Why the US Can't Contain China’s Tech Supremacy Drive

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 янв 2025

Комментарии • 474

  • @araara4746
    @araara4746 2 месяца назад +743

    Why do you need to contain other countries development?
    Do you think you're the only one have the right to be prosperous?

    • @kolviczd6885
      @kolviczd6885 2 месяца назад

      Yes, America and western world in general have these mindset in them. They can't digest the fact that someone from outside the west is doing better than them. It's unacceptable to them. That's why they have lost their mind.

    • @DaniEles-rc7ij
      @DaniEles-rc7ij 2 месяца назад

      are they white? no? then they must be contained. .

    • @vlhc4642
      @vlhc4642 2 месяца назад

      America cannot be prosperous without exploiting others, therefore America has as much right to be prosperous as criminals has the right to be free.

    • @Blueblackberry-ex2xc
      @Blueblackberry-ex2xc 2 месяца назад +100

      Teachers, Bibles, parents and society teach us to help each other so there won't be people dying hungry. But you don't tell that to America. She loves only wars. ❤😂😮

    • @DC-qn4wz
      @DC-qn4wz 2 месяца назад

      It's all about stifling the development of China and ensuring US global control. Everything else is just a smokescreen.

  • @hibudy
    @hibudy 2 месяца назад +418

    such a narrow vision, no wonder US is hated so much outside of Anglo-saxon sphere...

    • @Repeal209
      @Repeal209 2 месяца назад +4

      Pro tip: try not to expose your CPC shill status by not using words only shills use

    • @DK-yz9xk
      @DK-yz9xk 2 месяца назад +56

      ⁠@@Repeal209lol he didnt Exposé nothing, like it isnt common sense to dislike colonisers

    • @imfromisrael489
      @imfromisrael489 2 месяца назад +4

      @@DK-yz9xk Most of Europe may not want to live in the US but they still view them as an ally. So does Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Vietnam to an extent, Israel. These are all nations outside the anglo sphere

    • @imfromisrael489
      @imfromisrael489 2 месяца назад

      Trust me all your easterner propaganda, and "We are the future, we are rising" BS isn't popular outside of Asia

    • @yuxiangluo8614
      @yuxiangluo8614 2 месяца назад

      @@imfromisrael489 Dude, everybody knows Japanese politicians fucking hate the US, even more than Chinese politicians.

  • @AB_123_AB
    @AB_123_AB 2 месяца назад +353

    Not mentioned is China's absolute dominance in producing STEM graduates.

    • @vestasharp6861
      @vestasharp6861 2 месяца назад +44

      They are also totally dominant in shipping. Both shipbuilding and shipping containers.

    • @behl557
      @behl557 2 месяца назад +6

      Yes and no, they don’t have enough jobs for the massive stem students and at the same time losing the best and brightest of the stem people to Europe and US

    • @AB_123_AB
      @AB_123_AB 2 месяца назад

      @@behl557 The best and brightest are returning to China, thanks to blatant Western racism.

    • @andrean2247
      @andrean2247 2 месяца назад +32

      ​@@behl557 no the bad one goes out. Its already filtered.

    • @DC-qn4wz
      @DC-qn4wz 2 месяца назад

      India too!

  • @Koba_26
    @Koba_26 2 месяца назад +230

    And looking at Boeing, I doubt China would be behind in commercial aircraft for very long 🤣

    • @boiscooka232
      @boiscooka232 2 месяца назад +14

      2030 China will competitive in commercial aircraft

    • @PChan-yt4uf
      @PChan-yt4uf 2 месяца назад +16

      Indeed, wouldnt take long at all. China is already exporting its own planes, no longer just for domestic consumption. That took just 2 years.

    • @Mandom007
      @Mandom007 2 месяца назад +11

      Once there ws-20 engine development is done, than boi o boi, west is gonna cry for a plane overcapacity lol.

    • @ncgn13
      @ncgn13 2 месяца назад +11

      China already sold their commercial airplanes to other countries, and used them for domestic flights. It's only a matter of time, sooner rather than later, for it to be competitive.

    • @turtlesoup8134
      @turtlesoup8134 2 месяца назад +2

      @@Mandom007 thats military grade not for civilian use. The CJ 1000 ND CJ 2000 is the engine for the civilian craft.

  • @yehuo2825
    @yehuo2825 2 месяца назад +103

    not anymore! china already have their own plane!!! other countries are already ordering chinese plane!

  • @MartinNew14
    @MartinNew14 2 месяца назад +174

    You cannot stop the technological power of a country if that country is developing it. Maybe if they were importing it, perhaps, but that's not the case.

    • @thisiskevin1000
      @thisiskevin1000 2 месяца назад +10

      Like they did to Japan, France and Germany in the 80s via the Plaza Accord

    • @andia968
      @andia968 2 месяца назад +10

      Can on small countries but China is huge.That is the problem

    • @Facts..Checker
      @Facts..Checker 2 месяца назад +5

      But Indians thinks India can becomes a superpower by just importing. Fascinating! 😂

    • @Peter-649
      @Peter-649 2 месяца назад +5

      @@Facts..Checker They are behind, battling poverty and old fashion cultural believes, hopefully the Indians will catch up and turn Asia into a powerhouse. Imagine the powerful block it would be if the different Asian nations unite, instead of falling for issues that is engineered by I wonder who to divide them. Divide and rule, and people are too simple to see it.

    • @byhyew
      @byhyew 2 месяца назад +10

      ​@@thisiskevin1000Those are American semi-colonies. China is an independent nation.

