I picked up the 38V first and was shocked how much it changed how the system felt compared to the 45P and 80 1.9, mainly due to the autofocus speed, surefootedness and sound. It actually feels like a camera system made this century. Getting the 55V wasn't something I planned on, but I liked the 38 so much that I snagged a 55 when they got restocked at B&H.
Those lens are a design delight. The little H logos that also add grip texture. The focus clutch with hyperfocal distance markers. Truly commendable what those Swedes are doing here.
I own the X2D and my workaround has been to use H series lenses I used with my H1 body. I have the HC 35mm, 80mm, 100mm, 50-110mm adapted with the XH CONVERTER 0,8. They still work brilliantly albeit manual focus only, the 100mm followed closely with the 80mm makes the most beautiful portraits with the "creamiest" bokeh I have seen. Not many people use that combo so it doesn't get much exposure on the socials. Best $700 I spent on an adapter for a camera.
@@benjhaisch yeah just be aware that the 100mm AF mechanism fails, which is not a problem considering that you won’t be able to any ways. Focus peaking with the orange color gives the best success rate for me. Also look out for the adapter on BH used. They get a little cumbersome but once you see the results it fantastic. The adapter essentially turns the 100mm into f1.8 and the 80mm into an f2.2 in case you already didn’t know.
I’m using this lens together with its 90mm sibling in the studio for fashion and beauty shoots. Never had an issue with AF. The IQ is insanely good. Gorgeous system. I wasn’t too impressed with the original X1D, but these new cameras and the new lenses are fantastic. When looking at the price, also take into account that every lens comes with a leaf shutter and it syncs up to 1/2000th. I think the 90mm can even sync up to 1/4000th…
1:42 Bravo Benj! For those of us who shot true medium format for years, this truly is APS-M. Great to see the flying V logo, paying homage to Victor. Before the 645 H System was invented, their cameras were simply known as the 500 Series.
I love the 55V. Just received the 38V today. Will order the 90V once they become available. The 55V lenses complement the X system in a way the previous XCD lenses just didn't. I also have the 907X 50C and the design cues throughout the system are seamless. It's a joy to use.
Great review! I bought the 38 as my first lens for the 907X CFV100C and I’ve been blown away by the images from that combo. Just amazing. I’ve been impatiently waiting for the 90 which seems impossible to obtain….. so, just bought the 55. Can’t wait!!! Your review was very helpful.
Face detection is only available on 100C? Is it available on 50C or subject to the lens? I previously owned 50C and XCD 80 1.9, it doesn’t have this feature
The sound you are hearing from the lens is not the Leaf Shutter, it's the Autofocus, I have the 20-35 and it makes this sounds as well, but when I switch to MF it's gone.
It’s the shutter… I can even feel it opening and closing in the lens when I take a photo. Your 20-35 might have significantly more glass inside so it’s dampened more, but the sound isn’t the AF at least in my lenses (28/38/55/90)
@@benjhaisch 6:09 where you show the Sounds, my 20-35 sounds exactly like this as long as I use AF, as soon as I switch to MF, it's silent and you just hear the click of the leaf shutter and no skweaking anymore.
Ah my apologies, yeah I missed adding the shutter click for some reason. In other videos I only added it. That “fax machine” sound is 100% the autofocus
Love the channel as it’s my go to source for anything Hasselblad! I have the X2D and absolutely love it. I have the 135mm with 1.7 TC and probably will never sell that lens. I just however sold my 45p because I was getting a bit bored with the focal length. I’m considering picking up the 28p… but I also want a mid range too. If I can find a 55v would you go for it OVER the older 65mm 2.8 for that range? I’m guessing the V has much better focusing motors in it and probably a little better in optical performance … hard thing is finding theses new lenses. Ideally I’d LOVE the 28p and 55v but I’d be happy with the 65mm I think as it’s also less $$ on the used market.
