@@scottyskywalker5768 Brightburn* right? (just checking, it's possible it was called something else in other countries!) And yeah evil Superman is the laziest thing.
2013 ruling: Times-in short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. He’ll continue to leap tall buildings into the future, and they’ll continue to make money from him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
They tried suing on Man of Steel (2013) and lost.[The Times]-In short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
This doesn’t make any sense, Joe Shuster sold his rights to the character in 1938. So he’s never really had rights to Superman. Why does his family keep trying to sue people?
I remember the creator of the witcher selling video game rights he found out how much money it made and sued. Poland sided with him but this ain't Poland.
@johnlawful2272 I remember that Andre Sabkowski sold the videogame rights to CDPR for a one-time payout. They offered him royalties based on sales bit he didn't think the games would be popular.
They tried suing on Man of Steel (2013) and lost.[The Times]-In short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
2013 man of steel litigation > The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
Facts!! We have already seen derivatives of public domain characters in Winnie the Pooh and I believe Micky Mouse is already legitimized as public domain.
SO to explain "“Shuster died in 1992 and Siegel in 1996. By operation of law, Shuster’s foreign copyrights automatically reverted to his estate in 2017 in most of these territories (and in 2021 in Canada). Yet Defendants continue to exploit Superman across these jurisdictions without the Shuster Estate’s authorization-including in motion pictures, television series, and merchandise-in direct contravention of these countries’ copyright laws, which require the consent of all joint copyright owners to do so.”" Let just say Crossed eye superman is now the least of their worries.
The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
This isn't new, they did the same thing to Henry Cavills Superman movie too. Crazy thing is, the estate WANTS the movies to still come out and do well. Means more money for them. Just a part of the game
If it isn't me, don't watch it. I played Paul Atreides, Superman AND Willy Wonka with no recognition, no paycheck and no respect from anyone involved in those projects. Including the actors and actresses.
@KryptonManOfTomorrow It may have some significance now because a lot of people don't want what James Gunn is doing plus WB doesn't have money right now.
Man of steel 2013 litigation too-The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
People, pay attention to the details. The copyright for Superman in British Crown countries reverted to the estate 25 years after Schusters death. He died in '96. So Earlier films didn't violate this. Only films/depictions after 2021. WBD will settle it and move forward. More bad P.R. for WBD. Just what they need after that tv spot fiasco. But they will figure it out. It is funny though. After they screwed Cavill and moved to this unwanted, unneeded reboot with a bad suit and a cheap look.
@@Zion.4they butchered the character way before Gunn came in 🤣, this lawsuit is definitely an omen it happened with man of steel and that movie sucked and now it’s happening again which means it may actually be trash
Your bias clouds common sense. - Times-in short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. He’ll continue to leap tall buildings into the future, and they’ll continue to make money from him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
![Batman sends Lex Luthor in Arkham Asylum | Batman v Superman [Extended cut]](/img/1.gif)
DC: "We own Superman!"
The Estate: "well... actually..." 😂😂😂
😂
The character goes public domain soon. Wait till the horror movies start😂😂😂
We already got brightening, and the boys im fed up with evil murderer Superman .
@@scottyskywalker5768 Brightburn* right? (just checking, it's possible it was called something else in other countries!) And yeah evil Superman is the laziest thing.
Comment of the day my guy🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
James gunn should produce more of brightburn and it's universe.
Nah Sony will start using him
They're all these superheroes are owned by the families of the creators that's what they mean by the estate
The creators families have always felt robbed by the studio. They’ve wanted those rights back for a long time. One of many court battles
They should have sued them because they tried to make Superman gay!😬😤
They did this with Man of Steel 😂. I guess they want to take another L 😂
He already lost an appeals court appeal in 2013 - sounds like it won't go anywhere.
They tried it on man of steel and lost too
2013 ruling: Times-in short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. He’ll continue to leap tall buildings into the future, and they’ll continue to make money from him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
They get sued every time there’s a Superman movie. The creators (and their families after they passed) has been doing this since the 50s.