  • @JeanGunnhildr88
    @JeanGunnhildr88 2 месяца назад +204

    Don't push a hard task to Chinese, they're not scared, is has been build inside their DNA ,they look at it as a challenge that come to test their abilities you not gonna win them but make them stronger 💪

    • @joshlim4695
      @joshlim4695 2 месяца назад +23

      Resilience and fighting spirit are two prominent characteristics of Chinese DNA aka culture.

    • @ajaykumarsingh702
      @ajaykumarsingh702 2 месяца назад +10

      They know one thing.
      Sitting around won't help them.
      Doing something is better than doing nothing.
      Because failure is a default outcome.
      Doing something gives you a chance of success if not a guarantee.

    • @Blueblackberry-ex2xc
      @Blueblackberry-ex2xc 2 месяца назад +10

      No worries chinese possess "can do attitude" ❤

    • @cwaddle
      @cwaddle 2 месяца назад +1

      Haha i wouldnt go into say so much great things about the Chinese. They are hard working humble people but nothing to flatter too much about

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 2 месяца назад

      @@cwaddle They built the Great Wall thousands of years ago. Before America was even a thing.

  • @kohli-batting
    @kohli-batting 2 месяца назад +121

    You gotta give credit when credit is due. Respect hardworking people.

  • @darvidkoh2707
    @darvidkoh2707 2 месяца назад +152

    China is doing very well to overcome difficulties. You will see the result in the near future when China overtakes the US to become the world's largest economy. According to the Australian Strategic Policy Institute in a report this year, China leads the world in 57 of 64 critical technologies.

    • @yehuo2825
      @yehuo2825 2 месяца назад

      fyi... china is already the #1 world economy since 2014 by ppp... since we are already living in a multipolar world... measuring by gdp becomes irrelevant...

    • @BrowseAndLook
      @BrowseAndLook 2 месяца назад +15

      China is already the largest economy in the world in PPP term, which is a far better measurement than nominal GDP. More impressively, China's industrial output is bigger than the G7's combined.

    • @darvidkoh2707
      @darvidkoh2707 2 месяца назад +9

      @@BrowseAndLook Problem is, China itself doesn't measure its economy in terms of PPP, a measurement used by the IMF which China does not recognize. You see the Chinese media still describing its economy as the second largest in the world. But never mind, whether it is PPP or nominal GDP, China will be indisputably number one in both in the near future.

    • @Airbender-kl7cu
      @Airbender-kl7cu Месяц назад

      Yep

    • @hugopennmir
      @hugopennmir Месяц назад +2

      It’s not about who has the biggest economy, it’s all about the quality of life of their citizens, and China is far away.

  • @jjbully
    @jjbully 2 месяца назад +163

    The big 3 legacy auto makers in US receive US subsidies too, how come they sucks?

    • @imadkhaliq2941
      @imadkhaliq2941 2 месяца назад +32

      You are outright lying. The big three do not receive any subsidies. It is called incentives and bailouts. The big difference is when the USA does it, it is called incentives and bailouts which are fair and justified meanwhile when China does it, it's called state sponsored subsidies that are unfair and horrendous. Please learn the difference. Thanks.

    • @yzy8638
      @yzy8638 2 месяца назад

      @@imadkhaliq2941 just like when US invade, its call liberation, when overthrow democracy, its call aid, when they spy, its intelligence, others are espionage

    • @Pestbringer89
      @Pestbringer89 2 месяца назад +2

      ​@@imadkhaliq2941 ups soryy

    • @BSPBuilder
      @BSPBuilder 2 месяца назад +4

      Lack of competition. Chinese people can buy American brand cars right now if they want, as Chinese government do not pick winners while US government effectively banned any Chinese cars on American market and US car makers are winner without any real effort.

    • @badimpulses17
      @badimpulses17 Месяц назад

      ​@@imadkhaliq2941The US bail out failure companies.
      China helps the successful companies.

  • @wheniamfree
    @wheniamfree 2 месяца назад +86

    If subsidy and industrial policy are the reasons why China is ahead, then the US can do the same. But can they? Is there any US government capable of drawing any long term industrial and economic policies? Any one which matches what the world would need 10 to 15 years from now? If you listen to these analysts/reporters, you wonder whether they use their brain to think.

    • @amandagrant4331
      @amandagrant4331 2 месяца назад

      US politicians like to subsidize the military-industrial complex.

    • @PChan-yt4uf
      @PChan-yt4uf 2 месяца назад +10

      The US government has always used subsidies and policies to support its industries. So have almost all governments around the world.
      Did you think China invented such strategies?

    • @coliv2
      @coliv2 2 месяца назад

      Journalists don't use their brain. The whole business of the media is to make people forget what happened yesterday so they cannot reach their own conclusions.

    • @vrealzhou
      @vrealzhou 2 месяца назад +6

      The US government only has 4-8 years term, what the benefit for them to make longer plan and gives the credit to the next president? China planed the EV strategy since 20 years ago step by step.

    • @nulnoh219
      @nulnoh219 2 месяца назад +3

      They only reserve that strategy for defense companies.

  • @deeplearningpartnership
    @deeplearningpartnership 2 месяца назад +104

    Tariffs help no one, including the US.

    • @mrzack888
      @mrzack888 2 месяца назад +5

      Tariffs only help if you are a developing country protecting your new industry. USD is a global reserve currency, makes no sense to put up high tariffs

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 2 месяца назад +7

      You are almost 100% correct but...Tariffs do help to buy votes to keep politicians' job secure. However, it is actually bad if all you do is to impose tariffs over industries that are not competitive. Tariff s then becomes a bandage that hides the true scale of the injury.

