Veer Savarkar, Gandhi or Hijab,-Dr. RUCHIKA SHARMA
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 мар 2024
- #utkarshgaur #ruchikasharma #savarkar
00:00 Preview
0:38 Views on national & Hindu culture
1:14 Commentary on mass conversions
1:44 Debunking Myths on conversions & secularism
2:17 Turbans & hijabs in schools
2:48 Clarification: Hijab's mandatory nature
3:24 Hijab vs. jilbab meanings
3:58 Rules in public schools on expression
4:37 Authorship of Arthashastra inquiry
5:08 Existence of Chanakya & legends' exaggeration
5:42 Chanakya & Kautilya in literature
6:20 Chanakya's existence in historical sources
6:52 Summary: Historical research findings
7:34 Discussion: Savarkar's controversial role
8:31 Savarkar's arrest & imprisonment
9:06 Prison time & desire for release
9:46 Savarkar's petitions & support for British
10:29 Savarkar's pledges against nationalism
11:01 Shift to Hindutva ideology
11:39 Bhagat Singh's Arrest & Approach
12:20 Bhagat Singh's stance on independence
12:55 Comparison: Savarkar vs. Bhagat Singh
13:34 Origin of "Veer" title for Savarkar
14:32 Lack of documentation on heroic acts
15:07 Promotion of Savarkar's title
15:42 Factual basis & acceptance of title
16:13 Public perception of Savarkar
16:44 Difference in history & science perception
17:19 Historical figures earning titles
17:54 Questioning the basis of Savarkar's title
18:37 Discussion: Leaders' apologies & context
19:14 Formal salutations in letters
19:45 Comparison with communist leaders
20:26 Gandhi's contributions contrasted with Savarkar
20:56 Bhagat Singh's support & comparison
21:27 Personal views on Gandhi
22:13 Gandhi's principles & relevance
22:55 Gandhi's major contributions
23:38 Discussion on Gandhi's impact & legacy
24:15 Historical Proof: Gandhi's contributions & controversies
24:50 Debate: Gandhi's actions on Bhagat Singh
25:38 Bhagat Singh's sacrifice vs. Gandhi's analysis
26:10 Reflections: Bhagat Singh's intentions & Gandhi's influence
26:51 Bhagat Singh's mission for Indian independence
27:25 Gandhi's stance on clemency & Impact
28:13 Sources on Savarkar & Gandhi's influence
28:51 Gandhi's role in independence decisions
29:26 Savarkar's affidavit & independence movement
30:04 Critique: Savarkar's actions & perspectives
30:38 Debate: Nationalism vs. Secularism
31:22 Secularism & India's cultural identity
32:02 Cultural diversity vs. nationalism
32:31 Perspectives: Hindu culture & Hindutva
32:59 Defining Hindutva & Savarkar's views
33:38 Savarkar's views on r#pe as a political tool
34:18 Mass conversions & implications
34:48 Demographic changes during British rule
35:35 Population dynamics & modern facilities
36:16 Alauddin Khilji's governance approach
37:31 Historical narratives & societal norms on women
38:36 Legal aspects in Manusmriti
39:20 Battles: Mughal vs. Manusmriti eras
40:03 manusmriti's influence in Indian courts
40:43 Recent judgments & Manusmriti debates
41:26 Danger involving Manusmriti & judiciary
42:12 Secularism Interpretation in India
42:38 Indian model of secularism & principles
43:12 Equality, independence & religious practices
43:48 Discussion: Equality & religious practices
45:14 Religious Freedoms & attire in Public Life
45:50 Wearing religious attire in institutions
46:25 Religious attire tests in a legal context
46:56 Limitations of religious freedoms
47:26 Courts' role in interpreting religious texts
48:32 Scholars' interpretations of religious practices
49:10 Hijab in Quran & interpretation
49:45 Differentiating hijab & jilbab
50:17 Principles opposing hijab
50:46 Stereotypes & views on hijab
51:53 School rules & personal choice
52:30 Mandatory attire & individual agency
52:59 Empowering women on hijab choice
53:35 Aryan migration theory vs. invasion
54:14 Archaeological evidence: Aryan invasion
55:00 Archaeological findings & timelines
55:40 Linguistic evidence & Aryan migration
57:55 Linguistic & historical evidence
58:43 Deity Soma's significance
59:23 Genetic evidence & Aryan migration
1:00:05 Pottery culture & civilization distinction
1:00:44 Genetic evidence & migration timelines
1:01:30 Genetic markers & regional variations
1:02:08 DNA analysis & migration patterns
1:04:18 Domestication beginnings & Mehrgarh
1:07:04 Last migration groups & social classes
1:07:37 Indigenous tribes & enslavement
1:07:37 Indigenous tribes & enslavement
1:08:15 Critique: "Last recorded human"
1:08:56 Ancient artifacts' significance
1:10:01 Migration & regional interactions
1:10:36 Discovery & importance of ancient tools
1:11:12 Purpose of human existence
1:14:43 Ongoing conflicts & atrocities
1:15:17 Global population distribution
1:16:07 Human population growth impacts
1:16:49 Poverty lines & population growth
1:17:22 Environmental degradation concerns
1:17:59 Reflections on human life & environment
1:19:48 Implications of inaccurate historical facts
Chapters in videos bio. RUclips not approving the time stamps on the screen .
I wish I get as much courage as you have my friend, currently am a keyboard warrior 🥲
andhbhakt
This low life scum lady, is completely skipping over the fact Gandhi like literally helped Britishers in their movement to crush Zulu in order to please his English master
Came here from pranav's story!
Bring Vijay prashad next
She glorifies aurangzeb
U beleive her?
