@@ChrisPBacon-yt8hi Result of IQ Test Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data. any idea why please? :D
question 23 15:41 the answer is F you need 3 black circles per row, 3 white triangles per row, 1 black triangle per row, 1 black square per row, and 1 white square per row. As for the shape patterns the bottom row is just the top row flipped on a Y axis.
Got the same result, different approach: Diagonally, top right to bottom left, the rows contain the same shapes, but they are always offset one to the left, with the one coming off on the left side coming back in from the right.
An intelligence test has many other types of problems other than the shapes. Many years back I was given a test that a psychologist used--(I think it was the WAIS) and it put me around 130. Most of the online ones will get me in the 125-135 range.
@@wrttech422 The correlation to result in WAIS is only 0.6 or something if I remember correctly. It correlates very well with some individuals but not for others.
@@achyuththouta6957 that's because these only test fluid intelligence while the wais also measures crystallized intelligence www.simplypsychology.org/fluid-crystallized-intelligence.html#:~:text=The%20Wechsler%20Adult%20Intelligence%20Scale,(Kaufman%20%26%20Lichtenberger%202006).&text=Most%20of%20these%20verbal%20tests,capable%20of%20measuring%20crystallized%20intelligence. The correlation between these tests and Ravens progressive matrices is significantly higher.
I’ve gotten anywhere from 125-134 online too. These tests seem somewhat bullshit anyway, but they probably have some validity in measuring fluid intelligence
The other ones are set to give u 130s and stuff. I tried on a test and then pressed the answers I knew were wrong and, NO WAY, I got the same score again!
exercise 23: each row had 3 blackened circles, 1 triangle and 1 square. So the answer had to be a blackened circle and a triangle. And the 1st and 3rd rows seem to be reversed with the order of the shapes so i picked F.
Yay, I'm smarter than i thought. 133 in NO and 138 in DK. But i did not understand couple of the last ones in DK. When i watched you struggle with them i finally understood some of them but not the last one. I rly enjoyed the symmetry in the DK test.
At least the 2nd to last one in DK is they the column of colors move down 1 space and the colors in each column move to the right 1 space. The last 1 idk
The last one in DK (39) is pretty hard, but it becomes evident once you see the solution. In each box, take the first two columns and shift them to the right in the next box according to the following rules: square -> circle, circle -> triangle, triangle -> square. To demonstrate this, I will use coordinates like (x,y), where x describes the row of the given box, and y refers to the column of the box. In the first row of the puzzle, we look at the first and second figures inside the box, which are (1,1) square, and (1,2) triangle. In the next box, we shift and change them according to the rules. We can see that indeed, (1,2) of the second box is a circle (1,1 square -> 1,2 circle), and (1,3) is a square (1,2 triangle -> 1,3 square). You can confirm that it works for every row of each box in the puzzle. In order to get the answer, we look at the middle box of the last column and focus on the first two columns within the box. The transformations to the third box (i.e. the answer) will look like this: (1,1) square -> (1,2) circle (1,2) square -> (1,3) circle (2,1) triangle -> (2,2) square (2,2) triangle -> (2,3) square (3,1) triangle -> (3,2) square (3,2) square -> (3,3) circle The only answer that has this combination of figures in the last two columns is F
I passed these three tests and my results are: 1) 102 points, 2) 109 points, 3) 103 points. I also once passed the Raven matrix test, where I scored 110 points, in the description of the result it was written that I had an outstanding intellect, in turn, I would not say that about myself. I feel very stupid, I wish I hadn't been born. Thank you for the video.
@@jacktheslayer-id5so I hear myself. What is it about my proposal that you don't understand? It is hard to live with low intelligence in this world, those who have high intelligence have all the doors open in front of them, but of course, you also need to have motivation in order to achieve something.
@@ВасилийАфанасьев-п1я i just got a 142 on the mensa norway and i can say with absolute certainty that it does not matter. why? because it's nothing worth stroking your cock over. have you heard of the chinese gaokao test? i know someone who scored VERY high and got into a prestigious school; extremely high iq. he makes 70k now. i know someone else who scored fairly low. ended up going to a state school in the US. makes 500k now. his iq wasnt high, but his emotional intelligence was something else. iq can only get you so far, but eq is what truly defines success. those with people skills tend to dominate mere pattern-recognizing machines. you overestimate iq. eq is what matters, and eq is actually trainable unlike iq. besides, you score consistently above average. is that really something to kick yourself over? you're smarter than most of the people you meet. that sounds pretty good to me.
The answer for 38 is A. You need to keep track of it as you'd do in Sudokus. No same color in the same row or line. Mine were: Norway: 135 Denmark: 138 Sweden: 126+
I think that is a Rubic cube, so the colours cant overlap position. I think is C, but i am not quite sure. The reason is that in others answers, some colours overlap.. Btw mine is 133 on Norwey? I did Denmark test too, but that was long ago, so i dont remeber the score.
On the Mensa Norway test, you were supposed to click "Next" on the answers you did not know, rather than picking a letter at random because it changes your final score.
128 would be appx 96th or 97th percentile. In a room full of 100 people taking the tests, you would rank 4th or 3rd place. You really, definitely shouldn't be disappointed.
Intelligence is not something to be proud of I’m not talking about hard work, or anything like that, but run-of-the-mill intelligence, the kind that means you can put less effort into learning things and still do well/understand stuff better than other people. People get so much praise for it and I see no point or merit in that. Feeling proud of being smart is as empty and meaningless as feeling proud for being beautiful. It’s not something you created or worked towards, it’s an arbitrary characteristic completely out of your control that you were born with. It’s pointless to feel proud of something that’s totally out of your hands. It doesn’t reflect on the kind of person you are. What’s more important is the decisions you make, how you behave, and what you do with the hand you’re given in life. Those are things to be proud of.
Except intelligence can be worked towards. You can gain intelligence with practice and effort. Human beings should have pride in their intelligence, it's what got humanity this far, and will be the what gets us farther. People can also work on their body image through exercise, and self care. There's nothing wrong with being prideful about it as long as you're not doing it to the extent of being a narcissist. Ask yourself if you're projecting your own insecurities.
bro the way you explained exercise 29 in the first iq test made me scream my man you are the man, i literally hyped the fuck out of you when you found the solution because it brought me the solution also.
@@josegeermano9537 Dude everyone is averaging above 120+ in the comments, unless people with high I.Q. are more likely to seek out I.Q. tests or those who perform well are more likely to report their scores or they lie, it just doesn't seem distributed correctly where are the people that got 100, 90, 105? Like does everyone have very superior intelligence here??
Also i witnessed many people in real life taking these tests ages 20 to 25 and rarely someone would score above 120.Contrary to what the media say these tests are also very good at predicting social and emotional intelligence as studies show.There is a substantial correlation between iq and socioemotional cognition which is also found in the brain.If you got a high score be thankful because you didn't do anything to earn it.
@@stellar2percent Basically there is but you can't measure it.But it's also a skill so you can call it social awareness.Anything that is a skill has a genetic component to that.
you sure? smart people I know are all pretty weird. I'm around 135-140, and I just don't understand people. It's like dumb arguments full of logical fallacies they eat up like it's the word of god, while logically sound arguments make them go like "bro that's the stupidest thing I ever heard". It's so hard to understand how to speak in a way that's convincing to normies. And to be clear, I don't think I'm a genius or anything; I know people who are far smarter than me. But at least, when they point out the holes in my logic, I can understand it. Or at least, i can understand that there's something I'm not understanding that they are.
