NEVER Carry These Guns or Calibers!..(Legal Liability Reasons!?!)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Support TYMPPP by Buying Official TYMPPP Merch!
yankees-swag-b...
Totally NOT a Backup Channel for TYMP!!!
/ @theyankeegearhead
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @theyankeemarshal
This channel and TYMP Pistol Project are both fully viewer supported. No Sponsors Allowed!
Please help by becoming a patron.
/ theyankeemarshal
Subscribestar Link
www.subscribest...
Original score: Madison Stegall
Super Artwork: Daniel Greenfield
It doesn't matter what we believe, it matters what a jury believes.
They believe wrong way too many times. I have lost all faith in our legal system.
Exactly!!! I sat on a criminal felony trial. The DA and the lawyers never take an oath. They are allowed to lie, and I can tell you they most certainly do lie!!!! The DA will paint the ugliest picture of the defendant that he can paint. Example = the sign on your property that reads “A .357 magnum is faster than a 911 call.”, will most likely land you in prison when you’re involved in a self defense shooting. Never, never, matters what you and I, and others think, it matters only how well the DA can make an innocent man look guilty!!!! Most of the time the jury buys the ugly picture!!!!
Long as I survive I care less what the Jory believes either ...Being in Jail for murder isnt as bad as being in Jail as a sex offender ;)
@@XDWX Say it isn't so ... (((THEIR))) scheme of "Just-Us".
When my life matters. Im liable for my life and need a reliable option. I will not be infringed or handicapped by criminals making fake arbitrary laws. Try it and find out how far it gets you. I am a legacy if the forefathers. I will make tyrants fear me. You shouldnt fear me having guns. You should fear me making highly explosive weapons.
If im using my gun its to save my life and dont want to limit my ability to do so. Its funny how your supposed to worry about the "rules" in a situation where there are no rules for someone trying to hurt you
The only thing dumber than going to McDonald’s is going to a McDonald’s in a bad part of town. 😂
Or a Waffle House in Georgia!
My McDonald's days ended when Big Macs hit four bucks.
Flat on my back knocked down by a huge drugged up maniac (who broke into my house), making a 3rd attempt to break my neck with a kick, I was going to be charged with 1st degree premeditated murder if he died. Dont tell me about a "good shoot". Let me tell you about a DA salivating over a promotion and more money. (they also wanted to know why I didnt use my 22 target pistol instead of my 45SAA Colt.)
From a comment below in addition to the DA's bias/ambition: "The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." has nothing to do with what actually goes on in the courthouse."
Exactly! The DA and lawyers never take an oath to tell the truth, and I can tell you , after sitting on a felony criminal trial, they most certainly do LIE! The DA always paints the ugliest picture of the defendant that he can paint. The jury most often buys the DA’s lies. The sign on your property that reads “A .357 magnum is faster than a 911 call.”, will most likely land you in prison!!!!
I had never heard the term “law fare used” until a politically motivated “justice” department made Donald Trump public enemy #1. Not until the justice system goes back to being about justice will I ever trust so called “law and order.”
Cartoon characters in the prosecutor corner! PERIOD
See Current example of your comment WHY NYC IS A HELL BOUND CITY State Supreme Judge 😅and his daughter violating the Rico act making bank off this so called hush money case and that lying Cohen WHEN PUTIN DROPS ONE WE ARE ALL TARGETED in Major Blue CITIES BY THE USELESS HUSH MONEY CASE.
THERE IS SOMETHING IN SPACE FORCE TRUMP KNOWS ABOUT REAGANS Talking about Starwars. AND BIDEN US NOT PRIVY TO IT MEANS GOD FORBID AT THE DNC CONVENTION BIDEN IS TOSSED SE UNND THE CACKLING HYENA SITS IN THE OVAL OFFICE!? JUST SAYING🤔
You could always choose to defend yourself against tyrannical government agents.
Everyone feels more secure carrying a big caliber but the truth is that a 22lr will get the job done. Claude Werner has famously stated that he has NEVER seen a case where a civilian self defender using a 22lr and getting at least one shot on target has gotten killed. What you "hear" online, in training classes, or at gun shops, is just that, hearsay.