@@drg598 idk bro I didn't watch her podcast
(0:00)-Preview
0:38 Views on national & Hindu culture
1:14 Commentary on mass conversions
1:44 Debunking Myths on conversions & secularism
2:17 Turbans & hijabs in schools
2:48 Clarification: Hijab's mandatory nature
3:24 Hijab vs. jilbab meanings
3:58 Rules in public schools on expression
4:37 Authorship of Arthashastra inquiry
5:08 Existence of Chanakya & legends' exaggeration
5:42 Chanakya & Kautilya in literature
6:20 Chanakya's existence in historical sources
6:52 Summary: Historical research findings
7:34 Discussion: Savarkar's controversial role
8:31 Savarkar's arrest & imprisonment
9:06 Prison time & desire for release
9:46 Savarkar's petitions & support for British
10:29 Savarkar's pledges against nationalism
11:01 Shift to Hindutva ideology
11:39 Bhagat Singh's Arrest & Approach
12:20 Bhagat Singh's stance on independence
12:55 Comparison: Savarkar vs. Bhagat Singh
13:34 Origin of "Veer" title for Savarkar
14:32 Lack of documentation on heroic acts
15:07 Promotion of Savarkar's title
15:42 Factual basis & acceptance of title
16:13 Public perception of Savarkar
16:44 Difference in history & science perception
17:19 Historical figures earning titles
17:54 Questioning the basis of Savarkar's title
18:37 Discussion: Leaders' apologies & context
19:14 Formal salutations in letters
19:45 Comparison with communist leaders
20:26 Gandhi's contributions contrasted with Savarkar
20:56 Bhagat Singh's support & comparison
21:27 Personal views on Gandhi
22:13 Gandhi's principles & relevance
22:55 Gandhi's major contributions
23:38 Discussion on Gandhi's impact & legacy
24:15 Historical Proof: Gandhi's contributions & controversies
24:50 Debate: Gandhi's actions on Bhagat Singh
25:38 Bhagat Singh's sacrifice vs. Gandhi's analysis
26:10 Reflections: Bhagat Singh's intentions & Gandhi's influence
26:51 Bhagat Singh's mission for Indian independence
27:25 Gandhi's stance on clemency & Impact
28:13 Sources on Savarkar & Gandhi's influence
28:51 Gandhi's role in independence decisions
29:26 Savarkar's affidavit & independence movement
30:04 Critique: Savarkar's actions & perspectives
30:38 Debate: Nationalism vs. Secularism
31:22 Secularism & India's cultural identity
32:02 Cultural diversity vs. nationalism
32:31 Perspectives: Hindu culture & Hindutva
32:59 Defining Hindutva & Savarkar's views
33:38 Savarkar's views on r#pe as a political tool
34:18 Mass conversions & implications
34:48 Demographic changes during British rule
35:35 Population dynamics & modern facilities
36:16 Alauddin Khilji's governance approach
37:31 Historical narratives & societal norms on women
38:36 Legal aspects in Manusmriti
39:20 Battles: Mughal vs. Manusmriti eras
40:03 manusmriti's influence in Indian courts
40:43 Recent judgments & Manusmriti debates
41:26 Danger involving Manusmriti & judiciary
42:12 Secularism Interpretation in India
42:38 Indian model of secularism & principles
43:12 Equality, independence & religious practices
43:48 Discussion: Equality & religious practices
45:14 Religious Freedoms & attire in Public Life
45:50 Wearing religious attire in institutions
46:25 Religious attire tests in a legal context
46:56 Limitations of religious freedoms
47:26 Courts' role in interpreting religious texts
48:32 Scholars' interpretations of religious practices
49:10 Hijab in Quran & interpretation
49:45 Differentiating hijab & jilbab
50:17 Principles opposing hijab
50:46 Stereotypes & views on hijab
51:53 School rules & personal choice
52:30 Mandatory attire & individual agency
52:59 Empowering women on hijab choice
53:35 Aryan migration theory vs. invasion
54:14 Archaeological evidence: Aryan invasion
55:00 Archaeological findings & timelines
55:40 Linguistic evidence & Aryan migration
57:55 Linguistic & historical evidence
58:43 Deity Soma's significance
59:23 Genetic evidence & Aryan migration
1:00:05 Pottery culture & civilization distinction
1:00:44 Genetic evidence & migration timelines
1:01:30 Genetic markers & regional variations
1:02:08 DNA analysis & migration patterns
1:04:18 Domestication beginnings & Mehrgarh
1:07:04 Last migration groups & social classes
1:07:37 Indigenous tribes & enslavement
1:07:37 Indigenous tribes & enslavement
1:08:15 Critique: "Last recorded human"
1:08:56 Ancient artifacts' significance
1:10:01 Migration & regional interactions
1:10:36 Discovery & importance of ancient tools
1:11:12 Purpose of human existence
1:14:43 Ongoing conflicts & atrocities
1:15:17 Global population distribution
1:16:07 Human population growth impacts
1:16:49 Poverty lines & population growth
1:17:22 Environmental degradation concerns
1:17:59 Reflections on human life & environment
1:19:48 Implications of inaccurate historical facts
Sachindra Sanyal wrote the same petition like Savarkar did and he was released. But did he stop his revolutionary activities? Never. He was jailed again and again. He escaped again and again through legal ways. Finally British put him in a cramped cell with a dying tuberculosis patient and he was infected as well.
Repeated petitions by him was rejected and when it was clear he won't survive the disease, he was released and he died.
Savarkar must be compared to this. Savarkar was not even relased because they knew how dangerous he was.
Those mercy petitions were the only way to escape the hell of Kalapani.
Now judging our selfless revolutionaries sitting is air conditioned room is just rude.
bilkul sahi kaha bhai Magar yah Baat To Bata Nahin Hai debate Mein Varna Savarkar bade ho Jaenge.
Bhai yeh hadd biased so called historian hai ,inse unbiased hone ki umeed mat krna na hi inse history seekhna
Jnu ki jihadan hai nahi samajh mai aayegi ise 😂😂😂😂😂Randi saali
Hijab Niqab etc etc.. All comes under Covering the whole body from Non Mehram means Other Men especially while going Outside… And It is mentioned as Compulsory in Quran…. No Women in Islam should go outside Open Hair with Makeup with Perfume short dress … If any girl denies this Its Her matter and It on her but Parents should teach their Daughters To stay in modesty
Let's do a live fact checking who is wrong will be leaving the platform .