@@benjhaisch ouch. My friend managed to get me from Japan. Haven’t tested it on my 100s. Was a gonna buy the Hassy 907x and 55 combo like a month ago. But the one stock the store here in SG had was spoilt after we unsealed it to test. The LCD was dead. Lol. That made me go on a GFX lens rampage with the 80 1.7 and then the 55 1.7 😂.
I agree with all your points on the XCD 55V. We can hardly think of the X2D as a "walk around " camera but with the XCD 55V it is a walk around camera. It does great detail without being harsh, a miracle. I have portraits that have sharp eyelashes and detailed skin but not harsh skin. It has to be magic. Color, definition and IQ are the best I have seen. Zooming in on a distant pine tree reveals needles as sharp as can be. The camera lens combo is quite expensive and worth it. You hi the high points well. And BTW, those old retro Sonnars cover the X2D sensor, ;o)
Both are great for sure. I wasn’t able to do a direct 1:1 comparison though so it’d be hard to really give any definitive answer there. I wouldn’t be worried about IQ at all on either though for my use cases.
Really nice combo and review. Would love to use this system on my v-series cameras. How is the 80 2.8 performing in this „frankenstein-system“? Are you doing/einjoying this mix-system? 😅 thank you in regard for sharing your experiences!!!
Have 55v and xcd 65 and the last one is way superb in image quality than 55v, but if we are talking about weight, size and a quiet focus, yes 55 is the best option.
@@benjhaisch Optically, the 65 is hard to beat. Think of it as being like a 50mm APO Summicron. You can easily use it for all type of work, especially landscape. I am surprised by the MTF curves on paper of the 55V when compared with those of the 65. V lenses are not as sharp as most of the older lenses, the sharpness falloff of the 65mm is much smoother and therefore more pleasing if shoot wide open (the sharpness falloff, off the 55V is somehow rough, noticeable different to the older XCD lenses) Other than that both lenses are great.
I have the 55V on my X2D and it could be your only lens, quite frankly. It really is extremely good. I feel I should have at least one more option but am totally stuck choosing between the 25V and the 90V. At the moment I am erring to the 25V as I really enjoy the X-Pan format and it works very well for that I think. Yet the 90 would be a great lens to isolate landscape elements or people.
This is the setup I'm looking at after spending weeks looking at Fuji 100s and the 907X 50C. Now I just need to figure out how to pay for it, maybe Hasselblad will trade me for my Canon RF 600 F4.
If you don’t wanna drop that cash, i just got the older version 65mm 2.8 on eBay for 1700 Mint condition 1600 shots. Used high end glass is always cheaper and still Very good. Granted the size, weight and tech difference.
looking at MTF it seems everything else but very sharp at f2.5. Am I too critical? Of course it is impossible to check this on your youtube video. You might argue sharpness is not everything, but then again if shar-ness is not everything why get a 100MP camera?
I've shot a lot of portraits with it. The 55V on the X2D is almost TOO sharp. I shot with the XCD 65 as well, and wouldn't pick it over the 55V overall. MTF charts don't always tell the whole story.
