1. You admitted at least twice that Mustache man was a socialist who primarily wanted to build a socialist system based on racial identity to socialize people or "volk". 2. Marx was deeply antisemtic and racist. He spoke about it frequently especially in "The Jewish Question". 3. One can be a socialist without being a Marxist or a Fascist.
@@arandomlemon6707 Totalitarianism has many forms. Mustache man was a socialist who wanted to socialize the people based on race not class. Read a book about third positionists. Also read Marx's "The J* Question"
"take socialism from the socialists" basically Hitler changed the meaning of the word socialist which got his party support among the working class. Hitler invented the myth of socialism meaning a powerful state
Why are racism and socialism mutually exclusive? He was a socialist and a racist and to suggest that these two ideologies cant exist hand in hand is ridiculous.
@Ivar the Homeless Only if you trust Hitler to define your terms for you. Don't you think it's possible that Hitler didn't know what the fuck he was talking about? Or that he could have been just straight up lying? Like the way he told the German people they were winning the war right up until he killed himself and the allies rolled into Berlin?
“But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.” Hitler
@@JasonManners Anti-communism is one of the key ideological foundations of Fascism and Nazism, and Hitler made that perfectly clear. Hitler wanted to completely eradicate Communism, seeing it as one of the major threats of the world. Fun fact, Hitler often used "Marxism" and "bolshivism" and "communism" interchangeably as evidenced by mein kampf.
@@drewce390same way Lenin wanted the so-called mensheviks destroyed, and sent to gulags all the so-called essers, who disagreed with bolsheviks. Same way Stalin sent to gulags the trockists. Left multiplies by division, like every primitive organism. And then the offspring fights each orher with passion. Nothing unusual in socialist hitler fighting communism. In fact its a very natural thing for every branch of leftism.
socialism when it fails it was not because socialism and since never has worked yet, technically never existed. The question is how many times should we try ?
@@henrymudgett2646 that is right, anyone that believes in socialism is an idiot, it can't be confusing if it attracts people. is it the sweet lollies that look good that attract people, doesn't sound like hard work, the government will take care of you and everything. Come hither young lad and give me your soul. Does it really make a difference what sort of socialism is doing the attracting , making the promises.
The opposite of communism and socialism isn't fascism or Nazism, as most people seem to assume. All those ideologies in practice were related as they were collectivist where the state was everything, so they were fundamentally leftist. The opposite of all of them are limited government and individualism, or right wing American conservatism.
+Oppressed White Guy possibly this is true, but Hitler didn't see it quite like that. He saw statism as useful as long as it furthered racial goals, the moment the state was no longer any use in these terms he was capable of creating parallel non state institutions (most of the infrastructure of Nazism, camps, SS etc were party as opposed to state institutions). You are right in assuming that he viewed the individual as irrelevant, but his collectivism was based around notions of race, building the Vokksgemeinschaft or 'People's Community'. His imprisonment of democratic socialists and communists in 1933 was down to his fear of their electoral popularity but also because they were a challenge to his planned racial transformation of Germany to prepare it for another war.
I'm not gonna pretend to know a ton about Hitler's personal ideological beliefs, but I think he was much more of a nationalist than a white supremist. I mean he did believe Germans were the master race, which is racism, but I dont think he thought that white people in general were. Needless to say he went on a white people killing spree, aka WW2, to fulfill his vision of a supremely powerful, independent Germany. Anyway, at least to me, on the outside, it seems Nazism has a lot more in common with leftism in general than with what is considered right wing today, which is conservatism. If you have more videos regarding this subject, I'll check them out when I get off work. Cheers.
I never understood why Hitler invaded Russia. Especially when he did. They had a treaty and I cant imagine why Russia would have broken the treaty. I know many of his generals were against the idea, too.
The Nazi where though. Because they where no more socialist than North Korea is a capitalist country. It's not what you call yourself it what you do. The Nazi's gave favored treatment to corporations and corporations supported them (including US ones). That is the very definition of the opposite of socialist. Also the Catholic Church supported them. They celebrated Hitlers birthday and helped Nazi's escape when they began to lose the war. I'm not talking some local brake off branch either. I'm talking about the Vatican.
Yes because American conservationists are totally against the state starting wars or controlling reproductive behaviour of its citizens among numerous other things...
Hitlers policies definitely had socialist elements. He effectively nationalised the means of production. Which is typically a socialist thing to do. And with regards to his policies for 'real Germans', that was definitely quite egalitarian stuff. He combined socialist elements with the toxic idea of social Darwinism, in which the weakest in society should be destroyed in order to become egalitarian, or Ubermenschen. You could say that the Nazi's made use of identity politics based on a victim mentality, just as the left usually does. The Nazi's set up the German welfare state, introduced child benefits, protections for workers, they constructed big projects which kept many people in jobs, Nazism was clearly an attempt to get rid of the class society that existed before, just as socialists aimed to do. The difference was the race theories and social darwinism that socialism does not have (although, in the UK many socialists propagated eugenics, which shows that race theories, or superiority theories are not mutually exclusive from the concept of socialism, but alas). The Nazi's were in favor of a state that interfered quite deeply into the personal lives of their citizens, something socialism also favours. The Nazi's had a system of price control, and whilst there technically was free enterprise, all free enterprise had to follow the diktats by the Reichswirtschaftsministerium, the State Department of Economics. Hitler also stresses the importance of trade unions in Mein Kampf, which sounds pretty socialist to me. Hitler also copied many aspects of the Marxist rule from the Soviet Union. A one party system for instance. And when attacking the Soviet Union, Hitler mentioned in his private sphere that they will bring the 'real socialism' to Russia. Many opponents of Hitler were actually on the right, they complained that Nazism was Communism in disguise. Members of the communists are known to have joined Hitler after their party was forbidden by him. Nazism did compare themselves with Russia in the beginning, the German professional classes preferred ‘Brown Bolshevism’ to the Red version, adding ‘There have been no massacres and everything takes place in a progressive well-organised manner’. Hitler had also very good ties with Soviet Russia, the Molotov von Ribbentrop Pact, and after Poland was conquered, the red army and the nazi's had victory parades together (e..g in Brest Litovsk), German warships were allowed to use Russian naval bases and the Germans shared aircraft designs with the Russians. This friendliness of course ended when Hitler got the idea of invading Russia (this mistake ultimately saved Europe). So what you can conclude is that the lack of respect for property rights (socialism), all kinds of social policies (welfare state, child benefits, price controls, effective state control over the means of production) combined with racist views (nazism) has led to the toxic brand of Nazism. Both Nazism and Socialism are utopian in their very nature. So if you want to suggest that Hitler was not someone with a lot of socialist elements in his ideology, I would suggest that you go back to history classes or read some books. P.s. Nazi's in that time were actually described as beef's. Brown from the outside, but red from the inside. Hitler also applied for the SDP, the social democratic party. They refused him. P.s. If people argue that socialism is bad because Hitler was a socialist, they violated Godwin's law.