Whew, I was afraid you would say my 20mm would be too much.
Dirty Harry said a city is full of cars. Cars have windshields. 20mm sounds about right.
Sounds good to me but maybe not so good for your neighbours.
"The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth." has nothing to do with what actually goes on in the courthouse.✌
Absolutely. The prosecutor can lie, and they do. They can frame the facts how they want, and they will create a grey area
It sure the "F" don't. They do what they want. Rules are for U..... not them...insane I'd say
The gentleman you spoke about was shot 1/4 mile from my house and I knew him personally.
We live in the mountains in a National forest and the man you spoke of was a volunteer at the local humane society and always took dogs out to walk them for exercise every week. He was walking 3 dogs on a trail at the edge of town and the shooter was a man from the nearest big city and he was also walking the trail.
The dogs and the the guy walking them met the other guy on the trail and the shooter pulled his pistol saying later he was threatened by the dogs and the dog walker begged him not to shoot and backed away with his hands up in a defensive manner and the guy shoot him multiple times one shot going though the mans hand as he held them up.
The shooter was a doctor and had money and very good lawyers of he would have gotten a murder charge which he deserved. It was a bad shoot and he got away with it.
The man killed was a good guy according to many, many witnesses and was murdered by a guy carrying a firearm who wasn't trained well on when & how to use it properly.
It was a sad day and an even sadder trial and outcome.
Y Harold Fish was a retired high school teacher. The man shot had a history of violent behavior. There is evidence and testimony that he was charging Fish when fish fired.
When I was a cop I was once in court I was asked by a defense attorney why I carried a .45. I said because they don't have a .46. We had to supply our own weapon in those days. The judge had a good laugh and told me weeks after the case was over that he carried a Colt Commander .45.
I was a firearm instructor with a law enforcement agency. You are correct, it’s the circumstances and your actions that are relevant in court. Your equipment is not relevant as long as you haven’t made unreasonable modifications.
Worry about knowing the law, do not be concerned about equipment legally obtained.
.... not even when your SW500 SNUB NOSE goes through the bad guy and into the guts of a bystander?
@@MSS-wx5fd
Don’t fire if a bystander is in the line of fire.
@MSS-wx5fd
Can't be any worse than the 13 rounds you missed the primary target with.
.45 Commander with Glaser Safety Slugs. My Doctor who is also a member of my gun club did some of his residency in a big-bad city hospital ER. Saw wounds from a SD shooting with Glasers! Was hard to stop the bleeding.
Where I live it's legal to carry open or concealed. I never worry about what the caliber size is. It's purely for defense.
I agree with you yank ..but if a anti gun blood thirsty DA starts asking why you were carrying a 500 magnum dangerous game gun... it could get ugly for you...basically trying to say you went with the deadlier option ... again it's BS but it's the world we are in..
But these people are always arguing that they need to lower the capacity regulations because guns are for hunting and not self defense? Aren’t you talking about a hunting revolver? Even if you occasionally use it to legally go hunting?
The DA and the lawyers never take an oath to tell the truth. I sat on a felony criminal trial and I can tell you that they most certainly do lie. The DA will paint the ugliest picture of the defendant that he can paint. Does NOT matter what you and I, and Yankee thinks, it matters only what the jury thinks, and the jury most often will buy the lies that the DA is feeding them!!!! The sign on someone’s property that reads “ A .357 magnum is faster than a 911 call.”, will most likely land that “someone “ in prison when they are involved in a self defense shooting!!!!!!!!!
It starts sooner than the DA. I've seen police reports that will write up every feature the firearm is capable of even if they weren't relevant to the shooting. So if you have a 9mm with threaded barrel, rails, high capacity magazines - they'll write a book just about the 'silencer capable' 'tactical' gun used. It serves no purpose to the case but to potentially bias the judge and jury that someone who buys something like that must be dangerous. In reality that's just how guns are built now and most gun owners don't care about all of that. Police are anti-gun a lot of the time and they'll disarm you if they can.
@@paulanderson771 The immigrants are British people now
I would also consider carrying a firearm you woildn't be sad losing. Some states, like the ones on the left coast, make it very hard to get your firearm back after it is "secured" for an investigation.