Hasselblad's new 55mm f/2.5 to the Zeiss 80mm f/2.8 is not a good comparison. The Zeiss 80mm was made for 6x6 film, giving a 44mm f/1.5 full-frame equivalent look. The new Hasselblad 55mm f/2.5? It gets you a 43mm f/1.9 full-frame look. If you want something closer to the Zeiss 80mm’s look, go with Fuji’s GFX 55mm f/1.7, which gives a 43mm f/1.3 full-frame look. Want to save even more money? Go APS-C. Fuji, Nikon, or Sony paired with a Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 (41mm f/1.8 full-frame equivalent) is closer to the Hasselblad 55mm f/2.5 than you'd think. Here’s the part RUclipsrs won’t tell you. For example, you could buy an old Canon DSLR 5DS or 5DR and pair it with the old EF 50mm f/1.2 or EF 85mm f/1.2, crop to 4:3 in post, and blow modern medium-format cameras out of the water. It’s not about chasing the newest gear-it’s about knowing how to compose, crop, and use what you have wisely. Now, about color science-while some people swear by it, it can easily be adjusted in software like Lightroom, Capture One, or Cobalt. Camera companies know this but still hype it up to keep us hooked. Don’t let marketing gimmicks dictate your creativity or drain your wallet. Think critically, shoot smart, and save your hard-earned money. I hope to be the voice of reason for some of y'all falling down the rabbit hole like I have for many years. Happy Holidays to all. 🙏🏽
@@benjhaisch early in the video you mentioned “the APS of medium format” or something along those lines.. I forget the exact words you used.. but people I think already get easily confused about APSC and super 35, 35mm, full frame.. let alone using APS in a relative comparison to a “large format” or “medium format” size - That’s all I was saying 🙏
I picked up the 38V first and was shocked how much it changed how the system felt compared to the 45P and 80 1.9, mainly due to the autofocus speed, surefootedness and sound. It actually feels like a camera system made this century. Getting the 55V wasn't something I planned on, but I liked the 38 so much that I snagged a 55 when they got restocked at B&H.
What body are you using?
Those lens are a design delight. The little H logos that also add grip texture. The focus clutch with hyperfocal distance markers. Truly commendable what those Swedes are doing here.
I own the X2D and my workaround has been to use H series lenses I used with my H1 body. I have the HC 35mm, 80mm, 100mm, 50-110mm adapted with the XH CONVERTER 0,8. They still work brilliantly albeit manual focus only, the 100mm followed closely with the 80mm makes the most beautiful portraits with the "creamiest" bokeh I have seen. Not many people use that combo so it doesn't get much exposure on the socials. Best $700 I spent on an adapter for a camera.
I’ve been really considering grabbing a 100mm and that XH converter!
@@benjhaisch yeah just be aware that the 100mm AF mechanism fails, which is not a problem considering that you won’t be able to any ways. Focus peaking with the orange color gives the best success rate for me. Also look out for the adapter on BH used. They get a little cumbersome but once you see the results it fantastic. The adapter essentially turns the 100mm into f1.8 and the 80mm into an f2.2 in case you already didn’t know.
I’m using this lens together with its 90mm sibling in the studio for fashion and beauty shoots. Never had an issue with AF. The IQ is insanely good. Gorgeous system. I wasn’t too impressed with the original X1D, but these new cameras and the new lenses are fantastic. When looking at the price, also take into account that every lens comes with a leaf shutter and it syncs up to 1/2000th. I think the 90mm can even sync up to 1/4000th…
907X is such a great looking camera of itself and the photos it takes.
1:42 Bravo Benj! For those of us who shot true medium format for years, this truly is APS-M. Great to see the flying V logo, paying homage to Victor. Before the 645 H System was invented, their cameras were simply known as the 500 Series.
Sorry for the dumb question: what strap is that on the Hasselblad digital camera?
I love the 55V. Just received the 38V today. Will order the 90V once they become available. The 55V lenses complement the X system in a way the previous XCD lenses just didn't. I also have the 907X 50C and the design cues throughout the system are seamless. It's a joy to use.
Great review! I bought the 38 as my first lens for the 907X CFV100C and I’ve been blown away by the images from that combo. Just amazing. I’ve been impatiently waiting for the 90 which seems impossible to obtain….. so, just bought the 55. Can’t wait!!! Your review was very helpful.
Face detection is only available on 100C? Is it available on 50C or subject to the lens?
I previously owned 50C and XCD 80 1.9, it doesn’t have this feature
I believe it’s only with that sensor, yes.
The sound you are hearing from the lens is not the Leaf Shutter, it's the Autofocus, I have the 20-35 and it makes this sounds as well, but when I switch to MF it's gone.