This is so much more informative than the original video which simply claimed that one cannot be both racist and socialist and one can not be racist socialist so one must be racist AND NOT SOCIALIST (are you stupid)
helpful comments are never this long. stop trying to associate you folks' worst historical example with our ideologies. the fact that youre trying so hard to dissociate from historical fascists just proves what a shitty ideology it is
Nazi literally means national socialist. Hitler gives a playbook on propaganda and brainwashing the masses on a large scale, which the Democrats have done exactly with Hitler's identity politics.
By defintion he was a socialist, a National Socialist at that. You cannot be an advocate for centralized planning and strong government controls without being a socialist. That's what made Hitler a socialist. He may have been to the right from the Bolsheviks, but he was still a socialist leftist as he believed in strong central government control. Hitler outright declared himself a socialist in Mein Kampf, just not the Marxist international or full Soviet type. He struggled with HOW to distinguish his socialism from the rest of the Marxist crowd.
I like to cut through all the ideologically motivated equivocating and special pleading about the supposedly Righteous use of the holy word 'socialism' to try to carefully exempt this or that authoritarian mob we do or don't like who describe their ideology themsleves as 'socialist', by instead looking at collectivism. (By the way, I don't see how it's possible to hold that radical individualism is any less ridiculous than collectivism). Then we can get to the particular imaginary identity groups (and their reification as mystical 'spirits' or 'essences') of each ideological family and each ideology instance in question, and the associated historical mythological and grand destiny nonsense built around it.
Propaganda from pro socialist people that need to distance themselves from that socialist party. Socialism is not necessarily defined as internationalist. Hitler's priority of race does not mean he isn't socialist. Modern day socialists also often prioritize race, just not necessarily their own.
@@adamnicholes1002 We prioritize people who contribute to society over commie rat fucks that burn the country down, and think they have the right to free shit off the backs of people who are productive. You had free money for a year. That not enough?
@@phantasmo9998 Sir, I am a school custodian. I worked the entire pandemic. Want to take your tone and shove it up you know where. You misinformed idiots, make me laugh. Working will not take you to being wealthy. It will only keep you poor. Until we a system in place thst caters to the working class. We are just slaves. Get thst through your head.
You are saying that Hitler is not a socialist because he was a socialist to the Germans and not a socialist to the foreigners. I agree this is why he’s called a national socialist and not just a socialist.
In america democrats are the racists. That's all they talk about is race. They are segregating white people from black people. They tell the black people they are oppressed..they are doing everything hitler says to do in his book. Nazi literally means national socialist.
In Gemany: you are German or you are not. In USSR: you are communist or you are not. There is no difference. Both regimes were bad just different circumstances - different outcomes, but conclusion is the same extreme socialism is terrifying.
yeah, I don't know what he is blabbering about with socialism being internationalist and all that. I live in socialist Denmark and we have one of the more restrictive immigration systems in the world. of course the Danish welfare system is for Danes, how else could socialism work????
"Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear - socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism." Adolf Hitler "Why We Are Anti-Semites", August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. "There comes a time when it will be obvious that socialism can only be carried out accompanied by nationalism and antisemitism." Adolf Hitler "Why We Are Anti-Semites", August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus. "If we are socialists, then we must definitely be anti-semites-and the opposite, in that case, is Materialism and Mammonism, which we seek to oppose… How, as a socialist, can you not be an anti-semite?" Adolf Hitler, quoted in Hitler: Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen 1905-1924
How as a socialist can you be anti-semite? The man is clearly using a platform here, which is obvious. You have on one side, clear hatred...on the other, you need to redeem yourself, so you say you are totally for the people...a so called socialist
Fascism is a far-right ideology. Socialism is leftist. The closest thing you can get to a socialist fascist is a national bolschevik, AKA a nazbol. Hitler was not one of those. Please, explain to me how an authoritarian, culturally far right, economically right ideology (fascism) is leftist.
@@abudgie6909 Your confusing socialism with a party.... Socialism can be far right as well as far left... Its a form of political and economic ideology. He essentially used a racial based socialist system.
@@yeabuddy1610 if you mean the definition based on classic italian fascism, that’s true. Nazism is similar, but not the same ideology. Although I get the feeling that’s not what you mean. Nazism belongs to the extremist far-right authoritarian group of ideologies most people refer to as fascism. Edit: if your argument is that the nazis were socialists because they called themselves socialists, I’d like to introduce you to the Democratic People’s Republic of (North) Korea. Gonna put that out there to preliminarily deflect any bullshit
@@abudgie6909 Not only did they call themselves socialists, but they also were socialists in practice. Just because they are not Marxist communists, doesn’t mean they’re not socialists. The idea of socialism predates Marxism. There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that the Nazis were indeed socialists, and their ideology manifested itself in reality slightly differently than that of the communists, but the differences are fewer that you might think. If you want to learn more about this, I suggest TIK’s video “Hitler’s socialism” here on RUclips. He cites over 107 sources, all of which are listed in the description of his video. I own many the physical copies of his sources for myself to read, some of the best being “The Vampire Economy” by G. Reimann, “Hitler’s Beneficiaries” by Götz Aly, among others.
That's a very poor argument, only because he is nationalist and racist don't mean he isn't socialist, it is actually in the name of his own political party... He implemented social safety programs, beetle was created for that, and he actually build a cruise ship to the force by joy program, he have the control over the private companies and can nacionalize if they don't cooperate... One thing we know for sure, he is not a capitalist... But all of that are socialist measures, because he miss 2 points don't place him in the right wing... But is not the modern view of socialism, he only be placed in the right wing because the pressure of URSS that don't want Nazism being classified as left ... And actually by definition the real extreme right are the monarchy...