I miss the 90s when I could carry a Deagle in my Jnco's.
What do you carry the deagle in now?
Just one more reason why you need Attorneys on Retainer!!!... Chandler, Arizona... Marc Victor 👍👍👍
This is probably one of the most important,if not the most important videos you’ve posted. I think I have watched your videos from the beginning and I really appreciate your work.
Remember Dick Tracy carrying a 357 mag that would go through a car block.
That is why I love a 357 mag. Can’t afford the 44 mag.
Forgot to mention that a "good attorney" over the course of the 2 years they'll take to bring a felony case to court is going to cost $200K, not counting bail and private investigations which are often required. Basically, if you don't have donors funding your defense, it's the end of your financial life, win or lose.
I have a CCL, but in this corrupt blue state, I stay away from that shitehole of a city Seattle and I continue not to carry because criminals are protected.
Ehhh not really, about 5-10 Thousand,which most people still don't have, but it's definitely not gonna cost that. If you need 200k to win the case you were probably guilty lol. and unless they are seriously just delaying it because they know they'll look stupid brining it to trial it'll be a lot shorter than 2 years.
Charter arms 44 special bulldog works for me but not necessarily for everyone
Good 5 shots defensive revolver.
You ARE in danger going to a McDonalds, but only if you actually eat the "food." Going to a McDonalds late at night is just stupid.
It depends on where you live, and if you pay attention to who and what is around you. Remember, using common sense and trusting your gut can go a long way in keeping you out of bad situations.
I carry a Rock Island 1911 and 10 mm Auto, I shoot Underwood 200 grain hard cast lead, that is my woods gun. I carry because I live in Pennsylvania and we have some big black bears,. For my everyday carry I carry a 40 Smith& Wesson m&p 40c told it's 13:14 rounds, and my self-protection round is 155 grain xtps by Underwood!
Great choice! UW 155 Gr 10mm is absolutely brutal.
I do know that it's a good idea to stay away from ammo marketed with aggressive or lethal sounding names or designs. It's best to stick with what the cops use or FMJ.
An additional note, I'm a bit of an anomaly to many gun guys. A common phrase is " I wish a m'fer would". I'm the opposite. I'm, "I hope a m'fer doesn't". I don't want to shoot anyone. The only things I want to shoot are paper targets at the range. Say, that's a little white lie, I think seeing a tanarite target explode after I shoot it would be pretty cool. Having admitted that, I can honestly say that I only want to shoot what any sane individual would deem a target. Whether that's paper, metal, plastic, or tanarite, the idea is no person or creature is harmed. I carry to defend myself and hope I never have to. If I do however, I want the best tool that I can use. Period.
Foundation laid….
Wait, you don't enjoy shooting cheap 2-liter soda pop and Barbasol shaving cream? 😁
I shot a 20 lb mostly empty propane tank with a .556 and the thing shot dirt 30 feet in the air. Kinda cool.
Exactly. 100%
@@OOICU812 I haven't yet but it does sound fun.
Speaking of body armor, have you seen how Underwood 10mm Penetrators sail through soft body armor?
I carry either a 380 or a 9mm. I was attacked in a parking lot, I also have a sap(blackjack) my attacker had a knife and no gun. I hit him twice, once in the ribs and once in the neck. I could have killed him but I chose to just stop him and wait for the police. I was arrested for carrying an illegal weapon. I spent the night in jail. I got to see a judge the next morning. The judge was so mad at the police officer I thought he was going to fine the man. The judge said: This man had a firearm and didn’t use it and you arrested this man for defending himself. Case dismissed.
I did lose my sap, they took that.
What is sap?
@@catharsis21 like the doohickey in movies that people get smacked in the head with?
A SCOTUS case from Massachusetts about stun guns found the stun gun was in common use and couldn't be made illegal. Maybe you can use that to get your SAP back.
A couple pad locks in a stocking can accomplish most of what a SAP does.
Yeah, like rolls of quarters in a pouch Charles Bronson used in the movie Death Wish.@@iowa_lot_to_travel9471
I carry a 10MM regularly
@@dancruze na, just like the glock 10MM
@jeffhays1968 oh no the GLOCK 10MM RELIGOUS FANATICS ARE HERE!