@bcastudy Good Answer
@@utkarshgaur. And tell the believers from among the women to lower their gaze and protect their private parts and not to display their beauty except for what is apparent from her, and to draw their veils over their bosoms’ surah- al-Nur : 31
The word used to cover their head is khumur which is the plural form of khimar. Khimar refers to head covering which is commonly used by the Arabs. And here Allah tells the Prophet to instruct the women to draw their head coverings to also cover their bosoms.
However one must note that the instruction about modesty first is given to Muslim men. The men are first asked to lower their gaze. So it is imperative that men control themselves first. The next command goes to the women and about covering themselves. The instruction is given to the women, not men. So men has no business policing the dress of women. Men’s duty is to lower the gaze.
The hijab/khimar is part of the religion of Islam. But it doesn’t make one out of the religion just because she doesn’t wear one. And men are not suppose to harass ladies who are not wearing a hijab. Our duty is to lower our gaze and control ourselves.
@@utkarshgaur. and this is from Surah al Azab 33:59 O Prophet! Ask your wives, daughters, and believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies.
Cloak means a loose clothes without Sleeves which can be Wore as Outer garment… in today’s modern days It is normally compared to Burqa but it has Sleeves that’s it
Adam seeker se milo wo btayega 😅@@utkarshgaur.
If Rapes etc is permitted in battle field by Manusmriti
Then please share list of
Johar incidents done by women in War in Manusmriti period.
ughhh finally a podcast that is actually respectful, mindful and where host actually dosent do an interview but rather discusses with the guest with an open mind with citations and sources. thankyou for this and hope that many podcasters actually apply these rules and this level and amount of discipline and respect towards each other.
13:39 she calls herself historians 😂 she omitted so much about history and that's the issue with these frauds
1) Savarkar was send to 50 years of jail for torture not for vacation. 2)Britishers said in their investigation that he was biggest threat for them
3) shame on her for comparison of Bhagat Singh and Veer savarkar.
4) savarkar for Bhagat Singh was one of the biggest inspiration.
This is what Bhagat Singh wrote about savarkar 15 and 22 November 1924, Matwala, Vishwa Prem
[The one who loves this world is that braveheart, whom we don’t feel ashamed to call as a fierce insurgent and a fanatic anarchist - this is the Veer (brave) Savarkar,”]
5) Britishers deliberately didn't kill savarkar as they didn't want to make him martyr
6) Bhagat Singh translated veer savarkars book 2nd edition and it was like gita or bible for revolutionaries
6) Britishers admit that they make mistake by hanging Bhagat Singh
She his the problem why people hate these darbari historians.
Stop pulling facts out of ur ass🎉🎉
Lol, most of the above points are fake. Provide sources for 1,5,6 and 7.
@@45015Kagsshe won't because there is none 😂
Gandhi done a cost-benefit analysis?
then Savarkar too did a cost-benefit analysis.
Savarkar jailed for kala Pani for Book, not Merder
RSS wale ho kya
The kajal and nailpolish example are so illogical... The problem is kajal and nailpolish are not linked to a particular religion...but whereas hijab is linked to Islam, a religion...
Communists historians ka simple ka logic h... Indian history or sanatan culture sab bakwas h.. Uska koi evidence hi nhi h...
Mughal or jitne muslim rulers the... Bahut ache the... Bahut kuch acha kiya h unhone...
Mughal bahar se aaye, British bahar se aaye, Brahmans (Aryans) bahar se aaye, india ka asli culture h boddh culture. Ye sanatan wanatan kucch h nhi, sab dhong hai, history padhega to samaj aaega
Apke har bat se sehmat hu but sawal hai.....Akhnad bharat ko mante ho na bhai...Afghanistan Akhand bharat me aata hai na To Mughal bahar ke kaise hue @@rocky3850
Mere sher... Abe ek baat to btao jab tum kuch b bolte ho to to itna confidence kaha se late ho... Apni hi bewakoofi pe hasi nhi aati... Abe Pakistan Or Bangladesh k moolniwasi kaha chale gye... Ja k dekh delhi jaipur Or alag alag jagah pe apni jaan or izzat bacha k aye h taki apni bachio izzat ko bacha sake... Smjha namune...
@@deogiriyadav8399 chup be ling ka Pooja karne wale 😂😂🤡
@@rocky3850 bss kar bhai kitna jhut ko sahi manta rahegaaa
Just Watching the preview I can tell She really got Schooled very well.
She is certainly among those for whom facts doesn't matter.
Thank you
This is how interviews and discussions are meant to be, so informative!
Not only Savarkar many like Tilak, sanyal and Chidambaram pillai have written those petitions. And for Bhagat singh Savarkar was a heroic figure. Read his writings..
Savarkar is an advocate he know the format of letter. U can find the same in gandhi and naharu letter.
Lenin was a much bigger hero for Bhagat Singh so does that mean Lenin is a good human? Bhagat Singh liked Savarkar who wrote 1857 history not the one who gave hindutva ideology
@@sainath27186toh hindutva k baare mein bolne k liye khade rehne k liye problem kya tha? Ultimately hua kya ? Muslims le Gaye na Pakistan.
@@sainath27186 No lenin wasn't bigger inspiration. It was Savarkar from beginning of his revolutionary stages till he dies. He used to read communist related books at the end of his life i.e. in the jail. But from 1924 onwards Savarkar was hero for him. And u can't determine who is good or bad. Here the speaker compares Savarkar & Bhagat singh... So i replied according to that...
@@sainath27186 And one more... Savarkar published hindutva in 1923 & Bhagat singh Started worshiping him from 1924 as he write eulogizing article mentioning him as 'veer'. He also read Hindu padpadshahi written by Savarkar and quoted lines from that book in his jail diary...
Ek bar in madam ko exmuslim sahil, ex-Muslim zafar ya adam seeker se debate karni chahiye...
Bhai oo khud jhoota admi hain
Who are these people Historians, scholars with atleast graduation
She is not even a muslim…. @bevector bhakt
Bhai she doesn't know shit😂
Amd if she is so scholarly then she should destroy ex muslim in debate 😂
Bhai is hisab se aap ko dr zakir nike se baat kr ni chaiye 😂😂
Loved this conversation. Very informative. Thanks bro!
Glad you enjoyed it!