You keep saying "socialist" this and "socialist" that. He wasn't a *socialist* he was a *National Socialist*. He believed that Germany was for the German people - the PEOPLE - which is the very definition of National Socialism. He wanted (and for the most part succeeded) to have 1 race, 1 religion, and 1 creed to unite all Germany (including parts that had been given away after the First World War) after the devastation caused by WW1 and the Armistice that was signed. I'm not condoning his actions, but he was what defined National Socialism - Someone fighting for the rights, wealth, and land of the indigenous people to reclaim their own country from foreign nationals and to ensure jobs go to the German people first.
marx, lenin, trotsky, mao's advisors, hitler's enemies were all hebrew, and among them were all communists/socialists, hitler despised marxian socialism and many times clarified them in his speeches. i am not a leftist, and when someone compares this extremely right wing ideology [natsoc], it hurts my brain because it is intellectually dishonest.
@@ChristopherWood3606 Did Himmler have non German SS units? Yes. But he saw them as inferior to the German race, they were more like cannon fodder to preserve the "superior" Aryan units from dying, not to mention that they believed that while these foreign units weren't Aryan, they had a bit of aryanness in them and can join the SS. Tikhistory made an excellent video on the matter titled "insane reason why Himmler had non german ss units" Or smt like that, just search up tikhistory himmler and it should pop up, rly suggest u watch it.
@@bakiro_1638 what "German race"? What has being German got to do with speaking an "Aryan" (Indo-European) language, other than German is ONE Indo-European language?
I hate when people say socialism includes egalitarianism (or some equivalent). This is simply an excuse to say, "That's not socialism" every time we point out socialism failing. If you're going to play that game, then "Capitalism is a system that promotes a free market, one that is free from corruption." Any corruption you find means, by definition, it's not capitalism! Hitler was a socialist. Deal with it. That doesn't mean all forms of socialism are bad. Any economic system can fail depending on numerous factors.
I won't stoop to the level of the author and call someone who doesn't believe like I do stupid. But the author does seem to be trying really hard to convince us the that Socialism comes in acceptable and un-acceptable flavors. As if to say a National socialist is wrong but socialism bent on destroying another form of economics and governance and world dominance is right. To be fair he doesn't come out and say that. But he really does seem to want to split hairs to try to distance the two.
Same could be said for American capitalism. We have become an imperialistic machine for capitalism. Even throwing our citizens under the train. Creating wars, for corporations. Subjecting other countries to living in squalor so we may buy our goods from them cheaper. If you think we don't, look around you. Also read War is a Racket by Smedley Butler. He brings up the Military Industrial Complex. He died in the 1920's and was a Major General of the USMC.
@@adamnicholes1002 Uh yeah, nope you're off course. Not sure what you were trying to reply to me with. You brought up old gimlet eye, who strangely ran as a prohibitionist and voted for a SOCIALIST for president 1936. He pretty much spouts socialist ideals, and {pushes class division, warfare) then actually campaigns against FDR (a pretty socialistic president upon review). but of course, while doing that, he was almost convinced to throw in his lot with people who also din;t like FDR, instead, because of their social and economic standing, he labels them fascist, Yeah, I kinda know about Gimlet eye, be careful of internet articles that label him "most decorated Marine" or most decorated vet, which is not to take anything at all away from him.
The only difference between the two is that national socialism was based around the German people or the national race while Marxist socialism is based around workers. Those are about the biggest differences I found with a few other exceptions.
We can always tell somebody’s losing an argument because they resort to personal attacks- like the author of this video. Socialism is defined as the state ownership or control of the means of production and the Nazis had officers at virtually every corporation telling them how much should we do some way to produce it. This is very similar to Chinese Socialism currently. Hitler’s addition to Mussolini’s fascism was to interject the issue of race, but historically socialist from the utopian socialist to the utilitarians were all very racist
I get your point that socialisme is secondary and the race and the country is primary. So yes Hitler was nazist and that differ from socialist. But that is really the only differnce. Even Karl Marx is racist since he hate jews because jews praise money and jews dont praise God. So you can't really say that Karl Marx is a socialist?
trying to pretend like one of the most notorious historical examples of fascism (far right nationalism) was in fact socialism (left wing democracy) is perpetuating harmful misinformation. if people think the left caused the genocide in germany they will be more likely to repeat the mistakes of 20th century fascism/conservatism.
3:00 Actually yes they are to some extent there are other variants of socialism because Hitler's form of socialism was one variant. But in the case of Marxism Karl Marx saw history as a struggle between classes hence the difference in Marxist socialism. But all you really said in this video was that Hitler was racist and therefore he couldn't be a socialist. All the information I've gathered Hitler stated that he committed the Holocaust because the Jews were selfish and that they would destroy the socialist Utopia he wanted to build (very basic summary guy was kind of a nut). If he wasn't a socialist why did he kill all those people are you saying he didn't or are you saying he was just racist because he was racist?
Hitler believed that in removing "Jewishness" and socialism, the entire class system would fall apart, thus uniting the German people into 1 ruling class
in no way in this video do you actually state how hiylers socialism wasn't actually socialism. his racial politics and the nationalistic outlook of hitlers Germany really have nothing to so with anything. by the way mousollini was also a socialist.
+Crashcoursemedia thanks for your rather incoherent thoughts. I am not inclined to take lessons in history from someone who is incapable of actually spelling Hitler and Mussolini correctly.
Hitler hated capitalism dude.... the right thrives through private enterprise. The 3rd reich constituted a massive centralized state entity, how is that right wing???
Lmao, this is how modern lefties like Nick here argue; by condescending to peoples valid points. You don't seem inclined to defend your weak arguments. Not surprising.
@@beneficent2557 dude the nazis whole thing was that they hated socialism. that was their thing years before they even started thinking about jewish people. they are antithetical to each other.
@@phillrollannd1436 China is not socialist. Companies can not have non-collective ownership in socialism, therefore both China and Nazi Germany were not socialist.
The key word is nationalist (strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations) in this case the nation of allegedly superior ethnically german people over their Jewish and communist neighbors domestic and abroad. An intrinsically racist hierarchical society is antithetical to the democratic ideal socialism represents. The word was incorporated into the name of their political party to attract working class voters.
@@taylormerriweather2824 what you say you represent and what you do are two different things. Even the Liberals were conservatives in Hitlers time. Today they stole the name but are the least Liberal people we ever had. The liberals are now exactly like Hitler. Divide and control.