Lol
I edc the glock 29 10mm regularly 😎, FAFO!!! GLOCK POWER!!!😅
I'm a Springfield 10mm compact fan. I love my gun.
@@dancruze 🙌 can I get a amen
My every day conceal carry is a Glock 30 Gen 4 .45 ACP
I carry a Glock 31 gen 5 .46 ACP
Agree that caliber choice is less relevant. Personally, I would avoid modified triggers and certain ammo brands (i.e. Zombie) for my personal Carry weapon. Prosecutors have & will have a hayday with these. Modifying sights or optics are fine, but for me, the functioning of my EDC will be factory and I like many top brands of ammo, like Federal HST or Speer or anything else that law enforcement would use. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.
Letting the days go by, let the water hold me down. Letting the days go by, water flowing underground. Into the blue again after the money's gone. Once in a lifetime, water flowing underground.
Down and out in
Beverly Hills!
Glad to see I'm not the only one. Love the shirt 😊
I am assuming that if the weapon was solely designed for defense then there wouldn't be a problem. Carrying a 45-70 revolver would probably be frowned upon in court. Intentionally killing someone is called murder.
Unless government agents or police do it. Or the military. Basically, only if YOU do it.
Even if that 454 didn’t defeat body armor, you’re going to break ribs and probably stop the threat. LOL
What about hollow point ammo? My thought process is, increased stopping power with less recoil than larger calibers. Additionally, I don't want the round to go through them & strike an innocent person or property.
Agree to liability in civil cases related to the use of justified legal force. But if you dont think a prosecutor won't put your Desert Eagle on trial in court , you're kidding yourself....that said I still will carry my Colt 10mm Delta Gold Cup.if it suits me......
Right, I made my comment before I saw yours…
Yeah but the prosecutor is going to bring up the fact that you ate bacon that morning making you an infidel butcher.
Who carries a desert eagle for protection LMAO Foolish
I carry Smith Wesson 69 44 mag 2 3/4 barrel with 300 gr Hornady xtp
Dirty Harry,LMAO
I sometimes carry the same model in 4”. Pretty good carry piece.
It's not a liability until the jury thinks it is!
I'd be more worried about using a ar in self defense in blue states
Keep in mind prosecutors will make sure the jury is composed of 12 people who know nothing about Guns, so he can tell them whatever he wants, and they will believe him. Hollow point "cop killer" bullets, dangerous "hair triggers", "millitary grade" FMJ.... and a bunch of jurors who think a DA is more trustworthy than your attorney , and that DAs never lie, you know...
If the Government Has it, So should You!!!!......you ARE the Government (yeah right, I don't think so) ....🤣😂🤣😂...Knock Knock, ATF!!!...Come Out with Your Butt First!!!.....🤣😂🤣😂
Prosecutors do this all the time. Did you not watch the Kenosha kid trial? Logos on your slide and using a Desert Eagle will result in the prosecutor telling a jury you were looking to kill someone. I even had a prosecutor enter every copy of Guns & Ammo recovered from a house of a defendant. The defense lawyer can't "slap him down" if the judge lets it in.
.357 Magnum one shot stop
No such thing as 1 shot stop. I've seen people hit with both pistol rounds and shotgun rounds who had to be restrained on the gurney
@@jackbarrett7835....Shot placement as well as what you're shooting has a lot to do with a..."one shot stop". Just like you have seen people hit with both pistol & shotgun who still had to be retrained on the gurney, I've seen people hit and half their head was blown off or a large hole in their chest and they were dead with that one shot...
We know you meant to say 357 Sig
Better look at the numbers...357 Mag has over 92% one shot stops in documented actual shootings. Sig is good but .357 Mag is still better.
@@jackbarrett7835One shot stops happen all the time. Talk to a few military snipers for a better understanding.
I need some advice. I recently got my first pistol, and my wife seems uneasy with me carying it (extremely uneasy), i tried to sooth her by explaining how its not dangerous. What are some ways to get her use to it?
And no she does not rule the house, i just take her comfort into consideration, even if its incorrect.
