Of course man! These "speed tests" are for all kind of "sheeps". And as you saw here even with such differences on benchmark the real time performance is the same.
Of course matters.. Samsung in performance always sucks...lower performance or throttling or Higher power consumption .... In. Terms of optimization iphone is unbelievable ...
I feel these short burst speed tests are not anymore relevant for flagship phones given how much good the SOCs have become, you should compare the sustain performance under heavy load for these flagships
@@dj-rocketman8545 if three years ahead why whenever i play game they always dimm the screen to 20% brightnes and start to overheat like 46,47 degree and kill the battery after 1 year? Whenever i use my snapdragon 865,they always maintain at 42 degree and the performance is nearly indentical?
@@dj-rocketman8545 performance 3 years ahead while throttle in heavy games and dimm the screen to nearly unusable but still get hotter than snapdragons,great chipset Samsung always releases phones in January, isheeps can talk till then and snapdragons will keep wrecking you in games
It's because Samsung started to close apps that use a certain about of resources at a time to save battery you can disable it/change it in settings for how long apps can be open. But the iPhone to the cake this time.
App opening speeds stopped being an issue for me after iPhone 5S and up when it was new. Now, the benchmark should be how fast these phones are after years og use and wear and tear, measureing how they would hold up. There is simply no reason to test which phone opens up an app faster when they're new. I simply cannot see the benefit of on e or the other laucnhing RUclips 150ms faster. Now this also leads to which phone manufacturer keeps updating older phones the most. iPhone 6 and 6S is still having IOS updates, where Samsung usually leaves major updates out after 2-3 years. Longyevity would go to iPhone. As an example, in 2019 I got the Galaxy S10 +, as of today it isn't really "Slow" but I have started to see hiccups/stutters here and there that was non-existent when it was new. My wifes iPhone 8 is still going smooth and just as fast, only downside being the battery. And it has IOS 15! I simply cannot justify buying any Samsung device for that matter alone. Day one speed means nothing, longyevity does.
Yeah. I'm planning to switch from Samsung to Apple. Samsung's phones are just as, if not more expensive (due to higher depreciation of value) than iPhones. My phone still has bugs (GPS issue for months that went unfixed) but obviously Samsung doesn't care enough about their old customers
agreed, i had an s8 from launch and the way it stutters is nasty, had to install a custom rom, overclock the damn thing and still would lag compared to an iphone 7 plus which gets slightly hotter but doesnt lag even after half a decade
I also have a Samsung (S7 to be exact) and I also used to be an Apple hater. But the more I think about it and after many consideration, I wanna buy an iPhone lol. It last so long, I love the longevity of iPhone. And I still can't believe how the iPhone 6 still support an update (IOS 15), Despite almost 7 years? Great.
An Android phone is like a Windows PC, if you clean all the junk and keep the software clean, it runs the same speed as day one, the only difference is, newer phones become faster. From the S10 it's 3 years of updates and 5 years of security patches. If someone was really that bothered about keeping an old device, they could flash a custom rom with the latest Android version, you could even port the OS over yourself. There isn't one person o know though that keeps ap phone longer than 2 or 3 years, accept my Great Grandma.
The iphone 13 could easily last you a decade. I have an iphone 6 that was released seven years ago in 2014 and its still perfectly fine apart from its battery. In the iphone 13 nothing would get drastically worse over the years. Its battery life will still be fine, it's camera will still be great and it's processor will never struggle. It's absolutely worth it for me. 😄
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@Se7enGates lmao theres so much wrong with this comment it's funny. He wasn't disregarding the speeds of the s21 ultra, he was just praising the speeds of the pro max, so theres no need to fan droid over a man which is over a fking phone. The cameras are better? This opinion is entirely subjective, but arrogantly shitting on apples cameras is just irrelevant. And the pro max can actually charge at 27watts, while the s21 ultra charges at 25. Additionally, the pro max has a substantially smaller battery than the s21's 5000 milliamp hours which results the pro max to charge faster
I'm super excited for the Google Pixel pro 6 to have this test against it. I'm really hoping with this new chip that they've created, that it will hold its own against both of these phones. It really doesn't bother me if one wins and the other one loses back and forth on different experiences, if it averages out. Because then, I feel like all three fans are at least getting pretty great phones.
Google silicon was designed with Samsung's help. Their leaked SoC configuration is very weird but I'm sure they have reasons for that. I suspect that the performance will be better than Snapdragon 888 but in these kinds of tests it won't make a difference. Brute forcing "app opening" and "loading times" with hardware doesn't cut it anymore, developers now need to optimize their apps to use the power from these chips properly. I'm sure native Google apps will be buttery smooth though, their older Pixel had ridiculous speed considering the chips were mostly mid-tier but third party apps...it won't be really different from what you see in the video. These chips are getting too crazy for what they are needed. They should be slapping these in laptops #MoreM1sInTheWorld
@@maximusasauluk7359 yeah I'm not as scared as some are about the new chip configuration. I'm actually kind of excited to see what they're doing with that chip since it has two of the higher end and then showing that it's got a lower end chips also. I'm wondering if it's because it actually will make it more beneficial, in a wild way. Or if it will actually be a way of getting the price down. There's a lot of different opportunities about it, just everyone is wondering why they went a little lower on those middle cores. I'm curious how they're even going to market it! If they're going to justify their reasoning or if they're just going to gloss over it and not even worry about talking what others are thinking? And then there is the third option that I'm kind of hoping for, and that there is more than one SOC. And the SOC we saw is for the regular six and they'll be another configuration for the six pro. Doubtful. You are very correct though on the developer's side of things and I'm always trying to tell friends that in clans on games why they don't get an update before others, etc.
They are using 3rd generation old Arm cortex-A76 for maximum performance which is weird. I don't think pixel 6 series is gonna be fast as latest iPhones or s21,S22.
Most chips perform very well in short bursts but how is their sustained performance under load? That is the most important question for gaming and computation because one will usually start to see thermal throttling after around 5 to 10 minutes which devastates the performance - up to half of the peak performance as is the case with the furnace that is the Exynos 990. In future I'd like to see tests for sustained performance. 3D mark has a nice 20 minute test which shows the performance drop over time as temps increase.
Yea I'm wondering if apple is still forcing dimming after playing any heavy games for like 20-30mins, almost all phones in the last 5 years perform pretty much the same in short bursts
I’m so glad Samsung smoothed out the animations for games and other large apps. There’s nothing I hated more than seeing apps just pop open like it’s 2013. It always made the Samsung phones seem less capable compared to iPhones.
Why does no one acknowledge apples improvements? They make huge upgrades every year in terms of speed, but you only praise samsung for giving a 5% improvement? This just shows how biased you are.
even I am using S21 Ultra exynos variant. but i found that my geekbench scores are single core:466 and multi core:1755 rather than yours exynos variant (sungle core:1084 and muLti core:3492)...can I do anything about it..I am from India
@@babyyoda9943 tbh honest apple doesnt deserve praise for obs faking such Benchmark scores.... being so far ahead with benchmarks but noticing nothing in real life... why would u praise apple for such BS scores...
@Noah P same here I have 12 pro max and I’m also using s10+ and the camera quality looks like it’s from 1995 not joking 🙃 I’d rather miss a few gimmicks than have horrible ram, worse chip, worse video quality, and low light quality Not to mention the iPhone 12 and so on have much better durability, water resistance, and speed then all androids out right now
Okay this is just a fanboy comment, i have an s21 ultra and z fold 3.....and it's obvious that iphone 13 destroyed samsung unfortunately, but i am excited for the s22 ultra, hopefully the performance will be better than iphone 13
The raw performance of the A15 is absolutely insane, but for most people, it really will not make that huge of a difference. But, a considerably more powerful chip is always welcome and will be great for keeping a phone running smooth for a lot of years.
Honestly the chips is way more than fast enough for tasks heck my iPhone 12 mini can do all I want it to do with no limits it’s very fast but the only thing I would care about seeing is a 2gb ram increase in all iPhone models!
@@neutralbanda3215 Someone is sore that the iPhone, despite having a supposedly significantly faster chip, cannot even open games like this in the same time. iPhone fans need to face the fact that benchmarks mean little.
