The Fastest Battleship - Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- Need some speed? Get this BB.
Support me on Patreon: / stealth17gaming
😀 Social
▪️ Discord: / discord
👍 Patreon & RUclips Supporters
Major General USMC COG
Major General Corey Stone
Major General Gosrith
Major General Fishburn
Colonel Accord Driver
Colonel Amund Brendryen (LordenIII)
Colonel Hawkeye471
Lt. Colonel Elfwyn
Lt. Colonel Metzger
Major 4nge1us
Major Aura
Major Cast Outlaw
Major Titus
Major Hooded Horse
Major Isaac Chung
Major LCG Lurch
Major VF-114 Jock
Major Lord_Daniel_DE
Major Gray
Major Catfish Hunter
Major Thepisswasser
Major Darth Malakor
Captain Viale
Captain Mrozak
Captain Bennet
Captain Madison
Captain Brown
Captain Un Bekannt
Captain WinterStorm1776
Captain Seifert
Captain EXCELLENT GAMING
Captain Lone Wulf
❓ FAQ
▪️ PC specs:
Ryzen 9 5900X - amzn.to/302kxwV
NVIDIA RTX 3080 - amzn.to/3lGDuwZ
Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming II - amzn.to/3y0qmaN
Kingston HyperX FURY 32 GB DDR4 3200 MHz - amzn.to/3mPsFKp
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD 1TB - amzn.to/3iwMKRG
Keyboard Corsair K70 Mk2 - amzn.to/2YaEDUv
Mouse Logitech G502 - amzn.to/3hOf9n8
▪️ Recommended RUclips tools?
Tubebuddy! Saves me a ton of time with tags/cards - www.tubebuddy.....
Elgato Streamdeck for quick access: amzn.to/3zfcLM1
Blue Yeti - amzn.to/2W0shxc
Epidemicsound. Excellent music. Used it in quite a few of my videos - share.epidemic...
▪️ When do you stream?
Very rarely.
Can I play with you?
▪️ Yes you can, by becoming a supporter through Patreon or RUclips membership. You need to be at least Major tier to be eligible. You can find the links to these programs above.
Will you play game X?
▪️ Please search my channel first. There is a pretty good chance that I've already covered it. I know what games my audience and I like playing ;).
Why does your video have so many ads?!
▪️ Please read this community post: / @stealth17gaming
Some of the links in this description are affiliate links.
Have any other fun challenges? Post them below and you might see me do it soon.
Make a Japanese BB or BC that would be as sneaky as possible. So low draft, low smoke, etc.
the goal would be to sneak upon a mm American task force and shoot them before they could spot you. So be as much as possible elusive.
Also use fog or rain or whatever necessary to boost these effects.
And call the ship “elusive pancake” for the lols
No, no. You're doing it wrong.
You're not supposed to Zig-Zag. They'll obviously expect that.
You should try to Zag-Zig occasionally. 😅
I am well aware that you dont particularly like pre dreadnoughts but since the ai is terrible at designing ships what about the best pre dreadnought you can design vs an early dreadnought of the ai
Also yeah, you should have zigged when you zagged. That's the only reason you took so much damage. 😅
Here's a suggestion: Make a single destroyer with 1950s tech and see up to what year you can go up against a dozen enemy battleships before the challenge becomes impossible to do.
Channel your inner USS Johnston.
I think the hovering turret became into existence when you were undoing the deletion of barbette.
When a ship lists too much to fire broadside, it still can fire over the bow or stern (list doesn't effect those firing lines).
That's what happened.
When you were on the BBs broadside, it could not fire die to the list.
But because this went around it, it could fire over the stern, causing you the problems you encountered nearing the end of the battle.
If you would have stayed on it's broadside, it wouldn't have been able to fire at you and you would've taken it down.
You were talking about ChatGPT and that made me think: “Can ChatGPT design a ship, and will it be better than a Dreadnought AI design?”
No, because ship files are too big for current LMMs to tokenize.