Take her to the shooting range. My wife was always very nervous about me owning guns and after a few years of me owning them, I was able to get her to go to the range with me, and it changed her mind. Not about guns themselves, but about me handling guns. She saw how careful I was, so strict about gun safety I was that it eased her mind. It may work for you as well. Good luck.
I agree with the above comment, take her to the range. I guess I'm lucky because my current partners ex-husband was a cop at one time. So she never minded me having a gun. However, I took my daughter to the range, and she got herself a gun and a license. Then her husband got a gun and a license to carry. We have started taking the grandchildren to teach them how to shoot. When properly handled by properly trained people guns are not dangerous. The 13 year old granddaughter is actually going to take gun classes, besides the training I give.
Find a new wife.
Well said, Sir. Here's how I feel about it. If you are shooting someone in self-defense, that individual is trying to kill you. If someone is trying to kill you, do you really want to be armed with a North American Arms Mini-Revolver, or a .25 Automatic? I feel everyone should carry whatever handgun they shoot well. But that handgun has got to be powerful enough to stop the threat.
Well, I always go back to a couple of Charles Bronson movies for accurate reference.
LOL. Thanks for the laugh.
If you live in a blue state, all bets are off. No telling what those fools will think.
"Blue" county perhaps. And likely only then in a civil case.
Race warism moment. God help us.
Could potentially happen ‘most anywhere, especially if you’re a member of certain (proscribed) groups, e.g. disfigured and disabled.
Yeah, just because you see a werewolf taking advantage of an someone, that doesn't mean they aren't enjoying it and you shouldn't judge.
when it comes to defending the lives of your family, friends, community or yourself, there is no overkill.
A general rule I use as a guide is to carry the largest caliber I can gain a functional proficiency with. That caliber may be different for different folks. It also has to be convenient to carry. I've found what works for me. What works for you is fine. For you.
At one time in my life the only handgun I had was a Colt Anaconda 4” in .44 mag . I carried it concealed, loaded with . 44 Spl. for defense .
Definition of an expert. "Ex" is something that has been, and a "spurt" is a drip under pressure.
I am still laughing about your term, “ 45 AARP “ from yesterday!!
3:41 into the video I just have to say right quick as a carrier of single action revolvers I love that that's the first court example he gives
What about the type of ammo you choose? I’ve heard of attorneys using this to imply premeditation of wanting to kill. “Why did you put hydro shocks in your gun?”
An "expert", that you are describing, is truly a "drip" under pressure. It offends me when I, as a retired LEO, hear stupid information given as LAW when it is not law.
I love the T-shirt with Talking Heads lyrics! Great throwback to a cool band! I hope it's on your website because I'll absolutely order one! 👍
I think it all depends on where you live and what you’re doing. A 454 or 500 in downtown manhattan might be hard to defend vs bear country Wyoming.
Maybe not the weapon, but in some jurisdictions, the type of ammo amy be a concern. Some places you can not use hollow points. Just make sure and check in your area and avoid putting yourself in jeopardy.
If the evidence is in your favor, prosecutors will attack any factor whether it's caliber, ammo choice, sights or anything else they think they can use to sway a jury. For example, Kyle Rittenhouse was attacked for using fmj but would have been attacked just as hard for using hollow points. Having a good lawyer & knowing how to address smears like that can show a jury how desperate the prosecutor is to make his case & work in your favor if you know your equipment & can articulate a logical response to the smears.
Mr. Fish lost several years if his life being in prison over that "overreach". Before it was overturned.
would that logic also apply if lets say you have a sig 229 and you put in a short reset trigger ,asking for a friend ?
Having also seen a time when the cops would empty a.38 special or 9mm handgun in a violent pcp attacker and, still got attacked by the person.
I think a issue of more shots would be mora in question in court. Ie
6 rounds 44mag and then reload and shoot 3 more, in back. I haven't seen anything in any owners manual that says " this gun not for self defense carry". Great video
I just saw a video, where they also breached this same subject, and they pointed out that some judges take the caliber into account, starting with 40 Cal. The judges claimed that because the shooter picked that caliber, was looking for a fight.