The Norwegian was much easier than all the IQ tests I do for jobs, and I get slightly above average on those. Plus this pase is slower than mine. My scores are compared to people within my field of work, but that would mean that my colleagues would all be in Mensa, which is of course not likely. Thank you for recording this 😊
I've taken three proctored iq tests in total starting from adolescence to date, and I've scored from 135 to 145. Each test was completely different. For those whom think they will study such that they can inflate their score somehow before taking the test is sorely mistaken. Sure, you can study vocab and read a lot to inflate verbal fluency, or practice geographical quizzes that test for location and distance. You could perhaps even practice with numbers, memorization and counting. Or, you could learn strategies for solving visual puzzles; but this will only increase your score by like 3 points at most. The test is generally concerned with how many questions you get correct with time remaining: that is, your agility and endurance, which plays a pretty significant role in iq and G-factor.. which cannot be faked or practiced.
I mean I finished the norway one with 138, but like 10 mins left over, and I wasn't super focused and spent the first minute fixing my screen so it all fit without me having to scroll... the problem isn't with time, it's that I don't know what kinds of patterns the other questions require. IF I had seen the answers and learned of the patterns they're using, I would likely be able to solve them all even with a completely different set of questions cuz you only need to know the logic behind it.
These types of tests are nowhere near a real IQ test. People whom use them to measure their intelligence against others (while actually believing it are valid tests) are morons and should seek professional help (where their true IQ probably will be measured). Because I have autism and chronic depression, my intelligence has been measured on multiple occasions when I reached out for help. I score 99 percentile in most online tests while my actual valid professional taken IQ tests are nowhere near of that (still score very bright, the 4 tests I have been mandated in my life were always around 122 give or take 1-5 points. But it's definitely not the 150's 160's I score in online tests)
You need to answer the questions correctly to get a score, it's going to tell you that exact message if you randomly answer through each question. First I got a score of 145+ and because I was curious, I tried doing it again by clicking randomly and got that exact message as well.
Your IQ is actually 123 (119-127 95% confidence interval). I know this because I can literally just tell. High IQ individuals such as myself are extremely proficient at holistic analysis and Freudian reductions upon minimal, but liminal, information.
Hey dont feel bad, i also just above average but not genius also mine was 121 on denmark, dont feel sad with iq bc it doesnt use enough in our world/ daily life. Most of our life we need knowledge to do something . Iq makes easier to understand the knowledge. Like maths, we learn maths to know how to count but iq makes u be able to explore what's inside the count and make use of it. Thats why we seen many ppl who had iq can elaborate something to be better. Thats just it. It helps u to be the top in humanity, thats all. Since im just above average, all i wanted was a good happy life. It doesnt guud tho if u get a genius iq but doesnt had a happy life. But still being above average we still could see something a bit that average ppl couldn't see you should be happy with that ! :D ITS OK TO NOT BE GENIUS, an iq of above average is a gift for u, appreciate it :).
@@angelDanJonathan It peaks at age 20 and then starts declining. Your IQ test will not reflect that though as your IQ will remain in the same ballpark for a majority of your life.
Acum mai multe zile la un test mensa cel mai exact test din lume mi-a ieșit iq-ul 122,iar acum in ziua de azi am făcut un test foarte exact și mi-a ieșit iq-ul 120,și mi-a scris și certificat dar m-a pus sa scriu și numele,mă bucur de aceste IQ-uri bune.
Funny, I took the Norway test and got 98. I assume my adhd interfered because I was constantly daydreaming and didn't finish it in time. I took it a second time with a bit more discipline and got 108. A few months later, I took the Denmark test and got 123, Finnish (121), and Hungarian (120). I would like to think the three last tests give a more accurate representation given they show a good score. However, maybe there was a practice effect from the two times I took the Norway test that led to improvement. If this were the case, I don't know how to gauge what my score range is.
@Noah Joseph No, but the thing is, each test has different kinds of questions. All of these questions are figure series type questions, and the only way to gauge my IQ for these types of questions is to take an actual test. This is because the test can verify how well I generally answer these types of questions by giving a certain variety and quantity. Because of these factors, it's difficult to gauge an accurate mean.
I have ADD but I like doing Iq tests I got 130 on Denmark but my real iq is more like a 120 Iq, doing more gives you do knowledge of how to handle Iq problems. you seem to have 115iq
I had a 133, and one of my closest friends had an IQ of 138. However, I am diagnosed with ADHD, and in a more serious test I took by a psychiatrist, that also lowered the result (and the test really showed it particularly). I expect that it had affected this one too. Anyway, glad that I seem to have enough (I hope) potential to excel at my passions. Thank you for this video.
I also got quite high scores. Now I would love to have an IQ of 135 . But for me it feels a bit like they are trying to convince you to do a "real (paid) Mensa" test and thats why all our scores are so high...
Thank you for this! In the Danish test: isn't A the answer to exercise 38, rather than H? With H, the white box ends up in the same horizontal line as the white box of the figure directly above. There is no such overlap with any coloured box if you choose A.
The score that i got on mensa Norway first try was 128 (anxious) and after taking it again 135.In the mensa Denmark and Finland i took them almost two years ago (i don't remember the scores) and now i took them again and scored in both 135.Mensa Sweeden max 126. I recently got 142 on full scale real iq test and 145 on spatial specifically.In Greece the average iq is 92.
So you are saying that these online tests in this video are actually harder than the real deal, it seems like everyone in the comments is at least getting 120 on these online tests, but that may be because people who score well are more likely to report their score in comments or people who are interested in taking I.Q. tests are on average higher I.Q.'d. Nevertheless, well done on your scores, what was the name of the official test you took in Greece out of curiosity??
Hey man, as far as I can see, your score, as well as mine and svensk8squad´s score (who commented here too), indicate that Mensa Denmark gives you a 5 points lower IQ compared to Norway. I did the Mensa Admission Test and asked my percentile and maybe my result is higher cause I might have left unchecked some answers put in the wrong question if I ever did it more than once (just conspiracy) after I rechecked it, but my official score indicates what I expected: Norway lies 15 points more from the official IQ (in reality it captures from 70 to 130, duh) and Denmark 10 points (caps at 70, but goes till 135 for some reason). Nice video and insights about the topic!
but if he got 131+ on official and 138 on Norway it means that site is correct about his iq, maybe you`re just trained for this kind of tasks after official iq test
I beg to differ. The most difficult tasks on Mensa Norway are NOT 130 IQ level. Like Q32-35, it requires ridiculous abstraction for a 130 IQ to get EVERY QUESTION RIGHT. I've never seen anyone get all questions right on Mensa Norway in the time limit. In summary, I think it inflates the lower IQ people's score and deflates the higher IQ people's score. So, both tests are inaccurate, and inflate everybody's score to make them pay for IQ tests when in actuality you're all AVERAGE, if not, below average.