    • @lq9734
      @lq9734 2 месяца назад +2

      Helps Mexico!

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 2 месяца назад

      It helps the average American tax payer pay more to the Government so they can send Military Aid to nations to fight wars that have F#$K All to do with the U.S tax payer.
      Trump is a stable genius remember? NOT!!!

  • @thomasrogers9146
    @thomasrogers9146 2 месяца назад +170

    AS AN AMERICAN BUSINESS MAN THIS IS WHAT MAKES ME ANGRY. WHAT THE HELL DO YOU MEAN BY ITS NOT FAIR? OUR LEADERS BELIEVE WE ARE SO EXCEPTIONAL AND DELUSIONAL ENOUGH TO THINK WE ARE ENTITLED TO DOMINATE GLOBAL TRADE AND ECONOMICS WITHOUT DOING THE BLOODY HARD WORK AND INVESTMENTS TO MAKES US COMPETITIVE GLOBALLY.? IF WE CAN NOT COMPETE AND DOMINATE ANY INDUSTRY THEN WE HAVE TO WAGE AN ECONOMIC WAR ON OUR COMPETETORS?. THIS IS A LOSING STRATEGY BECAUSE THE NATIONS THAT ARE GOING TO DOMINATE ECONOMICALLY ARE THE NATIONS THAT INNOVATE AND CREATE VALUE IN THE MARKET PLACE. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION WAS STARTED IN ENGLAND AND IT MADE ENGLAND VERY RICH..WE AMERICANS HAVE DOMINATED INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE LAST 75 YEARS. WE DOMINATED GLOBAL TRADE BECAUSE OF INNOVATION AND BECAME RICH. WE DID THE WORK WE INVESTED IN LARGE GOVERNMENT LEAD INDUSTRIAL POLICIES.. SOME WHERE ALONG THE WAY WE LOST OUR OUR WAY SPENDING TRILLIONS ON ENDLESS USELESS WARS BENEFITTING THE DEFENCE SECTOR WHILE NEGLECTING INFRASTRUCTURE, EDUCATION, IMPROVING THE STANDARD OF LIVING FOR AMERICA'S PEOPLE AND MANUFACTURING. BASES ON WHO IS FILING THE MOST PATENTS CHINA IS AND IS POISED TO DOMINATE GLOBAL TRADE. NO NATION IS ENTITLED TO SUCCESS. THE REST OF THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY IS DISGUSTED WITH OUR WAR ON CHINESE TECHNOLOGY AND CONTAINMENT. THIS IS A LOSING STRATEGY

    • @yeejlilys9742
      @yeejlilys9742 2 месяца назад

      Well done. The US competition with China is more like a 100-meter dash. What the US is doing is to try every trick to trip China, hoping China will fall, break its arms and legs, and finally quit. This is a fantasy. The winning strategy for the US should be running faster.

    • @mpph6102
      @mpph6102 28 дней назад

      Almost everyone outside the US thinks America Sucks.

    • @schan5436
      @schan5436 25 дней назад +3

      Thank God, there are still some level-headed Americans! But sadly not among the politicians.😂

  • @kolviczd6885
    @kolviczd6885 2 месяца назад +75

    China built all types of crazy roads and bridges on impossible mountains and cliffs before the modern technology and engineering even existed. That's just one example of the Chinese. You can slow them down by few years, but that's it, you cant stop them. That country is used to overcoming hard obstacles and making impossible things possible. Not able to produced 3mn chip currently is just a piece of cake for them. Just give them 5 more years with all the restrictions you want in the world, those guys will beat you in the chip game too.

    • @aslampervez2294
      @aslampervez2294 2 месяца назад

      Xiaomi has already designed 3 nm chips. Just google it

  • @vlhc4642
    @vlhc4642 2 месяца назад +49

    China isn't just "leading" in UAV, solar panels, graphene, HSR, EVs and batteries, China has 90% to 99% market share in those technologies, that's not leadership, that's absolute dominance.
    China is leading in the "competitive" column, and competitive in the "behind" column.

    • @coliv2
      @coliv2 2 месяца назад

      you're right, they just started exporting commercial planes.

  • @mrzack888
    @mrzack888 2 месяца назад +65

    The scientists working in american laboratories and research departments many are chinese.

    • @xinyiquan666
      @xinyiquan666 2 месяца назад +24

      more than 80% IEE engineers in US are chinese, more than 65% of US academy of science where top scientists are , is chinese, every 1 out of 5 PhD in US are chinese................. just one quick example, US team for world math olympia , all team members are chinese, including the instructor, who is a professor from University of Chicago

    • @issactian3143
      @issactian3143 2 месяца назад +5

      😅😅 used to be Chinese until Trump started a spy game on then and they move back to China

    • @oki148
      @oki148 2 месяца назад +5

      @@issactian3143 then US started lagging in all fields.

  • @summerchina6568
    @summerchina6568 2 месяца назад +21

    Shame on the US. Instead of getting your act together and compete, you try to deny your competitors from doing their job.

  • @veegtec
    @veegtec 2 месяца назад +59

    We are watching the $1.6bn budgeted right here.

  • @yuanli1379
    @yuanli1379 Месяц назад +13

    A Chinese old tale: Once upon a time, there was an old man named Yu Gong who lived near two large mountains. The mountains blocked the way to his home, making travel difficult. Determined to make life easier for his family, Yu Gong decided to remove the mountains, one shovelful at a time. His neighbors mocked him, saying it was impossible for one man to move two mountains. But Yu Gong replied that even if he could not finish, his children and grandchildren would continue the work until it was done. His perseverance moved the heavens, and eventually, the mountains were taken away. This story teaches the value of determination and persistence.

