Craig McLachlan's acquittal shows there are 'no winners' when it comes to allegations: Murray
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 дек 2020
- Sky News host Paul Murray says Craig McLachlan’s acquittal shows that “nobody wins” out of legal processes.
“People who made accusations who ultimate feel the system didn’t stand up for them and the person who have been put through the wringer ultimately to be exonerated by the system,” he said.
"Nobody wins out of processes like this."
Mr Murray proposed a system where in cases like sexual assault, the names are withheld until a verdict is reached as both accused and accuser have their reputations tainted by the allegations.
“People make their judgements based on what they have read on the front page of the newspaper that always screams the accusation louder than the exoneration.”
The accused should not be publicly named unless proven guilty. Innocent until proven guilty otherwise the accused can be tainted for a long time.
But they still could be found guilty due to lies.
It is not an even playing field. The accusers does not have pay a dime. They have the police and the OPP looking after them for free. The defendant has to pay hundreds of thousands to defend himself.
Absolutely spot on, especially when you are looked upon as guilty, until you prove your innocence, rather than innocent until proven guilty. It doesnt just end there either. All the others involved in the case are NOT allowed to corroborate the case outside the courts, yet the judge,the lawyer and the prosecutor can talk about it over a beer or two or twenty or even can strategize the case for a result rather than impose justice. thats when your wealth is tested on how influential your mouth piece is over those long beer drinking sessions. if you somehow ended upwith a legal aid lawyer, fresh out of school, then there is 2 chances of winning the case, and they are out of business, Buckleys and Nunn...the justice system need to be "cleansed".
@Anthony Marks lol you must be a youngen : ) Buckleys & Nunn were an Australian owned and operated department store chain that were against multinationals and always refused there big offers for their stores and decided to sell to Grace Bros which were again an Australian owned company but not long after Grace Bros were gobbled up by some corporation when they fell to hard times and it all happened in a reasonably short period where the Aussie icon of Buckleys and Nunn were the two chances that we will ever have them trading in Oz again cause they were out of business, hence the saying of two chances of that is buckleys and nunn and they are out of business was a familiar idiom for a couple of decades at least from late 60`s to the late 80`s..
@@beklerken1 thanks for that! good comment
@Anthony Marks Awesome comment! I never knew who Buckley was or that he was even Australian. Funny coz I was setting up a stall at the markets the other day and after looking at my work realised that it was what my old man would've called a Heath Robinson construction. Who the hell was Heath Robinson I wonder? I'll look it up some day.
@Anthony Marks thank you cobber for informing me of that trivia, very much appreciated. I humbly apologise for taking you for a youngen but my comment had no ill will and again im sorry if it sounded that way. Its always good to know or learn in my case lol the truth of the Australiana stories to pass on to the younger generations. Especially of the innocence and the sincerity of the pre Whitlam years how Australia was truly the " lucky country" When we as kids in Sydney actually looked up to our policeman with with high esteem in the early 70's because they would teach and train us at the "police citizens boys club" all kinds of sports at the communal centre in Meredith St Bankstown North and would quite often join in with us at Graf Park for a kick of the footy or a hit at the nets at tip and run. I cant get my head around how on earth this great country of ours came to where we are at with Chairman Andrews. But i am doing all i can to claim back my country from these corporate cartel gangs that masquerade as politicians in the foot steps and wisdom of uncle Wayne Glew from Geraldton WA (please look him up on YT) im one of the awakened ones and quite often on here commenting and spreading the good word of our supreme law book , the A ustralian constitution, the original 1008 page one and not the fake, condensed version of what the politicians make the ignorant ones beleive the fake re print is the real constitution ... lol any way nice to have met you, may your god bless you. 🙏🏻
The "me-too" brigade still ruined his career and cost hundreds of thousands in legal fees, so mission accomplished. Rush , Jarret - same outcome.
There is a constant winner of every human misery - solicitors & barristers, ( & the media, due to popular observation )
so resonant, well said. they are the very reason of the justice systems degeneration, corrosion and toxicity in conjunction with the politicians, that majority of them have the law background.
Read my response please
Carpe, Judges also benefit/elevated in more frequently sitting in judgement over Their fellow humans.