@@JasonManners you’re just talking out of your ass bud, do some basic research. Try starting with the nazi page of Google or something, education is a beautiful thing.
“All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.” - March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day This was Hitler
@WTW 142 ok, rephrase for your sake, what the NAZI "Nationalist Sozialismus" did was socialist, you can't escape it, it was state control of everything, big government etc. that is Socialism, government control of the individual. Most socialism ends up being some form of dictatorship or fascism if you like.
@@JasonManners he literally put socialists and communists in camps socialism at the time was partly popular in germany at the time he used this to gain extra support socialism is a transitionary period between capitalism and communism how in any way is that what hitler was aiming to achieve
@@zx8848 I wouldn't be able to change your mind, you have it already made up. I could give you all the evidence but you would deny it so we will just have to agree to disagree. There are so many quotes and proof he loved socialism and hated capitalism but people still do and hear what they tell you without using logic or reasoning. Feelings only are stronger than logic if you let them be. I guess most people can easily be tricked and are too stubborn to open their mind.
@@JasonManners no seriously provide me with some quotes of hitler praising the ideology that he put people in death camps for believing in watch three arrows a actual germans video on this he explains what im trying to
Stalin was a Bolshevik, Mussolini was a Socialist until he was kicked out the party after returning from war, he utilized Fascism as an opposite to Socialism.
@@Semtex_1992"To-day you hate me, because in your heart of hearts you still love me, because.... [Interrupted by crowd] But you have not seen the last of me! Twelve years of my party life are, or ought to be, a sufficient guarantee of my faith in Socialism. Socialism is something which takes root in the heart. What divides me from you now is not a small dispute, but a great question over which the whole of Socialism is divided"
Thank you for this video. People are so ignorant and scared of the word socialism. There is nothing socialist about Nazis, it's fairly obvious to anyone who actually bothered to read Karl Marx.
Hitler's form of socialism did not follow Karl Marx. He did not believe in the nationalizing of private property.. However he was a race based socialist. This was a different form of socialism. It was a competing form of socialism
You have to stop focusing on your own opinions and learn about human history It’s never emotion, it’s only data and human history. When you blink your eyes before you talk it’s you brain storming and that’s when your emotion kicks in. Not worth listening to
In Gemany: you are German or you are not. In USSR: you are communist or you are not. There is no difference. Both regimes were bad just different circumstances - different outcomes, but conclusion is the same extreme socialism is terrifying.
1. You admitted at least twice that Mustache man was a socialist who primarily wanted to build a socialist system based on racial identity to socialize people or "volk".
2. Marx was deeply antisemtic and racist. He spoke about it frequently especially in "The Jewish Question".
3. One can be a socialist without being a Marxist or a Fascist.
1) that's totalitarianism and ethnic supremacy which is at complete odds with the worker's collective
2) Marx was a J himself
3) fair enough
@@arandomlemon6707 Totalitarianism has many forms. Mustache man was a socialist who wanted to socialize the people based on race not class. Read a book about third positionists.
Also read Marx's "The J* Question"
@@matt291 Marx was a jay himself
@@swires1He didn't consider himself one. Read his book about the j question.
@@matt291 Does not matter. If I claim I don't consider myself human, but instead a fruit, does that make me an orange? Or a banana?
If only Hitler wrote a book explaining why he loved socialism why it was linked to his racism and why he believes it works. 🧐🧐🤔🤔
Yes, if only, however, he wrote Mein Kampf and Der Zweit Buch, neither of which say anything of the sort.
@@Explaininghistory Big oof.
"take socialism from the socialists" basically Hitler changed the meaning of the word socialist which got his party support among the working class. Hitler invented the myth of socialism meaning a powerful state
@@Explaininghistory yeah thats objectively false
did you even read it?
@@-videogamedong-3971 ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
Why are racism and socialism mutually exclusive? He was a socialist and a racist and to suggest that these two ideologies cant exist hand in hand is ridiculous.
@Ivar the Homeless thank you for this Quote !
Move on by, nothing to see here. The whole question has been solved by a four minute side swipe.
@Ivar the Homeless
Only if you trust Hitler to define your terms for you.
Don't you think it's possible that Hitler didn't know what the fuck he was talking about?
Or that he could have been just straight up lying?
Like the way he told the German people they were winning the war right up until he killed himself and the allies rolled into Berlin?
How can you have an egalitarian democratic society with structural racism involved? The two are in contradiction of one another.
@@sorzin2289 exactly
“But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.” Hitler
The guy who wanted to destroy communism said that?
@@drewce390 do you have a time when he said he wanted to destroy communism?
@@JasonManners Anti-communism is one of the key ideological foundations of Fascism and Nazism, and Hitler made that perfectly clear. Hitler wanted to completely eradicate Communism, seeing it as one of the major threats of the world. Fun fact, Hitler often used "Marxism" and "bolshivism" and "communism" interchangeably as evidenced by mein kampf.
@@drewce390 He wanted to destroy Jewish bolshivism.
@@drewce390same way Lenin wanted the so-called mensheviks destroyed, and sent to gulags all the so-called essers, who disagreed with bolsheviks. Same way Stalin sent to gulags the trockists. Left multiplies by division, like every primitive organism. And then the offspring fights each orher with passion. Nothing unusual in socialist hitler fighting communism. In fact its a very natural thing for every branch of leftism.
socialism when it fails it was not because socialism
and since never has worked yet,
technically never existed.
The question is how many times should we try ?
Answer: zero
Denmark is Socialist, they're doing fine.
HE was a national socialist! He said he was a socialist. He disagreed with Marxist socialism...
The guy is committing the no true Scotsman fallacy for the sake of his ideology. Seems like a thing Hitler would do.
He also invaded the Soviet Union, and killed communists within their borders and areas of control.
@@henrymudgett2646 that is because he believed his form of socialism was superior.
@@phillrollannd1436 It’s because he was an idiot, who also believed that the confused messaging would attract more people to the party.
@@henrymudgett2646 that is right, anyone that believes in socialism is an idiot, it can't be confusing if it attracts people. is it the sweet lollies that look good that attract people, doesn't sound like hard work, the government will take care of you and everything. Come hither young lad and give me your soul. Does it really make a difference what sort of socialism is doing the attracting , making the promises.
“Hitlers not a socialist here’s why!” Proceeds to explain why he’s not a communist…
Marxists hate the fact that there are non Marxian flavors of socialism.