  • @PhilipTan-i1u
    @PhilipTan-i1u 2 месяца назад +47

    That is not true, China is not behind in commercial aircraft. China has produced the home grown C919 commercial aircraft and the usa and the EU are not cooperating in testing the aircraft for airworthiness certificate to be allowed to fly in North America and Europe. It is a politically based rather than technologically that the C919 does not have the Airworthiness certificate from the American and European aviation agencies.

    • @vestasharp6861
      @vestasharp6861 2 месяца назад +6

      They had to pick one thing, the only one they could find.

    • @joshlim4695
      @joshlim4695 2 месяца назад +3

      They should have picked military ports instead where the US clearly have a few hundreds around the world and China has only one (by invitation of the host country).

    • @olderchin1558
      @olderchin1558 2 месяца назад

      Chinese is still way behind here. It still has to develop the engine, avionics, actuators, landing gears, ...... 60-70% of the parts are western supplied.
      Certification is a matter of time, the C919 use mostly the same parts as the Airbus. If Airbus and Boeing still wants a piece of the China market, they will certify the plane

    • @PhilipTan-i1u
      @PhilipTan-i1u 2 месяца назад +9

      @olderchin1558 the C919 is going to be fitted with the Yangtze river engines as the usa has stopped the delivery of the GE engines. The Yangtze river engines are ready and tested. The domestication rate of the C919 exceeds 90% now as Boeing and Airbus both have not more than 60% domestication rate. So, your argument does not hold here.

    • @saellenx3528
      @saellenx3528 2 месяца назад +1

      ​@@olderchin1558They cant be that far away from Boeing whose doors and engines are falling from the sky.

  • @nguyenbaokhanh2005
    @nguyenbaokhanh2005 2 месяца назад +42

    Truyền thông Mỹ dành quá nhiều thời gian để nói về Trung Quốc, các bạn càng nói thì người ta càng muốn tìm hiểu nhiều hơn về Trung Quốc mà thôi.

    • @amandagrant4331
      @amandagrant4331 2 месяца назад +8

      Losers focus on winners.
      Winners only care about winning.

    • @nguyenbaokhanh2005
      @nguyenbaokhanh2005 2 месяца назад

      ​@@amandagrant4331họ không hiểu rằng họ đang quảng cáo miễn phí cho BYD, Huawei, Dji...càng nói nhiều thì độ nhận diện thương hiệu càng lớn, tôi ở Việt Nam trước đây còn không biết về những thương hiệu này, nhờ các kênh truyền thông của Mỹ không ngừng nói về những thương hiệu này tôi mới biết nó nổi tiếng đến vậy. Truyền thông Mỹ làm toàn những việc ngu ngốc, chính phủ Trung Quốc rất thích các bạn vì đã quảng cáo miến phí cho họ😂😂😂

    • @hanoimuathu123
      @hanoimuathu123 2 месяца назад

      truyền thông bẩn để bôi nhọ trung quốc mà, có tác dụng đấy chứ

  • @jimwong2269
    @jimwong2269 2 месяца назад +38

    Almost all Chinese kids love STEM, including me.

  • @SengpoSatbang
    @SengpoSatbang 2 месяца назад +79

    But but... according to Peter Zeihan, China can only copy existing technology and never lead in anything 🤣

    • @wulfychen3058
      @wulfychen3058 2 месяца назад

      Peter who? Ah the stupid one that can't even count to ten!!

    • @kolviczd6885
      @kolviczd6885 2 месяца назад

      Peter Zeihan is on A.I.C (read backward) payroll...so don't expect anything good from him about China 😉

    • @marktrinidad7650
      @marktrinidad7650 2 месяца назад +15

      I like Zeihan. His stories are music to our ears to us Americans. Its like America being a God controlling puppets here are there to maintain our dominance.

    • @york163
      @york163 2 месяца назад

      Don't forget Gordon Chang, According to him, China has been collapsing for more than 20 years and counting!

    • @mohatomadibo1513
      @mohatomadibo1513 2 месяца назад +18

      He even said China will disappear in ten years when he was on Joe Rogan. Such an idiotic thing to say, and he said it so confidently😂😂😂

  • @waynezw
    @waynezw 2 месяца назад +20

    The US policy makers keep making mistakes. If China was a small country like Cuba, sanctions might work. China is such a large country with 1.4 billion population, sanctions do not work. The only way to win a competition is to better yourself. In a tennis game, you win by your skills, not by ruining others equipment.

    • @accurian0
      @accurian0 2 месяца назад +3

      Yes, you can. Ask Tonya Harding for tips on how to "contain" your competitors.

  • @iany2448
    @iany2448 2 месяца назад +32

    China having a competitive commercial aviation industry is just a matter of time. It took Airbus thirty plus years to get where they are now. China most likely would take less tine to achieve the same.

    • @olderchin1558
      @olderchin1558 2 месяца назад +4

      China will make it here as well. They made the plane today, tomorrow local suppliers will sprout out to flesh out the supply chain.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 2 месяца назад +1

      China's domestic market alone will sustain the production of C919 for years. in a multipolar world, the west (G7+EU) is merely 1/4 of the world or even less.

  • @huas5350
    @huas5350 2 месяца назад +60

    Tech Supremacy Drive? This sounds very american 😅

  • @lyttlebee
    @lyttlebee 2 месяца назад +13

    Containing China is in itself unjustifiable simply because the US fears losing its dominance in the world. Sometimes you have to face the fact that no one can dominate forever. So when it’s your time to let go, just let go.