हीसा हला😂 रंगीला रसूल दूध कादूध पानी का पानी😂 यह एक किताब है x मुस्लिमभाई को सुनो❤
Great interviews to the point and very factual.
Specially really like to ye appropriate and honest about Savarkar and Bhagat Singh.
ruclips.net/video/it9spuIMEG0/видео.htmlsi=Ms-CzldU_mzG6Ui_
Dr Sharma is well-read and has in-depth knowledge of Indian History. She speaks with facts that are undeniable. God Bless!
seriously, muje sanskrit nahi aati aur me irfan habib ki history padh ke bata rahi hun ki akabar kitna mahan tha.
Her knowledge in surface level
She got benefit because defferent side of opinion is not exist in this podcast 😂
@@Gunpark829 you are absolutely incorrect, it's YOU who have little knowledge and then labelling Dr Ruchika, who is telling the actual FACTS as, having "surface level knowledge"
Really yaar pta nahi itni overrated bandi hai ye… inki kisi bhi subject me clarity utni he hai jitni inhone constitution per dikha di which is comparatively bhut jada asaan hona chahiye… I always ignore her… Gandhi ko Mahatma kehne per koi dikkat nahi hai Sawarkar ko Veer kehne per jal jati hai puri lobi… itne sare archeologists bahr aye hai TRS per unhone saaf bol dia hai enough evidence hai ke ye shit theory hai Aryaans ki bt dekh lo inhe Thapar G me nahi likha hai to humare pass nahi aya hai abhi tk… BC ek fact ka back puch lo to shakal ban jati hai… Arbi scholars ko ye quote ker sakte hai bt inko kbhi kuch Indian Scholar nahi milta milega wohi jo inki baat bolde bas uski degree sahi ho jati hai baki sab bas sir maar rahe the…
@@ajss3756aurangzeb mohammed gazni mahanthey lekin savarkar veer nahi they. She is so biased.
While Ruchika is a competent medieval historian, she is not equally strong on modern Indian history. Savarkar was not sent to the penal colony for seditious writing. He was convicted for the conspiracy to murder AMT Jackson, the British Collector of Nasik. The British were very very harsh in punishing political violence especially when it came to the killing of a British officer. The same principle applies to this day, in free India, where political violence or even suspicion of political violence is harshly punished. Secondly, the two interlocutors are abysmally ignorant about the forms of salutation prevailing in those days. The term " your obedient servant" was very commonly used in Victorian English and earlier. It did not signify subservience or abasement as it is nowadays believed. In fact, George Washington and Abraham Lincoln often signed with "your obedient and humble servant" as did many British luminaries in their letters. Savarkar cannot be faulted on this ground. Instead, he should be judged by his subsequent actions of collaboration with the British, and not participating in the freedom struggle, and for very strong grounds to believe that he was a part of the conspiracy to murder the Mahatma as established by the Kapoor Commission of enquiry.
maine kabhi aisa podcast nahi sunna, ek time per sunn rha tha and the other hand i'm using google,being,factcheck websites etc. to check, I really appreciate bro the way you ask Question the way you agreed and disagreed we need this kind podcast we don't need podcast where the podcaster only asking Question and giving gyan .
Shukriyaa bhai .
Do you know how many sikhs went to kaala paani did anyone wrote any bullshit. But these days anyone from panjab raise thier voice for democratic rights u people call them khalistani but when they did before 1947 promises were different
Lol
Plz explain why we read shaheed bhagat singh as terrorist in books...
Sir bhagat singh is ideal for whole nation but khalistaani leaders says bhagat singh is terrorist 😢video is on RUclips search it shame on that khalistaani called them sikh
@@vishalchimnani2324 go check documents of bhagat singh we do respect him too but in paperwork they still labelled him as terrorist.
Why you not call them terrorist who says they want hindu rashtr
@@navdeepsingh4745 who calls him terrorist congress?
@@vishalchimnani2324 no not congress read the British documents
Gandhi done a cost-benefit analysis?
then Savarkar too did a cost-benefit analysis.
Savarkar jailed for kala Pani for Book, not Merder
then you should also try 1 year in todays indian jail forget about kala pani then you get to know that jail is not a picnic spot
@@knowledgeispower6603 bro you misunderstood. Savarkar don't deserved Kala pani
sorry bro@@amit-tt8sz
The only thing " mass conversion nahi hua tha warna wo population me dikhta"...what do you think about kashmiri pandit issue was it not an attempt of mass conversion the only difference that time and this time was they had transport problem so they have to be converted and this time Hindus did not have transport problem so they ran away or got killed
Yani kuch bhi 😮
सावरकर को तीसरी आजीवन सज़ा (डॉ. आनंद जयराम बोडस)
सोनपतकी, मुकुंद 1980. नदी के उस पार | पुरंदरे प्रकाशन, पुणे
सोवानी, एम.वी. 1967. मृत्युंजय सावरकर: सचित्र जीवनी चित्रसाधन प्रकाशन, पुणे
हर्षे, डी.एस. 1966. सावरकर-दर्शन | डी.एस. हर्षे प्रकाशन, सतारा
क्षीरसागर, प्रकाश 1989. दीप्तिमान सूजन. स्वतंत्र वीर बनाम. सावरकर,
श्रीवास्तव, हरिंद्र, खोत, अनुराधा (ट्रांस.) 1996। एक झड़प - दुश्मन के शिविर में. सावरकर मेमोरियल सेंटर, बड़ोद
--?--1957. आत्मकथा वीनस प्रकाशन, पुणे
--?--1958. सावरकर के विविध दर्शन. वीनस प्रकाशन, पुणे
1962, सावरकर की स्मृतियाँ। अधिकारी प्रकाशन, पुणे
1969, महायोगी वीर सावरकर, वीर सावरकर प्रकाशन, मुंबई
1973, सावरकर आत्मकथा (प्रस्तावना), मैजेस्टिक प्रकाशन, मुंबई
1972, सावरकर आत्मकथा (भगुर) | मैजेस्टिक प्रकाशन, मुंबई
1978, स्वतंत्रता पर वीर सावरकर के भाषणों और लेखकों की सूची | स्वतंत्र वीर सावरकर साहित्य अध्ययन मंडल, मुंबई
सावरकर पर श्रद्धांजलि (आचार्य अत्रे)
ज्वालामुखी का अग्नि नृत्य - बनाम श्रीमान। जोशी
सावरकर की खोज - वाई.डी. फ्लैप
क्रांतिकारियों के पितामह - आचार्य अत्रे
सावरकर के सामाजिक कार्य की सच्चाई और विकृति - शेष राव मोरे
सावरकर का तर्कवाद एक चिकित्सा अध्ययन - शेषराव मोरे
रत्नागिरी महोत्सव - आचार्य बालाराव सावरकर
हिंदू सभा पर्व (खंड 1 और 2) - आचार्य बालाराव सावरकर
सोथा पर्व - आचार्य बालाराव सावरकर
सावरकर जीवनी - धनंजय कीर
सावरकर ने ज्योत नाम दिया - प.भा. भाइयों
सावरकर जीवनी - शि.एल. करंदीकर
दरियापार - मुकुंद सोनपतकी
गांधी हत्या और सावरकर की मानहानि - शेषराव मोरे
39:23
Ok then Tell
How many Rajputs Marathas Sikhs who won or lost took away the Muslim females as loot.