I’m an iPhone XS Max user, I will buy a 13 pro Max soon. I like both Apple and Samsung because both of them only compete each other. Samsung is the king of android being able to compete with apple. I gotta say Samsung and apple are the only ones sharing stuff like sharing the same screen. We apple users use screens made by Samsung whereas Samsung uses battery made by apple etc. It’s truly beautiful how they help each other out with stuff while users are fighting about who’s better. Idk who’s better, I think when it comes to being better it’s more about which software you prefer? iOS or Android? If you can answer that question, you know which device to buy🤷🏻♂️
So….opening Apps and doing normal day-to-day tasks all modern smartphones are plenty fast enough. Doing anything intensive (real work) the iPhone pulls way ahead. That render test is a perfect example. Going to get groceries a Toyota Camry is just as good as a Ferrari. Go to the track and it’s a different story.
@@albanos.13 1440p and super amoled display,. Bro, the Galaxy has always had better screen, the iPhone screen look like my 100 dollar phone on eye protection mode😶
@@samuraisings5105 it has a more contrast screen but compared them myself side by side even with an iPhone 11 pro it hasn’t that much of a difference so I can easily tell the brightness isn’t the same on this video
@@albanos.13 not to mention blasting the contrast is an easy way to trick a consumer into thinking it's a better display, which is why TVs do it in stores and Samsung does it to their photos and screens. I'm not sure if the S21 does it to their screens by default but in Linus's review of the new Fold, he was disgusted by the colors of the screen only to find out later it was set by default to be overly high contrast in the settings so he had to change it.
@@Krolitian1 and I have noticed most people keep their Samsung phone display in dynamic wich is much more contrast than normal wich I don’t prefer at all
Two great phones. Lets look at it this way. Android has come so far over the last couple of years. It’s literally up there with iOS. A few years ago android was buggy sloppy slow and stuttery. Now look at it. ! That in itself is enough for me.
@@PAWNB3YOND yep i used both and i still find ios hella boring and sometimes frustrating android has become a lot better and smoother especially on samsung with the 3 years of os updates still if u like ios then good for ya
Even though both screens have 120Hz it does seem to me that S21U looks smoother, the iPhone has these transition animations that look like what we call 'ghosting-effect' that happens in screens with lower refresh rates
@@lmao7197 it doesn't have to be, bro. We're watching a video on the performance differences of the iPhone vs the s21. The display quality is one of the differences I saw. It may not be 4k but 2k video watching on my s21 ultra is pretty amazing.
@@vmm132 Well thats what a tablet is for. I don't really consider the saturation/contrast of a phone screen, as long as it isn't abysmal. I'm just glad that they added 120hz to the 13 finally.
@@Aman-786 buy the iPhone and jailbreak. You would be able to do stuff you wouldn't be able to even with a rooted Samsung not to mention how Samsung intentionally fucks your phone forever after you root.
Apple is a 9 months ahead on their phones though, it’ll be more fair once s22 comes out imo. Still a nice test for people considering these phones tho! Edit: I meant 9 months ahead on their release cycle, not features.
@Asal Nidal There have been leaks that show the AMD x Exynos collab being up to 3x more performant in games compared to the A14. Either way we'll have to see, but even if the exynos does win imo things like refresh rate/touch smapling rate mater wayyyy more than a few extra fps, which is why people don't tend to use iPhones as a gaming phone.
@@indulekhasantosh9743 Sure, but any android phone can still deliver 120+ fps in games, and at that point, touch sampling rate and refresh rate are more important. Plus, the notch can be annoying and distracting.
Great speed test as always. You should not be surprised that the Geekbench scores are not representative of the actual performance, except in certain tasks that are not really necessary on a phone like video editing, every year the Samsungs hold there own. Considering the S21 is 8 months old and the Snapdragon may well be faster still. What was very clear from your video is that the gaming and video experience is far better without a notch.
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
Also should be much quicker in real use. Android 12 is 22% less cpu hogging New Linux kernel (acc a big deal bc its now mostly the mainline 5.10 kernel so it should run extra great) Arm v9 is 20% more efficient and faster The sd 898 will have brand new arm cores and be 4nm (5nm pushed to the max where they fixed all issues like heating and further pushed battery efficiency and power along with updating all other aspects of the chip like the isp ,gpu ,ai etc) Faster ram & storage. It'll also have a more energy efficient display Samsung e5 Android 12 -15 updates All the gimmicks will actually be pretty usable as the hardware can finally match the visions. No more lag or shit camera quality for all those dozens of modes and features. The display has also been nailed in the sense of screen to body ratio whilst still having enough to hold on to.
@@user-ud6xs8ly6e raw processing power no but actual use 100% . the only area the iPhone can even win is things like rendering times for video editing etc,that said that is like 5% of use cases so the s22 will feel more powerful even tho its just quicker. Like an electric car vs a muscle car.
@@cassidywilliams7187 no but it's almost October so it would be misleading to say 4months in a way, the s22 will be unveiled in January between the 7th & 14th roughly
Can't wait for the S22 Ultra note or whatever they're going to call it to see it up against the iphone 13. Next year's Samsung S series is going to be epic... The note and S line is going to merge💯💯💯💯💯😶😶
Nah I am not a fan of they decision...... rather having a hybrid phone Samsung can just get rid of the S22 ultra and make the S22 plus as the new S22 ultra..... after that they can release an actually Note 22 ultra with the perfect boxy design and in built spen
If l even if they are going with the decision then just put the body design just like the note 20 ultra and put in built spen and just call it as Note 22 ultra and not some S22 Note ultra or Note 22S then I will be happy..... But tbh that decision is kinda not good enough
Switching to Iphone 13 pro max after 6yrs of android , I feel like iOS has finally catched up when it comes to features along with its own perks, forget the back button will be tough tho! Nervous and excited at the same time. Will also get the 🍎watch and see how it goes.
Yes. These tests are completely subjective. And he is using the Exynos version which is inferior to Samsungs Qualcomm chip. I use the S21U and I never lag (SD888). But you are right.
@@Phoenix56801 Probably iOS 15 needs some optimization updates. It'll probably improve over the next few months. Like how iOS 14.1 improved iOS 14 massively.
Indeed. Unlike Apple, Samsung uses superior Super AMOLED screens. Which is more vibrant and has better color depth. The S22 is rumored to be mighty powerful. I look forward to it next year!
@@thenamestika Vibrant colors doesn’t make the display “better” the colors on the iPhone’s are so much realistic than the Samsung’s which makes the iPhone better for professionals
@@baranicer Vibrant colors make a huge difference. And no, iPhones don't have a more realistic look. PPI is higher on the Samsung phones, so naturally it has a better display. And professionals can use either phone lol, bland argument.
@@TCPUDPATM How pathetic that I am blind to fanaticism, I even synchronized the time it takes to load asphalt 9 on my grandmother's phone with a s10e and it is practically the same, open your eyes to the world because those who live on apple will always continue in a eternal dream
Crazy how well the S21 Ultra did against the latest and greatest IPhone. Would love to see a comparison with the snapdragon model as well. Seems synthetic benchmarks are far from the complete story of these devices
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@Se7enGates technically the galaxy s21 is samsung's 2021 phone option being released in January this year. The s22 isn't coming out until next year so the s21 ultra is the logical, best, and only option to compare with the best iPhone at the moment
I've always been a Samsung fan but honestly in my opinion even though Samsung's phones are good I don't like them anymore for a few reasons (Specifically the s21 ultra) 1. They removed the headphone jack 2. They removed the micro sd slot 3. Camera bump is too big 4. The curved display is barely even curved anymore And yes I understand that the iphonr 13 doesn't have a headphone jack and micro sd slot but at this point in my opinion they are similar enough that its just a matter of preference and I prefer the iphone 13 for a few reasons... 1. They care about privacy 2. 120hz screen 3. Better cameras 4. Better optimization for apps
@@Albino.Monkey no one likes curve displays Samsung is doing 120 hz from past year Samsung do care about privacy Samsung cameras are better in photography Android is on par with ios in terms of optimization. S21 display is better and it looks futuristic Iphone 13 camera bump is thicker than s21
@@bq68972 the S21 Ultra is on par and if not better than the iPhone 12 Pro Max. The upcoming S22 Ultra is the Phone you want to compare against the new iPhone 13 PM
@@bq68972 the S10 was for the iPhone 10, S20 was for the iPhone 11, S21 for the iPhone 12, now S22 for the iPhone 13. Samsung will blow iPhone away just like they did with S21 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max.