    • @accurian0
      @accurian0 2 месяца назад

      Unfortunately, the US government officials don't think like you.

  • @lifes_magic_moments
    @lifes_magic_moments 2 месяца назад +25

    A better question… why should the US contain Chinese technologies?

    • @quoc28mytube
      @quoc28mytube 2 месяца назад +2

      Technology comes from science and that based on nature. Why can not we just have fun with tech! Not being so insecure by implementing all these security laws by fear! And with all these security, high officials just used mails instead, that FBI found out.

    • @nmew6926
      @nmew6926 2 месяца назад +1

      Greed

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 2 месяца назад +19

    Those EU countries that voted "yes" to the EV car tariffs either produced no cars or produced far fewer cars.
    This convinced everyone that this is to deindustrialize Germany.
    Not helping workers.

    • @willengel2458
      @willengel2458 2 месяца назад +1

      the script is well written with Scholz the weak as Chancellor, Von der Liar the puppet in EU, the Greenies as Defense and Finance Ministers. Germany will have its "Lost decades" made to order.

  • @rcrinsea
    @rcrinsea 2 месяца назад +22

    Unfair? LOL. What is the 100 quadrillion dollar US military budget? Is that fair?

  • @Gaurav-dv7sr
    @Gaurav-dv7sr 2 месяца назад +37

    Poor America.. Please focus on naughty America 😂😂😂

    • @aslampervez2294
      @aslampervez2294 2 месяца назад +1

      If those r exported it will easily be 200 billion industry

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 2 месяца назад +1

      😅

  • @antihypocrisy8978
    @antihypocrisy8978 2 месяца назад +18

    Wouldn't humanity as a whole benefit from better tech, regardless of origins? This year is one of the hottest Halloweens on record right? We can either learn to live together, or be buried together.

  • @TienyeeTien
    @TienyeeTien Месяц назад +4

    “Contain, sanction, embargo, entity lists” when could the US forget that the Cold War and colonialism is over…..

  • @rizalalejandro1917
    @rizalalejandro1917 2 месяца назад +11

    In China, you can fill the whole area with technical people who know the job. Contrast with US who can barely fill a room. That was aid by Apple CEO

  • @zomplak
    @zomplak 2 месяца назад +14

    when your innovation is tariff and trade barrier you dont need much brain cells

  • @thomasrogers9146
    @thomasrogers9146 2 месяца назад +9

    CHINA JUST TESTED A FULLY AUTONOMOUS SMART ROAD BUILDING ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGY WITH NO HUMAN LABOR..THEY Constructed A 150 KM HIGHWAY WITH NO HUMAN LABOR. THEY ALSO HAVE SMART FACTORIES, SEAPORTS MINERS ALL FULLY AUTONOMOUS.AMERICAN DOCK WORKERS ARE PROTESTING AND THE CHINESE NOW HAVE SHIPPING DOCS WITH NO HUMAN LABOR AND CAN STAY OPEN FOR 24 HOURS.THIS PROGRESS NO ONE CAN STOP.

    • @accurian0
      @accurian0 2 месяца назад +3

      I don't know about road building robot but I did see a video about a port in China that is fully automated with 5G technology. The US port workers demanded less automation so that they don't lose jobs. Hello? This is 21st century. You lose competitive edge if you try to resist the advancement in technology.

  • @meimiaolin2581
    @meimiaolin2581 2 месяца назад +8

    You expect this sort of behavior from kindergarten kids but no, it's the US administration.

  • @faterrorism
    @faterrorism Месяц назад +4

    The United States can contain China, but AT WHAT COST? Let me remind you of the rhetorical headlines often used by Western media

  • @davidk6269
    @davidk6269 2 месяца назад +7

    I strongly recommend that anyone interested in this topic read the ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) Two-Decade Critical Technology Tracker updated on 28 August 2024. This report is funded primarily by the Australian government and previously by the US State Department. This report concludes that China is leading in 57 of 64 critical technologies. Please read the detailed report for an eye-opening analysis of the enormous lead that China has in critical technology fields.

    • @freetorobandloot
      @freetorobandloot Месяц назад

      The usa leads the world in producing lawyers. They are running the country right now. So it is not all bad. 😂

  • @yeejlilys9742
    @yeejlilys9742 2 месяца назад +5

    Come on, if money governments provided is sole factor to advance technologies, then oil rich Gulf states could be countries with highly advanced technologies. Human capital is the most important factor.

  • @MnMPryoBanana
    @MnMPryoBanana 2 месяца назад +4

    Most tech advancement is good for all humanity. Don't contain, just compete

    • @accurian0
      @accurian0 2 месяца назад +1

      Well, tell that to the US government. You'll only get deaf ears.

  • @tingng9569
    @tingng9569 Месяц назад +2

    Simple: Corruption,drugs,alcohol,entitlement and too much pizza.

  • @VWet
    @VWet Месяц назад +1

    Another question is, why isn't the western countries invest in their own infrastructure to match the new eco-friendly industries ? One of the main reasons for BYD's success is the big investment in China's power grid and EV charging facilities, why isn't the western countries doing the same but expect their auto industry remain competitive ???

  • @mtcnew8353
    @mtcnew8353 Месяц назад

    Every government gives out subsidies to their industries but few succeeds. China is the only one that makes great strides in all areas focused. The West says it’s the unfair government policies. But the West should ask themselves why their own subsidies failed. So instead of trying to improve oneself, U.S. uses sanctions to slow down China’s progress.