Also, tell how many open *mandis* of Muslim women were organised by Hindu or Sikh kings in their era ?
I would love to find Ms. Sharma and ask these questions face to face.
Bro she is fake and shameless women.... Ye bs hindu ko bura bnane pr lgi rhti h ..moti rkam aati h unki taraf se
The host should have been done much better research if he wanted to counter the guest!
hey, Utkarsh! About the religious institution taking tax and all wala part, hindu temples are regarded as god's own property in courts, Rama was representative of the Ram temple conflict, there is a person who is no more who is quoted in the court for the decisions, moreover the ayyappa temple(Sabarimala) in Kerala, women are not allowed, the temple says the reason is coz ayyappa was a brahmachari and so females are not allowed, this is one of the reason temples are considered private and not equally treated as other prayer places! I hope you point this out in a short or something i like ur centralist pov over topics
Perfect . Will research and address
@@utkarshgaur. good to know mate
U should invite Vikram sampath for his view on savarkar.
Infact both should debate.
He doesn't reply to the small creators .
Big egos
Aukat😂
She does not have expertise on savarkar or gandhi for a discussion with sampath one has to bring guha but ofcourse both won't come here
@@ashrayrs True lot of things she said in this podcast are factually incorrect, she at best is a mediocre youtuber.
We need more discussions on real history
The fact that she still talks about Aryan Migration/Invasion Theory is enough to say that she has completely obsolete knowledge.
Aryan migration is true its proven by genetical evidence
Bro did you know genetical science? 😂😂
If not then go and take a genetics test😊
@@ShaghilSubhani did you even understand his statement that you are jumping to genetics!!
Aryan invasion theory was propagated by the British because they were surprised to see a civilization that existed without the knowledge of the famed adam/eve and wanted to show some connection to their abrahamic beliefs!!
Since you touched on genetics, go and figure out if geneaology will point all humankind to a certain adam/ eve!!
It has to be multiple male/female pairs that spawned the human civilization.
@@ShaghilSubhanishut the f up😂😂😂it's already debunked
His parents doing palm face, is our genetic so bad
bhai idhar bhi fight hoga ya rajat sisodia fight wala disappointment milega
Islamic methodology:- Muslims use Quran as primary source then muslims take hadith which is historic documentation of prophet Muhammad and his companion. Everything mentioned in Quran cannot be rejected even single word, the moment any muslim rejects anything from Quran he lefts the position of being muslim. Then to understand any verse from Quran muslims look at the time of prophet Muhammad (hadith) and the context which was going then and the reason why that verse in Quran which he/she want to understand exists. After understanding the historic background then he/she looks what scholars have understood from that verse and then we have the complete understanding of that one verse.
Toh matlab Quran eek storybook hai?
@@rohitgaikwad7582 nahh law book hai.. jo humlog ka action ko govern krta hai.. story book main mythological characters or impractical laws mentioned ri ta hai jaise Mahabharat.. smjhee..
@@reyanal9659 acha, toh fir Allah ke laws abrogate bhi ho sakte honge, Allah khud vaise keh Raha hai Quran mai.
Eek baat samajh nahi ati, agar aap omnipotent, omniscient aur omnipresent. Toh fir aap woh chiz bologe hi kyu? Ya fir aap khud eek sadharan admi ho jo galtiya karta hai, jo jyada probable hai.
@@reyanal9659 law book hai, acha isiliye aap non muslims ko worst of creatures mante ho (verse 98:6 aur 8:55)
Allah ne apke hate sikhayi hai apko.
@@rohitgaikwad7582 Allah s.w.t is authority himself isliye god ka law abrogate ni ho shakta. Dont confuse it with hindusim. Allah s.w.thas fixed the law for us thus his law for whole Human kind will not change until the day of judgement. proof - 5.15-16 O People of the Book! Now Our Messenger has come to you, revealing much of what you have hidden of the Scriptures and disregarding much. There certainly has come to you from Allah a light and a clear Book through which Allah guides those who seek His pleasure to the ways of peace, brings them out of darkness and into light by His Will, and guides them to the Straight Path.
yaar ye hijaab se aryan invasion topic shift bahut abrupt laga...cut kiya tha ya actually aisa hua?
Jyda heated ho gya tha
@@utkarshgaur. Achaa....😅😁
Or teacher ji Gujarat me bhi harappa ke evidence hai or madhya Pradesh me bhi or bangal me bhi or bangal me toh british officer ke ghar ke niche hi ek site mila hai😂 unhone chupane ki koshish ki thi....
Ap delhi ki kya baat karahe ho😂
Delhi me toh mauryan times ke strictures mile hai purana kila ke niche ...
Harrappa bhi mil jayega kuch samay baad chinta nhi😂
She doesn’t talk about Abhinav Bharat and India home rule society, London under Shyam Ji Krishan Ji Verma when she talks about Savarkar.
Fake historian.