How to make a title that makes everybody hate you
..and unsubscribe.. It looks like someone made him do it, maybe is blackmail or maybe he just lost a bet
The opposite of communism and socialism isn't fascism or Nazism, as most people seem to assume. All those ideologies in practice were related as they were collectivist where the state was everything, so they were fundamentally leftist. The opposite of all of them are limited government and individualism, or right wing American conservatism.
+Oppressed White Guy possibly this is true, but Hitler didn't see it quite like that. He saw statism as useful as long as it furthered racial goals, the moment the state was no longer any use in these terms he was capable of creating parallel non state institutions (most of the infrastructure of Nazism, camps, SS etc were party as opposed to state institutions). You are right in assuming that he viewed the individual as irrelevant, but his collectivism was based around notions of race, building the Vokksgemeinschaft or 'People's Community'. His imprisonment of democratic socialists and communists in 1933 was down to his fear of their electoral popularity but also because they were a challenge to his planned racial transformation of Germany to prepare it for another war.
I'm not gonna pretend to know a ton about Hitler's personal ideological beliefs, but I think he was much more of a nationalist than a white supremist. I mean he did believe Germans were the master race, which is racism, but I dont think he thought that white people in general were. Needless to say he went on a white people killing spree, aka WW2, to fulfill his vision of a supremely powerful, independent Germany. Anyway, at least to me, on the outside, it seems Nazism has a lot more in common with leftism in general than with what is considered right wing today, which is conservatism. If you have more videos regarding this subject, I'll check them out when I get off work. Cheers.
I never understood why Hitler invaded Russia. Especially when he did. They had a treaty and I cant imagine why Russia would have broken the treaty. I know many of his generals were against the idea, too.
The Nazi where though. Because they where no more socialist than North Korea is a capitalist country. It's not what you call yourself it what you do.
The Nazi's gave favored treatment to corporations and corporations supported them (including US ones). That is the very definition of the opposite of socialist.
Also the Catholic Church supported them. They celebrated Hitlers birthday and helped Nazi's escape when they began to lose the war. I'm not talking some local brake off branch either. I'm talking about the Vatican.
Yes because American conservationists are totally against the state starting wars or controlling reproductive behaviour of its citizens among numerous other things...
Hitlers policies definitely had socialist elements. He effectively nationalised the means of production. Which is typically a socialist thing to do. And with regards to his policies for 'real Germans', that was definitely quite egalitarian stuff. He combined socialist elements with the toxic idea of social Darwinism, in which the weakest in society should be destroyed in order to become egalitarian, or Ubermenschen. You could say that the Nazi's made use of identity politics based on a victim mentality, just as the left usually does. The Nazi's set up the German welfare state, introduced child benefits, protections for workers, they constructed big projects which kept many people in jobs,
Nazism was clearly an attempt to get rid of the class society that existed before, just as socialists aimed to do. The difference was the race theories and social darwinism that socialism does not have (although, in the UK many socialists propagated eugenics, which shows that race theories, or superiority theories are not mutually exclusive from the concept of socialism, but alas). The Nazi's were in favor of a state that interfered quite deeply into the personal lives of their citizens, something socialism also favours. The Nazi's had a system of price control, and whilst there technically was free enterprise, all free enterprise had to follow the diktats by the Reichswirtschaftsministerium, the State Department of Economics. Hitler also stresses the importance of trade unions in Mein Kampf, which sounds pretty socialist to me. Hitler also copied many aspects of the Marxist rule from the Soviet Union. A one party system for instance. And when attacking the Soviet Union, Hitler mentioned in his private sphere that they will bring the 'real socialism' to Russia. Many opponents of Hitler were actually on the right, they complained that Nazism was Communism in disguise. Members of the communists are known to have joined Hitler after their party was forbidden by him. Nazism did compare themselves with Russia in the beginning, the German professional classes preferred ‘Brown Bolshevism’ to the Red version, adding ‘There have been no massacres and everything takes place in a progressive well-organised manner’. Hitler had also very good ties with Soviet Russia, the Molotov von Ribbentrop Pact, and after Poland was conquered, the red army and the nazi's had victory parades together (e..g in Brest Litovsk), German warships were allowed to use Russian naval bases and the Germans shared aircraft designs with the Russians. This friendliness of course ended when Hitler got the idea of invading Russia (this mistake ultimately saved Europe).
So what you can conclude is that the lack of respect for property rights (socialism), all kinds of social policies (welfare state, child benefits, price controls, effective state control over the means of production) combined with racist views (nazism) has led to the toxic brand of Nazism. Both Nazism and Socialism are utopian in their very nature. So if you want to suggest that Hitler was not someone with a lot of socialist elements in his ideology, I would suggest that you go back to history classes or read some books.
P.s. Nazi's in that time were actually described as beef's. Brown from the outside, but red from the inside. Hitler also applied for the SDP, the social democratic party. They refused him.
P.s. If people argue that socialism is bad because Hitler was a socialist, they violated Godwin's law.
This is so much more informative than the original video which simply claimed that one cannot be both racist and socialist and one can not be racist socialist so one must be racist AND NOT SOCIALIST (are you stupid)
helpful comments are never this long. stop trying to associate you folks' worst historical example with our ideologies. the fact that youre trying so hard to dissociate from historical fascists just proves what a shitty ideology it is
You have a wild imagination. And you need to be educated
Nazi literally means national socialist. Hitler gives a playbook on propaganda and brainwashing the masses on a large scale, which the Democrats have done exactly with Hitler's identity politics.
You mean re-educated, don't you comrade?
People in here saying Hitler was a Socialist are the same people who claim to be a Capitalist.
thank god no one takes your stupidity seriously.
By defintion he was a socialist, a National Socialist at that. You cannot be an advocate for centralized planning and strong government controls without being a socialist. That's what made Hitler a socialist. He may have been to the right from the Bolsheviks, but he was still a socialist leftist as he believed in strong central government control. Hitler outright declared himself a socialist in Mein Kampf, just not the Marxist international or full Soviet type. He struggled with HOW to distinguish his socialism from the rest of the Marxist crowd.
I like to cut through all the ideologically motivated equivocating and special pleading about the supposedly Righteous use of the holy word 'socialism' to try to carefully exempt this or that authoritarian mob we do or don't like who describe their ideology themsleves as 'socialist', by instead looking at collectivism. (By the way, I don't see how it's possible to hold that radical individualism is any less ridiculous than collectivism). Then we can get to the particular imaginary identity groups (and their reification as mystical 'spirits' or 'essences') of each ideological family and each ideology instance in question, and the associated historical mythological and grand destiny nonsense built around it.