Not to mention, the tests don't account for age! I'm 10 and I scored 142 on Mensa Norway, and 138 on Denmark. However, I'm held to the same standard as an 18 year old?!?! How is this supposed to be indicitive of my true g-factor when I'm held to the same standard as someone 8 years older than me? And yes, I know they explicitly mention that people under 16 shouldn't take Mensa Norway for accurate results. However, the tests still don't account for age at the higher intellects. They have no concept of proliferating fluid intelligence as a result of age, and so therefore these tests are merely devised by greedy people who get people to play into the concept of g. Until these tests ameliorate age factorization, I will continue to loathe the concept of g.
Mensa Norway - 138 Mensa Denmark - 143 Mensa Sweden - 126 I've took multiple IQ tests and score higher than a 138, so it should be at around a 140, but if I recall, then around a 138-143, so a 140/141. I've never took the SAT/ACT yet because I'm in 10th lol
@@VintageMusic729 hi I Took the SACFT test And I Got 28 out of 36 questions right it said that my iq score is 144 i think that's a bit of a stretch is it created by mensa?
Norway: 133, which is surprising since I guessed on the last 3 or 4 and finished early Denmark: 123 Sweden: 126< I just guessed on the last 6-7 questions for the Denmark, got bored I guess
I love how everyone.got over 120 on the comments I don't know if it's because they are lying or because the teste is giving higher iq than what's suppose
Thank you for this! In the Norway test: isn't C the answer to exercise 14, rather than A? The figure rotates 45 degrees 1 time and 90 degrees 1time on each row/column.
Mensa Norway: 135 Mensa Denmark: 128 Mensa Sweden: 126+ (max) Mensa Hungary: 126+ (max) Mensa Finland: 130 Soooo??? I honestly am shocked with this result since I get alot of bad grades in school.... ouch Edit: I added mensa Finland
A high iq doesn't mean youll make good grades, it just means youll likely be able to make higher grades than the average person with less study. Like wrt tech stated in this video, these tests were not meant to replace a psychologist proctored IQ test, and you should take your scores with a grain of salt. These mensa tests also only test fluid intelligence, and lack the crystalized section to give you a G score.
9:58 so this one was one of the easier ones for me The first time it rotates half a 90`, so 45`, instead of moving to the 90` (45+45) it goes further, meaning it moved 90`
impresum please tell me i scored at Tero41 first time and showed me that i have - Congratulations your result is SUPERIOR now it triggers me to pay now? or ...
Question 21 of the first test was E, not B. The first row adds parts when over lapped, the second row subtracts parts when they overlap. To continue the pattern, the third row must add parts when overlapping.
Short answer : you are wrong Long anwer : First of all it's not just about adding parts or subtracting parts , it's about adding what is uncommon and subtracting what is common. Now in the first row there is no common part except for some points so they add up. Now you may say the points didn't subtract. But look at the 2nd row of the question 11 , here 1 st image should subtract from 2 nd image but here also the points didn't get erase. The iq test is wrong here I guess. If anyone reads this please comment back have you understood my point or not. No pun intended.
No, in the first row there was nothing to subtract because there was nothing they had in common, on the second row, what overlapped (what they had in common) got subtracted and what they didn't have in common was added. If you study the pattern you would come to the conclusion that B is the correct answer.
denmark - 123 norway - 112 sweden - 110 official - 115 My age - 16 So which is which.... i think denmark was accurate cuz the others i guessed and time ran out
On question 35 of test #2 is it reasonable to assume we are supposed to take C and turn the square on its side. That will give us the 4 red squares in the top right quadrant and the 4 blue squares in the top left.
The way that I solved it was: for each one of the rows - take the left tile and rotate it 90 degrees to the right. Then take the second picture and swap the cube in any of the gray tiles to the other gray tile, and then rotate the figure 90 degrees to the left and that's your solution. Using that logic you also get that C is the correct solution.
Very good proposal. I do think most tests are only good to separate who is gifted and who is not, and they are not useful to really measure intelligence.
@hitler did noting worong yeah, it’s just a metric for evaluating how your brain works in one way. In this case, it’s for the purpose of pattern recognition. It has been said (misattributed to Stephen Hawking although no such proof exists) that “intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.” I tend to agree with that sort of sentiment...I’ve seen stupid people be brilliant and brilliant people be stupid, and either in positions unbefitting of what we’d conventionally expect.
at 50:38 it looks like the grey squares move counter clockwise and that tells you which squares are going to bo colored in, you just do that then also with the first squares with the red and blue colors you just inverse the colors (if red is left of blue its on the right..etc) I think it's D
It's F, I believe. There are three distinct form that have additional 2 form that are equally formed, yet the color moves by one block and so the others follow.
Really, thats wierd... I scored like 131 on the Norway one and 130 on the Denmark one (with distractions tho). I also have a friend that also scored 131 on the Norway one and she got similar results on a test at the psychologist(130~). Soo yea your results are odd.
@@teoteo3522 I know, I'm just really inconsistent and easily distracted so maybe those factors affected my scores in some way??? Idk but I'm pretty average and kinda stupid irl so If I were to score myself I'd say my Iq is around 110 - 120 or something.
15:40 the circle is the base for the patern, the 2nd part to look at is that there are 2 triangles in one, then sqare and trianles withe diffrent colours
Damn bro, got the same scores on the Norway and Dk. How is it possible that your scores on these tests are so different than the official one? I have a friend who scored about the same as me, but also scored about 130~ at the psychologist.
For Exercise 17 on the Norwegian, your answer is wrong. The pattern is that it increases a bit clockwise then faces the opposite way. Therefore, correct answer is E.
@@wrttech422 Bruh I got a 124 on the Denmark test but an 89 on the Sweden one. Then I got a 105 on Norway. I think if I were to take a real IQ test it would explode from confusion on my answers.
I got for Norway, Denmark and sweden accordingly: 135, 126 and 119. Also i bought an iq test online of the spanish version and i got 98 out of which 116 was about reasoning, 106 was about finding patterns and 88 about visual figures (i was tired and didnt pay much attention) so what im only sure about is that my iq must be +100
Got 133 on Norway, 121 on Denmark, maxed out on Sweden. I'm going to do the practice test and if it's at least 130 then I'll go for the real Mensa test
For all 3 (all first try): Norway: 131 Denmark: 124 Sweden: 126+ Average >= 127. I've always estimated myself at 120-140 based on descriptions of the IQ ranges, so this makes sense.
You are part of a small percentage but remember that its very easy to use iq against yourself and not as a tool to live a fulfilling life. a lot of people make that mistake.
i got a 115 before watching Denmark whenever I do these tests I somehow remember how to correctly spell and do math much like a review that reminds me of all that I've learned.
I'm not sure that's the case. If the data they're using to calibrate the IQ curve has people guessing in it, then you not guessing is just artificially deflating your own score.
you scored approximately in the 90-91st percentile, so in a room full of 100 people, you would rank as the 10th or 9th person. You certainly do seem to recognize patterns quite well, but that's not really the same as being clever, I'd claim.
@@TheVeganFreediver Same, 120 is quite common if you live an average life, if you spend 3 hours walking in London you’d probably see more than 5000 people, subconsciously seeing a person with an IQ of 150+ would be inevitable.
Norway- 115 Sweden- 126+ Denmark- 121 arealme- 117 I’m still not sure what my estimated iq is, after seeing these scores, I would love to have your opinion as to what it is, I’m 14 btw.