  • @LandGrabbingIndia
    @LandGrabbingIndia 2 месяца назад +14

    The biggest question would be, "when will USA/Russia/China ever catch up with India"? Bear in mind that it was Narendra Modi, touted as the "most popular leader/Prime Minister of the World" by Indians (India), that proclaimed to the entire world that:
    "The 21st century belongs to India"
    *"India has become a space superpower"*
    “India is today the fastest growing major economy in the world"
    "India is the voice/leader of the global south"
    "India a Vishwaguru (global teacher of the entire world)"
    Indian medias saying "India global tech leader of the world".
    I laugh at the title of this video. 😆🤣😂😁🤭😏

    • @SimonFranck100
      @SimonFranck100 2 месяца назад

      Impossible for the world combined to catch up with India. It will continue to have the world's largest number of illiterates, unemployed, unskilled, homeless, hungry, dispossessed, discriminated. As also the world's largest army of social media trolls who spew hate against anyone who questions the primacy of their Lord and Emperor Modi

    • @issactian3143
      @issactian3143 2 месяца назад +1

      😅....Are you serious, surely not I hope😅😅

    • @LandGrabbingIndia
      @LandGrabbingIndia 2 месяца назад +2

      @@issactian3143 I know that you are jealous of India's achievments. 😏😅😅😅😏

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 2 месяца назад

      @@LandGrabbingIndia Please make better Bollywood movies!

    • @LandGrabbingIndia
      @LandGrabbingIndia 2 месяца назад

      @@4tress300zx We made a real life movie👌
      *Title of article/research/report:*
      Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation 2014 update
      *Global Source:*
      UNICEF
      *What article said specifically:*
      India continues to be the country with the highest number of people (597 million people) practising open defecation (Fig. 17).

  • @zacsino876
    @zacsino876 2 месяца назад +6

    I used to have the battery replaceable Nokia around 2005, idk which model, maybe the steel one 6300 or others because i got several Nokia in a raw at that time, and guess who made those sad ass 800mAh~1000mAh batteries in those phones, it's BYD.
    Now almost 2025, you losers pretend to wonder why they're good at making stuff like advanced lithium battery. Duh!

  • @WalkOverHotCoal
    @WalkOverHotCoal 2 месяца назад +6

    The list is quite reasonable. However, on of the critical items the US is serious lacking is ship building. Here is a snippet from Google....
    ***China's shipbuilding industry has over 230 times the capacity of the US, according to recent estimates from the Office of Naval Intelligence, representing about 50% of the total global shipbuilding capacity***
    While we look at the high tech end of the spectrum, heavy industries such as ship building is probably even more crucial for the US to be dominant...especially in a war with China !!!

    • @amandagrant4331
      @amandagrant4331 2 месяца назад +2

      The best talents in the United States are all engaged in stocks.
      Only those who have been eliminated from the financial industry will go to manufacturing.
      US shipyards have no orders and they don't need to hire more people.

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 2 месяца назад +1

      @@amandagrant4331 I dare say that it is the same in many western societies because "high flying" investment bankers and lawyers get promoted in Hollywood movies as well as in the society. Young folks dropped out of subjects that would lead them to science and technology for more finance-based subjects. The rewards could be so much better in finance in many cases.

  • @pwu8194
    @pwu8194 2 месяца назад +3

    Biden's China policy is like Harvard's Asian admission policy. Harvard can limit the number of Asians at Harvard, but Harvard can't prevent Asians from excelling.
    In 2023, the median household income in the United States varied by race and ethnicity as follows:
    Asian: $112,800
    White, not Hispanic: $89,050
    Hispanic: $65,540
    American Indian and Alaska Native: $57,270
    Black: $56,490
    "Resistance is futile", said Borg in Star Trek.

  • @qingshanyipian1936
    @qingshanyipian1936 2 месяца назад +4

    Subsidies are prevalent in the U.S. and other countries as well. Not only China. Don’t make excuses

  • @happymelon7129
    @happymelon7129 2 месяца назад +6

    Majority semiconductor chip designer in U$ are Chinese and Indian.

  • @fyc55
    @fyc55 2 месяца назад +5

    Work harder by yourself to overtake and not work harder to contain your competitors ! Sullivan is stupid!

  • @samuelk9497
    @samuelk9497 2 месяца назад +1

    When China completes their urbanisation and major civil engineering drives, the government will spend more on science, tech, and research greatly boosting their high tech growth. China could also export their construction expertise to the USA for HSR, architecture, and civil engineering.

  • @bigeye4520
    @bigeye4520 Месяц назад +1

    Tonya Harding knee capping tactic definitely is a US's tried and trued tool.

  • @quoc28mytube
    @quoc28mytube 2 месяца назад +4

    Richest country in the world and claiming unfairness. All those very poor countries that have nothing to start with, that is unfair.

    • @issactian3143
      @issactian3143 2 месяца назад

      😅😅😅..... And Biden said China is cheating.. so the us is not cheating but robbing and force by war

  • @vinucini4341
    @vinucini4341 2 месяца назад +4

    If you know God, he will bless you. God bless China 🇨🇳❤

  • @joshuaeko
    @joshuaeko 2 месяца назад +5

    Unfortunately very narrow US mindset, setback for humanity..😅😅

  • @jiangcui5769
    @jiangcui5769 7 дней назад +1

    That is what happens when you spent 7 -10 trillions on wars across the world in past 25 years while China is spending on high-tech and building infrastructures across the world.