Propaganda from pro socialist people that need to distance themselves from that socialist party.
Socialism is not necessarily defined as internationalist. Hitler's priority of race does not mean he isn't socialist. Modern day socialists also often prioritize race, just not necessarily their own.
Capitalists prioritize the wealthy over themselves.
@@adamnicholes1002 We prioritize people who contribute to society over commie rat fucks that burn the country down, and think they have the right to free shit off the backs of people who are productive.
You had free money for a year. That not enough?
@@phantasmo9998 Sir, I am a school custodian. I worked the entire pandemic. Want to take your tone and shove it up you know where. You misinformed idiots, make me laugh. Working will not take you to being wealthy. It will only keep you poor. Until we a system in place thst caters to the working class. We are just slaves. Get thst through your head.
@@adamnicholes1002 lol, you are a slave because you are a socialist..
You are saying that Hitler is not a socialist because he was a socialist to the Germans and not a socialist to the foreigners. I agree this is why he’s called a national socialist and not just a socialist.
He got the whole race thing from Darwin. The idea that you can't be socialist and racist at the same time is just idiotic.
Hitler still wasn't socialist. He was a right-winger
@@rockinresurrection6542 wrong
@@rockinresurrection6542 Fascism mandates state control of industry. That's not a right-wing position. That's a left-wing ideology.
H0uston Stuart Ch@mberla.n
In america democrats are the racists. That's all they talk about is race. They are segregating white people from black people. They tell the black people they are oppressed..they are doing everything hitler says to do in his book. Nazi literally means national socialist.
"my socialist utopia doesn't include racism" is a really profound way of putting it.
That explains why leftist activists are promoting segregation and racial division😂
In Gemany: you are German or you are not. In USSR: you are communist or you are not. There is no difference. Both regimes were bad just different circumstances - different outcomes, but conclusion is the same extreme socialism is terrifying.
yeah, I don't know what he is blabbering about with socialism being internationalist and all that. I live in socialist Denmark and we have one of the more restrictive immigration systems in the world. of course the Danish welfare system is for Danes, how else could socialism work????
@@AvgustGeorgi but Denmark isn't socialist it has a welfare system but the market is still run by private individuals not the government.
Socialism in general is terrible
"Thus we can see the two great differences between races: Aryanism means ethical perception of work and that which we today so often hear - socialism, community spirit, common good before own good. Jewry means egoistic attitude to work and thereby mammonism and materialism, the opposite of socialism."
Adolf Hitler "Why We Are Anti-Semites", August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus.
"There comes a time when it will be obvious that socialism can only be carried out accompanied by nationalism and antisemitism."
Adolf Hitler "Why We Are Anti-Semites", August 15, 1920 speech in Munich at the Hofbräuhaus.
"If we are socialists, then we must definitely be anti-semites-and the opposite, in that case, is Materialism and Mammonism, which we seek to oppose… How, as a socialist, can you not be an anti-semite?"
Adolf Hitler, quoted in Hitler: Sämtliche Aufzeichnungen 1905-1924
How as a socialist can you be anti-semite? The man is clearly using a platform here, which is obvious. You have on one side, clear hatred...on the other, you need to redeem yourself, so you say you are totally for the people...a so called socialist
@@aestheticpaw8399 Marx was an anti-semite as well.
@@aestheticpaw8399 How as a socialist can you be an ant-Witness? How as a socialist you can be intolerant toward the intolerant?
@@aestheticpaw8399even in the Soviet Union it was considered bad to be a Jew at times
Saying that fascism isn't socialism is like saying maoism wasn't communism or stalinism for that matter
Fascism is a far-right ideology. Socialism is leftist. The closest thing you can get to a socialist fascist is a national bolschevik, AKA a nazbol. Hitler was not one of those. Please, explain to me how an authoritarian, culturally far right, economically right ideology (fascism) is leftist.
@@abudgie6909 Your confusing socialism with a party.... Socialism can be far right as well as far left... Its a form of political and economic ideology. He essentially used a racial based socialist system.
@@abudgie6909 National socialism is not fascism.
@@yeabuddy1610 if you mean the definition based on classic italian fascism, that’s true. Nazism is similar, but not the same ideology. Although I get the feeling that’s not what you mean. Nazism belongs to the extremist far-right authoritarian group of ideologies most people refer to as fascism. Edit: if your argument is that the nazis were socialists because they called themselves socialists, I’d like to introduce you to the Democratic People’s Republic of (North) Korea. Gonna put that out there to preliminarily deflect any bullshit
@@abudgie6909 Not only did they call themselves socialists, but they also were socialists in practice. Just because they are not Marxist communists, doesn’t mean they’re not socialists. The idea of socialism predates Marxism.
There’s plenty of evidence to suggest that the Nazis were indeed socialists, and their ideology manifested itself in reality slightly differently than that of the communists, but the differences are fewer that you might think.
If you want to learn more about this, I suggest TIK’s video “Hitler’s socialism” here on RUclips. He cites over 107 sources, all of which are listed in the description of his video. I own many the physical copies of his sources for myself to read, some of the best being “The Vampire Economy” by G. Reimann, “Hitler’s Beneficiaries” by Götz Aly, among others.
That's a very poor argument, only because he is nationalist and racist don't mean he isn't socialist, it is actually in the name of his own political party... He implemented social safety programs, beetle was created for that, and he actually build a cruise ship to the force by joy program, he have the control over the private companies and can nacionalize if they don't cooperate... One thing we know for sure, he is not a capitalist... But all of that are socialist measures, because he miss 2 points don't place him in the right wing... But is not the modern view of socialism, he only be placed in the right wing because the pressure of URSS that don't want Nazism being classified as left ...
And actually by definition the real extreme right are the monarchy...
You keep saying "socialist" this and "socialist" that. He wasn't a *socialist* he was a *National Socialist*. He believed that Germany was for the German people - the PEOPLE - which is the very definition of National Socialism. He wanted (and for the most part succeeded) to have 1 race, 1 religion, and 1 creed to unite all Germany (including parts that had been given away after the First World War) after the devastation caused by WW1 and the Armistice that was signed. I'm not condoning his actions, but he was what defined National Socialism - Someone fighting for the rights, wealth, and land of the indigenous people to reclaim their own country from foreign nationals and to ensure jobs go to the German people first.