Samsung has really improved the optimization in exynos 2100 and its quicker in loading games and apps compared to iphone's a15 so just imagine how fast will be the samsung exynos 2200 with AMD GPU, thats not even supported by the geekbench 5 because its that's good.
@@MrBlackout97 Its a new phone and its iphone they don't give regular updates they just give the big ones and not for optimization they are already optimized for apps.
@@Ario_ALL the iPhone 13 Pro’s GPU is over 50% faster than the 12 pro’s GPU. It’s gonna be a rough battle to even match the GPU, let alone CPU performance, apparently memory and ram are even behind now in real world use on android flagships. No excuse for 16gb of ram not matching the performance of 6gb.
@@vambat3523 they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera. the notch looks like shit. took them a year after samsung to even get 120 hz refresh rate and samsung has 8k display, iphone barely has 4k
The Iphone's bazzel is still thick, the s21 ultra is just cleaner (and better in my opinion), as myself I own a s20 ultra with the Exynos chip and it is also a beast of a phone!
Speaking of ram management this is a perfect example why spec wars don’t mean anything. iOS is just written better and doesn’t need 12 plus gigs of ram. If you knocked both phones down to 4 gigs of ram I bet the S21 would be useless while the iPhone would still work
Probably the optimisation we should do that again in 1-2 months bc in some games the IPhone 12 is faster which would be weird if it stays like that right
@@mind_money_morphology not to mention.. samsung comes factory with limited gpu use .. you can turn up the speeds but it drains battery quicker than with it off
Honestly application loading has more to do with speed of memory rather than cpu speed. This shows Samsungs memory speeds are slightly faster but a cpu intensive application and the iPhone blows the s21 away
@@baldwinivofjerusalem47 no salt bud. I prefer android buddy but I use both. Usually iOS for work. Android for personal. Stats are stats. Rendering is cpu intensive and it was very obvious the iPhone was ahead. Im honestly over this iOS is better than android and vice versa. It’s literally the dumbest thing to argue over.
@@mikey187lfc Compared to iPhones they cant match the ram management, unless it's Google, both Apple and Google control their software from head to toe, the same cant be said about other Android OEMS
@@Racko. I think what your talking about is the aggressive nature in which OEM's kill apps and yes they do this to save battery. However, the difference between Android and iOS is, Android is a mini desktop environment and therefore needs more ram. I still run all the apps in this video without reloading on an S20 Ultra and without playing around with developers options. Maybe when videos like this are made, the devices should be factory reset first.
Have the apps being used in this test been optimised for the new A15 chipset yet? As this may make a difference with the outcome. Plus is it possible to do more heavy duty tasks such as export and importing 4K vids and images as that really tests the processor to its maximum potential, as the speed tests done currently don’t really show that.
@@androidoneiu5206 yeah, ik that. But we'll know that optimizations for iphone is quite easier once they're basically all the same, but android is different bc there're so much kind of apps for many different companies
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
I get that you have to test everything, but I always thought the "rendering test" was pointless. Yes it does show the power gap, but I literally know No-One that uses it. 🤷🏾♂️ But I get it. 😂
Completely agree!! That shit is stupid, I got an iPhone but like u, I don’t know anyone who renders anything on their phones. Give me real world usage all that Benchmark bullshit don’t mean anything to me
@@grimreaper318 Totally on point with you. I use the S21 Ultra, have been since launch, and it's flawless. I can imagine the same with any iPhone user with a new model. Honestly I find this "phone war" completely bullshit. Whichever phone you end up getting is subjective to your own likes and dislikes. I have been with android since the Samsung SII so of course I'll be in the android ecosystem indefinitely.
On my s21 ultra even though i put some of my apps in "keep open" they still reload when I open them at some times of the day. Samsung should step up their ram management system.
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@SpookySlash nobody is talking about competing with ios as Apple has been doing good with thier optimization but having their own OS would improve performance better than what they have currently on android
Asphalt 9 is not faster on the Galaxy S21 Ultra, Because you opened the game on the iPhone 13 Pro Max for the first time and it had to render to open the Game center, you do this mistake every time you make a comparison. Also the iPhone apps has more featured settings to load than the Android apps as you said yourself.
Well do the same test after a month or so again and you will have a different result. The same happend with last year iPhone 12 were the iphone 11 was almost in every app faster. Today the 12 smokes the 11
6:37 somehow i think samsung has black crush. i am s21u user. Concerning the display and camera color reproduction, i still prefer apple. Samsung gives us some display tweaks, though it does not help much. Default mode is too cartoon, neon light. Native mode is quite pale, flat in comparison with Apple's. Still most of the time, i use native mode.
The s21 Ultra 5G actually has a sim card specific for 5g compatibility, or failing that, a 5G Esim. Then there's the developer options which can speed up performance and screen animation and transition ect. Bench Marks don't really alter much with new devices.
@@tcc5750 They can't due to EU regulations, they were already forced off lightning on iPads, and they have to change to USBC next year. And almost all everything uses USBC these days if I got an iPhone i can't even charge it with my iPad charger lol
The funny thing is, saying theres a big difference is correct. The s21 ultra is almost 9 months old at this point... that is a HUGE amount of time for technological development. So ofcourse the s21 feels a gen behind... because IT is. New samsung comed out in january and smokes the 13... easy
You should’ve reset the S21 to factory settings. RAM was obviously used already since apps were already opened there. Some apps run faster though since they’ve been opened before
This is totally true. No one can take conclusions about which phone is faster when testing opening an app that was already opened before on Samsung, and is opening for the first time in iPhone. When an app is opened for the first time, it might have more processes going on, which takes more time to load.
If the upcoming Exynos 2200 with RDNA2 was competing with Apple A15, I’m assuming it’s only gonna lose by just 300 points in single thread, and 500 points in multi score average. Which means, Snapdragon 898 could be in trouble based on other leaks too
Nah you are talking about waay to big of an improvement which is not possible if there isn't a major architectural improvement which there isn't. So at best 1300 single and 4000 multi. That's the best possible scenario.
@@davout5775 Keep in mind it’s using RDNA2 architect, and since it’s early benchmarks. After the phone has proper software with android 12. It could be a little higher as expected
@@dad-n-gio2054 Yes i believe it ... Cause iphone 13 Pro max even Beats S21 Ultra in Battery Mrwhosetueboss makes a video about it LINK ruclips.net/video/IQQCoJiZj8w/видео.html
For rendering video comparison, you are wrong my friend. Samsung hardware is capable but android os and app optimization are better on iOS, that's why we are seeing this difference. 10:44 And very few people use mobile to export video. And even if they do, they can't zip it on iPhone and send it via cloud app( google drive, one drive) to someone. So, yes... you can enjoy this apple speed of rendering here, but it will be useless if you don't have a computer with you.
At this point, speeds are so fast on all flagships that it doesn't really matter anymore!
+1
True
Of course man! These "speed tests" are for all kind of "sheeps". And as you saw here even with such differences on benchmark the real time performance is the same.
Of course matters..
Samsung in performance always sucks...lower performance or throttling or Higher power consumption ....
In. Terms of optimization iphone is unbelievable ...
@@rajeshbarai2350 Samsung performed isn't that low tbh is good
I mean yeah iPhone and Samsung are really fast but does 1 second really matters in a true daily scenario?
No
For now?
NO
For Future Proofing?
YES
@@Jt-hn6lp no for never
@@stx7389 it does,
@@stx7389
I DISAGREE LOL
I feel these short burst speed tests are not anymore relevant for flagship phones given how much good the SOCs have become, you should compare the sustain performance under heavy load for these flagships
The a15 is like 3 years ahead.
No one in real world use, cares it their phone boots a half second later than someone else's. We don't live in a microsecond world.