  • @kenyup7936
    @kenyup7936 2 месяца назад +12

    well, I could understand it, back to 80s when Japan dominated world's semiconductor market, US did the same, now the competitor is our country China, history is always repeated . actually none like competitors , it's humanity . Japan has took 30 years for emergency their challenges like economy stagnating, deflation, negative interest rates now China govt did the same, we need to see how many years our country will overcomes our challenges

  • @Anthony-dj4nd
    @Anthony-dj4nd 2 месяца назад +12

    China let America stay #1😢

    • @yehuo2825
      @yehuo2825 2 месяца назад

      china said it many times! china does not want to be #1... they know that if they become #1 in everything china will sooner or later will become like us now... they already said they will maintain their growth...

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 2 месяца назад

      Let them tell their citizens that. Keep America Great!

  • @randall_c_6163
    @randall_c_6163 2 месяца назад +1

    Back when America was strong and had more of a healthy economic growth. America won by out lasting and out growing there competition. Since the economic completion with Japan which saw America force Japan into sign economic concession which ultimately was the tipping point for Japan debt fuel economy. America had been relying on containment instead of outgrowing. Issue now America faces is containment is not working on China like how it did with Japan when Europe essential complied with America. The issue is unlike Japan, China is one of the countries closest to self reliance if push come to shove and the non European market although not as rich as Europe they have gone a long way in development and have yet to maximise there potential economical size. Mean even if America succeed in 100% isolating China that is still not enough not to mention China is the number one trade partner of 90% of the countries in the world and far ahead of America.

    • @yzy8638
      @yzy8638 2 месяца назад

      the actual difference is there is no USA military base next to Beijing, nor a thorough infiltration of CIA in the politic sector and higher up of all the big corporation.

  • @MrRockyyao
    @MrRockyyao 24 дня назад

    If you are better than me, it's unfair. Sounds like my 5 years old.

  • @yojimbo3681
    @yojimbo3681 2 месяца назад

    It's wild to think China is actually competitive in semiconductors when just a few years ago we expected them to be over a decade behind.

  • @Jjirehc
    @Jjirehc Месяц назад

    Doesn't our own government change policies to fund, provide grants etc to encourage certain areas of the economy too?

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 2 месяца назад +1

    how about STOP TRYING TO HANDICAP OTHER COUNTRIES!!!!

  • @edmonyu2327
    @edmonyu2327 Месяц назад

    The west should understand the word contain sounds very nagative too Chinese. China is not a country for you to contain.

  • @willgates8383
    @willgates8383 Месяц назад

    It has nothing to do with military, it’s totally an economic reason to contain China, driven by the U.S. corporations that want to contain Chinas competitiveness and they are also the political campaign funders so the politicians follow whoever pays the piper!!!!

  • @gunsumwong3948
    @gunsumwong3948 2 месяца назад +3

    The miserable faces of these Bloomberg people tell it all.

  • @juergenschmid009
    @juergenschmid009 26 дней назад

    We successfully contained JP, GER, FR. etc, now we believe we can ofc also contain CN. Great mentality.

  • @spacetimemalleable7718
    @spacetimemalleable7718 26 дней назад

    The researcher forgot to mention nuclear technology. Latest report: China is ahead of the U.S. by 10-15 years. The CCP pours huge amounts of money into 4th Gen nuclear reactors and Fusion. If they are the first to commercialize fusion, then the competition is practically over. While the U.S. and the West debates ad nauseam, China has been building infrastructure, Educating it's people, esp in STEM fields, and Investing in technology for decades and decades. There is no way the U.S. can contain China.

  • @silversurfergw
    @silversurfergw 2 месяца назад +1

    US will need to dictate what and how much each country is allowed to buy and sell to China.. It is the rules based order after all. 😂😂

  • @Kamara-oo5dh
    @Kamara-oo5dh 2 месяца назад +1

    10 years later, news title will be : we must contain Viet Nam and India tech supremacy this time. 😂

  • @PutraMing
    @PutraMing 2 месяца назад +5

    😱😱😱😂😂😂❤❤❤WOW GOD BLESS CHINA AND PRESIDENT XI

  • @anonymoushuman8962
    @anonymoushuman8962 2 месяца назад

    My money is on China. It’s inevitable. With the focus and work ethic they have.
    America forget about containing China. Just compete. That’s what you tell the rest of us.

  • @Jjirehc
    @Jjirehc Месяц назад

    We have done unto others what will inevitably return back to us

  • @shuidifengliu
    @shuidifengliu Месяц назад

    US can print money endlessly. If it is so simple, it can play the same game

  • @peteperdur
    @peteperdur 2 месяца назад +1

    Bloomberg intelligence is an oxymoron.

  • @zomgneedaname
    @zomgneedaname Месяц назад

    John deere single handedly responsible for tanking US dominace of tractors and agriculture

  • @DaniEles-rc7ij
    @DaniEles-rc7ij 2 месяца назад +2

    a devastating report... China doesn't lead in airliners because the US wont certify. otherwise, BOEING is not a real competitor long term

    • @turtlesoup8134
      @turtlesoup8134 2 месяца назад +1

      actually, its nothing to do with the certification by the US. China can't even meet the domestic demand. Ramping up aircraft production is very difficult, especially civilian aircraft where there is zero tolerance for any accidents. Once domestic demand is met, then China will slowly revoke boeing and airbus certification, starting with the small planes like the 737 and a321. There will be the day when we need to transfer flight just to change to a certified aircraft flying back and forth from the west and China (and probably russia too in the near future).

    • @DaniEles-rc7ij
      @DaniEles-rc7ij 2 месяца назад

      @@turtlesoup8134 I think our point of view is similar.. i think you and I differ on the timeline..

  • @wynetsang
    @wynetsang Месяц назад

    Science and Civilisation in China (1954-present) is an ongoing series of books about the history of science and technology in China published by Cambridge University Press. It was initiated and edited by British historian Joseph Needham (1900-1995). China has several thousand years of tech experience while the West only has several hundred years since the end of the Dark Age.