39:42 toh fir aap muslims ke nabi ko bhi condemn kar do,
Sunan Abi Dawud 2155
Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah(ﷺ) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah (ﷺ) were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.
Aur iski Quranic verse hai 4:24.
the interviewer seems so unprepared and had no well formed questions to ask.....glad to see Dr. Ruchika still managing to bring so much to the table to discuss.
Didi aryans are alsl mentioned in Mahabharata arya word and you are a historian recently a 26000 years old idol called kalp vigraha of lord shiva found in nepal as your theory aryan came in 1500 bc than how 26000 years ago an idol was there in Nepal
1:00:41 she is distonian/historian and not archeologists or DNA scientist so I will asked all of you to read or search disha ahluwalia [archeological] who work on that site and niraj rai [DNA Scientist] who published studies on this topic
They both debunk aryan picnic theory 😂
सावरकर यदि वीर नही थे माफीवीर भी थे तो क्या हुआ ?इससे भारत का कोई नुकसान हुआ?? लेकिन गांधी और नेहरू की भीरुता से देश बर्बाद हुआ इसके टुकड़े हो गए है।तो यदि वीर सावरकर माफी वीर है तो गांधी/नेहरू नपुंसकता वीर है
Guru hargobind singh guru teg bahadur singh guru Gobind Singh ke char sahibzaade ne ase hi shadat di thi chhatrapati sambhaji maharaj ne kis conversation se inkar kia tha didi conversation kai salon se hota hai I'm Sindhi do search history of Sindh there was invader named mirkshah was converting 1000 person to muslim and this is written in document or khilji ek rapist ki tarif karte sharam nhi ayi
agree 💯
She is very rudimentary in her knowledge of Savarkar For starters She claims there is no documentation of the “Marseilles incident “ which referred to Savarkar escaping from the ship to the shores of France Not only is there newspaper reports but official documentation between two International governments ( France and England )
Comparing him to other great revolutionaries is silly as they all fought for freedom in different ways ( Gandhi with non violence, Bhagat Singh thro martyrdom, Savarkar thro underground revolutionary network , Bose with the INA)
In Kala pani as was the norm you could apply for petition to be released He did that 6 times not 9 as she claims and not only for himself but for a lot of other prisoners as well since he was a lawyer and could use the legal language in those days In most of these he has stated that if his presence was holding up other prisoners release then they should be released and it would give him as much pleasure as his own would have. The British never trusted him and kept in tortuous solitary confinement
Savarkar was a poet, novelist, writer, playwright, historian and a revolutionary freedom fighter who sacrificed a lot for India. As children, we grew up learning lessons of his bravery in our history. He established Indias first underground revolutionary network the Abhinav Bharat It had branches all over the world including England For his revolutionary methods, the British sentenced him to 50 years of imprisonment in Andaman's Cellular Jail where he was made to undergo rigorous solitary confinement for several months, standing handcuffs and hell like torture (released with limited freedoms after serving 13 torturous years in prison). But his spirit never died. In Cellular prison, he composed and wrote poetries on prison walls with thorns and pebbles when the British were merciless and even denied him pen and paper. His poems like Sagara pran talmalala (O Great Sea, My Heart Aches for the Motherland), Jayostute (written in praise of freedom) are very inspiring and demonstrate the kind of love he had for his motherland.
His books include “ 1857 ..The First Indian War of for Independence, which the British had earlier referred to as the "Sepoy Mutiny", changed the way history was written Large part of his literature is dedicated to mother India, the land he deeply loved.
A forward thinking Indian who fought caste orthodoxy with a lot of ruthlessness. A humanist and one of the first Indian political leaders to build a pan-Hindu temple where a former 'untouchable' was a priest. A Nationalist who exhorted India to make atomic bombs and believed it was ridiculous and irrational to follow astrology when Russians and Americans were striving to land on the Moon and Mars. A rationalist who refused to consider cow as holy and chose to call it only a very useful animal. An environmentalist who considered cremation in electric crematoriums more clean and efficient (eco-friendly in modern terms). For all the sacrifices he made, India popularly refers to him as 'Swatantryaveer' Savarkar, or simply Veer.
wow very valuable information.
At first this person has shallow knowledge of history but he is opposing her views considering her own .
When mahrashtra CM yashwantrao went to meet savarkar at his residence it was the day when bhagat singh faasi was declared savarkar even said bhagat singh is not a freedom fighter .. - source yashwantrao chavan biography
Please invite prakhar shrivastav vs ruchika sharma.he has written wonderful book to expose Maulana gazi.
She said "God bless his soul" when she took David Rikes name.
Loved the host, rarely hosts fight back like he did, and check facts on the spot, kudos to you man but at the same time there was duning kruger at play there. Dude with all humility are wrong on hijab thing, its mandatory. You can easily find arguments against it but this what we call "make up potna" to make regressive ideas look pretty, Hijab is compulsory but keep on doing it bruh. You are antidote to Ranveer.
Great conversation. 👍
Glad you enjoyed it!
Bhai bring Kushal Mehra Charvaka podcast. You'll get the response. He's well versed in these topics
Would really appreciate if the host doesn't involve himself debating and he should act as a co ordinator and be objective here!!
Well that's not my objective
Savarkar also justified rape of Muslim women as a political tool. In his book he wrote: "Our molestation shall be avenged on Muslim women".
At the end of his life Savarkar wrote a book in Marathi, Six Glorious Epochs of Hindu History. FULL of HISTORICALLY INACCURATE GENERALISATIONS that essentialise whole communities, the book reserves particular venom for Muslim ‘demons’ as the catalysts for the downfall of Hindu glory. He saw religion as actually playing a very small part of his wider political project and therefore it is important to separate Hinduism from Hindutva: the project of creating a Hindu Nation.
Total galat
@@utkarshgaur.
No you are WRONG! Just like your hijab argument.
Instead of living with half baked facts, study! Pick his book and read also, regarding hijab go talk to a Islamic scholar yourself (don't pick up any random molvi from any mosque).
@@Amd107bhai apko malum hai hijab ane ka context?