It’s the shutter… I can even feel it opening and closing in the lens when I take a photo. Your 20-35 might have significantly more glass inside so it’s dampened more, but the sound isn’t the AF at least in my lenses (28/38/55/90)
@ do you really mean the shutter? Maybe its the aperture moving? But I have the same sounds as I hear in your video but when I switch to mf it’s gone.
@DAVISION-YT which part of the video are you talking about? It’s been almost a year since I made this video ;)
@@benjhaisch 6:09 where you show the Sounds, my 20-35 sounds exactly like this as long as I use AF, as soon as I switch to MF, it's silent and you just hear the click of the leaf shutter and no skweaking anymore.
Ah my apologies, yeah I missed adding the shutter click for some reason. In other videos I only added it. That “fax machine” sound is 100% the autofocus
Love the channel as it’s my go to source for anything Hasselblad! I have the X2D and absolutely love it. I have the 135mm with 1.7 TC and probably will never sell that lens. I just however sold my 45p because I was getting a bit bored with the focal length. I’m considering picking up the 28p… but I also want a mid range too. If I can find a 55v would you go for it OVER the older 65mm 2.8 for that range? I’m guessing the V has much better focusing motors in it and probably a little better in optical performance … hard thing is finding theses new lenses. Ideally I’d LOVE the 28p and 55v but I’d be happy with the 65mm I think as it’s also less $$ on the used market.
Not sure if I remember it correctly , but didn’t test rhe 55 1.7 on the 50s instead of the new GfX100ii ?
I tested it on the 100II
@@benjhaisch ouch. My friend managed to get me from Japan. Haven’t tested it on my 100s.
Was a gonna buy the Hassy 907x and 55 combo like a month ago. But the one stock the store here in SG had was spoilt after we unsealed it to test. The LCD was dead. Lol.
That made me go on a GFX lens rampage with the 80 1.7 and then the 55 1.7 😂.
I agree with all your points on the XCD 55V. We can hardly think of the X2D as a "walk around " camera but with the XCD 55V it is a walk around camera. It does great detail without being harsh, a miracle. I have portraits that have sharp eyelashes and detailed skin but not harsh skin. It has to be magic. Color, definition and IQ are the best I have seen. Zooming in on a distant pine tree reveals needles as sharp as can be. The camera lens combo is quite expensive and worth it. You hi the high points well.
And BTW, those old retro Sonnars cover the X2D sensor, ;o)
Great video! Regarding image quality, are they really different and which one do you prefer, the Fujinon GF55mm f1.7 or this Hassy XCD55mm f2.5V? Thx!
Both are great for sure. I wasn’t able to do a direct 1:1 comparison though so it’d be hard to really give any definitive answer there. I wouldn’t be worried about IQ at all on either though for my use cases.
Really nice combo and review. Would love to use this system on my v-series cameras. How is the 80 2.8 performing in this „frankenstein-system“? Are you doing/einjoying this mix-system? 😅 thank you in regard for sharing your experiences!!!
Are apetures on large format cameras differnt than on full frame? Likew, is 2.8 something like 2 on full frame?
Apertures are still the same but the apparent DOV in comparison to 35mm does appear to be more shallow on larger sensors, yes.
@@benjhaisch Thx!
Have 55v and xcd 65 and the last one is way superb in image quality than 55v, but if we are talking about weight, size and a quiet focus, yes 55 is the best option.
Innnnnteresting. In what way is the 65 superior?
@@benjhaisch Optically, the 65 is hard to beat. Think of it as being like a 50mm APO Summicron. You can easily use it for all type of work, especially landscape. I am surprised by the MTF curves on paper of the 55V when compared with those of the 65. V lenses are not as sharp as most of the older lenses, the sharpness falloff of the 65mm is much smoother and therefore more pleasing if shoot wide open (the sharpness falloff, off the 55V is somehow rough, noticeable different to the older XCD lenses) Other than that both lenses are great.