It is very hard to tell what your estimated IQ is, since you are 14 years old (btw I’m also 14 😊). But I would think your IQ is approximately 125…I mean…you can improve that score to get it to a higher level (maybe around 131 very gifted). I did that with a lot of training and I increased my visual intelligence and got 135 on the danish IQ test. Thereafter I trained and got a 145+ on the Norway test
@@bork5230 you cant increase your iq. You rather can practice how good you are at taking the test but i mean you shouldnt practice for an iq test bc the results are gonna be inaccurate. (Sorry for my terrible english)
Says my iq > 200
Ayo you would’ve been in college by, what, age 12?
@@abbyd7897 9
Lol
System's glitch😂
Lies
It said: "Your score was too low. An euthanasia squad is being deployed to your location."
ahhahahahahah
Lol 😅😅😅
5 months and we haven’t heard from him, he’s had a good run
😂😂😂😂😂
@@ChrisPBacon-yt8hi Result of IQ Test
Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data. any idea why please? :D
Dude, we are so alike. Very similar interests. I think you have insane potential to become a very big channel.
yeah, same here, but I'm guessing he's an older guy (like late 20s - 30s).
question 23 15:41 the answer is F
you need 3 black circles per row, 3 white triangles per row, 1 black triangle per row, 1 black square per row, and 1 white square per row. As for the shape patterns the bottom row is just the top row flipped on a Y axis.
Got the same result, different approach: Diagonally, top right to bottom left, the rows contain the same shapes, but they are always offset one to the left, with the one coming off on the left side coming back in from the right.
What was my IQ, you ask?
IT'S OVER 9000!!!
An intelligence test has many other types of problems other than the shapes. Many years back I was given a test that a psychologist used--(I think it was the WAIS) and it put me around 130. Most of the online ones will get me in the 125-135 range.
this only tests fluid but has high correlation to g.
@@wrttech422 The correlation to result in WAIS is only 0.6 or something if I remember correctly. It correlates very well with some individuals but not for others.
@@achyuththouta6957 that's because these only test fluid intelligence while the wais also measures crystallized intelligence
www.simplypsychology.org/fluid-crystallized-intelligence.html#:~:text=The%20Wechsler%20Adult%20Intelligence%20Scale,(Kaufman%20%26%20Lichtenberger%202006).&text=Most%20of%20these%20verbal%20tests,capable%20of%20measuring%20crystallized%20intelligence.
The correlation between these tests and Ravens progressive matrices is significantly higher.
so that this mean that the WAIS which is quite reliable is just the same with the the online ones? only differ in points?
I’ve gotten anywhere from 125-134 online too. These tests seem somewhat bullshit anyway, but they probably have some validity in measuring fluid intelligence
i'm sure you will score higher if you let your brain relax after 1 test
yah, probably just a little bit higher
I maximum score on the sweden sample test the (last one) is 126 said in the policy so basically got the full mark on it
@@ivartheboneless5745 Cheers! I was panicking when taking the Norway one :107. Calmed down and took the Denmark one today: 121
@@blutz6966 nice
for me
average other websites iq quizes: 135
average mensa iq quizes: 117-123
Haahah!
The other ones are set to give u 130s and stuff. I tried on a test and then pressed the answers I knew were wrong and, NO WAY, I got the same score again!
Mine in another website: 170 IQ
Mine in mensa iq quiz: 118
Lmao any other test that aren’t Mensa place me at 140+ IQ but the Mensa test place me at around the 120 range which is far more accurate.
@@anthonystevens6999 Me too, even on the Raven's progressive matrices IQ test I got 140, but only 128 on the Mensa's one
exercise 23: each row had 3 blackened circles, 1 triangle and 1 square. So the answer had to be a blackened circle and a triangle. And the 1st and 3rd rows seem to be reversed with the order of the shapes so i picked F.
That seems logical. Good catch
Exactly brother the correct answer is F not D
Yay, I'm smarter than i thought. 133 in NO and 138 in DK. But i did not understand couple of the last ones in DK. When i watched you struggle with them i finally understood some of them but not the last one. I rly enjoyed the symmetry in the DK test.
At least the 2nd to last one in DK is they the column of colors move down 1 space and the colors in each column move to the right 1 space. The last 1 idk
Those scores are pretty impressive!
The last one in DK (39) is pretty hard, but it becomes evident once you see the solution. In each box, take the first two columns and shift them to the right in the next box according to the following rules: square -> circle, circle -> triangle, triangle -> square.
To demonstrate this, I will use coordinates like (x,y), where x describes the row of the given box, and y refers to the column of the box. In the first row of the puzzle, we look at the first and second figures inside the box, which are (1,1) square, and (1,2) triangle. In the next box, we shift and change them according to the rules. We can see that indeed, (1,2) of the second box is a circle (1,1 square -> 1,2 circle), and (1,3) is a square (1,2 triangle -> 1,3 square). You can confirm that it works for every row of each box in the puzzle.
In order to get the answer, we look at the middle box of the last column and focus on the first two columns within the box. The transformations to the third box (i.e. the answer) will look like this:
(1,1) square -> (1,2) circle
(1,2) square -> (1,3) circle
(2,1) triangle -> (2,2) square
(2,2) triangle -> (2,3) square
(3,1) triangle -> (3,2) square
(3,2) square -> (3,3) circle
The only answer that has this combination of figures in the last two columns is F
I passed these three tests and my results are: 1) 102 points, 2) 109 points, 3) 103 points. I also once passed the Raven matrix test, where I scored 110 points, in the description of the result it was written that I had an outstanding intellect, in turn, I would not say that about myself. I feel very stupid, I wish I hadn't been born. Thank you for the video.
Tf
@@jacktheslayer-id5so What?
@@ВасилийАфанасьев-п1я you wish you haven't been born and you feel stupid, dude are you hearing yourself
@@jacktheslayer-id5so I hear myself. What is it about my proposal that you don't understand? It is hard to live with low intelligence in this world, those who have high intelligence have all the doors open in front of them, but of course, you also need to have motivation in order to achieve something.
@@ВасилийАфанасьев-п1я i just got a 142 on the mensa norway and i can say with absolute certainty that it does not matter. why? because it's nothing worth stroking your cock over.
have you heard of the chinese gaokao test? i know someone who scored VERY high and got into a prestigious school; extremely high iq. he makes 70k now. i know someone else who scored fairly low. ended up going to a state school in the US. makes 500k now. his iq wasnt high, but his emotional intelligence was something else. iq can only get you so far, but eq is what truly defines success. those with people skills tend to dominate mere pattern-recognizing machines.
you overestimate iq. eq is what matters, and eq is actually trainable unlike iq.
besides, you score consistently above average. is that really something to kick yourself over? you're smarter than most of the people you meet. that sounds pretty good to me.
The answer for 38 is A.
You need to keep track of it as you'd do in Sudokus. No same color in the same row or line.
Mine were:
Norway: 135
Denmark: 138
Sweden: 126+
I never would've thought of that. Good catch and good scores
I think that is a Rubic cube, so the colours cant overlap position. I think is C, but i am not quite sure. The reason is that in others answers, some colours overlap..
Btw mine is 133 on Norwey?
I did Denmark test too, but that was long ago, so i dont remeber the score.
I'm 15 years old and my test result was 145. I also tried another IQ test and it was around 140. Is it normal to get that big at 15?
