Holy this video is insane. So much great information about aerodynamics and really well taught about the principles redbull are using. Wouldn't be surprised if we now see other teams catching on cuz they have figured out the science behind it
Very nice information. Since the new era of F1 cars are so complex it's nice to have some deep technical insides. As a aerospace engineer I love to see cfd result plots. :)
Now I know what Afonso was running in our spec PC room lol X) Thanks a lot for such an informative video and presentation of this really interesting aero trick from RB. If you're ever passing by I'm sure we'd would love to have you attend one of our team meetings and say a few words about your career path thusfar and your career accelerator programme. Great content as usual, keep up the awesome work! :)
This was fascinating. There's also the implication that they can adjust the flow rates to suit the cooling needs of different tracks, as well as adjusting for downforce and drag.
I assume that another advantage is to energize the flow in the coke-bottle area in general. What did you mean by "designing the beam wing on the edge so that extra flow will create separation". Will the extra flow on the suction side move the stagnation point, thus not providing enough velocity on the pressure side's leading edge for the flow to remain attached?
It means the beam wing is a very aggressive design, which can keep the suction side attached without the bypass flow. But when the bypass is blowing at it, the underside could separate.
@@BSport320 Yes, that I understand. But why would it separate with extra flow on the suction side? Would that be because the boundary layer cannot carry the extra flow at such extreme AoA? Thank you.
Excellent video as always, is there a reason only red bull is taking advantage of this and not the other teams? They must be aware of this, just as much as yourself if not more?
Thanks, such a system needs lots of development ressources, which other teams didn't have, because they needed to fix the general concept of their cars first.
Could this be one of the reasons F1 is banning the beam wing for 2022. To make up for the 8.8% loss in cooling, wouldn't the larger inlet needed have a negative effect on overall aero?
I don't think you understand what's going on. Why would it be hot if it's bypassed the rads? Why would it be low energy if it's been funelled in this way?
@@procatprocat9647 The exhaust manifolds are there making things warm. It wouldn't if designed properly. The radiator expansion will slow air down, but the outlet constricting will accelerate it again. Not for free obviously, might create a little extra drag, depending on the shape of the outlet.
Outlet 1 had the best performance on the beam wing alone, but 4 was best overall. Different diameter and hence mass flows were analysed for all four, but we only show the best results here.
@@stephencurry8552 If it's obvious with eyes then why are you asking? It's literally shown on every F1 race ever: They have handheld fans they stick into the radiators and intake to cool the car.
Holy this video is insane. So much great information about aerodynamics and really well taught about the principles redbull are using. Wouldn't be surprised if we now see other teams catching on cuz they have figured out the science behind it
Glad you enjoyed it!
if confirmed, it will be banned.
@@veloso98 it's been 3 years and it's not banned...
0:25 Bro you sneaked in the most creepiest Adrian Newey photo one could find 💀
POV: You caught Adrian Newey discovering a new loophole that hasn't been exploited yet.
@@CyanRooperEfayye: hold it right there!
Very nice information. Since the new era of F1 cars are so complex it's nice to have some deep technical insides. As a aerospace engineer I love to see cfd result plots. :)
Your best video yet!
Wow, thanks!
Wonderfully interesting and greatly explained
Now I know what Afonso was running in our spec PC room lol X) Thanks a lot for such an informative video and presentation of this really interesting aero trick from RB. If you're ever passing by I'm sure we'd would love to have you attend one of our team meetings and say a few words about your career path thusfar and your career accelerator programme. Great content as usual, keep up the awesome work! :)
My pleasure, I am in the Oxford area every now and then
Thanks.
SIDE POD BYPASS ,,,,,,,,,,,, CAN'T WAIT TO SEE MORE THANK YOU !!!
This was fascinating. There's also the implication that they can adjust the flow rates to suit the cooling needs of different tracks, as well as adjusting for downforce and drag.
Bravo! Super!
Exactly what I was looking for!
Awesome! A big thank you goes to Alfonso, Oxford Brookes University, and you as well.
Thanks a lot
Fascinating!
@B Sport, It's a very interesting project with Oxford Brookes University 💥 I'm looking forward to do this kind of dissertation in future.
I assume that another advantage is to energize the flow in the coke-bottle area in general.
What did you mean by "designing the beam wing on the edge so that extra flow will create separation". Will the extra flow on the suction side move the stagnation point, thus not providing enough velocity on the pressure side's leading edge for the flow to remain attached?
It means the beam wing is a very aggressive design, which can keep the suction side attached without the bypass flow. But when the bypass is blowing at it, the underside could separate.
@@BSport320 Yes, that I understand. But why would it separate with extra flow on the suction side? Would that be because the boundary layer cannot carry the extra flow at such extreme AoA?
Thank you.
so auxiliary vents from the last video may be backup cooling vents to prevent overheating, but idea worked so it weren't needed?
You see the duct radiators of mustang p51 its the same trick,wwII aeronautic tech
Excellent video as always, is there a reason only red bull is taking advantage of this and not the other teams? They must be aware of this, just as much as yourself if not more?
Thanks, such a system needs lots of development ressources, which other teams didn't have, because they needed to fix the general concept of their cars first.
Could this be one of the reasons F1 is banning the beam wing for 2022. To make up for the 8.8% loss in cooling, wouldn't the larger inlet needed have a negative effect on overall aero?
Or you have a more efficient engine or you can control the bypass…
I remember you saying most of the air through the side pods is hot low energy air. Good thing someone bothered to test it.
If it goes through the radiator it is. This here doesn’t.
@@BSport320 Good point.
I don't think you understand what's going on. Why would it be hot if it's bypassed the rads? Why would it be low energy if it's been funelled in this way?
@@procatprocat9647 The exhaust manifolds are there making things warm. It wouldn't if designed properly. The radiator expansion will slow air down, but the outlet constricting will accelerate it again. Not for free obviously, might create a little extra drag, depending on the shape of the outlet.
@@rolandotillit2867 you are very confused.
Look at the relative effects.
Learn some fundamentals and basics.
#BDE Sport
I really liked the end of season nose on the Red Bull. That car started out really ugly even though it was quick.
Thanks for bringing back this content. Channel felt a bit dead
Had lots of projects and was travelling but I'm back now
Audio is not good.
it's the same principle as f duct
Fun fact this isn't anything new ask Ferrari about their F1-75
5:41 isn’t outlet 1 the worst performance of the bunch? And does the original study look into outlet 2 at high mass flow rate?
Outlet 1 had the best performance on the beam wing alone, but 4 was best overall. Different diameter and hence mass flows were analysed for all four, but we only show the best results here.
@@BSport320 I see, thanks for clarification. Has Afonso published a paper on this subject? I would love to read about the details.
Yes, you can contact him.
How is it an F1 car does not over heat when stationary for many minutes? The thermal capacity is that large?
It does overheat. That's why they switch off the engine when they are waiting standing still in the pitlane
@@jozsefmolnar6453 Are you a race engineer? If not, then get off my thread. What you stated is obvious to anyone with eyes.
wtf is your problem?
@@stephencurry8552 Yes I am an F1 engineer. Why do you ask questions if you don't accept answers?
@@stephencurry8552 If it's obvious with eyes then why are you asking? It's literally shown on every F1 race ever: They have handheld fans they stick into the radiators and intake to cool the car.