Amen!!!
That is still a form of socialism... He just used race instead of class
Race realism is a fact of live Karl Marx was a race realist also
marx, lenin, trotsky, mao's advisors, hitler's enemies were all hebrew, and among them were all communists/socialists, hitler despised marxian socialism and many times clarified them in his speeches.
i am not a leftist, and when someone compares this extremely right wing ideology [natsoc], it hurts my brain because it is intellectually dishonest.
@@icrushchildrensdreams4556 You are stuck thinking Marx was Socialism, it is but one variant of socialism.
The title should be Bias - An Example of Selective Interpretation.
What narrow band interpretation you have provided. Not convinced by you thus i must be stupid. :(
Hitler had Muslim soldiers in the SS.
Why is that so?
@@bakiro_1638it's not unbelievable. He did have foreign "volunteer" POW units of the SS, like the British, Baltic, Ukrainian, etc
@@ChristopherWood3606 Did Himmler have non German SS units? Yes. But he saw them as inferior to the German race, they were more like cannon fodder to preserve the "superior" Aryan units from dying, not to mention that they believed that while these foreign units weren't Aryan, they had a bit of aryanness in them and can join the SS. Tikhistory made an excellent video on the matter titled "insane reason why Himmler had non german ss units" Or smt like that, just search up tikhistory himmler and it should pop up, rly suggest u watch it.
@@bakiro_1638 what "German race"? What has being German got to do with speaking an "Aryan" (Indo-European) language, other than German is ONE Indo-European language?
Which did not fight not even once in the western front, they had it for manpower under himmler, not hitler.
This guy is ridiculously clueless.
I hate when people say socialism includes egalitarianism (or some equivalent). This is simply an excuse to say, "That's not socialism" every time we point out socialism failing.
If you're going to play that game, then "Capitalism is a system that promotes a free market, one that is free from corruption." Any corruption you find means, by definition, it's not capitalism!
Hitler was a socialist. Deal with it.
That doesn't mean all forms of socialism are bad. Any economic system can fail depending on numerous factors.
I won't stoop to the level of the author and call someone who doesn't believe like I do stupid. But the author does seem to be trying really hard to convince us the that Socialism comes in acceptable and un-acceptable flavors. As if to say a National socialist is wrong but socialism bent on destroying another form of economics and governance and world dominance is right. To be fair he doesn't come out and say that. But he really does seem to want to split hairs to try to distance the two.
Same could be said for American capitalism. We have become an imperialistic machine for capitalism. Even throwing our citizens under the train. Creating wars, for corporations. Subjecting other countries to living in squalor so we may buy our goods from them cheaper. If you think we don't, look around you. Also read War is a Racket by Smedley Butler. He brings up the Military Industrial Complex. He died in the 1920's and was a Major General of the USMC.
@@adamnicholes1002 Uh yeah, nope you're off course. Not sure what you were trying to reply to me with. You brought up old gimlet eye, who strangely ran as a prohibitionist and voted for a SOCIALIST for president 1936. He pretty much spouts socialist ideals, and {pushes class division, warfare) then actually campaigns against FDR (a pretty socialistic president upon review). but of course, while doing that, he was almost convinced to throw in his lot with people who also din;t like FDR, instead, because of their social and economic standing, he labels them fascist, Yeah, I kinda know about Gimlet eye, be careful of internet articles that label him "most decorated Marine" or most decorated vet, which is not to take anything at all away from him.
The only difference between the two is that national socialism was based around the German people or the national race while Marxist socialism is based around workers. Those are about the biggest differences I found with a few other exceptions.
We can always tell somebody’s losing an argument because they resort to personal attacks- like the author of this video.
Socialism is defined as the state ownership or control of the means of production and the Nazis had officers at virtually every corporation telling them how much should we do some way to produce it. This is very similar to Chinese Socialism currently.
Hitler’s addition to Mussolini’s fascism was to interject the issue of race, but historically socialist from the utopian socialist to the utilitarians were all very racist
Because that national socialism and socialism are two different things
I get your point that socialisme is secondary and the race and the country is primary. So yes Hitler was nazist and that differ from socialist. But that is really the only differnce. Even Karl Marx is racist since he hate jews because jews praise money and jews dont praise God. So you can't really say that Karl Marx is a socialist?
Marx was Jewish
Hitler was a bonafide Communist in 1919. Wore the uniform and everything.
Marx was also definitely Anti-Semitic
Why do you care if he is a socialist or not
I think we all know why.
trying to pretend like one of the most notorious historical examples of fascism (far right nationalism) was in fact socialism (left wing democracy) is perpetuating harmful misinformation. if people think the left caused the genocide in germany they will be more likely to repeat the mistakes of 20th century fascism/conservatism.
3:00 Actually yes they are to some extent there are other variants of socialism because Hitler's form of socialism was one variant. But in the case of Marxism Karl Marx saw history as a struggle between classes hence the difference in Marxist socialism. But all you really said in this video was that Hitler was racist and therefore he couldn't be a socialist. All the information I've gathered Hitler stated that he committed the Holocaust because the Jews were selfish and that they would destroy the socialist Utopia he wanted to build (very basic summary guy was kind of a nut). If he wasn't a socialist why did he kill all those people are you saying he didn't or are you saying he was just racist because he was racist?
Unemployment fell dramatically in Germany under Hitler’s socialism.
"Hitler's form of socialism was one variant" wrong.
Hitler believed that in removing "Jewishness" and socialism, the entire class system would fall apart, thus uniting the German people into 1 ruling class
in no way in this video do you actually state how hiylers socialism wasn't actually socialism. his racial politics and the nationalistic outlook of hitlers Germany really have nothing to so with anything. by the way mousollini was also a socialist.
+Crashcoursemedia thanks for your rather incoherent thoughts. I am not inclined to take lessons in history from someone who is incapable of actually spelling Hitler and Mussolini correctly.
look at the host of social state funded programs implemented. How are they right wing?
Hitler hated capitalism dude.... the right thrives through private enterprise. The 3rd reich constituted a massive centralized state entity, how is that right wing???
Lmao, this is how modern lefties like Nick here argue; by condescending to peoples valid points. You don't seem inclined to defend your weak arguments. Not surprising.
You are right, he was not not a socialist.
@Brendan Day and what do you have to back that up?