@@dj-rocketman8545 if three years ahead why whenever i play game they always dimm the screen to 20% brightnes and start to overheat like 46,47 degree and kill the battery after 1 year?
Whenever i use my snapdragon 865,they always maintain at 42 degree and the performance is nearly indentical?
@@pham3383 have my iPhone 12 Pro battery is perfect and no over heating…
Performance is 3years ahead…
@@dj-rocketman8545 performance 3 years ahead while throttle in heavy games and dimm the screen to nearly unusable but still get hotter than snapdragons,great chipset
Samsung always releases phones in January, isheeps can talk till then and snapdragons will keep wrecking you in games
Ram management has definitely taken a hit on s21. Earlier they were able to keep all apps in ram
It's because Samsung started to close apps that use a certain about of resources at a time to save battery you can disable it/change it in settings for how long apps can be open. But the iPhone to the cake this time.
it's manageable via settings. you can easily allow all apps to remain resident in memory or opt in / out some of them and so on.
@@alexandrupantea6576 how?
@@maxo692 sttings, memory, apps, add apps to excluded apps. this way memory usage will never be checked on them and they will always stay resident.
@@maxo692 there is also the option to Keep open for quick launching via app / recent menu.
App opening speeds stopped being an issue for me after iPhone 5S and up when it was new. Now, the benchmark should be how fast these phones are after years og use and wear and tear, measureing how they would hold up. There is simply no reason to test which phone opens up an app faster when they're new. I simply cannot see the benefit of on e or the other laucnhing RUclips 150ms faster.
Now this also leads to which phone manufacturer keeps updating older phones the most. iPhone 6 and 6S is still having IOS updates, where Samsung usually leaves major updates out after 2-3 years. Longyevity would go to iPhone.
As an example, in 2019 I got the Galaxy S10 +, as of today it isn't really "Slow" but I have started to see hiccups/stutters here and there that was non-existent when it was new. My wifes iPhone 8 is still going smooth and just as fast, only downside being the battery. And it has IOS 15!
I simply cannot justify buying any Samsung device for that matter alone. Day one speed means nothing, longyevity does.
Yeah. I'm planning to switch from Samsung to Apple. Samsung's phones are just as, if not more expensive (due to higher depreciation of value) than iPhones. My phone still has bugs (GPS issue for months that went unfixed) but obviously Samsung doesn't care enough about their old customers
agreed, i had an s8 from launch and the way it stutters is nasty, had to install a custom rom, overclock the damn thing and still would lag compared to an iphone 7 plus which gets slightly hotter but doesnt lag even after half a decade
I also have a Samsung (S7 to be exact) and I also used to be an Apple hater. But the more I think about it and after many consideration, I wanna buy an iPhone lol. It last so long, I love the longevity of iPhone. And I still can't believe how the iPhone 6 still support an update (IOS 15), Despite almost 7 years? Great.
@@malvinolimit yeah, and seeing how phones now are much faster theyll probably last a good 10 years
An Android phone is like a Windows PC, if you clean all the junk and keep the software clean, it runs the same speed as day one, the only difference is, newer phones become faster.
From the S10 it's 3 years of updates and 5 years of security patches. If someone was really that bothered about keeping an old device, they could flash a custom rom with the latest Android version, you could even port the OS over yourself. There isn't one person o know though that keeps ap phone longer than 2 or 3 years, accept my Great Grandma.
The iphone 13 could easily last you a decade. I have an iphone 6 that was released seven years ago in 2014 and its still perfectly fine apart from its battery. In the iphone 13 nothing would get drastically worse over the years. Its battery life will still be fine, it's camera will still be great and it's processor will never struggle. It's absolutely worth it for me. 😄
yup u right broo...but3....im more impressive...im using 5s TILL NOW...imagine how long 13 pm will last...maybe 7 years
My dad bought nokia 1100 in 2006 and he used it for almost 8 years LoL 🤣🤣🤣
Lol samsung s5/s6/s7 are also working fine
Same with galaxy note 4 with custom rom
Apple gives software upgrade for iphone 6 upto ios14 which is 5 generations. Similar to what google promised
Amazed at the ram management of iPhone and the the bionic chip is crazy
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@Se7enGates lmao theres so much wrong with this comment it's funny. He wasn't disregarding the speeds of the s21 ultra, he was just praising the speeds of the pro max, so theres no need to fan droid over a man which is over a fking phone.
The cameras are better? This opinion is entirely subjective, but arrogantly shitting on apples cameras is just irrelevant. And the pro max can actually charge at 27watts, while the s21 ultra charges at 25. Additionally, the pro max has a substantially smaller battery than the s21's 5000 milliamp hours which results the pro max to charge faster
@@Se7enGates the s22 isnt out we can compare when it comes
@@asianserenadr7776 smaller battery but lasts longer however. Less w when charging means the battery doesn’t break as easily
@@nigeI even the iPhone 10 beats the last Samsung min performance lol
I'm super excited for the Google Pixel pro 6 to have this test against it. I'm really hoping with this new chip that they've created, that it will hold its own against both of these phones. It really doesn't bother me if one wins and the other one loses back and forth on different experiences, if it averages out. Because then, I feel like all three fans are at least getting pretty great phones.
Google silicon was designed with Samsung's help. Their leaked SoC configuration is very weird but I'm sure they have reasons for that. I suspect that the performance will be better than Snapdragon 888 but in these kinds of tests it won't make a difference. Brute forcing "app opening" and "loading times" with hardware doesn't cut it anymore, developers now need to optimize their apps to use the power from these chips properly. I'm sure native Google apps will be buttery smooth though, their older Pixel had ridiculous speed considering the chips were mostly mid-tier but third party apps...it won't be really different from what you see in the video. These chips are getting too crazy for what they are needed. They should be slapping these in laptops #MoreM1sInTheWorld
@@maximusasauluk7359 yeah I'm not as scared as some are about the new chip configuration. I'm actually kind of excited to see what they're doing with that chip since it has two of the higher end and then showing that it's got a lower end chips also. I'm wondering if it's because it actually will make it more beneficial, in a wild way. Or if it will actually be a way of getting the price down. There's a lot of different opportunities about it, just everyone is wondering why they went a little lower on those middle cores. I'm curious how they're even going to market it! If they're going to justify their reasoning or if they're just going to gloss over it and not even worry about talking what others are thinking? And then there is the third option that I'm kind of hoping for, and that there is more than one SOC. And the SOC we saw is for the regular six and they'll be another configuration for the six pro. Doubtful. You are very correct though on the developer's side of things and I'm always trying to tell friends that in clans on games why they don't get an update before others, etc.
They are using 3rd generation old Arm cortex-A76 for maximum performance which is weird. I don't think pixel 6 series is gonna be fast as latest iPhones or s21,S22.
@@faisalrahman9236 Maybe with Googles optimization, might have some tricks up their sleeves.
Cc
Most chips perform very well in short bursts but how is their sustained performance under load? That is the most important question for gaming and computation because one will usually start to see thermal throttling after around 5 to 10 minutes which devastates the performance - up to half of the peak performance as is the case with the furnace that is the Exynos 990. In future I'd like to see tests for sustained performance. 3D mark has a nice 20 minute test which shows the performance drop over time as temps increase.
Yea I'm wondering if apple is still forcing dimming after playing any heavy games for like 20-30mins, almost all phones in the last 5 years perform pretty much the same in short bursts
I'm playin' any games on my SD888' S21 Ultra. For an hour or so. All is amazing, phone just worm. Best phone ever.
@@sovietunioncitizen3365 warm. Why would you call your phone a worm
@@theknifeconnection9571 😂
I play tons of heavy games (codm) and the s21 runs extremely smooth and is capable of playing on the highest graphics
I’m so glad Samsung smoothed out the animations for games and other large apps. There’s nothing I hated more than seeing apps just pop open like it’s 2013. It always made the Samsung phones seem less capable compared to iPhones.