@@Amd107 Reality toh yeh bhi ki 55 ka Mohammad chada 9saal ki ashia per din raat
@@vishalupadhyay416 jaise Ramu Seeta pe? Because Ram married Sita when she was 6 (as per Skanda Purana III.ii.30.8-9)
Arey teacher aryan dna kuch hota hi nhi hai... Apne toh bataya hi nhi ki aryan dna kya hai or woh aryan dna kyu hai uska evidence kya hai??
R1a1a jo hai woh so called aryans ke pehle se india me exist karta haii......
Or bhai duniya ka sabse bada journal arganization hai nature usko jaake pado dr niraj rai ki research woh khud ek researcher hai...
Isne sab jhut bola hai or yeh interviewer bhai ko kuch pata nhi hai 😂chupchap beth ke sun raha hai😂
This is how i understand, there are 3 types of secularism based on the context of their prevailing culture.
1. No religion - communist countries like china.
2. No interference or state is different from religious affairs - western countries
3. Equal promotion of religion by state - Indian secularism.
That is the reason the Indian constitution allows every religion to preach ,practice and have their own religious affairs.
We will never get our constitution correct if we compare ourselves with the western context of constitutionalism. We as a society are much different from western society. Our DIVERSITY is one of the biggest reasons , whether it is cultural, religious, linguistics, ethnicity etc.
Bhai national culture hindu hi toh hai...
Tum batao kya hai national culture?
Hijab hai india ka cultures yeh bakri Eid??
National culture hota hai ek region ka culture or woh region ek country ke form me bhi exist kar sakta hai... Simple
Bhai angrez yeh koi or bhi jab india ko dekhta hai toh usko kya pata chalta hai as indian culture???
Hindu culture hi milta hai na usse??
Musalmano yeh non dharmik ka cultures toh nhi kehta as Indian culture!!!
Or hindu abhi khatam nhi hue na tab hue the.... Toh fir woh log jinhone is zamin ki sari chize taiyar ki unko hi milega national culture ka zimebar...
Naki Saudi Arabia ke cultures ko
So there were lots of unlearning for both audience(including me) and interviewer 😂
Homo Erectus ki Timeline hai 2Mya to 40K Years.
Homo Neanderthese ki Timeline hai 6L- 7L Years to 30K Years.
Homo Sapiens ki Timeline 3.3L to 60K Years.
Homo Sapiens Sapiens(Modern Human) ki Timeline hai 70K to Present Day.
Ruchika Mam 🔥🔥🔥🔥🇮🇳Proud of you
Amazing discussion. Amazing Ruchika, as always. And Utkarsh was amazing in instigating Ruchika to explain in detail. India needs more of such discourse.
Savarkar and brothers use to refrain when asked to join our protest openly fearing the officers -trialoknath chatterjee
Or central asian dna rehna koi badi baat nhi hai... Steppis bohot aye india me scythians indo parthians indo greeks sakas hunas and many more..
Or isme se bohot central asian the or ajkal toh inke jaise log aryan or steppis ko mila rahe hai😂😂
Wah😂
Or steppis aye 5bce ke baad mostly...
Pado is interviewer ki tarah sirf sir mat hilao
Didi bhagat singh's ideal was savarkar after his death savarkar's peom found from his barak and the movement he joined under chandrashekhar azad was also inspired by savarkar even they had their photos in there office
36:00
Why your progressive anti sharia Khilji burnt Nalanda ? RAJ DHARAM ka palan karte hue 🤡?
Madam aap na to chanakya to manti ho or na hi veer savarkar ji ko.. aur jinko janti bi ho unko bi incomplete janti ho
Bhai ekdum WhatsApp wale saare questions leke Aaya tha... Like his hate for Gandhi & Mughals was totally from WhatsApp messages
Hhahahahahahhahhahahah
Dear bro jast verifey what she said.dont spread utter lay what she said.I did not find anything regarding that velidates rapeing a woman during war time is okay in manu smruti.
heated debates has responded to this false accusations. These leftists are like keedas, they continue to rot our civilization and culture
The best evidence based book on who inhabited the present day India is written by Tony Joseph. Must read. 'Early Indians' is the title of the book.
Comparing Bhagat Singh with Savarkar on every sentence demeans both. Bhagat Singh read savarakars books. The man spent 27 years in jail for fighting for the country , stopping it after coming out of jail doesn’t make his efforts any less. Compared Dr. Ruchika he served the nation well. Part of his ideology is ruling the country currently. And it’s still going strong.
27 years was spent by Nelson Mandela not coward Savarkar
what to expect from leftists historians? quitab minar is hindu or Mughal document Ruchika?
Please read bhagvat geeta krishna says the one who is born on earth is shudra after diksha from guru or his karma makes him bhramhan or kshtrya or vaishya but no one is born bhramhan or vaishya it is proof document read it
I'm comparing Vikram sampath and this lady and my respect for him has increased because he is spitting out facts with understanding we really need more historians like him, aaur pata nahi konsi aaisi school hai jo nailpaint aaur kajal allow kar rahi hai 🙄
There are so many things I can debunk in matter of seconds from this video, this madam doesn’t seem to be acquainted with knowledge outside the the NCERT realms, and during Akbar the Mughal period was in its “peak” made me really chuckle, nevertheless every persons evolves, keep growing and please try reading Vikram sampaths book on Sarvarkar.
Hey Utkarsh I want know how we can reach her we would love to give her a free history class.
1:00:06 manipulation of facts
That study says that compared DNA from a very old skeleton found in Rakhigarhi with Iranian DNA Samples show that there is no similarities where as compared with South asian its similar and also show no changes in DNA in terms of drastic changes.( Indian subcontinent is one of most generically diverse so I am not making racially point and also DNA studies are making these points )
And what she is doing is proving that Vedas are aryan with distorted facts and then using DNA studies on this basis 😂 what a clown
[ in her own words you should prove with multiple sources of fact not with circumstantial evidence regarding Veda]
Dr ruchika sharma 🔥🔥
01:06:10 god bless his soul 😂😂😂. Atheist ideology but religious upbringing.