@WWG1WGA its the flawed and corrupt system that allows them or encourages them to do what they have done. prevention is always better than cure as the saying goes.
we are under the laws of the sea and the UCC with the current system that puts profit before anything, just take a look at the family courts and the amount of misery it can cause to human lives and livelihoods and most heart breaking part is the suffering of the children.
common law needs to be re instated in our judicial system.
@@beklerken1 Correct, when you fold in Union organisers (not actual industry workers) you almost have a full deck with the Joker becoming the Premier or Prime Minister
3 years of stress and lawyers fees, not something you would want.
Yet it costs nothing for the accuser. If they loose the case, on with life they go.
@@undefinedfreedom8580 in the UK they get their £12k comp regardless of the outcome.
@@julie5271 shit... i should go tot he UK and accuse someone.. make a career out of it
I do not claim this to be the case here, but I find it interesting that so many women have brought allegations against successful people, while so few have brought allegations against people with lower profiles, could it be that there's not enough money to be had from the less successful people? Just wondering.
Because they don’t get the attention by accusing low profile people
Spot on
I wonder if the medias amplification of ' public profiles' has a part to play....profits vs ethics.
Do you even read what you write/ Obviously you wouldn't hear about low profile accusations.
IMHO - only after a person is found guilty should their names be revealed.
I could get behind that. But once convicted should ALWAYS be public
I agree but it’s going to be harder to keep a celebrity’s name quiet. There will always be someone wanting to make a quick buck at their expense.
@@waynesworld7804 so punish premature leakers
Hope he sues the accusers fo deformation, slander, costs and more, they have ruined his life and no-one deserves that
The name of a minor isn't reported partly to ensure that the individual is not burdened for the rest if his or her life.
Should adults that may ultimately be proven not guilty be similarly burdened.
You made a damned good point.
Well that’s pretty awesome for him ...!!! Wish him all the best for the future... !!! 😀✅
ABC journalists and producers "coached" women what to say when they made allegations against actor Craig McLachlan.
yea iv seen that..
All the women involved against him need to be sued, and pay for damages. Its evil .
FALSE ACCUSATIONS THAT GET THROWN OUT SHOULD RESULT IN THE ACCUSER GETTING EITHER THE PENALTY OR THE ACCUSATION.
There was a case here in the U.S. where a woman who accused a college acquaintance of rape. He was convicted, with no DNA, no evidence whatsoever. After many years in prison (I believe it was 5) she came forward and admitted she made it all up. The prosecutor then filed charges against her. She was convicted of filing a false police report, lying under oath, and some other charges. She was convicted but his life was forever ruined. No amount of money, public apologies, news coverage, or even expunging his record can make up for what he went through.
I dont believe the accusations were thrown out. There was a trial. The case was heard and he was acquitted.
I have argued this point before it is said the accused must be named because other potential victims may recognise him and thus come forward.
But equally why not name the accuser so she maybe recognised by other men she potentially made false claims of sexual assault or rape against .
Or name neither party and let the legal process take its course.
She has been named and alot of people have come forward and said she was well known for this sort of behavior.
Good. Now get back to that quality work you do Craig in theatre. You are a superb actor.
And there are many innocent stars in gaol ... but the accusers go to the media first.
Best news I've heard all week ! Congratulations Dr Blake ✌
andrew gibson and the ABC immediately cancelled that great show because of an allegation. It’s disgusting. The ABC assumed he was guilty. I hope he got a good payout from breach of contract or something. Not to mention all the people who worked on that show.
I love that show
So glad to see Craig was not found guilty on any charges, i always thought he was a great guy with a good sense of humour.
Do you know him personally, are you on a first name basis with him, do you get an invite for a BBQ? FFS
You are literally so stupid it would give someone a stroke
The judge even acknowledged he did what he was accused of,she said he was lucky the consent laws changed after his offenses took place
@@creditelectric And DO YOU know him personally??? Of course you bloody well don't.
@@renzy5270 She did nothing of the sort. The charges were dismissed through lack of evidence so how could she say for a fact that he did them? BULL!