@@eki6020 Stop boasting and join Mensa, all I comprehend is you're gifted even if its in the lower ranges.
@@eki6020 You have that high of an IQ but you can't answer your own simple question?
In the comment section the new average is 130!
also on the second test i think 22 is E because a square must appear in each row
Question 38: Answer is A
Just look diagonal from top left to bottom right and you will see, every row goes one step down.
Denmark-106 Sweden-89 Finland-101 Norway-95.
4?
@wise idiot talks That isn't good at all, stop lying to him.
how do you guys get a higher denmark score than norway? The denmark one was sooooo much harder than the norway one for me. Like it's not even close.
@@ysf-d9i denmark one maybe the colours?
also denmark one gives you more time which eases your brain a little
On the Mensa Norway test, you were supposed to click "Next" on the answers you did not know, rather than picking a letter at random because it changes your final score.
Yea but what if you click something right😅
Picking an answer is stupid. They should increase the number of offered answers and increase time
It says there's no penalty for wrong answers, so i don't get your criticism.
On my IQ test in 7th grade I got around 125 got taken again recently and got 95 so I've got dumb over time in a sense
IQ Tests for kids are way easier
Doesn’t ur iq stay the same during ur life but it can have like tiny changes
i enjoy watching this videos just for the sake of comparing my thought process
Norway - 128
Denmark - 130
Sweden - 126
(128+130+126) / 3 = 128 IQ
I feel kind of disappointed on myself. I'm from Mexico.
You definitely shouldn't.
128 would be appx 96th or 97th percentile. In a room full of 100 people taking the tests, you would rank 4th or 3rd place. You really, definitely shouldn't be disappointed.
i did an iq test i got 105
. Is that good?
@@eleven_11666 It's good, but I recommend you to do more IQ test in order to get an approximate to your real IQ.
Ooh imma try these out. Always wanted to. Never got one scheduled yet.
*scheduled*
Intelligence is not something to be proud of
I’m not talking about hard work, or anything like that, but run-of-the-mill intelligence, the kind that means you can put less effort into learning things and still do well/understand stuff better than other people. People get so much praise for it and I see no point or merit in that.
Feeling proud of being smart is as empty and meaningless as feeling proud for being beautiful. It’s not something you created or worked towards, it’s an arbitrary characteristic completely out of your control that you were born with.
It’s pointless to feel proud of something that’s totally out of your hands. It doesn’t reflect on the kind of person you are. What’s more important is the decisions you make, how you behave, and what you do with the hand you’re given in life. Those are things to be proud of.
well said!
Except intelligence can be worked towards. You can gain intelligence with practice and effort. Human beings should have pride in their intelligence, it's what got humanity this far, and will be the what gets us farther. People can also work on their body image through exercise, and self care. There's nothing wrong with being prideful about it as long as you're not doing it to the extent of being a narcissist. Ask yourself if you're projecting your own insecurities.
Something a brainlet would say
bro the way you explained exercise 29 in the first iq test made me scream my man you are the man, i literally hyped the fuck out of you when you found the solution because it brought me the solution also.
Denmark=124
Sweden= 126
Norway= 121
Okay back to my normal life
Got excactly the same lol
Damn same marks as mine
Is that accuracy bcause everyone got 120+
@@josegeermano9537 Dude everyone is averaging above 120+ in the comments, unless people with high I.Q. are more likely to seek out I.Q. tests or those who perform well are more likely to report their scores or they lie, it just doesn't seem distributed correctly where are the people that got 100, 90, 105? Like does everyone have very superior intelligence here??
@user-ib4xc9dy4k esas puntaciones son muy buenas. Si eso realmente es tu I.Q. eres a menos en el top 16%!
Norway: 135
Denmark: 140
Sweden: 126+
Age: 18
I got close to you then, i got 133 on Norway, 132 on Denmark and 126+ on Sweden. I'm 14 years old.
I got 133 on norway, 128 on denmark and 126+ on sweden.
I'm still in 7th grade
Also i witnessed many people in real life taking these tests ages 20 to 25 and rarely someone would score above 120.Contrary to what the media say these tests are also very good at predicting social and emotional intelligence as studies show.There is a substantial correlation between iq and socioemotional cognition which is also found in the brain.If you got a high score be thankful because you didn't do anything to earn it.
There is no social intelligence. It is called social competence. Doh
@@stellar2percent Basically there is but you can't measure it.But it's also a skill so you can call it social awareness.Anything that is a skill has a genetic component to that.
you sure? smart people I know are all pretty weird. I'm around 135-140, and I just don't understand people. It's like dumb arguments full of logical fallacies they eat up like it's the word of god, while logically sound arguments make them go like "bro that's the stupidest thing I ever heard".
It's so hard to understand how to speak in a way that's convincing to normies. And to be clear, I don't think I'm a genius or anything; I know people who are far smarter than me. But at least, when they point out the holes in my logic, I can understand it. Or at least, i can understand that there's something I'm not understanding that they are.
The Norwegian was much easier than all the IQ tests I do for jobs, and I get slightly above average on those. Plus this pase is slower than mine. My scores are compared to people within my field of work, but that would mean that my colleagues would all be in Mensa, which is of course not likely.
Thank you for recording this 😊
Hi Guys, I'm from Somalia.
Norway: 73
Deanmark: 69
Sweden: 63
It's impressive
@@dungtranmanh7820 For someone where he is from yes lol
@@teru797 This most definitely arises from miseducation.
Thats fucked up
@@elsimeon.5865 Maybe. It probably explains some. However most experts in the field believe that the heritability of IQ is somewhere around 60%
I've taken three proctored iq tests in total starting from adolescence to date, and I've scored from 135 to 145. Each test was completely different. For those whom think they will study such that they can inflate their score somehow before taking the test is sorely mistaken. Sure, you can study vocab and read a lot to inflate verbal fluency, or practice geographical quizzes that test for location and distance. You could perhaps even practice with numbers, memorization and counting. Or, you could learn strategies for solving visual puzzles; but this will only increase your score by like 3 points at most. The test is generally concerned with how many questions you get correct with time remaining: that is, your agility and endurance, which plays a pretty significant role in iq and G-factor.. which cannot be faked or practiced.
I mean I finished the norway one with 138, but like 10 mins left over, and I wasn't super focused and spent the first minute fixing my screen so it all fit without me having to scroll...
the problem isn't with time, it's that I don't know what kinds of patterns the other questions require. IF I had seen the answers and learned of the patterns they're using, I would likely be able to solve them all even with a completely different set of questions cuz you only need to know the logic behind it.
Wow, I never new IQ tests were based on visual linear shapes and patterns. Seems pretty limited if you ask me.
ya right. these are just some pattern based questions.
but IQ is determined on how much you can understand.
These types of tests are nowhere near a real IQ test. People whom use them to measure their intelligence against others (while actually believing it are valid tests) are morons and should seek professional help (where their true IQ probably will be measured). Because I have autism and chronic depression, my intelligence has been measured on multiple occasions when I reached out for help. I score 99 percentile in most online tests while my actual valid professional taken IQ tests are nowhere near of that (still score very bright, the 4 tests I have been mandated in my life were always around 122 give or take 1-5 points. But it's definitely not the 150's 160's I score in online tests)
Kinda like using new instead of knew
@@Headhunterspeedshop Actually some of the smartest people I know can't spell worth a damn. Has nothing to do with IQ. Neither do typos 😉
@@nohatebuttruth7941 isn't pattern recognition smth to understand
It says, "Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data."
