe and Dorothy Izatt.
@@brianmincher716 good one
I used to think that if and when I ever see a UAP or UFO I would think 'Aliens', now if ever I see a UFO, I will think 'Black Ops'.
You do realize this phenomenon predates any concept of "black ops" right ?
@@FunkadelickBut they do now. Can't ignore that.
Yes. With the maturing landscape within this subject and technology, even though I believe in ETs, it will be difficult to convince me we have the real thing. I'm weary of stagecraft.
Far to advance to be black ops.
If we had this technology we would have used it for military or commercial applications by now. That's all we do with technology. Use it to make money.
That's why the idea that we have this technology is absolutely ridiculous
“I might be the only guy….” To under stand how they are here. That’s a very interesting statement.
Real talk always from Eric.W
What a long winded way to say, “Damn, they must be using different physics”
Lol It's almost as if he really did not want to say that.
The more I learn
The less I know
Socrates
Eric is one of the few thought leaders whom is truly advancing the conversation.
Love the Weinstein Bros.
*who*
I think it would be so fascinating. If Eric was in the next possible sol foundation, I mean he should be. Specially, since you have people like Kevin knuth taking part in it.
I am not clear on your reply? I need more than one word :)
Until he finally comes out with something substantial like a rotato, he should not be taken seriously.
@@peterpsylo9178 oh I was being a cheeky English teacher. Who not whom
There is always more that’s why people who pretend like they have all the information are the dumbest. Don’t act like you know what’s going on we are lied to constantly and they wouldn’t tell you the truth about anything unless they benefit from it. People have no idea what’s going on in the world yet have such strong opinions lol