Feminism vs Terrorism, the similarities are shocking! Responses to both should be equally similar!
Yes..when Feminism morphed into Terrorism....this is the hell trip of our daily existence now...the woke principle...so delusory....
@Bite Me
Feminism has probably gone a bit to far more like it,
The idea is very basic, Equality in the work place, eqaul pay for women doing the same job in the work place as a man,
Also equal opportunities in the work place,
It's all been blown out of proportion this day and age
Well done Craig!!! I thought for sure he was innocent. I never bought it for a second.
Judge wins the prosecutor wins the attorney win it's all about money
The persons making the false allegations should be made to serve the jail time of those they are accusing these crimes of, on their release we should go after them and made to pay compensation for ruining their careers and reputation.
Women who are engaged in criminal sexual behaviour never delay reporting it. It is done immediately.
Change my mind.
Now Ü No how true!
Good, sue the absolute life out of ALL the accusers and the prosecution. And prosecute the accusers.
@Phil Allison ?
To sue them you must be willing another few hundreds of thousands of dollars just to fight against all the public services, including the police and the OPP.
I think you & others should read the assessment of the Magistrate Wallington before sprouting too much.
@@creditelectric why?
@@bretloyd8097 As I've said before to others, I am not your researcher.It is available for all to see.
Heard about this from Gary Orsum. Always felt that Craig was innocent & thankfully I was right!! Best of luck to him in his future.
The Rocky Horror show girls , not Mary Poppins , toughen up .
Ask an Australian firearms owner what it's like when a person (like a wife or ex-wife or ex-girlfriend) cries "WOLF!" on them & they lose their firearms for 10 years or forever.... Even after it was proven to be a false-WOLF!
didnt even need guns for that to happen , they just say it anyway
And god help if go m c licence “I think he having mental problems officer 👮♀️ you but that in your report”
i hear you loud and clear and i wasnt a gun owner ( i do however support gun owners ). i had the book thrown at me but lucky for me the judge and cops were on my side and seen through the bs
Regardless of how much money people have, falsely accusing someone of something like this has a huge effect on their life. They can get fired, lose friends, have family turn their backs on them, b kicked out of clubs and religious organizations, etc...All this can happen within 24 hours of the accusation and the vast majority of the damage is irreversible. Hopefully, the accused has a solid support system. I hope the people who do this face serious jail time.
It's a case of " tall poppy syndrome". Craig McLachlan had it all- a great career, proven talent: he was truly a star. His accusers have
blown his behaviour behind the scenes out of all proportion and destroyed his reputation and prospects of future employment as an entertainer. I hope that Craig McLachlan finds his way out of this trauma and gets back on the stage where he belongs.
Let's start the conversation with the accuser going to the authorities at the time of the offence...Not years after the fact. Maybe you could have saved someone or multiple victims from what you allegedly went through.
Wrong, it takes a lot of courage to bring a case like this.I know what I witnessed in a classroom as a kid, the perpetrator is now behind bars following multiple charges brought 20-30 years later after the act.You are indulging in classic victim blaming.The assessment of Magistrate Wallington should be taken into account.
@@creditelectric - There still has to be proof for a conviction.
The female judge was not impartial in her summary of barrister and the discussion she made sure some mud stuck!
I & many others watched & listened & saw the post court case interview in the street then read the assessment by the Magistrate the following morning, a lot remains to be seen.Watch this space I think.
Absolutely disgusting what this poor man and his family went through. The lies of these pathetic women and ABC putting words into reporting is unacceptable and ALL THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AND CHARGED. I HOPE THE REPORTERS OF ABC AND THE 3 WOMEN LOSE EVERYTHING AND KARMA PAYS THEM BIG TIME.
When the Justice system itself is flawed by commercialising in allowing the Uniform Commercial Code to blur lines and muddy the waters, so to speak, innocence will be muddied and blurred naturally. You cannot get justice in this country without having a QC or a very expensive legal team in your corner anymore is the ugly truth......
" _In England, justice is open to all, like the Ritz hotel._ ”
―attributed to Sir James Mathew (1830-1908).
So pleased Channel 7 aired Craig & Nessy's interview. That says a lot!!!