This is the massive improvement from exynos 990 to 2100.. i gotta say well done to Samsung
Just imagine how good the 2200 will be
Why does no one acknowledge apples improvements? They make huge upgrades every year in terms of speed, but you only praise samsung for giving a 5% improvement? This just shows how biased you are.
even I am using S21 Ultra exynos variant. but i found that my geekbench scores are single core:466 and multi core:1755 rather than yours exynos variant (sungle core:1084 and muLti core:3492)...can I do anything about it..I am from India
@@babyyoda9943 tbh honest apple doesnt deserve praise for obs faking such Benchmark scores.... being so far ahead with benchmarks but noticing nothing in real life... why would u praise apple for such BS scores...
Good bro u should have said this after s22 launch😑
S21 ultra is just a beast of a device... The s22 ultra looks promising
Yeah not really, apples 6GB of ram destroyed Samsungs 12GB of ram
@Noah P same here I have 12 pro max and I’m also using s10+ and the camera quality looks like it’s from 1995 not joking 🙃
I’d rather miss a few gimmicks than have horrible ram, worse chip, worse video quality, and low light quality
Not to mention the iPhone 12 and so on have much better durability, water resistance, and speed then all androids out right now
Okay this is just a fanboy comment, i have an s21 ultra and z fold 3.....and it's obvious that iphone 13 destroyed samsung unfortunately, but i am excited for the s22 ultra, hopefully the performance will be better than iphone 13
@@Unknownuserhtps lol ur comparing an s10 + to a 12 pro max , thats not a fair comparison btw I also have that phone
@@Unknownuserhtps nah, the S21 ultra kills the iPhone 7 in everything😂
The raw performance of the A15 is absolutely insane, but for most people, it really will not make that huge of a difference. But, a considerably more powerful chip is always welcome and will be great for keeping a phone running smooth for a lot of years.
But it can’t even do a split screen multitask like the S21 can. Also no always on display. What a waste of power.
@@Gemini530 Samsung Knight woot w00t.
Honestly the chips is way more than fast enough for tasks heck my iPhone 12 mini can do all I want it to do with no limits it’s very fast but the only thing I would care about seeing is a 2gb ram increase in all iPhone models!
@@Gemini530 Android can do that not s21. While ios doesnt have that feature so stfu kido
I agree
RAM management seems to have been downgraded on the S21 over time.... Bit disappointing
that was just pure humiliation, it has 12GB ram and still losses cmooon
@@mishomaisuradze8205 Didn't I just say that?🤨
@@gjna5143 yeah but i wanted to say it in a different way :D
that's the case with all trashroid phones
That’s why i use iPhone , cause all trashroid phones performance age like milk
At this point any phone you bought since 2020 is blazing fast already. Speed shouldn’t be the main reason to upgrade anymore
Samsung and amd will change the mobile market
@@danielayers8787 well, we will see.
@@axsh970 lol 😂
@@axsh970 it’s obvious already but I don’t know how they will do it
True👍🏼
I'm not really suprised. But can't wait the S22 ULTRA!!
Yes
The last day of ipone
@@samarart750 😶
@@rsivamani1942 u
@@samarart750 bro chill
In the future if u ever do speed tests in this formate, atleast open the app once before hand and set up the app, that changes speeds dramatically
I did that before testing. :)
@@XEETECHCARE liar 🤥 if you had done it before so asphalt wasn’t supposed to give you control instructions.
@@neutralbanda3215 he definitely won’t respond he just exposed!
@@neutralbanda3215 Someone is sore that the iPhone, despite having a supposedly significantly faster chip, cannot even open games like this in the same time. iPhone fans need to face the fact that benchmarks mean little.
@@XEETECHCARE if you did set up.. then why did The game showed you Instruction LIAR
Android's RAM management is shameful compared to iOS..
I'm a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra user
I’m an iPhone XS Max user, I will buy a 13 pro Max soon. I like both Apple and Samsung because both of them only compete each other. Samsung is the king of android being able to compete with apple. I gotta say Samsung and apple are the only ones sharing stuff like sharing the same screen. We apple users use screens made by Samsung whereas Samsung uses battery made by apple etc. It’s truly beautiful how they help each other out with stuff while users are fighting about who’s better. Idk who’s better, I think when it comes to being better it’s more about which software you prefer? iOS or Android? If you can answer that question, you know which device to buy🤷🏻♂️
So….opening Apps and doing normal day-to-day tasks all modern smartphones are plenty fast enough.
Doing anything intensive (real work) the iPhone pulls way ahead. That render test is a perfect example.
Going to get groceries a Toyota Camry is just as good as a Ferrari. Go to the track and it’s a different story.
How many times do you go on the track?
What are you talking about
@@ighayinosayi exactly my thought :). no point getting a Ferrari if you're going to the tracks once per 3 years or so. :D
intensive samsung performs better
The Iphone is like Driving a ferrari in city traffic while the engine is overheating from the lack of airflow.
S21U screen and colours just looks so much better 😍 😍
Because the brightness isn’t tha same on both phones
@@albanos.13 1440p and super amoled display,. Bro, the Galaxy has always had better screen, the iPhone screen look like my 100 dollar phone on eye protection mode😶
@@samuraisings5105 it has a more contrast screen but compared them myself side by side even with an iPhone 11 pro it hasn’t that much of a difference so I can easily tell the brightness isn’t the same on this video
@@albanos.13 not to mention blasting the contrast is an easy way to trick a consumer into thinking it's a better display, which is why TVs do it in stores and Samsung does it to their photos and screens. I'm not sure if the S21 does it to their screens by default but in Linus's review of the new Fold, he was disgusted by the colors of the screen only to find out later it was set by default to be overly high contrast in the settings so he had to change it.
@@Krolitian1 and I have noticed most people keep their Samsung phone display in dynamic wich is much more contrast than normal wich I don’t prefer at all
Two great phones. Lets look at it this way. Android has come so far over the last couple of years. It’s literally up there with iOS. A few years ago android was buggy sloppy slow and stuttery. Now look at it. ! That in itself is enough for me.
Even a few years ago it wasn't that bad it was decent
Android isn't up there with iOS. It shits on iOS. I have an iphone work phone and an adroid s21 personal phone. no comparison
You said it right not only is Android good it's packing more features than million year old iOS.
iOS still better
@@PAWNB3YOND yep i used both and i still find ios hella boring and sometimes frustrating
android has become a lot better and smoother especially on samsung with the 3 years of os updates
still if u like ios then good for ya
For an exynos version that's pretty impressive
ruclips.net/video/t1zMhu_8XSk/видео.html.
Exynos model has better CPU performance than SD 888
@@gsc-lol-islem6494 eh. That’s a little subjective
@@gsc-lol-islem6494 nope
@@theknifeconnection9571 nope the weak point of the exynos is the gpu not the cpu
5:14 the snow on the Ultra looks like actual white but on the iphone it is yellowish
It’s probably because of True Tone, adjusts the color temperature of the screen to the surroundings
That’s True Tone. You can just turn off True Tone.
Even though both screens have 120Hz it does seem to me that S21U looks smoother, the iPhone has these transition animations that look like what we call 'ghosting-effect' that happens in screens with lower refresh rates
Yeah yeah.. never admit it even if the screen is broken still say it looked better
No…. It’s the same screen. Made by Samsung, stop being a fanboy
ah android fanboy 😂
Stfu Samsung fanboy
androids are trash ☹️
The Saumsung screen looks really immersive!
What I'm liking is the richer contrast on the s21u ultra... Was the iPhone brightness higher than the s21u making it look more washed out?
Ikr?
Bro it's a phone not a 4K UHD TV that you watch movies on...
@@lmao7197 idk if you've heard about this thing called netflix and youtube but i watch series, videos and films on it. But go off...
@@lmao7197 it doesn't have to be, bro. We're watching a video on the performance differences of the iPhone vs the s21. The display quality is one of the differences I saw. It may not be 4k but 2k video watching on my s21 ultra is pretty amazing.
@@vmm132 Well thats what a tablet is for. I don't really consider the saturation/contrast of a phone screen, as long as it isn't abysmal. I'm just glad that they added 120hz to the 13 finally.