I have the 55V on my X2D and it could be your only lens, quite frankly. It really is extremely good.
I feel I should have at least one more option but am totally stuck choosing between the 25V and the 90V. At the moment I am erring to the 25V as I really enjoy the X-Pan format and it works very well for that I think. Yet the 90 would be a great lens to isolate landscape elements or people.
This is the setup I'm looking at after spending weeks looking at Fuji 100s and the 907X 50C. Now I just need to figure out how to pay for it, maybe Hasselblad will trade me for my Canon RF 600 F4.
What up Benj your videos are so damn good!
can you do a video review on the 28mm?
I have one in the works
If you don’t wanna drop that cash, i just got the older version 65mm 2.8 on eBay for 1700 Mint condition 1600 shots. Used high end glass is always cheaper and still Very good.
Granted the size, weight and tech difference.
Imagine they called those sensors macro four-thirds ;-)
hahahahahaha
looking at MTF it seems everything else but very sharp at f2.5. Am I too critical? Of course it is impossible to check this on your youtube video. You might argue sharpness is not everything, but then again if shar-ness is not everything why get a 100MP camera?
It’s still incredibly sharp at 2.5 even at 100mp in my experience.
I've shot a lot of portraits with it. The 55V on the X2D is almost TOO sharp. I shot with the XCD 65 as well, and wouldn't pick it over the 55V overall. MTF charts don't always tell the whole story.
Hasselblad's new 55mm f/2.5 to the Zeiss 80mm f/2.8 is not a good comparison. The Zeiss 80mm was made for 6x6 film, giving a 44mm f/1.5 full-frame equivalent look. The new Hasselblad 55mm f/2.5? It gets you a 43mm f/1.9 full-frame look. If you want something closer to the Zeiss 80mm’s look, go with Fuji’s GFX 55mm f/1.7, which gives a 43mm f/1.3 full-frame look.
Want to save even more money? Go APS-C. Fuji, Nikon, or Sony paired with a Viltrox 27mm f/1.2 (41mm f/1.8 full-frame equivalent) is closer to the Hasselblad 55mm f/2.5 than you'd think.
Here’s the part RUclipsrs won’t tell you. For example, you could buy an old Canon DSLR 5DS or 5DR and pair it with the old EF 50mm f/1.2 or EF 85mm f/1.2, crop to 4:3 in post, and blow modern medium-format cameras out of the water. It’s not about chasing the newest gear-it’s about knowing how to compose, crop, and use what you have wisely.
Now, about color science-while some people swear by it, it can easily be adjusted in software like Lightroom, Capture One, or Cobalt. Camera companies know this but still hype it up to keep us hooked. Don’t let marketing gimmicks dictate your creativity or drain your wallet. Think critically, shoot smart, and save your hard-earned money. I hope to be the voice of reason for some of y'all falling down the rabbit hole like I have for many years. Happy Holidays to all. 🙏🏽
I have the 38mm v on my X2D and it’s fantastic. The detail blows my mind every time I look at my images.
Abdiel Stravenue
Katelynn Lights
Using APS term could confuse many novice / people learning about terminology and sensor/film sizes.. Cheers
I’m not sure what you’re getting at? Can you elaborate?
@@benjhaisch early in the video you mentioned “the APS of medium format” or something along those lines.. I forget the exact words you used.. but people I think already get easily confused about APSC and super 35, 35mm, full frame.. let alone using APS in a relative comparison to a “large format” or “medium format” size - That’s all I was saying 🙏
@TylerMcCool haha gotcha :)
Benj makes flare a countable noun and as an english teacher im not triggered lol
Hahahaha
Agree but super expensive too that lens 😅
if it was more affordable I'd own one already, but it's definitely something I'm willing to save for.
Likewise 🙌👍🏻
Sounds like a fax machine 😮 How many people don’t even know what that is?? 😂