Craigs partner should be Australian of the year..A woman standing by her man through thick and thin gives us some hope. The scum ABC journalists need to hang there heads in shame. But only lawyers, solicitors and journalists win in today’s society. The judge needs to shut her cake hole. The jury found him innocent. Just because a judge and a couple of stupid journalists believed them doesn’t mean they told the truth. All judges in this country need to be quiet after a trial. The victims on both sides and the jury have the final say. Our judges let scum out on the streets every day and take no responsibility for their actions but want to vindicate supposed victims who have been proven to have fabricated the truth.
I watched that too. Have you noticed there's a double standard? Why are women allowed to act towards people in a way that men get into trouble for. Plus those women that made allegations against him were coached on what to say.
What seriously bothers me is the blatant coaching and agenda from the ABC. I’ve always championed the ABC for it’s supposed neutrality. No more. That image is well and truly shattered.
@@redreuben5260 I sent a support message for Craig and Vanessa, and pointed out that sometimes there's a double standard, women are allowed to touch and snog anyone they want and noone says a thing, its seen as harmless, but men get in trouble for everything, many things get misinterpreted. It should be about truth and justice not gender, I put this in my comment 2 days ago , but U Tube deleted my comments.
I also pointed out as you have that the women were coached as what to say on the ABC. Someone working for U Tube didn't like what I wrote and deleted both of my comments.
I definitely agree with anonymity for the accused. In the U.K. only the complainer gets it, everyone should be treated the same
it's just as bad for those who have been charged and dragged through the courts only to have the prosecutors drop the charges due to lack of evidence. The presumption by the public is that you are guilty because they lacked evidence. I would ague that not having your day in court is worse as the crazy allegations are never challenged and remain in the public's mind
My son was falsley accused of rape. He was treated as guilty from the get go until the Jury returned a unanimous acquittal of all charges. 9 years have passed since then and I am still furious about the way he was treated especially when the police recorded in their logs that they believed the accusations were false and malicious but did nothing to try to get to the bottom of why the accuser made the allegations up in the first place. As for the local paper, their reporter came to Court on first day of trial to hear the prosecution's opening statement and then printed a version of it on the front page as though it were a new Gospel! On the day he was acquitted they salaciously rehashed all of the untrue allegations as fact then acknowledged at the very end of their column that he was in fact aquitted. The Jury stated they disbelieved his accuser and thought the lack of evidence against my son and evidence provided by the police medical officer also supported him.
My son was literally prosecuted based on his accuser's word and her word only. It's beyond parody and I still have moments of rage when I think about it, even after all this time!!
My hope is that from now on those who want their 15 minutes of fame at the expense of someone else really look at the repercussion that awaits them
Jeffery Rush
John Jarret
and now
Craig McLachlan have stood in their truth and won the legal battle to clear their names- but may never work again because winning the battle was not enough.
SUPPORT CRAIG. The geolous 4 female co-stars used the Australian tall poppy syndrome to their advantage. These women should be put out of work FOR GOOD.
Craig & Nessy are absolutely lovely & my heart goes out to them big time!!!
Good on you Craig & Nessy. All the smart people LOVE YOU BOTH.
False accusers should face whatever sentence they were trying to bring against their victim.
I'm not famous or rich so why aren't I being accused by multiple appellants?
If the assumption this doesn’t happen if you’re not famous then it’s wrong. Non-famous cases just don’t get publicised. Go down to your local Magistrate’s Court, pick any day and any courtroom and listen to case after case.
@@AlexSmith-gr4hp well I had a crazed methhead stalker attack me with a baseball bat and dog, then cry rape after I disarmed and subdued her till police arrived. It was her 3rd attempt and the police wouldn't confiscate the baseball bat.
Point is why did all the 'victims' in this case wait so long then all bring cases simultaneously?
Vinny Bologna This started in an odd year. It was a sexism year. Racism is every even year. all the female actors were calling their agents, "book me a metoo story darling!". Careers were being made on metoo victimhood at the time. But not all of them were that creative. No need, just read the paper, pick up the gist of the accusation and say something similar. That's how the celebrities play.
