GG Harrit !! Late game is also a thing bro !! Its clearly obvious that Harrit trained a lot about his build orders, what u need now is to learn macro/micro ur unites Personally I always create scenarios on map editor for example I play 20archers vs 30archers and I try to beat my enemy again and again You can try exactly this situation give urself 10 BBC 20 hand canon vs celts so and halb...
Former 1300 player here: at 1300, what you are good at can vary wildly. His boom was fantastic and nearly won him the game. If his positioning, timing, and resource usage were better, he wouldn't be 1300. Also, you notice mistakes better watching than playing. When I watched my own games, it always felt like I played worse than when I was playing.
you start at 1200 if i remember correctly and I woul prolly play worse then both if I get into MP, so.. yeah, we love the game and suck at it at the same time :))
Spectating elo is always way better than playing elo (the "real time" in real-time strategy). Heck, I even complain at my screen at pros playing when they could wipe the floor with 2 of me. When you are doing it yourself, you don't notice what you did wrong, and when you are good at something different that someone else, you usually notice the part they are bad at.
Игры
imagine if he had just surrounded the base with bbt. it would have been so fun.
as the saying goes: "attacking is scouting"
Most passive player ever. Did he forget it’s a war game?
Bombard cannon micro 3/10 HC micro 2/10 Hussar micro 3/10. Using them together 1/10.
GG Harrit !!
Late game is also a thing bro !! Its clearly obvious that Harrit trained a lot about his build orders, what u need now is to learn macro/micro ur unites
Personally I always create scenarios on map editor for example I play 20archers vs 30archers and I try to beat my enemy again and again
You can try exactly this situation give urself 10 BBC 20 hand canon vs celts so and halb...
46:58
This is not 1300 why so many rss?!?!?!? yeah nah no way...
Former 1300 player here: at 1300, what you are good at can vary wildly. His boom was fantastic and nearly won him the game. If his positioning, timing, and resource usage were better, he wouldn't be 1300. Also, you notice mistakes better watching than playing. When I watched my own games, it always felt like I played worse than when I was playing.
Is this really 1300??
you start at 1200 if i remember correctly and I woul prolly play worse then both if I get into MP, so.. yeah, we love the game and suck at it at the same time :))
@@potforgot lower ranks can have a lot of variance. especially with how much elo you can gain or lose from just a small win/loss streak
@@janures The game starts you at 1000 Elo. You gain/lose more rating for the first ten games.
Spectating elo is always way better than playing elo (the "real time" in real-time strategy). Heck, I even complain at my screen at pros playing when they could wipe the floor with 2 of me. When you are doing it yourself, you don't notice what you did wrong, and when you are good at something different that someone else, you usually notice the part they are bad at.
Many people disrespecting harryt in the comments, as if they had always better elo...