S21 ultra may be fast but I would rather get the folding as it doesn't stand as it does like in the old days
Use iphone and there's nothing to complain
@@abdullahmirza897 LMAO
@@abdullahmirza897 nothing to complain? 💀💀💀 iSheep
@@Aman-786 buy the iPhone and jailbreak. You would be able to do stuff you wouldn't be able to even with a rooted Samsung not to mention how Samsung intentionally fucks your phone forever after you root.
@@Aman-786 What do you complain about then brother? Genuine question.
Love your videos man. Keep it up.
Apple is a 9 months ahead on their phones though, it’ll be more fair once s22 comes out imo. Still a nice test for people considering these phones tho!
Edit: I meant 9 months ahead on their release cycle, not features.
@Asal Nidal There have been leaks that show the AMD x Exynos collab being up to 3x more performant in games compared to the A14. Either way we'll have to see, but even if the exynos does win imo things like refresh rate/touch smapling rate mater wayyyy more than a few extra fps, which is why people don't tend to use iPhones as a gaming phone.
@@SprintKeyz iphones are used as gaming phones by many pubg and free fire youtubers because of how fast it is
@@indulekhasantosh9743 Every game will be the same on the S21U and the iPhone 13, the power of these phones well exceeds what mobile games demand.
@@indulekhasantosh9743 Sure, but any android phone can still deliver 120+ fps in games, and at that point, touch sampling rate and refresh rate are more important. Plus, the notch can be annoying and distracting.
@Asal Nidal Yk what’s funny tho, you’re never gonna see the A bionic chips used to their full “raw performance”😂
Great speed test as always. You should not be surprised that the Geekbench scores are not representative of the actual performance, except in certain tasks that are not really necessary on a phone like video editing, every year the Samsungs hold there own. Considering the S21 is 8 months old and the Snapdragon may well be faster still. What was very clear from your video is that the gaming and video experience is far better without a notch.
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@ lmao, you have to be joking
@ yeah u right. I've only owned an iphone 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12. You're the one who's delusional
Just wait for the s22 coming out in 3 months :) it'll be the perfect phone
Also should be much quicker in real use.
Android 12 is 22% less cpu hogging
New Linux kernel (acc a big deal bc its now mostly the mainline 5.10 kernel so it should run extra great)
Arm v9 is 20% more efficient and faster
The sd 898 will have brand new arm cores and be 4nm (5nm pushed to the max where they fixed all issues like heating and further pushed battery efficiency and power along with updating all other aspects of the chip like the isp ,gpu ,ai etc)
Faster ram & storage.
It'll also have a more energy efficient display Samsung e5
Android 12 -15 updates
All the gimmicks will actually be pretty usable as the hardware can finally match the visions. No more lag or shit camera quality for all those dozens of modes and features.
The display has also been nailed in the sense of screen to body ratio whilst still having enough to hold on to.
@@Vhsss_God but will it be faster?
So samsung launched s22 same year as samsung s21
@@user-ud6xs8ly6e raw processing power no but actual use 100% . the only area the iPhone can even win is things like rendering times for video editing etc,that said that is like 5% of use cases so the s22 will feel more powerful even tho its just quicker. Like an electric car vs a muscle car.
@@cassidywilliams7187 no but it's almost October so it would be misleading to say 4months in a way, the s22 will be unveiled in January between the 7th & 14th roughly
Can't wait for the S22 Ultra note or whatever they're going to call it to see it up against the iphone 13. Next year's Samsung S series is going to be epic... The note and S line is going to merge💯💯💯💯💯😶😶
Watcha Samsung do some stupid decision like they always do any far behind on the chip speed
Hybrid Phone
Nah I am not a fan of they decision...... rather having a hybrid phone Samsung can just get rid of the S22 ultra and make the S22 plus as the new S22 ultra..... after that they can release an actually Note 22 ultra with the perfect boxy design and in built spen
If l even if they are going with the decision then just put the body design just like the note 20 ultra and put in built spen and just call it as Note 22 ultra and not some S22 Note ultra or Note 22S then I will be happy..... But tbh that decision is kinda not good enough
I am buying the s22 ultra, passed my exam
Switching to Iphone 13 pro max after 6yrs of android , I feel like iOS has finally catched up when it comes to features along with its own perks, forget the back button will be tough tho!
Nervous and excited at the same time.
Will also get the 🍎watch and see how it goes.
Also getting my first iPhone after using androids... So excited and also kinda nervous but it feels like the right thing to do!
Wouldn't the loading times be based on storage speed as apposed to CPU and GPU perfomance?
Yes. These tests are completely subjective. And he is using the Exynos version which is inferior to Samsungs Qualcomm chip. I use the S21U and I never lag (SD888). But you are right.
The iphone should destroy S21 ultra, because it has faster NVME storage. I'm not sure what is wrong with the iphone.
@@Phoenix56801 Probably iOS 15 needs some optimization updates. It'll probably improve over the next few months. Like how iOS 14.1 improved iOS 14 massively.
@Muhammad Ehtasam Sequential speed is nothing, random speed is what makes a phone feel snappy which is where NVME is superior.
@Muhammad Ehtasam 😂 source?
Bro Look the Display of S21 Ultra Such a Fantastic Colours. And Did Well in Speed test. I don't know How Gonna The S22 Ultra Will be
Agree with You S21Ultra Display look more clear & best color representation
Indeed. Unlike Apple, Samsung uses superior Super AMOLED screens. Which is more vibrant and has better color depth. The S22 is rumored to be mighty powerful. I look forward to it next year!
@@thenamestika Vibrant colors doesn’t make the display “better” the colors on the iPhone’s are so much realistic than the Samsung’s which makes the iPhone better for professionals
@@baranicer Vibrant colors make a huge difference. And no, iPhones don't have a more realistic look. PPI is higher on the Samsung phones, so naturally it has a better display. And professionals can use either phone lol, bland argument.
@@baranicer 5:16 the snow on the iphone looks like it was pissed on 🤣 whereas on the Ultra it's pure white, the colour snow is meant to be
Are we gonna ignore that the Exynos 2100 absolutely dominated most of the loading test despite being the weaker chipset here??? Let's go Samsung 😁😁😁
What let’s go samsung? It did nothing great
@Dont stalk my pfp the A chip is only a paper champ.
*Iphone loads app 0.4 milisecond faster*
"As you can see the iphone blazing fast"
Even the iPhone 12 Pro Max is significantly faster at loading Asphalt 9. Some software issue there with the 13 Pro.
Right
Because they always make up an excuse?
@@soundback5226 Logic 101. Not everything has to be built on hating or loving a company. It’s ok to put that away sometimes…
@@TCPUDPATM How pathetic that I am blind to fanaticism, I even synchronized the time it takes to load asphalt 9 on my grandmother's phone with a s10e and it is practically the same, open your eyes to the world because those who live on apple will always continue in a eternal dream
@@soundback5226 Phone came out like 2 weeks ago. No shit there’s not going to be much optimization for it
Crazy how well the S21 Ultra did against the latest and greatest IPhone. Would love to see a comparison with the snapdragon model as well. Seems synthetic benchmarks are far from the complete story of these devices
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@Se7enGates technically the galaxy s21 is samsung's 2021 phone option being released in January this year. The s22 isn't coming out until next year so the s21 ultra is the logical, best, and only option to compare with the best iPhone at the moment
My god the S21 ultra just looks so next gen 😍
It looks like every other samsung out there💀🤣
@@esyncc jeaulas from samsung
everybody gangsta till S21 Ultra gets a screen burn like every other Samsung predocessor
@@pakbeauty6929 how am i jealous every samsung looks exactly the same🤣🤣💀💀
@@YungCarl10 even I'm using 200$ phone...with amoled panel no burning issues
Switched from iPhone 6+ to Samsung S line ups and never backed to Apple again.
Good for you. No one cares.
@@sairian Thanks btw who cares
@@KHISA_06 No problem.
Great to see Samsung holding its own. The cell phone 🌎 is so competitive it just comes down to preference
Never really liked S series but this one is amazing
I've always been a Samsung fan but honestly in my opinion even though Samsung's phones are good I don't like them anymore for a few reasons (Specifically the s21 ultra)
1. They removed the headphone jack
2. They removed the micro sd slot
3. Camera bump is too big
4. The curved display is barely even curved anymore
And yes I understand that the iphonr 13 doesn't have a headphone jack and micro sd slot but at this point in my opinion they are similar enough that its just a matter of preference and I prefer the iphone 13 for a few reasons...