For guys like you and me, it's a private affair. Only people who don't know you well think you're garbage. It's a 6 month wait and numerous court appearances whereby you're treated like garbage from everybody in the system, you don't get to have your say except as means to trap you into saying something that can be twisted as evidence against you. You're pressured into accepting guilt because it will cost you less financially but you want justice so you stay the course until you finally get a lonely day in court. Here it's a lottery, lucky if you get a sympathetic cop prosecutor or an idealogue, lucky if you get a sympathetic judge or an idealogue. You sit around and wait until your accuser has that crazy moment, the one where everybody knows there's screws loose. Then feel that massive shift in the atmosphere whereby presumption of guilt switches to realisation of innocence. But it's not sympathy, not even shame, just a realisation. Then you get kicked out of court, no apologies, no feelings of justice, no closure. Relief but no justice. Just your legal bills and months of your life you can't get back. You'll see your accuser treated with sympathy and kid's gloves, likely having used state paid free representation. Your job is to go home and wait for the emotional roller coaster to hit you and try to get on with your life. It's important you process those emotions too so you can avoid the PTSD and learn to trust people again.
Yeah dude, I've been there.
@@AlexSmith-gr4hp did I mention I've been divorced twice and accused of most every heinous act and had my children used and turned against me?
But I've moved on and remained optomistic regardless and recently had a date with a woman who paid for dinner!!
Vinny Bologna Free dinner. Sounds like a keeper 😛
this is why we have law courts ...to sort out the media who think they are the judge ,jury and executioner
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'd like to see Craig take back his role as Dr. Blake in The Blake Mysteries. Also, I would like to say that I am always just amazed at how it is even possible to bring back old accusations and charge someone. If you were that messed up by the supposed incident, why didn't you report it right after it happened? What about Statute of Limitations? It's CRAZY
the lawyers always win...
They need to have a law that if the person is found not guilty that he/she can take the accusers to court for damages.
#womenlietoo
Of course he was acquitted. No person with even half a brain would have believed those vicious lies that were concocted - why? - because he was successful and they were jealous.
Or they have attention seeking tendencies
The Creepy people that accused Craig,should be publicly named and shamed,they were jealous of him and they need to get a life,someone please name them.
And in other news Tara Reide isn't the only whistleblower now LOL!
the accused should now be named to be sure that they dont do it again it was ok for craig to be shamed
Their careers are fine, his- not so much
# me too go away
"Trust in the law" often means "deeper pockets"
3:32 I wouldn’t say Rebel Wilson’s case has damaged her reputation and made it harder for her to get work. Since the case, she has starred in The Hustle, Jojo Rabbit and Cats
It's seems to be different for women..
It like how the left claim that only white males can be racist..
They don't think that females can sexually harras or worse people...
So they will help a female with such accusations no matter the proof while they will destroy a male based on a tweet...
She's never off the tv in UK!!!
@@zakofrx - exactly.
Cats would be the most damaging...
Women who falsely accuse & damage a persons reputation so maliciously should go to jail.
I just had doritos and hot salsa. Now I don't want to poo
You're full of it.
If a formal risk assessment was performed about these cases whereby the accusations about a person were made public, and these may well carry some substance. The person being accused, if it's made public will no doubt carry the burden in the public sphere. If the person is proved guilty, then the legal system has done its job however; if the person is found not guilty by a court of law, through its jury of peers, then nobody wins. The accusers are placed in a position of being considered as potential liars whilst the person judged as innocent has a "stain" against their name for future work or relationships. The only winners out of this are the legal teams. They charge exorbitant fees AND who is to say that they don't recommend to the accuser that they should take this to court and that they will win the case? The other scenario is that the accuser just wants to treat the situation to "teach" the other party a lesson. I say; be careful what you wish for because it may backfire and everyone is a loser apart from the Lawyers. Risk assessment is based on Likelihood versus Consequence. If the likelihood is high, the consequence will be swift and lawful. If the Likelihood is low, the consequence may continue to be high, not only for the Accused but also for the Accuser. Moral of the story? Think twice before making accusations and consider your own response rather than some Legal Eagle advising you that you will win from this.