It would need to be dedicated AI for dreadnoughts
@@Forien
No. Wrong. "Messier 82" has done multiple videos of using GPT to design aircraft in "Fly Out." All you do is chat with the AI, give it parameters that are things you can do in the game (so if the AI tells you to make something "x" when only "y" is capable in-game, you tell the AI that) and work through the details with the AI. You have to *_heavily_* guide it, but it's workable.
22:26 Maybe at least the 11 billion dollar price tag is made up for the fact it has a floating turret with shells that can teleport for loading lmao
lol did you notice--- the flash fire was in the turret WITHOUT a barbet :)
Wireless flash fire
A 60,000t BB with the acceleration of a Porsche. Nice.
The enemy BB was built more like a mobile coastal defence battery than a mainline warship. Something you'd park in a port and use for AAA and defence against raids from DD/CL.
That BB that the AI designed almost has more armor on the first layer of the belt than Yamato did on it's turrets
The reason the enemy battleship engaged you the whole time is because it kept the list to starboard (or the stern in some cases) pointed towards the Tripoli. Its main guns had no problem elevating to fire back at short ranges - incidentally, that is why the Tripoli was out of range earlier than you expected. If your ocean-going Ferrari had been on the opposite side of the list, the story would have been much different.
Don't underestimate 2" guns. That's still 50mm naval gun rounds in the 1950's doing quite a bit of damage to the crew and systems on deck.
Well there is a chance that the Battle Bunker is a result of the AI learning from Stealths challenge shipbuilding. I believe its a strong possibilty.
A few changes to the ship could have provided a lot more damage:
First, use 2.9 inch secondary guns(75mm), and longer barrels. The increased range and accuracy would provide a safety net agaisnt convoys and destroyers, plus some additional punch.
Next. Armor the deck! 4-6 inch is cruiser deck armor, not a proper BB.
And lastly, use that speed to ensure you only engage the target you want, outside of the enemy range or torpedoes.
Every time all the mains fire in rapid succession it sounds like a machine gun but with some thickness haha
The Italian fast battleship Tripoli is in flash fire (39:53)
A heavy battleship that you can park somewhere and don't care about repairs, basically a Tirpitz with better stats
Now Stealth. If you keep loosing your barbets we aren't going to keep buying you new ones!
I cannot belive the italians invented the Bluetooth turret
5:58
Engineers *_HATE_* him. Learn this *_ONE SIMPLE TRICK_* that this Admiral used to speedrun a convoy destruction!
6knots/second. That is pretty much 1/3 of gravity. That is holariusly insane
Unironically this ship plan could work as a sort of hyper-doctrinally pure battlecruiser
16:00 I think the acceleration in battle is calculated against your current speed so the ship leaps forward from a stand still but as it approaches its maximum speed and drag really starts increasing it can't accelerate as much.
The problem with the game when it comes to transports is that there is no logic in how the defending ships located compared to the transports. If they were to mimic proper naval tactics than the transports would be in the middle, possibly in a line formation, and the escort ships would be on both sides of the transports. I am not sure that they used tactics where the escorts formed a circle around the transport ships back then but I could be wrong.
4.257 knots per second acceleration roughly equals 0 to 44.8 miles an hour in 9.1 seconds!! I wish those numbers were closer to what happened in game.
I think the AI awful designs are in part because of the crazy economy in 1.4. They think they've made a good ship, and on v1.3, a billion was a lot. But now everything costs more. The $600m BCs are now $2.8 billion. It's nuts. Everything should be divided by 10.
This inspired me to do the same test. I've just one-shot a 20,000t CA with 11.5" main belts worth... $3.5 billion. These are silly numbers.
At 12.5 kilometers you can just barely go through the main belt(42.4 inches)
18 inch with 14% shorter barrel vs 16Inch with 14% more barrel length in comparison.
Game Version 1.4.0.7
1950 Custom game Italian.
Charge/Warhead : Cordite 2 + Dunnite.
Twin 16 Inch +14% length vs Twin 18 Inch -14% length
Cost : $27.7M vs 12.45M
Range : 52Km vs 33 Km
Accuracy : 3-4% vs 1.5-1.9% at 15Km
RoF : Once every 77.5s vs 49.1s (standard loader)
52.7s vs 33.4s (Auto II)
Pen : AP 30 inch with SAP vs 34 inch
Damage : 3660/5984 (AP/HE) vs 6679/10923
They both has the same weight.