I have experience as a Federal lawman, many friendships with regular police and training on using my sidearm in self defense.
Always, always, ALWAYS be able to explain what happened and why the badguy was shot.
Do NOT make up a story, as the investigative agency will also look at the physical evidence. (Distance, lighting, time of day, number of witnesses, penetration of bullet, and possibly Astrological sign.) (Okay, that last one was a gag, but emphasizing everything possible will be examined.)
I suggest also one avoid hazardous areas (bars come to mind) and conditions. Do not SEEK trouble. It just makes things more complicated.
Really enjoyed your rational discussion. Found it really interesting. Also really appreciated your t-shirt.
Thank god my 40mm noob tube comes in a carry size.
Washington has this. If you use certain rounds they consider it "excessive".
I heard DA's does exact same thing with ammo? make it seem like a person is getting the most Devastating ammo they can use in a defensive situation
The long and the short of the legal aspect is can you articulate why you carried what you carry. The cocking the hammer gets self defenders in trouble when it can be proved that led to a negligent discharge. Which negates a self defense claim. Look up LOSD Andrew Branca on the 5 aspects of a self defense case.
Yankee, Marshall, Greetings, sir. And a question:
I have heard some pistols especially the pistol rounds referred to “get off me” pistols. I understand that any use of a firearm is only legally, morally authorized when every lessor means have been exhausted or couldn’t be reasonably employed and in only situations when a life is in danger. Ie. The .22 short or the .25 Auto isn’t meant to physically prevent the perp from hurting you. Expected to at least to achieve a psychological stop. What is your opinion of those? Obviously if one shot does not stop the attack then two or 5 might? Thanks for regarding my question. -Bill
I carry a Dirty Harry Junior it's called a 357 Magnum. It walks the line to where it does just about everything😮
My carry used to be a Ruger Super Redhawk 44 Magnum.
True - If it's legal to carry, it's legal to carry.. . But I think the "what if's" of dealing with someone wearing body armor or stopping a car with a pistol (laughable that) are a bit far fetched & extreme. If we base every decision on the extremes what if's, then we're just admitting to living in fear. - IN which case we should all have a Barret 50 cal in the trunk alongside our own body armor. - 95% of people will never need to draw a weapon. (Doesn't mean we shouldn't carry one. But size is rarely the deciding factor. It's just another myth. 9mm, .380 and even 22lr have stopped more people than magnum he-man rounds)
May not always see eye to eye with you but this was a very good presentation!
I never thought of how smart you really are but that IOWA hat speaks volumes of smart. Yankee is just as smart as any smart person.
While I prefer the 357 mag. +6". For a personal carry it would be the 410 Derringer. The most likely reason to draw would be an emergency self defense. It would likely be close quarters. Fumbling with a big weapon would be your downfall.
I disagree. You really think carrying a 10mm doesn’t put more liability than a 9mm? A lot of factors play into why carrying a 10 is more risky than carrying a 9, 38 or even 45. Just my two cents, that’s all it’s worth.
I 2as told by a local cop that has been with the police department for over 20yrs. He said if you ever have to use your gun in self deffense to make sure you empty the gun. He said that is because someone that is realy in fear for thier life is not gona fire just 1 or 2 shots. A person that is realy scared will empty that gun before they realize it
I wonder if that is why most Cops do mag dumps?
I was taught in all 3 of my concealed carry courses over the span of 15 years to only stop shooting until there is no longer a threat. That could be 1 head shot or a full mag dump, a reload, and continued shots on 1 or more attackers. The advice from that cop sounds really dumb.
And why wouldn’t you stop shooting as soon as you were no longer in fear for your life?
It isn't an issue if you only keep a couple of calibers. None of them "criminal friendly"
In a sane world, I'd totally agree with you. Unfortunately, the victims are often made into criminals--charged, jailed, prosecuted, and convicted solely for defending themselves, not only in public but while in their OWN homes. It's sickening that one has to choose between dying or living with the high likelihood of facing jail time and financial ruin.
He has the story of the shooting wrong, so it is probably better that you don't agree with him.
Imagine that you are transporting a lifesaving organ to organ transplant surgery, would you shoot to prevent the theft of that organ?, It would all really depend on the race of everyone involved.
