A Look At The Meike 6-11mm Fisheye Zoom

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 дек 2018
  • No-one could accuse the Meike 6-11mm Fisheye Zoom of being conventional, either in function or looks. A focus ring that reads Near~Far rather distances, anyone?
    It's a specialized lens as are all extreme focal length Micro Four Thirds lenses, whether 6mm or 300mm. Could you find a use for it?
    ----------
    Help keep my channel going - Buy though my Amazon shop at
    www.amazon.co.uk/shop/davidth...
    In association with ePHOTOzine - www.ephotozine.com
    Sound post production by Charles Walkowski at www.walkowski.co.uk
    See my M43 blog at m43blog.dthorpe.net/
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 49

  • @studioviper3016
    @studioviper3016 5 лет назад +4

    David - your videos are always a must-see - it's criminal that you don't have 100k subs!

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      Thanks - I'm probably working in too specialist an area for 100k but it'd be nice.

  • @WhiteThunder121
    @WhiteThunder121 5 лет назад +12

    "For people who like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing they will like"
    LOL

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +3

      :-)

    • @triplestrafe
      @triplestrafe 5 лет назад +2

      @@DavidThorpeMFT That remark made my brain zoom in and out and in

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +3

      A zooming brain sounds nice. Does it trombone or is it internal zooming :-)

    • @triplestrafe
      @triplestrafe 5 лет назад +1

      @@DavidThorpeMFT I heard it works even better with a cold

  • @guyjordan8201
    @guyjordan8201 5 лет назад +5

    For people who like David Thorpe, this is the sort of David Thorpe they will like.

  • @michaelhawkins1173
    @michaelhawkins1173 5 лет назад +1

    The best pre Christmas present yet. Thank you David.

  • @MrSonicAdvance
    @MrSonicAdvance 5 лет назад +2

    If I hadn't already got the Panasonic 7-14mm F4, I'd be ordering one of these right now. I LOVE ultra-wide lenses!

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +2

      Now there's a man who knows his own mind - I knew this would really appeal to some photographers!

  • @michaelhawkins1173
    @michaelhawkins1173 5 лет назад +1

    I am gambling this is the final of 2018 but if Kempton is anything to go by, an Olympian ring at your door delivering the latest and may be greatest M4/3 offering yet for 2019 is with you. If not thank you for all your videos and long may they continue. Happy new year.

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +2

      Happy New Year, Michael! I don't know anything about an Olympian offering but we shall see!

  • @fredio54
    @fredio54 3 года назад +1

    I didn't know he was a mad magazine fan! I have over 100 mad mags and books. Too late to discuss now, though. :-(

  • @Mrcherrardcohen
    @Mrcherrardcohen 5 лет назад +1

    Another good video. I like the Meike lenses.

  • @edsassler285
    @edsassler285 5 лет назад +1

    I just tested this lens, it's really odd. I came away with the feeling that Olympus or Panasonic would never release something like this because of all of it's quirks, yet I find I like it. The hood gets into the image for a third of it's zoom range, and the focus only says near-far because it changes drastically with focal length. That said, I found this lens has some wonderful abilities that others don't. Close focusing at 6mm is really, really close, as in less than 1cm from the subject. Add to that the depth of field at f8 and it becomes an almost macro lens with the flat field of a funhouse mirror.
    One of the things I love about your reviews is that they often come back to the size of the camera outfit, and the idea of the perfect kit. I often travel with the Meike 6.5mm circular fisheye and the Rokinon 7.5mm fisheye, and sometimes the Rokinon 8mm fisheye, which is massive. I was looking for one lens to replace all my other fisheye lenses, and after using it for two weeks, I'm still not sure if this does the job...
    My conclusion on this lens (along with the Meike 85mm macro) is that it doesn't fit with the Micro Four Thirds system because they're just too heavy compared to other lenses that do the same thing. I can't see riding my bike somewhere with that lens on my back, but I could see going to the botanical gardens with both of those lenses and a really sturdy (heavy) tripod.
    As always, thanks for the review. Your style is a welcome change in a world of in-your-face you RUclipsrs.