Hahaha!!
Dude you broke the system
You need to answer the questions correctly to get a score, it's going to tell you that exact message if you randomly answer through each question. First I got a score of 145+ and because I was curious, I tried doing it again by clicking randomly and got that exact message as well.
Either you answered too many of the questions wrong or you just skipped all them.
U outsmarted the test lol
Norway: 125
Denmark: 130
Sweden: 126
My IQ : (125+126+130)/3
127
Your IQ is actually 123 (119-127 95% confidence interval). I know this because I can literally just tell. High IQ individuals such as myself are extremely proficient at holistic analysis and Freudian reductions upon minimal, but liminal, information.
@@ngle4246 Are U sure?What's Your IQ?
@@jamestungnung9514253
Fluous fucking cap
@@ngle4246 Lmfao
So many geniuses in this comment section made me feel dumb, i scored 110 on the norway one, 115 on the denmark one
Hey dont feel bad, i also just above average but not genius also mine was 121 on denmark, dont feel sad with iq bc it doesnt use enough in our world/ daily life. Most of our life we need knowledge to do something . Iq makes easier to understand the knowledge. Like maths, we learn maths to know how to count but iq makes u be able to explore what's inside the count and make use of it. Thats why we seen many ppl who had iq can elaborate something to be better. Thats just it. It helps u to be the top in humanity, thats all. Since im just above average, all i wanted was a good happy life. It doesnt guud tho if u get a genius iq but doesnt had a happy life. But still being above average we still could see something a bit that average ppl couldn't see you should be happy with that ! :D
ITS OK TO NOT BE GENIUS, an iq of above average is a gift for u, appreciate it :).
i have 105 lol
@@erlangga1953 well its ok tho. :)
I scored 133 on the Norway test, but I've done 10 of these types of tests in my life so practice can definitely affect it.
Norway: 110
Denmark: 123
Swedan: 126
Not bad for a 17 year old.
@@angelDanJonathan It peaks at age 20 and then starts declining. Your IQ test will not reflect that though as your IQ will remain in the same ballpark for a majority of your life.
@@oskarsverdrup9906 Oh ok
Acum mai multe zile la un test mensa cel mai exact test din lume mi-a ieșit iq-ul 122,iar acum in ziua de azi am făcut un test foarte exact și mi-a ieșit iq-ul 120,și mi-a scris și certificat dar m-a pus sa scriu și numele,mă bucur de aceste IQ-uri bune.
Mensa Norway: 131
Mensa Denmark: 124
Mensa Sweden: 126
Norway & Sweden - maxed out
Finland - 133
Denmark - 136
Funny, I took the Norway test and got 98. I assume my adhd interfered because I was constantly daydreaming and didn't finish it in time. I took it a second time with a bit more discipline and got 108. A few months later, I took the Denmark test and got 123, Finnish (121), and Hungarian (120). I would like to think the three last tests give a more accurate representation given they show a good score. However, maybe there was a practice effect from the two times I took the Norway test that led to improvement. If this were the case, I don't know how to gauge what my score range is.
Add them all up at divide by 4 to get ur mean?
@Noah Joseph No, but the thing is, each test has different kinds of questions. All of these questions are figure series type questions, and the only way to gauge my IQ for these types of questions is to take an actual test. This is because the test can verify how well I generally answer these types of questions by giving a certain variety and quantity. Because of these factors, it's difficult to gauge an accurate mean.
I have ADD but I like doing Iq tests I got 130 on Denmark but my real iq is more like a 120 Iq, doing more gives you do knowledge of how to handle Iq problems. you seem to have 115iq
Because iq tests are so similar, you redoing them would obviously lead to a higher score. You probably have about 100-105.
@@jhhrollins Well, as far as I know, you can't "train" your IQ very much.
I had a 133, and one of my closest friends had an IQ of 138. However, I am diagnosed with ADHD, and in a more serious test I took by a psychiatrist, that also lowered the result (and the test really showed it particularly). I expect that it had affected this one too.
Anyway, glad that I seem to have enough (I hope) potential to excel at my passions.
Thank you for this video.
i got:
Norway:105
Deanmark:123
Sweden:119
That's weird, i got 138 in the Norway one and 119 in the Sweden one.
Norway seems to be weird
May I ask how old you are? Discrepancy among scores may be explained by that.
@@ngle4246 it's probably just somewhere in the middle
I also got quite high scores. Now I would love to have an IQ of 135 . But for me it feels a bit like they are trying to convince you to do a "real (paid) Mensa" test and thats why all our scores are so high...
Denmark: 123
Norway: 133
Sweden: 122
Thank you for this!
In the Danish test: isn't A the answer to exercise 38, rather than H? With H, the white box ends up in the same horizontal line as the white box of the figure directly above. There is no such overlap with any coloured box if you choose A.
Dam y’all getting above 120 while I got 105.
Me too
bruh lol same here
That's fine, that is average.
I got 109 on Denmark
@@atlasatc 124on Denmark, but I still feel dumb
The right answer in 23 is F (first test). If you want further explanation why, I can explain.
Plz explain
@@rightbackdong6113satır ve sütunda eksik olan siyah üçgen beyaz kare beyaz üçgen gibi şeylere bakarsan bulabilirsin
My scores on my first tries:
Norway: 125
Denmark: 126
Sweden: 126
So I'm basically averaging 126 IQ
w thats pretty high either way
The score that i got on mensa Norway first try was 128 (anxious) and after taking it again 135.In the mensa Denmark and Finland i took them almost two years ago (i don't remember the scores) and now i took them again and scored in both 135.Mensa Sweeden max 126.
I recently got 142 on full scale real iq test and 145 on spatial specifically.In Greece the average iq is 92.
Is it free
Taking the test twice is not that good tho, first try Norway I got 135 and second try I got 145, which is a huge gap tbh
@@tengu8560 it warms up your brain wouldn’t be sunrise if it’s a huge gao
So you are saying that these online tests in this video are actually harder than the real deal, it seems like everyone in the comments is at least getting 120 on these online tests, but that may be because people who score well are more likely to report their score in comments or people who are interested in taking I.Q. tests are on average higher I.Q.'d. Nevertheless, well done on your scores, what was the name of the official test you took in Greece out of curiosity??
Re taking the same test does not mean your iq got higher, you can only account your first score. Once you take it once your brain remembers patterns.
Hey man, as far as I can see, your score, as well as mine and svensk8squad´s score (who commented here too), indicate that Mensa Denmark gives you a 5 points lower IQ compared to Norway. I did the Mensa Admission Test and asked my percentile and maybe my result is higher cause I might have left unchecked some answers put in the wrong question if I ever did it more than once (just conspiracy) after I rechecked it, but my official score indicates what I expected: Norway lies 15 points more from the official IQ (in reality it captures from 70 to 130, duh) and Denmark 10 points (caps at 70, but goes till 135 for some reason). Nice video and insights about the topic!
but if he got 131+ on official and 138 on Norway it means that site is correct about his iq, maybe you`re just trained for this kind of tasks after official iq test
I beg to differ. The most difficult tasks on Mensa Norway are NOT 130 IQ level. Like Q32-35, it requires ridiculous abstraction for a 130 IQ to get EVERY QUESTION RIGHT. I've never seen anyone get all questions right on Mensa Norway in the time limit. In summary, I think it inflates the lower IQ people's score and deflates the higher IQ people's score. So, both tests are inaccurate, and inflate everybody's score to make them pay for IQ tests when in actuality you're all AVERAGE, if not, below average.