Magistrate Wallington's assessment is far more revealing.
That Magistrate SHOULD BE SACKED. SHE HAS THE TOUNGE OF A SNAKE!!!
TONGUE
Would like to see Mr Craig Mclachlan be written back into the Dr Blake Series but would also like to see him have a body guard so that he can never be accused again.
Those evil nut jobs need to go to prison and pay his lawyer fees court fees etc. Tax payers are paying for court costs. They need to pay!
false accusation are horrible and people who do that deserve the worst imo, im extremely lucky im not in jail, all it takes is 1 disgruntled "friend"
this is why i dont do "friends" anymore, i dont do "socializing" i just hate people so so oh so much
the only way to protect yourself is to treat every other human in your life like a rabid animal that only cares about destroying you, if you dont give them exactly what they want
Shouldn't false accusers be sentenced to perjury at the very least!?
There should be a law whereby a routine investigation of accusers should take place following acquittal of the accused . If there is enough evidence from that investigation to suggest that the accusers lied in their allegations , criminal charges should be then laid against them . There are those that would argue as has been the case that accusers will be afraid to come forward if they may be subject to an investigation themselves in the future should their accusations not stand up in court . Well , that is , simply , too fucking bad ! No one has the right to use the law as a means of a personal vendetta . It is a complete abuse of justice that wastes the time of many and costs the taxpayer a fortune . Do we have police time and court time to waste on false accusations ? Hell no ! If they accusers are found to have lied and acted with malice , they must be made to pay .
And why does it take years for the cases to be heard? That's years out of the innocent they can never get back. What about a compensation Trust Fund to reimbursement monies for lawyers fees and lost income? Until then, they may as well be guilty as charged.
The most common presumption is where’s there’s smoke there’s fire
They will probably launch a civil suit now
Problem is unfortunately if innocent, mud sticks. Makes life a little harder
Anyone know what his legal bill came to?
3 years of hell, this shows weaponising women’s rights is incredibly destructive. It also shows media outlets can twist the story, and the real bullies get away with it. This happens every day.
His Documentary made me cry, We are praying for him and his family.
A witch hunt used to consist of a woman being dunked in a pond
These days it's a man being falsely accused by a bitter #MeToo coven
Not to mention that some women touch and kiss and flirt with people without their consent, women often get away with behaviour that men get into serious trouble for. Why doesn't a woman get charged with assault for grabbing and snogging someone without their consent. Why is there such a double standard.
I am very scared for men today especially the successful ones Jealousy is a curse
What if a man is an employee (or a boss) in a small business, or even a government department, and some other employees who do not like him, get together and make accusations of sexual assault. The man (usually a man) is then charged and has to hire lawyers to defend himself. Unlike actors who are better off financially than most of us, that man has to sell his house, to fund a defence; he is likely sacked or suspended from his job; financial stress leads to a broken marriage; and if hopefully he is found innocent the stain is still there. There is no recompense for that man and quite possibly employment or promotion is going to be hard to come by. Where is the justice?
Let’s prosecute the accusers
Hope he goes back to work soon. He was at his best when this happened. Three very talented actors mentioned in this commentary. A waste of potential. Maybe accusers will think twice if the case is flimsy.
Don't keep ex girlfiends around your new life. Woman can be vicious when scorned!!!
They just lay in wait for the pounce. I'd love to knock that ex so called friend of Craig's lights out.
I thought at the time these girls were in that show .It would be quite easy to accidentally touch them if hand slipped.They Shouldn’t have been in that sort of show if they were shy.Craig puts his all in all his shows
@James Stewart That’s awful. A female colleague of mine got a sexual harassment warning because she touched a male staff member on the arm.
Theres a free pint of Guinness in Ireland for him if he ever visits :)
'wait until found guilty / not guilty - verdicts delivered'. Name/s withheld until??
I disagree legal representatives win. Dr Blake was one of the few TV shows I enjoyed. Hope they bring it back now. Also more Harrow too.
He gets acquitted but not hey dad,🤔
Make the law equal, not a pay to win system . The courts in Australia have always been a joke . Kangaroo court is a global term . Make the courts tax funded for everyone . Use the cigarettes money . Or make the law that governs us understandable to every one ,not just lawyers . The forms and bullshit are insane .