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      Thanks Ed ! Odd, absolutely but it will fill the bill for some. Your conclusions sum up the conundrum with lenses of this type. Overall, I like Meike because they give us more choices, as you say ones that Olympus and Panasonic would never do. And if anyone doesn't like them, they don't need to buy one.

  • @jimebbage
    @jimebbage 5 лет назад +1

    Your wonderfully laconic drift took me wandering, again...into The 360^ Mirror World of the Amazing Jan Van Eyck oil on Oak..picture of Giovanni Arnolfini & his Missus..c. 1434....And I thought would our Jean Van E..have done with a Fisheye lensed camera..? But goodness, just look what he did with his bare hands..Arnolfini picture is in our National Gallery..Free to view..worth the Trip ! As is Velasquez’ pix..he’s my real hero..Same gallery.
    Brilliant how your vids provoke. Thank you very much.
    I follow a Stanley Unwinesque boffin, an Engineering Genius here on RUclips, called AvE..Who mesmerises, as you do..Just talking about simple but complex issues..Cheers !

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад

      Thanks so much, Verdi! I must take a look at Ave.

  • @QuickQuips
    @QuickQuips 5 лет назад +2

    Pretty interesting but mad lens. It's heavy negating a major benefit of m43 yet is versatile for people who love it.

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      Yes, not a carry everywhere lens! Quite specialist, as you say.

  • @BobDiaz123
    @BobDiaz123 5 лет назад +1

    Interesting, what does it cost?

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      It wasn't priced when I got mine - it's about £229 on Amazon amzn.to/2Sd7Aan

  • @bjnslc
    @bjnslc 5 лет назад +1

    How can you really have 180 degree angle circular view with a hood?

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      You can't! I didn't even try.

    • @bjnslc
      @bjnslc 5 лет назад +1

      I didn't know the hood was removable. Glad to see it is. A very odd lens.

  • @titomiguelmarques5512
    @titomiguelmarques5512 5 лет назад +2

    Its size makes it unsuited for mft. Too bad, because the focal range is interesting. The meike 6mm for circular fisheye and the samyang 7,5mm for diagonal fisheye remain better choices.

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      Given the size, you'd want to know that you were going to use it before putting it in the camera bag.

  • @LarsKiel
    @LarsKiel 5 лет назад

    👍😃

  • @qt31415
    @qt31415 5 лет назад +1

    I though the railings on 2:38 were bent by the lens.. >_< ) but as always your reviews are pleasing..

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад

      I didn't spot that - too familiar with the location!

  • @przybylskipawel
    @przybylskipawel 3 года назад

    Do you have it for sale?

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  3 года назад

      Afraid not, Pawel.

    • @przybylskipawel
      @przybylskipawel 3 года назад

      @@DavidThorpeMFT Nevermind. I tested it and returned. It squeezes image on edges too much. I recently found out that the only fisheye lenses that are usable for me are Samyang's stereographic 2.8 fisheyes. I gave generic 7.5mm 2.8 APS-C model with MFT mount and it must be enough.

  • @mromagnoli
    @mromagnoli 4 года назад

    So it's not really a MFT lens....it's an ASP-C lens with a MFT mount....

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  4 года назад +1

      That's right. It's not ideal but it's better to have it for Micro Four Thirds than not.

  • @MichaelGerrard
    @MichaelGerrard 5 лет назад +1

    That is an odd one!

  • @NoMoreForeignWars
    @NoMoreForeignWars 5 лет назад +2

    Just buy a 6.5mm and crop as needed

  • @mromagnoli
    @mromagnoli 5 лет назад

    The cutting off at the top and bottom of the fisheye is still a deal breaker for me. I'd rather pay more and be happy with my photos.

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  5 лет назад +1

      Perfectly understandable - but the Meike is still nice for those photographers who don't have or don't want to spend the money for an uncropped fisheye.

  • @gerardg1950
    @gerardg1950 5 лет назад +1

    A short video!

  • @adelmurza777
    @adelmurza777 3 года назад

    I try to use it with sony a7lll, it was bad experiment. I don’t know , who like this lens? It’s bull shit👹

    • @DavidThorpeMFT
      @DavidThorpeMFT  3 года назад +2

      My channel is for Micro Four Thirds only.