According to Hitler, he was the real socialist.
You are right, he was the Uber Socialist.
@@beneficent2557 dude the nazis whole thing was that they hated socialism. that was their thing years before they even started thinking about jewish people. they are antithetical to each other.
@@soraparent1256 every academically accepted historical record
Hitler always talked about the people(volk)
@TheRedHand101and which class is the most numerous exactly?
Read the history again :)
@Sebastien BOHAN nope, he created it. He was against Mousilini at first but then changed his mind.
Its wasnt capitalist either...Why dont just call it THIRD POSITION?
Alexander Boychev he got funded by Henry Ford , and Prescott Bush Lol . He had plenty to do with capitalism. He went rogue in the end .
China receives money from American companies, China is still socialist.
@@phillrollannd1436 China is not socialist. Companies can not have non-collective ownership in socialism, therefore both China and Nazi Germany were not socialist.
@@shanekonarson The Bolsheviks got lots of capitalist money as well.
@@phillrollannd1436 No unfortunately China isn't socialist.
😂🤣 that is literally national socialism 😂🤣
The key word is nationalist (strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations) in this case the nation of allegedly superior ethnically german people over their Jewish and communist neighbors domestic and abroad. An intrinsically racist hierarchical society is antithetical to the democratic ideal socialism represents. The word was incorporated into the name of their political party to attract working class voters.
@@taylormerriweather2824 what you say you represent and what you do are two different things. Even the Liberals were conservatives in Hitlers time. Today they stole the name but are the least Liberal people we ever had. The liberals are now exactly like Hitler. Divide and control.
@@taylormerriweather2824 Do you really think the socialists care about or support any other people besides themselves?
@@JasonManners you’re just talking out of your ass bud, do some basic research. Try starting with the nazi page of Google or something, education is a beautiful thing.
@@JasonManners do you think “the capitalists” do? And yes, I’m a socialist and I do care about people other than myself.
I'm loving the like/dislike ratio
Marx hated socialismus, who decide weather socialism is national or international? marx?
I think when he wrote ‘workers of the world unite’ he was giving us a clue.
“All the more so after the war, the German National Socialist state, which pursued this goal from the beginning, will tirelessly work for the realization of a program that will ultimately lead to a complete elimination of class differences and to the creation of a true socialist community.” - March 21, 1943, speech for Heroes’ Memorial Day This was Hitler
No evidence, just an empty vacuous rant ...
You must have read Das Kapital!
He's and was a socialist nationalists but was a right wing liberal, but it's complicated
did you really come here to call hitler a liberal.
Read 'The Vampire Economy.'
Nonsense
National 'Socialist' German workers party. You debunked your own propaganda video in your opening statement.
@WTW 142 No they didn't... They were socialists... They were NATIONAL socialists..Marxist socialism vs Hitlers Nationalism socialism
@WTW 142 the NAZI policies were socialist, you can't escape it, it was state control of everything, that is Socialism.
@WTW 142 ok, rephrase for your sake, what the NAZI "Nationalist Sozialismus" did was socialist, you can't escape it, it was state control of everything, big government etc. that is Socialism, government control of the individual. Most socialism ends up being some form of dictatorship or fascism if you like.
Yes and KFC does not stand for Fried Chicken anymore.
You best do some learning kid
You're missing alot in your understanding
They see "national socialist party" and take it as face value.
Why not? Many National socialists did. Including Goebbles.
No, you go by what he created. Socialism.
@@JasonManners he literally put socialists and communists in camps socialism at the time was partly popular in germany at the time he used this to gain extra support socialism is a transitionary period between capitalism and communism how in any way is that what hitler was aiming to achieve
@@zx8848 I wouldn't be able to change your mind, you have it already made up. I could give you all the evidence but you would deny it so we will just have to agree to disagree. There are so many quotes and proof he loved socialism and hated capitalism but people still do and hear what they tell you without using logic or reasoning. Feelings only are stronger than logic if you let them be. I guess most people can easily be tricked and are too stubborn to open their mind.
@@JasonManners no seriously provide me with some quotes of hitler praising the ideology that he put people in death camps for believing in watch three arrows a actual germans video on this he explains what im trying to
What type of people were Stalin and Mussolini?
Far right fascists
@Corn Pop i know and agree that stalin was some kind of communist i was more focused on mussolini, my mistake
Stalin was a Bolshevik, Mussolini was a Socialist until he was kicked out the party after returning from war, he utilized Fascism as an opposite to Socialism.
@@Semtex_1992
“You cannot get rid of me because I am and always will be a socialist. You hate me because you still love me.”
@@Semtex_1992"To-day you hate me, because in your heart of hearts you still love me, because.... [Interrupted by crowd]
But you have not seen the last of me! Twelve years of my party life are, or ought to be, a sufficient guarantee of my faith in Socialism. Socialism is something which takes root in the heart. What divides me from you now is not a small dispute, but a great question over which the whole of Socialism is divided"
I can't be believe someone could so ignorant and say something so ridiculous??? Wow!!!
Thank you for this video. People are so ignorant and scared of the word socialism. There is nothing socialist about Nazis, it's fairly obvious to anyone who actually bothered to read Karl Marx.
Hitler's form of socialism did not follow Karl Marx. He did not believe in the nationalizing of private property.. However he was a race based socialist. This was a different form of socialism. It was a competing form of socialism
Hitler isn't a marxist. Your conflating Marxism with socialism as if socialism can only be Marxist.
@@allcommentsmatter6890 your comment makes no sense.
not even state power..?
Well thanks for clearing that up sunshine. I don't want either one of those.
Dumitru Sandru disagrees with you. He wrote a book called Hitler was a Socialist. And this man is not stupid. Has many degrees.
Hitler was a centrist lol
and 82 stupid people disliked this
You Call People Stupid in advance and then Come Up with a weak, "Non-Sense" (to say that least) Video like This? .... What does that make You?
You have to stop focusing on your own opinions and learn about human history
It’s never emotion, it’s only data and human history.
When you blink your eyes before you talk it’s you brain storming and that’s when your emotion kicks in.
Not worth listening to
Stupid or dishonest?
+Joe Navajo mainly just stupid I think
Both.
You are wrong smegma breath!!!!!!
In Gemany: you are German or you are not. In USSR: you are communist or you are not. There is no difference. Both regimes were bad just different circumstances - different outcomes, but conclusion is the same extreme socialism is terrifying.