Came here from pranav's story.🤭
lol BJP and sangh creating an identity crisis causing confusion and forgetting current issues of food shortages, water shortages, unemployment and crisis of daily living issues. Amazing tomfoolery going on India
Why do we have to choose between the approaches of our freedom fighters they were all right and had their own perspective. Lets not malign their name after 100 years
Kaha se aate hai ye log
37:42
If Rajputs and Muslims are so open minded they why Muslim women weren’t marrying Rajputs kings 😂?
Right way to expose the librandu, kudos!
Interesting debate I loved it
Is koi b is namuni ko historian manta h.. To phir uska bhagwaan hi malik h..
Thank you to Prof. Ruchika! ❤
😊
Or mehr garh ke alawa bhi bohot hai.. jaise bhirana site in haryana which is atleast 9000 years old... Older then mehrgarh
लगा राजनीतिज्ञ रहा अगले चुनाव पर घात,
राजपुरुष सोचते किन्तु, अगली पीढ़ी की बात।
हो जाता नरता का तब इतिहास बड़ा,
बड़े लोग जब पर्वत से टकराते हैं।
नर को देंगे मान भला वे क्या, जो जन
एक दूसरे को नाहक धकियाते हैं?
Bade he mahan kavi malum padte hai ? Aap he kaa lekh h kya ,???
महान कवि दिनकर जी की पंक्तियाँ है । यहाँ सटीक बैठ रही थी तो लिख दी छोटे भाई
Nrw here... Fun too
Thank fully she clarified its Aryan Migration is true . Not invasion.
And it’s well documented that Arab was not migration but invasion.
ppl say to keep Gandhi as a person and Gandhi as a politician apart from each other
in order to talk about his experiments
why not say the same about ram rahim or aasa ram?
Who did Gandhi rape?
It would be great to listed abjeet chavda with this lady
The fact she I telling is very precise and accurate .
50:29 aur tum kar bhi nahin sakti idea of Islam ko result Varna agale Din Tumhari last tumhare ghar ke bahar milegi. Yahi Fark Hai Islam aur Hinduism mein
Bhai ye aadmi kitna irritating hai, doosre ko poori baat rakhne hi nahi deta.
Sach baat hai batmeej bhi hu
@@utkarshgaur. Sirf battameez nahi, kaafi topics pe uneducated bhi ho and you didn't do your proper research.
Han thk hain yaar khyal rkho apna tab tak
She knows Farsi but not Sanskrit. Utkarsh exposed this communist lady. "Your obedient servant" written by Gandhi & Savarkar.
42:49 constitution mai word hone se secular kaise kya ho gaya, jo word add hi 1976 mai hua?
Aur fir jo initial draft banaye thai, unhone kisi toh basis pe secular word add nahi kiya hoga?
Yaha par aap brainstrom nahi karr rahi, baki sabh jagah kar deti hai.
Please read article 15 of the Indian constitution
@@madhurkukretidabral4452 are bhai, article 15 padh rahe ho toh thik se yeh bhi padh lo,
*Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the
State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially
and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and
the Scheduled Tribes*
Yahi ground ho jata hai ki India eek secular state nahi hai, jabb aap kisi varg ko special treatment de rahe ho, waha par hi secularism (French definition) khatam ho jata hai.
Aur isiliye unhone, founding fathers ne secular shabh ka prayog kabhi nahi kiya pledge mai, kyuki India secular hai hi nahi.
Indian secularism is a farce, isko dusra naam do, secular shabh ki dhajiya math udao.
Par Indira Gandhi ko West ko appease karna tha, isiliye yeh nautanki ki unhone.
Bhai agar karna hi tha, toh founding fathers karr dete secular add, nahi kiya, kyuki woh apne intellect ke sath yeh dhoka dhadi nahi karna chahte the.
@@madhurkukretidabral4452 bhai app khud hi thik se eek baar article 15 padh lo.
Clear as day pata chal jayega ki India secular state ho hi nahi sakta, according to the real french definition of the word.
*Nothing in this article or in clause (2) of article 29 shall prevent the
State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.*
Yeh chiz anti secular hai.
Aur jo aaj India mai hai, usse dusra naam dena chaie. Founding fathers ko itni samajh toh hogi hi na, isiliye toh unhone woh word include nahi kiya.
Indira Gandhi intellectually dishonest thi, unhone West ko please karne ke liye yeh word add kiya, aur kuch nahi.
@@rohitgaikwad7582 India doesn't follow Western or French fo of secularism directly. It follows secularism with no interference of religious institutions over the GOI but the GOI can interfere in cases of they needed.while granting resect to each and every tradition. Article 29 talks about safeguarding each other's dignity . And the preamble of the constitution is only a manifesto not a guiding instrument in the court of law.
Gandhi 27 saal ke liye kala paani bhi toh nhi gye
Toh unhe 9 baar maafi naama likhne ki jarurat hi nhi padi
Baap re itna sara jhut ek he podcast me 😂 ye dadhi wale bhai bhi pacha nhi paa raha iska jhuth
if gandhi can be mahatma then sarvarkar also a veer
Please follow this interesting channel about savarkar ruclips.net/video/it9spuIMEG0/видео.htmlsi=Ms-CzldU_mzG6Ui_
😂😂😂 what is your age ? What do you know about Gandhi accept which you watch on WhatsApp
tavheed- wat do u know abt muhammad except wat u hear from mullas😂
@@tavheedahmad609experiment with truth book try karna.....Fir kabhi Mahatma nahi bolega
first of all whatsapp is chat app not for watching. and surely i am more learned than you because i don't get my education from madarsas😂😂😂😂@@tavheedahmad609
Bhai ish madam ki koi bhi video dekh lo ye kabi bhi
Quran ka bare m kuch nhi blti or Muslim jo bhar sa aya tha unko achha bta ti hai
Ye hmsa manusmriti pa bolti hai
Always manusmriti pr bolti hai
Hamesh ushko glt batati hai
Always
Or quran ko always protect krti
To bhai samjho ye dr Sahiba Hinduism sa nfrt krti hai
Dekho bhaio ek or propaganda wali aa gai
Pta h ushka pass bht knowledge hai
Ishi knowledge sa glt ko bhi sahi kr rhi hai
Pashupati seal ke bare mein kya Kahenge aap. vah to indus valley civilization se mila hai