1. They care about privacy
2. 120hz screen
3. Better cameras
4. Better optimization for apps
@@Albino.Monkey no one likes curve displays
Samsung is doing 120 hz from past year
Samsung do care about privacy
Samsung cameras are better in photography
Android is on par with ios in terms of optimization.
S21 display is better and it looks futuristic
Iphone 13 camera bump is thicker than s21
@@AHMNZ I honestly cant tell if you are trying to get me to buy the s21 or you are trying to say samsung is better in every way imaginable
@@Albino.Monkey I don't see you trying to say the same thing about iPhone
@@fingerinmynose4826 Well obviously you didn't read the part were it says "in my opinion"
They are both performing good, I don't see a real deference between both phones.
iphone every year getting faster and widen the gap on android. But no interesting features eg
icons and themes stuck boring.
@@bq68972 as if android not getting faster????????? lol im not even a sheep but, this statement kinda blew my mind
@@Luxcferthen let it blow
@@bq68972 the S21 Ultra is on par and if not better than the iPhone 12 Pro Max. The upcoming S22 Ultra is the Phone you want to compare against the new iPhone 13 PM
@@bq68972 the S10 was for the iPhone 10, S20 was for the iPhone 11, S21 for the iPhone 12, now S22 for the iPhone 13. Samsung will blow iPhone away just like they did with S21 Ultra vs iPhone 12 Pro Max.
Samsung has really improved the optimization in exynos 2100 and its quicker in loading games and apps compared to iphone's a15 so just imagine how fast will be the samsung exynos 2200 with AMD GPU, thats not even supported by the geekbench 5 because its that's good.
Bruh, even the A15 isn’t even optimized for for all these apps. Imagine the difference after a couple of months after some updates.
@@MrBlackout97 Its a new phone and its iphone they don't give regular updates they just give the big ones and not for optimization they are already optimized for apps.
The Exynos 2200 is said to perform 65% better than the Exynos 2100.
@@Ario_ALL the iPhone 13 Pro’s GPU is over 50% faster than the 12 pro’s GPU. It’s gonna be a rough battle to even match the GPU, let alone CPU performance, apparently memory and ram are even behind now in real world use on android flagships. No excuse for 16gb of ram not matching the performance of 6gb.
@@JoshPoseyTech Yes, the Exynos went up a lot, but the iPhone 13 performance also went up, so it's similar again.
Galaxy S21 Ultra king of smartphone.
CAP not true it lost in this comparison.
@@vambat3523 maybe because the S21 Ultra was made to compete against the iPhone 12 Pro Max. Wait until the S22 Ultra.
@@wiyseful8859 alright ill wait for the s22 ultra
@@vambat3523 they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera. the notch looks like shit. took them a year after samsung to even get 120 hz refresh rate and samsung has 8k display, iphone barely has 4k
Wow, exynos holding up well here.
Can’t wait for 🔋 test videos for these flagships!
iPhone won
Iphone won you can watch mrwhosetheboss battery test video
Speed is the most important aspect of a phone. Keeping the number one spot is no joke. Good job Apple.
The Iphone's bazzel is still thick, the s21 ultra is just cleaner (and better in my opinion), as myself I own a s20 ultra with the Exynos chip and it is also a beast of a phone!
have you ever tried the 13?
Quality looks much better in S21
Like usual
Samsung is trash
Quality? What Quality?
Display?
Because it has the best display on any smartphone right now
@@travisbloomfield303 like you 😋🤣
Speaking of ram management this is a perfect example why spec wars don’t mean anything. iOS is just written better and doesn’t need 12 plus gigs of ram. If you knocked both phones down to 4 gigs of ram I bet the S21 would be useless while the iPhone would still work
Probably the optimisation we should do that again in 1-2 months bc in some games the IPhone 12 is faster which would be weird if it stays like that right
I don’t care what anyone says, the notch has become iconic
Exactly my thought .. I do believe Apple is doing this on purpose so the iPhone gets an iconic and easily identifiable look ..
@@pabloevuu5232 totally makes sense. Needs to separate itself from the rest of the crowd
😄
Google and huawei used that notch on their phone before apple did. Just saying. (Smaller notch)
@@LetTheseWordsInspireYou yea, but who cares about Huawei and who has a Pixel? 😂
6:51 XEETECHCARE : And that is...
iPhone : Welcome to suplex city
S21ultr sreen look much better than iphone13pro max
Apple has True Tone to help your eyes! So they will look different.
iPhone has always been the king when it comes to RAM management
Not always
5:55 it feels like Kaby Lame shows S21U being faster 😂😂😂
Oh.. hahaha 😂😂. Just realized now.
Bro I don’t think this guy even knows what quicker looks like some times. iPhone won EVERY TIME😭😂
@@mind_money_morphology apples brand new flagship vs a year old samsung .. yes I would hope the iPhone would be faster lmao...
And its barley even faster on some apps lmao they go back and forth
@@mind_money_morphology not to mention.. samsung comes factory with limited gpu use .. you can turn up the speeds but it drains battery quicker than with it off
Isn’t a lot of load time ssd dependent or is the cpu the bottleneck nowadays
Honestly application loading has more to do with speed of memory rather than cpu speed. This shows Samsungs memory speeds are slightly faster but a cpu intensive application and the iPhone blows the s21 away
"BlOwS tHe S21 aWay"
Hmm smelling a lot of salt here.
@@baldwinivofjerusalem47 no salt bud. I prefer android buddy but I use both. Usually iOS for work. Android for personal. Stats are stats. Rendering is cpu intensive and it was very obvious the iPhone was ahead. Im honestly over this iOS is better than android and vice versa. It’s literally the dumbest thing to argue over.
android phones cant get rid of poor ram management, no matter how much bigger and faster rams they use
Really? I don't have any problems on my S20 Ultra or my Tab S 7 Plus, there's also videos on RUclips that show ram management out performing ios.
@@mikey187lfc Compared to iPhones they cant match the ram management, unless it's Google, both Apple and Google control their software from head to toe, the same cant be said about other Android OEMS
@@Racko. But Google is pure Android. Also I downloaded every app in this video and all apps remained in memory on my S20 ultra.
@@mikey187lfc Yea, thats what I said, Google is pure android and they control the software, S20U also runs Android but with a OneUI skin on top of it
@@Racko. I think what your talking about is the aggressive nature in which OEM's kill apps and yes they do this to save battery. However, the difference between Android and iOS is, Android is a mini desktop environment and therefore needs more ram.
I still run all the apps in this video without reloading on an S20 Ultra and without playing around with developers options. Maybe when videos like this are made, the devices should be factory reset first.
Have the apps being used in this test been optimised for the new A15 chipset yet? As this may make a difference with the outcome. Plus is it possible to do more heavy duty tasks such as export and importing 4K vids and images as that really tests the processor to its maximum potential, as the speed tests done currently don’t really show that.
S21 is better at all, but ios is way better when it comes to optimization
one UI has the same level of optimization than iOS but in applications differs
@@androidoneiu5206 yeah, ik that. But we'll know that optimizations for iphone is quite easier once they're basically all the same, but android is different bc there're so much kind of apps for many different companies
@@josehonorato2743 yes, but you can optimize for android very well
@@androidoneiu5206 last night I got a one IU 3.1 lasted updated for galaxy note 10. Bro it's stunning really a really nice update patch of August
@@josehonorato2743 yes
So happy with my S21 Plus. US Import with the 888. AnTuTu of over 710,000.
One fact you should know that both phone use the same factory display. Samsung display division really amazing. Love it.
samsung will forever be the best phone
For slow phone
Ok yes
Keep telling yourself that whatever makes you happy 😂 Clearly Apple destroyed Samsung on this video.
It was a joke I know apple is killing samsung 😆
I think Apple is Best because of thrir software optimization❤️🩹
Samsung is also amazing in software otpimization, you can see in the video.