IMHO i always use the bigger gun with shorter barrel as long the range reduction still within a reasonable range.
Also the accuracy stated on the gun itself still will be buffed with other things like crew veterancy, radar, stability, engine vibration, etc.
Another example, 18.9 Inch +22% is much heavier than 20 Inch with -20%; also the 20 Inch have like only one third of the cost.
Maybe one thing you might want to consider when designing a ship. Or to put a test which one performs better.
Hey just watched a bit if the videos you have.
I think a spot you struggle with is multi formation command. I notice you can get fixated on one event and only turn the attention back to others when so etching happens.
That isn't be a good place to start to try and get the large formation effectiveness up.
0-60(mph) 8.1 seconds
28:30 I thought that's what the Shared Designs were for but it's honestly just so tedious to go and design a ship even for every 5 years for every nation.
Love this ship so much thanks
we have a barbette at home XD
16:28 I always find the accel/deccel a little confusing. According to the game, my french BC reversing at half speed has a acceleration of about 10 knots per second...
My man out here trying to make SkyNet™ more effective at killing.
1) why u always avoid putting guns on superstructure? they are more accurate than deck leyer (less smoke, more vision)
2) also, love the wireless turret u got there, rofl
3) modern data AI is pretty heavy, idk if u can fit it in a 3.5gig game 🙃
4) it is possible to get higher speed at cost of engine efficiency by pushing the speed cap in config file
"modern data AI is pretty heavy," Hey no body shaming, maybe AI has big bones, or more muscle. Maybe it was told a kid to always eat everything on it's plate... Or deals with depression by eating sweets...
@@ShionWinkler 🤣
I've not tried it in a while so I don't know if it still works, but if you take a hull with 120 or so hull form and minimize beam and draught you can get the math that determines engine weight to break. This results in a ship that has virtually no engine weight. I did it with the biggest British BC hull and managed to make an up-armored, 70kton Hood that could do 49kts with turbo-electric and have
(3) 4.2" guns per transport. Clearly you found the Q ships...
I do not like when game developers put hard caps on things for no reason. When we can get the 100,000 ton Nimitz-class to 40+ classified knots.
alas in many cases it is actually for reasons, simulations can get funky when things start going too fast
Ok I have this game and you saying that the battleship looked like am mobile anti air gun with main cannons as an afterthought made me think of one of my designs…
It has 3 20 inch guns and more than 100 various secondary guns all over it it is so fun but so useless😂
How about you this: Super Battle Ship, One Tower pushed all the way back. Load as many guns of the same size on babbets down the center. With as many secondary guns down the sides. Call it the CHARGER. And you charge straight at the enemy formation exposing only the front profile. Single or Twin torps only and loads of armor. NO Secondary Tower and all the funnels you need.
I wanted to clarify. No guns besides or behind the Tower. Only torps can go there. That way it can be the "CHARGER". Thank you. Also you have inspired me to buy the game this weekend with your videos.
Is it possible to make an asymmetrical Battleship, so that either port or starboard guns look over the other Allowing all guns to engage the same target in a broadside?
Yes, and was also done in RL. Not that good.
@@andrew3203 I don't care about real life applications. However in a game if you design a ship with port and starboard guns, like he did in this video. Having one side elevated over the other shouldn't cause much issue. He already sacrificed half of his armament in a broadside.
you couldve been just fine with 2 funnels. dont rlly know why youõd need that fast of an accel. you were asked for the fastest ship in speed not accel right?
I am disappointment in your lack of faith in 5 inch secondaries
"This is what generally works" is a bit stupid.. works.. for what? maybe it's a meme-/trollfit? maybe it's for speeding through a convoy and AI uses it on a battleship-only fight.. the level of human "understanding" is a bit difficult to tell to an AI^^
okayyy..... structual ~3%, for 98% sunk, but still manages to do a 39Mph?!? The game gets more broken with every update it seems
*45 mph for 39 knots