  • @LumystArts
    @LumystArts Месяц назад

    No one knew about SMIC a year ago.
    Youll be surprised whats in store in a year

    • @kamsunleong6648
      @kamsunleong6648 Месяц назад

      I didn't know BYD existed until their evs started appearing on our roads 2 years ago.

  • @a55tech
    @a55tech Месяц назад +1

    boeing giving international aircraft makers a big assist lol

  • @samuelk9497
    @samuelk9497 2 месяца назад

    Hmm, US aircrafts involve and involved government military spending namely Boeing during ww2 and still has loads of government military funding, and Lockheed Martin a private corporation is majority government funded. US taxpayers get milked hard and the workers get underpaid.

  • @unreliablenarrator6649
    @unreliablenarrator6649 Месяц назад

    Chinese can think for themselves. The idea that China depends on the USA for everything reflects a colonialist mind-set at odds with reality. It is past time for the West to join the modern world and start treating Asians as equal partners. Does the USA have something to offer China? Can you work as partners for a win-win where you are not always in the control position (or imagine you are)? What do you gain by withholding technology? Want to isolate the USA from a market of 1.4 Bn people who are increasingly middle class? Your decision to make, Where will that get you?

  • @ponuni
    @ponuni 2 месяца назад +8

    the yellow man is high iq and hard working.

  • @matthewgaddy3232
    @matthewgaddy3232 2 месяца назад

    The ELEPHANT in the room here is that China's 'socialism with Chinese characteristics' has enabled its government to nationalize critical sectors, bringing all major corporations under central control. Additionally, their $2 billion daily trade surplus from trading with 140 countries significantly strengthens their position.

  • @redmondduhina9400
    @redmondduhina9400 2 месяца назад

    China work hard to avoid america and eu sanction.being independent can avoid trouble in the future against america.And it's happening now

  • @teebone2157
    @teebone2157 2 месяца назад

    China is the global leader in ship building as well

  • @lttml6039
    @lttml6039 23 дня назад

    China China China 😂 USa is scared shit of China

  • @eng80425
    @eng80425 2 месяца назад

    why in the world do you think it is even morale or right for one country to try to limit or control how another country grow? Can other country then be allowed to say USA you cannot develop this or that?

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 2 месяца назад

    I don't think that the industrial policy of any country work since market force will determine what are needed by consumers.

    • @yzy8638
      @yzy8638 2 месяца назад

      lets said consumer need phone
      so the corporation invest in phone
      so all the suppliers of components (wire, metal casing, LED, etc) of phone pop up
      BUT, its cheap to just import, than spend billions in R&D to build up core components, like chip or operating system
      than to avoid being cut off and hold throat, government decided that if you do R&D, they gonna give you tax cuts...
      taking that incentives, also for PR purpose, since your hostile enemy is oppressing you with sanctions, you also get boosted image among your own citizen.
      ofc its dont always work, if your people are too lazy to work for it.

  • @TomEdwardi
    @TomEdwardi 2 месяца назад +1

    !!I just switched up my Roth IRA to 50% SCHD, 25% SCHX, 25% SCHG, and my Roth 401k is 70% vanguard S&P 500 index, 20% vanguard growth index, and 10% vanguard international index. Seeking best possible ways to grow $350k into $2m+ before retirement

    • @YevaSonia
      @YevaSonia 2 месяца назад

      As a newbie investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
      Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.

    • @JoseLopez-lf9rw
      @JoseLopez-lf9rw 2 месяца назад

      I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.

    • @YevaSonia
      @YevaSonia 2 месяца назад

      I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of
      information can be a big hurdle. I've been
      making more than $200k passively by just
      investing through an advisor, and I don't have
      to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my
      finances remain secure. So I really don't blame
      people who panic.

    • @JoseLopez-lf9rw
      @JoseLopez-lf9rw 2 месяца назад

      Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.

    • @TomEdwardi
      @TomEdwardi 2 месяца назад

      how would you recommend i enter the crypto market? I am also looking at studying some traders and copying their strategy rather than investing myself and losing money emotionally. What's your take on this approach? and How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?

  • @midniteking1
    @midniteking1 2 месяца назад

    All we do is debate,argue with no solutions and move on to the next trending topic!Remember,no matter which side win,the other side already decided to take down in all costs to get elected!

  • @klarkewang
    @klarkewang 2 месяца назад

    it happened many times before. now the new gamer is CHYNA, different than all the previous, 'table overthrower'

  • @keirenle
    @keirenle 2 месяца назад +1

    Seems like China overcapacity is almost every fronts except aircraft carrier.

  • @QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj
    @QiuQiuChannel-ni3xj 27 дней назад

    For decades USA gets their tech experts from overseas countries and when they stop coming...... 😗

  • @KashmirParadise786
    @KashmirParadise786 2 месяца назад

    Western n European countries are Dying in their own EGO N JEALOUSY, SO DISGUSTING n So Pathetic for them All.

  • @urimtefiki226
    @urimtefiki226 2 месяца назад

    You can contain (isolate) Urim Tefiki not China. China has 1.4 billion people.

  • @RanjeethMD
    @RanjeethMD 2 месяца назад +1

    Because US companies are busy playing politics within the company. 😂😂😂 G.O.T

  • @brandonderrick006
    @brandonderrick006 21 день назад

    The stock market tells us all who’s winning.

  • @AbidHussain-ik4bd
    @AbidHussain-ik4bd 7 дней назад

    How boring it looks on the faces of propagandists to cry 24*7 about another country