Lock up the false accusers .
Obviously his QC was mates with the judge.
Have a read of Magistrate Wallington's assessment.
These women should go to jail.
Time For Mr McLachlan to start suing all those Losers for ALL of The Money
Mediation to hold accuser's accountabilty in front of Friends + Family?
At least he knows who his accusers are and what was said about him. When Karmein Chan was abducted, the police and media called on the public to nominate a suspect and offered a huge reward to pick the right one. 27'000 men were named (including myself) Of these 73 were charged with an offence (not connected to the case) 73 in 27'000 works out to 1 man charged per 370 men named. An anonymous person wrote to police saying I should be investigated. Police contacted my work. I are not even allowed to know what was said about me. People spend hours reading what happens to famous people but no one cares what happened to me. But if anyone wanted to read my story google innuendo test blog.
There must have been something in it or it wouldn't have gone to court
NOT GUILTY,IT SHOWS,WHAT KIND OF KANGAROO COURT,IS THE AUSTRALIAN LEGAL SYSTEM.IS THAT A SURPRISE?
"Twitter will scream, bitch, and moan". We welcome you into the based department.
Good for him, absolute acquittal.
We need to understand that under the matriarchy that, if you haven't realized it yet, we are now living in, justice is no longer a case of innocent till proven guilty. Indeed under a matriarchy, you are guilty when you are accused of being guilty by a member of the matriarchy! To be a member you must be born a woman, there are some other lesser classes who are given some status according to the intersectional matrix.
Spot on. you are on the whim of the complainants statement/ accusation without their accusations being proven authentic or investigated by police to be true. I was caught in that situation when my sister tried assaulting my 88 year old frail mother and i stepped in just in the nick of time to hold and subdue my sister from hurting mum and after getting a mouthful from mum she was disgruntled with me for holding her back and while doing so she sustained minor bruising. she went to. a police station with the bruises claiming that i assaulted her. even after arresting me in cuffs, taken to a police station and explaining the situation and making my statement, what ever my sister claimed stood and the cops did not give a hoot to resolve anything or even to get mums statement and talked to me, treated me like a criminal. I have educated my self in the law for some time when this occurred and took a few simple procedural steps, filed a fine detailed statements on stat decs from myself and my mom with the public records, my case was dismissed without even getting to court. I then questioned there the police involved about the little comment stated under your signature on statement sheets of lying will lead to perjury charges and asked if my sister will be charged for perjury since it was proven that she lied. they were not interested in the slightest. and i left it at that but put in a complaint of the investigating officer (M.Young 4244 const.) of breaching an investigation without due course, besides a whole lot of BS mails of excuses of the cops failngs nothing ever came of it. the whole system is based on processing cases purely for profit. corrupt to the core.
That's certain the way it seems these days.
Modern feminists are vile, nasty disgusting bitches ! Nothing to do with helping women or girls , it’s about hating men and trying to destroy them
I totally agree, the person that tries to accuse should have to pay Craig's costs. I felt he was innocent. He is just not the type to do what he as accused of.
he seems like a great guy but was a bit flirtatious.. they should leave him alone now..
That's what I wrote. The cast were flirting with him too, but he got the blame. I asked why there is a double standard, but both my comments were deleted by U Tube.
Is he the guy who played Henry in Neighbours? Back in the 90s?
He had 4 women that acuss him him not 1 but 4 im guessing there was more that didn't come forward. He reminds me of team America, careful,she is acting. But what the judge said was more revealing if it happened after a law change it would be different. As a man you have to be so careful when working around the opposite sex.
That is what happens in the real world. We will never know. God only knows and maybe they are yet to be judged ❓
WE ALL KNOW CRAIG IS INNOCENT. ALL THE SMART PEOPLE ANYWAY!
It’s got nothing to do with money for the accused. Let these innocent men take courage in Johnny Depps case.
Shame on these money hungry lying women. They make TRUE victims of domestic abuse or sexual abuse embarrassed.
Carry on with your heads held high John and Craig. 💜💜