I agree with you in general, but I will say that in far left areas, just because there’s a president doesn’t mean that a jury or an appellate court will adhere to it.
Precedent?
Throw in the prosecutor also.
You don't live in NY. Mag capacity does matter. We can NOT exceed 10 rds (BS I Know) Oh and Body Armor is also Illegal in NY so bad guys don't ware it, right
I agree with you 100%
Desert Eagle in 50. I'm just worried about the three people it's going to go through. The most common gun people don't get too upset about is a blued .38 or 357 4" barrel like cops carried for years.
That is just my own opinion. Your mileage may vary 😂😅.
Legal advise is always helpful, and know YOUR state laws...planning ahead always before the SHI* hits the fan...
the law is one component. the other components are what the police think and how they will manipulate the evidence and narrative, what the prosecutor thinks and how he will manipulate the evidence and narrative, what the judge allows, how well your lawyer can manage the and present the evidence and narrative, and finally, what the jury believes in the end.
many of us have learned this with our own eyes/ears watching things like the Kyle Rittenhouse trial start to finish.
there are way too many ordinary / nondescript guns that are good enough for self defense and use by police and military. there is no good reason to carry an exotic self defense gun.
SW 500 or SW 460 SNUB NOSEs will 100 percent land you in jail no matter what! Yankee is 😮
Define exotic. Some Latin countries wont let citizens carry military grade ammo. ( 9mm, 45acp) so their limited option is 38 super
Funny how a large caliber hand gun might get you in trouble, but a 12 gauge shotgun is fine.🤨
One of your best videos ever. Thank you.
It's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. If you're alive, you can hire a lawyer.
One reason I carry a revolver is, because it's seen by police as a classy gun. It's pure self defense, that gangs, cartels, would never opt for. I've been pulled over and know of others who have; police are very conscious about what you carry.
None of their business.
@@TheObeyMayhem That's absolutely true, but I try to stay free from drama when it comes to police, because I don't feel I have the latitude to challenge them.
It was one aspect of carrying a revolver that gun tubers don't often consider.
The gun or ammo used can certainly have legal implications, if you live in a communist jurisdiction and the prosecutor has a hard-on for gun owners. Anywhere else, not so much.
It's been a long time since I've heard that expression (from my late father). I think you know the phrase I mean. 😂
As for prosecutor 'overreach', if it gets political like with the Rittenhouse trial and a prosecutor who thinks the average jury IQ is below 50, all bets are off, lol.
Well, that's a bit of a projection if you think Fox News is 'moderate; or something.
@@OllamhDrab I don't watch Fox.
You mean I should no longer carry my 308 pocket pistol?
You make A LOT OF SENSE YankeeMarshal. Thank you.
Great work as always! I had a question. What are your thought on the S&W 624 mountain revolver in 45 colt? maybe a comparison with 357/44 magnum. Thanks for all the work you do!
I carry 9mms with Seismic 185gr and buffalo bore 147gr + P hardcast Rounds..I'm good 👍
Digging the Talking Heads T shirt.
I no longer go to McDonald’s. Especially because I carry! My patience has run its coarse with its employees!
Errr…Marshall, I don’t believe that Harold Fish had any previous encounters with Mr. Kuenzli. The judge excluded evidence of Mr. Kuenzli’s previous erratic and violent behavior with others in the past. Mr. Fish was a 57 year old retired school teacher doing a solo hike in a National Forest in Arizona. He was armed with a 10mm because we have some big cats wandering about this state. Mr. Kuenzli’s dogs ran towards him barking, he fired a shot into the ground which scared the dogs off, without hurting them.
Kuenzli then ran at him yelling that he would kill him. That is when he fired. He also called for emergency aid and provided aid until the medics could arrive. He COULD HAVE just shot him and left, and no one would ever have known. The 10mm came up, I’m told, in the prosecutor’s summation to the jury when he told them that the 10mm was SO POWERFUL that anyone who carried one wanted to kill someone. They were ignorant of the truth.
Excellent advice
Ive heard stories of DAs seeking pre meditated murder charges based on the Ammo used but never the gun itself. Not sure any of it is legit