@@casanova6283 apple wasnt able to release an update yet for the newer devices haha
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
I get that you have to test everything, but I always thought the "rendering test" was pointless. Yes it does show the power gap, but I literally know No-One that uses it. 🤷🏾♂️ But I get it. 😂
Completely agree!! That shit is stupid, I got an iPhone but like u, I don’t know anyone who renders anything on their phones. Give me real world usage all that Benchmark bullshit don’t mean anything to me
@@grimreaper318 Totally on point with you. I use the S21 Ultra, have been since launch, and it's flawless. I can imagine the same with any iPhone user with a new model. Honestly I find this "phone war" completely bullshit. Whichever phone you end up getting is subjective to your own likes and dislikes. I have been with android since the Samsung SII so of course I'll be in the android ecosystem indefinitely.
That's real worls usage he showed how the phone performed with game app like Instagram and also some system app
same as 100x zoom 😂
@@Matchleader What is the same? To my knowledge, only Samsung and Xiaomi have 100X zoom or higher. Apple doesn't exceed 10X on their lineup.
You weren't wearing glasses on Samsung Instagram camera but wearing on Apple Instagram camera
4:00 iPhone on Hotspot bro cooked test
The reason why iPhone wins in almost every app is because programmers focus more on improving the app for apple devices and then android.
It feels like the same thing for Intel and amd processors lol
@@imaginenation2065lol
iphone 13 just came out, when did programmers and developers work on and optimized iphone 13 apps 😂
sorry but iphone 13 just released and developers are yet to optimise their apps yet sir. both phones are fast enough to satisfy everyone 🥱
@@johnthekid999 Oh god🤦🏿♂️
Still waiting for the iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Galaxy S21 Ultra Nutella Freeze test! 🙏🏽
WHEN S22 ULTRA 😎🤟💯💥
When iphone 14 pro max
@@vambat3523 when s23 ultra
2:33 thats a big ass phone 👀
5:18 Samsun display ❤️
It's impressive that the iPhone keeps all of those games in memory with half the RAM while the S21 needs to reload every single one.
Its different
On my s21 ultra even though i put some of my apps in "keep open" they still reload when I open them at some times of the day. Samsung should step up their ram management system.
they literally comparing a year old samsung phone instead of the s22 ultra to the new iphone that hasn't even released yet. Ofcourse it's gonna be slightly faster. What's sad is that it's a year newer than the phone it's being compared to and only that much faster with still having slower charging and a worse camera
@@Se7enGates the S22 Ultra could'nt be compared to 13 Pro Max cause it will be released 5-6 months after the iPhone.. There isn't any difference.
S21 ultra is almost 1 year old
Bro, idk why but I can clearly see in your video that the iphone's screen is not so smooth as the s21 ultra when you re scrolling on tiktok etc....😄
Apple: let's compare our phones
Samsung: ok but why do you keep coming with this one phone to compare with my flagships every year
S21 ultra 🥰
Imagine samsung running its own operating system
Keyword: Imagine
Its not gonna happen, as their relation with almost every company is great😃
It will be FANTASTIC!
but i am 1 Billion % sure it will NEVER HAPPEN
😂 They can never compete with iOS.
@@SpookySlash nobody is talking about competing with ios as Apple has been doing good with thier optimization but having their own OS would improve performance better than what they have currently on android
So a few times you gave things to the iPhone when the Samsung was clearly faster. This felt VERY biased.
The thing that pops out is that the whites on the IPhone look more yellow. The Galaxy screen also looks more brighter.
But it is not it is actually less brighter than the iPhone. The iPhone had also true tone on
@@davout5775 numbers on paper don't mean anything. You know that. The white on the Galaxy looks way more natural. The iPhone has much softer tones.
Asphalt 9 is not faster on the Galaxy S21 Ultra, Because you opened the game on the iPhone 13 Pro Max for the first time and it had to render to open the Game center, you do this mistake every time you make a comparison. Also the iPhone apps has more featured settings to load than the Android apps as you said yourself.
It's literally a generation ahead🤷
Exynos 2100 n SD 888 are last year chips
S21 ULTRA IS BEAST
the 13 is more exciting
@@vambat3523 lol
.Observations:
What the Bench mark scores show does not coincide with the test, this has happened year after year
Conclusion:
Benchmark is 🦬💩💩💩
Well do the same test after a month or so again and you will have a different result. The same happend with last year iPhone 12 were the iphone 11 was almost in every app faster. Today the 12 smokes the 11
6:37 somehow i think samsung has black crush. i am s21u user. Concerning the display and camera color reproduction, i still prefer apple.
Samsung gives us some display tweaks, though it does not help much.
Default mode is too cartoon, neon light.
Native mode is quite pale, flat in comparison with Apple's. Still most of the time, i use native mode.
The s21 Ultra 5G actually has a sim card specific for 5g compatibility, or failing that, a 5G Esim. Then there's the developer options which can speed up performance and screen animation and transition ect. Bench Marks don't really alter much with new devices.
I think I got to subscribe to this channel because of the speed test...
Only and always samsung🥰😍🤩
iPhone 14 Pro with no notch, bezels and USB C would be the best thing ever
Apple will keep lightning port for royalties on iPhone. To be honest lightning isn't bad. Hell it means I don't have to replace my chargers. :D
@@tcc5750 They can't due to EU regulations, they were already forced off lightning on iPads, and they have to change to USBC next year. And almost all everything uses USBC these days if I got an iPhone i can't even charge it with my iPad charger lol
@@tcc5750 EU regulations disagree
The funny thing is, saying theres a big difference is correct. The s21 ultra is almost 9 months old at this point... that is a HUGE amount of time for technological development. So ofcourse the s21 feels a gen behind... because IT is. New samsung comed out in january and smokes the 13... easy
You should’ve reset the S21 to factory settings. RAM was obviously used already since apps were already opened there. Some apps run faster though since they’ve been opened before
This is totally true. No one can take conclusions about which phone is faster when testing opening an app that was already opened before on Samsung, and is opening for the first time in iPhone. When an app is opened for the first time, it might have more processes going on, which takes more time to load.
What's wrong with s21 ultra's ram management 🤔, it did better(past) ..
Better?
be specific, better than previous series or btter than iphone ?
@@osiris7945 better than the previous samsungs and other androids.
huh? even with half the amount of ram iphone completely annihilates the S21 ultra lmao
bro how did it do better, the 13 obviously won samsung fanboy
If the upcoming Exynos 2200 with RDNA2 was competing with Apple A15, I’m assuming it’s only gonna lose by just 300 points in single thread, and 500 points in multi score average. Which means, Snapdragon 898 could be in trouble based on other leaks too
Nah you are talking about waay to big of an improvement which is not possible if there isn't a major architectural improvement which there isn't. So at best 1300 single and 4000 multi. That's the best possible scenario.
You mean A14🤣 no wait A13
@@davout5775 Keep in mind it’s using RDNA2 architect, and since it’s early benchmarks. After the phone has proper software with android 12. It could be a little higher as expected
@@SerPapus Sure, bud…
@@JoseGarcia-mi4ig Doesn't really matter the A15 will also get better with optimization
The upgrades in new iPhones is equivalent to One Plus changing it's Logo few years prior..
Lmao 🤣
Eh? 120hz, 20% better battery life, 3 brand new cameras, it’s a significant upgrade this year imo
@@Yxorm_com no its not.... You really believe 20 % battery... lol.... The Cameras are still the same from last year...
@@dad-n-gio2054
Yes i believe it ... Cause iphone 13 Pro max even Beats S21 Ultra in Battery
Mrwhosetueboss makes a video about it
LINK ruclips.net/video/IQQCoJiZj8w/видео.html
@@dad-n-gio2054 no we have new sensors, cinematic mode, macro mode and a better night mode
When he opens tiktok on the Samsung if had a iPhone 13 ad
For rendering video comparison, you are wrong my friend. Samsung hardware is capable but android os and app optimization are better on iOS, that's why we are seeing this difference. 10:44
And very few people use mobile to export video. And even if they do, they can't zip it on iPhone and send it via cloud app( google drive, one drive) to someone.
So, yes... you can enjoy this apple speed of rendering here, but it will be useless if you don't have a computer with you.