You know this happened in 2013 aswell during man of steel
The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
Yeah but it’s a lot funnier to believe that the trailer was so bad that they decided to do this instead 😂
@ so bad? It made it into top 5 most viewed trailers of all time.
@@jamesdi-michele7620 dude joker 2 was one of the most viewed videos as well 😂😂
Manufacturing views is pretty easy
@@jamesdi-michele7620just because something gets a lot of views doesn't mean the people who watched it liked what they saw.
Happens every time a new Superman movie comes out..
THIS IS NOTHING NEW ! THE ESTATE IS TRYING TO MAKE MONEY. THIS WILL ALL BE IRONED OUT LIKE IT WAS BEFORE.
They tried suing on Man of Steel (2013) and lost.[The Times]-In short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
This doesn’t make any sense, Joe Shuster sold his rights to the character in 1938. So he’s never really had rights to Superman. Why does his family keep trying to sue people?
I remember the creator of the witcher selling video game rights he found out how much money it made and sued. Poland sided with him but this ain't Poland.
@johnlawful2272 I remember that Andre Sabkowski sold the videogame rights to CDPR for a one-time payout. They offered him royalties based on sales bit he didn't think the games would be popular.
DC:How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?!...
Superman estate:If you get knock down once....Try!!Try again!!!
They're the real heroes here 😂
They tried suing on Man of Steel (2013) and lost.[The Times]-In short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
That was back then. This is now. Laws change over time, so this may not end the same way.
I thought you were going to say the estate was suing WB for creating such a crappy costume.
Wow, this is just what I needed. Amazing video!
You needed this? What's your angle?
Bot account.
Superman is almost public domain. Just stall them out in court.
2013 man of steel litigation > The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
Facts!! We have already seen derivatives of public domain characters in Winnie the Pooh and I believe Micky Mouse is already legitimized as public domain.
Bro that’s like over 10 years from now. They ain’t ganna happen.
Man OF sTEEL WAS 2013, The rights reverted back to the Shuster estate in 2021, Right Now It is banned in England, Irland, Canada and Australia
The Superman curse is here
Why would they wait 7 years to sue them? 🤔
Someone wants 💰from WB
What? They don't like the suit either?
SO to explain "“Shuster died in 1992 and Siegel in 1996. By operation of law, Shuster’s foreign copyrights automatically reverted to his estate in 2017 in most of these territories (and in 2021 in Canada). Yet Defendants continue to exploit Superman across these jurisdictions without the Shuster Estate’s authorization-including in motion pictures, television series, and merchandise-in direct contravention of these countries’ copyright laws, which require the consent of all joint copyright owners to do so.”" Let just say Crossed eye superman is now the least of their worries.
Who knew Kara Zor-El would jump in to demand a fair share for the use of likenesses of Jor-El and Kal-El?
Superman is cursed 😂
@@MarioOrion-fd4sx Superman always been cursed this lawsuit nothing new
this lawsuit happened back when man of steel and when superman returns released, it's nothing more than a cash grab
The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
The Estate should've sued in the 90s to get that Nicolas Cage Superman Film done.
This isn't new, they did the same thing to Henry Cavills Superman movie too. Crazy thing is, the estate WANTS the movies to still come out and do well. Means more money for them. Just a part of the game
I thought both creators kids have cameos? If that’s so, looks like someone is getting cut 😂
If it isn't me, don't watch it.
I played Paul Atreides, Superman AND Willy Wonka with no recognition, no paycheck and no respect from anyone involved in those projects. Including the actors and actresses.
Bring back Superman and Lois….
You didn’t make the joke so I’ll say it... “They sued cause the suits a big ol’ piece a tresh 🗑️” 😂
😂
Sueperman!
😂😂😂
mehhh, just get Bruce Wayne to buy the law firm that filed the lawsuit. He already bought the bank that foreclosured the Kent's house/property.
This is going to be the families of the creators
This is WB karma. Don’t support the greedy, arrogant, corrupted & inhuman film studio
@@logannelson1807 all Film studios greedy corrupt
Soooo! How bout all the recent Superman cartoons? Do they sue that?