Not to mention, the tests don't account for age! I'm 10 and I scored 142 on Mensa Norway, and 138 on Denmark. However, I'm held to the same standard as an 18 year old?!?! How is this supposed to be indicitive of my true g-factor when I'm held to the same standard as someone 8 years older than me? And yes, I know they explicitly mention that people under 16 shouldn't take Mensa Norway for accurate results. However, the tests still don't account for age at the higher intellects. They have no concept of proliferating fluid intelligence as a result of age, and so therefore these tests are merely devised by greedy people who get people to play into the concept of g. Until these tests ameliorate age factorization, I will continue to loathe the concept of g.
Mensa Norway - 138
Mensa Denmark - 143
Mensa Sweden - 126
I've took multiple IQ tests and score higher than a 138, so it should be at around a 140, but if I recall, then around a 138-143, so a 140/141. I've never took the SAT/ACT yet because I'm in 10th lol
Take the SACFT
@@VintageMusic729 hi I Took the SACFT test And I Got 28 out of 36 questions right it said that my iq score is 144 i think that's a bit of a stretch is it created by mensa?
Norway: 133, which is surprising since I guessed on the last 3 or 4 and finished early
Denmark: 123
Sweden: 126<
I just guessed on the last 6-7 questions for the Denmark, got bored I guess
This was so awesome!!
Mine were:
Norway-145+
Denmark-138
Sweden-126+
Finland-143
What is up with these country names, can you explain?
@@nabihassan7576 watch the goddamn video -_-
@@nabihassan7576 so they have different sites based on countries and different tests with different way of scoring too. Hope that helps.
I love how everyone.got over 120 on the comments I don't know if it's because they are lying or because the teste is giving higher iq than what's suppose
@@sofiaholzner1290 thats a very strong point
@@sofiaholzner1290 If they are so smart shouldn't they know that sharing their IQ test scores here is pointless because no one really cares?
@@sofiaholzner1290 Yep, a self-selected group. Standard behavioral psychology stuff.
Sample bias
Test - Mensa Denmark
Results
Your IQ is intended to be:130
Calculated using scatter 15
norway: 145
denmark: 134
sweden: 132
age: 13
hotel: trivago
youre so smart you score higher than what is even possible on the Sweden test
Haha
Thank you for this!
In the Norway test: isn't C the answer to exercise 14, rather than A? The figure rotates 45 degrees 1 time and 90 degrees 1time on each row/column.
Mensa Norway: 135
Mensa Denmark: 128
Mensa Sweden: 126+ (max)
Mensa Hungary: 126+ (max)
Mensa Finland: 130
Soooo??? I honestly am shocked with this result since I get alot of bad grades in school.... ouch
Edit: I added mensa Finland
A high iq doesn't mean youll make good grades, it just means youll likely be able to make higher grades than the average person with less study. Like wrt tech stated in this video, these tests were not meant to replace a psychologist proctored IQ test, and you should take your scores with a grain of salt. These mensa tests also only test fluid intelligence, and lack the crystalized section to give you a G score.
I think IQ has do with the way your brain works like understanding simple things with no explanations and a faster brain over all
Q32 would be A. Columns check, what they have in common will flip vertically
Its fascinating how so many geniuses are in the comment section of a youtube video. 😂😂 Sarcasm intended
I took the first test only and got bored after answering 29 questions and scored a 97 lol
Lel
same ahah
Yeah i attempted 30, and scored 121 norway
lmao same
about right
9:58 so this one was one of the easier ones for me
The first time it rotates half a 90`, so 45`, instead of moving to the 90` (45+45) it goes further, meaning it moved 90`
Took me 4 sec to figure it out I got a 223 on some random test online can’t be real
@@IllllIIIIllIlllIIl they want to you to spend money right? Moneyyyyyyy
This is very simple in the sense that it has no great relevance I greatly prefer the dual n-backs!!!
Norway:133
Denmark:128
Sweden:126
I'm still 13 year old though does that effect the result?
Norway: 133.
Denmark: 130.
Sweden: 126+.
Finland: 130+.
Tero41: 130.
Octagon: 136.
Zolly Darko Test: 131.
Hungary: 125+.
Octagon is accurate?
impresum please tell me i scored at Tero41 first time and showed me that i have - Congratulations your result is SUPERIOR now it triggers me to pay now? or ...
Why is everyone so smart here
Sweden: 126
Denmark: 128
Norway: 131
Question 21 of the first test was E, not B. The first row adds parts when over lapped, the second row subtracts parts when they overlap. To continue the pattern, the third row must add parts when overlapping.
Short answer : you are wrong
Long anwer : First of all it's not just about adding parts or subtracting parts , it's about adding what is uncommon and subtracting what is common. Now in the first row there is no common part except for some points so they add up. Now you may say the points didn't subtract. But look at the 2nd row of the question 11 , here 1 st image should subtract from 2 nd image but here also the points didn't get erase. The iq test is wrong here I guess. If anyone reads this please comment back have you understood my point or not. No pun intended.
No, in the first row there was nothing to subtract because there was nothing they had in common, on the second row, what overlapped (what they had in common) got subtracted and what they didn't have in common was added. If you study the pattern you would come to the conclusion that B is the correct answer.
denmark - 123
norway - 112
sweden - 110
official - 115
My age - 16
So which is which.... i think denmark was accurate cuz the others i guessed and time ran out
You had an official iq test done, and scored 115?
@@myfuzzyanimals67 yee
@@myfuzzyanimals67 yee
Consider your lowest iq scored..which is more accurate
Your are an average kind...and if you become 20 you could be able to score at least 115 iq..
Mensa Sweden : 126
Mensa Norway : 133
Mensa Denmark : 128
Is it possible for my actual iq to be between these numbers???
Your fluid IQ could be in that ballpark. Most of the online mensa tests have been normed.
@@myfuzzyanimals67 Thanks for your reply!
you're intelligent, same as me
@@dungtranmanh7820 nice!
Most likely, the best approximation you can do is get the average (129), a proctored test would see to your true score though.
Sweden: 126 +
Norway: 131
Denmark: 113
i got 100 104 123 in that order go figure
I got the almost the same for Denmark
On question 35 of test #2 is it reasonable to assume we are supposed to take C and turn the square on its side. That will give us the 4 red squares in the top right quadrant and the 4 blue squares in the top left.
The way that I solved it was: for each one of the rows - take the left tile and rotate it 90 degrees to the right. Then take the second picture and swap the cube in any of the gray tiles to the other gray tile, and then rotate the figure 90 degrees to the left and that's your solution. Using that logic you also get that C is the correct solution.
Norway 125
Sweden 122
Denmark 124
Finland 125
Hungary 125
Where did you get Finland and Hungary?
Guys... guys... guys. These tests often have a max score. Mensa Hungary gives you a max score of 125+.