I came here just for the outro 😅
he just wants more money lmao
Okay now I feel sorry for Superman fans now
This wasn’t a problem with the last movies.
Tells us everything we need to know. This 🗑️ film shouldn't exist.
it was, the estate tried suing back when man of steel released and when superman returns released. It's a cash grab lawsuit that they have lost twice
This actually happened in 2013 with man of steel. Google it
@@Kal-ElofKryptonliterally happen in 2013 with man of steel dumbass
@KryptonManOfTomorrow It may have some significance now because a lot of people don't want what James Gunn is doing plus WB doesn't have money right now.
The character doesn’t deserve this…
If it was zack u would worry about it tho smh
If this isn't a omen idk what to tell y'all,
@@kryztofabner855 literally happened in 2013 with man of steel
I read superman won't be releasing in Australia cinemas is this true?
Low key they want Henry as Supes
2nd plane crash, there’s not a single person on the planet that can tell me these are not intentional!
Tyrone you going to watch the royal rumble tomorrow?
Superman getting sued for that last shot in the teaser ????😂
Angry joe gonna blow
Ppl still watch Tepid Joe?
Small news happens all the time
Tyrone have you seen magazine dreams trailer????
Nobody likes James Gunn,bring back the snyderverse😂 😂😂😂
Man of steel 2013 litigation too-The question of who owns Superman-and the right to make money off the character-has been the subject of ongoing court battles for years, but the latest move in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on Jan. 10 gave Warner Bros. (which owns DC comics) a super-sized leg up. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel.
This has got to be the most ridiculous BS
Their gonna loose again ..notice I said again....
Are you gonna watch the “magazine dreams” trailer?
Does Batman have an estate?
People, pay attention to the details. The copyright for Superman in British Crown countries reverted to the estate 25 years after Schusters death. He died in '96. So Earlier films didn't violate this. Only films/depictions after 2021.
WBD will settle it and move forward. More bad P.R. for WBD. Just what they need after that tv spot fiasco. But they will figure it out.
It is funny though. After they screwed Cavill and moved to this unwanted, unneeded reboot with a bad suit and a cheap look.
How does a fictional character have an “estate” ?
um the guys who created him were real people...
@ i would think he was a property of DC comics therefore having some sort of DC estate be involved in this lawsuit
As a copyright holder themselves, wb can negate the request like thet did in 2013
Good I hope diaper boy never comes out 😂💯
@@Zion.4 Trunks man is going to be out.
@ hopefully not I still can’t believe they butchered my hero
@@Zion.4they butchered the character way before Gunn came in 🤣, this lawsuit is definitely an omen it happened with man of steel and that movie sucked and now it’s happening again which means it may actually be trash
I think You meant *Superman*
@ captain underpants*
LMFAO even the originators FAMILY don't like this BS version of Superman hahaha you never saw this happen with Cavil
Yes it did with man of steel
Yes it did happen before when Man of Steel (2013) came out and around Superman returns (2006) this is nothing new
It literally happened with man of steel 😂
What. Is this a thing?
Yes it’s a thing. As it should be.
Is it for ruining Superman? Cause that would make sense. Did Cavill and the Snyderverse dirty
Damn right
they sued the goats back in the day too
Your bias clouds common sense. - Times-in short, Warner Bros. owns Superman and they can do whatever they want with him. He’ll continue to leap tall buildings into the future, and they’ll continue to make money from him. The decision comes mere months before the June 14, 2013, opening of the latest Superman movie, Warner Bros.’ Man of Steel. They tried suing from Man of Steel and lost.
yall are way too grown to be crying this much.
😱
Restore the Snyderverse
😂
Warner Bros should just block the film in every country and save themselves a huge embarrassment
The Superman estate are big Snyderverse fans
For someone who hates Snyderverse fans, you can't stop talking about them.
@@onepoundofcheese8356 dude they tried sueing Man of Steel(2013) SUPERMAN RETURNS(2006) before has nothing to do with DCEU craps dead