Great video! I got a better understanding thanks!
Great to hear!
Mensa Norway: 128.
Mensa Denmark: 123.
Mensa Sweden: 119.
Norway: 138
Denmark: 135
Sweden : 126
Sweden one seems way easier than the others...
because its capped at 126. The others test up to 145, and need questions hard enough to do so.
17 is a 45 degree rotation followed by a 90 degree rotation.D is the correct answer.
Very good proposal. I do think most tests are only good to separate who is gifted and who is not, and they are not useful to really measure intelligence.
@hitler did noting worong yeah, it’s just a metric for evaluating how your brain works in one way. In this case, it’s for the purpose of pattern recognition. It has been said (misattributed to Stephen Hawking although no such proof exists) that “intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.” I tend to agree with that sort of sentiment...I’ve seen stupid people be brilliant and brilliant people be stupid, and either in positions unbefitting of what we’d conventionally expect.
at 50:38 it looks like the grey squares move counter clockwise and that tells you which squares are going to bo colored in, you just do that then also with the first squares with the red and blue colors you just inverse the colors (if red is left of blue its on the right..etc) I think it's D
It's F, I believe. There are three distinct form that have additional 2 form that are equally formed, yet the color moves by one block and so the others follow.
forms*
Norway -138
Denmark -130
Sweden -116
Official -115
Edit : Official test taken 3 years ago
Really, thats wierd... I scored like 131 on the Norway one and 130 on the Denmark one (with distractions tho). I also have a friend that also scored 131 on the Norway one and she got similar results on a test at the psychologist(130~). Soo yea your results are odd.
@@teoteo3522 I know, I'm just really inconsistent and easily distracted so maybe those factors affected my scores in some way??? Idk but I'm pretty average and kinda stupid irl so If I were to score myself I'd say my Iq is around 110 - 120 or something.
15:40 the circle is the base for the patern, the 2nd part to look at is that there are 2 triangles in one, then sqare and trianles withe diffrent colours
Denmark: 12
Norway: 17
Sweden: 14
How old are you
@@thethoughtiwasasian8866 130+
Apparently my iq is 32
Your IQ lies outside the area that the test is able to measure. We are hoping to extend this area as soon as we have gathered more data.
Oh ohh negative iq ;)
There are actually two solutions to exercise nr. 24! (B and F)
Norway: 131
Dk: 130
Sweden: 126+
Yes I'm a gamer that has accomplished nothing at all 😎
Edit: I got 142 on the real test.
@@manguy6366 I KNOW RIGHT !! 5HEAD
@@manguy6366 No it’s legit only in the top 2%, in another perspective, around 150 million people have an IQ equal to his or more than his.
Damn bro, got the same scores on the Norway and Dk. How is it possible that your scores on these tests are so different than the official one? I have a friend who scored about the same as me, but also scored about 130~ at the psychologist.
Same, I got 143 on WISC IV, but I scored 133 on Mensa Denmark, 126+ on Mensa Sweden, 135 on Mensa Norway and 138 on Mensa Finland.
@@leonardomarchi8980 What percentile is 143 acording to that test?
For Exercise 17 on the Norwegian, your answer is wrong. The pattern is that it increases a bit clockwise then faces the opposite way. Therefore, correct answer is E.
Mensa Norway: 91
Mensa Denmark: 132
Mensa Sweden: 126+
ok
lol I don't believe you.
@@wrttech422 I missclicked finish xD
@@avion332. that makes sense lol
@@wrttech422 Bruh I got a 124 on the Denmark test but an 89 on the Sweden one. Then I got a 105 on Norway. I think if I were to take a real IQ test it would explode from confusion on my answers.
Norway: 133
Denmark: 123
Sweden: didn’t take it yet
I got for Norway, Denmark and sweden accordingly: 135, 126 and 119. Also i bought an iq test online of the spanish version and i got 98 out of which 116 was about reasoning, 106 was about finding patterns and 88 about visual figures (i was tired and didnt pay much attention) so what im only sure about is that my iq must be +100
Test - Mensa Denmark
Results
Your IQ is intended to be:130
Calculated using scatter 15
tired??.. you're weak..
These tests got my toes fidgeting lol, got 121 but I remember getting 130 before
37:22
Number 22 i think it's should be E?
Yeah, E was correct
Got 133 on Norway, 121 on Denmark, maxed out on Sweden. I'm going to do the practice test and if it's at least 130 then I'll go for the real Mensa test
U fuckin genius 😀
How did you do on the real one tho?)
@@nikubiti8599 Planning on taking it this summer
@@silloweet oh, I see, wish you luck (:
For all 3 (all first try):
Norway: 131
Denmark: 124
Sweden: 126+
Average >= 127.
I've always estimated myself at 120-140 based on descriptions of the IQ ranges, so this makes sense.
You are part of a small percentage but remember that its very easy to use iq against yourself and not as a tool to live a fulfilling life. a lot of people make that mistake.
My average is 123 points and I'm 51 year old male.
Average ≥ 127 :)) (option + > on macOS, alt + 242 (type on numpad with num lock enabled))
@@PakistanIcecream000 i got 122 and im 12 years old
@@omaralmurtadhay1239 keep up the good work and make sure your IQ stays the same when you grow old.
Norway: 128 (i was tired)
Denmark: 130
Sweden: 126+ (max)
Hungary: 125+ (max)
Finland: 130
I got 99 percent on the first iq test I was shock lol
It’s not percent😂
i got a 115 before watching Denmark whenever I do these tests I somehow remember how to correctly spell and do math much like a review that reminds me of all that I've learned.
Mensa Norway: 108
Mensa Denmark: 112
It goes without saying that you shouldn't guess...All the variations are due to correct guesses
I'm not sure that's the case. If the data they're using to calibrate the IQ curve has people guessing in it, then you not guessing is just artificially deflating your own score.
Norway iq - 121 denmark iq 121 sweden iq 122. Am I considered clever?
you scored approximately in the 90-91st percentile, so in a room full of 100 people, you would rank as the 10th or 9th person. You certainly do seem to recognize patterns quite well, but that's not really the same as being clever, I'd claim.
@@TheVeganFreediver Same, 120 is quite common if you live an average life, if you spend 3 hours walking in London you’d probably see more than 5000 people, subconsciously seeing a person with an IQ of 150+ would be inevitable.
Sweden: who
Denmark: fucking
Norway: cares
Norway- 115
Sweden- 126+
Denmark- 121
arealme- 117
I’m still not sure what my estimated iq is, after seeing these scores, I would love to have your opinion as to what it is, I’m 14 btw.
It is very hard to tell what your estimated IQ is, since you are 14 years old (btw I’m also 14 😊). But I would think your IQ is approximately 125…I mean…you can improve that score to get it to a higher level (maybe around 131 very gifted). I did that with a lot of training and I increased my visual intelligence and got 135 on the danish IQ test. Thereafter I trained and got a 145+ on the Norway test
@@bork5230 you cant increase your iq. You rather can practice how good you are at taking the test but i mean you shouldnt practice for an iq test bc the results are gonna be inaccurate. (Sorry for my terrible english)
@@bork5230 its cope man, you can`t train yourself to pass iq tests cuz they`re meant to be completed in one try. Don`t lie to yourself